The present invention relates generally to protection devices for fire protection sprinklers. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a sprinkler guard for protecting a sprinkler in its installed and operative position.
Generally, automatic fire protection sprinklers include a frame for connection to a supply pipe of firefighting fluid and a deflection member coupled to the frame for distribution of the fluid to address a fire. The frame includes a formed body having an internal passageway with a fluid inlet for receipt of the fluid and a fluid outlet defining a discharge orifice from which the fluid is discharged. Externally formed about the sprinkler body proximate the outlet is a boss or enlarged formation for engagement by an installation tool such as a wrench to facilitate sprinkler installation. In an automatic sprinkler, the fluid discharge is automatically controlled by operation of a thermally responsive trigger or actuator that maintains a fluid tight seal at the discharge orifice by, for example, exertion of pressure on a sealing assembly disposed within the outlet. When the temperature surrounding the sprinkler is elevated within a range of the nominal temperature rating of the trigger, the trigger operates thereby permitting ejection and release of the sealing assembly and the discharge of fluid through the discharge orifice. The discharged fluid impacts the fluid deflection member and is distributed in a designed spray pattern and density in order to effectively address a fire and wet the surrounding area. Several factors can influence the water distribution patterns of a sprinkler including, for example, the installation orientation and the geometry of the fluid deflection member, the distance between the deflection member and the discharge orifice, and/or the shape of the sprinkler frame to which the deflection member is coupled. Accordingly, the fluid control, distribution and performance of an automatic sprinkler is dependent upon the integrity of the sprinkler assembly and its individual components.
Automatic sprinklers are installed in a variety of environments which can expose the sprinkler to accidental impact. For example, storage type automatic sprinklers can be installed in a storage warehouse beneath the warehouse ceiling and above the storage area and commodities to be protected. In the storage environment, stored commodities are stacked and moved by operating personnel or material handling equipment such as forklifts. The movement of material or mechanical equipment proximate to an installed automatic sprinkler exposes the sprinkler to possible accidental impact and damage. If the trigger of the sprinkler is damaged, water may discharge from the sprinkler; or if the deflector or frame is damaged, the sprinkler may not distribute fluid in the proper pattern.
It is well known to use a sprinkler guard to protect an installed sprinkler. Generally, the sprinkler guard includes a caged enclosure with one open-ended base. The guard is installed by sliding the guard over the sprinkler through the base so that the sprinkler is coaxially centered within the cage. The guard is affixed to the sprinkler by securing the open-ended base about the sprinkler body against the enlarged boss of the sprinkler body. Sprinkler guards are configured for protecting sprinklers installed in an upright orientation, in which fluid is discharged from the sprinkler body toward the ceiling and then redirected downward by the fluid deflection member toward the protection area or a pendent orientation. Sprinkler guards are also configured for protecting sprinklers installed in a pendent orientation, in which fluid is discharged downward to impact the fluid deflection member for distribution below the sprinkler over the protection area. In the case of suppression type sprinklers such as, for example, Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) fire protection sprinklers, a portion of the spray pattern is directed or thrusted axially downward below the sprinkler toward the area being protected. Illustrative examples of these known sprinkler guards are shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,797,746; 5,632,339; and 5,893,418. Examples of commercially available sprinkler guards are shown and described in technical data publication TFP784: Model EG-25 Sprinkler Guard For Model ESFR-25 Pendent Sprinkler (December 2017) from Tyco Fire Products, LP and technical data publication Form F_012798: Sprinkler Guards (Oct. 11, 2018, Rev. 16.1) from Viking Corp.
Although these caged enclosures can protect a sprinkler, a design concern remains in ensuring that the cage structure itself does not interfere with or inhibit the fluid distribution performance of the sprinkler. This can be of particular concern where the cage structure or portion thereof is in the spray path directly below or proximate the sprinkler fluid deflection member. Accordingly, there remains a need for sprinkler guard structures that provide sufficient protection to a sprinkler while minimizing or eliminating interference with the spray pattern of the sprinkler. In addition, some of these known sprinkler guards present an installation complexity. More specifically, due to the single open end of the guard through which the sprinkler is inserted, there is limited flexibility when installing the guard about the sprinkler. This can be difficult when working around the surrounding pipe. In addition, some of these known guards use a sliding clip or ring to secure the guard about the sprinkler and require a specific installation tool which can add to the complexity in affixing the sprinkler guard to the sprinkler. Other known sprinkler guards, as seen for example in U.S. Pat. No. 1,469,336 use a hinged base at the open end of a wire sprinkler guard to secure the guard to the sprinkler body. Although the hinged base can swing open and closed about the sprinkler body, locating the sprinkler centrally within the guard still requires insertion of the sprinkler through the open end of the wire guard. Accordingly, there remains a need for a sprinkler guard that provides for a simplified and flexible manner of installation.
Preferred devices and methods to protect fire protection sprinklers are provided. Preferred embodiments of a fire protection sprinkler guard include a cylindrical structure with two guard portions in a hinged arrangement. The preferred hinge configuration of the sprinkler guard operates to flexibly receive a fire protection sprinkler. The hinged sprinkler guard defines an open state for receipt of the fire protection sprinkler and a closed state for surrounding and guarding the fire protection sprinkler. One preferred embodiment of the sprinkler guard includes a first guard portion having a first end and a second end axially spaced from one another with a first end plate disposed at the first end and a first grid of wire members affixed to the first end plate. A preferred second guard portion of the preferred sprinkler guard has a first end and a second end axially spaced from one another with a second end plate disposed at the first end of the second guard portion and a second grid of wire members affixed to the second end plate. The preferred sprinkler guard includes a hinged connection between the first guard portion and the second guard portion to pivot the first and second guard portions with respect to one another and define an open state of the sprinkler guard for receipt of the fire protection sprinkler and a closed state of the sprinkler guard to form a cage structure with a central guard axis for surrounding and guarding the fire protection sprinkler.
Preferred embodiments of the sprinkler guard include a latched configuration that operates in combination with the hinge of the guard to form a rigid cage structure to shield and protect the sprinkler from lateral impact. Additionally, preferred embodiments of the guard are configured for pendent-type fire protection sprinklers. The preferred sprinkler guard includes an open end that circumscribes the sprinkler proximate its fluid deflection member leaving the path below the sprinkler unimpeded so as to minimize or eliminate interference with the fluid distribution spray pattern of the protected sprinkler.
A preferred embodiment of a sprinkler guard having a central guard axis includes a first guard portion having a first end, a second end axially spaced from one another and a first end plate disposed at the first end. A second guard portion has a first end, a second end axially spaced from one another and a second end plate disposed at the first end. A preferred plurality of hinged connections between the first and second guard portions are axially aligned with one another, radially spaced from and extending parallel to the central guard axis. The plurality of hinged connections defines an open state of the sprinkler guard for receipt of a fire protection sprinkler and a closed state of the sprinkler guard for surrounding and guarding the fire protection sprinkler. In a closed state of the sprinkler guard, the first ends of the first and second guard portions circumscribe the central guard axis to define a first end of the sprinkler guard with the first and second end plates disposed for cooperatively engaging a body of the fire protection sprinkler. The second ends of the first and second guard portions circumscribe the central guard axis in the closed state of the guard to define a second end of the guard axially spaced from the first end of the guard portions.
Another preferred embodiment of a sprinkler guard includes a first guard portion having a first end, a second end axially spaced from one another and a plurality of eyelets axially aligned with one another between the first and second ends of the first guard portion. The preferred guard also includes a second guard portion having a first end, a second end axially spaced from one another and a plurality of pins axially aligned with one another between the first and second ends of the second guard portion. In the preferred guard a plurality of hinged connections between the first and second guard portions are defined by each of the plurality of eyelets being engaged by one of the plurality of pins. The plurality of hinged connections are preferably axially aligned with one another, radially spaced from and extending parallel to the central guard axis, the plurality of hinged connections defining an open state of the sprinkler guard for receipt of a fire protection sprinkler and a closed state of the sprinkler guard for surrounding and guarding the fire protection sprinkler. In the closed state of the sprinkler guard, the first ends of the first and second guard portions circumscribe the central guard axis to define a first end of the sprinkler guard, and the second ends of the first and second guard portions circumscribing the central guard axis to define a second end of the guard axially spaced from the first end of the guard. Other preferred embodiments of the sprinkler guard include a plurality of latch connections in which another plurality of eyelets is engaged by a plurality of latch pins. The latch connections preferably form a frictional engagement such that the closed state of the sprinkler guard forms a rigid structure.
Preferred methods of protecting a fire protection sprinkler include obtaining or providing a sprinkler guard having a first guard portion and a second guard portion with each guard portion having a first end with an end plate and grid of wire members affixed to the end plate. The preferred methods include pivoting the first and second guard portions with respect to one another between an open state of the sprinkler guard for receipt of the fire protection sprinkler and a closed state of the sprinkler guard for forming a cage structure with a central guard axis for surrounding and guarding the fire protection sprinkler. A preferred method of protecting a fire protection sprinkler includes obtaining a sprinkler guard that includes a first end, a second end and a plurality of hinge connections axially aligned with one another between the first and second ends that operate to define an open state of the sprinkler guard and a closed state of the sprinkler guard. The preferred method also includes providing the sprinkler guard to protect an installed fire protection sprinkler.
Preferred embodiments of the sprinkler guard provide for a simplified and flexible structure for installation about a fire protection sprinkler. Preferred embodiments of the sprinkler guard include a first end and a second end axially spaced from one another along a central guard axis. The preferred guard defines an internal space between the first and second end for housing the fire protection sprinkler; and a hinged connection between the first and second ends for operation along a pivot axis radially spaced and parallel to the central guard axis such that each of the first and second ends of the guard hinge open about the pivot axis to receive the fire protection sprinkler.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and together, with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention. It should be understood that the preferred embodiments are some examples of the invention as provided by the appended claims.
Shown in
In the closed configuration of the sprinkler guard 10 about the sprinkler 100, the first end 12 of the sprinkler guard 10 is preferably configured to engage the sprinkler frame 110 in a manner that centers the sprinkler 100 within the guard 10 and substantially coaxially aligns the sprinkler axis S—S with the guard axis X—X. The second end 14 of the guard 10 is preferably open ended with the second end 14 preferably configured to circumscribe the fluid deflection member 120 of the sprinkler 100 thereby minimizing or eliminating interference with the spray coming off the deflection member 120 upon actuation of the sprinkler 100.
Generally, the hinge connection 16 between the guard portions 10a, 10b are provided by respective interlocking elements of the guard portions 10a, 10b. Shown in
A preferred embodiment of the pin 22 is preferably elongated and oriented to extend along the hinge axis H—H parallel to the guard central axis X—X. In a preferred aspect, each of the pins 22 includes a base 22a that is affixed and more preferably integrally formed with the rest of the second guard portion 10b. Each pin 22 preferably includes a free end 22b opposite the base 22a to engage a corresponding eyelet 20 of the first guard portion 10a. In addition, the pins 22 are preferably oriented with the free end 22b above the base 22a. The eyelets 20 of the first guard portion 10a are preferably formed and oriented such that the geometric opening and center of the eyelets 20 are aligned to circumscribe the hinge axis H—H for coaxial receipt of the elongate pins. The interlocking elements 20, 22 can define alternative configurations provided the interlocking elements can provide a hinge connection as described herein. The pin 22 can include one or more bends, for example as shown in phantom in the hinge connection 16 of
Dimensionally, the preferred pins 22 are preferably narrower than the openings defined by the respective eyelets 20. Moreover, the pins 22 define a preferred axial length between the base 22a and free end 22b that is greater than the axial height or thickness of the eyelets 20. The dimensional differences between the preferred pins 22 and the eyelets 20 and their respective orientations provide for flexibility in assembly and operation of the guard 10. Each of the first and second guard portions 10a, 10b are formed and fabricated from wire and more preferably from cold drawn steel wire. A preferred gauge (A.S.W) of the wire ranges from 7-10 of which the wire diameter can range from 0.125 inch to 0.177 inch. Accordingly, the pins 22 have a preferred diameter that ranges from 0.125 inch to 0.177 inch and the pins 22 are preferably formed to axial length of about ½ inch, preferably ranging from 0.45 inch to 0.5 inch. The wire is preferably looped to form the eyelets 20 with an eyelet width or internal diameter that preferably ranges from 0.15 inch to 0.18 inch with the axial thickness equivalent to that of the wire ranging from 0.125 inch to 0.177 inch. In preferred embodiments of the guard 10, the ratio of external diameter-to-internal diameter ranging from 1.03:1 to 1.5:1. In another preferred aspect, the ratio of pin length-to-eyelet axial thickness ranges from 4:1 to 3:1.
In assembling the preferred sprinkler guard 10, the eyelets 20 slide over the pins 22 in a downward direction under the force of gravity and are vertically restrained by the base 22a. With the pins 22 of the second guard portion 10b being of a diameter that is less than that of the receiving eyelets 20 of the first guard portion 10a, the two guard portions 10a, 10b can freely rotate with respect to one another about the hinge axis H—H with minimal to no binding. This flexibility in the hinge operation can facilitate installation of the guard 10 about an installed sprinkler as described herein.
The preferred wire construction of each of the first and second guard portions 10a, 10b form one half of the cage sprinkler guard 10. In preferred embodiments, each of the first and second guard portions 10a, 10b include a grid of wire members including at least two vertical members 24a, 24b extending parallel to the guard axis X—X and a group of arcuate members 26a, 26b interconnecting the at least two vertical members 24a, 24b. The wire members 24, 26 are preferably affixed to one another by appropriate means including, for example, spot welding. The arcuate members 26 are preferably disposed perpendicular to the adjoining vertical members so that each arcuate member 26 partially circumscribes the sprinkler guard axis X—X and more preferably spans 180 degrees about the guard axis. In each of the first and second guard portions 10a, 10b, the arcuate members 26a, 26b preferably define a common radius of curvature so that in the closed state of the guard 10, the arcuate members 26a, 26b define the preferred cylindrical bounds of the guard 10. In the preferred formation of the hinge connections 16, one or more of the arcuate members 26a of the first guard portion 10a have one end configured with the preferred eyelet 20. In one or more of the arcuate members 26b of the second guard portion 10b, one end is configured with the preferred pin 22 for engagement with an eyelet 20 of the first guard portion 10a to form the preferred hinged connections 16.
With the hinge connections 16 formed, the sprinkler guard 10 can operate between its open and closed states. In a preferred aspect of the guard 10, the first and second guard portions 10a, 10b form a preferred frictional engagement that renders the first guard portion 10a rigidly affixed with respect to the second portion 10b in the closed state of the guard 10. With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The end plates 36a, 36b cooperate with one another to form one or more of a hinged connection 38 or a latch connection 40. In a preferred embodiment, the end plates include a hinged connection 38 axially aligned with the hinge axis H—H and a latch connection 40 that is aligned with the latch connections 18 joining the first guard portion 10a to the second guard portion 10b. Each of the connections 38, 40 can be formed by joining axially aligned through holes formed in the end plates 36a, 36b with an appropriate mechanical fastener such as, for example, a rivet, a threaded fastener or a bolt and nut assembly. The inclusion of a hinge connection 38 and a latch connection 40 adds stability to the overall guard assembly 10. In particular, the hinge connection 38 adds another hinge connection at the first end 12 of the sprinkler guard 10 to stabilize the assembly during opening and closing operation of the guard. Moreover, in forming the preferred hinge connection 38, a portion of the first end plate 36a and a portion of the second end plate 36b overlap one another to form a preferred sliding engagement between the end plates 36a, 36b. In the preferred embodiments shown in
The latch connection 40 reinforces and adds rigidity to the closed state of the sprinkler guard 10. In the preferred embodiment of the guard 10 shown in
Each of the end plates 36a, 36b include surfaces between the hinge connection 38 and the latch connection 40 that define the central opening in the closed state of the sprinkler guard 10 through which the sprinkler protrudes for connection to a fluid supply pipe. In the closed state of the guard 10, the end plate surfaces contact the sprinkler frame to securely support and coaxially center the sprinkler within the guard and prevent its rotation therein. The supporting surfaces of the end plates 36a, 36b can include a combination of linear edges, arcuate edges and planar surfaces that contact complimentary surfaces of the sprinkler frame to form a supporting surface engagement. In the closed state of the sprinkler guard 10, each of the end plates 36a, 36b preferably have central arcuate edges that contact curved surfaces of the sprinkler body. Moreover, each of the end plates 36a, 36b each preferably include planar tabs disposed about the arcuate edge that extend parallel to the guard axis X—X to contact flat surfaces of the sprinkler frame, for example, located at the wrench flat.
The second end 14 of the sprinkler guard 10 is preferably open ended with no guard structure crossing or traversing the circumscribed area of the second end 14. In preferred embodiments of the sprinkler 100, the second end 14 of the guard 10 consists of two cooperating arcuate members 26a, 26b having one hinged connection 16 and a latch connection 18 joining the arcuate members 26a, 26b to one another in the closed state of the guard 10. By providing an open end at the second end 14 of the guard 10, the guard structure avoids or minimizes disruption to the spray pattern from the protected sprinkler.
The sprinkler guard 10 is preferably configured for protection of a pendent-type sprinkler and preferably an installed suppression pendent-type sprinkler. With reference to
To protect an installed pendent sprinkler 100, the guard 10 is placed in an open state by operation of the hinge connections 16 and wrapped about the sprinkler 100. The guard 10 is preferably oriented, as schematically shown in
With the sprinkler 100 enclosed, the preferably cage structure of the guard 10 protects the sprinkler frame 110, the thermally responsive trigger and the fluid deflection member 120 while sufficiently exposing the trigger to the ambient environment to appropriately thermally respond to a fire and/or rise in temperature. The preferably cylindrical guard 10 had an internal diameter D that defines a preferred ratio with respect to the maximum width W of the sprinkler 100 in which the ratio of guard diameter D-to-maximum sprinkler width W (D:W) ranges from 1.4:1 to 1.5:1. The internal space of the guard 10 between the first end 12 and the second end 14 provides sufficient space for housing the operational components of the sprinkler such as, for example, as its thermal trigger to operate and clear the fluid discharge path from the body to the fluid deflection member. In a preferred embodiment, the internal diameter of the closed configuration of the sprinkler guard 10 preferably ranges from 2⅞ inch to 3 inches. The maximum sprinkler width W can be defined by the outer surfaces of the frame arms 104, as illustrated in
In addition, the preferably open second end 14 of the guard 10 defines a preferably unobstructed area axially below the fluid deflection member 120 of the pendent sprinkler 100. With no guard structure in the fluid deflection path of the sprinkler 100, the spray pattern of the sprinkler 100 is unimpeded. Accordingly, for a suppression type pendent sprinkler, in which a component of the fluid spray is thrust axially downward, the preferred open end 14 of the sprinkler guard 10 is desirable. Moreover, to maximize the efficiency of fluid distribution of the protected sprinkler, the guard 10 can be configured so as to locate the fluid deflection member 120 with respect to the wire members forming the guard 10. In a preferred aspect of the guard 10, the engagement with the sprinkler 100 preferably axially locates the fluid deflection member between the axially spaced arcuate members 26. With reference to
Embodiments of the sprinkler guard 10 provide preferred methods of protecting a fire protection sprinkler. For example, a preferred method includes obtaining a sprinkler guard 10, as described herein, in which the guard 10 has a first end, a second end and a plurality of hinge connections axially aligned with one another between the first and second ends that operate to define an open state of the sprinkler guard and a closed state of the sprinkler guard. The preferred method further includes providing the sprinkler guard to protect an installed fire protection sprinkler. Obtaining the preferred sprinkler guard 10 can include manufacturing, fabricating or purchasing the guard 10 and preferably providing the guard 10 can include supplying and/or selling the guard 10.
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 application of International Application No. PCT/US2020/037775, filed Jun. 15, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/862,502 filed Jun. 17, 2019, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/037775 | 6/15/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/257111 | 12/24/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1469336 | Rowley | Oct 1923 | A |
3797746 | Gray et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
5632339 | Fenske et al. | May 1997 | A |
5893418 | Ponte | Apr 1999 | A |
20070256844 | Blasing et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20120267453 | Devaney | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2019090135 | May 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report in International Appln. No. PCT/US2020/037775, dated Aug. 20, 2020, 16 pages. |
The Viking Corporation, Technical Data, Specific Application ESFR Pendent Sprinkler VK514 (K28.0), Form No. F_010715, 19.04.17, Rev 19.3, 5 pages. |
The Viking Corporation, Technical Data, Sprinkler Guards, Form No. F_012798, 18.10.11, Rev 16.1, P65, 3 pages. |
Tyco Fire Products LP, Datasheet, Model EG-25 Sprinkler Guard for Model ESFR-25 Pendent Sprinkler, TFP 784, Dec. 2017, 2 pages. |
Tyco Fire Products LP, Datasheet, Model G2 Sprinkler Guard, Model WS-2 Shield, and Model WSG-2 Sprinkler Guard with Shield Series ELO-231, ELO-231B, and ELO-231FRB Sprinklers, TFP 782, May 2009, 4 pages. |
The Viking Corporation, Technical Data, Sprinkler Water Shields and Guards, Form No. F_061289, 18.03.29, Rev 18.1, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220203395 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62862502 | Jun 2019 | US |