Patent Application
20070281260
The description of the embodiment that follows illustrates a possible application of the present invention in a boiler furnace, whereby:
a is a block diagram illustrating components of a second example of a flame detection device according to the present invention;
As illustrated in
An exemplary embodiment of the flame detection device 1 according to the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to
Although the flame detection device described herein employs viewing optics and a CCD imager within near IR wavelengths, other arrangements operating with wavelengths in ultraviolet, visible and combinations of ultraviolet, visible, and infrared may be used. Other suitable imaging devices such as CMOS devices may also be employed. The principle of detection and processing remain the same, only functioning at a different wavelength of light determined by the appropriate optics, filter and imager.
The presence of flame in the context of the entire specification refers to the existence of flame along with determination that the flame viewed by the sensor belongs to the local target burner and is not background radiation from adjacent burners in the furnace, unless otherwise stated.
The flame position may, on occasion, flicker and move out of the field of view of the lens 101 which may be limited by the sighting arrangement. In order to overcome the problems associated with line of sight, an alternate means to transmit radiation incident on the lens 101 onto the CCD imager 103 may be provided. For example, coherent light fiber optics can be used to position the viewing optics at the front of the sighting tube 2, allowing light to be collected over wider angles. In this case, a fiber optics bundle 110 is positioned between the lens 101 and the IR filter 102. When using fiber optics, the sighting tube 2 is extended, and the lens 101 is moved to the distal end thereof (see
The Frame Capture Section 104 provides the necessary control signals for acquiring and digitizing the image output from the CCD imager 103, and also for storing the images in memory 106 local to the flame detection device 1. The control signals may also include signals for synchronizing the acquisition of the image to be in tune with the frame rate requirements of Processing Section 105. Flame images are obtained at such a rate that flame conditions, particularly loss of flame, can be determined within a safe margin of time. In boiler systems, the flame detection device 1 will capture and process the images at a rate to satisfy the safety requirements of the boiler control system. For example, the frame capture rate may be 40 frames per second.
The Processing Section 105 comprises a DSP Microcontroller, a hybrid processor designed to handle both control and signal processing applications, and supporting logic. Several types of digital processors that can implement the functions of the flame detection device 1 are commercially available and may suitably be employed. For example, Freescale 56800/E family and Texas Instruments C2000 family of DSP microcontrollers may be employed as the DSP microcontroller. The DSP Microcontroller performs data processing for the entire flame detection device 1, which includes Frame Capture Section 104, memory 106, image processing, image evaluation operations, confidence level thresholding, and determination of presence or absence of flame. The DSP microcontroller may also communicate with external devices such as a computer 120 and/or an I/O device 107, shown in
As illustrated in
The I/O device 107 supports the operation of a separate burner control system (not shown) by providing the required flame status relay output contacts 108. The I/O device 107 receives flame presence or absence status from the flame detection device 1 at regular intervals, and activates or deactivates the flame contact relay 108 (normally open (NO) and normally closed (NC) as shown in
The I/O device 107 also receives the flame confidence level from the flame detection device 1 and outputs this as an analog signal 109 representative of the 0 to 100% range of the flame confidence result. The analog output may be a current loop, 4-mA, or a voltage, 1-5VDC. The I/O device 107 may also include a display panel 115, such as a LCD unit, to display the flame confidence level. The flame confidence level may be displayed as a bar graph.
Each of the individual I/O devices 107 of a multi-burner system are typically coupled via a communication link 111 to a computer 120. This link is independent of the individual dedicated communication links 122 between I/O devices 107 and flame detection devices 1, but may be shared by all I/O devices 107 and the computer 120.
The I/O device 107 activates its I/O controls based on the commands from the flame detection device 1 and passes through communication messages to and from the flame detection device 1 and the computer 120.
The computer 120 may be housed in a remote location and used as a monitoring station executing a software tool 112 developed in accordance with the present invention. The computer 120 is capable of executing the software tool 112 and communicating to the I/O device 107. The software tool 112 is used to monitor real-time flame images and the results of the image processing calculations sent from the flame detection device 1. The software tool 112 will also be used in the initial learn mode of the flame detection device 1 to select appropriate criteria to be used in the analysis based on viewing of the flame images obtained under known good burner flame conditions.
Under certain circumstances, the computer 120 may be in direct communication via the communication link 111 with the flame detection device 1 without employing the I/O device 107, as shown in
Additionally, the software tool 112 may be used for remote tuning, control and monitoring of one or more flame detection devices 1. The software tool 112 may be configured for displaying a pictorial overview of all burner flame intensities, confidence levels and evaluation results displayed in the same matrix as the burner configuration of the boiler system. Furthermore, qualitative burner flame analysis along with logging and trending of burner flame conditions may be performed by the software tool 112.
In general, a flame detection system will distinguish between the following flame conditions: main fuel flame from the burner being monitored, flame out condition on the burner being monitored, and background flame from other burners in the furnace. An approach is provided herein for distinguishing these conditions by using a technique of frame differencing, patterning current image frame characteristics from a reference set of image characteristics, and thresholding the result.
The reference set of image characteristics is obtained by operating the flame detection device 1 in a learn mode. As illustrated in the flow chart in
No single spatial, temporal or energy resolution is universally suitable for flame detection. Therefore, an approach is undertaken that allows for selection of criteria appropriate for a particular situation. With the flame detection device 1 in learn mode, graphic investigative aids provided on the software tool 112 can be adapted to identify the features best suited for distinguishing target flame dynamics from the background by highlighting regions of interest in the flame image and excluding or attenuating regions of lesser importance.
The flame detection device may also be adapted to learn characteristics of background flame. The background flame is often undesirable for proper flame detection and may impede the correct determination of flame status of a burner. The characteristics of the background flame may then be added to the pattern recognition criteria.
The results from the criteria selection developed in the learn mode is saved in the flame detection device 1 and used during the evaluation operations when the flame detection device 1 is placed in run mode. The computer 120 and software tool 112 are not required when the flame detection device 1 is in run mode and hence can be disconnected. However, the software tool 112, when in communication with the flame detection device 1, may be adapted for monitoring the actions and results of the flame detection device 1.
A command may be executed from the software tool 112 to place the flame detection device in the run mode. This is commonly the standard mode of operation. In run mode, the flame detector performs an evaluation operation which compares, through pattern recognition techniques, the latest flame images and their derived characteristics against the pre-stored learned characteristics.
The evaluation operation will include, but is not limited to, extracting spatial, temporal and energy features from the flame image stream. The criteria used draws from statistical and probabilistic inference. Spatial factors include mapping of flame area features. By detecting boundaries between key aspects of target flame front, edges may be used to increase weighting on prominent regions of flame. From the energy value of each flame image pixel a threshold can be set to filter out background flame components, as well as to determine pixel intensity distribution, mean, standard deviation and other statistical measures of pixel activity.
Since the flame detection device 1 is fully self-sufficient in the run mode, the actions preformed remotely on the computer 120 do not affect integrity or the decision making process thereof.
The calculated confidence level, or likelihood of flame presence, is a result of the sampling and analysis of several flame images as illustrated in the flowchart in
Images of the burner flame are then captured at predetermined intervals. Intervals may be as small as one second, to effectively enable real time monitoring. Each subsequent image undergoes the same evaluation and pattern recognition operations as the first, resulting in a confidence calculation at each interval of time.
The current image confidence calculation along with several of the immediate past image confidence calculations are used to determine an overall computed confidence level. This smoothing of data results overcomes brief transitory movements of the target burner flame that do not actually indicate loss of flame. It also results in a moving analysis being performed, continuously updating the confidence level over a fixed window time.
The confidence level may be calculated from an aggregate of different flame feature measurements, with the calculated result then compared to a predetermined threshold to establish presence or absence of flame in the monitored burner.
The method of flame detection depends on characterizing the different flame conditions based on digitized images of the emitted radiation, and on calculating a confidence level, or likelihood of flame presence determined by evaluating a measure of fit between the latest images and previously stored characterizations.
The typical procedure followed to detect flame presence is as follows:
1. Select the burner operating range and conditions to be monitored.
2. Obtain characterizations of the flame conditions to be monitored.
3. Select the criteria to be used in the evaluation operation.
4. Capture a flame image, and obtain the frame characterization outputs by running the evaluation criteria against the current sample.
5. Compare the latest frame characterization outputs with the previously stored characterizations and obtain a confidence level, indicating a likelihood of flame presence.
6. Output flame condition to the I/O device.
7. Repeat steps (4) through (6).
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the spirit of the essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore illustrative and not restrictive.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60799666 | May 2006 | US |
