Not Applicable
1. Field of Invention
The present invention pertains to the field of fishing. More particularly, this invention is a tool for crimping the barb of a fishhook in order to better facilitate fishermen in releasing fish with minimal injury to the fish.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the field of fishing, it is well know that conventional fishhooks are configured to define a rearwardly-extending barb at the distal end thereof in order to set the hook once a fish has attempted to swallow the bait. In the sport of fishing, once a fish bites the bait, the fisherman sets the hook in the mouth of the fish by gently yanking the rod back, thus engaging the hook in the mouth of the fish. Once the barb has passed through the fish, the hook is set. In order to remove the hook, the hook is backed out of the fish, with the barb further injuring the fish. In many instances, removing the hook can cause more harm to the fish than setting the hook.
It is also well known in the sport of fishing that many fishermen catch and release fish simply for the enjoyment of catching the fish. In such situations, it is desirable to do minimal damage to the fish, and to cause as little trauma to the fish as necessary.
Several devices have been developed to overcome these and similar problems associated with catch-and-release fishing. Typical of the art are those devices disclosed in the following U.S. patents:
For example, Ashley ('690) discloses a fishhook having a retractable barb. The hook defines a hollow sleeve in which is disposed a spring wire member. The spring wire member defines a barb extending from an opening in the distal end of the hook. The proximal end of the spring wire extends from the proximal end of the hook. Once the hook has been set, the proximal end of the spring wire member is inserted further into the hollow sleeve, forcing the distal end of the spring member into a cavity in the distal end of the hook. In so doing, the barb is retracted into the hollow sleeve and the hook is then removed from the fish. J. H. Mitchell ('375) discloses a fishhook having a retractable barb.
In the '014 patent, Thomas, Jr. et al., disclose a device configured to be attached to a fishhook in order to render the barb ineffective. The device is attachable to the end of a fishhook shank or to the eye of the hook. A loop portion of the device conforms generally to the bight of the fishhook. A tip is adapted to engage the barb of the fishhook. The tip engages the barb on the such that the barb is shielded from engagement with the fish in order to allow removal of the hook without causing further injury to the fish.
Brief, in the '373 patent, discloses a barbless fishhook. The '373 fishhook includes a shank portion defining a hook portion at one end and an eyelet at the other end thereof. A guard member is formed of spring wire. The guard member is secured to the shank portion and extends toward the point of the fishhook. The guard member is deflected away from the point when the hook is set in a fish, and prevents a fish from being dislodged from the hook. The guard member is engaged to release the fish from the hook member.
The '371 patent issued to Preiser discloses a retractable, barbless fishhook. The Preiser fishhook generally includes a hollow body portion open at each end. A barbless bend segment of a shank is fully retractable within one end of the body portion. The distal end of the bend segment carries a sharpened point and the proximal end of the bend segment is linked to a flexible shank which is slidably movable within the longitudinal channel of the body portion. An eye is defined by the proximal end of the shank on the outside of the body portion. A biasing element is carried within the longitudinal channel of the body portion and surrounds a portion of the shank to return the bend segment, after retraction, to a fully extended position.
The '622 patent issued to James discloses a barbless fishhook assembly. The assembly is comprised of a hook body having an eye, a shank and a curved bend terminating in a tip and a sleeve of material disposed on the curved bend of the hook body proximate the tip, preferably in an area of reduced cross-section. The sleeve of material is caused, by frictional engagement, to gather against itself against the interior layer in the mouth or internal flesh of the fish. James states that this element provides greater holding power than that associated with the barb of a conventional fishhook.
LaPage et al, ('108) disclose a barbless fishhook claiming improved catch-and-release characteristics. The fishhook defines two depressions with sharp leading edges in the wire of the hook.
In the '628 patent, Perez discloses a fishhook having a shank and an integral curved bend portion terminating in a spear portion ending in a sharp point. The spear portion has an axis generally parallel to the shank with a generally uniform cross-section. The spear has a side facing the shank having a rounded barbed portion between the point and the curved bend portion.
Gerdes, in the '482 patent, discloses a modified hemostat adapted to be used as a multipurpose fishing tool. The '482 device includes a clamping section, a fulcrum and handles. A first pair of extensions each defines a flat-edge and is is positioned to the rear of a toothed section, which is immediately behind the fulcrum and toward the handles. A second pair of extensions, one with a flat edge and one with a sharpened edge, is welded to the handles. In one embodiment, one of each of the first and second pairs of extensions are integrally formed with each other to form a single extension. A fishing line is readily gripped or cut with minimum damage by placing the line between the sharpened edges of the second pair of extensions and then pressing the finger loops inwardly. A split shot can be opened by placing the cut side adjacent the sharpened extension and pressing it against the flat edge of the cooperating flat extension by pressing the finger loops together.
In the '709 patent, Strini discloses a multipurpose fishing tool for tying knots. The '709 tool includes a pair of forceps modified by adding an annular groove around the nose of the forceps. The grove is of sufficient depth to retain a loop of fishing line, which is twisted as the forceps jaws are moved in a rotary motion.
The present invention is a tool for crimping the barb defined by a conventional fishhook is disclosed. The fishhook barb crimping tool is comprised generally of a pair of forceps on which is carried a barb crimping element. The tool is provided for modifying a conventional fishhook to allow a fisherman to catch fish in a catch-and-release manner without causing undue harm to the fish, and without requiring the purchase of more expensive hooks configured specifically for this sport.
The tool is a pair of forceps adapted to include a fishhook barb crimping device. The forceps include first and second arms pivotally mounted to one another at a fulcrum. A first end of each arm defines a selected configuration, with each of the first ends defining an interior face. The interior faces of the two arms cooperate to form a clamp. A second end of each of the arms defines a finger loop. A locking device is provided for locking the arms together such that the interior faces of the first ends contact each other in a mating and locked manner.
A barb crimping element is comprised of a first head carried by the first arm and a second head carried by the second arm between the fulcrum and the finger loops, and preferably proximate the fulcrum. The first and second heads are configured to define an interior face, the two interior faces being configured to cooperate to engage when the finger loops are engaged toward a locked position.
To crimp a fishhook barb, the conventional fishhook is positioned such that the barb is disposed between the first and second barb crimping heads. The finger loops are then engaged and pivoted to a closed position such that the barb is engaged with the interior face of either of the first or second heads and the outside of the hook is engaged with the interior face of the other head. The finger loops are engaged until the barb is crimped, rendering the point of the hook ineffective.
The above-mentioned features of the invention will become more clearly understood from the following detailed description of the invention read together with the drawings in which:
A tool for crimping the barb defined by a conventional fishhook is disclosed. The fishhook barb crimping tool of the present invention is illustrated generally at 10 in the figures. The fishhook barb crimping tool, or tool 10, is comprised generally of a pair of forceps on which is carried a barb crimping element 40. The tool 10 is provided for modifying a conventional fishhook 60 to allow a fisherman to catch fish in a catch-and-release manner without causing undue harm to the fish, and without requiring the purchase of more expensive hooks configured specifically for this sport.
A barb crimping element 40 is comprised of a first head 42 carried by the first arm 12 and a second head 46 carried by the second arm 22. The barb crimping heads 42,46 are disposed between the fulcrum 32 and the finger loops 20,30, and preferably proximate the fulcrum 32. The first and second heads 42,46 are configured to define an interior face 44,48, the two interior faces 44,48 being configured to cooperate to engage when the finger loops 20,30 are engaged toward a locked position. The first and second heads 42,46 are further configured such that the interior faces 44,48 extend above the respective first and second arms 12,22. In the illustrated embodiment, as best shown in
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment of
From the foregoing description, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that a tool for crimping the barb of a conventional fishhook has been provided. A method for using the tool for crimping the barb of a conventional fishhook has also been provided. By using the tool of the present invention in the manner described, a fisherman is able to catch-and-release fish while causing minimal injury to the fish. More specifically, injury to the fish as a result of removing the fishhook for the fish is minimized. 1
While the present invention has been illustrated by description of several embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/554,854, filed Mar. 19, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
505835 | Kulp et al. | Oct 1893 | A |
831477 | Sandall | Sep 1906 | A |
864558 | Richter | Aug 1907 | A |
1022489 | Lyons | Apr 1912 | A |
1069106 | Brice | Aug 1913 | A |
1161526 | Porter | Nov 1915 | A |
1177303 | Carski | Mar 1916 | A |
1219857 | Parkhurst | Mar 1917 | A |
1623689 | Lind | Apr 1927 | A |
1918889 | Bacon | Jul 1933 | A |
2086863 | Geddes | Jul 1937 | A |
2531522 | Malouf | Nov 1950 | A |
2597394 | Snowden | May 1952 | A |
2669992 | Curutchet | Feb 1954 | A |
2853908 | Logan | Sep 1958 | A |
2895478 | Post | Jul 1959 | A |
3106035 | Tennyson | Oct 1963 | A |
3214859 | Watkins | Nov 1965 | A |
3581424 | Bloom | Jun 1971 | A |
3601386 | Estep | Aug 1971 | A |
3624690 | Ashley | Nov 1971 | A |
3675359 | Ohno | Jul 1972 | A |
3786815 | Ericson | Jan 1974 | A |
3791032 | Rogers | Feb 1974 | A |
3841014 | Thomas, Jr. et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3921640 | Freeborn | Nov 1975 | A |
3921641 | Hulka | Nov 1975 | A |
4088134 | Mazzariello | May 1978 | A |
4152797 | Wells, Jr. | May 1979 | A |
4570373 | Brief | Feb 1986 | A |
4625595 | Hsiao | Dec 1986 | A |
4631855 | Ader | Dec 1986 | A |
4858371 | Preiser | Aug 1989 | A |
4896661 | Bogert et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4899482 | Gerdes | Feb 1990 | A |
4998375 | Mitchell | Mar 1991 | A |
5019092 | Klintmalm | May 1991 | A |
5097622 | James | Mar 1992 | A |
5163245 | Russell | Nov 1992 | A |
5207012 | Lael | May 1993 | A |
5336228 | Cholhan | Aug 1994 | A |
5472450 | Mena | Dec 1995 | A |
5497522 | Chen | Mar 1996 | A |
5528850 | Lindstrom | Jun 1996 | A |
5557874 | Pietrandrea et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5685108 | LePage et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5983555 | Biel | Nov 1999 | A |
6061858 | Shepard | May 2000 | A |
6205699 | Bogni | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6272709 | Strini | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289628 | Perez | Sep 2001 | B1 |
20050033353 | Jones | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200071657 | May 2001 | AU |
2599937 | Dec 1987 | FR |
WO-9704648 | Feb 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050204605 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60554854 | Mar 2004 | US |