This invention relates generally to emergency egress, and in particular, to a vertical acting emergency egress with simultaneous fire/smoke barrier protection using a fabric door.
By code, buildings such as industrial, school and public buildings require fire and smoke barrier opening protectives. They also require emergency egress capability. Due to the simplistic operation and known designs of swing door exit hardware, side-hinged swinging doors are commonly used to simultaneously accomplish both.
However, code rated side-hinged swinging doors are not always the desired design choice to meet code requirements. For structures needing higher occupancy load egress and fire/smoke protection requirements, multiple swing doors and/or banks of swing doors and their associated frame assemblies are used. The framing requirements of multiple doors and/or banks of doors present architectural challenges for building designers.
In an attempt to overcome these challenges, a variety of door designs have been developed. One known design uses up to two swinging fire door and frame assemblies that store in pockets perpendicular to the opening. A second known design includes a bank of swinging fire door and frame assemblies that are attached to the bottom of a coiling door. Although these designs include commonly accepted side-hinge swinging doors, they require significantly more head or side room clearances and cost more to manufacture than earlier designs.
Another known design uses commonly accepted side-hinge swinging doors in an accordion folding fire door configuration. However, this design requires side stack space for the folded accordion door and non-folding side-hinge swinging door(s). Because occupancy load determines the amount of door opening/number of required doors, each required side-hinge swinging door mandates additional side stack space, thereby reducing the overall free space and presenting construction challenges.
Another known design uses accordion folding fire doors with an integral DC power supply and curtain mounted egress activation hardware that causes electric opening of the door for egress. The speed of clearing the opening must be coordinated with the building occupant load and required egress opening width within 10 seconds of egress hardware activation. These doors mandate ample side room to store the accordion folding fire door and operating system
Accordingly, there remains a continuing need for improved combined emergency egress and fire/smoke barrier designs. The present invention fulfills this need and further provides related advantages.
The fire and smoke rated fabric door described below presents a novel alternative to side-hinged swinging doors and offers access to an egress opening width needed to meet occupancy egress requirements while simultaneously qualifying as a fire/smoke barrier.
A vertically coiling fabric door assembly is used for smoke and fire protection for vertical openings in, for example, elevator hoistway door and frame assemblies, elevator lobbies and at the intersection of the elevator lobby and fire rated or non-fire rated corridors.
Intended uses include, for example, compliance with the 2012, 2009 and 2006 International Building Code® (IBC), NFPA 80, NFPA 72, NFPA 101, NFPA 105, and The 2012, 2009 and 2006 International Fire Code, all incorporated by reference.
For example, the fabric fire door can be used as an alternative to the requirement for an enclosed elevator lobby in accordance with Exception 3 of 2012 IBC Section 713.14.1, 2009 IBC Section 708.14.1 and 2006 IBC Section 707.14.1, all incorporated by reference, when installed over elevator openings equipped with a fire rated elevator hoistway door and frame assembly.
The fabric fire door may also be used as an alternative to the requirement for an enclosed elevator lobby in accordance with Exception 5 of 2012 IBC Section 713.14.1, 2009 IBC Section 708.14.1 and 2006 IBC Section 707.14.1, all incorporated by reference, when installed remotely from elevator openings at the intersection of the elevator lobby and a non-fire rated corridor.
Additionally, the fabric fire door may be used as an alternative to the requirement for an enclosed elevator lobby in accordance with 2012 IBC Section 713.14.1, 2009 IBC Section 708.14.1 and 2006 IBC Section 707.14.1, all incorporated by reference, when installed remotely from elevator openings at the intersection of the elevator lobby and a fire rated corridor.
The fabric fire door may also be used as a smoke barrier when an elevator lobby is used as an area of refuge in accordance with 2012, 2009 and 2006 IBC Section 1007.6, all incorporated by reference.
Furthermore, the fabric fire door may also be used as an alternative to the smoke and draft control doors required by 2012 IBC Section 710.5.2.2, 2009 IBC Section 711.5.22006 IBC Section 710.5.2, all incorporated by reference.
The fire and smoke rated fabric door has demonstrated a fire-resistance rating of about 60 minutes for openings in approved construction up to about 12 feet wide by about 11 feet 6 inches tall (about 3657.6 mm×about 3505.2 mm) and up to about 138 square feet (about 12.82 m2) in area. The door complies as a smoke- and draft-control assembly in accordance with 2012 IBC Section 716.5.3, 2009 IBC Section 715.4.3 and 2006 IBC Section 715.4.3, all incorporated by reference.
The fire and smoke rated fabric door is applicable for use in shaft enclosures in accordance with 2012 IBC Section 713.7, 2009 IBC Section 708.7 and 2006 IBC Section 708.6; for use in smoke barrier walls in accordance with 2012 IBC Section 709.5, 2009 IBC Section 710.5 and 2006 IBC Section 709.5; and for use in smoke partition walls in accordance with 2012 IBC Section 710.5, 2009 IBC Section 711.5 and 2006 IBC Section 710.5, all incorporated by reference.
Such configurations allow building designers the ability to reduce the construction costs and aesthetic problems associated with conventional fire/emergency egress doors.
Yet another advantage is the ability to obtain a 60 minute, non-hose stream fire rating.
Another advantage is the ability to allow manual egress of the entire width of the curtain in the vertical direction.
Still another advantage is the ability of side guide rails to match up cleanly with either elevator hoistway framing or for FOW or BJ guides for elevator lobby or cross corridor openings.
Yet another advantage is the elimination of side-hinged swing door mullions and header construction, thereby allowing for unobstructed paths of egress.
When compared to pocket width requirements for horizontal sliding egress fire doors and head room requirements for rolling doors with attached side-hinged swinging doors, the door requires minimal head and side room clearances.
Still another advantage is that the door can remain fully out of egress paths during normal conditions, thereby providing fewer tendencies with which to be tampered.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the present invention. These drawings are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
a is a front view of the fire and smoke rated fabric door.
b is a perspective view of the fire and smoke rated fabric door.
a and 7b are a side views of a collapsible bottom bar profile.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various forms. The figures are not necessary to scale, and some features may be exaggerated to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
For purposes of this disclosure, the term “fabric” is meant to include any material capable of achieving a curtain requiring no more than codified emergency egress requirements of lifting force as described below.
Turning to the figures, the fire and smoke rated fabric door 2 is a vertically coiling smoke and fire containment system that is comprised of a fire resistant curtain 4, for example, a silica fabric curtain, vertically oriented side members 6, for example, vertical steel guide rails, a counterbalance assembly 8 and an operational assembly 10. The counterbalance assembly 8 and operational assembly 10 are preferably contained within an overhead coil box 12. The curtain 4 is, for example, a 2.5-mil-thick silica cloth curtain coated with a urethane based resin on one side with panels 14 stitched together horizontally with twisted stainless steel threads.
The counterbalance assembly 8 comprises a counterbalance barrel 16, for example, a shaft, which is supported above the opening and secured at each end by a securing member 18, for example, a bracket or end plate. The curtain 4 directly attaches to the shaft 16 and rolls onto and off of the shaft 16 as the shaft is rotated by the operational assembly 10. The curtain travels within the vertically oriented side members 6, within which the outer edges 20 of the curtain are contained and guided. In a preferred embodiment, each curtain outer edge 20 comprises a side geometry which is mechanically locked within the vertically oriented side member 6.
The operational assembly 10 (
The operational assembly 10 is designed to function under normal or test conditions with a secured or unsecured Open/Close/Stop station. The controller 24 is programmed to automatically deploy the curtain 4 upon entering an alarm condition, for example, receiving notification from a building fire alarm control panel, local fire and/or smoke detection appliances, or upon a pre-determined reduction of available power, for example, DC battery power.
Upon notification, the operator 22 will delay release of the curtain 4 for a predetermined time period, for example, about ten seconds, and then release the releasing device 26, for example, a holding brake, activating the curtain 4 to deploy by gravity at a predetermined rate, for example, to between about 6″ and about 24″ per second, per NFPA 80, incorporated by reference.
If the curtain 4 encounters an obstruction (not shown) the curtain 4 stops and rests at the obstruction. Once the obstruction is removed, the descent to full closure will continue by gravity. When the bottom edge of the curtain (bottom bar 52,
Occupants requiring emergency egress can lift the curtain 4 at any time and from any position with an integral handle 40 (
Ideally, the activation of egress must be easily understandable and achievable during emergency condition. To address these concerns, a power egress and a manual egress feature are activated in the same manner, for example, by grabbing the handle 40 and lifting in the vertical direction. Shown in
Logic is written into the controller 24 that activates power egress once upward motion is detected. Thus, if power is available, once an individual grabs the curtain handle 40 and begins to lift the curtain 4, the operator motor will take over, raise the curtain 4 to a predetermined height, pause for a predetermined duration, and then allow the curtain 4 to close. If no power is available, the individual grabs the curtain handle 40 and lifts the curtain 4 in the same manner, only without assistance of the drive motor assembly 30. Known metal coiling doors are too heavy to be lifted manually during an alarm condition.
During an alarm condition, if the curtain 4 billows it is possible that the billowing could cause the barrel 16 to rotate, thereby unintentionally activating the power egress and resulting in an unwanted door opening. This unwanted door opening could allow smoke and fire to pass whenever the door area experienced a significant change in pressure. To prevent this problem, logic is incorporated into the operational assembly 10 that factors the rotational direction and travel distance determined by the rotation sensor 42 to determine whether the motion is caused by a pressure difference or an individual trying to activate the egress feature.
The curtain 4 is counter balanced so that it gravity closes from any position, yet may be manually lifted to a specified egress height with a predetermined emergency egress lifting force, for example, less than about 15 pounds of lifting force. In a preferred embodiment, to achieve this balance for larger sized units, a torsion spring 44 is selected for each curtain 4 so that it balances the unit within the aforementioned guidelines.
When the curtain 4 is fabricated from material that is light and thin, standard torsion springs may not achieve the balance required for such smaller units. A counterweight system would be effective in this situation, but is not optimal due to size constraints. Optimally, as shown in
Once lifted, the curtain 4 will then re-deploy to a fully closed position after a predetermined time period, for example, about a ten second delay, as long as there remains an alarm condition notification. Once the alarm condition clears and power is restored, the curtain 4 will automatically retract to a fully open position.
Because the curtain 4 needs to be manually egressed with the predetermined emergency egress lifting force, for example, less than about 15 pounds of lifting force, and still gravity close from all positions, any added resistance to the operation of the curtain 4 makes obtaining this balance difficult. One major obstacle is having to backdrive through the operator 22 when moving the curtain 4. Failing to achieve the required balance may cause the curtain 4 to be too heavy to open (requiring greater than the emergency egress lifting force) or result in the curtain 4 not fully closing under an alarm condition.
To avoid having to backdrive through the operator 22, a ratcheting assembly 48 is incorporated into the drive motor assembly 30 (
The door 2 includes a back-up power supply 28, for example, battery back-up protection, and is designed to function fully as described above by back-up power during an interruption of the primary power supply. The door 2 will not activate to close during a primary power interruption unless an alarm condition notification is received, or until back-up power is reduced to a pre-determined level, at which time the curtain 4 will activate to deploy as described.
In the event that the back-up power supply 28 becomes discharged below a predefined power level, the curtain 4 will activate and deploy to the fully closed position by gravity. In any of the events described above, the curtain 4 remains capable of being manually lifted to any height with a force less than the emergency egress lifting force.
Because the door 2 is balanced to require only the emergency egress lifting force to open, the curtain 4 is susceptible to lifting and formation of a leakage gap 58 (
Shown in
A closing curtain without obstruction sensing equipment, even a lightweight slow-moving one such as the presently described fire and smoke rated fabric door, has the potential to make emergency egress more difficult. For example, if the curtain begins closing while individuals are still attempting to move through the opening, the curtain would require someone to hold it in an open position to maintain the egress opening until all individuals are cleared.
To overcome this problem the rotation sensor 42 distinguishes when the curtain 4 reaches the closed position or a predetermined down limit by sensing that the barrel 16 has stopped rotating for a predetermined duration of time, for example, about 1-2 seconds, whereupon a releasing device, for example, brake 60 is engaged. The brake 26 is held for a predetermined duration of time, for example, about 10 seconds, then the brake 60 is released to check and insure the down limit has been reached. It the barrel 16 does not rotate, the brake 60 is reengaged. If the barrel 16 does rotate, the operational assembly 10 allows the barrel 16 to continue rotating until it senses the barrel 16 has once again stopped rotation, for example, stoppage of about 1-2 seconds. This cycle is continued until confirmation is made that the down limit has been reached. In a preferred embodiment the confirmatory cycle is repeated 3 times.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with specific examples and embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is capable of other variations and modifications within its scope. For example, while a maximum lifting force of about 15 lbs. has been described, any lifting force that meets codified emergency egress requirements is contemplated.
These examples and embodiments are intended as typical of, rather than in any way limiting on, the scope of the present invention as presented in the appended claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/640,878 filed May 1, 2012 and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/034,096 filed Feb. 24, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1275168 | McCloud | Aug 1918 | A |
1332942 | Brunst | Mar 1920 | A |
2038523 | Cahill | Apr 1936 | A |
3685567 | Pemberton et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3755968 | Williams | Sep 1973 | A |
4130156 | Wardlaw | Dec 1978 | A |
4147197 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4379481 | Juner et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4386398 | Matsuoka et al. | May 1983 | A |
5134347 | Koleda | Jul 1992 | A |
5203392 | Shea | Apr 1993 | A |
5228492 | Jou | Jul 1993 | A |
5253693 | Marlatt et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5357183 | Lin | Oct 1994 | A |
5467559 | Owens | Nov 1995 | A |
5576581 | Iannuzzi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5850865 | Hsieh | Dec 1998 | A |
5896907 | Dever et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5969637 | Doppelt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6014307 | Crimmins | Jan 2000 | A |
6065525 | Wells | May 2000 | A |
6155324 | Elliott et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6484784 | Weik et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7138912 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7299847 | Evans | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7343958 | East et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7591102 | Evans | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7878230 | Daus et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8037922 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069896 | Magro | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091604 | Kluck | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8397787 | Daus et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8651164 | Klish et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8806806 | Leivenzon et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8907608 | Krupke et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20080250716 | Ranaudo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100115853 | Gebhart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100242364 | Magro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243175 | Gonzales et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110282496 | Hsu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120297684 | Bresson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130042530 | Leivenzon et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140246154 | Dawdy | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140305599 | Pimenov | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305600 | Casey et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140318719 | Hsieh | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140345812 | Casey et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130228289 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61640878 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13034096 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13864433 | US |