Finger-type peristaltic pump comprising a ribbed anvil

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8337168
  • Patent Number
    8,337,168
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 13, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 25, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
The present invention discloses a finer-type peristaltic infusion pump comprising a ribbed anvil. More specifically, a finger-type peristaltic pump, comprising a plurality of pressing-fingers, infusion-tube, and a passive interfacing mechanism is disclosed. The passive interfacing mechanism comprises of means for accommodating said flexible infusion tube and mounting the tube in a location suitable for the pressing-fingers to apply an approximated perpendicular force on said tube to squeeze it; a ribbed anvil rigidly supporting the tube on opposite side to the pressing fingers when it is pressed by said finger; said anvil comprising a plurality of ribs selected from one or more ribs of a group including a plurality of ribs oriented to face said fingers' tip, a plurality of ribs located in between said fingers, or any combination thereof.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to a finer-type peristaltic infusion pump comprising a ribbed anvil rigidly accepting a flexible infusion tube when it is pressed by a pressing-finger


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a design using ribs on the pumping substrate of a peristaltic pump. At present peristaltic pumps find use in medical settings to add nutrients to blood, to force blood through filters to clean it as in dialysis, or to move blood through the body and lungs during open heart surgery. They are advantageous in these situations since the pump elements do not contact the pumped fluid, eliminating any possibility of contamination. Additionally the pumping action is gentle enough that blood cells are not damaged. Further uses include pumping aggressive chemicals, high solids slurries and other materials where isolation of the product from the environment, and the environment from the product, are critical. As the operation of such a pump can be critical for life support, they are generally provided with battery back up. The efficiency of the device thus becomes an important parameter since the length of time it can remain in operation while on battery power is limited by its efficiency.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is thus the object of the present invention to provide a finer-type peristaltic pump (DDS) comprising a plurality of pressing-fingers, infusion-tube, and a passive interface mechanism; wherein this passive interface mechanism comprising (a) a means for accommodating said flexible infusion tube and mounting the same in a location suitable for said pressing-fingers to apply an approximated tangential force on said tube to squeeze it; (b) a ribbed anvil rigidly accepting said flexible tube when it is pressed by said finger; and further wherein said anvil comprising one or more of the following (i) a plurality of ribs facing said fingers' tip, (ii) a plurality of ribs located in between said fingers, or (iii) any combination thereof.


Another object is to provide a DDS as defined above, wherein one or more of said ribs is of a different height as compared with others ribs (reference ribs), so as the squeezed volume of the infused fluid per pumping cycle provided by said one or more ribs is either bigger or smaller height as compared with squeezed volume provided by said reference ribs.


Another object is to provide a DDS as defined above, wherein one or more of said ribs is of a different width as compared with others ribs (reference ribs), so as less pressing force is required by a given finger for shutting off said infusion tube against narrower ribs as compared with reference ribs, and vice versa, more pressing force is required by a given finger for shutting off said infusion tube against wider ribs as compared with reference ribs.


Another object is to provide a DDS as defined above, especially adapted to provide optimization means for calibrating each finger's force requirements per single pumping cycle by widening or narrowing adjacent rib's width.


Another object is to provide a DDS as defined above, wherein one or more of said ribs is of a different specifications: namely width and/or profile characteristics as compared with others ribs (reference ribs), in the manner that less pressing force is required by a given finger for shutting off said infusion tube against said ribs as compared with said reference ribs, so as minimized tube's degradation is provided due to continuous shutting off of the flexible tube by said fingers pressing tips.


Another object is to provide a method of obtaining a predetermined flow capacity, comprising of obtaining a DDS as defined in any of the above; and adjusting the specifications one or more of said ribs, namely altering its width and/or profile characteristics, hence accepting a respectively wide range of infusion-tubes types, flexibility, conditions and diameters, with no requirement of controlling pump's pumping parameters





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be implemented in practice, a plurality of preferred embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which



FIG. 1 schematically illustrating an out-of-scale and simplified lateral cross-section of tube pressing mechanism in a finger-type infusion-pump according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 schematically illustrating a detailed lateral cross-section of the pressing fingers and infusion tube in an infusion-pump according to one embodiment of the present invention; and,



FIG. 3 schematically illustrating two out-of-scale and simplified lateral cross-sections of a pressing mechanism as defined above; higher view comprises of a non-ribbed anvil (prior art), and lower view comprises ribbed-anvil according to one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is provided, alongside all chapters of the present invention, so as to enable any person skilled in the art to make use of said invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out this invention. Various modifications, however, will remain apparent to those skilled in the art, since the generic principles of the present invention have been defined specifically to provide a finer-type peristaltic pump comprising a ribbed anvil rigidly accepting a flexible infusion tube when it is pressed by a pressing-finger.


The term ‘plurality’ refers hereinafter to any integer number equal or higher 1, e.g., 2 to 10, especially 2 to 4.


The present invention pertains to finger-type peristaltic pump (DDS) that utilizes a passive mechanical interface adapted to incorporate a set of infusion tubing with a pumping mechanism and various sensors, wherein the back portion of the mechanical interface is provided as an anvil accepting those M pressing fingers.


The term passive interface relates to a mechanical interface of the set tubing to the DDS that has no moving parts or static members being an integral part of the aforesaid pumping mechanism of sensors thereof, e.g., pistols, hinges, cams, wheels, sealing membranes, gaskets etc. A plurality of N ribs is located inside said back-portion of the interface. A portion of the ribs (n1) is located below the fingers tips, and a portion (n2) is located in between those fingers. N and M are any integer numbers, wherein n1 is either equal or different then n2. It is acknowledged in this respect that according to one possible embodiment of the present invention, no ribs are located under the fingers. The ribs provide useful means for calibrating the flowing volume in said tube in each pumping cycle. The ribs further provide useful means for an individual calibration of the force requires by each of the pressing fingers to complete shutoff of the infusion tube. The ribs further allow optimization of the energy consumes to shutoff the tube and the energy requires allowing fluids flow in said tube. The ribs also provide useful means for minimizing degradation of the infusion tube, especially by optimizing the surfaces of the finger tips continuously pressing the tube. Moreover, the present invention also provides useful means for energy optimization. Lastly, the ribs facilitate the immobilization the infusion tube by mechanical interface of the pressing fingers, e.g., to approach a relatively wide range of tubes (diameter, elasticity, regulatory of the surface etc) so as a constant volume of fluid is pumped per a given pumping cycle.


Controlling the volume of fluid is pumped per a given pumping cycle: Reference is now made to FIGS. 1 and 2, wherein FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an out of scale lateral cross section of an infusion tube (1), wherein a perpendicular peristaltic finger (2) is reversibly mounted and pressing the same so as a measurable volume of fluid (3) is squeezed due to the tube's shutoff. Hence, squeezed volume (3) is regulated by the pressing finger (2). Some of the fluid (3) is pressed upstream and some is pressed downstream. The volume of upstream pressed fluid (against an adjacent tube's shutoff provided by a neighboring pressing finger) is dependent on the flexibility of the tube and on the existence of rigid envelops accommodating the tube and restricting its inflation. It is acknowledged in this respect that in an extreme case, a very flexible tube is utilized; the diameter of this flexible tube is not restricted by a rigid envelope, so as by providing a high pressure zone downstream to the press, most of the fluid is pressed backwards and not forwards. It is hence in the scope of the present invention wherein regulation of geometry of the mechanical interface of a finger-type peristaltic pumps, tube's inflation can be regulate and backwards flow of fluid at each pumping cycle can be avoided. As a result, one can optimize the volume of fluid to be pump per a given pumping cycle and minimize losses obtained by upstream flow of the fluid.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an out-of-scale lateral cross section of a finger-type peristaltic pump that comprises a plurality of 4 fingers being rotatably mounted perpendicular to an infusion tube. A mechanical interface (21) avoids inflation of the tube along the pumping and provides exact regulation of the volume of the squeezed fluid at each pumping cycle. By determining the measurements of the ribs (22) under the pressing fingers, an exact calibration of the force require to shutoff the tube by each finger (23) is provided.


Optimization of Energy Requires to Shutoff the Infusion Tube vs Energy Requires to Facilitate a Fluid Flow Thorough This Tube


The pumping fingers are adapted to apply an approximately perpendicular force on the flexible infusion tube to squeeze it, so as one of its walls will bend and touch the opposite wall and fluids flow will shutoff. In theory a continues contact line between the tube walls will produce a complete shutoff, however grater force is needed to produces a pressure—on the tube walls—high enough to overcome tube's surface irregularities. It is acknowledged that smaller pressing area in the aforesaid tube's shutoff location requires less force. Upper zoomed-in scheme presents a case of the prior art whereat pressing-forces are spread upon the flexible tube, more area is to be squeezed and hence stronger forces are to be applied; wherein lower zoomed-in scheme presents a case according to one embodiment of the present invention wherein pressing forces are focused towards the rib and less force is required for complete shut off of the infusion tube.


Reference is now made to FIG. 3, schematically illustrating out-of-scale lateral cross sections of pressing mechanism of finger-type peristaltic pumps that comprise a pressing-finger (2) which presses tube (3) towards an anvil (4) at a given pressing area (1). Higher illustrations present a plain anvil (4) (See also wide pressing area at the zooming view on the right); wherein lower illustrations present a ribbed anvil with respectively narrow pressing area at the zooming view on the right.


It is in the scope of the invention wherein the capacity of the flow can be calibrated, e.g., by adjusting the width or other proportions of one or more ribs. Similarly, the force which is required to provide an optimal flow capacity can be calibrated and adjusted. The proportions of length and width of ribs under the pressing fingers, rib's profile and cross sections, as well as other dimensions of the rids in the passive interface mechanism, allow the optimization of capacity to flow ratio. The height of the ribs under the pressing fingers provides for calibration of the sealing properties of eh mechanism. A method of calibrating the fluid's flow capacity is also disclosed, and comprised of steps of adjusting the proportions of the ribs under the pressing fingers as defined above.

Claims
  • 1. A finger-type peristaltic pump (DDS), comprising a plurality of pressing-fingers, a tube, and a passive interfacing mechanism; wherein said passive interfacing mechanism comprises (a) a channel for accommodating said tube and mounting said tube in a location suitable for said pressing-fingers to apply substantially perpendicular force on said tube; (b) a ribbed anvil rigidly supporting said tube on opposite side to said pressing fingers, wherein said anvil includes at least one fixed protruding rib located at a defined position relative to at least one of said fingers; and wherein by changing the heights of one or more of said ribs it is possible to calibrate the squeezed volume of the infused fluid per pumping cycle, said squeezed volume is defined by ribs of a nominal height, so as the ratio between squeezed volume per revolution and the speed of the pumping mechanism can be calibrated.
  • 2. The finger-type peristaltic pump according to claim 1, wherein one or more of said ribs is of a different width as compared with others ribs (reference ribs), so as less pressing force is required by a given finger for shutting off said infusion-tube against narrower ribs, as compared with reference ribs of wider width, and vice versa, more force is required for pressing said tube by a given finger against wider ribs as compared with reference narrower ribs.
  • 3. The finger-type peristaltic pump according to claim 1, wherein one or more of said ribs is of a different width as compared with others ribs (reference ribs), so as squeezed volume of the infused fluid per pumping cycle can be calibrated.
  • 4. The peristaltic pump of claim 1, wherein said anvil includes one or more fixed protruding ribs between said pressing fingers to achieve a predetermined flow rate through the tube.
  • 5. The peristaltic pump of claim 1, wherein said anvil includes one or more fixed protruding ribs substantially across from one or more of said fingers tips to decrease the force required by pressing fingers to close the tube.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
179231 Nov 2006 IL national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/IL2007/001398 11/13/2007 WO 00 5/10/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2008/059492 5/22/2008 WO A
US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
2056322 Hoppe Oct 1936 A
2743898 King May 1956 A
3443585 Reinicke May 1969 A
3982722 Bernard Sep 1976 A
3982725 Clark Sep 1976 A
4014318 Dockum et al. Mar 1977 A
4039269 Pickering Aug 1977 A
4155362 Jess May 1979 A
4236880 Archibald Dec 1980 A
4270532 Franetzki et al. Jun 1981 A
4320781 Bouvet et al. Mar 1982 A
4450375 Siegal May 1984 A
4489863 Horchos et al. Dec 1984 A
4682135 Yamakawa Jul 1987 A
4728265 Cannon Mar 1988 A
4741736 Brown May 1988 A
4893991 Heminway et al. Jan 1990 A
4978335 Arthur, III Dec 1990 A
5096385 Georgi et al. Mar 1992 A
5103211 Daoud et al. Apr 1992 A
5152680 Okada Oct 1992 A
5165874 Sancoff et al. Nov 1992 A
5213483 Flaherty et al. May 1993 A
5222946 Kamen Jun 1993 A
5257978 Haber et al. Nov 1993 A
5290158 Okada Mar 1994 A
5395320 Padda et al. Mar 1995 A
5429485 Dodge Jul 1995 A
5499969 Beuchat et al. Mar 1996 A
5509439 Tantardini Apr 1996 A
5527295 Wing Jun 1996 A
5575309 Connell Nov 1996 A
5577891 Loughnane et al. Nov 1996 A
5593134 Steber et al. Jan 1997 A
5658252 Johnson Aug 1997 A
5683233 Moubayed et al. Nov 1997 A
5782805 Meinzer et al. Jul 1998 A
5807322 Lindsey et al. Sep 1998 A
5896076 Van Namen Apr 1999 A
5996964 Ben-Shalom Dec 1999 A
6095189 Ben-Shalom Aug 2000 A
6164921 Moubayed et al. Dec 2000 A
6165874 Powell et al. Dec 2000 A
6203296 Ray et al. Mar 2001 B1
6213739 Phallen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6261262 Briggs et al. Jul 2001 B1
6339410 Milner et al. Jan 2002 B1
6371732 Moubayed et al. Apr 2002 B1
6450773 Upton Sep 2002 B1
6537244 Paukovits et al. Mar 2003 B2
6692241 Watanabe et al. Feb 2004 B2
6733476 Christenson et al. May 2004 B2
7018361 Gillespie, Jr. et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022075 Grunwald et al. Apr 2006 B2
7122026 Rogers et al. Oct 2006 B2
7163385 Gharib et al. Jan 2007 B2
20020156402 Woog et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165503 Morris et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030040700 Hickle et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030182586 Numano Sep 2003 A1
20040181314 Zaleski Sep 2004 A1
20040191112 Hill et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050088409 Van Berkel Apr 2005 A1
20060051218 Harttig Mar 2006 A1
20060083644 Zumbrum et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070269324 Goldor et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080095649 Ben-Shalom et al. Apr 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
10118086 Jul 2002 DE
0215249 Mar 1987 EP
0225158 Jun 1987 EP
2632529 Dec 1989 FR
60043188 Mar 1985 JP
6-169992 Jun 1994 JP
2002-57738 Feb 2002 JP
2004141418 May 2004 JP
9116933 Nov 1991 WO
03027503 Apr 2003 WO
2008059493 May 2008 WO
2008059494 May 2008 WO
2008059495 May 2008 WO
2008059496 May 2008 WO
2008059498 May 2008 WO
2008059499 May 2008 WO
2008130644 Oct 2008 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090317268 A1 Dec 2009 US