This invention relates to a fire control mechanism for a firearm. Firearms may be subject to a drop test, wherein the firearm is cocked and dropped, causing it to impact a supporting surface. If the fire control system operates during the impact and fires a round, the firearm fails the drop test.
There remains a need for fire control assemblies capable of passing a drop test while providing other benefits over a stock trigger.
It is also desirable for a fire control mechanism to feel smooth while the trigger is pulled. Triggers that do not feel smooth are often described as having a gritty pull. As fire control systems improve, there remains a need for novel fire control designs that have improved feel and force characteristics.
All US patents and applications and all other published documents mentioned anywhere in this application are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Without limiting the scope of the invention a brief summary of some of the claimed embodiments of the invention is set forth below. Additional details of the summarized embodiments of the invention and/or additional embodiments of the invention may be found in the Detailed Description of the Invention below.
A brief abstract of the technical disclosure in the specification is provided as well only for the purposes of complying with 37 C.F.R. 1.72. The abstract is not intended to be used for interpreting the scope of the claims.
In some embodiments, a fire control assembly comprises a trigger rotatable about a trigger axis and a hammer rotatable about a hammer axis. A trigger spring is arranged to bias the trigger in a first direction about the trigger axis. A hammer spring is arranged to bias the hammer in a second direction about the hammer axis. The trigger comprises a trigger sear and a stop. The hammer comprises a hammer sear and a catch. The fire control assembly comprises a first orientation wherein the trigger sear contacts the hammer sear and impedes rotation of the hammer, and a second orientation wherein the stop contacts the catch and impedes rotation of the hammer.
In some embodiments, the catch comprises a cavity and the stop comprises a protrusion.
In some embodiments, a sear engagement location and a catch engagement location are located to a common side of a reference plane that intersects the hammer axis and the trigger axis.
In some embodiments, in the first orientation, the hammer sear and the catch are located to a common side of a reference plane that intersects the hammer axis and the trigger axis.
In some embodiments, the hammer comprises a first width portion and a second width portion. The first width portion comprises the hammer sear and the second width portion comprises the catch. In some embodiments, the trigger comprises a first width portion and a second width portion. The first width portion comprises the trigger sear and the second width portion comprises the stop.
In some embodiments, the hammer comprises a first rotational position in the first orientation, a second rotational position in the second orientation and a third rotational position wherein the hammer is configured to strike a firing pin.
In some embodiments, the trigger sear contacts the hammer sear at a sear engagement location. A reference triangle extending between the trigger axis, the hammer axis and the sear engagement location comprises a sear location interior angle greater than 120 degrees.
In some embodiments, a fire control assembly comprises a trigger rotatable about a trigger axis and a hammer rotatable about a hammer axis. The trigger comprises a trigger sear. The hammer comprises a hammer sear. The trigger sear contacts the hammer sear at a sear engagement location. A reference triangle extending between the trigger axis, the hammer axis and the sear engagement location comprising a sear location interior angle greater than 130 degrees.
In some embodiments, a hammer sear radial distance is greater than a trigger sear radial distance. In some embodiments, a hammer sear radial distance is at least 1.5 times a trigger sear radial distance.
In some embodiments, a fire control assembly comprises a trigger rotatable about a trigger axis and a hammer rotatable about a hammer axis. The trigger comprises a trigger sear comprising a leading edge. The hammer comprises a hammer sear. A travel path of the leading edge does not overlap with hammer structure adjacent to the hammer sear.
These and other embodiments which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages and objectives obtained by its use, reference can be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof and the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there are illustrated and described various embodiments of the invention.
A detailed description of the invention is hereafter described with specific reference being made to the drawings.
While this invention may be embodied in many different forms, there are described in detail herein specific embodiments of the invention. This description is an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiments illustrated.
For the purposes of this disclosure, like reference numerals in the figures shall refer to like features unless otherwise indicated.
In some embodiments, the fire control assembly 10 comprises a hammer 20 arranged to pivot about a hammer axis 22 and a trigger 30 arranged to pivot about a trigger axis 32. In some embodiments, the hammer 20 is supported by a hammer pin 24 that is supported by the housing 8, and the trigger 30 is supported by a trigger pin 34 that is supported by the housing 8. In some embodiments, a hammer spring 28 is arranged to bias the hammer 20 in a predetermined rotational direction. In some embodiments, a trigger spring 36 is arranged to bias the trigger 30 in a predetermined rotational direction.
Under certain conditions, for example during a drop test, it may be possible for the sears 27, 37 to disengage and allow the hammer 20 to fall even in the absence of any user applied force 56 operating the trigger 30.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the trigger 30 comprises a stop 70. In some embodiments, the stop 70 comprises a protrusion. In some embodiments, under certain conditions, the stop 70 is arranged to engage the catch 64 and stop rotational movement of the hammer 20. In some embodiments, the stop 70 contacts the contacting surface 66 of the catch 64.
In some embodiments, the hammer 20 comprises a first width portion 68 and a second width portion 69. In some embodiments, the first width portion 68 comprises the hammer sear 27. In some embodiments, the second width portion 69 comprises the catch 64.
In some embodiments, the trigger 30 comprises a first width portion 78 and a second width portion 79. In some embodiments, the first width portion 78 comprises the trigger sear 37. In some embodiments, the second width portion 79 comprises the stop 70.
In some embodiments, a distance between the trigger axis 32 and the trigger sear 37 is less than a distance between the trigger axis 32 and the stop 70.
In some embodiments, the catch 64 is configured to be released by operation of the trigger 30, for example by a user applied force 56. In some embodiments, disengagement of the catch 64 by operation of the trigger 30 requires a greater amount of user applied force 56 than disengagement of the sears 27, 37 by operation of the trigger 30. In some embodiments, the amount of force 56 required to disengage the catch 64 and stop 70 can be adjusted by adjusting the angle(s) of surfaces of the catch 64 and/or the stop 70. For example, in some embodiments, the contacting surface 66 of the catch 64 and a surface of the stop 70 can behave similar to a set of sears. In some embodiments, changing an orientation angle of the contacting surface 56 can change the force 56 required to disengage the catch 64. For example, in some embodiments, the contracting surface 66 is arranged parallel to a radial line extending from the hammer axis 22. In such embodiments, frictional engagement between the contacting surface 66 and the stop 70 may determine the force 56 required for disengagement, and the hammer 20 does not rotate as the stop 70 moves to clear the contacting surface 66. In some embodiments, the contacting surface 66, the stop 70, or both, are configured such that the hammer 20 is required to rotate as the stop 70 moves to clear the contacting surface 66. For example, when the contacting surface 66 is configured as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the hammer 20 comprises a strike face 82 arranged to contact a firing pin. In some embodiments, the hammer 20 comprises a disconnector engagement surface 84. In some embodiments, the strike face 82 and the disconnector engagement surface 84 are located to the first side 71 of the reference plane 72.
In some embodiments, a sear engagement location 75 is defined where the hammer sear 27 contacts the trigger sear 37. In some embodiments, the sear engagement location 75 is located to the second side 73 of the reference plane 72.
In some embodiments, a catch engagement location 77 is defined where the catch 64 engages the stop 70. In some embodiments, the catch engagement location 77 is located to the second side 73 of the reference plane 72.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the fire control arrangement disclosed herein is compatible with two-stage triggers. For example, in some embodiments, the trigger sear 37 and hammer sear 27 disclosed herein can comprise the secondary sears of a two-stage trigger. Thus, in some embodiments, a two-stage trigger can comprise a drop-safe catch 64 and the sear geometry configurations described herein.
In some embodiments, the trigger sear 37 comprises a leading edge 33. In some embodiments, the leading edge 33 contacts and slides along the hammer sear 27 as the trigger 30 is pulled. In some embodiments, the leading edge 33 follows a travel path 86 that does not overlap with hammer structure. For example, in some embodiments, the leading edge 33 follows a travel path 86 that does not overlap with hammer structure located adjacent to the hammer sear 27. This arrangement allows the trigger 30 to be pulled and the leading edge 33 to travel along the hammer sear 27 without causing rotation of the hammer 20.
In some embodiments, the specific location of the sear engagement location 75 with respect to the hammer axis 22 and the trigger axis 32 provide geometry that allows the leading edge 33 to move in a way that does not overlap hammer structure.
In some embodiments, a reference triangle can be drawn with angles oriented at the hammer axis 22, the trigger axis 32 and the sear engagement location 75. The reference triangle defines a hammer interior angle 92 near the hammer axis 22, a trigger interior angle 90 near the trigger axis 32 and a sear engagement interior angle 94. In some embodiments, the sear engagement interior angle 94 is 120 degrees or more.
It has been found that combining a relatively large sear engagement interior angle 94 along with a trigger sear radius that is less than the hammer sear radius provides a better trigger feel during operation. Increasing the sear engagement interior angle 94 generally causes a reduction in the hammer interior angle 92 and/or the trigger interior angle 90. Shortening the trigger sear radius tends to improve the trigger feel. This is believed to be due to a reduction in the moment arm distance to the leading edge 33, which reduces torque feedback to the shooter caused by grit on the hammer sear 27 during trigger pull.
In some embodiments, the sear engagement interior angle 94 is 120 degrees or more. In some embodiments, the sear engagement interior angle 94 is 130 degrees or more. In some embodiments, the sear engagement interior angle 94 is 130 degrees or more.
In some embodiments, the trigger sear radius 93 is less than the hammer sear radius 91. In some embodiments, the hammer sear radius 91 is at least 1.1 times the trigger sear radius 93. In some embodiments, the hammer sear radius 91 is at least 1.3 times the trigger sear radius 93. In some embodiments, the hammer sear radius 91 is at least 1.5 times the trigger sear radius 93.
The above disclosure is intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. This description will suggest many variations and alternatives to one of ordinary skill in this field of art. All these alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims where the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.” Those familiar with the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein which equivalents are also intended to be encompassed by the claims.
Further, the particular features presented in the dependent claims can be combined with each other in other manners within the scope of the invention such that the invention should be recognized as also specifically directed to other embodiments having any other possible combination of the features of the dependent claims. For instance, for purposes of claim publication, any dependent claim which follows should be taken as alternatively written in a multiple dependent form from all prior claims which possess all antecedents referenced in such dependent claim if such multiple dependent format is an accepted format within the jurisdiction (e.g. each claim depending directly from claim 1 should be alternatively taken as depending from all previous claims). In jurisdictions where multiple dependent claim formats are restricted, the following dependent claims should each be also taken as alternatively written in each singly dependent claim format which creates a dependency from a prior antecedent-possessing claim other than the specific claim listed in such dependent claim below.
This completes the description of the preferred and alternate embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiment described herein which equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto.
This application claims the benefit and is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/153,787, filed Jan. 20, 2021, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/963,526, filed Jan. 20, 2020, and claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/964,079, filed Jan. 21, 2020, the entire content of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
109513 | Hay | Nov 1870 | A |
2457296 | Yawman | Dec 1948 | A |
2920413 | Marhefka et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
3206884 | Purvis | Sep 1965 | A |
3768190 | Ruger et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
4004496 | Snodgrass et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4005540 | Robinson | Feb 1977 | A |
4310981 | Waddell | Jan 1982 | A |
4433610 | Tatro | Feb 1984 | A |
4667429 | Perazzi | May 1987 | A |
4680884 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4691461 | Behlert | Sep 1987 | A |
4955155 | Jones | Sep 1990 | A |
5018292 | West | May 1991 | A |
5463829 | Sprangers | Nov 1995 | A |
5503137 | Fusco | Apr 1996 | A |
5548914 | Anderson | Aug 1996 | A |
5623114 | Soper | Apr 1997 | A |
5822903 | Davis, Sr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5881485 | Milazzo | Mar 1999 | A |
5904132 | Biller | May 1999 | A |
6164001 | Lee | Dec 2000 | A |
6298594 | Strayer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6367465 | Buccieri, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6615527 | Martin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651642 | Powers | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6722072 | Mccormick | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6772072 | Ganguli et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7162824 | Mccormick | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7188561 | Kelbly | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7293385 | Mccormick | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331136 | Geissele et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7600338 | Geissele | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7661220 | Crandall et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7854084 | Rutherford | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7992338 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8893607 | Audibert et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9046313 | Lutton | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9175917 | Bender | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9618289 | Geissele | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9927197 | Geissele | Mar 2018 | B1 |
10006733 | Bender | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20030228915 | Goko | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050229911 | Simo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060101695 | Longueira | May 2006 | A1 |
20060207149 | Lazor | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080010889 | Metzger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090183414 | Geissele | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090266348 | Yeh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100281739 | Geissele | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110167691 | Bowman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167697 | Geissele | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120117841 | Joubert et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130047484 | Wickser, Jr. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130118050 | Alicea | May 2013 | A1 |
20130167423 | Lupher et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130213376 | Kenworthy | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130269233 | Chin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140366418 | Stakes | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160018176 | Fellows et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20180045481 | Williams | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007004588 | Jul 2008 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210239417 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62964079 | Jan 2020 | US | |
62963526 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17153787 | Jan 2021 | US |
Child | 17155003 | US |