1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a fitness hoop, and more particularly, to a weighted fitness hoop used for exercise.
2. Background Art
Hoops have been used by children as toys for several decades. Hoops of this type are typically comprised of a hollow or filled tube formed into a circular ring-shape, e.g., a hula hoop.
In recent years, hoops have been used for exercise purposes. Fitness hoops are often weighted in order to improve the exercise effect through increased muscle activation. This added weight to the hoop may be accomplished by filling the hoop with a heavy material, such as water, or by manufacturing the hoop from a heavy material.
While an impact force created by the weighted fitness hoop is desirable to activate the user's muscles, one problem that occurs with typical weighted fitness hoops is that the impact force often leads to discomfort for the user. For example, with typical weighted fitness hoops, the user may often receive bruising from the high pressure and impact force against the user's skin. For the designer of an fitness hoop, the challenge is to find an optimal balancing point between these forces
Many attempts have been made by others to reduce the pressure of weighted fitness hoops on the skin while also maintaining the hoop's ability to activate the user's muscles. As an example, certain weighted fitness hoops have decreased the overall weight of the hoop such that the pressure exerted on the skin is diminished and the chances of bruising are decreased. Decreasing the weight of the fitness hoop, however, also decreases the fitness hoop's ability to activate the muscles, and thus, its effectiveness.
Some designers of fitness hoops have added a sleeve of high-density foam rubber to cushion the user, but this is too easily compressed and therefore not very effective. In addition, the foam covering is subject to cuts and tears when the hoop comes in contact with walls, chairs, or other objects.
Other attempts have been made to reduce pressure on the skin by increasing the surface area of the fitness hoop. By spreading the force of the fitness hoop over a larger surface area, the pressure exerted on the user's skin can be reduced. These devices have been relatively unsuccessful because an increase in the surface area of the fitness hoop naturally results in increased weight of the fitness hoop. Some designers have tried to work around this problem by flattening the hoop, shaping it more like a belt than a circular tube. This approach increases the inside surface area more than it increases the weight of the hoop.
There is known in the prior art a number of fitness hoops in which the shape has a wavy inner circumference. Contrary to conventional hoops, fitness hoops with a wavy inner circumference do not strike the same part of the body with the same force on each revolution. Since the wavy fitness hoop strikes the body with maximum force at different locations on each revolution, the maximally impacted areas of the user's body are given more time to recover before the next impact. To date, fitness hoops with wavy inner circumferences still however can cause bruising, especially for beginners. Depending upon the exact shape, wavy hoops can load the skin surface with a significantly higher force per unit area than the conventional hoop shape. This is exacerbated with an increased weight of the fitness hoop or with hard materials.
Consequently, it is desirable to produce a weighted fitness hoop that can be used for exercise that reduces bruising or does not bruise the user during use, and does not have unnecessary added weight that increases the fitness hoop's impact on the user's body.
This invention provides a fitness hoop which can address one or more of the problems described above. The fitness hoop according to the invention includes a cushioning system which can act as a guard against the development of overly large impact forces, and which is further designed such that the degree of impact force imparted is different with the direction of revolution of the hoop about the body. This is especially useful for beginners since they can employ the hoop rotating in one direction when beginning an exercise regimen, and after their bodies have adapted to the impact force developed by the hoop, they can simply reverse the rotation direction of the hoop or equivalently flip the hoop over for a more vigorous exercise routine with a higher impact force.
In the following detailed description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawing(s), in which similar elements are designated with similar numerals. The aforementioned accompanying drawings show by way of illustration and not by way of limitation, specific implementations consistent with exemplary embodiments. These implementations are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice an the invention, and it is to be understood that other implementations may be utilized and that structural changes and/or substitutions of various elements may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be construed in a limiting sense.
The hoop 1 has an inner diameter defined by the inner surface 4 of approximately 95 cm. This size is not limiting, however, and the hoop may be manufactured in varying sizes.
In a non-limiting embodiment, the outer element 8, including the outer surface 2, is made of a hard plastic that gives the hoop 1 its rigidity. Further, in a non-limiting embodiment, the inner element 10, including the inner surface 4 and the plurality of inwardly extending chambers 14, may be made of more flexible material, such as a synthetic rubber. For example, a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) may be used. Use of a material that is slightly flexible allows the hoop to maintain its shape without becoming excessively heavy or rigid, as would occur if a hard or brittle plastic were used. Different embodiments may vary the size, material, or color of the outer element 8, inner element 10, outer surface 2, and inner surface 4 depending on the design.
As mentioned above and as further illustrated in
In a non-limiting embodiment, the ribs 16 project inwardly in a counter clockwise direction at a projection angle β. The angle β is defined as an angle between a center line of the rib and a line tangential to a center line of the circumference of the hoop as shown in
A chamber top layer 18, as an example of a connecting member, connects the plurality of ribs as shown in
The chamber 14 is designed to reduce the pressure on the user's skin while maintaining the weight and desirable impact of the hoop 1. To prevent excess weight, in a non-limiting embodiment the chambers 14 are made from a synthetic rubber. Because synthetic rubber is softer than hard plastic, its presence in the chamber 14 helps to reduce pressure on impact. This choice of material, however, is not particularly limiting and a variety of materials may be chosen depending on the design.
While the hoop 1 is in use, the chamber top layer 18 of the chamber 14 will contact the user's skin. The intensity of the contact is a result of the centripetal force, which depends on the hoop's weight, its diameter, its speed of rotation, and the variable acceleration caused by the variable geometry of the user's body and the user's movements. For a typical user spinning a 1.7 kg hoop, the centripetal force will tend to be in the size order of 4-8 kg. The ribs 16 have therefore been designed so that they are fully compressed with a force of approximately 8 kg. At this amount of compression, there will be no air left in the compression chamber, and the top layer 18 will be lying flat, in contact with the material underneath. The amount of compression, and thus, the shock absorption capability of the chambers 14 will vary depending on the projection angle β of the ribs because it is the angle at which the ribs 16 support the top layer 18 as it contacts the user's skin. For example, ribs 16 with projection angles closer to 90° degrees will compress less than ribs 16 with lower projection angles, leading to a stronger impact.
In a non-limiting embodiment, where the projection angle β is not equal to 90°, the chambers 14 will compress less and be more rigid and stiffer when the hoop 1 is rotating in a clockwise direction, against the ribs, as opposed to when the hoop 1 is rotating in a counter clockwise direction along with the projection angle of the ribs. Thus, in this non-limiting embodiment, the user has the options to rotate the hoop 1 in a counter clockwise direction for a lower pressure level exerted on the user's skin or in a clockwise direction for a higher pressure level exerted on the user's skin. That is, the user has the ability to choose their preferred impact level by selecting between two shock absorption possibilities.
As shown in
When the compression chamber 14 is flattened, the deformation is not going to be completely elastic. Some of the energy that goes into deforming the rubber during the compression phase, will not be released again during decompression, but will be retained. This will have the effect of slowing down the hoop, and requiring that the user spends additional muscle energy in order to maintain the rotation of the hoop 1, resulting in a more intense aerobic component to the exercise. The magnitude of this effect will depend on the direction of rotation.
The discussion above refers to the hoop in the orientation it has in
As shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4052982 | Ozeryansky | Oct 1977 | A |
6309273 | Kim | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319086 | Shen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6712779 | Iverson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7303458 | Wolfinbarger | Dec 2007 | B1 |
20080220691 | Kim | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090017719 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150018175 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |