This application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2013/051031, filed Dec. 18, 2013, which claims the benefit of and priority to Israeli Application No. 223982, filed Dec. 27, 2012, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The invention, the subject matter of this patent application, is found in the field of apparatus that serve for prevention and stoppage of unintentional (unwanted) firing as it might occur from automatic weapons (for example—a machine gun) that is remotely operated, wherein it is installed in a Remotely Controlled Weapon Station—herein after RCWS.
RCWS is a weapon (weaponry) station or post that is mostly mounted on military vehicles or armored combat vehicles and is controlled from within the vehicle by means of a joystick, video display and operating console. The RCWS comprises all the functions which enable it to acquire targets, aim the weapon and fire at a target with high accuracy. The gunner operates while he is within the vehicle and is protected by the vehicle's armor.
A typical weapon that is mounted in an RCWS is a machine gun (for example—Medium machine gun M-240g or an FN MAG58), that is fed by concatenated munitions (“belted”) in the sense of a belt or of a metallic link chain and includes an ejection port through which the empty cartridges (bullet casings or cartridge cases) are ejected in the course of the firing progress.
In all the machine guns that we cited above, use was made of the pressure that was generated by initiating the bullets cartridges for reloading and re-cocking the machine gun (the well known principle of Maxim's gun). The machine guns can include various mechanisms for restraining the created force—recoil systems, blowback system and gas mechanisms. What is common to all of them is the development of a cyclic linear movement of a component of the machine gun forward and backward along the firing axis, as long as firing occurs (initiated or uncontrollable) from the machine gun). In a machine gun with a recoil system the moving component is the breech bolt, in a machine gun with a blowback system the moving component is the sliding block, and in a machine gun with a gas mechanism the moving component is the ‘bolt’. Herein after all the moving components cited above will be dubbed ‘breech block’. Posting a block (jam) and generating a mechanical obstruction in the path of the breech block movement prevents the possibility of firing from the machine gun, and in case of existence of firing—causes an immediate stoppage of the firing from the machine gun. An additional characteristic is the fact that a leading front edge of the breech block is exposed during its cyclic movement step over the ejection port of the cartridge cases.
Machine guns of the discussed type might suffer from a phenomenon of occurrence of continued runaway fire (spontaneous firing) also after releasing the machine gun's trigger (a phenomenon known also by its nicknames “unruly weapon” (also: “going wild weapon”).
From the instant of mounting machine guns of the type discussed in the RCWS then the firing action (pressing the trigger) is executed by remote activation of a means that in fact imitates the operation done manually (pressing the trigger by the operator's hand/finger). For example—remote actuation by issuing an electrically command on an electro-mechanical means of—for example, the solenoids type. Under those circumstances, a scenario of continued spontaneous firing might lead to very serious results because of the far away location of the operating soldier (for example—inside within the armored vehicle on top of which the RCWS is mounted).
Not only the above, but also the following—exchanging the fighter's pressing finger—of a soldier that has self judgment and discretion, by an electro-mechanical actuator that exists as said at the contact point—namely at the pressing and releasing point of the trigger of the machine gun installed in the RCWS, also naturally adds an assembly that is susceptible for a technical failure, to the control chain over the machine gun's operation (an electro-mechanical actuator).
Thus, for machine guns that are remotely operated from the RCWS proper, there is required an apparatus, one or more, for early prevention and stoppage of not-intended (unwanted) firing, namely stoppage of runaway fire. An apparatus that would be also remotely operable in and of itself.
A publication of patent application IL 176038 by the applicant of this present (current) patent application, describes an electrically actuated apparatus for preventing unintentional firing. There, the subject presented is an electro-mechanical apparatus for remote operation of an integral safety catch of a machine gun. Naturally it is not talked there about an apparatus that prevents or stops runaway fire even after releasing the trigger of the machine gun.
A publication of patent application US 2011/0296978 by the applicant of this current patent application, describes a firing mechanism security apparatus for remotely controlled automatic machine guns. The subject discussed there is an apparatus such as that when an indication from two sensors, that point the existence of firing taking place without any given command to press the trigger, executes a mechanical intervention by posting an obstruction on the cartridges chain (for stopping the feeding of the machine gun), or alternatively—in a way of posting an obstruction to ejecting the empty cartridges from the ejection port (and hence generating a jam as a result). In addition, the publication describes also an option of automatic shifting of the faulty (out of order) machine gun and training (directing) it unto a safer elevation angle.
It has been found that there exists a need to add an apparatus that will prevent unintentional firing in advance and not only lead to stoppage of such unintentional firing from the instance of receiving the indications as said, about the fact that such firing actually exists.
This and more, as a backup and as an addition to the apparatus described there (in US 2011/0296978) or as an substitute to it, there exists a need that the stoppage of the firing would not be dependent on obstructing the path of the cartridges chain toward the machine gun (as indeed the cartridges belt might be torn in a manner that part of it would continue to feed the machine gun as it is pulled by it), or requires waiting to the actual formation of a stoppage (in the time interval that passes between obstructing the ejection port until the jam actually occurs).
In addition, from the instant of activating the apparatus of the type described there (in US 2011/0296978), then restoring the machine gun to normal operation condition, enforces a relatively long exposure of a soldier that is required to exit—for example, from the safety of the relative protection of the space of the armored vehicle (on which the RCWS is mounted) for installing anew the cartridges belt or clearing the jam that was made, a relatively long time consuming task, hence dangerous.
Thus, at the time that preceded the invention, the subject matter of this current patent application, a need was recognized for—at least, an additional apparatus, reliable and low priced, both for preventing of runaway fire as well as for stoppage of runaway fire at its nascent beginning as it is occurring at a machine gun that is remotely operated while mounted on an RCWS and that from the instant of its actuating would quickly and efficiently stop the firing from the machine gun, and in a manner that would enable proper renewed operation of the machine gun while not requiring extended exposure of the soldier.
The current invention, the subject matter of this patent application, responds to the need expressed above by providing an apparatus that from the instant of activating it, posts a mechanical interruption (a barrier) to the breech block (as defined previously above) of the machine gun, and prevents in advance or stops the cyclic linear movement forward and backward of the breech block which is required, as said, for executing automatic firing by the machine gun.
The barrier (jamming) component in an apparatus in accordance with the invention is inserted through the ejection port of the cartridges and makes a place for itself before the front leading edge of the breech block.
In one aspect, the invention is an apparatus that prevents and stops runaway firing—that is installable in the RCWS. An apparatus that comprises a barrier (jamming) component and an actuator that is connected to said barrier component. The barrier component is suited for movement by the actuator through the cartridges ejection port from automatic weapons that are mountable in an RCWS, to the weapon's breech block movement path, in order to prevent in advance or stop runaway firing from it, and outwards from it in a manner that enables firing.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the actuator is an electrical actuator that is activated to propel the barrier component outwards (away) from the breech block movement path, while in the regular (normal) situation the barrier component is spring biased toward the breech block movement path.
By the point of view of a second aspect, in the invention there is embodied a general method for preventing and stopping runaway firing of automatic weapons that are mountable in an RCWS and comprises a breech block and a cartridges ejection port. A method that comprises the steps of interrupting the movement of the breech block of the weapon by propelling a barrier component to move through the cartridges ejection port to the movement path of the breech block of the weapon for preventing in advance (before it starts) or stopping runaway firing of the weapon. At the second step the barrier component is propelled to movement through the cartridges ejection port outwards (away) from the movement path of the breech block in a manner that firing by the weapon is enabled.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanations of the invention as claimed.
Examples illustrative of embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to figures attached hereto. In the figures, identical structures, elements or parts that appear in more than one figure are generally labeled with the same numeral in all the figures in which they appear. Dimensions of components and features shown in the figures are generally chosen for convenience and clarity of presentation and are not necessarily shown to scale.
Reference is made to
Preventing and stopping runaway firing apparatus 30 comprises a barrier (jamming) component 40 and electrical actuator 50 that is connected to barrier component 40. Thus, the discussed subject is an electro mechanical mechanism that includes an electrical actuator unto which a rigid arm is connected. This is a compact mechanism in its dimensions (see
In accordance with the invention, barrier component 40 is suited to move through cartridges ejection port (opening) 22 of machine gun 20, unto the movement path of breech block 24 of machine gun 20 for preventing in advance of runaway firing from it or stoppage of such firing when its just beginning (see
The transition from the state of non-fire position—see there, (
Reference is made to
Apparatus 30 comprises, as said, a barrier component 40 and an electrical actuator 50 that is connected to barrier component 40. Barrier component 40 is made of a rigid material (for example from steel, by machining) in a configuration resembling the letter U shape. Linking barrier component 40 to electrical actuator 50 is performed by a rotation axis assembly 60. One end of barrier component 40 is suited to connect to rotation axis assembly 60 whereas the other end of barrier component 40 is suited for passage through the cartridges ejection port opening 22 (see
Electrical actuator 50 performs a rotational motion along an angular sector in a manner that the motion of barrier component 40 through cartridges ejection port 22 constitutes a rotational motion. Electrical actuator 50 that performs a rotational motion as said, might be, for example, a rotary solenoid manufactured by Shindengen Electric Co. model M700-21-178R or any equivalent rotary solenoid of similar properties and parameters that produces rotational motion along an angular sector.
Torsion spring component 70 that is connected to rotation axis assembly 60, in its regular state, biases barrier component 40 unto a rotational motion towards the movement path of the breech block of the weapon (see
Any professional would understand that propelling the barrier component in an apparatus in accordance with the invention into a motion that is rather rotary in its direction, as it is happening at apparatus 30, constitutes only one possibility, and in an apparatus in accordance with the invention the barrier component can be propelled into a motion that is rather linear in its direction (to differentiate it from the rotary one as described above when referring to the accompanying drawings).
Any professional would also understand that apparatus 30 includes in addition also components that serve for packaging the apparatus components as they were described above into one and unified assembly and for anchoring the apparatus in the RCWS (see for example house component 80, front cover 82 and anchoring bracket 84).
Thus, any professional would appreciate the fact that in view of the regular state of apparatus 30 (spring 70 biasing barrier component 40 inwards, while electrical actuator 50 is idle), then—if the breech block of the weapon is found in its rear state but is released and—for any reason executes a non intended movement to the firing state (forward movement), the barrier component will stop the breech block and prevent in advance runaway firing. If it so happens that non intended firing is in progress (the weapon fires continuously) then barrier component 40 would automatically integrate for stopping the breech block movement (the leading front edge of the breech block would collide with barrier component 40 that would be pushed persistently and continuously by the power of return spring 70 and integrate by protrudes to its path), and thus perform immediate stoppage of the nascent unintended firing.
Reference is made to
Any professional would understand that means 90 for manual extraction of barrier component 40, away (outwards) from the movement path of the breech block of the weapon is liable to include a return spring component positioned around rotation axis 96, in a manner that from the instant of releasing the handle, barrier component 40 would return and be biased unto the movement path of the breech block (by the power of return spring component 70), (see
Thus, as we pointed at above, transition from the non-fire state (
Any professional would also understand that the invention can be implemented without an electrical actuator at all but with solely a manual actuator that would enable taking out the barrier component and extracting it from the movement path of the breech block of the weapon.
But, as usual, propelling the barrier component outwards and extracting it from the cartridges ejection port in a manner that enables firing (fire state) can be executed by electrical initiation of the electrical actuator, and this when a firing command is given, that can be the same command proper that causes also electrical initiating of the actuator of the weapon's trigger. In other words—the transition from the non-fire state (
Any professional would also understand that for controlling an apparatus in accordance with the invention it is possible to integrate an array of sensors as described in patent application publication US 2011/0296978 that we pointed at above. When an indication from two sensors is given, that indicates (points at) the existence of actual firing without a given firing command of pressing on the trigger, automatic cut off of the power supply to the electrical actuator of an apparatus in accordance with the invention would be executed and the barrier component would be automatically biased to move toward the movement path of the breech block component of the weapon and bring about stoppage of the firing from it (in addition and similarly to what is described in the cited document, it is also possible to execute automatic diversion of the faulty weapon and training it to a safer and higher elevation angle).
In light of what was described above while referring to the accompanying drawings, any professional would appreciate the fact that in the manner of operation of apparatus 30, there is also embedded a general method for preventing and stopping runaway firing from automatic weapons that are mountable on an RCWS and includes a breech block and an opening for ejection of cartridges (cartridges ejection port). A method that comprises the step of interrupting the movement of the breech block of the weapon by propelling a barrier component to move through the cartridges ejection port to the movement path of the breech block of the weapon for preventing in advance (before it starts) or stopping runaway firing of the weapon (non-fire state).
At the second step, when it is wanted to transit from the non fire state to the fire state, the barrier component is propelled to movement through the cartridges ejection port outwards (away) from the movement path of the breech block in a manner that firing by the weapon is enabled.
In a preferred embodiment of the method, the propelling of the barrier component is characterized by that it is a rotational movement taking place along an angular sector.
Thus, the invention enables both prevention in advance of non intended firing (as long as the breech block is found in its rear position (state) and integration with the barrier component was enabled), and also stoppage of nascent un-wanted firing if it exists (through the regular biased state of the barrier component—to integrate into the movement path of the breech block).
The invention was described above while referring to a medium machine gun of the medium machine gun M-240g type or an FN MAG 58 type, but any professional would understand that what is treated is an apparatus that is suitable to be implemented in all automatic weapons that have an opening that enables access and passage through it unto the path of the cyclic movement—forward and backward, of the breech block of that weapon.
It is also to be noted that an RCWS in which an apparatus in accordance with the invention is mounted or on which an apparatus is implemented the prevention and the stoppage method of unintended firing in accordance with the invention, can be installed on marine propelled platforms as well as on static (military) posts and not only on armored vehicles as described above (in length—solely as an example). This and more, any professional would also understand that an apparatus in accordance with the invention is suitable for other implementations also in devices of automatic weapons as said, that are not necessarily RCWS's but in which electrical firing is implemented (for example—a machine gun mounting in a tank).
While the above description contains many specifications, the professional reader should not construe these as limitations on the scope of the firing preventing and stoppage apparatus which is the subject matter of the invention, but rather examples of embodiments thereof. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art of designing and manufacturing RCWS units, various modification and variations can be made in the firing preventing and stoppage apparatus of the present invention without departing from the spirit or the scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations that come under the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
223982 | Dec 2012 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2013/051031 | 12/18/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/102771 | 7/3/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2948192 | Evans | Aug 1960 | A |
3731588 | Curtis | May 1973 | A |
3821920 | Brieger | Jul 1974 | A |
3961555 | Zellmer | Jun 1976 | A |
4699040 | Menges | Oct 1987 | A |
4986162 | Wissing | Jan 1991 | A |
5058482 | Bartolles | Oct 1991 | A |
5127309 | Menges | Jul 1992 | A |
5223649 | Claridge | Jun 1993 | A |
5231243 | Lescure | Jul 1993 | A |
5924232 | Rhoden | Jul 1999 | A |
6694659 | Olsen | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6836989 | Gussalli Beretta | Jan 2005 | B2 |
8042450 | Doll | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8127657 | Gorali | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8448557 | Hamish | May 2013 | B2 |
20100257769 | Doll | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110296978 | Hamish | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120090213 | Pichler | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2403477 | Jul 1975 | DE |
2403477 | Jul 1975 | DE |
3712905 | Nov 1988 | DE |
9301594 | May 1994 | DE |
10215910 | Oct 2003 | DE |
176038 | Jul 2007 | IL |
H07-091890 | Apr 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150330735 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |