1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to fishing lines and lures but more particularly to a device which recuperates fishing lures that are stuck underwater.
2. Background
Losing one's lure has been the bane of many fishermen over the years. Since some types of lures are rather expensive, it is sometimes distressing to have to cut one's fishing line because a lure got caught in some underwater log or other debris or vegetation. Sometimes the water is too deep or too cold or both to be able to conveniently get to the lure and unstuck it. There is therefore a need for a practical way of freeing a stuck fishing lure.
It is a main feature of this invention to provide for an inexpensive, practical and efficient way to free a fishing lure that is stuck underwater.
In order to do so, the invention uses some basic readily available components which are used to attach the fishing lure recuperator. The fishing lure recuperator is bent to form a loose noose around the fishing line and is retained in this noose configuration by a connector which is itself attached to a thin rope or twine. As long as the connector is made of metal, it will sink and drag the fishing lure recuperator with it. Once the fishing line recuperator has reached the lure, actually a spot just below it, the fishing lure recuperator will engage an insertion slot which funnels into a small grabber incision sized for a fishing line. In grabbing a hold of the fishing line in that way, it is possible to unstuck a fishing lure even if it often results in breaking the fishing line below the lure and losing the hook. At least, the lure and most of the fishing line is saved when otherwise, a strong pull could snap the line at any point between the reel and the hook, which is especially distressing when it is close to the reel and most of the line is lost which remains in the water and can snare ducks and other water borne birds as well as mammals swimmers and divers as well as motor boat propellers.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of this invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the preferred embodiment of the invention is shown and described, by way of examples. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
ab Perspective views showing the mode of operation.
A fishing lure recuperator (10) comprises a looped piece (11) (shown flattened in
Along the length of the looped piece (11) are two sides (20, 20′) which are not parallel, rather, the side (20′) where the insertion slot (16) is to be found is gabled so that it forms a generally triangular shape wherein the apex of the gable is where the insertion slot (16) is located.
Besides the looped piece (11), a string or cord (24) is used for pulling on the looped piece from the surface. A connector means (22) releasably connects the string or cord (24) to the looped piece (11). The connector means (22) releasably connects through both holes (14, 14′) of the looped piece (11) wherein which both holes (14, 14′) stand relatively mated. The connector means (22) itself is fixedly attached to a cord (24) by way of a knot although any other attachment means, whether permanent or semi-permanent, can be used without departing from the scope of the invention. It should be understood that although the cord (24) and the connector means (22) are essential to the workings of the lure recuperator (10) and that they could be bought as part of a kit, the looped piece (10) itself is the key element and that the connector means can come in a variety of ways besides a bolt snap as shown in the figures without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is important that the lure recuperator (10) be able to sink and therefore a non buoyant object is preferred for the connector means (22) so that the lure recuperator (10) can sink as quickly as possible. Of course any additional non buoyant object, such as lead weight well known to fishermen, can be attached to the cord (24) to make it sink faster. The looped piece is generally made of metal that is not affected by water such as stainless steel but any other non buoyant material offering the strength and surability required is satisfactory.
A user finding his lure caught in some underwater object (100) such as a log or branch or other vegetation or impediment uses the lure recuperator (10) by wrapping it around the fishing line (28), installing the connector means (22) with the cord (24) attached and drops it so that the lure recuperator (10) slides along the fishing line as per
This application claims priority based on provisional application 60/465,515 filed Apr. 28, 2003
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1044792 | Levy | Nov 1912 | A |
1988160 | Butte | Jan 1935 | A |
2074057 | Kempe | Mar 1937 | A |
2187021 | Everson | Jan 1940 | A |
D148809 | McDonald, Jr. | Feb 1948 | S |
2453245 | McDonald, Jr. | Nov 1948 | A |
2481975 | Brooks | Sep 1949 | A |
2482716 | Noelcke | Sep 1949 | A |
2586073 | McKee | Feb 1952 | A |
2597229 | Cox | May 1952 | A |
2712706 | Gendron | Jul 1955 | A |
2722077 | Newman | Nov 1955 | A |
2779120 | Moore | Jan 1957 | A |
2827017 | Ryan | Mar 1958 | A |
2828570 | Bradbury | Apr 1958 | A |
2861377 | Childress | Nov 1958 | A |
2926449 | Louis | Mar 1960 | A |
2940203 | Carter | Jun 1960 | A |
3176425 | Mudd | Apr 1965 | A |
3216143 | Seldon | Nov 1965 | A |
3243911 | Splawinski | Apr 1966 | A |
3246415 | Forbes | Apr 1966 | A |
3360292 | Trammell | Dec 1967 | A |
3364611 | Downing | Jan 1968 | A |
3464138 | Lindner | Sep 1969 | A |
3512292 | Splawinski | May 1970 | A |
3531887 | Bortle | Oct 1970 | A |
3550303 | Western | Dec 1970 | A |
3574967 | Splawinski | Apr 1971 | A |
3623258 | Doane | Nov 1971 | A |
3688429 | Mauck | Sep 1972 | A |
3693277 | Wells | Sep 1972 | A |
3772815 | Burgess | Nov 1973 | A |
3792545 | Hendrickson | Feb 1974 | A |
3987573 | Clayton | Oct 1976 | A |
4145832 | Knight, Jr. | Mar 1979 | A |
4155190 | McInturff et al. | May 1979 | A |
4301610 | Brown | Nov 1981 | A |
4467547 | Chabot | Aug 1984 | A |
4524536 | Eckerson | Jun 1985 | A |
4712324 | Padgett | Dec 1987 | A |
5081784 | Santucci et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5157856 | Packer | Oct 1992 | A |
5485696 | Barton | Jan 1996 | A |
5946844 | Stoliar et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967095 | Greves | Oct 1999 | A |
6092326 | Strome | Jul 2000 | A |
6305119 | Kacak | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6371056 | Phillips | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6442886 | McAfee et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463692 | Johnsen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20020073936 | Fields-Babineau | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040069241 | Falwell | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3904414 | Aug 1990 | DE |
29800932 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19954744 | May 2001 | DE |
1240825 | Sep 2002 | EP |
168186 | Sep 1921 | GB |
2369762 | Jun 2002 | GB |
432772 | Mar 1948 | IT |
2001-169707 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-292678 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-272340 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO-9854959 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040211107 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60465515 | Apr 2003 | US |