Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The invention relates to the field of firearms. More specifically, the invention comprises a bolt having a geometric element that prevents the bolt closing on a conventional cartridge and which will only allow the bolt to close on a modified cartridge.
The present invention may be adapted for use in a wide variety of firearms, including centerfire shotguns, rifles, and pistols. The invention may also be used with many other devices that use an explosive charge to launch a projectile, including grenade launchers. The invention is particularly suited for use with firearm bolts having a linear motion (as opposed to break-action designs). Such bolts are found in pump-action shotguns, semi-automatic shotguns, slide-action rifles, bolt-action rifles, semi-automatic rifles, and semi-automatic pistols. The illustrations in this disclosure focus on pump-action shotguns, as this type of weapon is widely used in the law-enforcement community. However, the reader should bear in mind that the invention may be used in other types of weapons and non-weapon launchers as well.
As those skilled in the art will know, breech bolt 10 must be locked in the closed position before the weapon can be fired (It is true that some weapons lire from an open bolt, but this is the exception and such a configuration is not shown in the views.). Locking toggle passage 14 passes through breech bolt 10 from top to bottom. Locking toggle 12 resides in this passage. Locking toggle 12 is employed to secure breach bolt 10 in the closed position and to perform other functions.
Extractor 20 is also connected to breech bolt 10. This claw-like component engages the rim on the base of a cartridge and pulls the cartridge out of the firing chamber when the bolt is moved rearward toward the open position. Other conventional features are also included in the bolt assembly. As these are well understood by those skilled in the art, they have not been depicted or described in more detail.
Propellant 50 is retained within wall 46 forward of the base wad. As those skilled in the art will know, when a firing pin strikes primer 36 the primer shoots burning gas into propellant 50 and ignites the shell. The burning propellant then forces the shot cup and projectiles down the bore and out of the weapon.
The shotgun shell construction shown in
Shotgun shells have traditionally been thought of as a “lethal force” device, meaning that they possess the ability to kill a human or animal target. Even when smaller shot sizes are used (#7 and higher) a shotgun shell has the capacity to kill at close range. Now, however, non-lethal, and “less-lethal” shotgun shells have been developed for crowd control and other purposes. Some of these shells employ soft projectiles and other means to deliver a stunning blow without the potential for the creation of a fatal wound. These cartridges may be generally referred to as “less-lethal cartridges.”
Less-lethal cartridges are currently fired from the same firearms used for lethal cartridges and this feet has created unintended results. In a situation where an individual or crowd of individuals must be engaged and subdued, police officers are acting quickly and in a heightened emotional state. In such a situation it is possible for an officer to accidentally load a lethal shotgun cartridge instead of the less-lethal cartridge he or she intended to load. The mistake may not be discovered until the weapon is fired.
It is desirable to provide a weapon for delivering a less-lethal/non-lethal cartridge that cannot be used to discharge a lethal cartridge. The present invention provides such a solution.
The present invention comprises a firearm configured to fire only a modified cartridge, while being unable to fire a conventional cartridge. The breech bolt in the inventive device includes an added geometric element that prevents the bolt closing on a conventional cartridge and which will only allow the bolt to close on a modified cartridge. The invention is particularly suited to firearms having a linearly reciprocating breech bolt, such as a pump-action shotgun. In the preferred embodiments, the face of the breech bolt is provided with a ring-shaped protrusion. The protrusion is centered on the central axis of the firing pin. A modified cartridge is provided with a ring-shaped recess in its base. The recess is sized and positioned to receive the ring-shaped protrusion on the bolt face, thereby allowing the bolt face to rest against the base of the modified cartridge as the bolt closes and locks in the firing position.
The inventive breech bolt is unable to close on a conventional (lethal) cartridge. In the case of a conventional cartridge, the ring-shaped protrusion on the bolt face of the preferred embodiment will bear against the cartridge base before the bolt has traveled forward to the locked position. A substantial gap between the bolt face and the base of a conventional cartridge is thereby created. Even if the firing pin is actuated, the nose of the firing pin will not be able to reach the primer of a conventional cartridge across this gap. Further, as most firearms contain a mechanism preventing discharge when the bolt is open, it is likely that the firing pin will not be actuated when the gap is present.
Thus, the inventive firearm is able to fire a modified cartridge but unable to fire a conventional (lethal) cartridge. On the other hand, the modified cartridge may preferably be fired in either an inventive firearm or a conventional firearm.
The present invention may be adapted for use in a wide variety of centerfire firearms. It is particularly suited to those firearms having a linearly reciprocating breech bolt. Thus, it could be applied to pump shotguns, semi-automatic shotguns, semi-automatic pistols, slide-action rifles, straight-pull rifles (such as the Blaser), and semi-automatic rifles, among other types. Exemplary shotgun applications include the Remington 870 pump shotgun, the Remington 1100-series semi-automatic shotguns, the Winchester SXP pump shotgun, the Browning Auto 5 semi-automatic shotgun, the Mossberg 500, and the Benelli Black Eagle-series shotguns. Because the Remington 870 is widely used in law enforcement, it is used in the attached illustrations. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate how the invention could be applied to many other firearm models and types.
As explained previously,
Still looking at
The inventive breech bolt of
As is known to those skilled in the art, breech bolt 10 mechanically locks to barrel extension 60 in order to secure the bolt for firing. Receiver 62 is largely non-structural. Instead, it serves to guide the motion of the bolt assembly and to mount other necessary items such as the trigger group and shell feeding mechanisms.
In contrast,
Second, as those skilled in the art will know, the vast majority of modern firearms incorporate mechanisms that prevent the forward movement of the firing pin when the bolt is not closed and locked. The Remington 870 shotgun used in these examples includes just such a mechanism. Thus, if the trigger is pulled in the condition shown in
In the version shown in
It is helpful for the reader to understand how the invention operates in the typical chambering, firing, and ejection cycle of a firearm.
A user opens the bolt on a Model 870 by grasping forend 70 and pulling it toward the rear (This assumes that the gun has been fired. If the hammer is still cocked a separate release mechanism must be actuated before the forend can be moved). Forend 70 slides forward and rearward on a cylindrical magazine tube. A pair of action bars 68 are connected to the forend. Slide lug 66—in turn—is connected to the action bars. When a user pulls the forend toward the rear, the action bars move toward the rear and carry slide lug 66 with them.
As may be seen in the view, slide lug 66 rests within the vertical slot through breech bolt 10 (The vertical slot is labeled as locking toggle passage 14 in
Those skilled in the art will recall that the rearward travel of the bolt assembly also cocks the hammer and engages the sear to hold the hammer in the cocked position. Depending on the state of other user controls, a magazine latch may be actuated in this position to dispense another shell from the tubular magazine and prepare it for loading into the firing chamber. The operation of the magazine latches and a shell carrier configured to raise a dispensed shell for loading is beyond the scope of this disclosure. However, the reader wishing to further understand these mechanisms is referred to U.S. Pat. No. 2,645,873.
The state shown in
If a conventional round is resting in the firing chamber at the position shown in
In this state the firing pin is free to move forward when struck by the hammer. The reader should note how ring protrusion 22 extends well forward of the bolt face and into the firing chamber. The position shown in
Now understanding the basic operating principles of the invention, the reader may wish to know some additional details regarding the shape of the ring protrusion and ring recess. Those skilled in the art will know that manufacturing tolerances for centerfire cartridges are established by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (“SAAMI”). Tolerances for shotgun shells are fairly loose in comparison to centerfire rifle cartridges. For example, the rim thickness of a 12 gauge shell can vary between 0.0576 and 0.0716 inches (1.463 and 1.819 mm) and still fell within the specification. Head diameter tolerances are supposed to lie between 0.800 and 0.809 inches (20.320 and 20.549 mm) but in practical experience the head diameter may be as small as 0.785 inches (19.939 mm). Variations in hull diameter are even more extreme. Most shells also taper somewhat when proceeding from the base toward the extreme end of the hull.
These variations mean that a shotgun shell may lie somewhat off the center of the firing chamber (owing to head diameter tolerances). Further, it is not uncommon for a shotgun shell to be somewhat “tipped” when it is loaded in the chamber—meaning that the centerline of the shell is angularly displaced from the centerline of the chamber. A shell with a tapered hull will inevitably be somewhat tipped. Thus, it is not always easy to ensure that the inventive ring protrusion on the bolt face slips into the ring recess on the base of a modified cartridge.
Although the angled walls for both the ring protrusion and the ring recess are shown as being symmetric about the centerline, this need not always be the case. As an example, the angle between the centerline and the upper angled walls in the view might be 20 degrees and the angle between the centerline and the lower angled walls might be between 0 and 10 degrees. These relationships may also be reversed, with the upper angle being between 0 and 10 degrees.
Further, the angles used in the ring protrusion need not perfectly match those used in the ring recess. Some manufacturing tolerances will always be present. As long as the interface between the protrusion and the recess allows the bolt to fully close, the variations are acceptable.
The two angled walls 76 shown in
The base of the ring protrusion is of course its widest point. At that widest point the ring protrusion may be said to have an inner diameter and an outer diameter. The inner diameter corresponds to the circular intersection between the ring protrusion and the bolt face that is closest to the firing pin aperture. The outer diameter corresponds to the circular intersection between the ring protrusion and the bolt face that is farthest from the firing pin aperture. The inner diameter is preferably made large enough so that no portion of the ring protrusion makes contact with the primer of the centerfire cartridge. The outer diameter is preferably made small enough so that no portion of the ring protrusion makes contact with the extractor claw.
In the orientation of
The ring protrusion and ring recess can each be manufactured using a wide variety of techniques. The ring protrusion can be manufactured as an integral part of the bolt—such as by machining away a portion of the bolt face other than the ring. The ring protrusion may also be made as a separate piece that is added to the bolt.
On the other hand, the ring protrusion itself must engage the ring recess in a modified cartridge and the tip of the ring protrusion will be subjected to cyclic wear. The ring protrusion could be made of a harder material to reduce wear. As an example, the ring protrusion could be made of tempered tool steel.
The inventive bolt will prevent the use of traditional “go/no-go” gauges. As those skilled in the art will know, proper head spacing of a firearm is often verified using a set of gauges. The term “head space” means the distance between the bolt face and the surface of the firing chamber that determines the longitudinal position of a cartridge. For a shotgun shell, headspace is the distance from, the bolt face to the forward shoulder of the rim recess. A “go” gauge is an inert (generally metal) object having the precise shape of the cartridge case being tested. It represents the maximum allowable headspace. A properly head-spaced firearm should just be able to close on the “go” gauge.
A “no-go” gauge also has the precise shape of the cartridge being tested, but it is made slightly too long in the headspace dimension. A properly head-spaced firearm should not be able to close on the “no-go” gauge.
Gun makers, armorers, and gunsmiths routinely use “go/no-go” gauges in the maintenance and construction of firearms. If the breech bolt is modified with a ring protrusion (as in the preferred embodiments), the bolt will not be able to close on either the “go” or the “no-go” gauges. This is true because the gauges have a flat base and do not include a ring recess. It may therefore be desirable to provide a set of modified gauges that include the ring recess.
The reader will thereby understand that the present invention presents an inventive firearm that can only fire a modified cartridge. The modified cartridge can obviously be fired by the inventive firearm. The modified cartridge can also be fired by a prior art conventional firearm.
The preferred embodiments include a ring protrusion on the bolt face and a ring recess in the cartridge base as described and illustrated. Many other embodiments are possible. As a first example, one could provide the ring protrusion on the base of the cartridge and provide the ring recess in the bolt face. The operation of this alternate embodiment would be similar to the embodiments described previously.
The general concept of the invention is to provide a first geometric feature on the breech bolt and a corresponding second geometric feature on the modified cartridge. These two features engage in order to allow the inventive bolt to close on a modified cartridge (but not on an unmodified cartridge). The geometric features may assume many different forms. The term “modified cartridge” should be understood broadly to encompass a cartridge including an additional geometric feature configured to engage a corresponding geometric feature on an inventive breech bolt.
The cartridge base in all the illustrated embodiments retains a substantial area that is flat and undeformed. As an example, even the embodiment of
The preceding description contains significant detail regarding the novel aspects of the present invention. It should not be construed, however, as limiting the scope of the invention but rather as providing illustrations of the preferred embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined by reference to the claims ultimately presented rather that the examples given.
Pursuant to the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(c), this non-provisional patent application claims the benefit of a previously filed provisional application. The provisional application was filed on Jul. 12, 2016 and assigned application Ser. No. 62/361,011. The provisional application named the same inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2321737 | Engel | Dec 1899 | A |
976459 | Hartmann | Nov 1910 | A |
3120186 | Harvey et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
3217441 | William et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3237335 | William et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3501858 | Hensley | Mar 1970 | A |
4442777 | Greene | Apr 1984 | A |
4478128 | Black | Oct 1984 | A |
5880397 | Crilly | Mar 1999 | A |
6612063 | Sigg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625916 | Dionne | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7021219 | Dindl | Apr 2006 | B1 |
8430035 | Ducastel, Jr. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8484876 | Mossberg | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8782938 | Teach, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9217626 | Hajjar | Oct 2015 | B1 |
20030145754 | Saxby | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040231549 | LaMaster | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20110203151 | Mossberg | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120324774 | Zedrosser | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130255126 | Saxby | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150101228 | Giannini et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1578388 | Mar 1971 | DE |
Entry |
---|
PCT Written Opinion for PCT/US17/41662, dated Jan. 15, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180017348 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62361011 | Jul 2016 | US |