This application claims priority from German Patent Application No. 10 2008 057 769.3, filed Nov. 17, 2008, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a so-called fuze damping in projectiles, in particular with a built-in firing delay.
In projectiles having a firing device, whose fuze is intended to still be functional during or after the penetration of targets, the problem arises that the oscillations of the projectile initiated by the impact shock can have a negative influence on, or even destroy, the sensitive components of the firing device. The oscillations, which are transmitted to the firing device, are caused on the one hand by the sudden deceleration of the projectile and on the other hand by shock waves or sound waves that are introduced into the projectile.
In previous practice, the fuze components were therefore hardened and/or encapsulated in order, in this way, to reduce the introduction of oscillations to the firing system. However, in the case of extreme target structures, measures such as these are not sufficient, and the functional reliability of the firing system cannot always be guaranteed, since they are not sufficient to compensate for the oscillations (for example, on building targets), which occur in or on the fuze on penetration.
The purpose of the invention is, therefore, to include a device in the projectile that minimizes the introduction of oscillations into the firing device and, nevertheless, guarantees the functional reliability of the fuze itself.
The object of the present invention is achieved by the features of a first embodiment, which pertains to a projectile (1) having a rear part (1a) and a fuze (2), wherein at least one damping element (7) is inserted between a fuze base (5) and the projectile (1) and/or between a fuze shoulder (6) and a possible threaded ring (4) or similar attachment element. Various other embodiments of the invention are specified according to preferred embodiments as follows.
For example, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment is modified so that that the damping element (7) is in the form of a disc, ring or pot. In accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment or the second embodiment are modified so that the damping element (7) is a material with a lower acoustic impedance than the material of the projectile (1). In accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention, the third embodiment is further modified so that the damping element (7) is a plastic, for example PE.
The invention is based on the idea of including, in the projectile, a damping system or a damping device, comprising damping and decoupling elements, in order to dissipate oscillations from the firing device.
Damping devices in projectiles are known per se. For example, DE 698 14 022 T2 (EP 0 928 948 B1) describes a projectile having multiple charges and having a damping section that is compressed in the longitudinal direction when the projectile is subjected to the launch acceleration. A gap between the damping section and a rigid support apparatus disappears, as a result of which the support apparatus comes into direct contact with the contact surfaces.
DE 60 2004 001 496 T2 relates to an anti-bunker munition, in which a submunition and the apparatus for ejection of the submunition are isolated from at least one of the walls of the internal cavity by means of a damping material.
In contrast, the present invention employs a solution that provides damping and mechanical decoupling of the firing device, which is included in a fixed manner in the projectile, as a result of which peaks on impact are dissipated and can no longer have a destructive effect on the mechanical and electronic components. The additionally included damping device therefore reduces the effects of the projectile oscillations by means of additional materials of low density and with high damping characteristics with respect to both sound waves and shock waves. The damping device, in according to the present invention, decouples the firing device from the mostly metallic structural area in the projectile.
The oscillations are preferably dissipated by a plastic, which is favoured as the damping and decoupling material. The load on all the components of the fuze, of the firing device, and of the firing chain, is thereby reduced, thus ensuring operation even against extreme targets. The fuze function (i.e., delayed fuzing after penetration of the target results in delay-function) is now also possible, guaranteeing the functional reliability of this fuze function.
The materials employed by the present invention are preferably determined with the assistance of computer simulations (for example, ABACUS EXPLICIT from the Simulia Company). Different penetration processes of a projectile, on passing through steel plates, armour plates, brick walls, concrete walls and sand bunkers, etc., are simulated in the simulation computer, with the load spectrum for the projectile/system being determined in this case, on the basis of which the material and the geometry of the fuze damping are designed. Alternatively, however, it is also possible to use empirical values to determine the materials.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, discs are inserted in front of and behind the fuze, or the firing device, and these discs are screwed to the firing system with an appropriate torque. A material is selected for the discs so that the optimum damping for the firing system is achieved for all targets with the selected (defined) torque.
The thickness of the discs is, in accordance with the present invention, matched to the load spectra (for example, by simulation), thus allowing optimization of the damping system, in particular, for specific targets.
Since the damping system is composed mainly of a small number of discs, preferably of plastic, the solution provided by the present invention is also highly cost effective. Existing firing systems can be modified without major effort.
Virtually complete packaging of the fuze with the material that absorbs the damping is also possible and technically feasible, in accordance with the present invention.
The invention will be explained in more detail using one exemplary embodiment and with reference to the attached drawing, which illustrates a projectile in accordance with the present invention.
In the drawing, the single FIGURE shows a projectile 1 with a rear part 1a in which a firing system is located comprising a fuze 2 and a firing booster 3 (if provided in the embodiment design). The firing system is held in the projectile 1 by, for example, a threaded ring 4 or an attachment element of some similar type.
At least one damping element 7 is inserted between a fuze base 5 and the projectile 1 and/or between a fuze shoulder 6 and the threaded ring 4. The damping element 7, which is in the form of a disc or ring (or else is U-shaped), is preferably composed of plastic (for example, polyethylene=PE) or of a material with a lower acoustic impedance than the material of the projectile 1. The threaded ring 4 is preferably tightened with a defined torque. In consequence, the damping surfaces of the material of the damping element 7 rest completely on the firing system and no gaps are created. At the same time, it is used to fix the firing system and for its attachment in the projectile 1.
The arrow in the FIGURE indicates the firing direction. When the projectile 1 strikes a target, which is not illustrated in any more detail, the resultant oscillations are absorbed by the damping element or elements 7. The projectile 1 is itself fired with a firing delay, only after the projectile 1 has penetrated through the target, with the residual forces being sufficient to initiate the fuze.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 057 769 | Nov 2008 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3919941 | Breed et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4014264 | Bendler et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4078497 | Castelli | Mar 1978 | A |
4690057 | Carlsson | Sep 1987 | A |
4911058 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
7430963 | Hennings et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7549374 | Schwantes et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552682 | Schwantes et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7802518 | Schwantes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814834 | Schwantes et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20060016360 | Eches et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070051268 | Bissig | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080148984 | Schwantes et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148985 | Schwantes et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090211481 | Schwantes et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
698 14 022 | Apr 2004 | DE |
60 2004 001 496 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0 928 948 | May 2003 | EP |
1 521 053 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2 050 235 | Apr 1971 | FR |
2 006 397 | May 1979 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100147178 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |