A notice of proposed rulemaking has been issued by U.S. DOT that may require one or more of several additional measures to protect aircraft against lithium battery fires. It is expected to become law in 2012. The new law may have a short time of compliance, in fact the proposed rule states the time of compliance will be only seventy-five days.
There is a need for air freight carriers to convert their lower deck cargo compartments of their airplanes to Class C compartments by providing them with a FAA approved smoke detection and fire suppression system. In addition, many air freight carriers seek an alternative solution that is capable of providing fire protection everywhere in the cargo compartments of their air carrier aircraft fleet. Obviously, everywhere includes in the main cargo area as well as in the lower lobe cargo compartments. In all of these cargo compartments may be Unit Load Devices (ULDs) and pallets—which can be covered with blankets or nets, hereinafter all referred to as “ULDs.”
It would therefore be beneficial to have a traditional fire suppression system (“FPS”) for the lower deck cargo compartments, and an additional solution to be used in conjunction or separately with the traditional (i.e. Halon) FPS used on these aircraft.
Earlier fire suppression devices often employ gaseous, liquid, or water-based foam products that are released into the cargo hold or individual freight containers (ULDs for example), and are usually intended to: 1) cover the burning cargo inside the ULD and create an oxygen-depriving medium (for example a foam system used and owned by Federal Express), 2) create an inert atmosphere inside the ULD, as with the Vulcan or Halon/Halon Replacement gaseous extinguishing systems, 3) create a cooling medium, such as provided by water misting technology, or 4) retard a fire's propagation.
As applied to cargo carried on aircraft, the earlier methods relied upon the ULD containing a foam, gas, protected structure, or water-mist system. Some agents proposed in earlier methods have properties which are toxic, corrosive, subject to freezing, have short-lived durations of protection (usually due to the inability of the ULD to sufficiently overcome leakage) or have a combination of these characteristics, all detracting from a reliable and simple method of controlling fires likely to occur today in a ULD.
Most early foam suppression systems operate on the principle that oxygen deprivation or suffocating the fire is sufficient to extinguish a fire. There are cases, however, where a fire is too strong and oxygen deprivation and suffocation simply is not enough. In addition, once depressurization of the aircraft occurs the necessary amount of foam or gas mixture may leak out, or be forced out, of the aircraft and therefore not sufficiently extinguish the fire; and/or when the aircraft descends the air density inside will again be sufficient to support a fire. Accordingly, there is a need in the art to provide oxygen deprivation but offer a system that will, in addition, substantially seal off the fire and fight the fire through char formation and/or intumescence chemical action.
Earlier fire suppression systems generally employ a means within or from the ULD's to interface with the aircraft systems and/or the operational personnel. Some early fire suppression systems provide merely a means to warn the crew of a fire and others allow the crew some control the ULDs fire suppression device and the response of the related fire suppression systems.
None of the earlier crew interface means provide protection of the interface device that detects the fire and communicates with the crew from explosions and projectiles capable of damaging the interface device; thus, preventing the interface means from performing its intended functions. Therefore, there is a need in the art to provide a fire suppression system that is protected against explosions and projectiles.
Moreover, weight, volume, and the cost to maintain products in airworthy condition are all critical in air freight operations. Earlier proposed fire suppression systems included adding the fire suppression means in all of the ULDs or throughout the aircraft itself. In other words, a built-in solution. However, these proposed systems are not optimal because they add unnecessary weight to the overall load of the air freight plane because the additional fire protection may not be needed for all freight depending on type. The proposed earlier fire suppression systems add about sixty (60) pounds to each ULD carried by the air freight planes used. Thus, there is a need in the art for a fire suppression system that weighs less than sixty (60) pounds, and/or can be selectively placed in ULD's that pose an increased risk of a fire not suppressible with standard fire suppression systems. Further, there are also no standards or practices to determine, before each use, the airworthiness of a ULD with such added fire suppression means.
Built-in systems also pose cost and reliability concerns. The costs to develop, certify, and maintain built-in systems are often substantial. The reliability of some of these devices and/or built-in systems is unknown unless developed and analyzed simultaneously with a proper Safety Assessment.
ULDs are typically subject to very rough treatment and storage conditions. To Applicant's knowledge, there are currently no discussions, procedures, or instructions to evaluate ULD normal wear and tear on the ability of the means to perform its intended function. There are no standards directed to repair and service of ULDs or about the minimum equipment list (MEL) dispatch requirements for a fire suppression means, the ULDs, or aircraft containing the ULDs and the fire suppression means. Fires are not likely to occur outside of the ULDs located in the main and lower lobe compartments because the freight is only located in these ULD containers. Thus, the source of a fire is most likely to be the freight inside of the ULD, and often the risk may be limited to only a few ULDs on each carrier that contain materials, such as lithium batteries, that pose substantial and unique fire threats.
Similar, pallets or boxes in trailers of one of the millions of over-the-road tractors may include materials that pose a fire risk. Thus, there is a need in the art for a fire suppression system that can be configured to be installed in the trailers of semi-trucks to protect the cargo and contents of the trailer. Further, as more and more cars and trucks are being offered with a hybrid or all electronic drive systems, there is a concern of the battery bundles being ignited and burning after a crash, a particular shortcoming has been observed in side impact collisions. Once the lithium (or other long range) batteries are exposed or broken, there is the chance of spontaneous ignition and the fires of these metals are very difficult to extinguish. Thus, there is a need in the art for a fire suppression system that can adequately contain and extinguish such a fire in over-the-road trailers and the battery enclosures of hybrid or electric cars.
There are three (3) phases of a fire—the incipient phase, the visible smoke phase, and the heat and flame phase. The most reliable and effective fire protection systems are those which deploy in the early phases of a fire. Otherwise, a fire is much more difficult to bring under control and it causes much more damage once the fire is in the heat and flame phase.
Since depressurizing the cargo compartment(s) of a freighter aircraft is one traditional means to suppress a fire, the traditional fire suppression system (Halon) cannot be activated until after these compartments are depressurized. Otherwise, if the traditional fire suppression system is first deployed the extinguishing agent will be forced out of the airplane and what agent remains, if any, will be too diluted to be effective. Thus, there is an exposure to a growing fire during the time to depressurize the aircraft and for the aircraft to reach a cabin altitude where there is insufficient oxygen to support a fire.
The present invention is directed toward a fire suppression system that includes a system for discharging a two-part foam fire suppressant that will fight a fire through oxygen deprivation and char formation and/or the formation of an intumescent layer capabilities. The present invention generally includes a first foam component in a container and under pressure, and a second foam component in a container and under pressure. The present invention further includes a smoke/heat detector in electronic communication with a triggering device that acts to discharge the first and second components simultaneously. The present invention is configured to allow for the foam components to be discharged at different pressures and velocities to result in the desired component mixture ratio. The two components are mixed in a mixing conduit and travel through at least one discharge conduit and the liquid mixture is sprayed out through at least one nozzle wherein the foam expands and cures into a substantially rigid foam.
The fire suppression system of the present invention has numerous configurations of regulators, valves, and shut-off valves that can be optimized to result in the performance characteristics desired by the operator of the fire suppression system. These valves or regulators may be automatically controlled to result in operation of the system at will or as a result of being triggered by the presences of smoke and or rapid heat change, or by any other triggering mechanism now known or hereafter developed, including an impact switch similar to those used to release automotive airbags during a crash.
An embodiment of the fire suppression system of the present invention may be configured to be self contained in an exterior case approximately the size of a suit case. This embodiment may be used in ULDs carried on airplanes on a case-by-case basis or, it may be used across the board in every ULD depending on the then-current regulations and particular industry standards. Other embodiments may be similarly configured to match the needs of the particular freight moving vehicles or vehicles carrying components that have a unique fire risk including: cars, hybrid or electric cars, over-the-road trucks, boats, trains, barges, planes, vans, or any other vehicle or enclosure used to contain or transport materials.
Embodiments of the fire suppression system of the present invention have distinct advantages and features over current systems as follows: it suppresses fires hidden in ULDs; it suppresses the smoke of a fire in a ULD; it has a long duration of protection once released; the exterior case is hardened against the effects of explosions or damage by projectiles; it can have tracking device to track the use, service, maintenance, and origin information; it does not require FAA certification; it saves weight because it can be used selectively by a carrier on or in only those ULD's considered of highest risk; it saves maintenance and service costs over current systems related to continued airworthiness and disposal of chemicals; it is extremely reliable, safe, and easy to use and requires no crew actions, but is capable of being connected to a monitoring system if desired; it is reusable if it is not otherwise released and is in airworthy condition; it is light weight; it is rugged; it may be configured to have a long shelf-life; it is non-corrosive; it will not freeze in the expected environment of use; the foam may be cleaned up after use using safe methods and solvents; it will not damage the aircraft or other vehicle or its furnishings or structure; it can be used in ULDs on or off the airplane, in storage, or during land or sea transport of cargo in ULDs or other containers; and it is available in sizes to match container volume requirements.
Another advantage of the present invention is the rigid foam system will control a fire for a limited time even if depressurization occurs in the enclosure containing the freight. Because there is an exposure to a growing fire during the time to depressurize the aircraft and for the aircraft to reach a cabin altitude where there is insufficient oxygen to support a fire, the present invention provides effective fire protection during the period of time from the beginning of a fire until reaching a cabin altitude where there is no longer sufficient oxygen for a fire to continue. Further, after a fire event has occurred, the present invention provides effective fire protection during a de-pressurized aircraft's descent when the air density in the affected cargo compartment(s) increases again to the point where a fire may re-ignite and cause further damage were it not for the presence of the present invention Further, once deployed, the present invention provides protection to 1st and second responders because it contains the fire, smoke, and fumes and may prevent or lessen the possibility of an sudden eruption of a dangerous fire or explosion.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawing figures.
In the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the specification and are to be read in conjunction therewith in which like reference numerals are used to indicate like or similar parts in the various views:
The following description of the invention illustrates specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. The embodiments are intended to describe aspects of the invention in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments can be utilized and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention is directed to a fire suppression system 10 used to disperse a two part fire retarding foam chemical agent. Fire suppression system 10 of the present invention comprises a pressure source 12, a first component tank 14, a second component tank 16, a mixing tube 18, at least one nozzle 20, and a heat/smoke sensor 22.
As shown in
Second and third variable pressure regulators 30 and 32 allow a user or a technician to individualize the pressure exerted upon the each of the components A and B of a fire suppressing foam. This feature allows one system to be used for any number of fire suppression foams because the variable pressure combinations allows a technician or user to set the pressure for each tank to provide the desired mixture proportions to result in a foam that has the desired physical properties when cured. For example, many two-part foams have a 50-50 mix rate and some have a 55-45, 60-40, 70-30, or other mix rate. In many cases, when components are required to mix at a 50-50 rate, the pressures will be substantially the same. However, there may be cases each component may have such a different viscosity and each component requires different pressures to be mixed to a 50-50 ratio. Moreover, the expanded foam resulting from two components may have different physical properties by varying the mixture proportion. For example, expanding foam may be substantially rigid using a 50-50 mixture proportion and may be slightly elastic when using a 60-40 mixture proportion. Therefore, the system of the present invention is configured to allow users and technicians to best optimize the performance of system 10 by allowing each tank 14 and 16 to be pressurized at different pressures to obtain different flow rates thereby controlling the mixing rate.
Alternatively, in-line fixed area orifices (not shown) within the conduit can be used as a pressure regulator to regulate pressure and/or flow depending on the pressure used. The orifices can be the same size and operating under a certain pressure to provide an equal flow of part A and B, or the orifices may be of different areas to result in different flow rates from the component tanks to create the desired component mixing ratio as further described above.
First and second component tanks 14 and 16 are configured to each contain one part of a two-part fire suppressing foam that is to be distributed using the system of the present invention to suppress and extinguish fires. For example, first component tank 14 contains part A and second component tank contains part B. First and second component tanks can be sized to provide the amount of particular component desired to provide fire suppression for a certain amount of time and/or a certain volume of container. Component tanks 14 and 16 may be of any material now known or hereafter developed that is used in pressurized tanks, including: steel, aluminum, titanium, brass, copper, any other industrial metal, carbon fiber, or high-strength polymer.
The foam may be a two-part urethane foam that forms a substantially rigid closed-cell foam. The foam has fire-resistant and insulative properties when fully cured. Moreover, the foam shall prevent air from passing through the foam and should form a substantially leak-proof barrier on the items it is applied to.
Fire suppression system 10 also includes a first outflow conduit 38 in fluid communication with first component tank 14. A first outflow pressure gauge/regulator 40 is operably connected to outflow conduit 38 and component tank 14. The pressure gauge/regulator 40 will most often be simply a pressure gauge when a separate pressure source 12 such as pressure tank 24 is used in the system. A pressure regulator 40 may be used when component tanks 14 and 16 are internally pressurized so that the user can control and set the outflow pressure. A second shut-off valve 42 is also operably connected to outflow conduit 38. Similarly, fire suppression system 10 also includes a second outflow conduit 46 in fluid communication with second component tank 16. A second outflow pressure gauge/regulator 48 is operably connected to outflow conduit 46 and component tank 16. A third shut-off valve 50 is also operably connected to outflow conduit 46. A person of skill in the art will appreciate that the particular order of regulator and/or shut-off valves along the fluid conduits can be selected by a person of skill in the art to maximize the particular configuration of the fire suppression system. Thus, the shut-off valves may be before the regulators in some embodiments.
Shut-off valves 42 and 50 prevent the foam components from entering the mixing conduit 18. The shut-off valves 42 and 50 may be opened or closed manually or using a control system. One embodiment of the present invention includes shut-off valves 42 and 50 being servo valves configured to be electronically triggered open or closed. Another embodiment includes shut-off valves 42 and 50 being manual valves having an open and a closed position. Yet another embodiment includes shut-off valves 42 and 50 opening automatically under a certain pressure threshold, so under normal storage and use conditions, the valves would be closed and upon applying the pressure from pressure tank 24, the valves would open to allow flow therethrough. Yet another embodiment includes a squib on the tank 14, 16, or 24 or incorporated into a valve or regulator that breaks a rupture disk releasing the contents of the tank. In addition to the shut-off valves and variable pressure regulators being manual and set and adjusted by hand, all shut-off valves and variable pressure regulators used in system 10 may include servo mechanisms or a squib that breaks a rupture disk that are configured to be controlled, open, closed or adjusted using electronic controls, or alternatively include other method now known or hereafter developed to selectively release contents of a tank upon the occurrence of a triggering event.
As further shown in
The mixed combination of first component and second component flows through mixing conduit 18 into one or more distribution conduit 50. Distribution conduit 50 is in fluid communication with mixing conduit 18 and nozzles 20. Distribution conduit 50 allows the mixed components of the foam to flow from mixing conduit 18 therethrough to exit out of the system 10 of the present invention and out of at least one nozzle 20. One embodiment includes plural-component nozzles 20 being about 3 inches in diameter and about 1 inch thick. An embodiment may include nozzle 20 having three (3) tubes connected to it, i.e. for the first foam component, the second foam component and for the gas used to froth the mixture of components created at the nozzles. The frothed mixture of fire retardant foam sprays in a radial direction from multiple holes (not shown) around the circumference of each nozzle 20. So, there may be more than one version of the fire suppression system 10 to accommodate the way the nozzles 20 need to be placed depending upon the vehicle, space, container, or compartment in which the system of the present invention is used.
As shown in
Exterior case 60 may also include a handle to carry the case and one or more latches 76 or other closure mechanism as shown in
Now turning to
First component tank 14 contains a first component of a two-part foam. The pressurized gas from gas tank 24 flowing through pressure conduit 34 applies a pressure on the first foam component such that when pressure gauge/regulator valve 40 is open, the first component exits an outflow end 82 of first component tank 14 into outflow conduit 38. A shut-off valve 42 may be coupled to outflow conduit 38 as shown. Shut-off valve 42 may be used to prevent the first foam component from entering the mixing conduit 18.
Similarly, second component tank 16 contains a second component of a two-part fire retarding foam chemical agent. The pressurized gas from gas tank 24 flowing through pressure conduit 34 applies a pressure on the second foam component such that when pressure gauge/regulator valve 48 is open, the second component exits an outflow end 84 of second component tank 16 into outflow conduit 46. A shut-off valve 50 may be coupled to outflow conduit 46 as shown. Shut-off valve 50 may be used to prevent the second foam component from entering the mixing conduit 18.
With shut-off valves 42 and 50 being open and both the first component and second component of the foam being under pressure, the two components of the foam will mix at junction 52 and be propelled through mixing conduit 18 wherein the two components will sufficiently mix through the turbulent flow in the pipe, an insert (not shown) in mixing conduit 18 that promotes mixing of the components, or a combination thereof. Mixing conduit 18 is in fluid communication with a central trunk 86. As shown in
In addition to the two part foam, one embodiment of the present invention includes central trunk 86 being configured to distribute the propellant from tank 24 and pressure conduit 34 directly out of nozzle 20e and into the environment. As shown in
As further shown in
In use, fire suppression system 10 of the present invention has many applications and can be configured to effectively suppress fires in a variety of transportation vessels and/or any contained space in which combustible material is stored.
Fire suppression system 10 can be placed in individual ULDs that contain freight that includes material posing a spontaneous fire risk such as lithium batteries or placed in every ULD 96 on the plane. In another embodiment not shown, fire suppression system 10 and exterior case 60 may be placed on top of ULD 96 wherein a seal is around an opening in the device's case and a matching hole in the top of ULD 96. The seal conducts smoke and heat from a fire inside ULD 96 into the device's smoke/heat detector 22. When placed on top of ULD 96 there are also matching holes in top 114 of ULD 96 for nozzles 20a-d.
If a fire begins in ULD 96, smoke will begin to be put-off by the smoldering fire. Smoke detector 22 may detect the presence of smoke in the second phase of the fire and if smoke/heat detector 22 does not detect the smoke, then it is also configured to detect heat put off in the third phase of the fire. Upon detection of either smoke or heat, smoke/heat detector 22 sends a signal to control panel 58 or directly to a regulator 26, 40 or 48 or shut-off valve 28, 42 or 50 depending upon the configuration of fire suppression system. The signal sent by smoke/heat detector 22 triggers the release of propellant from pressure source 12 (tank 24 in one embodiment) thereby effectuating the release of the first foam component from first component tank 14 and the second foam component from second component tank 16. The smoke/heat detector 22 or the control panel 58 may send a signal to the crew of the airplane or other transport vehicle to notify them of the presence of smoke and/or heat, operation of the system 10, or status of system 10.
Once the release of the two foam components is triggered and initiated, the two components mix in mixing pipe 18 and travel through central trunk 86 and out distribution channels 50f-i and out nozzles 20a-e in a spray pattern 102.
Now turning back to
As shown, upon triggering of fire suppression system 10 upon the presence of smoke and/or heat, the two-component foam system into ULD 96 during the smoldering or early stage of a fire in ULD 96 so that the liquid material can begin to expand into rigid foam 104 covering as much surface area as possible. The more foam material that can be sprayed the better because it forms a more uniform, homogeneous and thicker foam layer resulting in increased fire suppression protection.
When the two-component material has been sprayed and has formed into rigid foam then the flame and heat retardant protection begins through the char formation/intumescence chemical action of the cured foam. As shown in
An embodiment of the fire suppression system 10′ of the present invention will act as a fire suppressant in such instances. As shown, embodiment 10′ includes first component container 14 containing a first foam component and second component container 16 containing a second foam component wherein the component tanks 14 and 16 are pre-pressurized. First component container 14 and second component container 16 may, alternatively, be connected to a gas generator(s) controlled and triggered by sensors such as impact switches, smoke or heat detectors, or the like. This embodiment further includes a junction 52 that includes a servo valve to allow the flow from both component containers 14 and 16 when triggered. Smoke/heat detector 22 operably connected to battery enclosure 122 and is in electronic communication with junction 52. When smoke/heat detector senses the presence of smoke or heat in enclosure 122, it triggers valve in junction 52 whereby first and second component are released, pass through junction 52 into mixing pipe 18 and out nozzle 20 thereby filling enclosure 122 and suppressing any fire resulting from damage or disturbance of battery pack 120.
There several other functionalities that may be incorporated into the fire suppression of the present invention including: a disarm device that renders the device safe and prevents its operation; a monitoring device that allows for remote control or monitoring of the status and operation of the device using a computer, display device or hand-held device wherein the monitoring device is configured to indicate the conditions and/or status of system 10, which may include whether or not the device has discharged, a fire is sensed, or the pressures and other conditions of the propellant or liquid foam.
From the foregoing it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all ends and objects hereinabove set forth together with the other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the structure.
It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.
Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be understood that all matter herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative, and not in a limiting sense.
This Application is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/336,298 filed Dec. 23, 2011 to William Armand Enk, Sr. entitled “Fire Suppression System,” currently pending. This application further claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/428,614 having a filing date of Dec. 30, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/433,313 having a filing date of Jan. 17, 2011. The entire disclosures, including the specifications and drawings, of all above-referenced applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174550 | Bugg | Mar 1965 | A |
4351394 | Enk | Sep 1982 | A |
4566542 | Enk et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4779683 | Enk | Oct 1988 | A |
4981178 | Bundy | Jan 1991 | A |
7163642 | Hagquist et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7334644 | Ozment | Feb 2008 | B1 |
20060219416 | Fore et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080168798 | Kotliar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080314602 | Lohnes | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090084561 | Popp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100025053 | Chesley | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150174437 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61428614 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61433313 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13336298 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14641055 | US |