The present invention relates to warning signs and in particular to flag indicators used with such signs.
Warning signs are employed in a wide variety of different applications. One important application concerns the safety of highway motorists and pedestrians. It is important to alert both motorists and pedestrians that extra care should be exercised at a particular location. Such warnings may arise from conditions which are either temporary or long term. Long term operations are typically accommodated by vehicular barriers, fencing and similar provisions, while temporary situations require special consideration. A temporary situation may arise, for example, when a work crew is dispatched to a location at or immediately adjacent to a roadway. For example, motorists and pedestrians both are accustomed to seeing utility work crews at roadside locations, from time to time. It would not be appropriate, in these instances, to require fencing or other barriers to be erected to provide a warning that extra care should be taken at the immediate location. Rather, lightweight warning systems are employed that are quickly and easily erected and stored from day to day or even within a portion of a workday. Temporary warning signs have been developed for this purpose. For example, a warning legend may be imprinted on a flexible panel having a cloth or other flexible substraight. Such panels may be coated with a reflective material to further improve their ability to warn nearby motorists and pedestrians that they are entering a location requiring that extra care be taken.
Sign stand systems for use with flexible sign panels have been developed. Typically, the flexible sign panel is folded into a roll when its use is temporary suspended. Upon arrival at a worksite, the flexible message panel is unrolled and flattened into a generally planar or sheet-like configuration. A sign stand system is then erected to support the panel in a generally flat or taut condition that is conducive to enhance legibility. While virtually any type of backing support may be provided, it is generally preferred that the sign stand system also be capable of breakdown for storage into a relatively small sized package. It has been found popular in this regard, to provide braces for sign panels that are made of strong, but lightweight materials such as fiberglass ribs. A ground-engaging stand is provided, usually in the form of a ground post or a multi-legged support system that can be folded when not in use. Typically, one of the ribs is arranged in a vertical position and the bottom end of the rib is engaged with the base of the sign stand. In use, the ribs are expanded and engaged with the sign stand base. After unrolling, the sign panel is attached to the ribs preferably in a stretched or taut condition.
As mentioned, warning systems are often times employed adjacent to a roadway, and thus are subjected to buffeting forces arising from motor vehicles passing nearby. Of course, the sign panel also absorbs energy from applied wind loadings. The sign stand base is often times spring loaded to absorb these forces so as to maintain the sign panel relatively immobile.
It has been found important, that despite the proven performance and wide-spread acceptance of light-weight message systems, that additional warning indication be provided. Typically, sign stand systems are designed to maximize the sign panel area that can be reliably supported, despite buffeting from traffic and applied wind loads. Accordingly, it would not be appropriate to enlarge the “sail area” of the message panel with additional devices visible to nearby motorists and pedestrians. One expedient that has been preferred over the years is to affix one or more warning flags to the sign panel system. Flags have the advantage of utilizing applied wind loads and roadside buffeting converting the applied loadings to movement of the supported flags, a strategy that can not be used with the message panel which must be maintained relatively immobile so as to guarantee proper orientation to oncoming motorists and pedestrians.
While flags may be added to the sides of message panels, it is generally preferred that the flags be mounted at the top of the sign stand system so as to extend above the message panel. A variety of flag mounting arrangements have been provided over the years. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,024 assigned to the assignee of the present invention, a bracket is provided at the top of a sign panel to support one or more warning flags that extend above the sign panel. When three flags are provided, the central flag is removable from the bracket of the sign panel system, with the remaining flags permanently connected to the bracket for pivoting between display and storage positions. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,725,186 and 6,381,889 provide brackets with individual positions for multiple flags.
Several patents provide arrangements in which one or more flag staffs are permanently secured to a sign panel system. The following patents provide permanent pivotal attachments for flags selectably movable from an upright display position to a storage position, where the flag staffs are aligned with a vertical sign panel rib, in preparation for rollup and storage. Included are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,980,984; 6,045,110; 6,047,941; 5,829,178; 5,832,866; and 5,829,178. U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,091 provides a bracket at the top of a sign stand assembly to which flag staffs are permanently pivotally mounted for rotation parallel to the message panel. Arms project outwardly from the bracket in a direction generally perpendicular to the plane of the message panel to provide stops for the flag staffs, preventing their unintentional collapse, once erected in an upright position at acute angles to the vertical. Problems have been observed with this latter type of arrangement. As mentioned, the sign panel system and any warning flags attached thereto are subjected to buffeting from nearby traffic as well as wind loading. These forces are also applied to the warning flags and these forces can be considerable, especially when energetic wind gusts repeatedly pound against the warning flags and their flag staffs. With repeated loading and vibration due to wind forces, the arms, which normally provide position stops for the flag staffs, have been observed to wear away at the flag staff edges, causing premature deterioration of the flag staffs, and hence requiring accelerated maintenance.
Despite the advances made in the field of flag displays and other types of warning devices associated with highway warning systems, further advantages in cost and manufacture are still being sought.
A sign stand system embodying the present invention includes a sign stand base having ground engaging legs supporting an upright mast which in turn supports a flexible sign panel. A cross brace is attached to the mast and extends in a generally horizontal direction so as to support opposed horizontal corners of the sign panel. If desired, the a vertical brace can be provided to directly support top and bottom corners of the sign panel with a mast in turn supporting the vertical brace. A clamp is secured at the top of the sign stand system, and is secured either to the vertical brace or the upright mast. Preferably, the bracket is located adjacent the upper portion of the sign panel and if desired, could be mounted above the sign panel. The bracket includes four spaced-apart body portions disposed in pairs, one pair above the other. The body portions are spaced apart so as to define at least two channels for receiving a flag-supporting staff. Preferably, the flag-supporting staff is pivotally attached to a portion of the bracket centrally located with respect to the body portions. When the flags are deployed, the flag staffs are rotated for alignment with a respective channel, with two of the body portions being longitudinally spaced apart with respect to the longitudinal axis of the staff, and simultaneously engaging opposed sides of the staff. The body portions cooperate with the pivotal connection to support and lock the flag staffs in predetermined positions.
These and other advantages and features of the present invention which will become apparent from setting the appended description drawings and claims are attained in a display system provided for use with a sign panel, for mounting at least two flags that are supported by respective flag staffs. Included is a bracket which preferably has a monolithic construction, provided with a securement such as a passageway for a bolt to attach the bracket to a structure associated with the sign panel. In one example, the structure is a vertical support member preferably in the form of a vertical rib. The bracket includes four spaced-apart body portions arranged in pairs, the body portions of each pair preferably being diagonally spaced apart one from the other. Preferably, the four body portions comprise surfaces of raised body parts preferably having a triangular shape and arranged so as to form two diagonal channels.
A pivot connection is provided for attaching the flag staffs to a portion of the bracket, preferably a portion located between the body parts, so that the flag staffs may be rotated into and out of alignment with the channels. When rotated into alignment with the respective channels, the flag staffs are fixed in a preselected rotational position, with the pairs of body portions supporting respective flag staffs. The support points for each flag staff are longitudinally spaced apart from one another along the longitudinal axis of the flag staff and positioned so as to simultaneously engage oppose the sides of the flag staff. In one arrangement, the pivot connection comprises a bolt or the like fastener extending through the flag staffs and the bracket for attachment to a supporting member such as a vertical rib support of a sign panel. On the side of the bracket facing away from the body portions, a raised mounting pad is provided for clearance from the vertical rib.
In one arrangement, the body parts, comprising three-sided generally triangular-shaped components have corners laterally opposed to one another with the pivot connection disposed between the opposed corners. If desired, a vertical recess may be formed in the bracket, extending through the pivot connection so as to receive a flag staff of a third flag member. The body parts are spaced apart one from the other so as to form a vertical channel and the flag staffs are pivotable to an inverted vertical storage position, with the flags located below the pivot connection.
In another example a warning sign system is provided for displaying information. A warning sign system includes, in addition to the display system described above, a sign panel and a vertical support member, such as a rib, for supporting the sign panel and the bracket. Preferably, the bracket is located adjacent an upper portion of the vertical rib so that the flags, when rotated to a display position, extend above the sign panel.
In the drawings:
The invention disclosed herein is, of course, susceptible of embodiment in many different forms. Shown in the drawings and described herein below in detail is a preferred embodiment of the warning sign system of the invention. It is to be understood, however, that the present disclosure is an exemplification of the principles of the invention and does not limit the invention to the illustrated embodiment.
For ease of description, warning sign systems utilizing a bracket embodying the present invention is described herein below in its usual assembled position as shown in the accompanying drawings, and terms such as upper, lower, horizontal, longitudinal, etc., may be used herein with reference to this usual position. However, the warning sign systems may be manufactured, transported, sold, or used in orientations other than and described and shown herein.
Referring now to the drawings, and initially to FIGS. 1 and 7-9, a warning sign system generally indicated at 10 includes a sign panel 12, preferably made of flexible material, supported at its corners by a vertical support member or rib 12 pivotally connected at 16 to a horizontal support member or rib 14. Sign panel 12 has a front face 20 visible in
Referring again to
Turning now to
As can be seen in
As can be seen for example in
Several variations are possible, without requiring substantial increase in manufacturing or assembly cost. For example, a greatly enlarged contact surfaces 62a, 62b, 64a and 64b have been found sufficient to prevent damage to the flag staffs, even when the bracket is made of relatively hard plastic, aluminum or the like material. It is also possible to form bracket 50 from elastomeric or other resilient materials such as rubber. Alternatively, a rubber face can be conveniently applied to the contact surfaces by use of adhesive, by insets or inserts of elastomeric material into the contact surfaces or by forming elastomeric inserts which are slotted, keyed, or otherwise configured for sliding engagement with the side portions 62, 64. Alternatively, the entire side portions 62, 64 could be formed of elastomeric material which is applied to the major face of bracket 50. As a further alternative, side portions 62, 64 could be replaced by pairs of pins, posts or other conveniently shaped stop members formed of elastomeric material or a rigid base having an outer elastomeric covering. The stop members, having at least an outer surface of elastomeric material, could have a contact area considerably smaller than the area of contact surfaces 62a, 62b, 64a and 64b.
The foregoing descriptions and the accompanying drawings are illustrative of the present invention. Still other variations and arrangements of parts are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1404777 | Leutner | Jan 1922 | A |
1575614 | Blaw | Mar 1926 | A |
3357662 | Peterson | Dec 1967 | A |
4619220 | Seely et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4980984 | Kulp et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5094023 | McVey | Mar 1992 | A |
5152091 | Leach | Oct 1992 | A |
5197408 | Stoudt | Mar 1993 | A |
5231778 | Belobraydich et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5309862 | Lang | May 1994 | A |
5438782 | Belobraydich et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5540007 | Kulp et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5725186 | Hillstrom et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5829178 | Hillstrom | Nov 1998 | A |
5832866 | Stoudt | Nov 1998 | A |
5895024 | Williams et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6045110 | Kulp et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047941 | Kulp et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6195925 | Werner | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6381889 | Knapp | May 2002 | B1 |
6427964 | Hillstrom et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090013920 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |