Fire and water resistant expansion joint system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8887473
  • Patent Number
    8,887,473
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 15, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A fire resistant and water resistant expansion joint system comprises a compressed lamination of fire retardant infused open celled foam, one coat of an elastomeric waterproofing or water resistant material on the lamination, and another coat of an intumescent material on an opposing surface of the lamination, thereby providing fire resistance in one direction and water resistance in the opposite direction. The intumescent material may be further coated with a similar elastomeric material, thereby providing fire resistance in one direction and water resistance in both directions. In the alternative, the compressed lamination may comprise first and second opposing layers of intumescent material thereon each having a respective layer of elastomeric material to provide both water resistance and fire resistance in both directions.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to joint systems for use in architectural applications and, more particularly, to an expansion joint system for use in building and construction systems.


BACKGROUND

Building and construction applications in which materials such as concrete, metal, and glass are used typically employ joint systems that accommodate thermal and/or seismic movements of the various materials thereof and/or intentional movement of various elements relative to each other. These joint systems may be positioned to extend through both the interior and exterior surfaces (e.g., walls, floors, and roofs) of a building or other structure. In the case of an exterior joint in an exterior wall, roof, or floor exposed to external environmental conditions, the joint system should also, to some degree, resist the effects of such conditions. As such, most exterior joints are designed to resist the effects of water. In particular, vertically-oriented exterior joints are designed to resist water in the form of rain, snow, ice, or debris that is driven by wind. Horizontally-oriented joints are designed to resist water in the form of rain, standing water, snow, ice, debris such as sand, and in some circumstances all of these at the same time. Additionally, some horizontal systems may be subjected to pedestrian and/or vehicular traffic and are designed to withstand such traffic.


In the case of interior joints, water tightness aspects are less of an issue than they are in exterior joints, and so products are often designed simply to accommodate building movement. However, interior horizontal joints may also be subject to pedestrian traffic and in some cases vehicular traffic as well.


It has been generally recognized that building joint systems are deficient with respect to fire resistance. In some instances, movement as a result of building joint systems has been shown to create chimney effects which can have consequences with regard to fire containment. This often results in the subversion of fire resistive elements that may be incorporated into the construction of a building. This problem is particularly severe in large high-rise buildings, parking garages, and stadiums where fire may spread too rapidly to allow the structures to be evacuated.


Early designs for fire resistive joints included monolithic blocks of mineral wool or other inorganic materials of either monolithic or composite constructions either in combination with or without a field-applied liquid sealant. In general, these designs were adequate for non-moving joints or control joints where movements were very small. Where movements were larger and the materials were significantly compressed during the normal thermal expansion cycles of the building structure, these designs generally did not function as intended. Indeed, many designs simply lacked the resilience or recovery characteristics required to maintain adequate coverage of the entire joint width throughout the normal thermal cycle (expansion and contraction) that buildings experience. Many of these designs were tested in accordance with accepted standards such as ASTM E-119, which provides for fire exposure testing of building components under static conditions and does not take into account the dynamic nature of expansion joint systems. As described above, this dynamic behavior can contribute to the compromise of the fire resistance properties of some building designs.


Underwriters Laboratories developed UL 2079, a further refinement of ASTM E-119, by adding a cycling regimen to the test. Additionally, UL 2079 stipulates that the design be tested at the maximum joint size. This test is more reflective of real world conditions, and as such, architects and engineers have begun requesting expansion joint products that meet it. Many designs which pass ASTM E-119 without the cycling regime do not pass UL 2079. This may be adequate, as stated above, for non-moving building joints; however, most building expansion joint systems are designed to accommodate some movement as a result of thermal effects (e.g., expansion into the joint and contraction away from the joint) or as a result of seismic movement.


Both expansion joints and fire resistive expansion joints typically address either the water tightness aspects of the expansion joint system or the fire resistive nature of the expansion joint system, as described above, but not both.


Water resistant or water tight expansion joints exist in many forms, but in general they are constructed from materials designed to resist water penetration during the mechanical cycling caused by movement of the building due to thermal effects. These designs do not have fire resistant properties in a sufficient fashion to meet even the lowest fire rating standards. Indeed, many waterproofing materials act as fuel for any fire present, which can lead to a chimney effect that rapidly spreads fire throughout a building.


Conversely, many fire rated expansion joints do not have sufficient ability to resist water penetration to make them suitable for exterior applications. Many designs reliant upon mineral wool, ceramic materials and blankets, and intumescents, alone or in combination with each other, have compromised fire resistance if they come into contact with water. Additionally, as noted above, many fire rated designs cannot accommodate the mechanical cycling due to thermal effects without compromising the fire resistance.


This has resulted in the installation of two systems for each expansion joint where both a fire rating and water resistance is required. In many cases, there simply is not sufficient room in the physical space occupied by the expansion joint to accommodate both a fire rated system and a waterproofing system. In instances where the physical accommodation can be made, the resultant installation involves two products, with each product requiring its own crew of trained installers. Care is exercised such that one installation does not compromise the other.


Many systems also require on-site assembly to create a finished expansion joint system. This is arguably another weakness, as an incorrectly installed or constructed system may compromise fire and water resistance properties. In some cases, these fire resistant expansion joint systems are invasively anchored to the substrate (which may be concrete). Over time, the points at which such systems are anchored are subject to cracking and ultimately spalling, which may subvert the effectiveness of the fire resistance by simply allowing the fire to go around the fire resistant elements of the system.


Many expansion joint products do not fully consider the irregular nature of building expansion joints. It is quite common for an expansion joint to have several transition areas along its length. These may be walls, parapets, columns or other obstructions. As such, the expansion joint product, in some fashion or other, follows the joint. In many products, this is a point of weakness, as the homogeneous nature of the product is interrupted. Methods of handling these transitions include stitching, gluing, and welding. All of these are weak spots from both a water proofing aspect and a fire resistance aspect.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As used herein, the term “waterproof” means that the flow of water is prevented, the term “water resistant” means that the flow of water is inhibited, and the term “fire resistant” means that the spread of fire is inhibited.


In one aspect, the present invention resides in a fire resistant and water resistant expansion joint system comprising a compressed lamination of fire retardant infused open celled foam, one coat of an elastomeric waterproofing or water resistant material on the lamination, and another coat of an intumescent material on an opposing surface of the lamination, thereby providing fire resistance in one direction and water resistance in the opposite direction. The intumescent material may be further coated with a similar elastomeric material, thereby providing fire resistance in one direction and water resistance in both directions. In the alternative, the compressed lamination may comprise first and second opposing layers of intumescent material thereon each having a respective layer of elastomeric material to provide both water resistance and fire resistance in both directions. The systems as described herein are not limited to any particular type of foam, however, as various types of foams (including polyurethanes) are within the scope of the present invention.


In another aspect, the present invention resides in an architectural joint system comprising first and second substrates arranged to be coplanar and an expansion joint located in compression therebetween. The expansion joint is an open celled polyurethane foam having a fire retardant material infused therein. At least one layer of an intumescent material is disposed on at least one surface of the open celled polyurethane foam, and at least one layer of elastomer is disposed on at least one of a surface of the open celled polyurethane foam and at least one layer of the intumescent material. Upon compression of the expansion joint and its location between the substrates, the expansion joint accommodates movement between the substrates while imparting fire resistance and water resistance.


In another aspect, the present invention resides in a method of installing an expansion joint. In the method of installing such a joint, first and second substrates are provided in a coplanar arrangement such that a gap is formed between the edges thereof. An expansion joint system comprising a foam infused with a fire retardant material and having a water resistant layer and a fire resistant layer disposed thereon is compressed and inserted into the gap between the substrates and allowed to expand to fill the gap.


In the embodiments of the systems described herein, the elastomer material provides for waterproofing or water resistance, the intumescent material provides for fire resistance, and the fire retardant infused open celled foam provides for both fire resistance and movement properties. These materials can be assembled and arranged so as to offer waterproofing or water resistance in one direction and fire resistance in the other (an asymmetrical configuration), or in a fashion that offers both waterproofing (or water resistance) and fire resistance in both directions (a symmetrical configuration) through the building joint. The system is delivered to the job site in a pre-compressed state ready for installation into the building joint.


The expansion joint systems and architectural joint systems of the present invention provide a substantially resilient fire resistant and water resistant mechanism that is able to accommodate thermal, seismic, and other building movements while maintaining both fire and water resistance characteristics.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of an expansion joint system of the present invention.



FIG. 1A is a detail view of FIG. 1 illustrating foam 12 infused with a fire retardant material 60.



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of another embodiment of an expansion joint system of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of another embodiment of an expansion joint system of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The expansion joint system described is best understood by referring to the attached drawings. The expansion joint system as described herein is shown as being installed between concrete substrates. The present invention is not limited in this regard, however, as the expansion joint system may be installed between substrates or surfaces other than concrete. Materials for such substrates or surfaces include, but are not limited to, glass, asphalt, stone (granite, marble, etc.), metal, and the like.


Referring to FIG. 1, one embodiment of an expansion joint system is shown at 10 and is hereinafter referred to as “system 10.” In system 10, compressed laminations 13 of open celled polyurethane foam 12 (hereinafter referred to as “foam 12”) are infused with a fire retardant material 60 (as illustrated in Detail FIG. 1A) to form the defined expansion joint locatable between coplanar concrete substrates 50. As stated above, the present invention is not limited to the use of polyurethane foams, as other foams are within the scope of the present invention. The individual laminations 13A extend substantially perpendicular to the direction in which the joint extends and are constructed by infusing each lamination with an amount of fire retardant material 60. However, the structures of the present invention are also not limited in this regard, as the foam may comprise a solid block of non-laminated foam of fixed size depending upon the desired joint size, a laminate comprising laminations oriented parallel to the direction in which the joint extends, or combinations of the foregoing. The amount of fire retardant material 60 infused into the open celled foam is between 3.5:1 and 4:1 by weight in ratio with the un-infused foam itself. The resultant uncompressed foam, whether comprising a solid block or laminates, has a density of about 130 kg/m3 to about 150 kg/m3 and preferably about 140 kg/m3.


One type of fire retardant material 60 that may be used is water-based aluminum tri-hydrate (also known as aluminum tri-hydroxide (ATH)). The present invention is not limited in this regard, however, as other fire retardant materials may be used. Such materials include, but are not limited to, metal oxides and other metal hydroxides, aluminum oxides, antimony oxides and hydroxides, iron compounds such as ferrocene, molybdenum trioxide, nitrogen-based compounds, combinations of the foregoing materials, and other compounds capable of suppressing combustion and smoke formation.


Several laminations of the polyurethane foam, the number depending on the desired size of the expansion joint, are compiled and then compressed and held at such compression in a suitable fixture. The fixture is at a width slightly greater than that which the expansion joint is anticipated to experience at the largest possible movement of the adjacent concrete surfaces. At this width, the infused foam laminate is coated with a waterproof elastomer 14 at one surface. This waterproof elastomer may be a polysulfide, silicone, acrylic, polyurethane, poly-epoxide, silyl-terminated polyether, a formulation of one or more of the foregoing materials with or without other elastomeric components or similar suitable elastomeric coating or liquid sealant materials, or a mixture, blend, or other formulation of one or more of the foregoing. One preferred elastomer coating for application to a horizontal deck where vehicular traffic is expected is Pecora 301, which is a silicone pavement sealant available from Pecora Corporation of Harleysville, Pa. Another preferred elastomeric coating is Dow Corning 888, which is a silicone joint sealant available from Dow Corning Corporation of Midland, Mich. Both of the foregoing elastomers are traffic grade rated sealants. For vertically-oriented expansion joints, exemplary preferred elastomer coatings include Pecora 890, Dow Corning 790, and Dow Corning 795.


Depending on the nature of the adhesive characteristics of the elastomer 14, a primer may be applied to the outer surfaces of the laminations of foam 12 prior to the coating with the elastomer. Applying such a primer may facilitate the adhesion of the elastomer 14 to the foam 12.


The elastomer 14 is tooled or otherwise configured to create a “bellows,” “bullet,” or other suitable profile such that the elastomeric material can be compressed in a uniform and aesthetic fashion while being maintained in a virtually tensionless environment.


The surface of the infused foam laminate opposite the surface coated with the waterproofing elastomer 14 is coated with an intumescent material 16. One type of intumescent material 16 may be a caulk having fire barrier properties. A caulk is generally a silicone, polyurethane, polysulfide, sylil-terminated-polyether, or polyurethane and acrylic sealing agent in latex or elastomeric base. Fire barrier properties are generally imparted to a caulk via the incorporation of one or more fire retardant agents. One preferred intumescent material 16 is 3M CP25WB+, which is a fire barrier caulk available from 3M of St. Paul, Minn. Like the elastomer 14, the intumescent material 16 is tooled or otherwise configured to create a “bellows” profile to facilitate the compression of the foam lamination.


After tooling or otherwise configuring to have the bellows-type of profile, both the coating of the elastomer 14 and the intumescent material 16 are cured in place on the foam 12 while the infused foam lamination is held at the prescribed compressed width. After the elastomer 14 and the intumescent material 16 have been cured, the entire foam composite is removed from the fixture, optionally compressed to less than the nominal size of the material and packaged for shipment to the job site. This first embodiment is suited to horizontal parking deck applications where waterproofing is desired on the top side and fire resistance is desired from beneath, as in the event of a vehicle fire on the parking deck below.


In this system 10, a sealant band and/or corner bead 18 of the elastomer 14 can be applied on the side(s) of the interface between the foam laminate and the concrete substrate 50 to create a water tight seal.


Referring now to FIG. 2, an alternate expansion joint system 20 of the present invention illustrates the foam 12 having a first elastomer 14 coated on one surface and the intumescent material 16 coated on an opposing surface. A second elastomer 15 is coated on the intumescent material 16 and serves the function of waterproofing. In this manner, the system 20 is water resistant in both directions and fire resistant in one direction. The system 20 is used in applications that are similar to the applications in which the system 10 is used, but may be used where water is present on the underside of the expansion joint. Additionally, it would be suitable for vertical expansion joints where waterproofing or water resistance is desirable in both directions while fire resistance is desired in only one direction. The second elastomer 15 may also serve to aesthetically integrate the system 20 with surrounding substrate material.


Sealant bands and/or corner beads 22 of the first elastomer 14 can be applied to the sides as with the embodiment described above. Sealant bands and/or corner beads 24 can be applied on top of the second elastomer 15, thereby creating a water tight seal between the concrete substrate 50 and the intumescent material.


Referring now to FIG. 3, another expansion joint system of the present invention is shown at 30. In system 30, the foam 12 is similar to or the same as the above-described foam, but both exposed surfaces are coated first with the intumescent material 16 to define a first coating of the intumescent material and a second coating of the intumescent material 16. The first coating of the intumescent material 16 is coated with a first elastomer material 32, and the second coating of the intumescent material 16 is coated with a second elastomer material 34. This system 30 can be used in the same environments as the above-described systems with the added benefit that it is both waterproof or at least water resistant and fire resistant in both directions through the joint. This makes it especially suitable for vertical joints in either interior or exterior applications.


In system 30, sealant bands and/or corner beads 38 of the elastomer are applied in a similar fashion as described above and on both sides of the foam 12. This creates a water tight elastomer layer on both sides of the foam 12.


In each of the embodiments described herein, the infused foam laminate is constructed in a manner which insures that substantially the same density of fire retardant 60 is present in the product regardless of the final size of the product. The starting density of the infused foam is approximately 140 kg/m3. After compression, the infused foam density is in the range of 200-700 kg/m3. After installation the laminate will cycle between densities of approximately 750 kg/m3 at the smallest size of the expansion joint to approximately 400-450 kg/m3 (or less) at the maximum size of the joint. This density of 400-450 kg/m3 was determined through experimentation, as a reasonable minimum which still affords adequate fire retardant capacity, such that the resultant composite can pass the UL 2079 test program. The present invention is not limited to cycling in the foregoing ranges, however, and the foam may attain densities outside of the herein-described ranges.


In horizontal expansion joint systems, installation is accomplished by adhering the foam laminate to the concrete substrate using an adhesive such as epoxy. The epoxy or other adhesive is applied to the faces of the expansion joint prior to removing the foam laminate from the packaging thereof (such packaging may comprise restraining elements, straps, ties, bands, shrink wrap plastic, or the like). Once the packaging has been removed, the foam laminate will begin to expand, and it should be inserted into the joint in the desired orientation further to the application of epoxy or other adhesive materials to the side(s) of the foam laminate if so desired. Once the foam lamination has expanded to suit the expansion joint, it will become locked in by the combination of the foam back pressure and the adhesive.


In vertical expansion joint systems, an adhesive band may be pre-applied to the foam lamination. In this case, for installation, the foam laminate is removed from the packaging and simply inserted into the space between the concrete surfaces to be joined where it is allowed to expand to meet the concrete substrate. Once this is done, the adhesive band in combination with the back pressure of the foam will hold the foam in position.


To fill an entire expansion joint, the installation as described above is repeated as needed. To join the end of one foam laminate to the end of another in either the horizontal configuration or the vertical configuration, a technique similar to that used with the sealant band and/or corner beads can be employed. After inserting one section of a system (joint) and adhering it securely to the concrete substrate, the next section is readied by placing it in proximity to the first section. A band or bead of the intumescent material and the elastomer material is applied on the end of the foam laminate in the appropriate locations. The next section is removed from the packaging and allowed to expand in close proximity to the previously installed section. When the expansion has taken place and the section is beginning to adhere to the substrates (joint faces), the section is firmly seated against the previously installed section. The outside faces are then tooled to create an aesthetically pleasing seamless interface.


The above mentioned installation procedure is simple, rapid, and has no invasive elements which impinge upon or penetrate the concrete (or other) substrates. This avoids many of the long term problems associated with invasive anchoring of screws into expansion joint faces.


Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to the detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed in the above detailed description, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method of installing an expansion joint, comprising: locating a first substrate;locating a second substrate arranged to be at least substantially coplanar with the first substrate and being spaced therefrom by a gap;providing a compressed expansion joint system comprising a foam infused with a fire retardant material;inserting the compressed expansion joint system into the gap between the first substrate and the second substrate; andallowing the compressed expansion joint system to decompress to fill the gap between the first substrate and the second substrate, wherein the expansion joint system is capable of withstanding exposure to a temperature of about 540° C. or greater for about five minutes.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the foam has a density when compressed in a range of about 200 kg/m3 to about 700 kg/m3.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the foam has an infused foam density when compressed in a range of about 400 kg/m3 to about 450 kg/m3.
  • 4. An expansion joint system, comprising: foam;a fire retardant material infused into the foam; andwherein the expansion joint system is configured to define a profile to facilitate compression of the system when installed between substrates, and the system is capable of withstanding exposure to a temperature of about 540° C. or greater for about five minutes.
  • 5. The expansion joint system of claim 1, wherein the foam has a density when compressed in a range of about 200 kg/m3 to about 700 kg/m3.
  • 6. The expansion joint system of claim 1, wherein the foam uncompressed has a density of about 130 kg/m3 to about 150 kg/m3.
  • 7. The expansion joint system of claim 1, wherein the foam has an infused foam density when compressed in a range of about 400 kg/m3 to about 450 kg/m3.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/721,855, filed on Dec. 20, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,739,495, issued on Jun. 3, 2014), which is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/622,574, filed on Nov. 20, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,365,495, issued on Feb. 5, 2013), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/116,453, filed on Nov. 20, 2008, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and the benefits of each are fully claimed herein.

US Referenced Citations (282)
Number Name Date Kind
517701 Knower Apr 1894 A
1357713 Lane Nov 1920 A
1428881 Dyar Sep 1922 A
1691402 Oden Nov 1928 A
1716994 Wehrle Jun 1929 A
1809613 Walker Jun 1931 A
2010569 Sitzler Aug 1935 A
2190532 Lukomski Feb 1940 A
2271180 Brugger Jan 1942 A
2277286 Bechtner Mar 1942 A
2701155 Estel, Jr. Feb 1955 A
2776865 Anderson Jan 1957 A
2828235 Holland et al. Mar 1958 A
2954592 Parsons Oct 1960 A
3024504 Miller Mar 1962 A
3111069 Farbish Nov 1963 A
3124047 Graham Mar 1964 A
3172237 Bradley Mar 1965 A
3244130 Hipple, Jr. Apr 1966 A
3289374 Metz Dec 1966 A
3298653 Omholt Jan 1967 A
3300913 Patry et al. Jan 1967 A
3302690 Hurd Feb 1967 A
3344011 Goozner Sep 1967 A
3355846 Tillson Dec 1967 A
3363383 Barge Jan 1968 A
3371456 Balzer et al. Mar 1968 A
3378958 Parks et al. Apr 1968 A
3394639 Viehmann Jul 1968 A
3435574 Hallock Apr 1969 A
3447430 Gausepohl Jun 1969 A
3470662 Kellman Oct 1969 A
3482492 Bowman Dec 1969 A
3543459 Mills Dec 1970 A
3551009 Cammuso et al. Dec 1970 A
3575372 Emberson Apr 1971 A
3582095 Bogaert et al. Jun 1971 A
3603048 Hadfield Sep 1971 A
3629986 Klittich Dec 1971 A
3659390 Balzer et al. May 1972 A
3672707 Russo et al. Jun 1972 A
3694976 Warshaw Oct 1972 A
3720142 Pare Mar 1973 A
3736713 Flachbarth et al. Jun 1973 A
3742669 Mansfeld Jul 1973 A
3750359 Balzer et al. Aug 1973 A
3849958 Balzer et al. Nov 1974 A
3880539 Brown Apr 1975 A
3896511 Cuschera Jul 1975 A
3911635 Traupe Oct 1975 A
3934905 Lockard Jan 1976 A
3944704 Dirks Mar 1976 A
3951562 Fyfe Apr 1976 A
3974609 Attaway Aug 1976 A
4007994 Brown Feb 1977 A
4022538 Watson et al. May 1977 A
4055925 Wasserman et al. Nov 1977 A
4129967 Barlow Dec 1978 A
4140419 Puccio Feb 1979 A
4146939 Izzi Apr 1979 A
4204856 Yigdall et al. May 1980 A
4221502 Tanikawa Sep 1980 A
4245925 Pyle Jan 1981 A
4246313 Stengle, Jr. Jan 1981 A
4258606 Wilson Mar 1981 A
4270318 Carroll et al. Jun 1981 A
4271650 Lynn-Jones Jun 1981 A
4290249 Mass Sep 1981 A
4290713 Brown et al. Sep 1981 A
4295311 Dahlberg Oct 1981 A
4305680 Rauchfuss, Jr. Dec 1981 A
4359847 Schukolinski Nov 1982 A
4367976 Bowman Jan 1983 A
4374442 Hein et al. Feb 1983 A
4401716 Tschudin-Mahrer Aug 1983 A
4424956 Grant et al. Jan 1984 A
4431691 Greenlee Feb 1984 A
4432465 Wuertz Feb 1984 A
4433732 Licht et al. Feb 1984 A
4447172 Galbreath May 1984 A
4455396 Al-Tabaqchall et al. Jun 1984 A
4473015 Hounsel Sep 1984 A
4486994 Fisher et al. Dec 1984 A
4494762 Geipel Jan 1985 A
4533278 Corsover et al. Aug 1985 A
4558875 Yamaji et al. Dec 1985 A
4566242 Dunsworth Jan 1986 A
4576841 Lingemann Mar 1986 A
4589242 Moulinie et al. May 1986 A
4615411 Breitscheidel et al. Oct 1986 A
4620330 Izzi, Sr. Nov 1986 A
4620407 Schmid Nov 1986 A
4622251 Gibb Nov 1986 A
4693652 Sweeney Sep 1987 A
4717050 Wright Jan 1988 A
4745711 Box May 1988 A
4751024 Shu et al. Jun 1988 A
4756945 Gibb Jul 1988 A
4773791 Hartkorn Sep 1988 A
4780571 Huang Oct 1988 A
4781003 Rizza Nov 1988 A
4791773 Taylor Dec 1988 A
4807843 Courtois et al. Feb 1989 A
4824283 Belangie Apr 1989 A
4835130 Box May 1989 A
4839223 Tschudin-Mahrer Jun 1989 A
4848044 LaRoche et al. Jul 1989 A
4866898 LaRoche et al. Sep 1989 A
4879771 Piskula Nov 1989 A
4885885 Gottschling Dec 1989 A
4901488 Murota et al. Feb 1990 A
4920725 Gore May 1990 A
4927291 Belangie May 1990 A
4932183 Coulston Jun 1990 A
4942710 Rumsey Jul 1990 A
4952615 Welna Aug 1990 A
4957798 Bogdany Sep 1990 A
4965976 Riddle et al. Oct 1990 A
4977018 Irrgeher et al. Dec 1990 A
5007765 Dietlein et al. Apr 1991 A
5013377 Lafond May 1991 A
5026609 Jacob et al. Jun 1991 A
5035097 Cornwall Jul 1991 A
5060439 Clements et al. Oct 1991 A
5071282 Brown Dec 1991 A
5072557 Naka et al. Dec 1991 A
5082394 George Jan 1992 A
5120584 Ohlenforst et al. Jun 1992 A
5121579 Hamar et al. Jun 1992 A
5130176 Baerveldt Jul 1992 A
5137937 Huggard et al. Aug 1992 A
5168683 Sansom et al. Dec 1992 A
5190395 Cathey et al. Mar 1993 A
5209034 Box et al. May 1993 A
5213441 Baerveldt May 1993 A
5222339 Hendrickson et al. Jun 1993 A
5270091 Krysiak et al. Dec 1993 A
5297372 Nicholas Mar 1994 A
5327693 Schmid Jul 1994 A
5354072 Nicholson Oct 1994 A
5365713 Nicholas et al. Nov 1994 A
5367850 Nicholas Nov 1994 A
5380116 Colonias Jan 1995 A
5436040 Lafond Jul 1995 A
5441779 Lafond Aug 1995 A
5443871 Lafond Aug 1995 A
5450806 Jean Sep 1995 A
5456050 Ward Oct 1995 A
5472558 Lafond Dec 1995 A
5479745 Kawai et al. Jan 1996 A
5485710 Lafond Jan 1996 A
5489164 Tusch et al. Feb 1996 A
5491953 Lafond Feb 1996 A
5498451 Lafond Mar 1996 A
5501045 Wexler Mar 1996 A
5508321 Brebner Apr 1996 A
5528867 Thompson Jun 1996 A
RE35291 Lafond Jul 1996 E
5607253 Almstrom Mar 1997 A
5611181 Shreiner et al. Mar 1997 A
5616415 Lafond Apr 1997 A
5635019 Lafond Jun 1997 A
5649784 Ricaud et al. Jul 1997 A
5650029 Lafond Jul 1997 A
5656358 Lafond Aug 1997 A
5658645 Lafond Aug 1997 A
5664906 Baker et al. Sep 1997 A
5691045 Lafond Nov 1997 A
5759665 Lafond Jun 1998 A
5762738 Lafond Jun 1998 A
5765332 Landin et al. Jun 1998 A
5773135 Lafond Jun 1998 A
5806272 Lafond Sep 1998 A
5813191 Gallagher Sep 1998 A
5830319 Landin Nov 1998 A
5851609 Baratuci et al. Dec 1998 A
5875598 Batten et al. Mar 1999 A
5876554 Lafond Mar 1999 A
5878448 Molter Mar 1999 A
5888341 Lafond Mar 1999 A
5935695 Baerveldt Aug 1999 A
5957619 Kinoshita et al. Sep 1999 A
5974750 Landin et al. Nov 1999 A
5975181 Lafond Nov 1999 A
6001453 Lafond Dec 1999 A
6035602 Lafond Mar 2000 A
6039503 Cathey Mar 2000 A
D422884 Lafond Apr 2000 S
6088972 Johanneck Jul 2000 A
6115980 Knak et al. Sep 2000 A
6115989 Boone et al. Sep 2000 A
6128874 Olson et al. Oct 2000 A
6131352 Barnes et al. Oct 2000 A
6131364 Peterson Oct 2000 A
6131368 Tramposch et al. Oct 2000 A
6148890 Lafond Nov 2000 A
6189573 Ziehm Feb 2001 B1
6192652 Goer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6207085 Ackerman Mar 2001 B1
6207089 Chuang Mar 2001 B1
6250358 Lafond Jun 2001 B1
6253514 Jobe et al. Jul 2001 B1
6329030 Lafond Dec 2001 B1
6350373 Sondrup Feb 2002 B1
6351923 Peterson Mar 2002 B1
6355328 Baratuci et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368670 Frost et al. Apr 2002 B1
6419237 More Jul 2002 B1
6439817 Reed Aug 2002 B1
6443495 Harmeling Sep 2002 B1
6491468 Hagen Dec 2002 B1
6532708 Baerveldt Mar 2003 B1
6574930 Kiser Jun 2003 B2
6581341 Baratuci et al. Jun 2003 B1
6665995 Deane Dec 2003 B2
6666618 Anaya et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685196 Baerveldt Feb 2004 B1
6820382 Chambers et al. Nov 2004 B1
6860074 Stanchfield Mar 2005 B2
6862863 McCorkle et al. Mar 2005 B2
6877292 Baratuci et al. Apr 2005 B2
6897169 Matsui et al. May 2005 B2
6905650 McIntosh et al. Jun 2005 B2
6989188 Brunnhofer et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996944 Shaw Feb 2006 B2
7043880 Morgan et al. May 2006 B2
7070653 Frost et al. Jul 2006 B2
7090224 Iguchi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7210557 Phillips et al. May 2007 B2
7222460 Francies, III et al. May 2007 B2
7225824 West et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240905 Stahl, Sr. Jul 2007 B1
7278450 Condon Oct 2007 B1
7287738 Pitlor Oct 2007 B2
7441375 Lang Oct 2008 B2
7665272 Reen Feb 2010 B2
7678453 Ohnstad et al. Mar 2010 B2
7836659 Barnes Nov 2010 B1
7856781 Hilburn, Jr. Dec 2010 B2
7877958 Baratuci et al. Feb 2011 B2
8033073 Binder Oct 2011 B1
8079190 Hilburn, Jr. Dec 2011 B2
8172938 Alright et al. May 2012 B2
8341908 Hensley et al. Jan 2013 B1
8365495 Witherspoon Feb 2013 B1
8601760 Hilburn, Jr. Dec 2013 B2
8739495 Witherspoon Jun 2014 B1
20020088192 Calixto Jul 2002 A1
20020095908 Kiser Jul 2002 A1
20020113143 Frost et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020193552 Kiuchi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030110723 Baerveldt Jun 2003 A1
20030213211 Morgan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040020162 Baratuci et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040045234 Morgan et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040101672 Anton et al. May 2004 A1
20040113390 Broussard, III Jun 2004 A1
20050066600 Moulton et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050120660 Kim et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050155305 Cosenza et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050193660 Mead Sep 2005 A1
20050222285 Massengill et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060010817 Shull Jan 2006 A1
20060030227 Hairston et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070137135 Shymkowich Jun 2007 A1
20070199267 Moor Aug 2007 A1
20070261342 Cummings Nov 2007 A1
20080019373 Filipovich et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080172967 Hilburn Jul 2008 A1
20080193738 Hensley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090036561 Nygren Feb 2009 A1
20090223150 Baratuci et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100058696 Mills Mar 2010 A1
20100281807 Bradford Nov 2010 A1
20100319287 Shaw Dec 2010 A1
20110016808 Hulburn, Jr. Jan 2011 A1
20110083383 Hilburn, Jr. Apr 2011 A1
20110088342 Stahl, Sr. et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110135387 Derrigan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110247281 Pilz et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120117900 Shaw May 2012 A1
20140151968 Hensley et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1259351 Sep 1989 CA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Lester Hensley, “Where's the Beef in Joint Sealants? Hybrids Hold the Key,” Applicator, vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 2001, pp. 1-5.
Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd, Seismic Colorseal, Tech Data, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite VP Premium Quality Pre-compressed Joint Sealant for Weather tight, Vapor Permeable, Vertical Applications, Technical Data, dated Oct. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Seismic Sealtite II, Colorized, Pre-compressed Joint Sealant for Vertical Applications, Technical Data, dated Sep. 20, 2006, pp. 1-2.
Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd, Horizontal Colorseal, Tech Data, Nov. 2008, pp. 1-2.
Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd, Seismic Colorseal, Tech Data, Jul. 2009, pp. 1-2.
Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd, Horizontal Colorseal, Tech Data, Jul. 2009, pp. 1-2.
Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd, Horizontal Colorseal, Tech Data, Jun. 2010, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite “B”, Pre-compressed Joint Sealant, Premium Quality for Secondary Sealant Applications, Technical Data, dated Oct. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2.
ISO-Chemie GmbH, Order Confirmation Sheet, dated Apr. 26, 2007, pp. 1-3.
ISO-Flame Kombi F 120, Net Price List, Schul International Co., dated Jun. 27, 2006, pp. 1.
Tremco Illbruck Limited, Compriband Super FR, Fire Rated Acrylic Impregnated Foam Sealant Strip, Issue 3, dated Apr. 12, 2007, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite, Premium Quality Pre-compressed Joint Sealant for Waterproof Vertical Applications, not dated, pp. 1.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite 50N, Premium Quality Pre-compressed Joint Sealant for Horizontal Applications, dated Oct. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite “B”, Pre-compressed Joint Sealant, Premium Quality for Secondary Sealant Applications, dated Oct. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2.
Schul International Co., LLC, Sealtite VP, Premium Quality Pre-compressed Joint Sealant for Weather tight, Vapor Permeable, Vertical Applications, dated Oct. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2.
Illbruck/USA, Will-Seal 150 Impregnanted Precompressed Expanding Foam Sealant Tape, Spec-Data Sheet, Joint Sealers, dated Nov. 1987, pp. 1-2.
Illbruck, Inc., Will-Seal 250 Impregnanted Precompressed Expanding Foam Sealant Tape, Spec-Data Sheet, Joint Sealers, dated Aug. 1989, pp. 1-2.
U.S. Department of Labor, Material Safety Data Sheet, Identity: Wilseal 150/250 and/or E.P.S., date prepared Jul. 21, 1986, pp. 1-2.
Illbruck, TechSpec Division Facade & Roofing Solutions, ALFAS compriband, Mar. 2005, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/032212, dated Aug. 25, 2014.
Grace Fireproofing Products. Monokote Z-146T. 2007.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61116453 Nov 2008 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13721855 Dec 2012 US
Child 14278210 US
Parent 12622574 Nov 2009 US
Child 13721855 US