The present invention generally relates to a fire resistant steel structure.
Unprotected structural steel members like columns, girders, beams etc. lose most of their load bearing capacity when they are exposed to temperatures above 400 C. For warranting the required fire resistance rating in multistorey steel structures, it is well known in the art to use a fireproof heat insulation slowing down temperature rise in load bearing structural steel components. Known heat insulation measures comprise e.g.: fireproof encasements with slab-type materials made e.g. from calcium silicate or gypsum; mineral fiber insulations; spray applied fireproofing materials and intumescent paints or coatings. These fireproof insulations must generally be applied in-situ to all load bearing structural steel components, which is a costly and time-consuming operation.
It is also known to use composite profiles, i.e. steel profiles with a partial or full concrete encasement or, alternatively, concrete filled steel tubes. Such composite profiles have a substantially higher mechanical resistance in case of fire than bare steel profiles, i.e. they maintain their load bearing function much longer. However, they are also much heavier than bare steel profiles, which is a substantial disadvantage, in particular for horizontal load bearing structural steel members, as e.g. beams and girders. (In the following, the term “beam” will be used for designating beams as well as girders.)
A composite profile is e.g. described in EP 1 405 961, which is used to support pre-fabricated floor elements. The composite profile comprises a closed trapezoidal steel section, the inner volume of which is filled with concrete. The inner volume further comprises a couple of tendons anchored within the bar and arranged to provide pre-tensioning in such a way as to cause a bending moment opposed to that caused by the external load.
FR 1 544 207 relates to a pre-stressed composite metallic beam. It comprises a steel beam having a vertical web extending between two horizontal flanges. A pair of tie members from a steel with high limit of elasticity are anchored, at both ends of the beam, on the beam web, on both sides thereof, and in the vicinity of the neutral line. The tie members are bonded to the web by elements imposing them a curve, the lower point of which is located in the vicinity of the bottom flange, so that the efforts exerted on these elements and resulting from the tension of the tie members produce deformation stresses in the beam in the direction opposed to that of the deformation due to the load.
Document US 2007/0028551 describes a beam attachment system comprising two posts and a beam horizontally supported by the two posts. A beam tie is provided to compensate for the stress exerted by the beam on the posts. Accordingly, the beam tie is supported at the head of the posts and engaged in a passage inside the beam to support it. This system is designed so that the beam tie compensates, at least partially, for the moment exerted by the beam on the posts and hence retain the stability of the system.
It is a first object of the present invention to provide a fire resistant steel structure in which a load bearing beam maintains its load bearing function during the required time of fire exposure without necessarily necessitating costly and time consuming insulation measures or a heavy concrete encasement or filling.
This object is achieved by a fire resistant steel structure as claimed in claim 1.
It is further object of the present invention to provide a fire resistant steel-concrete floor structure having a good fire resistance even without expensive and time consuming insulation measures on the load bearing beams.
This object is achieved by a fire resistant steel-concrete floor structure as claimed in claim 19.
A fire resistant steel structure in accordance with the present invention comprises a steel beam for receiving a vertical load and a support structure for supporting the steel beam at two horizontally spaced locations (generally but not necessarily at both ends of the steel beam). At least one fire-resistant tension member, which has its ends anchored outside the steel beam in the support structure, is arranged in relation to the steel beam in such a way that when the steel beam is overheated and yields under its vertical load in case of severe fire conditions, the overheated beam rests on the at least one fire-resistant tension member and is vertically supported by the latter.
It will be appreciated that such an emergency backup support system will—by providing an external, collapse retarding catenary support mechanism for the overheated steel beam—substantially increase the time during which a bare steel beam maintains its load bearing function when it is overheated in case of a fire. It follows that a costly and time consuming application of a fireproof insulation onto the steel beam is not necessary, and that a bare steel beam (i.e. a steel beam without fireproof insulation or concrete encasement) may maintain its load bearing function in case of a fire at least as long as a heavy composite steel beam (i.e. a steel beam with a partial or full concrete encasement).
For this purpose, the fire-resistant tension member is advantageously designed in such a way as to be able to take essentially all of the load of the beam that yields during the fire. In other words, the fire-resistant tension member(s) is/are designed to be able to take, under the severe fire conditions, essentially all of the load that should be taken by the steel beam (i.e. the load taken by the beam without fire—as in the cold state).
Preferably, the tension member shall be able to take during the fire at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% of the load taken by the beam in the cold state.
It is to be noted that, as will be explained in more detail below, the fire-resistant tension member may be a tension member having appropriate mechanical performance (in particular an appropriate tensile strength) that is protected against the fire, thus forming a fire-protected tension member. Alternatively the fire-resistant tension member may be a tension member having appropriate mechanical performance (an appropriate tensile strength) and having an inherent good fire resistance, i.e. it keeps a good tensile strength even at high temperatures (of major interest is the range above 600° C., more specifically 600 to 1100° C.).
It will further be appreciated that efficiently using an inherently fire resistant tension member or protecting a slender tension member with a fireproof heat insulation is by far easier, less costly and less time-consuming than applying such a fireproof heat insulation to the steel beam itself. Furthermore, such fire-resistant tension members result in a smaller surcharge of the support structure than a partially encased composite steel beam (with reinforced concrete between the flanges).
In a preferred embodiment, the at least one fire-resistant tension member extends along the steel beam, e.g. parallel to a beam web. In this embodiment, at least one intermediate support member is advantageously arranged on the steel beam, in such a way that when the yielding overheated steel beam rests via the at least one intermediate support member on the at least one fire-resistant tension member and is vertically supported by the latter. However, the overheated steel beam may also rest directly with a lower flange (or any other beam element) directly on the at least one fire-resistant tension member when it yields under its vertical load.
The at least one intermediate support member arranged on the steel beam is advantageously integrated in a transversal web-stiffener, which is e.g. equipped with a through hole or a cut-out for the at least one fire-resistant tension member. Alternative embodiments of intermediate support members comprise e.g. studs or hooks fixed to the beam or cut-outs or holes in an element of the beam itself (as e.g. a flange or web).
In an optimized embodiment for force transmission between the steel beam and its emergency backup support system, a series of intermediate support members are arranged on the steel beam so that the at least one fire-resistant tension member has a polygonal shape approximating a parabola. The more intermediate support members are foreseen, the better the fire-resistant tension member approximates the optimal parabola shape and the better force transmission between the steel beam and its emergency backup support system is. However, for reasons of economy, the steel beam will most often comprise not more than three intermediate support members, which are generally sufficient to warrant the required ISO fire resistance for the steel beam.
In an alternative embodiment, the emergency backup support system for the steel beam includes at least one fire-resistant tension member arranged transversally to the steel beam. When the overheated steel beam yields in this embodiment, it rests on the at least one transverse fire-resistant tension member, e.g. directly with its lower flange or by means of an intermediate support member. Such a solution with at least one fire-resistant tension member arranged transversally to the steel beam may be of particular advantage in combination with a cellular steel beam having apertures in its web. This is because a transverse fire-resistant tension member does not impede the passage of conduits through the apertures in its web of the cellular steel beam.
Preferably, the at least one fire-resistant tension member is only slightly pre-stressed when the steel beam is cold, so as to have a sufficient reserve for supporting the overheated steel beam. Under the maximum load of the cold beam, the prestress tension in the at least one fire-resistant tension member should preferably not exceed 25%, more preferably not more than 15% of the tensile strength of the tension member. The slight prestress tension shall e.g. warrant that there is no substantial play in the anchoring of the ends of the fire-resistant tension member and that the tension member is already in close contact with beam when a fire breaks out, i.e. that the at least one fire-resistant tension member is capable of developing a catenary support mechanism for the overheated beam as soon as the latter begins to yield in case of a fire. It is however to be noted that the fire-resistant tension member does not need to play a structural role in the cold state so that it does not need to be pre-stressed. This greatly facilitates the installation of such tension members.
In order to increase the fire resistance of existing steel structures, this system is very suitable to be applied for two reasons. First, the installation is easy since it requires neither complicate erection phases nor pre-stressing technology. Second, since it is active only in fire condition, it does not require changing the statical functionality of the structure in cold condition.
In a preferred embodiment, a double-T shaped steel beam with an upper flange, a lower flange and a web connecting the upper flange to the lower flange, comprises on each side of the web, at least one fire-resistant tension member that is anchored in the support structure and extends along the web between the upper flange and the lower flange. Intermediate support members are arranged on both sides of the web, symmetrically in relation to the latter. It follows that when the overheated steel beam yields under the vertical load, it rests via the intermediate support members on the fire-resistant tension members and is vertically supported by the latter symmetrically in relation to the web.
The steel beam is preferably supported by the support structure in such a way that it may axially expand when heating up under severe fire conditions, whereby excessive compressive axial forces in the beam, which may cause a buckling of the latter, are avoided.
The support structure may comprise a H-shaped steel column with two flanges and a concrete filling between the flanges, wherein a first end of the steel beam is fixed to a first of the two column flanges, and one end of the fire-resistant tension member passes through a through-hole in this first column flange and is provided with an anchoring element that is embedded in the concrete filling between the column flanges.
A first embodiment of the at least one fire-resistant tension member, it may advantageously comprise a high strength steel strand (or any equivalent tension member) provided with an envelope filled with a fireproof mortar or grout.
The at least one fire-resistant tension member may alternatively comprise a high strength steel strand (or any equivalent tension member) provided with an intumescent coating, an intumescent paint, an intumescent sleeve, a sprayed fire insulating material or a fireproof insulation sleeve.
Besides, as previously mentioned, the fire-resistant tension member may be a tension member having appropriate tensile strength and having an inherent good fire resistance. In this case, one may use any appropriate material, presently existing or to be developed, having a tensile strength which does not severely drop even at high temperatures, namely above 600° C.; the material may be in the form of tendons, wires, strand or fibers that may be assembled to form a tension member of larger section.
Those skilled in the art may identify suitable non-metallic materials, namely synthetic materials having a high elastic limit and showing good fire resistance, and typically materials allowing the manufacture of a tension member with a tensile strength of at least 500 MPa at high temperatures (above 600° C.).
The present invention also provides a fire resistant steel-concrete floor structure comprising a concrete slab and a support structure for the concrete slab including at least one steel beam. At least one fire-resistant tension member having its ends anchored outside the steel beam in the slab is arranged relative to the steel beam in such a way that when said steel beam is overheated and yields under its load in case of severe fire conditions, the overheated beam rests on the at least one fire-resistant tension member and is vertically supported by the latter, the fire-resistant tension member being designed to be able to take essentially all of its load.
The at least one fire-resistant tension member has its ends anchored in the concrete slab advantageously in direct vicinity of a support column or an other vertical support member. This warrants that the tensile force in the tension member exerts no significant bending moment onto the steel beam or the slab.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The columns 12, 12′ shown in
The steel beam 14 shown in
It will be noted that the steel beam 14 is supported between the columns 12, 12′ in such a way that it may axially expand when heating up under severe fire conditions, thereby avoiding excessive compressive axial forces in the steel beam 14. Such a free expansion can easily be implemented by providing e.g. a double web cleated connection (as identified e.g. with reference number 26 in
Reference number 30 identifies a fire-resistant tension member, which forms an emergency backup support system for the steel beam 14, when the latter yields under severe fire conditions. This fire-resistant tension member 30 has its ends anchored outside said steel beam 14. The first end 32 of the fire-protected tension member 30 is e.g. equipped with an anchor 34 cooperating with the flange 28 of the column 12 for anchoring it on the column 12, and the second end 32′ is e.g. equipped with an anchor 34′ cooperating with the flange 28′ of the column 12′ for anchoring it on the column 12′. In accordance with a general principle underlying the present invention, the fire-resistant tension member 30 is arranged in such a way that when the overheated steel beam 14 yields under its vertical load in case of severe fire conditions, it rests on the fire-resistant tension member and is vertically supported by the latter. Due to its fire resistance, the tension member 30 keeps its load bearing capacity longer than the unprotect beam 14. The tension member 30 is thus advantageously designed to be able to take essentially all of the load of the beam under the severe fire conditions.
It will be appreciated that using a fire-resistant tension member is by far less costly and time-consuming than providing a passive fire protection to the steel beam 14 itself.
Hence, under fire conditions, the tension member or members will progressively take up the load that is no longer taken by the yielding beam, and the design of the tension member is made so as to be able to support essentially all of the weight of the beam together with the vertical load received by the beam, and this during the fire. This is possible, firstly, since the tension member 30, respectively the group of tension members, is/are: (a) dimensioned to be able to take essentially all of the load taken by the beam (preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%, or possibly up to nearly 100%). And secondly because the tension member(s) is/are fire resistant, either by the help of a protective coating or due to inherent fire resistance of the material from which the tension member is made. As it is known, the tensile strength (rupture point) of a metallic material is temperature dependent. What matters here is that the fire-resistant tension members be able to withstand the load supported by the beam (and of the beam itself) during a certain time of fire exposure. The materials for the tension members, and the possible amount of fire protection, is thus to be selected keeping this aspect in mind. It is however clear that the when exposed to fire, the tensile strength of the tension members may however decrease, but still remain at a level sufficient to bear the load of the beam.
In summary, a tension member, whether protected or inherently fire resistant, shall advantageously be designed so as to be able to keep a bearing capacity at room temperatures above 600° C., more preferably in the range of 600° C. to 1100° C., sufficient to take essentially all of the load of the yielding beam. Room temperatures between 600° C. and 1100° C. are in Civil Engineering typically the consequence of a severe fire.
where F is the force in the tension member; Q is the load on the beam (the load of the beam itself is actually negligible but can be taken into account in Q); l is the span of the beam; d is the distance between the top and low points of the tension member along the beam (function of the initial given shape and of the beam deflection); S is the section of the tension member and Ts is the tensile strength (rupture point). Of course, one shall use a coefficient of security in these calculations.
In the preferred embodiment shown in
It will be appreciated that force transmission in the emergency backup support system for the overheated steel beam 14 may be optimized by providing a series of such intermediate supports on the steel beam 14, wherein these intermediate supports are advantageously arranged so that the fire-resistant tension member 30 has a polygonal shape approximating more or less a flat parabola, with its minimum near the lower flange in the middle of the steel beam 14. Furthermore, if the steel beam 14 has a web 24 and a vertical plane of symmetry (such as e.g. a double-T beam as shown in
Instead of having fire-resistant tension members 30 extending between the upper flange 20 and the lower flange 22 parallel to the web of the steel beam 14, the emergency backup support system for the overheated steel beam 14 could also include one or more fire-resistant tension members (not shown) arranged transversally to the steel beam 14, wherein the overheated steel beam 14 could e.g. rest directly with its lower flange on the fire-resistant tension member. Such an arrangement of transverse fire-resistant tension members could support more than one steel beam. It may be of particular advantage when used in combination with cellular steel beams.
For computing the diagrams of
Referring now to
In
In
In summary, it has been seen that the tension member, or group of tension members, are designed and arranged in such a way to be able to support the beam and its load under severe fire conditions (typically at high temperatures above 600° C. and preferably in the range of 600° C. to 1000° C.), for a desired exposure time.
The required load bearing capacity for the tension member(s) is determined from the load to be supported by the beam and the beam weight in cold conditions. And the tension member(s) are thus able to withstand this load under severe fire conditions, due to the fact that they are fire protected or made from a material having inherently good fire resistance. In other words, the tensile strength of the tension members, during fire exposition, is still sufficient to support essentially all of the load, preferably at least 70%, more preferably least 80% of the load constituted by the beam and the load supported by the latter without fire.
In addition, the number of intermediate supports has an incidence on the resistance of the structure over time during ISO testing. The number of intermediate supports is advantageously designed in such a way to reach the desired fire resistance of the system. As a simplified approach, the beam 14 with the tension members 30 can be considered as a continuous girder over x supports, where x−2 is the number of intermediate supports provided by the tension member deviation device. In pratical applications, two or three deviators will be sufficient for most of the cases.
It may be noted that a tension member may be associated with several aligned beams, in which case it may be supported in the two columns directly neighboring the beam, but the tension member may still be extended and pass through one column to support the next beam and so on. In such case, the tension member may be anchored only in the extremity columns.
The skilled person may select for the tension members other materials having an appropriate tensile strength to take the load of the beam and having a better fire resistance, to be used with or without fire-protective coating.
For example, fire resistant steel may be used. Fire-resistant steels have been widely developed in Japan or in Germany and their specifity is to keep a significant percentage of their tensile strength even at high temperatures. For example, they can have still 93% of the initial tensile strength until 600° C. For increased safety, a fire-resistive coating may however still be used. Stainless steel may e.g also be used, preferably with a fire-resistive coating.
Those skilled in the art may alternatively identify suitable non-metallic materials, namely synthetic materials having a high tensile strength and showing an intrinsic good fire resistance, capable without fire protection of taking the load under severe fire conditions.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/005478 | May 2009 | IB | international |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP10/56036 | 5/4/2010 | WO | 00 | 12/5/2011 |