Patent Grant
10928153
This disclosure relates to a firearm configuration. More specifically, the present invention relates to a fixed barrel firing mechanism that reduces recoil, both perceived and actual.
Recent technological advances have led to increasingly more powerful firearms and handgun cartridges. One resulting complaint is that weapons firing these more powerful cartridges tend to demonstrate higher wear compared to identical weapon models firing older, less powerful cartridges. This is particularly evident in semiautomatic handguns in the area of the frame where the slide impacts at the end of the recoil stroke. This is the result of the slide moving violently to the rear and then being stopped by the frame before the next phase of the recoil stroke is undertaken (i.e. the propulsion of the slide forward by the recoil spring to strip a fresh cartridge out of the magazine and seat it in the chamber of the barrel). This condition of excessive wear in the frame area impacted by the slide is called frame battering.
Frame battering is exacerbated by the construction of most modern semiautomatic handguns, which leaves very little surface area on the frame to bear the transfer of force from the slide during impact. To make matters worse, many modern semiautomatic handguns are constructed with frames composed of less durable materials than traditional carbon or stainless steel. For instance, many firearms are now constructed from less durable materials such as aluminums or polymers. Though such materials offer weight savings for the frame component and thus the weapon as a whole, conditions conducive to frame battering are increased and higher wear is again realized. Indeed, frame battering in the Glock□ series of handguns (which utilize polymer frames) has been commonly recognized in the industry. In response, the manufacturer now includes steel rail inserts closer to the area of the frame under the slide impact so that if the polymer frame material disintegrates, further degradation can be halted.
Though such a solution functions to halt further frame degradation, it does not address the root of the problem. The present invention addresses the problem by modifying the traditional handgun configuration. More specifically, the guide rod is moved to a lower position in front of the trigger. As a result, the frame gains a significant amount of surface area in the area subject to slide impact. The area of the rear of the slide which impacts the frame is likewise increased substantially. This is advantageous because it increases the surface area for absorbing forces imparted by the slide striking the frame during the recoil stroke. The increased surface area necessarily reduces wear in this area.
Handguns have grown increasingly more powerful over the years. As caliber size increases, so does the recoil of the firearm. Recoil is the rearward momentum generated by a firearm upon firing. Large caliber firearms generally create a substantial recoil impulse upon firing, which may cause the weapon to be forced upward due to an imbalance of forces. Unless properly adjusted for by the user, the recoil of a firearm may cause the user to fire inaccurately and miss the intended target. This is especially the case when firing in a fully automatic mode, as in a machine pistol.
This problem is a result of physics. The mass and velocity of a projectile must exert an equal and opposite reaction in the system behind it. This relationship is defined as “free recoil” in the firearm industry. Free recoil, in turn, results in muzzle rise. Muzzle rise is defined as the immediate, post-fire angular velocity of the firearm about its center of force. The center of force is determined by both the user's hand pressure across the grip and the handgun's own center of mass.
For the foregoing reasons, efforts have been made over the years to reduce the amount of recoil generated by a firearm. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,297 to Lakatos discloses a firearm recoil reduction method. The method employs a spring, a trigger housing and a barrel. Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,388,855 to Sokolovsky discloses a firearm pneumatic slide decelerator assembly. The assembly includes a recoil spring in proximity to a trigger housing. U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,110 to Menck discloses an impact buffering recoil mechanism. The mechanism includes a recoil spring in proximity to a trigger housing.
Although each of these inventions achieves its own individual objective, none of the background art relates to a mechanism for lessening recoil by lowering a firearm's center of mass. The firearm configuration described herein is aimed at overcoming these and other shortcomings noted in the background art.
The disclosed system has several important advantages. For example, the disclosed firearm configuration reduces the recoil encountered by the user.
A further possible advantage is that recoil forces are reduced by lowering the firearm's center of reciprocating mass. A manufacturer may further reduce recoil by overweighting the reciprocating mass in line with the hand past what is necessary for basic structural integrity.
Still yet another possible advantage of the present system is to lower the axis along which recoil forces are generated to thereby lessen the associated torque and to greatly reduce frame battering.
Another advantage of the present system is to improve the user's capacity for accuracy by reducing recoil. Higher recoil forces disrupt most firearm users' concentration and inflame something akin to the “fight or flight” instinct, so less recoil equals less psychological disruption, which in turn promotes the users' capacity for accurate fire. This increase in accuracy via reduced recoil is most pronounced in the application of this system to a machine pistol format, as such weapons are generally less controllable due to their light weight, comparatively meager grip surface area, and high rate of fire in full automatic mode.
Another advantage is realized by moving the guide rod down and in front of the trigger, thereby increasing the amount of surface area in the region impacted by the slide during firing and utilizing a firearm configuration that allows the manufacturer to integrate the recoil spring guide rod with the frame, resulting in fewer parts and lowering manufacturing costs. This also has the beneficial result of simplified disassembly procedures for the end user and increased reliability of the weapon.
A further advantage is that the firearm configuration of the present disclosure decreases overall weapon height with no appreciable reduction in magazine capacity as compared to known designs. Alternatively, the present configuration can result in a weapon of equal height to known designs, but with an increased magazine capacity.
A further advantage of the present system is that it allows a user to execute quicker follow-up shots, as the recoil forces impeding faster shots will be reduced.
The firearm configuration of the present disclosure also reduces the recoil of a given cartridge, which allows more powerful ammunition to be utilized with approximately the same recoil as a conventional configuration. The use of more powerful ammunition, in turn, allows for a flatter bullet trajectory and thus increased effective range of a handgun. Also, the ability to use more powerful ammunition with the same recoil allows for the use of larger-caliber armor-penetrating bullets, resulting in increased lethality and effectiveness on the battlefield.
Another advantage is that the system provides for a lower barrel axis when combined with a rotating barrel locking mechanism, further reducing recoil.
Another advantage is to increase the surface area impacted by the slide during firing, thereby distributing the resulting forces throughout the firearm.
Still yet another advantage is to more widely distribute impact forces generated during firing, thereby allowing the firearm to be constructed of less durable, but lighter weight materials.
The advantages of the present system may be further maximized by using any or all of the following additional design elements: use of a sliding trigger assembly, use of a striker firing mechanism, or use of external or “slide in frame” guide rails.
A further advantage of the present system is that it may be configured to eliminate the snag or catch point located at the front corner of the trigger guard, thereby making the action of holstering or unholstering the weapon easier.
Various embodiments of the invention may have none, some, or all of these advantages. Other technical advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its advantages, reference is now made to the following descriptions, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Similar reference numerals refer to similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
The present disclosure relates to a firearm configuration for a handgun. The firearm configuration is designed to reduce the recoil forces encountered by a user upon firing the weapon. Recoil forces are reduced by lowering the firearm's center of mass and by aligning a recoil plate that absorbs forces generated by the slide during firing and recoil mass which aligns with the user's arm and trigger finger. The various details of the present disclosure, and the manner in which they interrelate, will be described in greater detail hereinafter.
With reference now to
Configuration (10) further includes a lower housing (26) that is slidably interconnected to the upper housing (14). A trigger (28) and trigger assembly (32) are positioned within the lower housing (26). The disclosed trigger (28) is a pivoting trigger, but sliding triggers can also be used in connection with the present invention. The depicted trigger (28) and trigger assembly (32) are of the type found in the Glock® series of handguns, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 8,156,677, and are of a standard and well known construction. In accordance with the invention, trigger (28) pivots about a second axis (34). Second axis (34) is positioned below, and is perpendicular to, the first axis (24). The trigger assembly (32) is interconnected to the striker assembly (18). As is known in the art, ammunition (38) is delivered upwardly from the magazine (36) under a spring force into the upper housing (14). Individual cartridges to be fired are delivered between the barrel (16) and the firing assembly (18). Trigger assembly (32) is used to selectively actuate the striker assembly (18) and fire the firearm (12). The relationship between trigger assembly (32) and striker assembly (18) will be appreciated to those of ordinary skill in the art. The exact mechanism employed does not form part of the present invention and can be similar to that utilized by the type found in the Glock® series of handguns.
Lower housing (26) further includes a guide rod (42) and recoil spring (44) that extend through the opening in the recoil mass (22). Recoil spring (44) has an end seated within recoil mass (22). Guide rod (42) is positioned along a third axis (46). The third axis (46) is positioned below the second axis (34). Guide rod (42) is integral with the lower housing (26).
In accordance with the present disclosure, when a user fires firearm (12), the upper housing (14) slides back with respect to the lower housing (26). This action, in turn, causes the recoil mass (22) to slide along the guide rod (42) to compress the recoil spring (44). The recoil generated by firearm (12) is greatly reduced by the position and movement of the recoil mass (22). More specifically, the axis of the recoil spring (44)—i.e. the third axis (46)—is parallel to and below the first axis (24), which is an axis drawn down the centerline of the barrel (16) prior to the firing of the weapon, and upon which the bullet exits the barrel. In this regard, the first and third axes (24) and (46) remain parallel to each other at all times during firing. As a result, the linear momentum generated by ammunition (38) leaving barrel (16) is completely countered by the linear momentum of the recoil mass (22) moving towards trigger (28). In other words, ammunition (38) leaving barrel (16) travels on a vector that is 180 degrees from the vector of the recoil mass (22). The positioning of recoil mass (22) below barrel (16) and striker assembly (18) also effectively lowers the center of mass of the overall firearm (12). In the preferred embodiment, the center of mass is in alignment with the recoil spring (44) (see
Recoil is further reduced by positioning the axis of trigger (28)—i.e. the second axis (34)—in close proximity (i.e. approximately 1 inch or less) to the first axis (24). This ensures that the recoil mass (22) is in alignment with the user's trigger finger and/or arm upon firing. Computer modeling of the claimed invention demonstrates that a recoil mass of approximately 0.38 lbs., located approximately 3.1 inches forward of, and approximately 0.5 inches beneath, the center of force greatly reduced the associated muzzle rise. Specifically, the modeling showed that about 22% more free recoil was absorbed as compared to a conventional firearm. Likewise, muzzle rise was reduced by approximately 59%.
A second embodiment of the firearm (12) is illustrated in
At its most basic, this reconfiguration takes the guide rod (42) from being a passive part in the recoil cycle to an active part of the recoil cycle, making the resultant weapon more efficient with regard to the use of existing weight.
The reconfigured guide rod (42a and 42b) also increases the mass of the recoil mass (22), which can be relocated lower in front of the trigger. This allows for a greater reduction in recoil and/or muzzle rise. The weapon has further reduced recoil over our previous work, and further lowers the firearm's center of reciprocating mass. As such, it is an example of overweighting the reciprocating mass in line with the hand past what is necessary for basic structural integrity. Also, though the axis on which the spring is guided is not further lowered, the overall axis along which recoil forces are transmitted to the user is further lowered with this addition.
The use of the reconfigured rod (42a and 42b) also reduces the total part count by integrating the guide rod with the slide (as opposed to the frame), thus allowing for decreased production cost and increased reliability. The reconfigured guide rod (42a and 42b) still allows for similar disassembly in comparison with current designs, and thus does not require additional training. The reconfigured guide rod (42a and 42b) further reduces recoil, which allows for more rapid follow-up shots and for the use of more powerful ammunition.
Increasing the mass present in the slide internally allows for a weapon with the same exterior slide dimensions to fire more powerful ammunition; alternatively, it allows for a reduction in the exterior slide dimensions of the weapon while still allowing for an identical level of ammunition power.
In the case of an existing pistol using a steel guide rod, this relocation would shift a portion of the total weapon weight from the frame assembly to the slide, essentially allowing for a pistol of equal weight to fire more powerful ammunition in comparison to said existing pistol. This comparison is between a modified and an unmodified pistol both using a half-length guide rod—as such, you could take a pistol with an existing full-length guide rod and modify it by relocating the guide rod (substituting a half-length one) to the slide, thereby creating a pistol both lighter than the unmodified version and yet still able to use more powerful ammunition. Such a substitution is once again assuming all guide rods in both pistols are composed of steel.
The embodiments presented herein may also be improved by overweighting a lower section (48) of the recoil mass (22) or reducing the weight of the upper housing (14). Preferably, the lower section of the recoil mass (22) is the lower half of the recoil mass (22) but may be any amount of the recoil mass (22) that will allow for the center of mass to drop an appreciable amount. Similarly, a reduced weight portion of the upper housing (14) would comprise part of the upper half of same upper housing (14), but may be any amount of the upper housing (14) that will allow for the center of mass to drop an appreciable amount. The upper housing (14), or a portion of such, may be made of a lighter material such as aluminum, titanium, carbon fiber composite, or a similarly durable polymer, whereas the lower section (48) may be made of a heavier material such as tungsten, bismuth, or depleted uranium to further lower the center of mass. The lower section (48) and upper section (50) of the recoil mass (22) may be connected by friction fitting, threads, pinning, dovetailing, adhesive, or any other method for attachment whether known or yet to be discovered. The same methods of attachment apply to the joining of any reduced weight portion of the upper housing (14) with the remainder of the same upper housing (14). Alternatively, the lower section (48) of the recoil mass (22) may be overweighted using the same material as the upper section (50) while remaining the same material as the upper section (50). The result of these modifications is a reduction in the amount of muzzle rise and associated recoil.
The embodiment of
Recoil plate (52) is preferably composed of high-strength material and is inserted into the comparatively lower-strength frame in the area under impact from the slide during recoil. The recoil plate (52) increases the durability of the frame not only through its advantage in material composition but also by further increasing the surface area available to the frame for transmitting the force imparted by the slide (14). This increase in surface area may include the normally wasted space directly behind the guide rod (42), but also by extending the sides and/or top and/or bottom of the recoil plate further into the frame. This may be assisted by an angled component (54) The latter not only helps to seat the recoil plate in the frame but also gives the frame additional surface area to absorb the slide impact beyond merely the surface area of the rear of the slide.
As noted, recoil plate (52) optionally includes an integrated guide rod (42). Integration of the guide rod (42) with the recoil plate (52) (which itself may be permanently attached to the rest of the frame) results in a decreased parts count, lower manufacturing costs, simplified disassembly procedure, and increased weapon reliability.
It is also possible to include an accommodation to reinforce the area of the frame housing a barrel retention device upon the upper surface of angled component (54). Barrel retention devices interact with the bottom of the barrel when the slide and barrel are fully forward under spring pressure to retain both parts on the frame. The area of the frame around and interacting with the barrel retention device is a very high-stress area also, prone to cracking and other wear. By fortifying this area with high-strength material, frame wear is reduced and weapon reliability increased without increasing weapon parts count.
A third embodiment of the firearm (12) is illustrated in
Although this disclosure has been described in terms of certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 15/095,415 filed Apr. 11, 2016, entitled “Firearm Configuration for Reducing Recoil”, which itself is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 14/997,060 filed Jan. 15, 2016, entitled “Firearm Configuration for Reducing Frame Battering,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,546,832, which itself is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 14/948,716 filed Nov. 23, 2015, entitled “Firearm Configuration for Reducing Recoil,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,551,542, which itself is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/313,495 filed Jun. 24, 2014, entitled “Firearm Configuration For Reducing Recoil,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,194,650, issued Nov. 24, 2015, which itself is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 13/617,953 filed Sep. 14, 2012, entitled “Firearm Configuration for Reducing Recoil,” now abandoned. The contents of these applications are fully incorporated herein for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2139203 | Petter | Dec 1938 | A |
| 2522192 | Porter | Sep 1950 | A |
| 2846925 | Norman | Aug 1958 | A |
| 3027673 | Oliver | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3082667 | Ramseyer | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3365829 | Shockey | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3491650 | Rohr | Jan 1970 | A |
| 4031808 | Raville | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4176584 | Thomas, Jr. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4388855 | Sokolovsky | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4522107 | Woodcock | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4563937 | White | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4569270 | Timari | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4579037 | Gillum | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4715140 | Rosenwald | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4955155 | Jones | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5069110 | Menck | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076139 | Hiett | Dec 1991 | A |
| D328632 | Bigwood | Aug 1992 | S |
| 5675106 | Leiter | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5734120 | Besselink | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5815972 | Anderson | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5818972 | Girod | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6129000 | Schmid | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6212991 | Frazier, III | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6530306 | LaFleur | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6742297 | Lakatos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 8037805 | Neroni | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8132352 | Lippard | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8156677 | Glock | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8539706 | Vieweg | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 9897403 | Kedairy | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 20060266209 | Grabowski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20090126559 | Mantas | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100031812 | Kerbrat et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077643 | Kerbrat et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20140075799 | Hangen | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20160047613 | Hudson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20180164058 | Hudson et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19951536 | Jul 2001 | DE |
| 19951536 | Jul 2001 | DE |
| 2009024309 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009024309 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Definition of “Alignment”. American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170276444 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14313495 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 14948716 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15095415 | Apr 2016 | US |
| Child | 15485626 | US | |
| Parent | 14997060 | Jan 2016 | US |
| Child | 15095415 | US | |
| Parent | 14948716 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Child | 14997060 | US | |
| Parent | 13617953 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Child | 14313495 | US |
