1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to fire doors. More particularly, the invention relates to a fire door stop to stop the spread of smoke, hot gases, or fire from flowing between a fire door and the door frame.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) develops codes and standards that minimize the risk and effects of fire and other hazardous situations. NFPA 80 regulates the installation and maintenance of assemblies and devices used to protect openings in walls, floors, and ceilings and as of 2007 requires that all doors and door frames that are labeled fire doors and labeled fire door frames be inspected and tested annually. This standard is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference. NFPA 80 specifies the allowable clearances or gaps between fire door and frame and the floor. Currently, the specified clearance between door and frame is ⅛ inch, plus or minus 1/16 inch, for steel doors, and shall not exceed ⅛ inch for wood doors. The clearance between the bottom of the fire door and the floor shall be a maximum of ¾ inch.
Precise standards regulating fire doors exist to ensure that a fire door assembly, which includes a fire door and a fire door frame with door frame, functions as desired to stop the flow of fire, hot gases, and smoke. The standards require that the fire door assembly, i.e., the labeled door frame and the labeled fire door, be built to a specified size and then be installed, such that about ½ inch of the edge of the door overlaps the soffit height of the frame, which is typically ⅝ inch deep, thereby creating an overlap interface between fire door and door frame. The specified clearance between door and frame is ⅛ inch, plus/minus 1/16 inch for steel doors, and shall not exceed ⅛ inch for wood doors. Clearances are always measured from the pull face of the door. This overlap is necessary in a fire condition to keep the fire door in place and together, when a fire hose water stream is put onto the fire door, and to hold back the fire, hot gases, and smoke, and also to allow for shrinkage in wood doors, as the wood edges burn away in a fire condition.
Unfortunately, the doors and door frames are built to the minimum standards and, if the installation isn't perfect, the clearance between the edge of the labeled fire door and the labeled door frame may be excessive, such that the overlap is less than specified or that a gap exists between the edge of the door and the edge of the frame. There are an estimated 150 million fire doors installed in the US today and 80% of them fail a first-time inspection. The overwhelming majority of the failures are due to excessive clearance between door and door frame. Typically, the excessive clearance is ¼ to 5/16 inch wide, with some clearances as large as ½ inch.
Also, buildings settle over the years, increasing imperfections in the installation and contributing to the formation of an excessive clearance. The remedy is to shim the door frame to eliminate the excessive clearance, or to replace the door and frame altogether. Replacing the door and/or frame is not only costly, but may be nearly impossible. In many commercial building, including hospitals and schools, the fire door frames are embedded in concrete as the building is constructed. Even the less invasive remedy of shimming the door frame can be impossible in this case. If it is possible to shim the door, this means pulling the door from the hinge side toward the lock side, which then frequently creates an excessive clearance on the hinge side.
What is needed, therefore, is a simple, reliable means of eliminating a gap between a labeled fire door and labeled fire door frame, even when both door and frame have been built to minimum standards.
The invention is a fire door stop system for use on steel or wood fire door assemblies. The fire door stop system according to the invention, also referred to as a “profile system,” is installed on door labeled fire door frames of labeled fire door assemblies and increases the overlap between the fire door and the door frame. The profile system according to the invention corrects excessive clearances on fire door assemblies, which would otherwise fail a safety inspection and void the label on the labeled fire door assembly, and brings them into compliance with the fire safety codes.
The door stop according to the invention is a profile strip made of 16 to 20 gauge steel with a strip of intumescent sealant that is applied to the profile. The sealant expands with heat, to seal out gases, air, flame, and/or smoke. The overlap of the door with the frame ensures that the fire door is capable of withstanding the typical hose stream pressure, which presses the door against the door stop.
Wood fire doors have wood edges that burn out within minutes in a fire condition, in some cases, leaving no edge to interface with the door frame. These edges require added fire protection along the horizontal edge and/or the vertical edge of the door when clearances are excessive. The fire door stop system according to the invention includes additional profiles for protecting these edges.
A latch protector may also be provided, for use with steel or wood fire doors, to ensure that the bolt extends far enough into the striker plate to properly engage the latch.
The fire door stop system according to the invention, i.e., the fire door stop and, as needed, the edge protectors, latch protector, and the fire-door extension, guarantees proper performance of the fire door, which is an integral part of a life-safety protection system. The fire door stop system accommodates the typical business practice of manufacturing to minimum standards and imperfections in manufacturing and installation.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. The drawings are not drawn to scale.
The present invention will now be described more fully in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention should not, however, be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, they are provided so that this disclosure will be complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
The intumescent sealer 4 is any suitable sealer, such as the intumescent fire, smoke, and draft gasket commercially available as Zero FS-488 or Loreint product number ES99.
The fire door stop system 10 is applied to areas of excessive clearance that frequently occur between the fire door D and the door frame 1, i.e., between the vertical edge of the fire door D that closes against the door frame 2 and, as needed, between the top of the fire door D and the fire door frame 2 and between the bottom of the fire door D and the finished floor. Normally, with steel fire doors, the fire door stop system 10 as described above is sufficient to ensure that the fire door assembly satisfies the fire safety code.
Wood fire doors need added edge protection, because the wood edges, if not protected, may burn out within minutes in a fire condition, leaving little interface between the fire door and the fire door frame. Steel fire doors do not need this edge protection, because steel doesn't burn out or shrink in a fire condition. For this reason, the door stop system 10 includes a horizontal edge protector 5, a vertical edge protector 9, and a bottom-edge extender 7.
The door stop system 10 according to the invention is constructed to match the rating of the fire door assembly up to three (3) hours and does not increase or decrease the rating of the fire door assembly.
It is understood that the embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present invention. Variations in the construction of the fire door stop system may be contemplated by one skilled in the art without limiting the intended scope of the invention herein disclosed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3130455 | Borlenghi | Apr 1964 | A |
3566541 | Coulter | Mar 1971 | A |
3591985 | Coppins | Jul 1971 | A |
4001974 | Wright | Jan 1977 | A |
4281481 | Wendt | Aug 1981 | A |
4748771 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4888918 | Green et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5203130 | Freelove | Apr 1993 | A |
5214880 | Woodruff et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230180 | Tweedt et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5355625 | Matsuoka | Oct 1994 | A |
5669192 | Opdyke et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5836118 | Thornton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6088966 | Kenkel | Jul 2000 | A |
6170210 | Marts | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6374545 | Baczuk | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6478308 | McMillin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6668499 | Degelsegger | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6826877 | Stradel | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7204059 | Schiffmann et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20040221527 | Sykora | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050268559 | Ellingson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060179905 | Killins | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070261312 | Kuppler | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090241465 | Majors | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110095548 | Weinraub | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110283627 | Shaw | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140260017 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61788542 | Mar 2013 | US |