Fitness tracking for constrained-arm usage

Abstract
A system and method for collecting motion data using a fitness tracking device located on an arm of a user, detecting that the arm is constrained based on the motion data, estimating a stride length of the user based on the motion data and historical step cadence-to-stride length data, calculating fitness data using the estimated stride length, and outputting the fitness data to the user.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to fitness tracking devices and, more particularly, to wearable devices used in conjunction with human activities in which a user's arm may be constrained, such as pushing a stroller.


BACKGROUND

Fitness tracking devices may detect user motion using one or more sensors, such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, barometers, and GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) receivers. Using motion data obtained from these sensors, a fitness tracking device may calculate and output various fitness data of interest to the user, such as number of steps taken, distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, and exercise time.


Smartwatches and other arm-worn devices may sense arm swing motion to determine the user's stride length. For example, fitness tracking devices may use accelerometer energy to calculate stride length. Stride length, along with step cadence, may be used to determine the user's speed among other fitness data. If the user's arm motion is constrained, some fitness tracking devices may underestimate stride length, leading to inaccurate fitness data being presented to the user.


Some fitness tracking devices may estimate the amount of work being performed based on the user's body mass and speed. Even if the user's stride length could be accurately determined when the arm is constrained, the calculated fitness data may not account for the increased work performed when pushing a stroller or other substantial load.


SUMMARY

According to one aspect of the present disclosure, method comprises: collecting motion data using a fitness tracking device located on an arm of a user; detecting, by a processor circuit, that the arm is constrained based on the motion data; estimating, by a processor circuit, a stride length of the user based on the motion data and historical step cadence-to-stride length data; calculating, by a processor circuit, fitness data using the estimated stride length; and outputting the fitness data to the user.


In some embodiments, calculating the fitness data comprises calculating at least one of distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, or exercise time. In certain embodiments, detecting that the arm is constrained comprises: determining a pose angle based on the motion data; determining an accelerometer energy based on the motion data; and detecting that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle and the accelerometer energy. In particular embodiments, detecting that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle comprises detecting that the arm is constrained if the pose angle is within a predetermined range of pose angles. In some embodiments, the predetermined range of pose angles corresponds to pose angles greater than about −45°.


In certain embodiments, estimating the stride length of the user based on historical step cadence-to-stride length data comprises: obtaining a plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs; interpolating the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs to generate a curve; and finding a point on the curve corresponding to a measured step cadence of the user. In some embodiments, obtaining the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs comprises obtaining calibration data for the user. In particular embodiments, obtaining the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs comprises obtaining data for a general population of users.


In some embodiments, the method comprises: detecting, by a processor circuit, that the user is pushing an object across a surface based on the motion data; and estimating an increased load due to the object being pushed, wherein calculating the fitness data comprises calculating the fitness data based on the estimated increased load. In certain embodiments, detecting that the user is pushing an object across a surface comprises: calculating, by a processor circuit, road noise as a ratio of accelerometer data within a first frequency band to accelerometer energy within a second frequency band; and comparing, by a processor circuit, the road noise to a threshold value. In some embodiments, the first frequency band comprises frequencies above 20 Hz and the second frequency band comprises frequencies below 4 Hz.


According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a system comprises: a motion sensor located on an appendage of a user and configured to collect motion data; and a processor circuit coupled to the motion sensor and configured to execute instructions causing the processor circuit to perform embodiments of the method described above.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various objectives, features, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter can be more fully appreciated with reference to the following detailed description of the disclosed subject matter when considered in connection with the following drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements.



FIG. 1 shows an example of a fitness tracking device, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of illustrative components that may be found within a fitness tracking device, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 shows an example of a companion device, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 illustrates a fitness tracking device used with a constrained arm, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 illustrates a fitness tracking device used while pushing an object across a surface, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 is a graph of pose angle versus accelerometer energy, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 7 is a graph of step cadence versus stride length, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIG. 8 is a graph of pose angle versus road noise, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 9 and 10 are flowcharts showing processing that may occur within a fitness tracking device and/or companion device, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present disclosure may improve the accuracy of fitness tracking in situations where a user's arm is constrained due to, for example, the user pushing a stroller, holding a beverage or a phone while walking, holding handrails on a treadmill, etc. A constrained-arm condition may be detected by analyzing motion data and, in response, the user's stride length may be estimated using historical step cadence-to-stride length data. The estimated stride length may be used to improve the accuracy of fitness data, such as distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, and exercise time. In some embodiments, the accuracy of fitness data may be further improved by accounting for increased load due to the user pushing a stroller or other object across a surface. Motion data may be used to detect that the user is pushing an object and, in response, increased load due to the object may be inferred and used to improve the accuracy of fitness data.



FIG. 1 shows an example of a fitness tracking device 100, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The illustrative fitness tracking device 100 includes band 102 and housing 104. The band 102 may be used to attach the fitness tracking device 100 to a user's arm. The housing 104 may include one or more components described below in conjunction with FIG. 2. In certain embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 is designed to be worn on the user's wrist.



FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of example components that may be found within a fitness tracking device (e.g., fitness tracking device 100 of FIG. 1), according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. These components may include a motion sensing module 220, a display module 230, and an interface module 240.


The motion sensing module 220 may include one or more motion sensors, such as an accelerometer or a gyroscope. In some embodiments, the accelerometer may be a three-axis, microelectromechanical system (MEMS) accelerometer, and the gyroscope may be a three-axis MEMS gyroscope. A microprocessor (not shown) or motion coprocessor (not shown) of the fitness tracking device 100 may receive data from the motion sensors of the motion sensing module 220 to track acceleration, rotation, position, or orientation information of the fitness tracking device 100 in six degrees of freedom through three-dimensional space.


In some embodiments, the motion sensing module 220 may include other types of sensors in addition to accelerometers and gyroscopes. For example, the motion sensing module 220 may include an altimeter or barometer, or other types of location sensors, such as a GPS sensor. A barometer (also referred to herein as a barometric sensor) can detect pressure changes and correlate the detected pressure changes to an altitude.


Display module 230 may be a screen, such as a crystalline (e.g., sapphire) or glass touchscreen, configured to provide output to the user as well as receive input form the user via touch. For example, display module 230 may be configured to display the number of steps the user has taken, distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, exercise time, amount other fitness data. Display module 230 may receive input from the user to select, for example, which information should be displayed, or whether the user is beginning a physical activity (e.g., starting a session) or ending a physical activity (e.g., ending a session), such as a running session or a cycling session. In some embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may present output to the user in other ways, such as by producing sound with a speaker (not shown), and the fitness tracking device 100 may receive input from the user in other ways, such as by receiving voice commands via a microphone (not shown).


In some embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may communicate with external devices via interface module 240, including a configuration to present output to a user or receive input from a user. Interface module 240 may be a wireless interface. The wireless interface may be a standard Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15) interface, such as Bluetooth v4.0, also known as “Bluetooth low energy.” In other embodiments, the interface may operate according to a cellphone network protocol such as LTE or a Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) protocol. In other embodiments, interface module 240 may include wired interfaces, such as a headphone jack or bus connector (e.g., Lightning, Thunderbolt, USB, etc.).


In certain embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may be configured to communicate with a companion device, such as companion device 300 shown in FIG. 3 and described below in conjunction therewith. In some embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may be configured to communicate with other external devices, such as a notebook or desktop computer, tablet, headphones, Bluetooth headset, etc.


The modules described above are examples, and embodiments of the fitness tracking device 100 may include other modules not shown. For example, fitness tracking device 100 may include one or more microprocessors (not shown) for processing sensor data, motion data, other information in the fitness tracking device 100, or executing instructions for firmware or apps stored in a non-transitory processor-readable medium such as a memory module (not shown). Additionally, some embodiments of the fitness tracking device 100 may include a rechargeable battery (e.g., a lithium-ion battery), a microphone or a microphone array, one or more cameras, one or more speakers, a watchband, a crystalline (e.g., sapphire) or glass-covered scratch-resistant display, water-resistant casing or coating, etc.



FIG. 3 shows an example of a companion device 300, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The fitness tracking device 100 may be configured to communicate with the companion device 300 via a wired or wireless communication channel (e.g., Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, etc.). In some embodiments, the companion device 300 may be a smartphone, tablet, or similar portable computing device. The companion device 300 may be carried by the user, stored in the user's pocket, strapped to the user's arm with an armband or similar device, placed on a table, or otherwise positioned within communicable range of the fitness tracking device 100.


The companion device 300 may include a variety of sensors, such as location and motion sensors (not shown). When the companion device 300 may be optionally available for communication with the fitness tracking device 100, the fitness tracking device 100 may receive additional data from the companion device 300 to improve or supplement its calibration or calorimetry processes. For example, in some embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may not include a GPS sensor as opposed to an alternative embodiment in which the fitness tracking device 100 may include a GPS sensor. In the case where the fitness tracking device 100 may not include a GPS sensor, a GPS sensor of the companion device 300 may collect GPS location information, and the fitness tracking device 100 may receive the GPS location information via interface module 240 (FIG. 2) from the companion device 300.


In another example, the fitness tracking device 100 may not include an altimeter, as opposed to an alternative embodiment in which the fitness tracking device 100 may include an altimeter. In the case where the fitness tracking device 100 may not include an altimeter or barometer, an altimeter or barometer of the companion device 300 may collect altitude or relative altitude information, and the fitness tracking device 100 may receive the altitude or relative altitude information via interface module 240 (FIG. 2) from the companion device 300.


In various embodiments, fitness tracking device 100 may use motion data, such as accelerometer or gyroscope data, to determine if a user is engaging in a constrained-arm activity and/or if the user is pushing an object across a surface. In certain embodiments, fitness tracking device 100 may calculate one or more features of interest from motion data and use such features to detect the aforementioned usages. Non-limiting examples of features that may be used include pose angle, accelerometer energy, and step cadence.


As used herein, “pose angle” refers to an angle of the user's arm with respect to the horizon. In some embodiments, pose angle may be estimated using techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,526,430, entitled “Method and System to Estimate Day-Long Calorie Expenditure Based on Posture,” which his hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the fitness tracking device 100 may be embodied as a smartwatch, and pose angle may be determined as an angle between the watch's crown and the horizon.


Accelerometer energy (or “signal energy”) may be measured using a norm-2 metric. The energy calculation can occur in either time or frequency domains. In the time domain, accelerometer energy can be calculated as the variance over a window of accelerometer samples over one or more axes. In the frequency domain, accelerometer energy can be calculated by selecting a certain frequency range to calculate the accelerometer signal energy, particularly by summing the squared value of the frequency bins of an FFT for one or more axes.


The user's step cadence may be obtained from a motion sensor or otherwise calculated from motion sensor data. In some embodiments, step cadence may be determined using techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2015/0088006, entitled “Method for determining aerobic capacity,” which his hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.



FIG. 4 is a diagram 400 showing a fitness tracking device 100 being used with a constrained arm. In this example, user 402 is carrying an object 406 (e.g., a beverage) with an arm 404, and has a fitness tracking device 100 attached to the same arm 404. While ambulatory, the user 402 may purposefully constrain movement of arm 404 to prevent the object 406 from tipping or otherwise being displaced.



FIG. 5 is a diagram 500 illustrating another constrained-arm scenario. User 402 may wear a fitness tracking device 100 on the same arm 404 used to push an object 502 across a surface 502. In the example of FIG. 5, the object is shown as a stroller 502, however the present disclosure is applicable to other types of objects that may be pushed across a surface, such as a shopping carriage, a walker, etc. As the user pushes the object 502, the interaction between the object 502 and the surface 504 may produce vibrations or other disturbances that are detected as relatively high-frequency accelerometer energy by the fitness tracking device 100. In the case of a stroller or other wheeled object 502, the high-frequency energy may result from an interaction between wheels 506 (and/or a suspension system coupled thereto) and the surface 504. The accelerometer may detect both high-frequency energy from the object being pushed, and relatively low-frequency energy (“pedestrian band energy”) from the user's motion. In certain embodiments, accelerometer energy from the object being pushed has frequency greater than 20 Hz and accelerometer energy from user's motion may have a frequency less than 4 Hz.


Referring to FIG. 6, a graph 600 illustrates pose angle (shown along the horizontal axis) and accelerometer energy (shown along the vertical axis) for different scenarios in which a user is wearing a fitness tracking device on an arm. Pose angle may be defined as the angle between the forearm and the horizon, and may be computed in real-time using accelerometer data as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,526,430, entitled “Method and System to Estimate Day-Long Calorie Expenditure Based on Posture.” If the arm is not constrained, pose angle may tend to be in the range −90° to −45° as the user walks, jogs, or runs. However, if the user's arm is constrained (e.g., as a result of holding or pushing an object), pose angle may tend to be in the range −45° to +45°.


Within the illustrative graph 600, region 602 may correspond to a scenario where the user is walking at a normal speed with the arm unconstrained; region 604 to a scenario where the user is walking at a relatively fast speed (e.g., speed walking) with the arm unconstrained; region 606 to a scenario where the user is walking at a relatively slow speed with the arm unconstrained; and region 608 to a scenario where the user's arm is constrained. As can be seen in the figure, using pose angle on its own may be insufficient to differentiate between speed walkers 604 and constrained-arm usage 608. Likewise, using accelerometer energy on its own may be insufficient to differentiate between slow walkers 606 and a constrained-arm usage 608. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present disclosure use at least two different features (e.g., pose angle and accelerometer energy) to detect that the arm onto which the fitness tracking device is attached is constrained. In particular embodiments, constrained-arm usage may be detected if pose angle is greater than about −45° and accelerometer energy is less than about 0.25 g2.


Typically, a fitness tracking device may use accelerometer energy to estimate the user's stride length. However, if the user's arm is constrained, accelerometer energy may decrease (as illustrated by region 608), which in turn may result in the stride length being underestimated. Thus, in some embodiments, when a constrained-arm condition is detected, stride length may be estimated using historical step cadence-to-stride length data.



FIG. 7 shows a graph 700 illustrating historical step cadence-to-stride length data. According to biomechanics, step cadence and stride length are related. Each point in the graph 700 may correspond to a step cadence-to stride length pair that was previously measured or otherwise collected for a user. For example, point 702 may indicate that, during some time epoch, a user averaged 63 steps per minute with an average stride length of about 0.48 meters. Multiple pairs collected for the same user may be plotted and interpolated to generate a curve. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, a first curve 704 may correspond to stride data measured for a first user, and a second curve 706 may correspond to stride data measured for a second user. The user's stride length can be estimated by finding a point on the historical data curve corresponding to a currently measured step cadence.


Step cadence and stride length data may be collected by, and stored within, the user's own fitness tracking device as part of a calibration process. If a constrained-arm is subsequently detected, the stored calibration data may be used to estimate stride length based on currently measured step cadence. If such calibration data is not available, historical step cadence-to-stride length data from a general population of users may be used instead. Such general population data may be configured within the fitness tracking device and/or a companion device. Estimating stride length using historical step cadence-length data may allow the fitness tracking device to provide accurate fitness data (e.g., distance, speed, caloric expenditure, and exercise time) even during constrained-arm usage.


Referring to FIG. 8, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a “road noise” feature may be used detect when the user is pushing an object (e.g., a stroller) across a surface. Road noise may be defined as the ratio of high-frequency energy to low-frequency energy experienced by an accelerometer, where “low” frequency may correspond to a bandwidth of energy produced during typical pedestrian motion, and “high” frequency may correspond to a bandwidth above the pedestrian band. In some embodiments, high-frequency energy is defined as energy having a frequency greater than 20 Hz, and low-frequency energy is defined as energy having a frequency below 4 Hz.



FIG. 8 shows a graph 800 illustrating pose angle (horizontal axis) versus road noise (vertical axis) for two scenarios in which the user has a fitness tracking device attached to an arm. Data points generally below line 802 may correspond to a scenario where a user's arm is constrained but not being used to push an object, whereas data points generally above line 802 may correspond to a scenario where the user is pushing a stroller or other object across a surface using the arm. As can be seen in the example of FIG. 8, in the case where the user's arm is pushing an object, the amount of road noise may be increased and more concentrated (in terms of pose angle) relative to when the arm is not pushing an object. Accordingly, in some embodiments, it may be detected that the user is pushing an object when road noise is above a predetermined threshold (e.g., 10−1). In certain embodiments, only road noise within a certain range of pose angles (e.g., −45° to 0°) is considered when detecting if the user is pushing an object across a surface.


In response to detecting that the user is pushing an object, an increased load may be estimated and used to calculate more accurate fitness data (e.g., more accurate caloric expenditure and/or exercise time information). In one embodiment, the increased load may be estimated based on the weight and mechanics of a typical stroller. The increased load may be determined experimentally and configured within the fitness tracking device. Using the above described technique, a fitness tracking device may account for the extra work performed by a user when pushing a stroller or other object without requiring, for example, a heart rate sensor that could measure the increased load more directly.


Referring to FIG. 9, a method 900 may be used to improve the accuracy of fitness data in the case where a user is wearing a fitness tracking device on an arm that is constrained. At block 902, motion data is collected using one or more motion sensors, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, and/or GPS receiver. At block 904, the motion data is used to detect that the user's arm is constrained. In some embodiments, a constrained arm is detected using both a pose angle feature and an accelerometer energy feature. At block 906, the user's stride length is estimated using the motion data and historical step cadence-to-stride length data. The historical data may correspond to data collected for the user as part of a calibration process, or may correspond to data for a general population of users. At block 908, fitness data, such as distance, speed, caloric expenditure, and exercise minutes, is calculated using the estimated stride length. At block 910, the fitness data is output, for example, to a display module.


Referring to FIG. 10, a method 1000 may improve the accuracy of fitness data in the case where a user is user is pushing an object (e.g., a stroller) across a surface. At block 1002 and 1004, motion data is collected and used to detect that the user is pushing an object across a surface. In some embodiments, the detection includes using a road noise feature defined in terms of high and low frequency accelerometer energy. At block 1006, an estimate is made of the increased load due to the object being pushed. In one embodiment, the increased load may be estimated based on the weight and mechanics of a typical stroller. At block 1008, fitness data may be calculated taking into account the estimated increased load. At block 1010, the fitness data is output, for example, to a display module.


Methods described herein may represent processing that occurs within a fitness tracking (e.g., device 100 of FIG. 1) and/or within a companion device (e.g., device 300 of FIG. 3). The subject matter described herein can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structural means disclosed in this specification and structural equivalents thereof, or in combinations of them. The subject matter described herein can be implemented as one or more computer program products, such as one or more computer programs tangibly embodied in an information carrier (e.g., in a machine readable storage device), or embodied in a propagated signal, for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus (e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers). A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.


The processes and logic flows described in this specification, including the method steps of the subject matter described herein, can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions of the subject matter described herein by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus of the subject matter described herein can be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).


Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processor of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. Information carriers suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory device, or magnetic disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.


It is to be understood that the disclosed subject matter is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The disclosed subject matter is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the disclosed subject matter. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosed subject matter.


Although the disclosed subject matter has been described and illustrated in the foregoing exemplary embodiments, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of implementation of the disclosed subject matter may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: collecting motion data using a motion sensor worn on an arm of a user;calculating using the motion data, by a processor circuit in communication with the motion sensor, a pose angle of the arm of the user;detecting based on the pose angle and the motion data, by the processor circuit in communication with the motion sensor, an indication that the arm is constrained;in response to the detecting, estimating, by the processor circuit, a stride length of the user, the estimating comprising detecting a step cadence indicated by the motion data and selecting a historical stride length from historical step cadence-to-stride length data that matches the detected step cadence indicated by the motion data as the stride length;calculating, by the processor circuit, fitness data using the estimated stride length; andoutputting the fitness data to the user.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the calculating the fitness data comprises calculating at least one of distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, or exercise time.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the detecting, based on the pose angle and the motion data, the indication that the arm is constrained comprises: determining an accelerometer energy based on the motion data; anddetecting that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle and the accelerometer energy.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the detecting that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle and the accelerometer energy comprises detecting that the arm is constrained when the pose angle is within a predetermined range of pose angles.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the predetermined range of pose angles corresponds to pose angles greater than −45°.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the estimating the stride length of the user comprises: obtaining a plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs;interpolating the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs to generate a curve; andfinding a point on the curve corresponding to a measured step cadence of the user.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the obtaining the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs comprises obtaining calibration data for the user.
  • 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the obtaining the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs comprises obtaining data for a general population of users.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 comprising: detecting, by the processor circuit, that the user is pushing an object across a surface based on the motion data; andestimating, by the processor circuit, an increased load due to the object being pushed,wherein the calculating the fitness data comprises calculating the fitness data based on the estimated increased load.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 where the detecting that the user is pushing the object across the surface comprises: calculating, by the processor circuit, road noise as a ratio of accelerometer data within a first frequency band to accelerometer energy within a second frequency band; andcomparing, by the processor circuit, the road noise to a threshold value.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the first frequency band comprises frequencies above 20 Hz and the second frequency band comprises frequencies below 4 Hz.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the motion sensor comprises an accelerometer or a gyroscope.
  • 13. A system comprising: a motion sensor configured to be located on an appendage of a user and configured to collect motion data; anda processor circuit coupled to the motion sensor and configured to execute instructions causing the processor circuit to: calculate, using the motion data, a pose angle of an arm of the user;detect, based on the pose angle and the motion data, an indication that the arm is constrained;in response to detecting the indication that the arm is constrained, estimate a stride length of the user, the estimating comprising detecting a step cadence indicated by the motion data and selecting a historical stride length from historical step cadence-to-stride length data that matches the detected step cadence indicated by the motion data as the stride length;calculate fitness data using the estimated stride length; andoutput the fitness data to the user.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to calculate at least one of distance traveled, speed, caloric expenditure, or exercise time.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the instructions cause the processor circuit to detect, based on the pose angle and the motion data, the indication that the arm is constrained by causing the processor to: determine an accelerometer energy based on the motion data; anddetect that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle and the accelerometer energy.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to detect that the arm is constrained based on the pose angle and the accelerometer energy when the pose angle is within a predetermined range of pose angles.
  • 17. The system of claim 16 wherein the predetermined range of pose angles corresponds to pose angles greater than −45°.
  • 18. The system of claim 13 wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to: obtain a plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs;interpolate the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs to generate a curve; andestimate the stride length of the user by finding a point on the curve corresponding to a measured step cadence of the user.
  • 19. The system of claim 18 wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to obtain the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs from calibration data for the user.
  • 20. The system of claim 18 wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to obtain the plurality of step cadence-to-stride length pairs from data for a general population of users.
  • 21. The system of claim 13 wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to: detect that the user is pushing an object across a surface based on the motion data; andestimate an increased load due to the object being pushed,wherein the instructions further cause the processor circuit to calculate the fitness data based on the estimated increased load.
  • 22. The system of claim 13, wherein the motion sensor comprises an accelerometer or a gyroscope.
US Referenced Citations (211)
Number Name Date Kind
4566461 Lubell et al. Jan 1986 A
5158093 Shvartz et al. Oct 1992 A
5663897 Geiser Sep 1997 A
5664499 Kingsmill Sep 1997 A
6013008 Fukushima Jan 2000 A
6059724 Campell et al. May 2000 A
6582380 Kazlausky et al. Jun 2003 B2
6687535 Hautala et al. Feb 2004 B2
6837827 Lee et al. Jan 2005 B1
6868338 Elliott Mar 2005 B1
7254516 Case, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B2
7311675 Peifer et al. Dec 2007 B2
7377180 Cunningham May 2008 B2
7387029 Cunningham Jun 2008 B2
7467060 Kulach et al. Dec 2008 B2
7534206 Lovitt et al. May 2009 B1
7647196 Kahn et al. Jan 2010 B2
7690556 Kahn et al. Apr 2010 B1
7771320 Riley et al. Aug 2010 B2
7805149 Werner et al. Sep 2010 B2
7841967 Kahn et al. Nov 2010 B1
8290480 Abramson et al. Oct 2012 B2
8483775 Buck et al. Jul 2013 B2
8531180 Piemonte et al. Sep 2013 B2
8589174 Nelson et al. Nov 2013 B2
8638320 Harley et al. Jan 2014 B2
8653956 Berkobin et al. Feb 2014 B2
8784271 Brumback et al. Jul 2014 B2
8890854 Tenuta et al. Nov 2014 B2
8892391 Tu et al. Nov 2014 B2
8894576 Alwan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8911329 Lin et al. Dec 2014 B2
8928635 Harley et al. Jan 2015 B2
9195305 Markovic et al. Nov 2015 B2
9264862 Tu et al. Feb 2016 B2
9413871 Nixon et al. Aug 2016 B2
9448250 Pham et al. Sep 2016 B2
9526430 Srinivas et al. Dec 2016 B2
9788794 Le Boeuf et al. Oct 2017 B2
9918646 Alvarado et al. Mar 2018 B2
9998864 Kumar et al. Jun 2018 B2
10098549 Tan et al. Oct 2018 B2
10154789 Raghuram et al. Dec 2018 B2
10188347 Self et al. Jan 2019 B2
10206627 Le Boeuf et al. Feb 2019 B2
10219708 Altini Mar 2019 B2
10244948 Pham et al. Apr 2019 B2
10290260 Wisbey et al. May 2019 B2
10292606 Wisbey et al. May 2019 B2
10512406 Martinez et al. Dec 2019 B2
10524670 Raghuram et al. Jan 2020 B2
10620232 Tu et al. Apr 2020 B2
10687707 Tan et al. Jun 2020 B2
10687752 Pham et al. Jun 2020 B2
10694994 Alvarado et al. Jun 2020 B2
10699594 Mermel et al. Jun 2020 B2
10617912 Narasimha Rao et al. Jul 2020 B2
10709933 Tan et al. Jul 2020 B2
20010022828 Pyles Sep 2001 A1
20020019585 Dickinson Feb 2002 A1
20030032460 Cannon et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030138763 Roncalez et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040064061 Nissila Apr 2004 A1
20050107723 Wehman et al. May 2005 A1
20050124906 Childre et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050212701 Nimmo Sep 2005 A1
20060064277 Jung et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060136173 Case et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060190217 Lee et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060217231 Parks et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070100666 Stivoric et al. May 2007 A1
20070150229 Fujiwara Jun 2007 A1
20070219059 Schwartz et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070275825 O'Brien Nov 2007 A1
20070276271 Chan Nov 2007 A1
20080096726 Riley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080214360 Stirling et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090009320 O'Connor et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024332 Karlov et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090043531 Kahn et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090063099 Counts et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090240461 Makino Sep 2009 A1
20090319221 Kahn et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100030350 House et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100130890 Matsumura et al. May 2010 A1
20100184564 Molyneux et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204952 Irlam et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100210953 Sholder et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100210975 Anthony, III et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217099 Leboeuf et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100274102 Teixeira Oct 2010 A1
20100298656 McCombie et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110040193 Seppanen et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054359 Sazonov et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082008 Cheung et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110131012 Czaja et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152695 Granqvist et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110195707 Faerber et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110238485 Haumont et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110301436 Teixeira Dec 2011 A1
20120006112 Lee Jan 2012 A1
20120083715 Friedman Apr 2012 A1
20120172677 Beith Jul 2012 A1
20120238832 Hwang Sep 2012 A1
20120296455 Ohnemus et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120322621 Bingham et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130023739 Russel Jan 2013 A1
20130041590 Burich et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130053990 Ackland Feb 2013 A1
20130085861 Dunlap Apr 2013 A1
20130096943 Carey et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130135097 Doezema May 2013 A1
20130158686 Zhang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130178335 Lin et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130197377 Takahiko et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218053 Kaiser et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130267794 Fernstrom et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140071082 Singh et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140073486 Ahmed et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087708 Kalita et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088444 Saalasti et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140107932 Luna Apr 2014 A1
20140109390 Manning Apr 2014 A1
20140121471 Walker May 2014 A1
20140167973 Letchner et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172238 Craine Jun 2014 A1
20140172361 Chiang Jun 2014 A1
20140197946 Park et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140200906 Bentley et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207264 Quy Jul 2014 A1
20140213920 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140221854 Wai Aug 2014 A1
20140228649 Rayner et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140244071 Czaja et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140266789 Matus Sep 2014 A1
20140276127 Ferdosi et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278139 Hong Sep 2014 A1
20140278229 Hong et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140316305 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140348367 Vavrus et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150087929 Rapoport et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088006 Rapoport et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150100141 Hughes Apr 2015 A1
20150105096 Chowdhury et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119728 Blackadar et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150147734 Flores et al. May 2015 A1
20150148632 Benaron May 2015 A1
20150182149 Rapoport et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150250417 Cheng et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150256689 Erkkila et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150260514 Menelas et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150327804 Lefever et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150328523 Heling et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150338926 Park et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150345985 Fung et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150357948 Goldstein Dec 2015 A1
20150374240 Lee Dec 2015 A1
20160021238 Abramson et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160054449 Pekonen et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160057372 Raghuram et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058302 Raghuram et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058329 Srinivas et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058332 Tan et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058333 Arnold et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058356 Raghuram et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058370 Raghuram et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058371 Singh Alvarado et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160058372 Raghuram et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160059079 Watterson Mar 2016 A1
20160084869 Yuen et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160147319 Agarwal et al. May 2016 A1
20160166178 Fuss et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160170998 Frank et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160206248 Sartor et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160242646 Obma Aug 2016 A1
20160256058 Pham et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160269572 Erkkila et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287177 Huppert et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160314633 Bonanni et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160361020 LeBoeuf et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160363449 Metzler et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160374614 Cavallaro et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170007166 Roover et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170061817 Mettler May Mar 2017 A1
20170074897 Mermel et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170082649 Tu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170094450 Tu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170111768 Smith et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170181644 Meer et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170188893 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170202486 Martikka et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170211936 Howell et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170242499 Shah et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170242500 Shah et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170251972 Jayaraman et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170259116 Mestas Sep 2017 A1
20170269734 Graff Sep 2017 A1
20170269785 Abdollahian et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170273619 Alvarado et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170347885 Tan et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367658 LeBoeuf et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180028863 Matsuda Feb 2018 A1
20180049694 Singh Alvarado et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180050235 Tan et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180055375 Martinez et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180055439 Pham et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180056123 Narasimha Rao et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180056128 Narasimha Rao et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180056129 Narasimha Rao et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180279914 Patek et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190076063 Kent et al. Mar 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
2008100295 May 2008 AU
102481479 May 2012 CN
104218976 Dec 2014 CN
105031905 Nov 2015 CN
105068656 Nov 2015 CN
2465824 Jun 2010 GB
259KOL2015 Dec 2015 IN
2010-051333 Mar 2010 JP
2013-039316 Feb 2013 JP
2014-042757 Mar 2014 JP
2016-150018 Aug 2016 JP
2018-000543 Jan 2018 JP
2018-015187 Feb 2018 JP
122807 Feb 2010 RO
0361779 Jul 2003 WO
2010090867 Aug 2010 WO
2011105914 Sep 2011 WO
2015126182 Aug 2015 WO
2015200900 Dec 2015 WO
2016044831 Mar 2016 WO
2016073620 May 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/047290, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 14 pages.
KINprof, May 31, 2011, Predictive VO2max tests, Web Video, Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9e3HcY1sm8.
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2017/049693, International Search Report dated Aug. 12, 2017, 3 pages.
Novatel, “IMU Error and Their Effects”, Novatel Application Notes APN-064 Rev A p. 1-6, Feb. 21, 2014.
Le, et al., “Sensor-based Training Optimization of a Cyclist Group”, Seventh International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, IEEE 2007, pp. 265-270.
Yamaji, et al., “Relationship Between Heart Rate and Relative Oxygen Intake in Male Subjects Aged 10 to 27 Years”, J. Human Ergol., 7:29-39, Jan. 27, 1978.
Your Fitness FAQ, Why is it important to warm up and cool down in a workout?, 2012, Web, Retrieved from: http://www.yourfitnessfaq.com/whyisitimportanttowarmupandcooldowninaworkout.html.
Vella et al, Exercise After-Burn: Research Update, 2005, Web, Retrieved from: http://www.unm.edu/˜lkravitz/Article%20folder/epocarticle.html.
Song et al., “Training Activity Recognition Systems Online Using Real-Time Crowdsourcing”, University of Rochester Computer Science, UbiCom' 12, Sep. 5-8, 2012 (2 pages).
Rowlands et al., “Assessing Sedentary Behavior with the GENEActiv: Introducing the Sedentary Sphere”. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 46.6 (2014): 1235-1247.
Hasson et al., “Accuracy of four resting metabolic rate production equations: Effects of sex, body mass index, age, and race/ethnicity”, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2011, vol. 14, p. 344-351.
Lucas et al., “Mechanisms of orthostatic intolerance following very prolonged exercise”, 2008, J Appl Physiol, 105: 213-225.
Kunze et al., “Where am i: Recognizing on-body positions of wearable sensors.” Location- and context-awareness. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. 264-275.
Keytel et al., “Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exercise”, 2005, Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(3):289-97.
Sabatini, Kalman-filter-based orientation determination using inertial/magnetic sensors: observability analysis and performance evaluation, Sep. 27, 2011, Sensors 2011, 11, 9182-9206.
Jackson et al., “Prediction of functional aerobic capacity without exercise testing”, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22(6), 863-870, 1990.
Isaacs et al., “Modeling energy expenditure and oxygen consumption in human exposure models: accounting for fatigue and EPOC”, 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 18: 289-298.
Human Kinetics, Aerobic Workout Components, 2011, Web, Retrieved from: http://www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/aerobicworkoutcomponentsexcerpt.
Gao et al., “Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems.” Medical engineering & physics 36.6 (2014): 779-785.
Frankenfield et al., “Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate in Healthy Nonobese and Obese adults: A systematic review”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. May 2005, vol. 105, No. 5, p. 775-789.
Chu, “In-Vehicle Driver Detection Using Mobile Phone Sensors”, Submitted for Graduation with departmental Distinction in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Apr. 20, 2011, pp. 1-21.
Bo et al., “TEXIVE: Detecting Drivers Using Personal Smart Phones by Leveraging Inertial Sensors”, Department of Computer Science, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago IL, Dec. 7, 2014, pp. 1-12.
Brooks, G.A. et al., “Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and Its Applications,” Fourth Edition, McGraw Hill, ISBN 0-07-255642-0, Chapter 2: Bioenergetics, Chapter 10: Metabolic Response to Exercise: Lactate Metabolism During Exercise and Recovery, Excess Postexercise O2 Consumption (EPOC), O2 Deficit, O2 Debt, and the Anaerobic Threshold, Chapter 16: Cardiovascular Dynamics During Exercise, Chapter 21: Principles of Endurance Conditioning, Chapter 27: Exercise Testing and Prescription, 141 pages (2004).
Noakes, Timothy D., “Lore of Running,” Fourth Edition, Human Kinetics, Chapter 2: Oxygen Transport and Running Economy, Chapter 3: Energy Systems and Running Performance, 157 pages (2002).
Rapoport, Benjamin I., “Metabolic Factors Limiting Performance in Marathon Runners,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, Issue 10, 13 pages (Oct. 2010).
Tanaka, H. et al., “Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 37, Issue 1, pp. 153-156 (Jan. 2001).
Wang, L. et al., “Time constant of heart rate recovery after low level exercise as a useful measure of cardiovascular fitness,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 1, pp. 1799-1802 (2006).
Kyle, Chester R., “Reduction of Wind Resistance and Power Output of Racing Cyclists and Runners Travelling in Groups”, Ergonomics, vol. 22, No. 4, 1979, pp. 387-397.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/015,912, filed Sep. 9, 2020, Humblet et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/015,965, filed Sep. 9, 2020, Dervisoglu et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/016,020, filed Sep. 9, 2020, Ochs et al.
Alexander, “Energetics and Optimization of Human Walking and Running,” Am J Human Biology, Mar. 20, 2002, 14:641-648.
Lasecki, “Real-Time Crowd Labeling for Deployable Activity Recognition,” University of Rochester Computer Science, Feb. 23, 2013, 10 pages.
Latt et al., “Walking speed, cadence and step length are selected to optimize the stability of head and pelvis accelerations,” Experimental Brain Research, Aug. 24, 2007, 184: 201-209.
Morgan et al., “Effect of step length optimization on the aerobic demand of running,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 1994, 245-251.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Appln. No. PCT/US2017/049693, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 8 pages.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Appln. No. PCT/US2018/047290, dated Mar. 17, 2020, 9 pages.
Pfitzinger.com “Optimal Marathon Training Sessions, Distance Coach.com, Intelligent Training for Distance Runners,” archived May 15, 2012, <https://web.archive.org/web/20120515081237/http://www.pfitzinger .com/marathontraining.shtml>, printed Jan. 20, 2017, 3 pages.
Romijn et al., “Regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration,” Am. J. Physiol., 1993, 6:1-13.
Triendurance.com “Running with a Higher Cadence, Triendurance,” Oct. 23, 2021, retrieved from <https ://web. archive.org/web/20080228162904/http ://www.trienduranee .com/Related. asp?PageID=14&NavID=7>, 2 pages.
Bruce, R.A. et al., “Exercising testing in adult normal subjects and cardiac patients,” Pediatrics, vol. 32, No. Suppl., pp. 742-756 (Oct. 1963).
Bruce, R.A. et al., “Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease,” American Heart Journal, vol. 85, Issue 4, pp. 546-562 (Apr. 1973).
Burke, Edmund R., “High-Tech Cycling,” Second Edition, Human Kinetics, Chapter 4: Optimizing the Crank Cycle and Pedaling Cadence, Chapter 5: Cycling Biomechanics, Chapter 6: Cycling Power, Chapter 10: Physiology of Professional Road Cycling, Chapter 11: Physiology of Mountain Biking, 131 pages (2003).
Cavanagh, P.R. et al., “The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 30-35 (1982).
Earnest, C.P. et al., “Cross-sectional association between maximal estimated cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic syndrome for men and women in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study,” Mayo Clin Proceedings, vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 259-270, 20 pages (Mar. 2013).
Fox, S.M. et al., “Physical Activity and the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease,” Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med., vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 950-967 (Aug. 1968).
Glass, S., et al., “ACSM's Metabolic Calculations Handbook,” Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 124 pages (2007).
Lavie, C.J. et al., “Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 251-258 (Mar. 2013).
Margaria, R. et al., “Energy cost of running,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 367-370 (Mar. 1, 1963).
Myers, J. et al., “Exercise Capacity and Mortality Among Men Referred for Exercise Testing,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, No. 11, pp. 793-801 (Mar. 14, 2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180344217 A1 Dec 2018 US