Patent Grant
9259599
This invention relates to a flame resistant fabric, and more specifically to a flame resistant fabric having different properties on each side of the fabric.
Flame resistant fabrics, and in particular garments, are desirable in many military and industrial applications. Military personnel in the field, for example, can be exposed to flash fire or electrical arc situations and it is therefore desirable that their combat uniforms provide protection from such conditions. While many fabrics provide suitable flame resistance properties and can be incorporated into combat uniforms and other industrial protective gear, flame resistance is not the only requirement for such fabrics. Other factors, such as comfort, durability, thermal performance, printability, dyeability and cost are also considered when evaluating the suitability of a fabric for military or industrial applications.
Not all protective fabrics are the same. Fabrics made entirely from inherently flame resistant fibers such as para-aramids and meta-aramids, for example, provide excellent flame resistance but garments made therefrom do not naturally absorb water and thus have poor moisture management properties. These garments can thus be uncomfortable on the skin of the wearer. This drawback can be tempered by the inclusion of softer and more absorbent fiber, such as cellulosic fibers. Such fibers, however, are less durable than inherently flame resistant fibers.
Fabrics made from blends of different fibers can have some of the beneficial properties of the individual fibers, but with those benefits come the drawbacks of each fiber. Thus, it has traditionally been necessary to select fiber blends for a fabric to maximize the desirable properties in the fabric while minimizing the undesirable effects of these fibers. This balancing act has not always been successfully performed.
Thus, a need exists for a fabric in which desirable properties can more easily be imparted to the fabric and in which negative effects due to use of particular fibers can be minimized.
The terms “invention,” “the invention,” “this invention” and “the present invention” used in this patent are intended to refer broadly to all of the subject matter of this patent and the patent claims below. Statements containing these terms should be understood not to limit the subject matter described herein or to limit the meaning or scope of the patent claims below. Embodiments of the invention covered by this patent are defined by the claims below, not this summary. This summary is a high-level overview of various aspects of the invention and introduces some of the concepts that are further described in the Detailed Description section below. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used in isolation to determine the scope of the claimed subject matter. The subject matter should be understood by reference to appropriate portions of the entire specification of this patent, any or all drawings and each claim.
The present invention is directed to flame resistant fabrics formed by warp and fill yarns having different fiber contents. The fabrics are constructed such that the body side of the fabric (the side of the fabric on the side of the body of the wearer (assuming the fabric will be incorporated into a garment)) and the face side of the fabric (the side of the fabric facing away from the body of the wearer) have different properties. For example, it may be desirable for the body side of the fabric to be relatively softer and more absorbent, and thus more comfortable, for contact with the skin of the wearer, and for the face side of the fabric to have improved durability at the expense of comfort (since comfort is not as much of a consideration on the face side of the fabric).
In one embodiment, a flame resistant fabric includes warp yarns and fill yarns and has a body side and a face side. Either of the warp yarns or the fill yarns comprises a first fiber content and the other of the warp yarns or the fill yarns comprises a second fiber content different from the first fiber content. Fibers of the first fiber content are predominantly exposed on the body side of the fabric; and fibers of the second fiber content are predominantly exposed on the face side of the fabric.
In some embodiments, the warp yarns and fill yarns can have different amounts of the same fibers or, in yet other embodiments, can have different fibers or different blends of fibers.
In still another embodiment, the body fibers and the face fibers are woven in the fabric. The weave can be one or more of a twill, satin or sateen weave.
In other embodiments, garments formed from the flame resistant fabric described above are provided. The garments are suitable for use in military and industrial applications, and are particularly suitable for use in a military battle dress uniform.
In yet other embodiments, methods of making the flame resistant fabric and methods of making garments from the flame resistant fabric are provided.
The subject matter of embodiments of the present invention is described here with specificity to meet statutory requirements, but this description is not necessarily intended to limit the scope of the claims. The claimed subject matter may be embodied in other ways, may include different elements or steps, and may be used in conjunction with other existing or future technologies. This description should not be interpreted as implying any particular order or arrangement among or between various steps or elements except when the order of individual steps or arrangement of elements is explicitly described.
The fabrics described herein have anisotropic properties, i.e., they have different properties on the body side of the fabric and the face side of the fabric. This is accomplished by providing warp yarns having a first fiber content and fill yarns having a second fiber content different from the first fiber content. In other words, either the warp yarns and fill yarns do not have identical fibers or blends of fibers, or the warp yarns and fill yarns contain different amounts of the same fibers. By way of example, the warp yarns could contain 30% FR cellulosic fibers and 70% para-aramid fibers and the fill yarns could contain 65% FR cellulosic fibers and 35% para-aramid fibers (i.e., identical fibers but in different amounts). Alternatively, the warp yarns could contain 65% modacrylic fibers and 35% para-aramid fibers and the fill yarns could contain 65% FR cellulosic fibers and 35% para-aramid fibers (i.e., different blends of fibers). Exemplary fiber blends are discussed in more detail below.
Suitable fiber blends according to the present invention include any of the fiber blends contemplated in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/847,993 (the “'993 application”), entitled “Flame Resistant Fabrics and Garments Made From Same” and published as US-2008-0057807-A1, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,154 (the “'154 patent”), entitled “Patterned, Flame Resistant Fabrics and Method For Making Same” and issued Mar. 15, 2005, the entire contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference.
In some embodiments, the warp yarns and the fill yarns are formed from fibers or blends of fibers that include one or more of modacrylic fibers, cellulosic fibers (natural and synthetic, FR and non-FR), inherently FR fibers (e.g., aramids, PBI, PBO, etc.) and other non-FR fibers.
Suitable modacrylic fibers include, but are not limited to, PROTEX™ fibers (including but not limited to PROTEX W™, PROTEX C™ and PROTEX M™ fibers) available from Kaneka Corporation of Osaka, Japan, and SEF™ fibers, available from Solutia.
The cellulosic fibers may be natural or synthetic. Suitable natural cellulosic fibers include, but are not limited to, cotton, flax, hemp or blends thereof. The synthetic cellulosic fibers may be, but are not limited to, rayon, FR rayon, lyocell, cellulose acetate, or blends thereof. An example of a suitable rayon fiber is MODAL™ by Lenzing, available from Lenzing Fibers Corporation. Examples of lyocell fibers include TENCEL™, available from Lenzing Fibers Corporation. Examples of FR rayon fibers include Lenzing FR™, also available from Lenzing Fibers Corporation.
Cellulosic fibers (natural or synthetic) are not naturally resistant to flame. To increase the flame resistance of these fibers, one or more flame retardants may be incorporated into the fibers during the manufacturing process. Effective flame retardants include phosphorus compounds and antimony compounds. However, the cellulosic fibers need not always be rendered flame resistant. For example, if the cellulosic fibers are being blended with FR modacrylic fibers that control and counteract the flammability of the cellulosic fibers to prevent such fibers from burning, they need not be flame resistant. Use of non-FR cellulosic fibers instead of FR cellulosics significantly reduces the cost of fabrics made from such fibers. Again, however, both FR and non-FR cellulosic fibers are contemplated herein.
Other non FR fibers (natural or synthetic) can also be used as long as they are added in low enough levels (typically less than about 15% by weight) such that they will not detrimentally affect the thermal characteristics of fabric. Examples of such non-flame resistant fibers include, but are not limited to: (1) anti-static fibers to dissipate or minimize static, (2) anti-microbial fibers, (3) stretch fibers (e.g., spandex), (4) other fibers such as nylon and/or polyester fibers, and/or (5) other fibers that are added to the blends to improve the abrasion resistance of the fabrics.
Suitable inherently FR fibers include, but are not limited to, para-aramid fibers, meta-aramid fibers, polybenzimidazole (PBI) fibers, polybenzoxazole (PBO) fibers, melamine fibers, carbon fibers, pre-oxidized acrylic fibers, polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers, TANLON™ (available from Shanghai Tanlon Fiber Company), polyamide-imide fibers such as KERMEL™, and blends thereof. Examples of para-aramid fibers include KEVLAR™ (available from DuPont), TECHNORA™ (available from Teijin Twaron BV of Arnheim, Netherlands), and TWARON™ (also available from Teijin Twaron BV). Examples of meta-aramid fibers include NOMEX™ (available from DuPont) and CONEX™ (available from Teijin). An example of melamine fibers is BASOFIL™ (available from Basofil Fibers). An example of PAN fibers is Panox® (available from the SGL Group). As explained above, such inherently FR fibers impart the requisite thermal stability to the blend to enable fabrics made from such blends to be used in protective garments.
The yarns can be formed in conventional ways well known in the industry. The yarns may be spun yarns and can comprise a single yarn or two or more individual yarns that are twisted, or otherwise combined, together. In one embodiment, the yarns are air jet spun yarns. Typically, the yarns comprise one or more yarns that each have a yarn count in the range of approximately 5 to 60 cc. In other embodiments, the yarns comprise two yarns that are twisted together, each having a yarn count in the range of approximately 10 to 60 cc.
The FR fabrics formed with the blends disclosed herein preferably, but not necessarily, have a weight between approximately 3-12 ounces per square yard (“osy”) and more preferably between approximately 5-9 osy.
As discussed above, it may be desirable for the body side of the fabric to be relatively softer and more absorbent, and thus more comfortable, for contact with the skin of the wearer, and for the face side of the fabric to have improved durability at the expense of comfort (since comfort is not as much of a consideration on the face side of the fabric). Such fabric constructions can be achieved using weaving and knitting processes.
In a typical weaving process according to the present invention, the fibers on the face side of the fabric will predominantly comprise the warp yarns and the fibers on the body side of the fabric will predominantly comprise the fill yarns. The fabric may be constructed with the warp and fill yarns in a variety of ways, including but not limited to, one or more of twill weave (2×1, 3×1, etc.), satin weave (4×1, 5×1, etc.), and sateen weave constructions, or any other weave where yarn is predominantly more on one side of the fabric than the other side of the fabric. A person skilled in the art would be familiar with and could utilize suitable fabric constructions.
Notwithstanding the above, it will be understood that the fabric can be constructed such that the fibers on the face side of the fabric predominantly comprise the fill yarns and the fibers on the body side of the fabric predominantly comprise the warp yarns. In such a construction, a weave will be selected such that a comfortable fiber blend (e.g., a blend including one or more cellulosic fibers) is predominantly exposed on the body side of the fabric. A person skilled in the art would understand how to select an appropriate weave pattern so as to locate predominantly more of either the warp or fill yarns on one side of the fabric.
It should be noted that plain or ripstop weaves will typically not be used, because in such weaves there are an equal number of warp yarns and fill yarns on each side (i.e., the body side and face side) of the fabric, and both sides of the fabric would thus have the same properties.
It will also be recognized that any woven fabric will have both warp and fill yarns visible on each side of the fabric. Fabrics woven in accordance with the present invention, however, are woven such that more of either the warp yarns or the fill yarns are located on the face side of the fabric, and thus more of either the fill yarns or the warp yarns are located on the body side of the fabric. Thus, in an exemplary fabric construction in which more of the warp yarns are located on the face side of the fabric and more of the fill yarns are located, or exposed, on the body side of the fabric, the warp yarns are “predominantly” located, or exposed, on the face side of the fabric (even though some warp yarns would be visible from the body side of the fabric) and the fill yarns are “predominantly” located, or exposed, on the body side of the fabric (even though some fill yarns would be visible from the face side of the fabric).
In other embodiments of the invention, a knit fabric that has different properties on each side of the fabric can be constructed. Such a fabric could be constructed using a double-knit circular knitting machine. These machines have two needles, a dial needle and a cylinder needle, that work together to form the double-knit fabric. When utilized to make fabrics according to embodiments of the invention, different yarns can be used in each of the dial needle and cylinder needle such that the two yarns become inter-stitched with one yarn predominantly exposed on one side of the knit fabric and the other yarn predominantly exposed on the other side of the fabric. A yarn comprising cellulosic fibers could be knit into a fabric by at least one of the dial needle or cylinder needle so that a cellulosic-containing yarn is predominantly exposed on the body side of the fabric. Garments could be constructed from knit fabrics according to the embodiments described above.
As discussed above, in some embodiments the yarns of the present invention are formed from fibers or blends of fibers that include one or more of modacrylic fibers, cellulosic fibers (natural and synthetic, FR and non-FR), inherently FR fibers (e.g., aramids, PBI, PBO, etc.) and other non-FR fibers. In a more specific embodiment, a blend of fibers intended for a yarn that is predominantly exposed on the body side of a fabric includes approximately 20-80% by weight cellulosic fibers, approximately 0-55% by weight modacrylic fibers, approximately 0-80% by weight inherently FR fibers, and approximately 0-15% by weight other non-FR fibers (such as nylon).
In yet another embodiment, fibers or a blend of fibers intended for a yarn that is predominantly exposed on the face side of a fabric includes 0-100% of one or more of modacrylic fibers, cellulosic fibers (natural and synthetic, FR and non-FR), inherently FR fibers and other non-FR fibers. Thus, any suitable fiber or blend of fibers can be selected as long as the overall fabric remains flame resistant.
Dyeing and printing of such fabrics may be carried out in accordance with standard methods, all of which are known to those of skill in the art. Such methods include, but are not limited to, those dyeing and/or printing methods disclosed in the '154 patent and the '993 application. Although it will be recognized that certain fibers and fiber blends are more dyeable than others, it is desirable that both sides of the fabric be at least somewhat dyeable and printable. If only one side (i.e., the face side) of the fabric were dyeable and/or printable, the fabric is susceptible to “grin-through” or contrasting shades from the non-dyed/non-printed fibers that, though predominantly on the body side of the fabric, would also be at least partially visible on the face side of the fabric. Moreover, it is more difficult to produce a fabric that will pass military infra-red reflectance requirements if the fabric has “grin through.” Another benefit of having a garment, such as a shirt, that includes a fabric that is dyed and/or printed on both sides is the wearer can roll their shirt sleeves up and still have color or a print pattern on the body side of the fabric.
Suitable dyes for the fabrics described herein include direct, reactive, and vat dyes. Of these, vat dyes may be particularly useful for fabrics of the present invention because they satisfy military requirements GL-PD-07-12, Revision 4 (as referenced below).
In yet other embodiments, the fabric described herein may include at least 10% para-aramid fibers (including fibers in both the warp and fill yarns), and may include up to 30% para-aramid fibers.
In some embodiments, the yarns predominantly on the face side of the fabric (e.g., the warp yarns) include no more than about 15% para-aramid fibers and the yarns predominantly on the body side of the fabric (e.g., the fill yarns) include no more than about 60% para-aramid fibers and at least about 20% comfort fibers such as the cellulosic fibers described above. All, some or none of the comfort fibers may be treated with a flame retardant, as long as the overall fabric remains flame resistant and meets flame resistant standards described herein.
Fabrics described herein and dyed as described above may also have improved colorfastness as compared to previously known fabrics. Fabrics formed from fiber blends of the construction described in the previous paragraph may have relatively high para-aramid fiber content on the body side of the fabric (up to about 60%). Para-aramid fibers are desirable because they are inherently flame resistant and because they are high tenacity fibers that impart strength to the resulting yarns and fabrics. Para-aramid fibers, however, have a tendency to fibrillate after washing, and fibrillation of fiber blends having a high para-aramid content may impart a frosted appearance to the yarn. While such a frosted appearance may not be desirable if these blends were predominantly on the face side of the fabric, the frosted appearance is not a substantial issue when it occurs predominantly on the body side of the fabric.
In contrast to para-aramid fibers, meta-aramid fibers do not fibrillate after washing. As a result, it may be desirable to include meta-aramid fibers on the face side of the fabric for improved after-wash appearance.
Fabrics formed in accordance with the embodiments described herein preferably meet certain industrial and/or military standards for flame resistance. In particular, the fabrics preferably have an after-flame of less than 2 seconds and less than a 4-inch char length when tested in accordance with ASTM D 6413 (“Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles”). In addition, such fabrics preferably comply with National Fire Protection Association (“NFPA”) 2112 (“Standard on Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire”). In other embodiments, fabrics according to the present invention satisfy the U.S. Army requirements for the flame resistant Advanced Combat Uniform as specified in GL-PD-07-12, Revision 4. These test methods and standards are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The fabrics with anisotropic properties described herein, having different properties on the body side and face side of the fabric, can thus be customized so that a particular desirable property can be achieved on one side of the fabric without substantially affecting the properties on the other side of the fabric. For example, a cost effective fabric having desirable comfort, flame resistance, durability, thermal stability, and other properties can be optimized for one side of the fabric without substantially affecting other desirable properties on the other side of the fabric.
In addition, while the fibers described above for the warp yarns and fill yarns are primarily described as being a blend of fibers, it will be recognized that in some embodiments these yarns need not be blended at all. In other words, the warp yarns could be 100% of one fiber type and/or the fill yarns could be 100% of another fiber type. The warp and fill yarns should not, of course, each have 100% of the same fiber (e.g., 100% FR Rayon for both the warp and fill yarns), otherwise no matter how the fabric is woven both sides of the fabric would have the same properties.
The fabrics described herein can be incorporated into military or industrial garments, including but not limited to combat uniforms, shirts, jackets, trousers and coveralls.
In another embodiment, a method of making a fabric having anisotropic properties is provided. In the method, a woven fabric according to embodiments described above is formed such that the warp yarns have a fiber content that is different than the fiber content of the fill yarns. In other words, either the warp yarns and fill yarns do not have identical fibers or blends of fibers, or the warp yarns and fill yarns contain different amounts of the same fibers.
In yet another embodiment, a method of making a garment from a fabric having anisotropic properties is provided. In the method, a fabric formed according to embodiments described above is incorporated into a garment.
The present invention is further illustrated by way of the examples contained herein, which are provided for clarity of understanding. The exemplary embodiments should not to be construed in any way as imposing limitations upon the scope thereof. On the contrary, it is to be clearly understood that resort may be had to various other embodiments, modifications, and equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein, may suggest themselves to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention and/or the scope of the appended claims.
Fabrics having the fiber blends listed in Table 1 were prepared:
The warp and fill yarns of Fabric Nos. 1-6 each had a different fiber content, and the fill blend (i.e., predominantly exposed on the body side of the fabric) included cellulosic fibers (FR rayon).
The fabrics of Examples 3-6 were made using 64% warp yarns and 36% fill yarns. The fabrics of Examples 3 and 5 thus have approximately 19% para-aramid fibers (64% of 1.75% para-aramid fibers in the warp blend (5% of 35%) and 36% of 50% para-aramid fibers in the fill blend), and the fabrics of Examples 4 and 6 thus have approximately 16% para-aramid fibers (64% of 1.75% para-aramid fibers in the warp blend and 36% of 40% para-aramid fibers in the fill blend). Both sides of these fabrics are dyeable and/or printable to dark shades, and any frosting appearance due to washing in the para-aramid fibers is most pronounced in the fill blend, which is predominantly located on the body side of the fabric. The fabrics thus have good after-wash appearance.
Different arrangements of the components described above, as well as components and steps not described are possible. Similarly, some features and subcombinations are useful and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. Embodiments of the invention have been described for illustrative and not restrictive purposes, and alternative embodiments will become apparent to readers of this patent. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and various embodiments and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the claims below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/303,495, filed Nov. 23, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,898,821 on Dec. 2, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/783,368, filed May 19, 2010, abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/179,461, filed May 19, 2009, each of which is incorporated by this reference herein in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2333824 | Shoepf | Nov 1943 | A |
| 2696723 | Frith, Jr. | Dec 1954 | A |
| 3097442 | Willingham, Jr. | Jul 1963 | A |
| 3806959 | Gross | Apr 1974 | A |
| 4615934 | Ellison | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4668234 | Vance et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4920000 | Green | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5141542 | Fangeat et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5150476 | Statham et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5323815 | Barbeau et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5527597 | Stanhope et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5539928 | Aldridge | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5640718 | Aldridge | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5685015 | Aldridge | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694981 | Stanhope et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5724673 | Aldridge | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727401 | Statham | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5819316 | Aldridge | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824614 | Gadoury et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830574 | Gadoury | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5849648 | Kent et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858888 | Underwood | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5885307 | Gadoury | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891813 | Gadoury | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5920905 | Aldridge | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928971 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6132476 | Lunsford et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6247179 | Underwood et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6430754 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6547835 | Lunsford et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6626964 | Lunsford et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6668868 | Howland et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6693052 | Howland | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6735789 | Kelleher et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6818024 | Lunsford et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6840288 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6861378 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6867154 | Lunsford et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6974785 | Barbeau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7013496 | Dunn | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7065950 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7073538 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7156883 | Lovasic et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7284398 | Hubner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7393800 | Corner | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7402538 | Bader et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7589036 | Corner et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7634819 | Grey | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7676855 | Dunn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7854017 | Laton | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7862865 | Truesdale et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| RE42209 | Lunsford et al. | Mar 2011 | E |
| 8017532 | Okada | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8327469 | Curtis | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8347420 | Kruszewski et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8898821 | Stanhope et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 20010009832 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020016985 | Kelleher et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069453 | Kelleher et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030082972 | Monfalcone et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167580 | Lunsford et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226612 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228812 | Stanhope et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040029473 | McKee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045103 | Lunsford et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065072 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152378 | Stanhope et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050032449 | Lovasic et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050619 | Dunn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060820 | Lunsford et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064020 | Schuette et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245163 | Aneja et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287364 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060040575 | Kelleher et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084337 | Corner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143809 | Dunn | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264136 | Chiantese | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070184737 | Corner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249250 | Servajean | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080057807 | Tutterow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086798 | Allen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080148468 | Laton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152888 | Tutterow et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227352 | Byles et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080295232 | Truesdale, III et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090030111 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090139016 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178186 | Truesdale | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090226653 | Harris et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090255038 | Curtis | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100024103 | Kelleher et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100075557 | Shteiyer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112312 | Tutterow et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143683 | Chiou | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110010827 | Stanhope et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110023206 | Dunn | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138523 | Layson, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120031783 | Fay, III et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120090080 | Stanhope et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120183747 | Bader | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120210481 | Rock | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130216810 | Hines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005200963 | Mar 2005 | AU |
| 20 2004 005008 | Jun 2004 | DE |
| 20 2010 011 193 | Nov 2010 | DE |
| 20 2010 011193 | Nov 2010 | DE |
| 1020060122840 | Nov 2006 | KR |
| 1020070012391 | Jan 2007 | KR |
| 0220887 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 02052077 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 2004088023 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2006043958 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2007061423 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2010091476 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Supplementary Search Report, European Patent Application No. 12851301.7, mailed Jan. 20, 2015. |
| Partial Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/030111, mailed Apr. 23, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/066227 , Feb. 28, 2013, 9 pages. |
| “Lion Ready for Action”, Dec. 21, 2011. |
| “Tools & Technologies: Fire Service Prepares for Change in PPE Technology”, Feb. 1, 2012. |
| Examiner's Report, Australian Patent Application No. 2012318301, mailed Sep. 11, 2014. |
| Response to Rule 161 Communication, European Patent Application No. 12851301.7, filed Oct. 6, 2014. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150297919 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61179461 | May 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13303495 | Nov 2011 | US |
| Child | 14520056 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12783368 | May 2010 | US |
| Child | 13303495 | US |
