The present invention relates to a fingernail polish protection device for use in protecting wet fingernail polish while it is drying. In particular, the invention relates to a device having an adjustable ring member and a ventilated shield member, wherein the ventilated shield protects the fingernail polish while allowing air circulation to help the polish dry.
Previously, it has been well known to attach coverings or protective devices to fingers to protect wet fingernail polish or paint as it dries. However, the devices heretofore known lacked all of the attributes necessary to be wholly effective. Accordingly, few of the prior known devices have ever been introduced into the mass market, as they were visually unappealing, expensive to manufacture, and subject to several practical disadvantages.
Many of the previously known devices were difficult to use. For example, if a device is too bulky (i.e., too long and/or too wide or thick), it is awkward to affix to the fingers, particularly since fingernails are often polished in a set, meaning that such devices are placed on adjacent fingers By way of example, prior designs which appear to be extremely difficult to use include the ones described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,458,709 entitled Fingernail Guard which issued to J. H. Kayer on Jan. 11, 1949 and in U.S. Pat. No. 2,557,759 entitled Fingernail Polish Guard which issued to L. Pfister on Jun. 19, 1951.
Also, such devices can be uncomfortable to wear. By way of example, devices which incorporate semi-circular rings or clips can pinch the fingers and cause swelling, discomfort, and loss of circulation. Such devices are described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,297,807 entitled Fingernail Bonnet which issued to F. Sommers on Oct. 6, 1942; U.S. Pat. No. 2,323,854 entitled Fingernail Guard which issued to S. Silverman on Jul. 6, 1943; U.S. Pat. No. 2,546,619 entitled Fingernail Guard which issued to H. H. Turner on Mar. 27, 1951; U.S. Pat. No. 4,089,066 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to M. L Dethman on May 16, 1978; U.S. Pat. No. 4,966,174 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to J. J. Stanczak on Oct. 30, 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,276 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to M. Preziose on Feb. 1, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,243 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to C. A. Simonton on Jul. 30, 1996; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/102,124 entitled Nail Protection Apparatus which was published by L. Giachetti as US2009/0255545A1 on Oct. 15, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/422,380 entitled Nail Protection Apparatus which was published by L. Giachetti as US2009/0255545A1 on Oct. 15, 2009. As will be obvious to those skilled in the art, if the device is uncomfortable, in addition to potentially experiencing injury, the wearer will not be able to achieve the full benefit of the device as they may have to remove it before their fingernails are completely dry.
Other devices, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,179,046 entitled Fingernail Polish Protector which issued to H. B. Lewis on Nov. 7, 1939 and in U.S. Pat. No. 3,967,631 entitled Fingernail Cap which issued to K. M. Kosal on Jul. 6, 1976, were ill-fitting and not adjustable. Further, such devices extended over the tip of the finger, whereby the wearer's ability to use her finger was highly diminished, while the devices described had a fixed length whereby the length of a wearer's fingernail had to be limited by the device's configuration.
Many of the devices of the prior art were ill-fitting, as they cannot be sized to the exact dimensions of the wearer's finger. Accordingly, absent some way to customize the ring fitting, such devices were uncomfortable to wear, as a too tight device would pinch and cut off circulation, resulting in discomfort, while devices where were too loose would move about, allowing their “protective” portion to tilt downward onto the fingernail, thereby damaging the freshly painted fingernails which they were intended to protect.
While the issue of customizable sizing was addressed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,089,066 of M. L. Dethman (See, above) and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,816 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to C. A. Banes, et al. on Dec. 23, 1997, neither of those disclosures taught anything about separating the shield portion of a fingernail polish protector from the adjustable portion (“the ring portion”). Accordingly, while those inventions addressed the issue of customizable fit and finger comfort associated with making a fingernail polish protection device, neither of them addressed the issues of polish protection, ventilation, or overall fit, all of which are required to have a truly viable fingernail polish protection device.
In that the prior known devices failed to provide for ventilation needed to promote the drying and curing of the fingernail polish they were inadequate to accomplish the result required. Thus, such devices as those shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,816 of C. A. Banes, et al. (See, above); U.S. Pat. No. 2,487,101 entitled Fingernail Protector which issued to R. E. Colby, et al. on Nov. 8, 1949; U.S. Pat. No. 4,972,857 entitled Fingernail Polish Protector which issued to L. A. Stewart, et al. on Nov. 27, 1990; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,934 entitled Fingernail Guard which issued to N. E. Jefferson on May 19, 1987. As will be readily understood, designs that do not incorporate ventilation slits or holes at least partially mask the fingernail, typically resulting in increased drying time.
Many of the prior known devices prevent mobility, requiring the wearer to remain stationary while the fingernails dry. Such devices do not offer much benefit as compared to a person who simply remains stationary without wearing any type of protective device. Prior designs which appear to inhibit wearer mobility include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,251,551 entitled Nail Polish Protector which issued to M. B. O'Reilly on Aug. 5, 1941; in U.S. Pat. No. 2,179,046 (See, above); and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,116 entitled Fingernail Protection Device which issued to H. A. Copeland on Oct. 16, 2001.
Unlike the designs of the prior art, the present invention is a fingernail polish protector which is comfortable to wear, as it includes an easily adjustable ring portion. It also includes a detachable, tiltable polish protector which includes ventilation openings, whereby the fingernail polish is protected, yet it is able to receive air flow to dry properly.
In addition to providing an improved and marketable form of a fingernail polish protector, the invention provides a fingernail protector that effectively and comfortably protects wet fingernail polish as it dries. The current invention thus provides for a proper fit, allows ventilation for the drying process, and it is easy to use, while permitting the wearer to use her hands and fingers while wearing the device.
This invention comprises novel details of construction and novel combinations of parts. Other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed disclosure, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts.
In the drawing:
Referring to
In accordance with the invention, the preferred embodiment 10 includes a ring portion 14 and a shield portion 16. Unlike the known prior art, the ring portion 14 is highly adjustable, yet easily removable, while the shield portion 16 is tiltably adjustable to provide both protection to, and clearance from, the wearer's fingernail 15.
With reference to
At the distal end 23 of the second arcuate section 18 a forked portion 27 is formed, whereby an elongated opening 28, extending between an inner portion 30 and an outer portion 32, is formed therein. As shown in
To assist movement and removal of the slideable member 22, a release 36 is formed at the distal end of the outer portion 32, whereby the release 36 can be used to urge the ridged portions 24, 34 apart, so that the arcuate sections 16, 18 can be adjusted to be either tighter or looser, as desired, on the wearer's finger 12.
With continued reference to
As shown in
With reference, now, to
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, both the ring portion 14 and the shield portion 16 are readily manufactured using standard plastic molding techniques, whereby they are relatively inexpensive to produce, and whereby they are well suited for mass production. Further, as the parts 14, 16 are preferably made of plastic material, they can be formed in a variety of colors. Also, the ventilation openings, while formed in the shape of flower petals 66 in the preferred embodiment 10, can be any shape which allows for air flow to assist in the drying and curing of the polish on the fingernail 15.
In view of the design of the overall present fingernail polish protector, the ring portion 14 is easily adjustable to be readily, and comfortably, worn for sufficient time to permit the full curing of the underlying fingernail polish. At the same time, the tiltable shield portion 16 provides an attractive protector, yet allows for air circulation. The fact that the shield portion 16 can be snapped into position, as described, means that the manufacturing process can include a variety of ring portions 14 and interchangeable shield portions 16 of various sizes, shapes, colors, and configurations without departing from the present invention, and the tiltable aspect of the shield portion 16 means that shield portion above the fingernail can be tilted independently of the adjustment to the ring portion 14 on the wearer's finger 12. Accordingly, the shield portion 16 can be moved from an upward tilt “painting” or “open” position to a “protection” or “closed” mode, with the hexagonal shaped axle 60 of the preferred embodiment acting to stop the tilt in various positions.
While the present invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments, the inventors do not intend to restrict the description to the examples shown. Persons skilled in the art will recognize that the above designs and improvements may be modified or changed without departing from the general scope of this description. The inventors specifically intend to include all such modifications and alterations in so far as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
The present application claims the priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/278,720, filed Oct. 13, 2009 entitled POLISH PROTECTORS.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
293831 | Wickers | Feb 1884 | A |
945107 | Moodey | Jan 1910 | A |
1995772 | Jacobs | Mar 1935 | A |
2179046 | Lewis | Nov 1939 | A |
2251551 | O'Reilly | Aug 1941 | A |
2297807 | Sommers | Oct 1942 | A |
2487101 | Colby et al. | Nov 1949 | A |
2546619 | Turner | Mar 1951 | A |
3543535 | Siegel et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3913187 | Okuda | Oct 1975 | A |
3930510 | Johnston | Jan 1976 | A |
4089066 | Dethman | May 1978 | A |
4183120 | Thorne | Jan 1980 | A |
4615464 | Byrns | Oct 1986 | A |
4881301 | Sweeney et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4935992 | Due | Jun 1990 | A |
4966174 | Stanczak | Oct 1990 | A |
4984592 | Hellein | Jan 1991 | A |
5085234 | Silverman | Feb 1992 | A |
5186189 | Harris | Feb 1993 | A |
5216784 | Dyer | Jun 1993 | A |
5232436 | Janevski | Aug 1993 | A |
5282276 | Preiose | Feb 1994 | A |
5540243 | Simonton | Jul 1996 | A |
5699816 | Banes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5743277 | Moreshead | Apr 1998 | A |
5803094 | Becker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5924428 | Song | Jul 1999 | A |
6085550 | Ishida | Jul 2000 | A |
6266852 | Tai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6490886 | Steinhauer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6926363 | Yamashita | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7107789 | Bruner | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7284302 | Lares | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7685683 | Coles et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020059940 | Cain-Kozma | May 2002 | A1 |
20030177787 | Kuo | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20090308103 | Chang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110108045 | Racz | May 2011 | A1 |
20110179823 | Moody | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61278720 | Oct 2009 | US |