Discharging a firearm causes gases to be produced through rapid, confined burning of a propellant that accelerates a projectile. This typically generates a loud noise, a muzzle flash of light, and sometimes visible gas discharge. Often, it is desirable to reduce the amount of noise and light produced by discharging a firearm. For example, military snipers or special operations forces personnel may require stealth to successfully complete missions. Suppressors, or silencers, are typically connected to the muzzle end of a firearm to temporarily capture gas that exits the muzzle. Some suppressor designs divert a portion of the discharge gas to a secondary chamber, such that the gas does not exit the suppressor by the same path as the projectile. The gas is released from the suppressor at a significantly reduced pressure. In general, the more gas a suppressor captures or redirects, the quieter the discharge sound of the firearm. Flash hiders operate in much the same way upon discharge of the firearm, dispersing ignited media thereby diffusing flash.
The presence of a suppressor and/or flash hider, however, may increase the back pressure of the gas in the barrel of the firearm. Increased back pressure in the barrel can influence the firearm's operation. For example, some firearms are gas-operated and use discharge gas pressure in the barrel to reload the firearm. Thus, increasing gas back pressure in the barrel can increase forces acting on the reloading components and affect their operation. Higher forces can also reduce the service life of the reloading components. For at least these reasons, accurately and predictably controlling the pressure attributes of firearm suppressors and flash hiders remains an active field of endeavor.
Thus, there is a need for a firearm discharge gas flow control device that consistently and uniformly distributes gases generated during discharge of the weapon throughout the body of the suppressor.
Accordingly, a firearm discharge gas flow control device and associated methods are provided. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a firearm discharge gas flow control module is provided that can be fluidly coupleable to a muzzle end of a firearm to allow a projectile to pass therethrough. The gas flow control module can include an inlet port, operable to receive at least a portion of a discharge gas generated by firing the projectile, and a gas chamber, bounded by at least one wall that at least partially defines a geometry of the gas chamber. The gas chamber can extend both radially and longitudinally from the inlet port and can translate circumferentially as the gas chamber extends longitudinally. The gas chamber can terminate at a circumferential angle of rotation from the inlet port: the circumferential angle of rotation can be less than 180 degrees.
Additionally, a firearms suppressor operable to be fluidly coupled to a muzzle end of a firearm can be provided. The suppressor can include a plurality of discharge gas flow control modules arranged in a longitudinal stack. Each of the modules can include at least two gas chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. Each gas chamber can be operable to receive a different portion of a discharge gas generated by firing the projectile. Each of the gas chambers can extend both radially and longitudinally from a bore of the suppressor and each of the gas chambers can translate circumferentially as it extends longitudinally.
In addition, a firearms flash hider operable to be fluidly coupled to a suppressor as well as operable to be fluidly coupled to a muzzle end of a firearm can be provided. The flash hider can be one continuous component designed to include a plurality of discharge flash control modules arranged longitudinally. Each of the modules can include at least two flash chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. Each flash chamber can be operable to receive a different portion of a discharge flash generated by ignition upon firing the projectile. Each of the flash chambers can extend both radially and longitudinally from a bore of the flash hider and each of the flash chambers can translate circumferentially as it extends longitudinally.
In one aspect of the invention, a method of controlling gas flow discharged from a firearm is provided. The method can include arranging one or more gas flow control modules on the end of a muzzle of a firearm, with each of the one or more modules including at least two gas chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. The firearm can be discharged to fire a projectile, thereby generating discharge gas, a portion of which is thereby routed through the gas chambers of the modules.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of controlling flash generated by ignition upon firearm discharge is provided. The method can include arranging one or more flash control modules on the end of a suppressor or muzzle of a firearm, with each of the one or more modules including at least two flash chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. The firearm can be discharged to fire a projectile, thereby causing ignition and generating flash, a portion of which is thereby routed through the flash chambers of the modules.
These figures are provided merely for convenience in describing specific embodiments of the invention. Alteration in dimension, materials, and the like, including substitution, elimination, or addition of components can also be made consistent with the following description and associated claims. Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.
Reference will now be made to certain examples, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. Examples discussed herein set forth a firearm discharge gas flow control device and associated methods that can modify flow of the gas discharged by firing a projectile from a firearm.
With the general embodiments set forth above, it is noted that when describing the firearm discharge gas flow control device, or the related method, each of these descriptions are considered applicable to the other, whether or not they are explicitly discussed in the context of that embodiment. For example, in discussing the various modules taught herein, the system and/or method embodiments are also included in such discussions, and vice versa.
Furthermore, various modifications and combinations can be derived from the present disclosure and illustrations, and as such, the following figures should not be considered limiting. It is noted that reference numerals in various figures will be shown in some cases that are not specifically discussed in that particular figure. Thus, discussion of any specific reference numeral in a given figure is applicable to the same reference numeral of related figures shown herein.
It is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a gas chamber” can include one or more of such gas chambers.
Also, it is noted that various modifications and combinations can be derived from the present disclosure and illustrations, and as such, the following figures should not be considered limiting.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.
Any steps recited in any method or process claims may be executed in any order and are not limited to the order presented in the claims unless otherwise stated. Means-plus-function or step-plus-function limitations will only be employed where for a specific claim limitation all of the following conditions are present in that limitation: a) “means for” or “step for” is expressly recited; and b) a corresponding function is expressly recited. The structure, material or acts that support the means-plus function are expressly recited in the description herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined solely by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the descriptions and examples given herein.
As used herein the term “suppressor” can include any device that reduces the amount of noise and muzzle flash generated by firing a firearm.
As used herein the term “flash hider” can include any device that reduces the muzzle flash generated by firing a firearm.
Reference is made herein to the term “gas,” often in connection with a discharge gas produce by discharging a firearm. It is to be understood that such reference includes not only the pure gas produced by such event, but can also include particulates and vapor carried by the gas. Thus, while the present components capture, redirect, suppress, etc., the gas produced by discharging a firearm, they can also be effectively utilized to manage the particulates and related components produced by such an event.
While neither a firearm nor a projectile is illustrated herein, the use of generalized suppression components with such devices is well known in the art. One of ordinary skill in the art, having possession of this disclosure, would readily understand how the present gas control systems are used with firearms and projectiles. Attachment of the present modules to the muzzle end of a firearm will also be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure. For example, a stack of gas control modules 10, 10a, 10b, etc., is shown arranged within an outer cover 18 in
Turning now to
When the gas flow control module 10 is utilized at the muzzle end of a firearm, gas is diverted away from the bore 16 into gas chambers 12, 14, etc., to suppress the audible, visual and thermal signature of the projectile discharge event. Generally, the chambers can include an inlet port immediately adjacent the bore which allows gas to enter the chambers as the projectile passes through the bore. Inlet ports are shown by example at 17 and 20 in
Each gas chamber is bounded by at least one wall that at least partially defines a geometry of the gas chamber. In the example provided in
This arrangement allows the gas chambers to transition discharge gas from a very high pressure level (at the bore, and thus the inlet port area) to lower pressure areas located at terminal ends of the gas chambers. Each chamber can rotate, or “twist,” relative to its respective inlet port some predetermined amount. As shown in
Generally, each module will include two or more gas chambers oriented within the same longitudinal space. That is, the two or more gas chambers are oriented circumferentially offset from one another, such that two or more chambers complete a 360 degree arrangement about the bore. Thus, in one embodiment, each gas chamber terminates at a circumferential angle of rotation “13” from the inlet port that is less than 180 degrees. This can be the case, for example, when only two chambers are utilized, as each will consume a circumferential space that is less than half the total circumferential space. In the example shown in
As will be appreciated, while the number of chambers utilized in one module can vary, each module is still limited to a fixed longitudinal space (or length). Thus, the gas chambers of each module may be “stacked” circumferentially, but the module itself need not be increased in length if the number of chambers is increased. While the number of chambers can be varied, the number is typically at least two, and can be as many as ten (with two pairs of five chambers). Larger numbers of chambers are typically possible with suppressors used on larger caliber firearms, as such an increase in scale allows complex machining of the various inlet ports, chambers, walls, etc., necessary to form the module.
By arranging the gas chambers adjacent one another circumferentially, the forces applied to the muzzle (and thus the firearm generally) due to the back pressure created by the chambers can be better balanced, as the forces are distributed circumferentially about the bore. In addition, the total amount of discharge gas that enters any one module can be transitioned more quickly from a high pressure area (at the bore or inlet port) to the low pressure area (at the terminal portions of the chambers). If only one inlet port were used, for instance, the high pressure gas at that inlet port is restricted, or “choked,” by the limited inlet port opening. By increasing the number of inlet ports, and the number of gas chambers extending therefrom, the discharge gas can be more quickly and more efficiently controlled. The present technology thus radially distributes the high pressures generated by the discharge of a projectile in a highly efficient manner. In addition, as numerous modules can be stacked longitudinally, the longitudinal efficiency of the overall system is greatly improved. Thus, the present system performs better than prior art systems, which include very high pressures near the muzzle of the gun, and lower pressures near the outlet of the suppressor. The present system more effectively distributes pressures radially outward from the bore, and longitudinally outward from the muzzle exit.
While any one gas control module can include a variety of gas chambers oriented in a variety of manners, in one aspect of the invention the gas control modules are stacked (or positioned end-to-end) relative to one another. This relationship is shown by example in
It will be appreciated from
It will be appreciated, however, that chambers 12a and 12b, shown in
As discussed above, the various walls utilized in the modules can translate circumferentially as they extend longitudinally to form an angle of extension relative to a longitudinal axis of the module. This is shown schematically in
As referenced above,
In the example shown, modules 10 can be substantially identical and can be stacked as discussed above, and module 11 can be configured as a flash hider module. Module 10a can be configured slightly differently, as it is stacked, or paired, with another module 10 on only one side. This module 10a can include attachment structure (not shown) that allows the module to be coupled to the outer cover 18, or to the muzzle of a firearm. Module 10b can include similar attachment structure (not shown), and can also include structure that allows it to be attached to any one of flash hider modules 11 (
Flash hider modules can each have a flash chamber design similar to the design previously described for discharge gas flow control modules. Each flash chamber is bounded by at least one wall that at least partially defines a geometry of the flash chamber. The flash chamber can extend both radially and longitudinally from the inlet port and translates circumferentially as the flash chamber extends longitudinally. In other words, a flash can enter the flash chamber through the inlet port, and expand radially outwardly from that point, as well as longitudinally from that point. The flash chamber also forces the ignited media to expand circumferentially as the flash expands longitudinally. Thus, the chamber geometry can be viewed as a “cork-screw” geometry, in which the chamber extends from the inlet port and turns circumferentially as it extends longitudinally and radially.
The boreline can be sized to accommodate any suitable caliber projectile. Non-limiting examples of such projectiles can include 0.22LR, 5.56 mm (0.223), 7.62 mm, 9 mm, 13 mm, 7.8 mm (0.308), 10.6 mm (0.416), and 12.7 mm (0.50), although projectiles from 4 mm through 40 mm outside diameter can be readily used.
It will be appreciated that the modularity of the present technology can be advantageous in a number of manners. As the components can be relatively easily dissembled and assembled, cleaning of the system as a whole can be accomplished relatively easily and quickly. In addition, should one or more components fail, or become damaged, such a component can be easily replaced with a new component.
It is also contemplated that the various modules discussed above can be included in a firearm system. For example, in accordance with the present disclosure, a firearm system can comprise a firearm and a firearm discharge gas flow and flash control device in accordance with the embodiments already discussed.
The gas flow control modules and flash hider can be formed of a material of sufficient strength to withstand the energy created by the discharge of the firearm. Non-limiting examples of suitable materials include titanium, high impact polymers, stainless steels, aluminum, molybdenum, refractory metals, super alloys, aircraft alloys, carbon steels, composites thereof, and the like. One or more of the individual components, or portions of the components, can further include optional coatings such as, but not limited to, diamond coatings, diamond-like carbon coatings, molybdenum, tungsten, tantalum, and the like can also be used. These components can be molded, machined, deposited or formed in any suitable manner. Currently, machining of the various modules can be particularly desirable but is not required.
In a related example, and to reiterate to some degree, a method of controlling gas flow and flash discharged from a firearm can be provided. The method can include arranging one or more gas flow control modules and a flash hider on the end of a muzzle of a firearm. Each of the one or more gas flow control modules can include at least two gas chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. Additionally, the flash hider can include at least one and in some cases at least two flash chambers arranged in a circumferentially offset orientation. The firearm can be discharged to fire a projectile, thereby generating discharge gas and flash, a portion of which is thereby routed through the gas chambers of the gas flow control modules and the flash chambers of the flash hider.
It is to be understood that the above-referenced embodiments are illustrative of the application for the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention while the present invention has been shown in the drawings and described above in connection with the exemplary embodiment(s) of the invention. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth in the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/892,248, filed Oct. 17, 2013 which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 748157 | Bouton | Dec 1903 | A |
| 822127 | Hufnagel | May 1906 | A |
| 916885 | Maxim | Mar 1909 | A |
| 1341363 | Fiala | May 1920 | A |
| 1427802 | Goodwin | Sep 1922 | A |
| 1462158 | Wildner | Jul 1923 | A |
| 1736319 | Maxim | Nov 1929 | A |
| 1773443 | Wilman | Aug 1930 | A |
| 2514996 | Faust Jr. | Jul 1950 | A |
| 3455203 | Pillersdorf | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3667570 | WerBell, III | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3693750 | Takkunen | Sep 1972 | A |
| 4454798 | Shea et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4482027 | Gould | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4501189 | Brandl et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4510843 | Rabatin | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4530417 | Daniel | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4576083 | Seberger, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4907488 | Seberger | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4974489 | Fishbaugh | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5010676 | Kennedy | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5029512 | Latka | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5036747 | McClain, III | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5078043 | Stephens | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5164535 | Leasure | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5590484 | Mooney et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5661255 | Webb, III | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5679916 | Weichert | Oct 1997 | A |
| D415813 | O'Quinn et al. | Oct 1999 | S |
| 6079311 | O'Quinn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6302009 | O'Quinn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6425310 | Champion | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6575074 | Gaddini | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6796214 | Hausken et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 7000547 | Amick | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7059233 | Amick | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7131228 | Hochstrate et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7207258 | Scanlon | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7237467 | Melton | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7308967 | Hoel | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7325474 | Yoshimura et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7412917 | Vais | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7870815 | Hung | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874238 | Silvers | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8042448 | Sylvester et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8087337 | Cary | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8096222 | Silvers | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| D657012 | Woodell | Apr 2012 | S |
| 8453789 | Honigmann et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8516941 | Oliver | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8695474 | Overbeek Bloem et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| D712997 | Proske | Sep 2014 | S |
| D722670 | Oliver | Feb 2015 | S |
| D723647 | Oliver | Mar 2015 | S |
| 8978818 | Proske | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 20100126334 | Shults et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20120048100 | Davies | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20130168181 | Wirth et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130180150 | Dueck | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140231168 | Dueck et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140262605 | Washburn et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150001002 | Wirth et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 743111 | Nov 1956 | GB |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wikipedia, “Suppressor”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressor, retrieval Jan. 26, 2010, pp. 1-14. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61892248 | Oct 2013 | US |