This invention relates to electronic circuits, and more particularly to a fixed-frequency LLC resonant power regulator.
There is an increasing demand for power conversion and regulation circuitry to operate with increased efficiency and reduced power dissipation to accommodate the continuous reduction in size of electronic devices. Switching regulators have been implemented as an efficient mechanism for providing a regulated output in power supplies. One such type of regulator is known as a switching regulator or switching power supply, which controls the flow of power to a load by controlling the on and off duty-cycle of one or more switches coupled to the load. Many different classes of switching regulators exist today.
One such type of switching regulator is a resonant power regulator. A resonant power regulator can be configured with a resonant tank that conducts an oscillating resonant current based on a power storage interaction between a capacitor and an inductor, such as in a primary inductor of a transformer. The oscillating resonant current can be generated based on the operation of the switches, and can thus induce a current in a secondary inductor of the transformer. Therefore, an output voltage can be generated based on the output current. Resonant power regulators can be implemented to achieve very low switching loss, and can thus be operated at substantially high switching frequencies.
One embodiment of the invention includes an LLC resonant AC/DC power regulator system. The system includes a transformer comprising a primary inductor and a secondary inductor. An LLC resonant tank is configured to have a first second resonant frequencies. A full-bridge is coupled between first and second voltages and includes a first pair of switches coupled between the first and second voltages and a second pair of switches coupled between the first and second voltages. The LLC resonant tank is coupled between a first node that interconnects the first pair of switches and a second node that interconnects the second pair of switches. The switches are activated and deactivated to generate a resonant current through the LLC resonant tank in response respective switching control signals. The respective switching control signals have fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle to activate the plurality of switches in a zero voltage switching (ZVS) manner. An output stage is coupled to the secondary inductor and comprising at least one output rectifier that is configured to conduct an output current that is generated in the secondary inductor in response to the resonant current. The output stage generates a rectified output voltage at an output based on the output current.
Another embodiment of the invention includes a method for generating an output voltage via an LLC resonant power regulator. The method includes generating a plurality of switching control signals having a fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle and activating a plurality of switches configured as a full-bridge arrangement in a predetermined sequence in an input stage of the LLC resonant power regulator in response to the plurality of switching signals. The method also includes generating a resonant current through an LLC resonant tank comprising a series connection of a primary inductor of a transformer, a leakage inductor, and a resonant capacitor in response to the activation of the plurality of switches. The method also includes discharging parasitic capacitances associated with the plurality of switches in the predetermined sequence in response to the resonant current to activate the plurality of switches in a ZVS manner. The method also includes generating an output current at a secondary inductor of the transformer, conducting the output current through at least one rectifier in a ZCS manner, and generating an output voltage at an output of the LLC resonant power converter in response to the output current.
Another embodiment of the invention includes an LLC resonant power regulator system. The system includes a switching control stage configured to generate a plurality of switching control signals having a fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle and an LLC resonant tank comprising a primary inductor of a transformer, a leakage inductor, and a resonant capacitor arranged in series. The system also includes an input stage comprising a plurality of switches arranged as a full-bridge and being controlled by the respective plurality of switching control signals to activate and deactivate in a predetermined sequence to alternately couple and decouple the LLC resonant tank to a high voltage rail and a low voltage rail to generate a resonant current through the LLC resonant tank. The system further includes an output stage comprising a pair of output rectifiers configured to alternately conduct an output current that is generated by a secondary inductor of the transformer in response to the resonant current to generate an output voltage at an output.
The invention relates to electronic circuits, and more particularly to a fixed-frequency LLC resonant power regulator. The LLC resonant power regulator can include a transformer having a primary inductor and a secondary inductor. The primary inductor of the transformer, a leakage inductor, and a resonant capacitor collectively form an LLC resonant tank having a first resonant frequency based on the leakage inductor and the resonant capacitor and a second resonant frequency based on the primary inductor, the leakage inductor, and the resonant capacitor. Therefore, a resonant current is generated in the LLC resonant tank, which thus induces an output current in the secondary inductor to an output stage. The output stage includes a set of output rectifiers, such as diodes, and an output capacitor. The output rectifiers thus alternately conduct the output current to generate an output voltage across the output capacitor and an associated load.
The LLC resonant power regulator can also include an input stage having a full-bridge (i.e., an H-bridge) arrangement of transistors, such as metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). The full-bridge arrangement can include two interconnecting nodes that are coupled via the LLC resonant tank. The MOSFETs can be driven by a plurality of switching control signals, such as provided from a switching control stage, that have a fixed frequency and a regulated duty-cycle. Therefore, the MOSFETs can be activated and deactivated in a predetermined sequence to generate the LLC resonant current based on alternately coupling each end of the LLC resonant tank to a high voltage rail and a low voltage rail.
The fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle of the switching control signals, and thus the predetermined sequence of activation of the full-bridge arrangement of the MOSFETs, can be selected such that the MOSFETs are deactivated in a zero voltage switching (ZVS) manner and the output rectifiers are deactivated in a zero current switching (ZCS) manner. Specifically, the MOSFETs can each include a parasitic capacitance and a body-diode. The parasitic capacitance can be alternately charged and discharged by the resonant current through the LLC resonant tank. Upon discharge of the parasitic capacitance by the resonant current, the body-diode can begin to conduct the resonant current. Therefore, the respective MOSFET can be activated subsequent to the conduction of the resonant current in the ZVS manner. In addition, based on changes in current flux through the transistor current in response to oscillation of the resonant current through the LLC resonant tank, the output current can change direction in the output stage. Therefore, the output current can decrease to a magnitude of approximately zero through one of the output rectifiers before being conducted through the other output rectifier, and thus the output rectifiers can be deactivated in the ZCS manner. Accordingly, the fixed-frequency LLC power regulator can be operated with improved input and loading regulation to result in substantially improved efficiency with substantially less electromagnetic interference (EMI) than typical LLC power regulators.
The LLC resonant power regulator system 10 includes a switching control stage 12 configured to generate a plurality of switching control signals. In the example of
The LLC resonant tank 18 is configured to conduct a resonant current IRES in response to the operation of the switches 16. In the example of
As an example, the LLC resonant tank 18 can be interconnected between the first and second interconnecting control nodes in the input stage 14. The switching control signals SW1 through SW4 can have a fixed frequency and a regulated duty-cycle, and can be asserted (i.e., logic-high) and de-asserted (i.e., logic-low) in a predetermined sequence. Therefore, the switches 16 can be operated by the switching control signals SW1 through SW4 in the predetermined sequence to alternately couple each end of the LLC resonant tank 18 to the input voltage VIN and to ground. Accordingly, the resonant current IRES can resonate through the LLC resonant tank 18 at the first resonant frequency and the second resonant frequency based on the predetermined activation/deactivation sequence of the switches 16. The predetermined activation/deactivation sequence of the switches 16 can thus define phases of operation of the switches 16 based on the magnitude of the resonant current IRES, as described herein. By controlling the switches as described herein, the voltage across the output nodes of the input stage can be provided as an alternating voltage, such as alternating between VIN, 0 V, and VIN, according to the phase of operation (see, e.g.,
In response to the oscillation of the resonant current IRES through the primary inductor of the transformer 20, a secondary inductor of the transformer 20 generates an output current IOUT. Specifically, the output current IOUT is induced by the resonant current IRES based on a magnetic flux through the core of the transformer 20. The output current IOUT can thus have a flow direction based on the direction of the magnetic flux through the core of the transformer 20 in response to the direction of flow of the resonant current IRES. The output current IOUT is provided to an output stage 22. The output stage 22 includes at least one output rectifier 24 that is configured to rectify the output current IOUT to thus generate the output voltage VOUT across the load RL. As an example, the output rectifier(s) 24 can include a pair of DC rectifiers that are configured to alternately conduct the output current IOUT based on the direction of flow of the output current IOUT.
Based on the fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle of the switching control signals SW1 through SW4, the LLC resonant power regulator system 10 can operate with improved input and loading regulation to result in substantially improved efficiency with substantially less electromagnetic interference (EMI) than typical LLC power regulators. Specifically, the switches 16 and the output rectifier(s) 24 can be soft-switched, such that they are operated in a zero voltage switching (ZVS) and a zero current switching (ZCS) manner, respectively, in response to the predetermined switching sequence of the switches 16 defined by the fixed frequency and regulated duty-cycle of the switching control signals SW1 through SW4. For example, the switching control signals SW1 through SW4 can have a frequency that is selected to be greater than one or both of the first and second resonant frequencies of the LLC resonant tank 18. Therefore, the switches 16 can operate in the ZVS manner to operate the LLC resonant power regulator system 10 more efficiently and the output rectifier(s) 24 can operate in the ZCS manner to substantially mitigate reverse recovery oscillation via the transformer 20.
The LLC resonant power regulator system 50 includes an input stage 52 that is interconnected between a high voltage rail, demonstrated as the input voltage VIN, and a low voltage rail, demonstrated as ground. The input stage 52 includes a plurality of switches, demonstrated in the example of
Referring back to the example of
As described above, the resonant current IRES is generated based on the switching of the MOSFETs Q1 through Q4. The switching control signals SW1 through SW4 can have a fixed frequency and a regulated duty-cycle, and can be asserted and de-asserted in a predetermined sequence. Therefore, the MOSFETs Q1 through Q4 can be operated by the switching control signals SW1 through SW4 in the predetermined sequence to alternately couple each end of the LLC resonant tank 58 to the input voltage VIN and to ground, such that the difference between the voltage VA and the voltage VB can be periodically switched between zero, a positive magnitude of the input voltage VIN and a negative magnitude of the input voltage VIN. Accordingly, the resonant current IRES can alternate at resonating through the LLC resonant tank 58 at each of the first resonant frequency fr1 and the second resonant frequency fr2 based on the predetermined activation/deactivation sequence of the MOSFETs Q1 through Q4.
In the example of
In response to the oscillation of the resonant current IRES through the primary inductor LM of the transformer 60, a secondary inductor LO of the transformer 60 generates an output current IOUT that is induced in the secondary inductor LO based on a magnetic flux through the core of the transformer 60. The output current LOUT has a direction of current flow that is based on the direction of the magnetic flux through the core of the transformer 60 in response to the direction of flow of the resonant current IRES. In the example of
Similar to as described above in the example of
It is to be understood that the LLC resonant power regulator system 50 is not intended to be limited to the example of
The timing diagram 100 demonstrates an example of the predetermined sequence of the switching control signals SW1 through SW4 over time. Specifically, the predetermined sequence is demonstrated as a sequence of eight phases, demonstrated in the example of
In PHASE 1, the switching control signals SW1 and SW4 are demonstrated as asserted and the switching control signals SW2 and SW3 are demonstrated as de-asserted. Therefore, the MOSFETs Q1 and Q4 are activated and the MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 are deactivated in PHASE 1. Thus, a voltage VAB (i.e., the difference between the voltage VA and the voltage VB at the respective control nodes 54 and 56) is positive in PHASE 1. The current ILK through the leakage inductor LK increases substantially sinusoidally from a negative magnitude (i.e., relative to as demonstrated in the example of
At the time T1, at the beginning of PHASE 2, the switching control signal SW1 is de-asserted to deactivate the MOSFET Q1. However, the currents LK and LM continue to flow. In response, the parasitic capacitance CP1 of the MOSFET Q1 is charged and a parasitic capacitance CP2 of the MOSFET Q2 is discharged, demonstrated in the example of
In PHASE 3, upon activation of the MOSFET Q2, the voltage VAB becomes approximately equal to zero. The current ILK through the leakage inductor LK thus begins to decrease. In response, the output current IOUT
At the time T3, at the beginning of PHASE 4, the switching control signal SW4 is de-asserted to deactivate the MOSFET Q4. However, the resonant current IRES continues to flow. In response, a parasitic capacitance CP4 of the MOSFET Q4 is charged and a parasitic capacitance CP3 of the MOSFET Q3 is discharged, demonstrated in the example of
In PHASE 5, upon activation of the MOSFET Q3, the voltage VAB becomes negative. Thus, the resonant current IRES begins to resonate at the first resonant frequency fr1 again. Specifically, the current ILK through the leakage inductor LK begins to decrease substantially sinusoidally from the positive magnitude while the current ILM through the primary inductor LM begins to decrease substantially linearly from approximately the same magnitude at the time T4, such as based on a constant voltage across the primary inductor LM. During PHASE 5 each of the currents ILK and ILM reverse direction, and thus become positive. In addition, based on the reversed direction of the magnetic flux through the transformer 60, the output current IOUT
At the time T5, at the beginning of PHASE 6, the switching control signal SW2 is de-asserted to deactivate the MOSFET Q2. However, the currents LK and LM continue to flow. In response, a parasitic capacitance CP2 of the MOSFET Q2 is charged and a parasitic capacitance CP1 of the MOSFET Q is discharged, demonstrated in the example of
In PHASE 7, upon activation of the MOSFET Q1, the voltage VAB becomes approximately equal to zero. The current ILK through the leakage inductor LK thus begins to increase. In response, the output current IOUT
At the time T7, at the beginning of PHASE 8, the switching control signal SW3 is de-asserted to deactivate the MOSFET Q3. However, the resonant current IRES continues to flow. In response, a parasitic capacitance CP3 of the MOSFET Q3 is charged and a parasitic capacitance CP4 of the MOSFET Q4 is discharged, demonstrated in the example of
In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, certain methods will be better appreciated with reference to
At 156, a resonant current is generated through an LLC resonant tank in response to the activation of the plurality of switches. The LLC resonant tank can include a series connection of a primary inductor of a transformer, a leakage inductor, and a resonant capacitor. The resonant current can include a leakage current through the leakage inductor and a magnetizing current that is associated with the reactance of the primary inductor. At 158, parasitic capacitances associated with the plurality of switches are discharged in the predetermined sequence in response to the resonant current to activate the plurality of switches in a ZVS manner. Each of the switches can also include a body-diode that conducts the resonant current just prior to the activation of the switch. At 160, an output current is generated at a secondary inductor of the transformer. The output current can be induced by the magnetic flux that results from the resonant current flow through the primary inductor.
At 162, the output current is conducted through at least one rectifier in a ZCS manner. The at least one rectifier can include a pair of output diodes that alternately conduct the output current. The direction of the current flow of the output current can change in the secondary inductor based on changes in the magnetic flux through the core. Thus, the current through one of the diodes can decrease to a magnitude of zero before beginning to conduct through the other diode. At 164, an output voltage is generated at an output of the LLC resonant power converter in response to the output current. The output voltage can be maintained by an output capacitor when the magnitude of the output current is approximately zero.
What have been described above are examples of the invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the invention are possible. Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of this application, including the appended claims.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN08/02031 | 12/19/2008 | WO | 00 | 8/23/2011 |