1. Field of the Invention
The present invention pertains to the operation of a fuel processor and, more particularly, to the identification of a firstout shutdown condition in a fuel processor.
2. Description of the Related Art
Fuel cell technology is an alternative energy source for more conventional energy sources employing the combustion of fossil fuels. A fuel cell typically produces electricity, water, and heat from a fuel and oxygen. More particularly, fuel cells provide electricity from chemical oxidation-reduction reactions and possess significant advantages over other forms of power generation in terms of cleanliness and efficiency. Typically, fuel cells employ hydrogen as the fuel and oxygen as the oxidizing agent. The power generation is proportional to the consumption rate of the reactants.
A significant disadvantage which inhibits the wider use of fuel cells is the lack of a widespread hydrogen infrastructure. Hydrogen has a relatively low volumetric energy density and is more difficult to store and transport than the hydrocarbon fuels currently used in most power generation systems. One way to overcome this difficulty is the use of “fuel processors” or “reformers” to convert the hydrocarbons to a hydrogen rich gas stream which can be used as a feed for fuel cells. Hydrocarbon-based fuels, such as natural gas, LPG, gasoline, and diesel, require conversion processes to be used as fuel sources for most fuel cells. Current art uses multi-step processes combining an initial conversion process with several clean-up processes. The initial process is most often steam reforming (“SR”), autothermal reforming (“ATR”), catalytic partial oxidation (“CPOX”), or non-catalytic partial oxidation (“POX”). The clean-up processes are usually comprised of a combination of desulfurization, high temperature water-gas shift, low temperature water-gas shift, selective CO oxidation, or selective CO methanation. Alternative processes include hydrogen selective membrane reactors and filters.
Thus, many types of fuels can be used, some of them hybrids with fossil fuels, but the ideal fuel is hydrogen. If the fuel is, for instance, hydrogen, then the combustion is very clean and, as a practical matter, only the water is left after the dissipation and/or consumption of the heat and the consumption of the electricity. Most readily available fuels (e.g., natural gas, propane and gasoline) and even the less common ones (e.g., methanol and ethanol) include hydrogen in their molecular structure. Some fuel cell implementations therefore employ a “fuel processor” that processes a particular fuel to produce a relatively pure hydrogen stream used to fuel the fuel cell.
Fuel processor designs are typically highly involved. Typically, a substantial number of subsystems interact in a complicated manner to produce the hydrogen for the fuel cell. For instance, a fuel processor might mix water, air, and a fuel, and reform the mixture. Thus, the fuel processor may have a separate subsystems directed to delivering the water, air, and fuel to a mixing subsystem to produce the process feed gas. Quantities, pressures, and temperatures of the water, air, fuel, and process feed gas are controlled during the mixing process to achieve a desired composition for the process feed gas and prepare it for reforming. The mixing subsystem then delivers the process feed gas to a reforming subsystem in a controlled manner. The reforming process itself constitutes several smaller processes, each of which may occur at a different temperature and pressure.
Any one of these quantities, pressures, temperatures, etc. may generate an error condition in the operation of the fuel processor for a host of reasons. Some of these error conditions may warrant shutting down the fuel processor until it can be corrected, i.e., a “shutdown.” A fuel processor typically includes a control system that monitors these types of parameters for error conditions and shuts down the fuel processor. Upon shutdown, an operator or a maintenance technician ascertains the cause of the shutdown, corrects the problem, and then the fuel processor is brought back into operation.
The involved design of the fuel processor frequently spawns a difficult problem in this context. A shutdown is usually initiated by a single shutdown error condition. This condition is referred to as the “firstout.” However, the effects of the firstout typically propagate through the fuel processor very quickly, triggering other shutdown error conditions. Consequently, by the time the fuel processor is shut down, there may be very many shutdown error conditions present. The operator or maintenance technician must then wade through all these error to determine which was the firstout in order to correct the problem. The process of the determining which of the shutdown error conditions was the first out can be long and costly.
The present invention is directed to resolving, or at least reducing, at least one of the problems mentioned above.
A method and apparatus for determining which condition in a fuel processor has initiated a shutdown of the fuel processor are disclosed. In general, the apparatus generates a plurality of shutdown initiator signals, each corresponding to one of a plurality of shutdown conditions and indicating whether such condition is present. The shutdown initiator signals are read within a predetermined window. At least one of the read shutdown initiator signals indicates that a corresponding first shutdown condition has occurred and identifies the corresponding first shutdown condition as the firstout. The apparatus includes, in various aspects, a controller implemented in a computing apparatus that is programmed to perform the method and a program storage medium encoded with instructions that, when executed, perform the method.
The invention may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, the drawings illustrate specific embodiments herein described in detail by way of example. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort, even if complex and time-consuming, would be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
Still referring to
One particular implementation 300 of the computing apparatus 105, first shown in
The computing apparatus 300 illustrated in
Returning to
The shutdown initiator signals 402 are scanned every 50 milliseconds, or so. The precise interval between scans is a function of processor speed, and so does not limit the scope of the invention. The 50 millisecond period is a function of the operational frequency of the processor 305 (shown in
If a given shutdown initiator signal 402 is “ON” when scanned, it indicates that the corresponding shutdown condition has occurred and that the system is to be shut down. The firstout functional block 400 identifies the corresponding condition of any shutdown initiator signal that is “ON” during a scan as a firstout condition. Note that, in some circumstances, more than one of the shutdown initiator signals 402 may be “ON” in the same scan. In that case, one of the shutdown initiator signals 402 that is “ON” is identified as the firstout even though multiple firstout conditions may be present. The information regarding the other “ON” shutdown initiator signals 402 is also saved, however, for reporting and analysis. While identifying and reporting multiple firstout conditions may not be as desirable as identifying only a single firstout, it is still preferable to identifying none at all, or even a number as large as thirty. Thus, the invention is not limited to identifying only a single firstout condition. However, as a corollary, it is generally desirable to employ processors with higher operational frequencies that, as a consequence, generate scans more frequently.
Because the effects of the firstout can propagate quickly to generate additional shutdown error conditions, it is possible that two or more shutdown initiator signals 402 may be found to indicate a shutdown error condition in the same scan. This event is indicated when SELECT=1 (i.e., the sum of the shutdown initiator signals 402>1). The functional block 606 reads through the shutdown initiator signals 402 to see which indicates that a shutdown error condition has occurred. The functional block 606 reads the signals in states S2 and S3, and identifies the first shutdown initiator signal 402 indicating the corresponding shutdown error condition has occurred as the “firstout.” The functional block then proceeds through states S5 and S6 to read the remaining shutdown initiator signals 402 indicate that their corresponding shutdown error has also occurred. The information from these shutdown initiator signals 402 is also saved, but they are not marked as the “firstout.” Note that this algorithm will not necessarily detect the true firstout, but it will reduce the number of shutdown error conditions that must be investigated as the firstout.
Returning to
Returning now to
The functionality of the select block 500 is enabled if the firstout functional block 400 is not locked and waiting to be reset. The illustrated embodiment enables this functionality by multiplying a FO_NO_ACTIVE signal received over the line 504. The FO_NO_ACTIVE signal is generated by the activate block 502, which receives as inputs the firstout status of each corresponding condition from the latches 506. If at least one of the shutdown indicator signals 402 is “ON” during the scan, this is propagated by the select block 500 through the latches 506 to the activate block 502, which is then disabled until a reset signal 410, first shown in
The elements of
Thus, at least some aspects of the present invention will typically be implemented as software on an appropriately programmed computing device, e.g., the computing apparatus 300 in
Some portions of the detailed descriptions herein are consequently presented in terms of a software implemented process involving symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory in a computing system or a computing device. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those in the art to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. The process and operation require physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic, or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantifies. Unless specifically stated or otherwise as may be apparent, throughout the present disclosure, these descriptions refer to the action and processes of an electronic device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic, magnetic, or optical) quantities within some electronic device's storage into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the storage, or in transmission or display devices. Exemplary of the terms denoting such a description are, without limitation, the terms processing, “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” “displaying,” and the like.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4673624 | Hockaday | Jun 1987 | A |
5383201 | Satterlee et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5731101 | Sherif et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5827602 | Koch et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6534950 | LeBoe | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6682838 | Stevens | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6759156 | Wheat et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792341 | Hunt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6824577 | Deshpande | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838199 | Balliet et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6838200 | Goebel et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6858336 | Reiser et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887285 | Deshpande | May 2005 | B2 |
6905791 | Busenbender | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913845 | Bekkedahl et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20020083646 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020088740 | Krause et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090326 | Deshpande | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090327 | Deshpande | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090328 | Deshpande | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090334 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094310 | Krause et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098129 | Martin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020155329 | Stevens | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 067 614 | Jan 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040197238 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |