Patent Application
20150079367
The present disclosure relates generally to fire resistant composite structures, and more particularly to fire resistant composite structures having a foam material and a geopolymer thermal protection layer.
Geopolymers are inorganic polymers. Geopolymers can be formed by reacting geopolymer precursors, such as aluminosilicate oxides and alkali silicates. Industrial by-products such as fly ashes, mine tailings, and/or bauxite residues, may be utilized to form some geopolymers.
Geopolymers have been used for various applications. Geopolymers can be advantageous, as compared to some other materials, in that geopolymers can utilize by-products currently treated as wastes to provide useful and valuable products and/or geopolymers can enhance product features across building materials markets. Additional uses of geopolymers are desirable.
The present disclosure provides a fire resistant composite structure having a foam material, a geopolymer thermal protection layer adhered to the foam material, and a facing adhered to the geopolymer layer. The geopolymer thermal protection layer can be formed by curing geopolymer precursors having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio in a range of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3
The present disclosure provides a fire resistant composite structure having a foam material located between a first facing and a second facing, a first geopolymer thermal protection layer located between the foam material and the first facing material, wherein the first geopolymer thermal protection layer is formed by curing geopolymer precursors having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio in a range of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3, and a second geopolymer thermal protection layer located between the foam material and the second facing.
The above summary of the present disclosure is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure. The description that follows more particularly exemplifies illustrative embodiments. In several places throughout the application, guidance is provided through lists of examples, which examples can be used in various combinations. In each instance, the recited list serves only as a representative group and should not be interpreted as an exclusive list.
Fire resistant composite structures having a foam material, a geopolymer thermal protection layer, and a facing are described herein. Embodiments of the present disclosure can provide improved fire resistance as compared to other panel approaches, such as panels not having the geopolymer thermal protection. Additionally, embodiments of the present disclosure can provide improved fire resistance as compared to other panel approaches, such as panels having a geopolymer layer that is formed from a composition that differs from the geopolymer precursor compositions used to form the a geopolymer thermal protection layer of the fire resistant composite structures disclosed herein. For example, the geopolymer thermal protection layer can be formed from a geopolymer precursor composition having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3. Surprisingly, geopolymers, e.g., the geopolymer thermal protection layer, formed from geopolymer precursor compositions having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3 can have improved strength and/or fire resistance as compared to other geopolymers that are formed from compositions with other silicon to aluminum mole ratio.
The fire resistant composite structures disclosed herein, may be useful for a variety of applications. For example, the fire resistant composite structures may be employed as structural insulating panels. Structural insulating panels can be used as a building material. Structural insulating panels can include a foam material, e.g., a layer of rigid foam, sandwiched between a first facing and a second facing, e.g., two layers of a structural board. The structural board can be organic and/or inorganic. For example, the structural board can be a metal, metal alloy, gypsum, plywood, and combinations thereof, among other types of board.
Structural insulating panels may be used in variety of different applications, such as walling, roofing, and/or flooring. Structural insulating panels may be utilized in commercial buildings, residential buildings, and/or freight containers, for example. Structural insulating panels may help to increase energy efficiency of buildings and/or containers utilizing the panels, as compared to other buildings or containers that do not employ structural insulating panels.
Structural insulating panels have desirable stability and durability properties. For example, structural insulating panels can last throughout the useful lifetime of the building or container employing the panels. Thereafter, the panels can be reused or recycled.
In the following detailed description of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration how one or more embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to practice the embodiments of this disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, electrical, and/or structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
The figures herein follow a numbering convention in which the first digit or digits correspond to the drawing figure number and the remaining digits identify an element or component in the drawing. Similar elements or components between different figures may be identified by the use of similar digits. For example, 104 may reference element “04” in
The foam material 104 may be thermoset foam, e.g. a polymeric foam that has been formed by an irreversible reaction to a cured state. The foam material 104 may be a polyisocyanurate foam, a polyurethane foam, a phenolic foam, and combinations thereof, among other thermoset foams. As an example, the foam material 104 may be a rigid polyurethane/polyisocyanurate (PU/PIR) foam. Polyisocyanurate foams can be formed by reacting a polyol, e.g., a polyester glycol, and an isocyanate, e.g., methylene diphenyl diisocyanate and/or poly(methylene diphenyl diisocyanate), where the number of equivalents of isocyanate groups is greater than that of isocyanate reactive groups and stoichiometric excess is converted to isocyanurate bonds, for example, the ratio may be greater than 1.8. Polyurethane foams can be formed by reacting a polyol, e.g., a polyester polyol or a polyether polyol, and an isocyanate, e.g., methylene diphenyl diisocyanate and/or poly(methylene diphenyl diisocyanate), where the ratio of equivalents of isocyanate groups to that of isocyanate reactive groups is less than 1.8. Phenolic foams can be formed by reacting a phenol, e.g., carbolic acid, and an aldehyde, e.g., formaldehyde. Forming the foam material 104 may also include employing a blowing agent, a surfactant, and/or a catalyst.
The foam material 104 can have a thickness 105 of 5 millimeters to 300 millimeters. All individual values and subranges from 5 millimeters to 300 millimeters are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the foam material can have a thickness from a lower limit of 5 millimeters, 7.5 millimeters, or 10 millimeters to an upper limit of 300 millimeters, 250 millimeters, or 200 millimeters. For example, the foam material can have a thickness of 5 millimeters to 300 millimeters, 7.5 millimeters to 250 millimeters, or 10 millimeters to 200 millimeters.
As illustrated in
In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 can be formed by curing geopolymer precursors, e.g., geopolymer precursors are included in a geopolymer precursor composition. Geopolymer precursors can react with other geopolymer precursors to form the geopolymer 112.
Geopolymer precursor compositions can include an aluminosilicate reactant. The aluminosilicate reactant is a geopolymer precursor. The aluminosilicate reactant is an aluminosilicate. Aluminosilcates are compounds that include an aluminum atom, a silicon atom, and an oxygen atom. The aluminosilicate reactant can be selected from the group consisting of fly ash, calcined clay, metallurgical slag, and combinations thereof.
Fly ash is byproduct that is formed from the combustion of coal. For example, electric power plant utility furnaces can burn pulverized coal and produce fly ash. The structure, composition, and other properties of fly ash can depend upon the composition of the coal and the combustion process by which fly ash is formed. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C618 standard recognizes differing classes of fly ashes, such as Class C fly ash and Class F fly ash. Class C fly ash can be produced from burning lignite or sub-bituminous coal. Class F fly ash can be produced from burning anthracite or bituminous coal. For one or more embodiments, the fly ash can be selected from the group consisting of Class F fly ash, Class C fly ash, and combinations thereof.
As used herein, “clay” refers to hydrous aluminum phyllosilicates. Clay can include variable amounts of iron, magnesium, alkali metals, and/or alkaline earth metals. Examples of clay include, but are not limited to antigorite, chrysotile, lizardite, halloysite, kaolinite, illite, montmorillonite, vermiculite, talc, palygorskite, pyrophyllite, biotite, muscovite, phlogopite, lepidolite, margarite, glauconite, and combinations thereof. Clay can undergo calcination to form calcined clay. The calcination can include exposing the clay to a temperature from 500° C. to 1000° C. for a time interval from 1 hour to 24 hours.
Metallurgical slag can be formed in a number of processes, including some processes employing a blast furnace. For example, metallurgical slag can be formed in a process that forms pig iron from iron ore. Some metallurgical slag can include 27 weight percent to 38 weight percent SiO2 and 7 weight percent to 12 weight percent Al2O3. Metallurgical slag can also include, CaO, MgO, Fe2O3, and MnO, for example.
Geopolymer precursor compositions can include an alkaline activator. The alkaline activator is a geopolymer precursor. Alkaline activation involves a reaction between aluminum silicates and/or compounds with alkalis and/or alkaline-earth elements in a caustic environment. For one or more embodiments the alkaline activator includes sodium silicate. Sodium silicate, as used herein, refers to compounds that include sodium oxide (Na2O) and silica (SiO2). The sodium silicate can have a weight ratio of SiO2/Na2O from 1.0 to 10.0, where the weight ratio is expressed as quotient of a weight of SiO2 divided by a weight of Na2O. All individual values and subranges from and including 1.0 to 10.0 are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, sodium silicate can have a weight ratio of SiO2/Na2O in a range with a lower limit of 1.0, 1.25, or 1.5 to an upper limit 10.0, 8.0, or 6.0, where the weight ratio is expressed as quotient of a weight of SiO2 divided by a weight of Na2O. For example, sodium silicate can have a weight ratio of SiO2/Na2O in a range of 1.0 to 10.0, 1.25 to 8.0, or 1.5 to 6.0, where the weight ratio is expressed as quotient of a weight of SiO2 divided by a weight of Na2O. Examples of sodium silicates include, but are not limited to, orthosilicate (Na4SiO4), metasilicate (Na2SiO3), disilicate (Na2Si2O5), tetrasilicate (Na2Si4O9), and combinations thereof. The sodium silicate may be utilized as a solid, a solution, or combinations thereof. Sodium silicate solution can include water. The water, of the sodium silicate solution, may be employed in an amount having a value that is from 40 weight percent to 75 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution, such that a weight percent of the sodium oxide, a weight percent of the silica, and the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution. All individual values and subranges from and including 40 weight percent to 75 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the water, of the sodium silicate solution, may in a range with a lower limit of 40 weight percent, 43 weight percent, or 45 weight percent to an upper limit 75 weight percent, 70 weight percent, or 65 weight percent, such that the weight percent of the sodium oxide, the weight percent of the silica, and the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution. For example, the water, of the sodium silicate solution, may be in a range of 40 weight percent to 75 weight percent, 43 weight percent to 70 weight percent, or 45 weight percent to 70 weight percent, such that the weight percent of the sodium oxide, the weight percent of the silica, and the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution. The alkaline activator can include an alkaline hydroxide. Examples of the alkaline hydroxide include, but are not limited to, sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide. The alkaline activator can be selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and combinations thereof. For embodiments including the alkaline hydroxide, the alkaline hydroxide may be employed in an amount having a value that is up to 50 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution, such that the weight percent of the sodium oxide, the weight percent of the silica, the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, and the weight percent of the alkaline hydroxide sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution. All individual values and subranges from greater than 0 weight percent and including 50 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the alkaline hydroxide may be employed in range with a lower limit of greater than 0 weight percent to an upper limit of 50 weight percent, 45 weight percent, or 40 weight percent, such that the weight percent of the sodium oxide, the weight percent of the silica, the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, and the weight percent of the alkaline hydroxide sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution. For example, the alkaline hydroxide may be employed in an amount having a value in a range of greater than 0 weight percent to 50 weight percent, greater than 0 weight percent to 45 weight percent, or greater than 0 weight percent to 40 weight percent, such that the weight percent of the sodium oxide, the weight percent of the silica, the weight percent of the water, of the sodium silicate solution, and the weight percent of the alkaline hydroxide sum to 100 weight percent of the sodium silicate solution.
Geopolymer precursor compositions can include a continuous medium. The continuous medium can include water. The continuous medium can be employed for dissolution and/or hydrolyses of one or more of the geopolymer precursors.
Geopolymer precursor compositions can include varying amounts of components for differing applications. The aluminosilicate reactant can be from 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent of a composition weight, such that the aluminosilicate reactant weight percent, an alkaline activator weight percent, and a continuous medium weight percent sum to 100 weight percent of the composition weight. All individual values and subranges from and including 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the aluminosilicate reactant can be in a range with a lower limit of 20 weight percent, 25 weight percent, or 30 weight percent to an upper limit of 80 weight percent, 75 weight percent, or 70 weight percent. The alkaline activator can be from 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent of the composition weight, such that the aluminosilicate reactant weight percent, the alkaline activator weight percent, and the continuous medium weight percent sum to 100 weight percent of the composition weight. All individual values and subranges from and including 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the alkaline activator can be in a range with a lower limit of 20 weight percent, 25 weight percent, or 30 weight percent to an upper limit of 80 weight percent, 75 weight percent, or 70 weight percent. The continuous medium can be from 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent of the composition weight, such that the aluminosilicate reactant weight percent, the alkaline activator weight percent, and the continuous medium weight percent sum to 100 weight percent of the composition weight. All individual values and subranges from and including 20 weight percent to 80 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the continuous medium can be in a range with a lower limit of 20 weight percent, 25 weight percent, or 30 weight percent to an upper limit of 80 weight percent, 75 weight percent, or 70 weight percent.
In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the geopolymer precursor compositions can have a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3. In other words, the geopolymer thermal protection layer is formed by curing geopolymer precursors having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3. All individual values and subranges from and including a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3 are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the geopolymer precursor compositions can have a silicon to aluminum mole ratio in a range with a lower limit of 1.0:0.1, 1.0:0.5, or 1.0:1.0 to an upper limit of 1.0:3.3, 1.0:3.1, or 1.0:2.9. For example, the geopolymer thermal protection layer can be formed by curing geopolymer precursors having a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of in a range from 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3, 1.0:0.5 to 1.0:3.1, or 1.0:1.0 to 1.0:2.9. As discussed, geopolymers, e.g., the geopolymer thermal protection layer, formed from the geopolymer precursor compositions having the silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3 can have improved strength and/or fire resistance as compared to other geopolymers that are formed from compositions with other silicon to aluminum mole ratios. While not being bound to theory, it is believed that the geopolymers formed from the geopolymer precursor compositions having the silicon to aluminum moles ratios of 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:3.3 form three dimensional structures, in contrast to some compositions having more silicon to aluminum, which form two dimensional structures.
Geopolymer precursor compositions can include an aggregate. As used herein, aggregate refers to an inert material, e.g. a material that is substantially unreactive with the geopolymer precursors of the geopolymer precursor compositions. The aggregate remains intact during the geopolymerization reaction. Examples of the aggregate include, but are not limited to, sand, gravel, crushed stone, or combinations thereof. The aggregate can be particulate, e.g., separate and distinct particles. The aggregate may be of differing sizes and/or shapes for various applications. The aggregate can have a particle size distribution with an average diameter from 0.0625 millimeters to 2.0 millimeters, as defined by ISO 14688, for example. All individual values and subranges from and including 0.0625 millimeters to 2.0 millimeters are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the aggregate can have a particle size distribution with an average diameter in a range with a lower limit of 0.0625 millimeters, 0.07 millimeters, or 0.08 millimeters to an upper limit of 2.0 millimeters, 1.90 millimeters, or 1.80 millimeters. For example, the aggregate can have a particle size distribution with an average diameter in a range of 0.0625 millimeters to 2.0 millimeters, 0.07 millimeters to 1.90 millimeters, or 0.08 millimeters to 1.80 millimeters. In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the aggregate can be substantially spherical. However, embodiments are not so limited. In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the aggregate can be substantially non-spherical. Examples of substantially non-spherical shapes include, but are not limited to, cubic shapes, polygonal shapes, elongate shapes, irregular shapes and combinations thereof. For embodiments including the aggregate, the aggregate may be employed in an amount having a value that is up to 70 weight percent of a total weight of a geopolymer thermal protection layer, where the total weight of the geopolymer thermal protection layer is the sum of weights of the aluminosilicate reactant, the alkaline activator, the continuous medium, and the aggregate. All individual values and subranges and including from greater than 0 weight percent to 70 weight percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the aggregate may be employed in a range with a lower limit of from greater than 0 weight percent, 10 weight percent, or 15 weight percent to an upper limit of 70 weight percent, 65 weight percent, or 60 weight percent. For example, the aggregate may be employed in a range of from greater than 0 weight percent to 70 weight percent, 10 weight percent to 65 weight percent, or 15 weight percent to 60 weight percent of a total weight of a geopolymer thermal protection layer, where the total weight of the geopolymer thermal protection layer is the sum of weights of the aluminosilicate reactant, the alkaline activator, the continuous medium, and the aggregate. The aggregate may help to reduce crack formation in the geopolymer, for example as compared to other geopolymers not including the aggregate. For some applications, cracks in the geopolymer can be undesirable. As an example, cracks can form in a geopolymer during curing of a geopolymer precursor composition and/or after the curing is complete.
In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the geopolymer precursor compositions can include an additional component, such as a hollow silicate material, among other additional components. Examples of hollow silicate materials include, but are not limited to glass spheres, aerogels, cenospheres, zeolites, mesoporous silicate structures, and combinations thereof. Aerogels include low density silicate structures produced by a sol-gel process. Cenospheres can be formed during a process of producing fly ash, for example. The hollow glass spheres may include an additive, such as alumina, for example. Zeolites include natural and synthetic alumina/silicates, for example, and may contain a metal cation. Mesoporous silicate structures include structures obtained by forming silica around an organic template that can be removed after the silica forms. For differing applications the additional component may be employed in various amounts.
As discussed herein, geopolymer precursor compositions can be cured to form the geopolymer 112, e.g., a geopolymer thermal protection layer 110. Geopolymer 112, e.g., the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110, can be represented by Formula I:
(M)y[-(SiO2)z—AlO2]x·wH2O
wherein each M independently is a cation of Group 1 of the Periodic Table of the Elements; x is an integer of 2 or higher and represents a number of polysialate repeat units; y is a rational or irrational number selected so that a ratio of y to x is greater than zero (y/x>0), and preferably from greater than zero to less than or equal to 2 (0<y/x≦2); z is a rational or irrational number of from 1 to 35; and w is a rational or irrational number such that ratio of w to x (w/x) represents a ratio of moles of water per polysialate repeat unit. The z represents a molar ratio equal to moles of silicon atoms to moles of aluminum atoms (Si/Al) in the polysialate. The distribution of the SiO2 functional groups in the geopolymer may be characterized as being random. Thus, z can be a rational or irrational number. Unless otherwise noted, the phrase “Periodic Table of the Elements” refers to the official periodic table, version dated Jun. 22, 2007, published by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
Geopolymer 112, e.g., the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110, can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions at a temperature of 20° C. to 150° C. All individual values and subranges from and including 20° C. to 150° C. are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, geopolymer can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions at a temperature in a range with a lower limit of 20° C., 25° C., 30° C. to an upper limit of 150° C., 140° C., or 130° C. For example, geopolymer 112 can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions at a temperature in a range of 20° C. to 150° C., 25° C. to 140° C., or 30° C. to 130° C. For various applications, the geopolymer 112 can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions for differing time intervals. The geopolymer 112 can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions for a time interval of less than one minute up to 28 days, for example. All individual values and subranges from and including less than one minute to 28 days are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the geopolymer can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions for a time interval in a range with a lower limit of less than one minute, one minute, or 5 minutes to an upper limit of 28 days, 24 days, or 20 days. For example, the geopolymer 112 can be formed by curing the geopolymer precursor compositions for a time interval in a range from less than one minute to 28 days, one minute to 24 days, or 5 minutes to 20 days. For one or more embodiments, the geopolymer precursor compositions can be applied to a substrate, e.g. such as the foam material 104 and/or facings 106, 108, discussed herein, and cured thereon. The geopolymer precursor compositions can be applied to the substrate by various procedures, such as dipping, spraying, rolling, troweling, or another procedure.
As illustrated in
The geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 can have a thickness 111 of 0.5 millimeters to 100 millimeters. All individual values and subranges from 0.5 millimeters to 100 millimeters are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 can have a thickness 111 from an upper limit of 100 millimeters, 80 millimeters, or 60 millimeters to a lower limit of 0.5 millimeters, 1 millimeter, or 2 millimeters. For example, geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 can have a thickness 111 of 0.5 millimeters to 100 millimeters, 1 millimeter to 80 millimeters, or 2 millimeters to 60 millimeters.
As discussed herein, the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 may provide improved fire resistance for the fire resistant composite structures 102, as compared to other panel approaches, such as panels not having the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 disclosed herein. For example, the geopolymer thermal protection layer 110 can help for the foam material 104 to receive less thermal energy, as compared to panels not having the geopolymer-aerogel composite layer 110, when exposed to similar heating. As an example, fire resistance can be determined by exposing a material, e.g., fire resistant composite structures 102, to heating from a furnace and thereafter measuring a temperature rise with time on a side of the material opposite to the furnace and/or at a certain distance across a thickness of the material. Achieving a lower temperature on and/or at a portion of the material, as compared to a corresponding temperature on another material, under similar furnace heating conditions can be considered an improved fire resistance. For some applications, varying the thickness of a geopolymer thermal protection layer and/or incorporating additional geopolymer thermal protection layers can help to provide an improved fire resistance.
As illustrated in
Referring again to
For one or more embodiments, the second geopolymer thermal protection layer 210-2 can be located between the foam material 204 and the second facing 208. Locating the second geopolymer thermal protection layer 210-2 between the foam material 204 and the second facing 208 may help to protect the foam material 204 from heat that can transfer from the second facing 208 to the foam material 204. Additionally, locating the second geopolymer thermal protection layer 210-2 between the foam material 204 and the second facing 208 may help to provide a lower temperature, for example, on a surface of the first facing 206 when the second facing 208 is exposed to a heat source, as compared to a panel not having the second geopolymer thermal protection layer 210-2 between the foam material 204 and the second facing 208.
As shown in
As shown in
The fire resistant composite structures 02, as disclosed herein, may be formed by a variety of processes. For example, the fire resistant composite structures 02 may be formed by a continuous process, such as a continuous lamination process employing a double conveyor arrangement wherein components of a geopolymer thermal protection layer 10 can be deposited, e.g., poured or sprayed, onto a first facing 06 surface, which may be flexible or rigid; then, a reaction mixture for forming a foam material 04 can be deposited, e.g., poured or sprayed, onto the curing geopolymer thermal protection layer components; then a second facing 08 surface can be contacted with the reaction mixture for forming the foam material 04. For various applications other formation processes may be employed. For example, the components of the second geopolymer thermal protection layer 10, can be deposited, e.g., poured or sprayed, directly onto an interior surface of the second facing 08 or alternatively on a substrate that will carry said curing geopolymer composition in between, the interior surface of the second facing and the curing foam forming composition. The said substrate will then remain incorporated at the foam-geopolymer interface. Additionally, the fire resistant composite structures 02, as disclosed herein, may be formed by a discontinuous process including depositing, e.g., pouring or spraying, the components of a geopolymer thermal protection layer on the first facing 06 and/or the second facing 08. Then the first and second facings, with their geopolymer thermal protection layers may be placed in a press and a reaction mixture for forming a foam material 04 can be deposited, e.g., poured or injected, between the first and second facings 06, 08.
The above description has been made in an illustrative fashion, and not a restrictive one. The scope of the various embodiments of the present disclosure includes other applications and/or components that will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
In the Examples, various terms and designations for materials were used including, for example, the following:
Sodium silicate solution (alkaline activator, Grade 52 sodium silicate solution, available from the Occidental Chemical Corporation); class F fly ash (aluminosilicate reactant, available from BORAL®); continuous medium (water, deionized, laboratory produced); facing (0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate); additional component (censopshere, CTB150, available from Ceno Technologies Inc.).
Geopolymer Precursor Composition
A geopolymer precursor composition was prepared as follows. Water (12.5 grams) and sodium silicate solution (37.5 grams) were added to a container and mixed. Class F fly ash (162.5 grams) and silica sand (50.0 grams) were added to the contents of the container and mixed with a high shear mixer at 700-90° rotations per minute (Model L1U08 mixer, available from LIGHTNIN®). The geopolymer precursor composition had a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.00:2.68.
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 1, was fabricated as follows. The prepared geopolymer precursor composition described above was cast into a die; then a foam material was pressed into the cast geopolymer precursor composition. The cast geopolymer precursor composition cured for 24 hours at 60° C. to form a 10 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer bonded to the foam material. The foam material was polyisocyanurate foam made with VORATHERM™ CN604 polyisocyanurate system having a thickness of 160 millimeters, available from The Dow Chemical Company. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™). No cracks were visually observed in the cast geopolymer.
Multiple Geopolymer Thermal Protection Layers
Geopolymer precursor compositions as described above were cast into a die and cured for 24 hours at 60° C. The cured geopolymers were cut to form a number of 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers, a number of 3 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers, and a number of 5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers.
Multiple Foam Materials
A foam material, which was a polyisocyanurate foam made with VORATHERM™ CN604 polyisocyanurate system, available from The Dow Chemical Company, was cut into a number of 8 millimeter thick foam materials, a number of 21 millimeter thick foam materials, a number of 59 millimeter thick foam materials, a number of 65 millimeter thick foam materials, and a number of 85 millimeter thick foam materials.
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 2, was fabricated as follows. Sequentially, a 5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, a 21 millimeter thick foam material, a 3 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, a 21 millimeter thick foam material, a 3 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, a 21 millimeter thick foam material, a 3 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, a 21 millimeter thick foam material, a 3 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, and a 59 millimeter thick foam material were secured together with thermal resistant tape. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the 5 millimeter geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 3, was fabricated as follows. Sequentially, a 5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 8 millimeter thick foam material, a 2 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, and a 65 millimeter thick foam material were secured together with thermal resistant tape. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the 5 millimeter geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
Comparative Example A was fabricated as follows. A foam material was formed. The foam material was polyisocyanurate foam made with VORATHERM™ CN604 polyisocyanurate system having a thickness of 160 millimeters, available from The Dow Chemical Company. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the foam material with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
Fire resistance of Examples 1-3 and Comparative Example A was tested as follows. A 76.2 millimeter by 76.2 millimeter hole was formed in the door of a THERMO SCIENTIFIC® Thermolyne Model 48000 furnace. The furnace was heated to 1000° C. following a temperature versus time curve in accordance to the one used in EN 1361-1 testing standard, which is the same heating curve in ISO-834-1. Each of the steel plates of Examples 1-3 and Comparative Example A was respectively clamped to the hole in the furnace door. Thermocouples were placed into the foam material of Example 1 at 10 millimeters, 80 millimeters, and 120 millimeters, as measured from the stainless steel plate exposed to the heat source to record temperatures and determine the fire resistance. Thermocouples were placed into the foam material of Example 2 at 80 millimeters and 120 millimeters, as measured from the stainless steel plate exposed to the heat source to record temperatures and determine the fire resistance. Thermocouples were placed into the foam material of Example 3 at 80 millimeters, 100 millimeters, and 120 millimeters, as measured from the stainless steel plate exposed to the heat source to record temperatures and determine the fire resistance. For experimental purposes Examples 1-3 did not include a second facing. Table 1 shows data corresponding to the temperatures for each thermocouple location for Examples 1-3 measured at one hour. Thermocouples were placed into the foam material of Comparative Example A at 10 millimeters, 80 millimeters, and 120 millimeters, as measured from the stainless steel plate exposed to the heat source to record temperatures and determine the fire resistance. Comparative Example A did not include a second facing. Table 2 shows data corresponding to the temperatures for each thermocouple location for Comparative Example A measured at one hour.
The data of Tables 1-2 shows the Example 1-3 temperatures at each thermocouple location were lower than Comparative Example A temperatures at each corresponding thermocouple for the same test times. The lower temperatures of Examples 1-3, as compared to those of Comparative Example A, indicate that each of Examples 1-3 has an improved fire resistance, as compared to Comparative Example A.
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 4, was fabricated as follows.
A geopolymer precursor composition was prepared as follows. Water (12.5 grams) and sodium silicate solution (37.5 grams) were added to a container and mixed. Class F fly ash (162.5 grams) and silica sand (50.0 grams) were added to the contents of the container and mixed with a high shear mixer at 700-90° rotations per minute (Model L1U08 mixer, available from LIGHTNIN®). The geopolymer precursor composition had a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.00:2.68. Two batches of the geopolymer precursor composition were each respectively cast into a die and cured for 24 hours at 60° C. The cured geopolymers had a density of 2.03 grams per cubic centimeter. The cured geopolymers were each formed into two 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers. Sequentially, a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 85 millimeter thick foam material, and a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, were secured together with thermal resistant tape. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the 7.5 millimeter geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 5, was fabricated as follows.
A geopolymer precursor composition was prepared as follows. Water (7.0 grams) and sodium silicate solution (14.3 grams) were added to a container and mixed. Class F fly ash (31.0 grams) and cenosphere (8.6 grams) were added to the contents of the container and mixed with a high shear mixer at 700-90° rotations per minute (Model L1U08 mixer, available from LIGHTNIN®). The geopolymer precursor composition had a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.00:2.65. Two batches of the geopolymer precursor composition were each respectively cast into a die and cured for 24 hours at 60° C. The cured geopolymers were each formed into two 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers. Sequentially, a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 85 millimeter thick foam material, and a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, were secured together with thermal resistant tape. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the 7.5 millimeter geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
A fire resistant composite structure, Example 6, was fabricated as follows.
A geopolymer precursor composition was prepared as follows. Water (8.0 grams) and sodium silicate solution (20.0 grams) were added to a container and mixed. Class F fly ash (21.5 grams) and cenosphere (13.9 grams) were added to the contents of the container and mixed with a high shear mixer at 700-90° rotations per minute (Model L1U08 mixer, available from LIGHTNIN®). The geopolymer precursor composition had a silicon to aluminum mole ratio of 1.00:2.74. Two batches of the geopolymer precursor composition were each respectively cast into a die and cured for 24 hours at 60° C. The cured geopolymers had a density of 0.92 grams per cubic centimeter. The cured geopolymers were each formed into two 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layers. Sequentially, a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, an 85 millimeter thick foam material, and a 7.5 millimeter thick geopolymer thermal protection layer, were secured together with thermal resistant tape. A 0.3 millimeter thick type 304 stainless steel plate was attached to the 7.5 millimeter geopolymer thermal protection layer with a non-foaming polyurethane (FoamFast 74, available from 3M™).
Fire resistance of Examples 4-6 was tested as follows as for Examples 1-3 and Comparative Example A. Thermocouples were placed into the foam material for each of Examples 4-6 at 100 millimeters, as measured from the stainless steel plates exposed to the heat source to record temperatures and determine the fire resistance. For experimental purposes, Examples 4-6 did not include a second facing. Table 3 shows data corresponding to the temperatures for each thermocouple location for Examples 4-6 measured at one hour, two hours, and two and a half hours.
Example 4 included two geopolymer thermal protection layers. As discussed and shown herein, the geopolymer thermal protection layer can provide an improved fire resistance as compared to other panel approaches, such as panels not having the geopolymer thermal protection, for instance Comparative Example A. The data of Table 3 show the Example 5-6 temperatures at the 100 millimeter thermocouple location were lower than and/or comparable to the Example 4 temperatures at the 100 millimeter thermocouple location for the same test times. The lower and/or comparable temperatures of Examples 5-6, as compared to Example 4, indicate that each of Examples 4-6 has an improved fire resistance, as compared to other panel approaches, such as panels not having the geopolymer thermal protection, for instance Comparative Example A.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US13/34118 | 3/27/2013 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61618044 | Mar 2012 | US |
