Not Applicable
The present invention relates generally to joining systems and, more particularly, to a uniquely configured fire rated wall structure that may be used in the construction of wall assemblies such as partitioning walls and non-loading bearing curtain walls and which is specifically adapted to meet fire rating provisions found in many building codes.
In building construction, conventional wall fabrication techniques employ the use of upper and lower headers that are disposed in spaced relationship to one another. The upper and lower headers are attached to the ceiling and floor portions of a building structure and are interconnected with a plurality of stud members disposed in spaced, parallel relationship to one another. The stud members are typically connected to the top and bottom headers with mechanical fasteners such as nails, screws and the like. The framing, which is comprised of the upper and lower headers and the stud members, may be of wooden or metallic construction. Panels such as drywall, gypsum board, sheetrock, and the like are then installed on opposing sides of the framing in order to complete the basic wall structure. Unfortunately, traditional wall construction suffers from several drawbacks include the time-consuming nature of such traditional wall construction methods and resultant high costs.
Metallic framing systems typically employ the use of lightweight steel stud members which are generally channel shaped or U-shaped. The stud members are attachable at opposing ends to horizontally oriented top and bottom plate members. The top and bottom plate members are, in turn, secured to the building structure adjacent the ceiling and floor. In this regard, a metallic framing system comprises a series of spaced apart steel stud members engaged to the top and bottom plate members and which includes wall board which is attached to opposing sides of the metallic faming system.
In conventional construction methodology, the frames may be assembled on the ground with the top and bottom plate members being disposed in spaced apart relationship. The stud members are then connected to the top and bottom plates by engaging the ends of the stud with screws or other suitable fasteners. Because the metallic framing system is dependent upon fasteners for interconnecting the stud members to the top and bottom plate members, the framing system is generally structurally weak when the stud members are initially engaged to the top and bottom plate members prior to fastener installation. The framing system does not achieve full strength until the wall board is affixed to the frame and therefore provides insufficient rigidity until fasteners are inserted.
Another method of securing the stud members to the top and bottom plates involve the use of a tab and slot arrangement wherein tabs disposed on extreme ends of the top and bottom plates engage corresponding slots in the stud members. Such engagement is facilitated by manually urging (i.e., with a hammer) the tabs so that they are reoriented at an angular orientation relative to the stud members which thereby locks the stud members against the top and bottom plates. Unfortunately, such method of interconnecting the stud members to the top and bottom plates requires additional material to form the top and bottom plates. Furthermore, the reorienting or bending of the tabs into the locking position requires additional labor and is therefore relatively time consuming. Although the tab and slot method of connecting the stud members to the top and bottom plates is generally effective in securing such members, the amount of time required to bend the tab a total of four times for each stud member represents a significant drawback which detracts from the overall utility of this type of metallic framing system.
Another method of constructing a metallic framing system from stud members and top and bottom plates involves the use of cooperating formations in each of the components. The formations consist of a securing notch formed in the walls of the mating stud member and plates. In order to facilitate the positioning of the stud member, the walls of the plate members include an upturned lip formed at a location where the stud member mates with the top and bottom plate members. Unfortunately, the additional materials required to form such lip increases overall material costs and necessitates the use of a securing clip which further adds to labor and assembly costs. Another drawback associated with such methodology of connection is the low strength of the framing system due to the minimal amount of engagement between the mating components. More specifically, the limited engagement between the mating components minimizes the overall resistance of the framing system to rotation, twisting and separation of the stud member and top and bottom plate members.
Another problem associated with prior art metallic framing systems is a result of irregularities in floor-to-ceiling heights. More particularly, in building construction, poor concrete finishing and/or irregularities in the height of the ceiling structure necessitates the time-consuming task of cutting and fitting individual stud members to fit between the top and bottom plates mounted to the ceiling and floor. Ideally, the spacing between the floor and the ceiling structure is constant such that the stud members may generally be of the same length. However, irregularities in spacing often occur such that the stud members must be custom fit. Furthermore, windows and/or doors installed in many wall structures require that the stud members must be cut and fit on a trial-and-error basis to accommodate the specific window sizes and door sizes.
Although prior art joining method as described above generally result in a functionally-adequate metallic framing system, such prior art joining systems suffer the significant deficiency of being time-consuming and tedious to assemble. Furthermore, the nature of tab and/or slot joining systems limit the engagement of studs to predetermined positions along the upper track. This limiting feature is unacceptable in many applications such as, for example, in dry wall fit-outs which require unrestricted positioning in order to allow tradesman to overcome often encountered but unforeseen measurement discrepancies. Such measurement discrepancies may be the result of rough and inaccurate pouring of concrete walls.
In addition, prior art joining systems suffer another significant deficiency regarding impracticality for applications having varying ceiling-to-floor measurements. In such situations, the studs with joining ends are typically produced in runs (i.e., set quantities) of predetermined lengths such that variations in ceiling height render such studs unusable. Furthermore, in prior art building methods, set-length studs having joining ends are unsuitable for use due to ceiling height variations as was previously noted. Because such studs are custom-fit studs and have no self-joining mechanisms, tradesman endure the tedious and time-consuming task of connecting such individual studs to the top and bottom tracks as is required for structural integrity of the wall and which is also necessary to allow fitting of electrical wiring, etc.
Unfortunately, when fitting wiring, studs can become dislodged from their original positions. In the case of fire rated walls of the prior art, the top track typically incorporates flanges that are longer than standard in order to trap the engaged studs. The studs are intentionally cut short in order to allow for upward expansion of the stud when exposed to heat as well as to allow downward contraction or movement. Unfortunately, such a system does not allow for relative movement between the studs and track. As such, the studs must be left unfastened and are only supported between the track flanges which results in a relatively weak wall structure that must rely heavily upon the wallboard for load-carrying support. Furthermore, the studs are often temporarily connected much like standard wall construction in order to allow for the fitting of electrical wiring and other utilities.
Metallic framing systems of the prior art suffer from an additional drawback associated with fire rating for interior walls. More particularly, many building codes include fire rating provisions wherein interior portions of the building must be capable of containing heat, smoke and flames of a fire. In this regard, the wall structure is preferably constructed in such a manner as to prevent the migration of heat, smoke and flames to an adjacent room or rooms. The migration of smoke, heat and/or flames may compromise the safety of occupants and/or personal property in an adjacent room. Fireproof ratings are defined in terms of duration or time that a wall must be capable of containing the fire and its effects from migrating to an adjacent part of the building. Typical fire ratings may be expressed in terms of time increments such as one hour, two hours, four hours and upward and are typically imposed on certain areas of building structures including wall structures fabricated with metallic framing systems.
One deficiency associated with the fire rating of wall structures fabricated with metallic framing systems is that the metallic structure typically expands under heat in an amount that is disproportionate to the amount that wall board expands under the same heat. The disparity in expansion between the metallic framing system and the wall board covering the framing system can result in the creation of cracks or gaps in the wall structure. Such gaps may occur at the joint between the ceiling and the wall structure or at other location on the wall structure. Gaps may also occur due to fracturing or crumbling of the wall board as the metallic framing stretches the wall board.
The differences in expansion of the metallic framing system and the wall board is the result of differences in coefficient of thermal expansion. More particularly, because metal has a greater coefficient of thermal expansion than wall board, an increase in the temperature of the room causes the metallic framing in the vertical stud members to expand to a greater extent than the expansion of the wall board. A further deficiency associated with conventional wall structures is the rigid or non-adaptive nature of the wall structure to changes in ceiling height as a result of settling of the building foundation and/or building movement such as may be caused by seismic activity or creeping of load-carrying beams over time. The same drawbacks described above associated with relative movement between the framing system and the wall board is present in ceiling movement or building settling.
As can be seen, there exists a need in the art for a wall structure which employs the use of metallic framing and which is specifically configured to provide a desired fire rating despite differences in the mechanical properties (i.e., coefficient of thermal expansion) of the components that make up the wall structure. More specifically, there exists a need in the art for a fire rated wall structure which includes an expansion joint that allows the metallic framing underlying the wall structure to move dynamically in response to heat and/or building movement without compromising the integrity of the wall board which covers the steel frame such that noxious fumes, smoke, flames and/or heat from a fire cannot migrate through voids or cracks created in the wall board. Finally, there exists a need in the art for a fire rated wall structure and, equally importantly, a fire rated wall structure that incorporates a self-fastening mechanism which allows for quick and economical assembly of the wall structure with minimal skill and which can accommodate irregularities in floor and/or ceiling height.
The above-mentioned deficiencies and drawbacks associated with steel framing systems of the prior art are specifically addressed and alleviated by the fire rated wall structure of the present invention. More particularly, the wall structure of the present invention includes an expansion joint which allows for relative vertical movement of the metallic components of the steel framing and the non-metallic panel member that is secured to the steel framing.
In its broadest sense, the wall structure includes a top and bottom track and at least one stud member. The top and bottom tracks are preferably disposed in spaced and parallel relation to one another and may be mounted to a floor and a ceiling of a building. At least one of the stud members is interconnected to the top and bottom tracks. As is well known in the building construction arts, stud members are generally provided in spaced intervals along the top and bottom track in order to provide a means for connecting the panel members such as drywall to the wall structure.
Each of the top and bottom tracks generally has a channel shaped cross section with opposing terminus ends. Furthermore, each one of the top and bottom tracks comprises a planar web defined by a pair of opposing longitudinal edges. A pair of opposing and inwardly directed male protrusions is integrally formed with and extends continuously along respective ones of the longitudinal edges. The male protrusions preferably have a V-shaped cross section. Each of the top and bottom tracks additionally comprises a pair of substantially flat side walls which are preferably integrally formed with and which extend outwardly from a respective one of the male protrusions. The side walls are preferably oriented perpendicularly relative to the web. In addition, the top and bottom tracks are preferably oriented such that the side walls thereof face one another.
The stud member of the wall structure may be adapted to be transversely interconnected to the top and bottom tracks and is generally oriented in perpendicular relationship thereto. Similar to the configuration of the top and bottom tracks, the stud member may also have a channel shape cross-section with an opposing pair of terminus ends. Importantly, the stud member includes a telescopic mechanism comprising a slip extension slideably engaged to a stationary portion. In this regard, the stud member comprises the slip extension and the stationary portion. As was earlier mentioned, the telescopic mechanism is adapted to allow for changes in the length of the stud member. More particularly, the telescopic mechanism allows the stud member to be either lengthened or shortened in order to accommodate changes in spacing occurring between the top and bottom tracks in the installed wall structure. Such changes may occur during differential heating and/or cooling of the metallic structure comprised of the top and bottom tracks and stud member and the non-metallic nature of the panel member, typically comprised of drywall and/or gypsum board and the like.
Each of the slip extension and stationary portion preferably has a channel shaped cross-section with opposing terminus ends. Specific features are incorporated into at least one of the terminus ends of each the slip extension and stationary portion to facilitate engagement with the top and bottom tracks. More specifically, at least one of the terminus ends of the slip extension and stationary portion includes a pair of opposed and inwardly directly female recesses formed in side walls of the slip extension and stationary portions. Each female recess preferably has a V-shaped cross-section formed complementary to the V-shaped cross-section of the male recesses. In this manner, the female recesses are adapted to receive a respective one of the male protrusions formed in the top and bottom tracks. Mechanical fasteners may additionally be installed in order to interconnect terminus ends of the stud member to the top and bottom tracks. Furthermore, the web 18 of the stationary portion 46 may include at least one opening 48 sized and configured to accommodate a utility conduit to provide a means to route electrical wiring, plumbing, and the like through the wall structure 10.
The wall structure may further comprise an elongate top overcap secured in abutting relationship to the top track. The top overcap preferably has a channel shaped cross-section including a substantially flat planar web with planar side walls extending perpendicularly outwardly from the web. A pair of opposing male protrusions are preferably integrally formed in respective ones of the side walls of the top overcap. The male protrusions extend continuously along a length of the side walls and are preferably configured with a V-shaped cross-section. The top overcap is preferably configured such that at least one of the side walls thereof at least partially overlaps the top track side wall and is disposed in spaced relation thereto. Ideally, the top overcap is configured such that the male protrusion is disposed in contacting relationship to an outer surface of the panel member in order to provide sealing engagement therewith. The top overcap is preferably configured as a unitary structure wherein the web, side walls and male protrusions are integrally formed.
Importantly, the stud member is configured to allow for expansion and contraction of the wall structure due to the inclusion of a slot formed in the slip extension. More specifically, the slot is formed in at least one of the side walls of the slip extension and is configured to allow a fastener to extend thereinto such that relative sliding motion between the slip extension and the stationary portion may freely occur. A panel member may be connectively mounted to the bottom track and a stationary portion. Importantly, the panel member is also disposed in non-connective overlapping relationship to the slip extension and to the top track in order to provide relative movement thereof between the panel member and the slip extension and top track.
In this regard, the panel member may be secured to the wall structure through the use of a plurality of fasteners extending into the side walls of the bottom track and stationary portion. At least one of the fasteners extends through the panel member and into the stationary portion side wall and passing through the slot. As was earlier mentioned, the slot formed in the slip extension allows for relative sliding motion between the slip extension and the stud member such that the stud member may be lengthened and shortened to accommodate changes in spacing between the top and bottom tracks. Such spacing changes may occur due to heating caused by a fire and as a result of differences in coefficient of thermal expansion between the metallic components (i.e., comprised of the top and bottom tracks and stud member) and the non-metallic components (i.e., the panel member).
These as well as other features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reference to the drawings wherein:
Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating various aspects of the present invention and not for purposes of limiting the same, shown in the figures is a fire rated wall structure 10 which is specifically adapted to compensate for expansion or retraction in the overall height of the wall structure 10 such as may occur when the wall structure 10 is heated due to a fire occurring within a building. Advantageously, the wall structure 10 of the present invention allows for relative sliding movement between a panel member 62 covering the wall structure 10 and an upper portion of the steel frame against which the panel member 62 is abutted. In this manner, the upper portion of the wall structure 10 may expand in relation to the panel member 62.
Referring more particularly to
The specific interconnection of the stud member 34 with the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 is shown and described in commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/979,214, entitled “Structural Members and Joining Arrangements Therefore,” and commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/146,534, entitled “Structural Members with Gripping Features and Joining Arrangements Therefore,” the entire contents of each being expressly incorporated by reference herein. More specifically, the above-mentioned commonly-owned patent applications disclose the above-described features which are formed on the terminus ends 26 of the stud member 34 as well as certain mating features formed along side walls 24 of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14, the stud members 34 may be initially engaged to the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 without the use of fasteners 64 such as screws. Thereafter, upon alignment and positioning of the stud members 34 to the desired location, fasteners 64 may be extended through side walls 24 of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 and stud members 34 in order to permanently connect such components.
As may be appreciated, the wall structure 10 of the present invention may be adapted for fabrication of various types of building walls such as partitioning walls and non-load bearing curtain walls. However, various other types of walls may be constructed using the wall structure 10 of the present invention. In this regard, the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 may each be adapted to be positioned along a surface such as along respective ones of a floor and a ceiling. As was earlier mentioned, the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 are preferably disposed in spaced parallel relation to one another wherein each of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 has a channel shaped cross-section with opposing terminus ends 26. More specifically, each one of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 comprises a planar and substantially flat web 18 which is defined by a pair of opposing, parallel longitudinal edges 22.
A pair of opposing, parallel and inwardly directed male protrusions 28 are integrally formed with and extend continuously along respective ones of the longitudinal edges 22. Although the male protrusions 28 may be provided in any cross-sectional shape, each of the male protrusions 28 preferably has a V-shaped cross-section as best seen in
Regarding the relative orientation of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14, as shown in
As best seen in
In this regard, such heating of the wall structure 10 results in a differential in the amount with which the metallic wall structure 10 increases in length with respect to the increase in length of the panel member 62 covering the metallic wall structure 10. As is well known, the coefficient of thermal expansion of metal is different than the coefficient of thermal expansion of wall board materials from which the panel member 62 is constructed. More specifically, commonly used panel members 62 such as drywall and gypsum board have a much lower coefficient of thermal expansion. Therefore, upon heating of the wall structure 10, the metallic structure increases at a greater length than the panel member 62. The inclusion of the telescopic mechanism 36 in the stud member 34 accommodates such differential heating such that the metallic structure can increase in length while the panel member 62 remains permanently affixed to a lower portion of the wall structure 10 and is only slideably disposed against an upper portion of the wall structure 10.
Referring more particularly now to
Regarding their particular construction, each of the slip extension 38 and stationary portions 46 generally comprises a substantially flat and planar web 18 which is defined by a pair of opposing, parallel arranged longitudinal edges 22. Integrally formed with the web 18 is a pair of substantially flat and planar side walls 24 which extend generally perpendicularly outwardly from the web 18 along the longitudinal edges 22. Each of the side walls 24 defines an opposing pair of side edges 68 which are oriented generally perpendicularly relative to the longitudinal edges 22. A pair of inwardly directed flanges 42 may be provided on each one of the side walls 24 of the slip extension 38 and stationary portion 46.
As best seen in
Referring briefly now to
Referring briefly now to
Referring now to
As can be seen in
Referring more particularly now to
As can be seen in
Referring now to FIGS. 6 and 8-9, shown is the wall structure 10 having an elongate top overcap 58 which may be secured in overlapping relationship to the top track 16. Constructed in a manner similar to that described above for the top and bottom tracks 16, 14, the top overcap 58 is comprised of a web 18 having a pair of side walls 24 extending generally perpendicularly outwardly therefrom. Each one of the side walls 24 includes at least one elongate male protrusion 28 formed along the side walls 24 on an edge thereof opposite the longitudinal edges 22 of the web 18. The male protrusions 28 are preferably inwardly directed and are also integrally formed with the side walls 24 of the top overcap 58. The male protrusions 28 are generally V-shaped and extend continuously along respective ones of the longitudinal edges 22.
As best seen in
In addition, the side walls 24 of the top overcap 58 are spaced apart so as to allow the male protrusions 28 to bear against outer surfaces of panel members 62 mounted on opposing sides of the wall structure 10. An alternative configuration of the top overcap 58 is shown in
Referring still to FIGS. 6 and 8-9, the panel member 62 includes an upper edge which is preferably disposed in spaced relation to the top overcap 58 web 18. A gap 70 is thereby defined between the web 18 of the top overcap 58 and the upper edge of the panel member 62. Advantageously, such gap 70 allows for contraction of the stud member 34 relative to the lower track such as may occur in an extreme reduction in temperature. The gap 70 thereby prevents contact between the panel member 62 and top overcap 58 which could otherwise result in buckling and/or damage to the panel member 62 and thereby compromise the sealing capability of the wall structure 10. Although any gap 70 may be provided, the gap 70 is preferably about ¾″ between the upper edge of the panel member 62 and the top overcap 58 web 18. Fire resistant capabilities of the wall structure 10 may be further enhanced by the installation of a compound 60 within the gap 70. Although any compound 60 may be used, the compound 60 is preferably a fire resistant or fire retardant compound 60 in order to resist heat and allow for appropriate expansion of the metal framing structure.
As can be seen in
The top overcap 58 is preferably configured such that at least one of the side walls 24 at least partially overlaps 66 the top track 16 side wall 24. Furthermore, the top overcap 58 preferably defines a width between the side walls 24 that is compatible to the width across opposing panel members 62 installed on each side of the wall structure 10. More specifically, the top overcap 58 is preferably configured such that the male protrusions 28 of the side walls 24 and the top overcap 58 slidingly bear against the outer surface of the panel member 62 to provide sealing of the wall structure W.
Referring now to FIGS. 7 and 10-11, shown is the wall structure 10 which may further comprise a stud overcap 54 and which may be mounted to the stationary portion 46 of the stud member 34. As can be seen in the figures, the stud overcap 54 is preferably disposed in non-connective overlapping relationship to the slip extension 38 and is only connected to the stationary portion 46 such as with mechanical fasteners 64 (i.e., sheet metal screws). The stud overcap 54 comprises a web 18 having a pair of side walls 24 extending perpendicularly outwardly therefrom. In this regard, the stud overcap 54 is generally a channel shaped cross-section. The stud overcap 54 is connected to the stud member 34 at the stationary portion 46 and, more particularly, may utilize at least one mechanical fastener 64 to interconnect a side wall 24 of the stud overcap 54 to a side wall 24 of the stationary portion 46 of the stud member 34.
The stud overcap 54 may further include an aperture 56 shown in FIGS. 7 and 10-11 as a generally square shaped cutout. Although any shape may be provided for the aperture 56, the aperture 56 is preferably sized and positioned relative to the slot 44 such that a fastener 64 may be passed through the stationary portion 46 side wall 2,4 and extended into the slot 44. In this manner, the stud overcap 54 may be securely mounted to the stud member 34 without inhibiting relative axial movement of the slip extension 38 within the stationary portion 46. An adjacent panel member 62 may thereby be fastened to the panel member 62 shown in
The assembly and operation of the fire rated wall structure 10 will now be described with reference to the figures. The top track 16 and bottom track 16, 14 are initially disposed in spaced relationship to one another. In this regard, the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 may be positioned along a flat surface such as a floor in accordance with measurements between a floor and ceiling to which the wall structure 10 is to be assembled. Alternatively, the top track 16 and bottom track 14 may be mounted along respective ones of the floor and ceiling and in general alignment with one another. Mechanical fasteners 64 may be extended through the webs 18 of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 and into respective ones of the floor and ceiling in order to secure the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 thereto.
In assembling and installing the stud member 34, one of the slip extensions 38 may be slidably inserted within one of the stationary portions 46 such that the female recesses 52 formed on opposing terminus ends 26 of the stud member 34 may be engaged to the male protrusions 28 formed along the top and bottom tracks 16, 14. Preferably, the stud members 34 are oriented in generally transverse or perpendicular placement relative to the top and bottom tracks 16, 14. Due to the slideable nature of the slip extension 38 relative to the stationary portion 46, the stud member 34 may be adjusted to the particular spacing between the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 in order to accommodate variations in floor to ceiling height such as may be caused by construction defects and/or building settling.
More specifically, the telescopic mechanism 36 incorporated into each of the stud members 34 allow for extension and retraction of the slip extension 38 relative to the stationary portion 46 in order to adjust the length of the stud member 34 to suit the floor to ceiling height. Upon installation of the stud member(s) 34 in the top and bottom tracks 16, 14, as is described in detail in commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/979,214 entitled “Structural Members and Joining Arrangements Therefore,” mechanical fasteners 64 such as self-tapping sheet metal screws may be inserted in an area adjacent the male protrusion 28 in order to secure the side walls 24 of the top and bottom tracks 16, 14 to the side walls 24 of the stud members 34 at the opposing terminus ends 26 thereof.
Preferably, the top overcap 58 is disposed in general abutting relationship with the top track 16 such that the respective webs 18 are in contacting engagement. The panel member 62 may then be mounted on the wall structure 10 such that a lower edge of the panel member 62 is secured to the side wall 24 of the bottom track 14 via a plurality of spaced apart fasteners 64. Likewise, fasteners 64 may be extended through the panel member 62 and into the side wall 24 of the stationary portion 46 in order to non-moveably affix the panel member 62 to the stud member 34 and bottom track 14. Additionally, at least one mechanical fastener 64 may be extended through the panel member 62 and passing through the side wall 24 of the stationary portion 46 such that the fastener 64 extends into the slot 44 formed in the slip extension 38.
Ideally, the panel member 62 is preferably sized and configured such that an upper edge thereof is disposed in spaced relation to the web 18 of the top overcap 58. As shown in
Optionally, the stud overcap 54 may be installed on the stud member 34 as shown in
As shown in
Additional modifications and improvements of the present invention may also be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the particular combination of parts described and illustrated herein is intended to represent only certain embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to serve as limitation of alternative devices within the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/780,099, entitled “FIRE RATED WALL STRUCTURE” filed on Mar. 8, 2006, and is related to pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/979,214, filed May 14, 2002, entitled “STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND JOINING ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/146,534, filed Jun. 7, 2005, entitled “STRUCTURAL MEMBERS WITH GRIPPING FEATURES AND JOINING ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR”, the entire content of each being expressly incorporated by reference herein.