The field of the present invention is touch-sensitive screens.
Many consumer electronic devices are now being built with touch sensitive screens, for use with finger or stylus touch user inputs. These devices range from small screen devices such as mobile phones and car entertainment systems, to mid-size screen devices such as notebook computers, to large screen devices such as check-in stations at airports.
User input to a touch sensitive screen has evolved from basic screen taps to sweep gestures and to more elaborate pinch gestures involving coordinated, simultaneous input from two or more fingers. One of the drawbacks of touch screen input is that the user's hand blocks the user's view of the screen. This is especially true with two-finger pinch gestures where the two fingers span a screen diagonal.
It will thus be appreciated that conventional touch screens are not ideal for finger gesture input. It would be beneficial to provide an economic and aesthetic touch screen device that provides an input zone for finger gesture input that does not obstruct view of the screen.
Aspects of the present invention provide a light-based user interface that detects and identifies finger gestures within a hollow cavity or a recessed cavity of an electronic device. The finger gestures may be one-finger gestures, such as sliding of a finger, or multi-finger gestures, such as a two-finger rotation, a two-finger pinch or a two-finger spread.
Further aspects of the present invention provide a light-based user interface that detects position and orientation of an object inserted within a three-dimensional cavity space, which has application to three-dimensional touch recognition and to three-dimensional modeling.
There is thus provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a light-based finger gesture user interface for an electronic device including a housing for an electronic device, a display mounted in the housing, a cavity, separated from the display, penetrating two opposite sides of the housing, a detector mounted in the housing operative to detect an object inserted in the cavity, and a processor connected to the detector and to the display for causing the display to render a visual representation in response to output from the detector.
There is additionally provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a light-based finger gesture user interface for an electronic device including a housing for an electronic device, a display mounted in the housing for rendering output generated by an application program, a cavity, separated from the display, penetrating two opposite sides of the housing, a sensor mounted in the housing operative to detect an object inserted in the cavity, and a processor in the housing connected to the display and to the sensor, for executing the application program, for receiving output of the sensor, and for providing input to the application program based on at least one of five location and orientation attributes of the object inserted inside the cavity: location along an x-axis, location along a y-axis, location along a z-axis, polar angle in the xy-plane, and polar angle in the yz-plane.
There is further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a three-dimensional modeling system including a handheld housing, a display mounted in the housing, a cavity, separated from the display, penetrating the housing, a plurality of emitters mounted in the housing that emit light pulses into the cavity, a plurality of receivers mounted in the housing that detect the light pulses, and a calculating unit, mounted in the housing and connected to the receivers and to the display, for determining contours of an object inserted in the cavity along two dimensions based on outputs of the receivers, wherein the calculating unit executes a series of such determinations over a time interval, during which time interval the object inserted in the cavity is translated along a plane normal to the cavity to generate a series of two-dimensional scans of contiguous sections of the object, and wherein the calculating unit assembles therefrom a three-dimensional model of the object and causes the display to render the model.
There is additionally provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an electronic device including a light-based touch screen display and a cavity, separated from the display, penetrating two opposite sides of the housing, for providing light-based detection of user gestures performed in the cavity. Both the light-based touch screen display and the finger-gesture cavity are surrounded by pluralities of emitters and receivers mounted in the housing operative to detect objects touching the screen or inserted in the cavity, respectively. A controller in the housing is connected to both sets of emitters and receivers, for executing scan sequences thereon, and a processor is provided in the housing to receive the respective detection signals and determine the location of one or more touches on the screen and also to determine a user gesture of an object inserted inside the cavity.
The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Aspects of the present invention relate to user input to electronic devices, and in particular, to a hollow cavity or a recessed cavity provided in a device housing separate from the device display operable to detect user input gestures performed in the cavity. The input gestures may be one-finger gestures, such as sliding a finger, or multi-finger gestures, such as a two-finger rotation, a two-finger pinch or a two-finger spread. The present invention further provides a light-based user interface that detects position and orientation of an object inserted within the cavity, which has application to three-dimensional touch recognition and to three-dimensional modeling, as described hereinbelow. The invention is described with regard to light based detection apparatus but other detection methods, such as acoustic methods, are also within the scope of the invention.
For clarity of exposition, throughout the present specification, the term “emitter” is used as a generic term to refer to a light emitting element, including inter alia a light-emitting diode (LED), and the output end of a fiber optic or tubular light guide that outputs light into a lens or reflector that directs the light over a display surface or into a cavity. The term “receiver” is used as a generic term to refer to a light detecting element, including inter alia a photo diode (PD), and the input end of a fiber optic or tubular light guide that receives light beams that traversed a display surface or cavity and directs them to a light detecting element or to an image sensor, the image sensor being inter alia a charge coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor.
According to embodiments of the present invention, a subsystem is provided as a complement to a touch screen display, providing new types of user interaction, as well as many functionalities provided by a mouse input device but absent in finger-based touch screens. Physically, the device contains a display with a touch sensor combined with a fixed or foldable complementary optical sensor that allows items to be tracked inside an open frame. The open frame may be integrated into the device in a fixed manner, or as a foldable frame.
Prior art display touch sensors provide 2+1 input dimensions, i.e., X, Y and Z, where Z is typically only a binary dimension to distinguish touch from non-touch, although limited continuous dimension sensing is technically possible. Using a Z dimension on a touch screen has a disadvantage in that the further away from the XY plane the finger is located, the more of the display image is covered from visibility, due to the parallax effect between the eye and the display.
When combined with the user input cavity of the present invention, a touch screen is used for item selection, in a manner similar to ordinary user interface (UI) solutions. The user input cavity subsystem of the present invention provides extra dimensions of user input for context interaction with the item selected on the touch screen. One such interaction is an object selected on the touch display with one hand, and then changed in appearance though the user input cavity with the other hand. This combination provides a unique user input experience and makes user interaction more efficient. It also enables restoring mouse input functions by mimicking scroll wheel functions, right- or middle-button clicks, as well as combined control-button and clicks.
According to embodiments of the present invention, a user input cavity for detecting user gestures is provided in a device housing separate from the device display. Reference is made to
Cavity 850 includes one or more emitters, including inter alia infra-red or near infra-red light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and a plurality of receivers, including inter alia photo diodes (PDs), arranged along the cavity perimeter. Reference is made to
Reference is made to
The user input cavity detectors determine a Euclidean space aligned to the plane bound by the input cavity frame, and extending along the normal of that plane. Depending upon the mechanical design, this space is oriented differently relative to the space defined by the display plane and its normal. The coordinates of the user input cavity space are denoted X, Y and Z, and the rotational angles around these axes are denoted α, β and γ, respectively. The two finger distance scalar (grip) is called the S coordinate. These coordinates are now described.
TABLE I summarizes the input coordinates provided by the cavity subsystem. TABLE I does not include the display touch subsystem.
The X and Y coordinates are along the plane bound by the cavity frame edges. These coordinates accurately cover the area bounded by the edges. The Z coordinate extends along the normal of the plane bound by the cavity edges, in effect measuring how far an object is inserted into the cavity. Detection along the Z dimension is accurate within a small range defined by the distance between the sensing layers. Detection within the accuracy range is based upon the differential of the signal level of the two sensing layers.
Reference is made to
The α and β angles are rotational and extend around the X and Y axes, respectively. Accuracy is related to the distance between the sensing layers and is generally less sensitive to smaller angles towards the XY plane normal. The rotational extension is more limited by human anatomy than by the sensor. There is a theoretical gap in detecting small angles relative to the XY plane, and the frame edges themselves also set a limit below ±90°. Sensing is done by calculating the angle between the detection points of the sensing layers.
Reference is made to
As such, when a single finger is inserted into the cavity, five user input coordinates are determined; namely, X, Y, Z, α, and β.
When two fingers are inserted into the cavity, two additional input coordinates are determined; namely, γ and S, thus providing a total of 7 input coordinates.
The S coordinate is a scalar and is defined by the distance between the two fingers inserted into the user input cavity. Accuracy of the S coordinate is high for all positive values; however, it is difficult to distinguish a zero value from a single finger. Sensing is done by calculating the distance between the X and Y coordinates of the two fingers.
The γ dimension is rotational and extends around the Z axis. It is only available in two-finger mode. Accuracy is high except for very small S values. Extension is unlimited, that is, sensing can be done for an infinite rotation. Sensing is done by calculating an angle based upon the X and Y deltas between the two fingers.
Reference is made to
Input from the cavity subsystem is preferably utilized according to the extent and accuracy of the different coordinates. The accuracy of X, Y, γ, and S is of advantage for continuous object manipulation, such as translation, rotation and scrolling. The lower accuracy coordinates are of advantage for additional functionality, such as menu navigation. From a user perspective this is easily understood; namely, (i) sweep one finger to scroll, (ii) tilt an inserted finger to open a pop-up menu, and (ii) use two fingers to manipulate objects, such as resizing and rotation.
The number of fingers inserted into the input cavity acts as an intuitive mode setting. For example, one finger may scroll and select menus, and two fingers may manipulate objects.
In some embodiments the low-resolution coordinates α, β and Z are used in combination for quick single-finger gestures to invoke transient commands, in a “tilt-and-insert” manner. Using all combinations of α, β and Z would complicate the UI. Therefore, a balanced scenario limits the possibilities. For example, insert a straight finger to enable scrolling, and insert a tilted finger to mimic a mouse right-click, say, to open a context-sensitive menu.
TABLE II summarizes the user cavity input coordinates, appropriate gestures for each coordinate, and examples of UI functions.
In an embodiment of the present invention, plural emitters are arranged along two adjacent sides of a rectangular cavity, and plural receivers are arranged along the other two adjacent sides. Reference is made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is made to
In many devices today a pinch gesture performed on a touch screen activates a zoom-out function on the displayed screen image, and a spread gesture performed on a touch screen activates a zoom-in function on the displayed screen image. The present invention enables performing these gestures in cavity 850 without blocking the user's view of the image on the screen. The problem of obstructing the user's view is especially acute in conventional devices where pinch and spread gestures are performed along a screen diagonal, as the user's hand blocks a large portion of the screen in such cases. According to certain embodiments, translating a single finger in a first direction along cavity 850 corresponds to a conventional pinch gesture on the touch screen, and translating a single finger in the opposite direction along cavity 850 corresponds to a conventional spread gesture on the touch screen. This simplifies the gesture and allows easy adaptation of existing application software to devices of the present invention, whereby the user gesture input cavity driver sends a message equivalent to a pinch or spread gesture to the host processor or application software.
It is evident from
Alternatively, in such cases one emitter-detector pair is provided on the narrow cavity edge and this is used to determine if a finger is inserted at all. This saves power, as compared with the power required to pulse a plurality of emitters along the longer edge. Once a finger insertion is detected, only the emitter-detector pairs along the longer edge are activated to determine the exact nature of the user gesture.
In
Another advantage of multiple stacked layers of emitters and receivers is that it enables determining an angle of approach through the cavity and also a standing angle of the object inside the cavity. One use for this information is to enable user gestures of inserting a finger and tilting it in various directions. For example, to scroll a document a user inserts his finger and tilts it forward without moving the bottom of his finger to scroll. The degree of tilt sets the scrolling speed.
Another advantage of multiple stacked layers of emitters and receivers is that it enables detecting the two or more touches in a multi-touch in an order. Multiple concurrent touches, such as two diagonally opposed touches are ambiguous because the detection pattern of receivers is substantially the same for both cases of diagonal touches, i.e., concurrent upper-left and lower-right touches generate the same pattern of blocked receivers as concurrent upper-right and lower-left touches. When one touch is actuated slightly before the second touch, this can be used to disambiguate the touch pattern. For example, if the first detected touch is unambiguously determined to be at the lower left corner, then the subsequent second touch must be at the upper right corner. In a system with multiple stacked layers of emitters and receivers, each layer provides an opportunity to detect the insertion one finger before another, increasing the likelihood that this is detected.
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
According to further features of the invention, a device includes both a user gesture input cavity and a touch sensitive display. This allows for combination gestures where a user performs a gesture on the screen and a gesture in the cavity. In this regard, reference is made to
Reference is made to
Reference is also made to
By aligning the user input cavity frame and the display unit on the same plane with a centered shaft near one of the edges, the frame can be rotated continuously relative to the display. This provides flexibility and makes the unit robust, as a user is not restricted by the extent to which the frame can be opened. By making the user input cavity frame slightly thicker than the display unit, the sensing layers of the frame enclose the display unit when folded. By using collector rails (not shown) at the two shafts in hinge 835 that lock the display unit to the user input cavity frame, there are no wires that get twisted, and the user input cavity frame may rotate continuously around hinge 835. At least two collectors are used for power feed. Control and touch event data are superimposed on the power signals, or have their own collector rails.
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
Folding the user input cavity frame towards or away from the user may depend upon the use case. Some use cases are as follows.
When holding the unit in the air, convenience is achieved with the input cavity frame approximately 45° towards the user, or folding it 90° away from the user.
When the unit is resident on a table, the display may be placed flat on the table and the user input cavity frame can be positioned straight up at an angle of 90°. Alternatively, with the device resident on a table, the user input cavity frame can also be completely folded out to form a continuation of the display plane. Yet another alternative is that the frame doubles as a support for an upright display, as illustrated in
Moving along the Z axis in a 3D realm has always been a challenge using 2D input devices. When using a mouse, the scroll wheel and/or right-click plus Y movement have become standard methods of manipulating objects in the Z dimension. Neither of these methods are available when using a touch screen.
Aligning the user input cavity frame along the YZ plane, e.g., by standing the frame upright on the right side on a horizontal display, renders the cavity's Y coordinate an intuitive Z movement control for a 3D UI. Moreover, user gestures in the cavity do not obstruct the user's view of the display, which a Z movement of a finger on top of the display would obstruct.
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
Android Launcher Application
Aspects of the present invention include an architecture for integrating a user interface gesture cavity into the ANDROID® operating system. Similar architectures are used for other operating systems. The Android launcher is the initial UI from which a user activates applications. The launcher is activated when the user presses a “Home” button. Android provides a standard launcher, and there are many third party launchers. Many device vendors provide their own launcher. Aspects of the present invention include an Android UI that supports features provided by the present invention; namely, a touch input cavity separate from the screen, and touch information regarding the screen's Z-plane, beyond the binary touch/no-touch information provided by conventional touch screen devices.
In general, Android launchers provide a workspace divided into multiple screens. The user switches between the different screens, typically by performing a sideways sweep gesture, i.e., by gliding a finger across the width of the screen. A certain area of the workspace is fixed so that it does not switch with the screens. This fixed area, often called a “dock”, contains icons for launching popular applications, e.g., a dialer, a program drawer, and an Internet search. The workspace has a background shared by all screens that typically slides in sync with the screen switches.
Each screen holds widgets, shortcuts, folders and live folders, which are real-time views on the screen of a content provider. A live folder displays data from a source without forcing the user to launch an application. As such, a live folder may be used to display contacts, bookmarks, email, playlists, and RSS feeds. Screens usually have a grid layout, so that icons and widgets cannot be placed at any arbitrary position. Performing a long hold on an item on any screen switches mode so that the item can be moved, or dragged to a “trash bin.” Performing a long hold on an empty portion of a screen opens a menu for a user to select new items to be added to the screen.
The launcher also provides an application “drawer,” which is opened from any screen and contains a list of all installed applications as labels or icons. Typically the list is in the form of a scrollable list or a multi-page grid. Performing a long hold on an application label or icon within the application drawer switches to a mode where the application can be placed on any screen.
To summarize, a launcher must be able to handle widgets, live folders and application startups, and should be able to handle user folders, shortcuts and wallpaper.
The workspace in most launchers is divided into screens containing shortcuts, widgets, folders and live folders. The workspace in an embodiment of a launcher for the present invention is conceptually configured in the 3D realm, with the workspace screens being distributed among various objects, surfaces or virtual rooms that provide logical grouping of items. The launcher UI is manifested as a scene graph which can be modeled in 2D or 3D.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the launcher contains wallpaper as a background image for the 3D realm, although there are differences between the type of image appropriate for 3D backgrounds and 2D wallpapers. In most cases, the outlook of the 3D background is sufficiently different from desktop wallpaper that it is handled as a separate entity in the design process.
In embodiments of the invention where the user interface gesture cavity rotates or slides around the display screen to provide an additional layer of input that is mapped onto the screen, the Android desktop UI supports two different modes; namely, closed and open. In closed mode the user interface gesture cavity surrounds the display screen to provide an additional layer of input that is mapped onto the screen. In open mode the cavity is separate from the screen. In open mode, the device receives multi-dimensional input from two separate subsystems; namely, from the screen and from the cavity. In closed mode, there is only one input; namely, touches the user performs on the screen. These touches are detected both by the screen and by the cavity.
Application Architectures
Various architectures for user interface (UI) representations are based upon similar concepts; namely, a graph of data objects representing a current structure of a UI, often referred to as a “model”, which is rendered graphically on a screen in what is referred to as a “view”. Nodes in a data object graph represent static and interactive UI objects, such as text, images, buttons and checkboxes. Different graphical representations of the same data object graph may exist simultaneously.
Various implements for a UI model are in use. For web browsers and for many word processors, the structure of a UI is a Document Object Model (DOM), for ANDOID™ the structure is a “view tree”, and for FLASH® the structure is a “scene”. The underlying concept is the same, regardless of hardware platform, operating system, runtime environment and programming language. Many platform vendors impose a preference for the UI model that is used. In an ANDROID™ environment, the programmer is recommended to use a set of XML files, called “application resources”, to describe the UI model, and to use the JAVA® programming language, which is compiled into byte code for the DALVIK® runtime engine. However, developer requests led to the capability of using native C code for the programming language, through the Native Development Kit (NDK), and of using scripting languages, through the Scripting Layer SLA4 for ANDROID™.
Aspects of the present invention are applicable to any platform, model, programming environment and runtime environment. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the UI data object graph is manipulated at run-time, based upon user events generated by a user input cavity.
The data object graph representing the UI is generally inflated from a textual representation. Inter alia, for web browsers, the inflated form may be an HTML document, for word browsers, the inflated form may be an OOXML document, and for SILVERLIGHT®, the inflated form may be an XAML document. In addition to being inflated from a document, the data object graph may be manipulated in response to events in a running application such as a web browser, a document editor and a desktop, such as in response to an event when a user uses a keyboard or pointer to interact with the UI.
Aspects of the present invention relate to manipulating the UI model. The user interface cavity interacts with the UI through a processing chain similar to other input devices, such as a touch screen, a mouse and a keyboard. Namely, a low level device driver captures raw events from the user input cavity and dispatches them via the operating system into the running application, which in turn interprets them and applies appropriate modifications to the UI model.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, user interaction with the UI model includes inter alia the following actions.
The user input cavity recreates input events that are used in a conventional PC environment, which normally are actuated by input methods that are not available for touch-based interfaces, including inter alia modifier keys (CTRL, ALT), additional mouse buttons and scroll wheels. It is not required to modify program code of target applications to support such events, since an intermediate device driver layer may translate user input cavity events to events that are familiar to the target application. Examples include inter alia zoom, cut & paste, scrolling and opening context menus. As such, third party applications can incorporate that user input cavity of the present invention without modification.
Moreover, the user input cavity of the present invention generates a variety of novel types of user input events including inter alia three-dimensional manipulation of objects, as described hereinbelow. To support such events, specific application code is required; i.e., existing applications require modification. The event handler of the application code listens for events from standard input devices, in parallel with the user input cavity, and manipulates the UI model in accordance with patterns that correspond to the new features.
Various options are available for writing new applications that use the novel input patterns provided by the user input cavity of the present invention. In an all JAVA® model, the full application is written in the JAVA® programming language and compiled to the DALVIK® framework. This is a conventional way of generating ANDROID™ applications, but it imposes two major drawbacks; namely, performance and flexibility.
An alternative model combines JAVA® and C. In this model, the program logic is written in JAVA® and the time-critical parts are written in C, exposed to the JAVA® layer via the JAVA® Native Interface (JNI). This enables performance improvements, and is a good way to start a project, as code can be ported from the JAVA® layer to the C layer on demand.
Yet another alternative model combines JAVA®, scripting and C. In this model too, the program logic is written in JAVA® and the time-critical parts are written in C, but the dynamic parts of the application are written in a scripting language hosted by the JAVA® layer, such as PYTHON®, Ruby or JAVASCRIPT®, and interpreted at runtime. This improves flexibility during development, as small changes may be made without recompiling and reinstalling the application.
A different model uses only scripting and C. This is an approach where the application appears as a native application with no JAVA™ layer, and the dynamic parts are handled by a scripting layer that communicates with the application through a remote procedure call (RPC). This is a complex, yet very flexible model, which is commonly used in gaming.
The launcher UI is manifested as a scene graph modeled in 2D or 3D. There is no connection to the system of UI definitions as ANDROID™ resource files; everything is contained in a single view. Reference is made to
Applications
The finger gesture user interface of the present invention is of widespread advantage in many different applications. Inter alia several of these applications are described in what follows.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the object inserted into the cavity is two fingers, and the user interface distinguishes between four mufti-finger gestures performed in said cavity; namely, (i) clockwise rotation, (ii) counter-clockwise rotation, (iii) finger pinch, and (iv) finger spread.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display is a stereoscopic viewport, which renders a graphic being rotated in three dimensions in response to an object being inserted in the cavity.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display pans an image or scrolls a document or a list in response to a one-finger gesture, and zooms an image, or rotates an object or opens a file in response to a two-finger gesture.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display renders animated navigation of snapshots of widgets, documents, web page bookmarks, album artwork or photographs in response to a translation gesture; and renders opening of a widget, a document, a web page, an album or a photograph in response to a two-finger gesture.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display renders fast animation of snapshots of widgets, documents, web page bookmarks, album artwork or photographs in response to a translation gesture; renders slow animation thereof in response to a first two-finger gesture; renders opening of a widget, document, web page, album or photograph in response to a second two-finger gesture; and renders closing thereof in response to a third two-finger gesture.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a cut and paste routine is provided. In this routine a user selects text or an object by touching the text or object on the display with one hand. The thumb and index finger of the other hand are then entered into the user input cavity frame, moved together in a pinch gesture and removed from the frame. This is the cut operation, figuratively grabbing the text or object. A target position for the cut object is marked by touching the display with one hand, then inserting the other hand with the thumb and index finger brought together into the user input frame, then bringing them apart in a spread gesture, which figuratively represents dropping the previously grabbed text or object into its new location.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an application program defines a context, and a function related to the context is activated in response to a finger gesture. For example, the display renders a menu of context-relevant options in response to tilting a finger inside a cavity at an acute angle.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display renders an image, identifies a selected location within the image, and processes the selected location, in response to a finger gesture.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the display is a touch screen display, and the user interface detects finger gestures on the touch screen and also finger gestures in a cavity. The display pans an image in response to a finger gesture on the touch screen, and resizes the image in response to a finger gesture in the cavity. The finger gesture on the touch screen is inter alia a finger translation, and the finger gesture in the cavity is inter alia a finger pinch or a finger translation.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, one or more objects are rendered, one of which is identified as being a selected object, and an application program processes the selected object, in response to a finger gesture performed in the user input cavity. For a first example, the selected object is selected text within a document, and the application program maintains the selected text at its location within the document and moves unselected text, thereby positioning the selected text at a different location within the document, in response to a finger gesture in the cavity. Moreover, the selected text is fixed at the different location in response to a second finger gesture in the cavity.
For a second example, the selected object is an icon, and the application program maintains the selected icon at its location on the display and moves unselected icons, thereby positioning the selected icon at a different location in the UI, in response to a finger gesture in the cavity. For example, in response to a user gesture in the cavity, inter alia a translation gesture, all unselected icons in the current Android screen are graphically swept off the display and icons from a different screen are graphically swept onto the display. This situates the selected icon on a different Android screen. Moreover, the icon text is fixed at the different location in response to a second finger gesture, inter alia removing the user's fingers from the cavity.
For a third example, the selected object is an entry in a contact list, and the application program initiates a phone call to the selected entry in response to a first finger gesture in the cavity, and opens an SMS dialog box addressed to the selected entry in response to a second finger gesture in the cavity.
For a fourth example, the selected object is a selected time interval within a calendar, and the application program causes the calendar to increase or decrease resolution to present a respectively greater or lesser time interval centered around the selected time interval.
For a fifth example, the selected object is a file, and the application is a file manager. The file manager presents properties of the selected file in response to an initial finger gesture in the cavity, and opens the selected file in response to an extension of the initial gesture. Moreover, the file system has multiple levels of folders, and the file manager presents properties of a selected file in response to an initial gesture in the cavity, displays the selected file as an icon in its folder in response to an extension of the initial gesture, and displays the folder as an icon in its next level folder in response to a further extension of the initial gesture.
For a sixth example, the selected object is a person within a social network, and the application program is a social network application. The application renders a first plurality of persons connected to the selected person in response to an initial gesture in the cavity, and renders a second plurality of persons connected to the first plurality of persons in response to an extension of the initial gesture.
For a seventh example, the selected object is a song or an artist in a music library, and the application program is a music library manager. The music library manager renders a first plurality of songs related to the selected song or artist in response to an initial finger gesture in the cavity, and renders a second plurality of songs connected to the first plurality of songs in response to an extension of the initial gesture.
For an eighth example, the selected object is a restaurant or hotel, and the application program is a reservation program for restaurants or hotels. The reservation program displays a plurality of restaurants or hotels similar to the selected restaurant or hotel in terms of style, cost, location or such other parameter(s), in response to an initial gesture in the cavity, and renders additional similar restaurants or hotels in response to an extension of the initial gesture.
Reference is made to
An alternative embodiment reduces the number of components in the system by coupling an emitter or a receiver to one end of a long thin light guide situated along an edge of the cavity. Such a light guide is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,095 to Lieberman et al., entitled ILLUMINATION FOR OPTICAL TOUCH PANEL.
Calibration of User Gesture Cavity Components
Calibration of emitters and detectors for object detection is described in Applicant's co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/053,229, entitled “Touch Screen Calibration and Update Methods,” filed on Mar. 22, 2011, Published as US Publ. No. 2011/0169781 A1 on Jul. 14, 2011.
ASIC Controller for Light-Based Touch Screens
Aspects of the present invention relate to design and use of a programmable state machine to control both the user gesture input cavity and a light based touch screen in a single device. The controller executes a scanning program on the series of emitters and detectors in both the touch screen and in the user gesture input cavity. The scanning program determines scan sequence, current levels and pulse widths. By configuring the scan sequence registers, the host processor determines which LED-PD pairs are activated. The controller thus sets activation for LED-PD pairs surrounding the screen, for LED-PD pairs in the user input gesture cavity, or for both. The host processor associates each LED and each PD with either the screen or the cavity and processes its results accordingly. For example, touches on the screen require greater precision than the user gestures in the input cavity. Therefore, detection results on the screen are filtered both temporally and spatially, whereas detection results in the input cavity are not filtered, or alternatively are filtered only spatially, optionally using a different set of filter coefficients. In addition, the scan sequence configuration registers enable configuring an oversampled activation sequence, inter alia activating each emitter with two detectors, and a one-to-one sequence, wherein each emitter is activated with only one detector. Typically, the emitters and detectors around the user input cavity are aligned opposite one another. In some embodiments of the present invention, at least two sets of scan configuration registers are provided to enable configuring two different scan patterns; namely, one set for emitters and receivers around the screen, and one set for emitters and detectors surrounding the user input cavity, to be executed in a single scan operation of the controller. In other embodiments scan sequences for the screen are configured and executed separately from scan sequences for the user input cavity.
The controller includes integrated LED drivers for LED current control, integrated receiver drivers for photo detector current measurement, and an integrated A/D convertor to enable communication between the controller and a host processor using a standard bus interface, such as a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI).
In accordance with the present invention, a program is loaded onto the controller, e.g., over SPI. Thereafter, scanning execution runs independently from the host processor, optimizing overall system power consumption. When the scan data are ready, the controller issues an interrupt to the host processor via an INT pin.
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
Emitter driver circuitry 740 includes circuitry 742 for configuring individual photoemitter pulse durations and pulse currents for each emitter-detector pair via a programmable current source. Circuitry 742 is described in applicants' co-pending patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/052,511 entitled LIGHT-BASED TOUCH SCREEN WITH SHIFT-ALIGNED EMITTER AND RECEIVER LENSES filed on Mar. 21, 2011, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Inter alia, reference is made to paragraphs [0343]-[0358] and FIGS. 99-101 of this application as published in U.S. Publication No. 2011/0163998 on Jul. 7, 2011.
Chip package 731 includes detector driver circuitry 750 for selectively activating a plurality of photo detectors 300 that are outside of the chip package, and signal conducting pins 733 for connecting photo detectors 300 to detector driver circuitry 750. Detector driver circuitry 750 includes circuitry 755 for filtering current received from photo detectors 300 by performing a continuous feedback bandpass filter, and circuitry 756 for digitizing the bandpass filtered current. Circuitry 755 is described inter alia at paragraphs [0076], paragraphs [107]-[0163] and FIGS. 14-23B of the above-reference U.S. Publication No. 2009/0189878 A1. Chip package 731 also includes detector signal processing circuitry 753 for generating detection signals representing measured amounts of light detected on photo detectors 300.
Chip package 731 further includes I/O pins 736 for communicating with a host processor 772, and conducting pins for connecting to a power source. Chip package 731 further includes controller circuitry 759 for controlling emitter driver circuitry 740 and detector driver circuitry 750. Controller circuitry 759 communicates with host processor 772 using a bus standard for a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) 775. Chip package 731 further includes a chip select (CS) pin 737 for coordinating operation of controller circuitry 759 with at least one additional controller 774 for the light-based touch screen.
The controller shown in
Reference is made to
As such, an LED is accessed by selection of a row and a column I/O pin. The controller includes push-pull drivers for selecting rows and columns. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the row and column coordinates of the LEDs are unrelated to the physical placement of the LEDs and the push-pull drivers. In particular, the LEDs do not need to be physically positioned in a rectangular matrix.
In an alternative embodiment of the controller of the present invention, current source drivers are used instead of push-pull drivers. In another embodiment of the controller of the present invention, some of the push-pull drivers are combined with current source drivers, and others of the push-pull drivers are combined with current sink drivers.
When the controller of the present invention scans a series of emitter-receiver pairs, an LED driver supplies an amount of current to an LED in accordance with settings in LED current control registers and LED pulse length control registers. LEDs are selected for activation in accordance with settings in scan range registers. The scan range registers designate a first LED to be activated along each screen edge and along the cavity edge, the number of LEDs to be activated along each edge, and the step factor between activated LEDs. A step factor of 0 indicates that at each step the next LED is activated, and a step factor of 1 indicates that every other LED is activated. Thus, to activate only odd or only even LEDs, a step factor of 1 is used. Step factors of 2 or more may be used for steps of 2 or more LEDs, respectively. An additional register configures the number of PDs that are activated with each LED. A value of 0 indicates that each LED is activated with a single corresponding PD, and a value of 1 indicates that each LED is activated with two PDs. The number of PDs activated with each LED may be as many PD that are available around the touch screen. Typically, the controller will activate separate scan sequences for the screen elements and for the cavity elements. These activations are differentiated by the index of elements included in each sequence. For example, elements 1-20 are screen LEDs, and elements 21-30 are cavity LEDs.
The controller of the present invention automatically controls a mux to direct current to desired LEDs. The LED mux control is set by scanning control registers. The controller automatically synchronizes the correct PD receiver when the drivers pulse the LEDs. Twelve-bit ADC receiver information is stored in PD data registers. Upon completion of scanning, the controller issues an interrupt to the host processor, and automatically enters standby mode.
In some touch screen configurations, screen-related emitters are shift-aligned with receivers, with emitters being detected by more than one receiver and being activated one or more times for each detecting receiver. For example, an emitter may be activated three times in rapid succession, and with each activation a different receiver is activated. Moreover, a receiver is further activated during the interval between emitter activations to determine an ambient light intensity.
In other touch screen configurations, screen-related emitters and receivers are aligned, but each emitter is detected by more than one receiver, and each emitter is activated separately for each detecting receiver. Emitter-receiver activation patterns are described in applicants' co-pending patent application U.S. Ser. No. 12/667,692 entitled SCANNING OF A TOUCH SCREEN filed on Jan. 5, 2010, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Inter alia, reference is made to paragraphs [0029], [0030], [0033] and [0034] of this application as published in U.S. Publication No. 2011/0043485 on Feb. 24, 2011.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the controller is a simple state machine and does not include a processor core, such as an ARM core. As such, costs of controllers of the present invention are low. A light-based touch screen using a controller of the present invention costs less than a comparable capacitive touch screen, since a capacitive touch screen requires a processor core in order to integrate a large number of signals and calculate a touch location. In order to achieve a quick response time, a capacitive touch screen uses a dedicated processor core to calculate a touch location, instead of offloading this calculation to a host processor. In turn, this increases the bill of materials for capacitive touch screens. In distinction, light-based touch screens of the present invention use two neighboring receiver values to calculate a touch location along an axis, which enables the host to calculate a touch location and, consequently, enables use of a low-cost controller. In addition, devices according to the teachings of the present invention use resources efficiently by utilizing the same controller for both the touch screen and the user gesture cavity.
The present invention has broad application to electronic devices with touch sensitive screens, including small-size, mid-size and large-size screens. Such devices include inter alia computers, home entertainment systems, car entertainment systems, security systems, PDAs, cell phones, electronic games and toys, digital photo frames, digital musical instruments, e-book readers, TVs and GPS navigators.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to the specific exemplary embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/564,868, entitled LIGHT-BASED FINGER GESTURE USER INTERFACE, filed on Nov. 30, 2011 by inventors Thomas Eriksson, Per Leine, Jochen Laveno Mangelsdorff, Robert Pettersson and Anders Jansson.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4144449 | Funk et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4243879 | Carroll et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4301447 | Funk et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4518249 | Murata et al. | May 1985 | A |
4550250 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4703316 | Sherbeck | Oct 1987 | A |
4710760 | Kasday | Dec 1987 | A |
4782328 | Denlinger | Nov 1988 | A |
4790028 | Ramage | Dec 1988 | A |
4847606 | Beiswenger | Jul 1989 | A |
4880969 | Lawrie | Nov 1989 | A |
4928094 | Smith | May 1990 | A |
5003505 | McClelland | Mar 1991 | A |
5016008 | Gruaz et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036187 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053758 | Cornett et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5119079 | Hube et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5162783 | Moreno | Nov 1992 | A |
5179369 | Person et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194863 | Barker et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5220409 | Bures | Jun 1993 | A |
5283558 | Chan | Feb 1994 | A |
5406307 | Hirayama et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414413 | Tamaru et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422494 | West et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5463725 | Henckel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5559727 | Deley et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577733 | Downing | Nov 1996 | A |
5579035 | Beiswenger | Nov 1996 | A |
5603053 | Gough et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5612719 | Beernink et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618232 | Martin | Apr 1997 | A |
5729250 | Bishop et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748185 | Stephan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5785439 | Bowen | Jul 1998 | A |
5825352 | Bisset et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838308 | Knapp et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880462 | Hsia | Mar 1999 | A |
5880743 | Moran et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886697 | Naughton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889236 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900875 | Haitani et al. | May 1999 | A |
5914709 | Graham et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936615 | Waters | Aug 1999 | A |
5943043 | Furuhata et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943044 | Martinelli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956030 | Conrad et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5988645 | Downing | Nov 1999 | A |
6010061 | Howell | Jan 2000 | A |
6023265 | Lee | Feb 2000 | A |
6031989 | Cordell | Feb 2000 | A |
6052279 | Friend et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073036 | Heikkinen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085204 | Chijiwa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091405 | Lowe et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6246395 | Goyins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259436 | Moon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292179 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340979 | Beaton et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346935 | Nakajima et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356287 | Ruberry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359632 | Eastty et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362468 | Murakami et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6411283 | Murphy | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421042 | Omura et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429857 | Masters et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456952 | Nathan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542191 | Yonezawa | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549217 | De Greef et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570557 | Westerman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597345 | Hirshberg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628268 | Harada et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6639584 | Li | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646633 | Nicolas | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6677932 | Westerman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690365 | Hinckley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690387 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6707449 | Hinckley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727917 | Chew et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734883 | Wynn et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757002 | Oross et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6788292 | Nako et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803906 | Morrison et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6833827 | Lui et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836367 | Seino et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857746 | Dyner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864882 | Newton | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874683 | Keronen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888536 | Westerman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6944557 | Hama et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947032 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954197 | Morrison et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958749 | Matsushita et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6972401 | Akitt et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988246 | Kopitzke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992660 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006077 | Uusimaki | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007239 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7030861 | Westerman et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7133032 | Cok | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155683 | Williams | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7159763 | Yap et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176905 | Baharav et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184030 | McCharles et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7225408 | O'Rourke | May 2007 | B2 |
7232986 | Worthington et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254775 | Geaghan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265748 | Ryynanen | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283845 | De Bast | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286063 | Gauthey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
RE40153 | Westerman et al. | Mar 2008 | E |
7339580 | Westerman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352940 | Charters et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355594 | Barkan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369724 | Deane | May 2008 | B2 |
7372456 | McLintock | May 2008 | B2 |
7429706 | Ho | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435940 | Eliasson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441196 | Gottfurcht et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442914 | Eliasson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7464110 | Pyhalammi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465914 | Eliasson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479949 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7633300 | Keroe et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7663607 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7705835 | Eikman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742290 | Kaya | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7782296 | Kong et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812828 | Westerman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7855716 | McCreary et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880724 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7880732 | Goertz | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7961176 | Moon | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8022941 | Smoot | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8068101 | Goertz | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8095879 | Goertz | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8120625 | Hinckley | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8169404 | Boillot | May 2012 | B1 |
8195243 | Kim | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8416217 | Eriksson et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20010002694 | Nakazawa et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010022579 | Hirabayashi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026268 | Ito | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010028344 | Iwamoto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030641 | Suzuki | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043189 | Brisebois et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055006 | Sano et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002326 | Causey, III et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027549 | Hirshberg | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046353 | Kishimoto | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060699 | D'Agostini | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067346 | Mouton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075244 | Tani et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109843 | Ehsani et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020171691 | Currans et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173300 | Shtivelman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175900 | Armstrong | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191029 | Gillespie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002809 | Jian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010043 | Ferragut, II | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013483 | Ausems et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030656 | Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043207 | Duarte | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076306 | Zadesky et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095102 | Kraft et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030122787 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234346 | Kao | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021643 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040021681 | Liao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046960 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056199 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100510 | Milic-Frayling et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109013 | Goertz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125143 | Deaton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040263482 | Goertz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050035956 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046621 | Kaikuranta | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091612 | Stabb et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104860 | McCreary et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122308 | Bell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165615 | Minar | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174473 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050253818 | Nettamo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271319 | Graham | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001654 | Smits | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060161870 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161871 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229509 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024598 | Miller et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070082707 | Flynt et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084989 | Lange et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070146318 | Juh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150842 | Chaudhri et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152984 | Ording et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223792 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008472 | Dress et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012850 | Keating, III | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013913 | Lieberman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055273 | Forstall | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068353 | Lieberman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086703 | Flynt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093542 | Lieberman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100593 | Skillman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111797 | Lee | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117176 | Ko et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117183 | Yu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121442 | Boer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122792 | Izadi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122796 | Jobs et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122803 | Izadi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136790 | Hio | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152195 | Nagasaka et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158174 | Land et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165190 | Min et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192025 | Jaeger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211779 | Pryor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259053 | Newton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273019 | Deane | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297409 | Klassen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080297487 | Hotelling et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006418 | O'Malley | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027357 | Morrison | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031208 | Robinson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058833 | Newton | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064055 | Chaudhri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066673 | Molne et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096994 | Smits | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090139778 | Butler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090143052 | Bates et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166098 | Sunder | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187840 | Moosavi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189878 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192849 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090256809 | Minor | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285383 | Tsuei | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322699 | Hansson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322701 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017872 | Goertz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100031203 | Morris et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053111 | Karlsson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100134424 | Brisebois et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100193259 | Wassvik | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238138 | Goertz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238139 | Goertz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283747 | Kukulski | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110007032 | Goertz | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043485 | Goertz | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043826 | Kiyose | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087963 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090168 | Goto et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110128234 | Lipman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110134064 | Goertz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154260 | Wang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161843 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163971 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110163998 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167628 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169780 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169781 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169782 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175852 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179368 | King et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181552 | Goertz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110210946 | Goertz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239155 | Christie | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246923 | Kasahara et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260980 | Palacios | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110310005 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120081299 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094723 | Goertz | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120242620 | Bos | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130009911 | Shibata | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0330767 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0513694 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0601651 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0618528 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0703525 | Mar 1996 | EP |
1059603 | Dec 2000 | EP |
03-216719 | Sep 1991 | JP |
5173699 | Dec 1991 | JP |
11232024 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2003-296151 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004-127072 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-185258 | Jul 2004 | JP |
8600446 | Jan 1986 | WO |
8600447 | Jan 1986 | WO |
0102949 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0140922 | Jun 2001 | WO |
02095668 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03038592 | May 2003 | WO |
03083767 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005026938 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2008147266 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009008786 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2010093570 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010121031 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Moeller et al., “Scanning FTIR: Unobtrusive Optoelectronic Multi-Touch Sensing through Waveguide Transmissivity Imaging”,TEI '10, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 73-76, ACM, New York, NY, Jan. 25-27, 2010. |
Moeller et al., IntangibleCanvas: Free-Air Finger Painting on a Projected Canvas, CHI EA '11 Extended Abstracts, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1615-1620, ACM, New York, May 7-12, 2011. |
Moeller et al., “ZeroTouch: A Zero-Thickness Optical Multi-Touch Force Field”, CHI EA '11 Extended Abstracts, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1165-1170. ACM, New York, NY, May 7-12, 2011. |
Myers et al., “Two-Handed Input Using a PDA and a Mouse”, CHI '2000, CHI Letters, vol. 2 Issue 1, pp. 41-48, ACM, New York, NY, 2000. |
Myers, “Using Handhelds and PCs Together,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 34-41, ACM New York, NY, Nov. 2001. |
Myers, “Mobile Devices for Control”, Mobile HCI 2002, LNCS 2411, pp. 1-8, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150015522 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61564868 | Nov 2011 | US | |
61169779 | Apr 2009 | US | |
61171464 | Apr 2009 | US | |
61317255 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14331288 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 14499190 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13854074 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14331288 | US | |
Parent | 13424592 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13854074 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12760568 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13424592 | US | |
Parent | 12371609 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 12760568 | US | |
Parent | 10494055 | US | |
Child | 12371609 | US |