Fischer-Tropsch catalysts

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8969231
  • Patent Number
    8,969,231
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 31, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 3, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method of producing an alumina-supported cobalt catalyst for use in a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reaction, which comprises: calcining an initial γ-alumina support material at a temperature to produce a modified alumina support material; impregnating the modified alumina support material with a source of cobalt; calcining the impregnated support material, activating the catalyst with a reducing gas, steam treating the activated catalyst, and activating the steam treated catalyst with a reducing gas.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a National Phase entry of PCT Application No. PCT/GB2010/001647, filed Aug. 31, 2010, which claims priority from Great Britain Application No. 0915207.5, filed Sep. 1, 2009, which issued as Great Britain Patent No. 2473071 on Sep. 11, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to supported catalysts and their use in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reactions, and more specifically to processes for the production of the supported catalyst, and to the supported catalyst itself, as well as activation of the catalyst.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conversion of natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons (“Gas To Liquids” or “GTL” process) is based on a 3 step procedure consisting of: 1) synthesis gas production; 2) synthesis gas conversion by FT synthesis; and 3) upgrading of FT products (wax and naphtha/distillates) to final products.


The Fischer-Tropsch reaction for conversion of synthesis gas, a mixture of CO and hydrogen, possibly also containing essentially inert components like CO2, nitrogen and methane, is commercially operated over catalysts containing the active metals Fe or Co. Iron catalysts are best suited for synthesis gas with low H2/CO ratios (<1.2), e.g. from coal or other heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, where this ratio is considerably lower than the consumption ratio of the FT-reaction (2.0-2.1).


WO 2005/072866 discloses a method of producing an alumina-supported catalyst, which comprises the following steps: a first impregnation step in which an initial alumina support material is impregnated with a source of a 2-valent metal capable of forming a spinel compound with alumina; a first calcination step in which the impregnated alumina support material is calcined at a temperature of at least 550° C. to produce a modified alumina support material; a second impregnation step in which the modified alumina support material is impregnated with a source of catalytically active metal; and a second calcination step in which the impregnated modified support material is calcined at a temperature of at least 150° C. This is then followed by a reduction step to activate the cobalt.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is concerned with Co-based catalysts, in particular, supported Co-based catalysts. A variety of products can be made by the FT-reaction, but from supported cobalt, the primary product is long-chain hydrocarbons that can be further upgraded to products like diesel fuel and petrochemical naphtha. Byproducts can include olefins and oxygenates.


To achieve sufficient catalytic activity, it is customary to disperse the Co on a catalyst carrier, often referred to as the support material. In this way, a larger portion of Co is exposed as surface atoms where the reaction can take place. Suitable support materials include titania, silica, and alumina and various metal oxides and modified aluminas and mixtures thereof. The modified aluminas include addition of stabilization agents, treatment with silanes and other silicon compounds and various acid or base additions or wash procedures. One way of modifying the alumina is to add a divalent metal compound to the alumina or an alumina precursor followed by high temperature treatment. The high temperature treatment is preferably carried out at 700 to 1300° C., more preferably between 900 and 1250° C. The divalent metal compound includes nickel, zinc and magnesium and other metals capable of forming a spinel with alumina.


Supported cobalt catalysts are the preferred catalysts for the FT synthesis. The most important properties of a cobalt FT catalyst are the activity, the selectivity usually to C5 and heavier products and the resistance towards deactivation. The physical strength and chemical robustness of the catalyst and support are also crucial. Normally, the catalyst is deployed in a slurry type, fluidized bed or fixed-bed reactor when used, but other reactor types like a microstructured reactor has been proposed. In a slurry reactor the average catalyst particle size can be between 20 and 200 μm.


Optionally, a promoter can be added, and rhenium is a well known promoter for cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Other promoters besides rhenium, specifically, platinum, iridium or ruthenium, can be employed. It is also possible to add a second promoter such as lanthanum oxide or a mixture of oxides of the lanthanides or other compounds which are difficult to reduce.


According to one convenient procedure for making the catalyst, after impregnation of the alumina carrier material with a solution of a cobalt compound, it is dried at e.g. 80-120° C. and calcined at a relatively low temperature of 200 to 450° C., e.g. at 300° C., for 2 to 16 hours. The cobalt is then activated by a reduction step, typically by treating the catalyst with a reducing gas at about 200 to 500° C. at pressures from atmospheric to 20 bar. The reducing gas can be hydrogen, preferably dry hydrogen.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a supported cobalt catalyst which shows an improved selectivity for C5+ hydrocarbons in F-T synthesis.


According to the invention, there is provided a method of producing an activated supported cobalt catalyst, which comprises the following steps: a cobalt impregnation step in which a support material is impregnated with a source of cobalt; a calcination step in which the impregnated support material is calcined to produce a supported catalyst material in oxide form; a first activation step in which the supported catalyst material is treated with a reducing gas; a modifying gas treatment step in which the activated supported catalyst is modified with a modifying gas; and a second activation step in which the modified activated supported catalyst material is treated with a reducing gas.


It has been found that a modifying step, after initial activation of the catalyst, followed by a second activation step, results in a catalyst with increased selectivity to C5+ hydrocarbons, without any appreciable detrimental effect on activity.


Before impregnation, the catalyst support may be precalcined at about 500° C. One convenient way of loading active metal and promoter onto the support is by impregnation in one step, but multiple steps can also be employed, from a mixed aqueous solution of appropriate metal salts, generally of cobalt nitrate and perrhenic acid or alternatively ammonium perrhenate. The impregnation technique generally used is the pore filling or “incipient wetness” method, in which the solution is mixed with the dry support until the pores are filled. The definition of the end point of this method may vary somewhat from laboratory to laboratory so that an impregnated catalyst could have a completely dry appearance or a sticky snow-like appearance. However, in no instances would there be any free flowing liquid present when the incipient wetness method is employed.


A number of alternative impregnation procedures are known in the art which use alternative solvents and chemicals, however, in the present invention, the preferred procedure involves aqueous incipient wetness with solutions of cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2.6 H2O) and perrhenic acid (HReO4). Possible alternatives include using cobalt acetate(s), cobalt carbonate(s) cobalt halide(s), cobalt carbonyl(s), cobalt oxalate(s), cobalt phosphate(s), organic cobalt compounds, ammonium perrhenate, rhenium halide(s), rhenium carbonyl(s), industrial metal salt solutions, organic solvents, etc. The solution may also encompass pH regulating agents, complexing agents, surfactants and other compound(s) that in some way influence the impregnation and following steps. e.g. ammonia or urea can be used. Furthermore, the impregnation technique may encompass all available methods besides incipient wetness, such as precipitation, impregnation from slurry with surplus liquid, chemical vapour deposition etc. It is well known that the impregnation method may influence the dispersion of the active metal (cobalt) and hence the catalytic activity.


The impregnated catalyst is dried, typically at 80-120° C., to remove water from the catalyst pores, and then calcined at typically 200-450° C., e.g. at 300° C. for 2-16 h. The method may include the additional step of impregnating or co-impregnating the support material with a promoter. The promoter may comprise platinum or rhenium. Preferably, the promoter is rhenium and the source of rhenium is selected from perrhenic acid (HReO4), ammonium perrhenate, rhenium halide(s) and rhenium carbonyl(s).


Preferably, the initial support material is alumina and more preferably substantially comprises γ-alumina. Preferably, the initial alumina support material has a specific surface area in the range 100 to 400 m2/g, and a pore volume greater than 0.2 cm3/g, preferably greater than 0.4 cm3/g.


Preferably, prior to the cobalt impregnation step, an initial support material is impregnated with a source a of 2-valent metal capable of forming a spinel phase with alumina in a first impregnation step. Preferably, the source of a 2-valent metal comprises a source of cobalt, zinc, magnesium, manganese, nickel or iron. More preferably, the source of a 2-valent metal comprises nickel or zinc in an amount of less then 25 wt % of the final reduced catalyst, for example, less than 20 wt %, alternatively less than 8 wt %.


Preferably, after the 2-valent metal impregnation step, but prior to the cobalt impregnation step, the impregnated initial support material is calcined. Preferably, the first calcination step is carried out at a temperature in the range 700 to 1300° C., more preferably between 900 and 1250° C. Conveniently, after the first calcination step, the modified alumina support has a surface area of 20 to 80 m2/g.


It should be understood that incorporation of the divalent metal with the initial support material can be carried out in different ways, e.g. by intimate mixing prior to forming a suitable shape of the support. As an example, a modified support suitable for making a cobalt catalyst can be prepared by impregnation of γ-alumina particles with nickel nitrate followed by drying and calcination steps, up to a maximum temperature of 1150-1200° C. During this process, nickel aluminate, a spinel compound, will be formed and possible larger or smaller amounts of α-alumina.


Unmodified γ-alumina may also be used as a support.


The method may include the additional step of incorporating a stablizer into the alumina support material, prior to the cobalt impregnation step. Preferably, the stablizer comprises lanthanum. In preparing the support material, organic or inorganic binders can also be used. Further, in the support preparation, as well as in subsequent steps, great care should be taken to limit the concentration of catalytic poisons for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction to acceptable levels. Such poisons typically encompass alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, sulphur and chloride. Preferably, the first activation step comprises reduction of a substantial portion of the catalytically active metal compound present to the metal. Preferably, the reducing gas used in the first and/or second activation step is hydrogen and the reduction in the first and/or second activation step is carried out at an activation temperature of 200 to 600° C., preferably 300 to 450° C. for both activation steps. However, the preferred reduction temperature will depend on the actual support used and the way of making the oxide catalyst. Sometimes it can be convenient to split the reduction step(s) into further reduction steps or to include polishing by using a lower concentration of hydrogen, e.g. less than 5 vol %, in an inert carrying gas. A polishing step can reduce residual amounts of components from the impregnation such as nitrate. CO can also be used as the reducing gas, either alone or mixed with H2, and the reducing gas can be mixed with inerts like nitrogen, noble gases or steam and suitable temperatures and pressures should be applied. If a fluidized bed reactor is used for activation, it may be convenient to use a recycle of (part of) the reductive gas and a slight atmospheric total overpressure in order to achieve a suitable gas flow. It is also possible to use elevated total pressures, e.g. up to 8 bar or higher, or even the Fischer-Tropsch reactor pressure. Selection of the reduction temperature strongly depends on the actual catalyst formulation, in particular on the presence and nature of promoters. It is well known that Re is highly efficient as a promoter in achieving high reducibilities at a conveniently reduced temperature.


Optimal activation procedures are described in a variety of patents and articles during the last 20 years. Kobylinski et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,670,414) describe increased activity of cobalt carbonyl-impregnated catalysts on alumina or silica by subjecting them to (A) reduction in hydrogen, (B) oxidation in an oxygen-containing gas, and (C) reduction in hydrogen, claiming this significantly improved the catalysts performance in Fischer-Tropsch. In another patent (U.S. Pat. No. 4,729,981) Kobylinski et al. describes use of the same method on a cobalt or nickel containing catalyst on refractory metal oxide support. Raje (US 2004/0127585 A1) describes co-feeding parts-per-million quantities of carbon monoxide along with the reducing gas in a slurry to reduce the loss of liquid from the slurry and the production of methane. In another patent (U.S. Pat. No. 7,045,554) Raje describes how low levels of oxygen deactivates the smaller more unstable metal crystallites present in the catalyst matrix, thus giving a more stable catalyst.


The modifying step that follows the first reduction step comprises treatment with a modifying gas, preferably selected from CO, CO2 and steam. The modifying gas can also contain a portion of hydrogen. On a reduced catalyst, CO can decompose to give a carbon deposit. The modifying gas may be considered to provide an oxidative effect. The modifying gas may comprise an oxygen containing gas, such as oxygen and/or air, as an alternative or in addition to CO, CO2 and/or steam.


Preferably, the modifying gas is steam, though it may be a mixture of H2 and CO, in which case the H2/CO ratio is preferably between 1/1 and 10/1, preferably between 2/1 and 5/1. If the modifying gas is a mixture of H2 and CO, a Fischer-Tropsch reaction can be conducted that generates steam in situ, thereby introducing an oxidation potential.


Preferably, the modifying gas treatment step is followed by a treatment with an oxygen containing gas, before the modified activated supported catalyst material is subjected to the second activation step. Preferably, the modifying gas comprises CO and the oxygen containing gas comprises O2 or air. Preferably, in the modifying gas treatment step, the activated supported catalyst is treated with CO under different conditions to the conditions under which it is treated with at least one gas selected from O2, an oxygen containing gas and air.


Preferably, the water content of the modifying gas has a lower limit of at least 2vol %, preferably at least 5vol %, more preferably at least 20vol %.


The modifying gas treatment may be carried out at a temperature in the range 100 to 500° C., preferably 200 to 350° C., and at a pressure in the range of 0 to 40 bar, preferably 1 to 30 bar, in certain embodiments preferably between 10 and 30 bar.


The invention also extends to catalyst material made in accordance with the invention. Conveniently, the cobalt content of the catalyst is from 10 to 40% by weight, preferably from 12 to 25% by weight. The catalyst may incorporate less than 3% by weight of a promoter, preferably less than 0.5 wt %, such as platinum or rhenium.


Amorphous catalyst support materials typically have specific surface areas between 50 and 500 m2/g, more typically between 100 and 400 m2/g. The preferred alumina starting materials used in the present invention are all, at least predominantly, of the γ-alumina type, preferably with specific surface areas between 150 and 200 m2/g. These supports can be prepared by spray-drying techniques of an appropriate solution in order to obtain essentially spherical particles of appropriate size, e.g. 80% in the range between 30-200 μm. After spray-drying, the material is calcined at a high temperature to give the appropriate crystal size and pore structure.


Preferably, the specific surface area of the prepared oxide catalyst, comprising the cobalt oxide on the modified support, is up to 150 m2/g or up to 100 m2/g, and the pore volume of the prepared catalyst is from 0.05 to 0.5cm3/g, preferably 0.1 to 0.4 m2/g. Preferably, the pore diameter of the prepared catalyst is at least 10 nm, preferably 18 nm.


The invention also extends to the use of the catalyst in an F-T synthesis, which may be conducted in a fixed bed reactor or a non-fixed bed reactor, such as a slurry bubble column.


The invention also extends to a process for the production of hydrocarbons which comprise subjecting H2 and CO gases to a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reaction in a reactor in the presence of a catalyst of the invention. The process can be conducted under typical F-T operating conditions.


Preferably, therefore, the reaction is a three-phase reaction in which the reactants are gaseous, the product is at least partially liquid and the catalyst is solid, and is carried out in a slurry bubble column reactor. Preferably, the H2 and CO are supplied to a slurry in the reactor, the slurry comprising the catalyst in suspension in a liquid including the reaction products of the H2 and CO, the catalyst being maintained in suspension in the slurry at least partly by the motion of the gas supplied to the slurry. The reaction temperature may be in the range 190 to 260° C., preferably 210 to 240° C., and the pressure may be in the range 10 to 60 bar, preferably 15 to 30 bar. The H2/CO ratio of the gas fed to the reactor may be in the range 0.5 to 2.2, preferably 1.2 to 1.95, and the superficial gas velocity may be in the range 5 to 60 cm/s, preferably 20 to 40 cm/s. The products can be subjected to various post-processing operations, such as filtration, de-waxing, hydro-isomerisation and/or hydro-cracking.


The invention will now be illustrated in the following non-limiting examples where all the catalyst testing was performed in a fixed bed laboratory unit with four parallel fixed-bed reactors. Approximately 1 g of catalyst particles in a size fraction between 53 and 90 microns were mixed with 20 g of inert SiC. Reduction was performed in situ at 350° C. for 16 h in hydrogen before the oxidative treatment step and the second reduction step. The subsequent Fischer-Tropsch performance step was carried out in a mixture of hydrogen and CO at a ratio of 2:1. After 20 h on stream at 210° C. and 20 bar total pressure, the space velocity was adjusted to give an estimated conversion level of CO between 45 and 50% after 100 h. It is very important to perform selectivity, as well as activity, comparisons at the same level of conversion, as the level of steam generated in the reaction has a profound influence on the catalyst performance.


Example 1

Table 1 give the results from different catalysts treated with an RSR method, in which the nomination is as follows:


R: Reduction step with hydrogen at 350° C.


S: Oxidation step with steam at 300° C.


The results are given as RSR/R meaning activity and selectivity after RSR treatment relative to ordinary activation with reduction only.









TABLE 1







RSR treated catalysts.










Relative activity
Relative selectivity to


Catalyst
(RSR/R)
C5+ (RSR/R)












20 Co/0.5 Re on gamma-alumina
0.89
1.03


12 Co/0.5 Re on alpha-alumina
0.98
0.99


12 Co/0.5 Re on titania
0.94
1.02


12 Co/0.5 Re on modified alumina
1.04
1.05


by WO 2005/072866











As can be seen, all the catalysts except the one on alpha-alumina react positively to the RSR treatment regarding the selectivity to C5+, while the 12Co/0.5 Re on modified alumina is clearly the best regarding activity, being the only one reacting positive on activity by the RSR treatment.


Example 2

The catalyst made using the method described in WO 2005/072866 is treated by RXR, X being the same or different treatment compared to Example 1. X is described below:


S: Steam at 300° C.


S′: Steam and hydrogen at 300° C.


FT 300: hydrogen/carbon monoxide=3 at 300° C.


FT 24: Fischer-Tropsch conditions for 24 h


CO: Carbon monoxide at 300° C.


CO2: Carbon dioxide at 300° C.


O: Air at 300° C.


CO—O: Carbon monoxide at 300° C. followed by air at 300° C.


The results are given in Table 2 as RXR/R meaning activity and selectivity after RXR treatment relative to ordinary activation with reduction only.









TABLE 2







RXR treated catalysts.










Relative
Relative selectivity



activity
to C5+


Treatment, X=
(RXR/R)
(RXR/R)





S
1.04
1.05


S′
1.05
1.05


R′ (see definition
0.98
1.03


under the table)




FT300
1.13
1.03


FT24
1.00
1.01


CO
0.50
0.59


CO2
1.08
1.02


O
1.13
1.00


CO—O
1.20
1.00









R′ involves only a modified reduction step where steam is added, in other words RSR is combined into a single R′ step.


It is seen from Table 2 that the CO treatment gives very different results compared to all others, being detrimental for the catalyst regarding both activity and selectivity. It is further seen from the table that all other treatments improve or stabilize the C5+ selectivity, while there is a greater difference in the impact on activity. The best allover influence of the treatment is with hydrogen/carbon monoxide 3/1 at 300° C. or carbon monoxide followed by calcination in the oxidizing step.

Claims
  • 1. A method of producing an activated supported cobalt catalyst, the method comprising the steps of: impregnating an initial support material with a source of cobalt to produce an impregnated support material;calcining the impregnated support material to produce a supported catalyst material, the supported catalyst material being in an oxide form;activating the supported catalyst material with a first reducing gas to produce an activated supported catalyst material;treating of the activated supported catalyst material with a modifying gas to produce a modified activated supported catalyst material, wherein the modifying gas is an oxidative gas comprising at least one gas chosen from the group consisting of CO, CO2 and steam, and optionally a portion of hydrogen; andactivating the modified activated supported catalyst material with a second reducing gas to produce the activated supported cobalt catalyst having a relative activity ratio (RXR/R) greater than 1.00, wherein (RXR) is an activity of the modified activated supported catalyst material and (R) is an activity of the activated supported catalyst material.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the initial support material is alumina.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the initial alumina support material at least predominantly comprises γ-alumina.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the initial alumina support material has a specific surface area in the range 100 to 400 m2/g.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the initial alumina support material has a pore volume greater than 0.2 cm3/g.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, further comprising incorporating a stabilizer into the initial alumina support material prior to the cobalt impregnation step.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the stabilizer comprises lanthanum.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising impregnating the initial support material with a 2-valent metal source prior to the cobalt impregnation step.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the 2-valent metal source comprises cobalt, zinc, magnesium, manganese, nickel or iron.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the 2-valent metal source comprises nickel in an amount of less than 20 wt % of the final reduced catalyst.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the 2-valent metal source comprises nickel or zinc in an amount of less than 8 wt % of the final reduced catalyst.
  • 12. The method of claim 8, further comprising calcining the initial support material after the 2-valent metal impregnation step and prior to the cobalt impregnation step.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the calcination step after the 2-valent metal impregnation step and prior to the cobalt impregnation step is carried out at a temperature in the range of 900 to 1250° C.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising impregnating or co-impregnating the initial support material or the modified activated supported catalyst material with a promoter.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the promoter comprises platinum or rhenium.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the promoter is rhenium chosen from the group consisting of perrhenic acid (HReO4), ammonium perrhenate, rhenium halide, rhenium halides, rhenium carbonyl and rhenium carbonyls.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the cobalt impregnation step comprises an incipient wetness treatment in which an aqueous solution of cobalt is mixed with the initial support material until the pores are filled, and the impregnated support material is then dried prior to the calcining step.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the aqueous solution of cobalt is chosen from the groups consisting of cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2), a cobalt acetate, cobalt acetates, a cobalt halide, cobalt halides, a cobalt carbonyl, cobalt carbonyls, a cobalt oxalate, cobalt oxalates, a cobalt phosphate, cobalt phosphates, a cobalt carbonate, cobalt carbonates, a cobalt (hexa)amine salt, cobalt (hexa)amine salts, and organic cobalt compounds.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the drying is carried out at 80 to 120° C.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the activation of the supported catalyst material step comprises reduction of a substantial portion of the catalytically active metal compound present to the metal.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the first reducing gas and the second reducing gas is hydrogen.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the activation of the supported catalyst material step, the activation of the modified activated supported catalyst material step, or both the activation of the supported catalyst material step and the activation of the modified activated supported catalyst material step is carried out at an activation temperature of 200 to 600° C.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein both activation steps are carried out at the activation temperature in the range of 300 to 450° C.
  • 24. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying gas further comprises the portion of hydrogen.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the modifying gas comprises H2 and CO.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the H2/CO ratio is between 1/1 and 10/1.
  • 27. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying gas comprises an oxygen containing gas.
  • 28. The method of claim 1, further comprising treating the modified activated support catalyst material with an oxygen containing gas prior to the activation of the modified supported catalyst material step.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the modifying gas comprises CO and the oxygen containing gas comprises O2 or air.
  • 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the modifying gas treatment step in which the activated supported catalyst material is modified with CO is under different conditions than the treatment step in which the activated supported catalyst material is treated with the oxygen containing gas.
  • 31. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying gas has a water content of at least 2 vol %.
  • 32. The method of claim 1, wherein the in which the modifying gas treatment step is carried out at a temperature in the range 100 to 500° C.
  • 33. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying gas treatment step is carried out at a pressure in the range of 0 to 40 bar.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0915207.5 Sep 2009 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/GB2010/001647 8/31/2010 WO 00 3/1/2012
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2011/027104 3/10/2011 WO A
US Referenced Citations (188)
Number Name Date Kind
1746464 Fischer et al. Feb 1930 A
2102851 La Brie Dec 1937 A
2548159 Houtman et al. Apr 1951 A
2666756 Thomas et al. Jan 1954 A
2830877 Appell Apr 1958 A
2916356 Keith et al. Dec 1959 A
2982793 Turner et al. May 1961 A
2987487 Stevens et al. Jun 1961 A
3025248 Rosinski Mar 1962 A
3068303 Pattison Dec 1962 A
3108888 Bugosh Oct 1963 A
3141742 Dye et al. Jul 1964 A
3235515 Earl Feb 1966 A
3270059 Siegfried Winderl et al. Aug 1966 A
3331787 Keith et al. Jul 1967 A
3344196 Hubert et al. Sep 1967 A
3397154 Herbert Aug 1968 A
3403111 Colgan et al. Sep 1968 A
3407149 Taylor et al. Oct 1968 A
3423194 Kearby Jan 1969 A
3437586 Weisz Apr 1969 A
3441251 Burns Apr 1969 A
3565830 Keith et al. Feb 1971 A
3591649 Kroll et al. Jul 1971 A
3692701 Box et al. Sep 1972 A
3751508 Fujiso et al. Aug 1973 A
3825504 Hilfman Jul 1974 A
3840471 Acres Oct 1974 A
3853790 Vosolsobe et al. Dec 1974 A
3876557 Bland et al. Apr 1975 A
3881696 Lepeytre et al. May 1975 A
3883444 Maselli et al. May 1975 A
3933883 Parthasarathy et al. Jan 1976 A
3966640 Katz et al. Jun 1976 A
3988263 Hansford Oct 1976 A
4049582 Erickson et al. Sep 1977 A
4055513 Wheelock Oct 1977 A
4065484 Dobashi Dec 1977 A
4080390 Imamura Mar 1978 A
4088608 Tanaka et al. May 1978 A
4102777 Wheelock Jul 1978 A
4102822 Mulaskey Jul 1978 A
4191664 McArthur Mar 1980 A
4200552 Noguchi et al. Apr 1980 A
4219444 Hill et al. Aug 1980 A
4233186 Duprez et al. Nov 1980 A
4237030 Noguchi et al. Dec 1980 A
4247730 Brunelle Jan 1981 A
4285837 Sato et al. Aug 1981 A
4368142 Frohning et al. Jan 1983 A
4440956 Couvillon Apr 1984 A
4454207 Fraioli et al. Jun 1984 A
4456703 Aldridge Jun 1984 A
4499209 Hoek et al. Feb 1985 A
4539310 Leftin et al. Sep 1985 A
4585798 Beuther et al. Apr 1986 A
4595703 Payne et al. Jun 1986 A
4610975 Baker et al. Sep 1986 A
4613624 Beuther et al. Sep 1986 A
4626521 Murib Dec 1986 A
4670414 Kobylinski et al. Jun 1987 A
4717702 Beuther et al. Jan 1988 A
4729981 Kobylinski et al. Mar 1988 A
4801573 Eri et al. Jan 1989 A
4801620 Fujitani et al. Jan 1989 A
4857559 Eri et al. Aug 1989 A
4870044 Kukes et al. Sep 1989 A
4880763 Eri et al. Nov 1989 A
4888316 Gardner et al. Dec 1989 A
4895816 Gardner et al. Jan 1990 A
4957896 Matsumoto et al. Sep 1990 A
4968660 Tijburg et al. Nov 1990 A
4977126 Mauldin et al. Dec 1990 A
4985387 Prigent et al. Jan 1991 A
4988661 Arai Jan 1991 A
5037792 Luck Aug 1991 A
5100859 Gerdes et al. Mar 1992 A
5102851 Eri et al. Apr 1992 A
5110780 Peters May 1992 A
5116801 Luck May 1992 A
5116879 Eri et al. May 1992 A
5268091 Boitiaux et al. Dec 1993 A
5380697 Matusz et al. Jan 1995 A
5552363 Pannell et al. Sep 1996 A
5565092 Pannell et al. Oct 1996 A
5565400 Holmgren Oct 1996 A
5639798 Wilson et al. Jun 1997 A
5744419 Choudhary et al. Apr 1998 A
5851948 Chuang et al. Dec 1998 A
5856263 Bhasin et al. Jan 1999 A
5874381 Bonne et al. Feb 1999 A
5965481 Durand et al. Oct 1999 A
5977012 Kharas et al. Nov 1999 A
6019954 Tang et al. Feb 2000 A
6022755 Kinnari et al. Feb 2000 A
6069111 Yamamoto et al. May 2000 A
6075062 Zennaro et al. Jun 2000 A
6100304 Singleton et al. Aug 2000 A
6211255 Schanke et al. Apr 2001 B1
6235798 Roy et al. May 2001 B1
6255358 Singleton et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262132 Singleton et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271432 Singleton et al. Aug 2001 B2
6284217 Wang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6365544 Herron et al. Apr 2002 B2
6465530 Roy-Auberger et al. Oct 2002 B2
6472441 Kibby Oct 2002 B1
6486220 Wright Nov 2002 B1
6486221 Lapidus et al. Nov 2002 B2
6515035 Roy-Auberger et al. Feb 2003 B2
6537945 Singleton et al. Mar 2003 B2
6596667 Bellusi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596781 Schinski Jul 2003 B1
6649803 Mart et al. Nov 2003 B2
6689819 Bellussi et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696502 Mart et al. Feb 2004 B1
6734137 Wang et al. May 2004 B2
6780817 Koyama Aug 2004 B1
6800664 Espinoza et al. Oct 2004 B1
6818589 Gillespie Nov 2004 B1
6822008 Srinivasan et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825237 Schweitzer et al. Nov 2004 B2
6835690 Van Berge et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835756 Font Freide et al. Dec 2004 B2
6927190 Lok et al. Aug 2005 B2
6958310 Wang et al. Oct 2005 B2
7012103 Espinoza et al. Mar 2006 B2
7012104 Espinoza et al. Mar 2006 B2
RE39073 Herbolzheimer et al. Apr 2006 E
7022644 Foong et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041866 Gillespie May 2006 B1
7045554 Raje et al. May 2006 B2
7067562 Espinoza et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071239 Ortego et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078439 Odueyungbo et al. Jul 2006 B2
7097786 Dindi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7163963 Fraenkel Jan 2007 B2
7226574 Long et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230035 Espinoza et al. Jun 2007 B2
7253136 Mauldin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7256154 Moon et al. Aug 2007 B2
7276540 Espinoza et al. Oct 2007 B2
7341976 Espinoza et al. Mar 2008 B2
7351393 Bayense et al. Apr 2008 B1
7351679 Eri et al. Apr 2008 B2
7361626 Baijense et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365040 Van Berge et al. Apr 2008 B2
7402612 Jin et al. Jul 2008 B2
7417073 Mauldin et al. Aug 2008 B2
7422995 Baijense et al. Sep 2008 B2
7452844 Hu et al. Nov 2008 B2
7473667 Hagemeyer et al. Jan 2009 B2
7541310 Espinoza et al. Jun 2009 B2
8143186 Rytter Mar 2012 B2
8324128 Rytter et al. Dec 2012 B2
20010031793 Singleton et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032965 Wang et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010051588 Herron et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020028853 Manzer et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020094932 Faber et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020131914 Sung Sep 2002 A1
20020172642 Dindi et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030119668 Lok et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030158037 Foong et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040054016 Lu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040077737 Eri et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040110852 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127585 Raje Jul 2004 A1
20040138060 Rapier et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138317 Xie et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040180784 Hagemeyer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040204506 Mauldin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050184009 Jansen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050245621 Baijense et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272827 Lok Dec 2005 A1
20060009352 Zhao et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060167119 Leng et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060223693 Fujimoto et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070099797 Hu et al. May 2007 A1
20070161714 Rytter et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080064770 Rytter et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080255256 Rytter Oct 2008 A1
20100022388 Soled et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022670 Soled et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100029792 Diehl et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100099780 Rytter et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100184872 Eri et al. Jul 2010 A1
20130199966 Koranne et al. Aug 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
0042471 Mar 1981 EP
0296726 Jun 1988 EP
313375 Apr 1989 EP
690119 Jun 1994 EP
1129776 May 2001 EP
0736326 Aug 2001 EP
1445018 Aug 2004 EP
1632289 Mar 2006 EP
1183201 Mar 1970 GB
2053712 Feb 1981 GB
2 258 826 Feb 1993 GB
2416715 Feb 2006 GB
58139744 Aug 1983 JP
2003024786 Jan 2003 JP
WO9312879 Jul 1993 WO
WO9600613 Jan 1996 WO
WO9942214 Aug 1999 WO
WO9961143 Dec 1999 WO
WO0020116 Apr 2000 WO
WO0025918 May 2000 WO
WO 0136352 May 2001 WO
WO0162381 Aug 2001 WO
WO0202229 Jan 2002 WO
WO0247816 Jun 2002 WO
WO02089978 Nov 2002 WO
WO03002252 Jan 2003 WO
WO2004035193 Apr 2004 WO
WO2005060448 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005072866 Aug 2005 WO
WO2006010936 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006067285 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007093825 Aug 2007 WO
WO2008129034 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009118372 Oct 2009 WO
WO2011027104 Mar 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Compressed Air and Gas Institute (What is Clean, Dry Air?) TAP #106, published Nov. 1, 2005.
Stevens et al., Qatar Fertilizer Company, in the proceedings of Nitrogen + Syngas 2008 conference conducted in Moscow, pp. 20-23. Apr. 2008.
Catalyst Handbook, 2nd edition, M.V. Twigg, editor Wolfe Publishing, London 1989. pp. 77-81.
Luo et al., “Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: Group II alkali-earth metal promoted catalysts”, Applied Catalysis. pp. 171-181 (2003).
Madikizela et al. Applied Catalysis A: General 272 (2004) 339-346).
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/002111 dated May 25, 2012.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB01/05461 dated Mar. 1, 2002.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB03/04873 dated Mar. 25, 2004.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001647 dated Nov. 2, 2010.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/510,867 Sep. 24, 2012, inventors Rytter et al.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2008/000300 dated Jul. 25, 2008.
Betancourt, P et al., “A Study of the Ruthenium—Alumina System”, Applied Catalysis A: General. vol. 170, pp. 307-314 (1998).
Van De Loosdrecht et al., “Calcination of Co-based Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Catalysts,” Topics of Catalysis, vol. 26, Nos. 1-4, pp. 121-127. (Dec. 2003).
Borg, Øyvind et al., “Effect of Calcination Atmosphere and Temperature on γ-Al2O3 Supported Colbalt Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts, ”Topics in Catalysis, vol. 45, Nos. 1-4, pp. 39-43 (Aug. 2007).
Schulz, “Major and Minor Reactions in Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis on Colbalt Catalysts” Topics in Catalysis, 26 91-4): 73-85 (2003).
Li Fan et al., Supercritical-phase Process for Selective Synthesis of Wax from Syngas: Catalyst and Process Development. Catalysis Today, 36:295-306/ 1997.
ASTM Standard D4058-96, 2001, “Standard Test Method for Attrition and Abrasion of Catalysts and Catalyst Carriers”, ASTM Int'l. West Conshohoken, PA. Viewed on Feb. 19, 2009 at http://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D4058-96R01.htm.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2005/003675 dated Dec. 9, 2005 and GB0421242.9. dated Aug. 17, 2005.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB2005/000287 dated May 18, 2005 and GB0401829.7 dated May 6, 2005.
Iglesia et al., “Selectivity Control and Catalyst Design in the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: Site, Pellets and Reactors”, Advances in Catalysis, vol. 3. (1993).
Saib et al., “Silica supported colbalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts: Effect of Pore Diameter of Support”, Catalysis Today, 71: 395-402 (2002).
Tang et al., “Partial Oxidation of Methane of Synthesis Gas Over Alpha-AL203-Supported Bimetallic PT-CO Catalysts”, Catalysis Letters, Baltzer, Scientific Publ. Basel, CH. vol. 59, No. 2/4. Jun. 1999. pp. 129-135.
Oukaci et al., “Comparison of patented Co. F-T catalysts using fixed-bed and slurry bubble column reactors” Applied Catalysis A: General Elsevier Scienc, Amsterdamn, NL, vol. 186, No. 1-2. Oct. 4, 1999, pp. 120-144.
Iglesia et al., “Reactions-Transport Selectivity Models and the Design of Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts,” Computer-Aided Design of Catalysts, Edited by Becker and Pereira. Ch. 7. pp. 199-257. 1993.
Jacobs et al, “Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis XAFS XAFS studies of the effect of water on a PT-promoted Ca/Al2O3 catalyst”, Applied Catalysis, 247:335-343. (2003).
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/433,846, filed Nov. 10, 2003, inventors Eri et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/535,066, filed Mar. 15, 2006, inventors Rytter et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/587,825, filed Feb. 2, 2007 inventors Rytter et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/663,663, filed Feb. 14, 2008, inventor Rytter.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/525,070, filed Mar. 26, 2010, inventors Eri et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/582,541, filed Oct. 20, 2009, inventor Rytter et al.
Taylor, “An Introduction to Error Analysis”, 2nd Ed. (1997). 329 pages. Chs. 1 and 2 provided.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/814,905, filed Apr. 19, 2013, inventors Koranne et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120149787 A1 Jun 2012 US