Patent Application
20230365817
One major type of coating for wood products consists of water-based acrylic resins, i.e., a coating formulation in which the resin acting as a binder is a homopolymer or a copolymer of acrylic acids, methacrylic acids or esters thereof, formulated in water. Water-based acrylic resins are useful in protecting wood products, owing to their ability to adhere to wood and form water-resistant coating. Another important type of coating in the wood coatings market includes polyurethane dispersions (i.e., water-based polyurethane resins).
Apart from the resin and water, a coating formulation may contain pigments and additives, e.g., wetting and dispersing agents, coalescing agents, defoamers and rheology modifiers. Another additive to be considered in coating formulations is a flame retarding agent. One important category of flame retardants consists of brominated flame retardants. A number of studies were reported evaluating the performance of brominated flame retardants added to water-based acrylic resin for use in the wood coatings market.
US 2015/0111052 illustrates the use of a liquid halogenated phosphate ester as a major flame retardant in acrylic coatings for wood, alongside a brominated flame retardant as a secondary component. The formulations of US 2015/0111052 further contain a flame retardant which undergoes endothermic decomposition (alumina trihydrate (ATH) or magnesium hydroxide (MDH)). The brominated flame retardants tested in US 2015/0111052 include brominated bisphenol A (used in a small amount) and brominated polyol (a liquid flame retardant). The addition of the (mostly liquids) flame retardants to the coating formulation was achieved in a straightforward manner, through pre-mixing with the acrylic dispersion.
As opposed to the approach shown in US 2015/0111052, based mainly on liquid flame retardants, formulating large amounts of solid brominated flame retardants as coatings can be challenging. The approach was demonstrated in US 3,877,974 and recently in US 10,626,289, illustrating incorporation of water-insoluble solid brominated flame retardant into water based acrylic/polyurethane coating formulations. In US 10,626,289, tribromophenol end-capped brominated epoxy polymer of the formula:
[classified as low molecular weight brominated epoxy polymer, e.g., m~ 1-5; 1000 < Molecular Weight (MW) < 5000; e.g., in a pulverized form, for example, d50<5 µm, d90< 10 µm and d99< 30 µm, determined by laser diffraction particle size analysis] was formulated as an aqueous dispersion, which was subsequently mixed with a commercial acrylic or polyurethane resin to form a varnish formulation. The varnish was applied on wood to give transparent/translucent coatings. The coated wood samples achieved good results in flammability tests.
The action of brominated flame retardants incorporated into combustible substances is almost always augmented by metallic oxides, especially antimony oxides, which act synergistically with brominated flame retardants. Indeed, the formulations illustrated in the publications mentioned above included metallic oxide synergists. Specifically, antimony oxides were the additives of choice in both US 2015/0111052 (antimony trioxide) and US 10,626,289 (antimony pentoxide).
We have now studied the combustion performance of wood products coated with formulations based on the varnish described in US 10,626,289. Coatings were evaluated according to the Single Burning Item (SBI) test set out in EN 13823, which measures the rates of heat and smoke release produced by a test specimen which consists of two vertically positioned rectangular wood boards (1500 mm × 1000 mm and 1500 mm × 500 mm), joined perpendicularly along their equal side to create a 90° corner. The test evaluates the performance of a product placed in a small room, under exposure to a flame produced by a single ignition source located adjacent to the test product (for example, to simulate a waste-paper basket in a corner of the room). Parameters measured by the SBI test include the fire growth rate index; the total heat release over the first ten minutes after the ignition of the burner; the smoke growth rate index; and the total smoke production over the first ten minutes after burner ignition.
The coating formulation of US 10,626,289 that was subjected to the SBI test is designated herein BER/APO (BER stands for the low molecular weight brominated epoxy resin flame retardant with the chemical structure depicted above, APO stands for the antimony pentoxide synergist). In addition, we also tested a ternary formulation, which included a combination of the low-molecular weight brominated epoxy polymer, antimony pentoxide and magnesium hydroxide (designated BER/APO/Mg(OH)2). The ternary system showed some improvement over the basic coating formulation BER/APO of US 10,626,289. However, much to our surprise, antimony oxide-free water-based acrylic coating comprising the low-molecular weight brominated epoxy polymer and magnesium hydroxide (designated herein BER/Mg (OH)2) ) performed consistently better than all the other coatings evaluated in the study.
Apart from the SBI test mentioned above, in which the flammability of coated (flame retarded) medium density fiberboard (MDF) samples was studied, we used a cone calorimeter test (a small-scale test) to examine the burning properties of coated pine wood samples. The trend observed in the SBI and cone calorimeter tests for the two types of wood was the same: the antimony oxide-free coating, based on BER/Mg (OH) 2, was more efficient than the coating which was flame retarded by the ternary, antimony oxide containing combination BER/APO/Mg(OH)2.
The cone calorimeter test served us to evaluate different brominated flame retardants (in particular brominated polymeric flame retardants), formulated with either Mg (OH)2 (MDH) or Al(OH)3 (ATH) in acrylate and polyurethane based coatings. In the cone calorimeter test, radiant heat is projected onto a sample before ignition and during the burning of the sample, and several parameters, especially parameters related to the heat release profile of the tested sample, are measured. An effective flame retardant system should exhibit low values of peak and average heat release rate (HRR) and the lowest maximum average rate of heat emission (MARHE). The experimental work conducted in support of this invention shows that in the coating systems described herein, MDH and ATH can offset the exclusion of antimony oxide, e.g., antimony pentoxide. That is, the efficiency of combinations consisting of brominated polymeric flame retardant/MDH (or ATH) and brominated polymeric flame retardant/APO were found to be at least comparable, across the range of brominated polymeric flame retardant tested by us. Because the common practice of using antimony oxide synergist alongside brominated flame retardants may be objected to due to environmental considerations, the substitution of APO by MDH or ATH is highly desired.
Accordingly, a primary aspect of the invention is a coating composition formulated as an aqueous dispersion comprising water, a binder (for example, an acrylic resin, a polyurethane resin), particles of a brominated polymeric flame retardant and particles of magnesium hydroxide or aluminum trihydrate.
The brominated polymeric flame retardant is, for example:
Preferred are tribromophenol end-capped brominated epoxy polymers of the formula IA:
The polymer (abbreviated PBBPA) is produced by polymerizing the corresponding monomer pentabromobenzyl acrylate, either in bulk (in an extruder at a temperature in the range from 120° C. to 290° C. as described in US 4,996,276), or in solution, see US 4,128,709, US 6,028,156 and US 9,018,324. The polymer is also available on the market, being sold by ICL-IP (FR-1025).
iii) brominated polystyrene, represented by formula III:
(n=degree of polymerization; m= 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5)
The polymer is prepared by methods known in the art (see US 4,879,353 and US 5,532,322). Suitable grades have weight average molecular weight in the range of about 500,000-600,000, with bromine content preferably exceeding 60 or even 65 % by weight (that is, average of 2-3 bromine atoms per aromatic ring in the polymer backbone chain). Such polymers, in the form of a free-flowing powder, are available on the market, e.g., from ICL-IP (FR 803P).
iv) brominated poly[styrene-co-butadiene], e.g., brominated polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene, shown below (Formula IV):
where x, y and z indicate the numbers of the three types of repeat units, respectively. Such brominated products, in particular, polystyrene-block-brominated polybutadiene-block-polystyrene, are commercially available (e.g., FR-122P from ICL-IP) .
Combinations of brominated nonpolymeric flame retardants with MDH were found to be less efficient than the corresponding combinations with APO. That is, MDH is not as effective as APO in coating formulations that are flame retarded by “small” brominated compounds, such as decabromodiphenyl ethane (abbreviated DPDPE; available commercially as FR-1410 from ICL-IP). These “small” brominated compounds lean heavily on the presence of APO in coating formulations, as shown by the results reported below.
Hereinafter, a brominated polymeric flame retardant is abbreviated BFR. The preferred flame retardant, namely, the end-capped brominated epoxy polymer of Formula Ia, is abbreviated BER.
Preferred coating formulations of the invention comprise: from 10 to 50 % by weight of water, e.g., 20 (or 25) to 45%; from 10 to 35 % by weight of binder, e.g., 15 (or 20) to 30%; from 5 to 25 % by weight of BFR; e.g., 8 (or 10) to 20%; and from 2 to 10 % by weight of Mg (OH) 2 or Al(OH)3 e.g., 3 to 7%.
The formulation further contains customary coating additives. Major types of additives may include:
Weight concentrations are based upon total formulation, unless indicated otherwise.
The composition of the invention is substantially free of metal oxide synergist of the formula M2On where M is a metal, e.g., synergists such as Sb2O3 or Sb2O5. By “substantially free” is meant that the concentration of the synergist (e.g., antimony trioxide or antimony pentoxide) in the composition is well below the acceptable amount used in conjunction with brominated additives in coating formulations for wood products, e.g., not more than 3% by weight, more preferably, less than 1.0 % by weight, e.g., up to 0.9% and even more preferably from 0.0 to 0.09 % by weight (based on the total weight of the composition). Most preferably, the compositions of the invention are totally devoid of metal oxide synergists.
The coating formulation is prepared in two steps. In the first step, the solid flame retardants [BFR and Mg (OH) 2 or Al(OH)3] are dispersed in water to form a homogeneous FR dispersion (FR is an abbreviation of flame retardant). In the second step, the FR aqueous dispersion, containing BFR and Mg (OH) 2 or Al(OH)3 is combined with a water-based (e.g., acrylate or polyurethane) resin.
To incorporate the pair of solid flame retardants into water, it is more convenient to start with the magnesium hydroxide powder and then continue with the BFR powder, because their processing may require different conditions. Suitable grades of magnesium hydroxide consist of micron or sub-micron particles (for example, with the particle size distribution of d50≤5 µm (e.g., d50≤3 µm, more preferably d50≤2 µm) and d90≤ 10 µm (e.g., d90 ≤ 6 µm, more preferably or d90 ≤ 4 µm), measured by laser diffraction, e.g., by Malvern Mastersizer 2000 using isopropanol. Commercial products suitable for use include FR-20-100 from ICL-IP, such as the grade named FR-20-100-S10. Suitable aluminum trihydrate exhibits average median particle diameter from 7 to 10 µm and BET surface area from 1 to 3 m2/g, such as SB-432 from HUBER with the average median particle diameter of 9 µm and BET surface area of 2 m2/g. The description that follows relates to formulating Mg (OH) 2 with BFR in water-based acrylic coatings. The description, however, applies equally to Al(OH)3 instead of Mg (OH) 2 unless otherwise specifically indicated.
The Mg (OH) 2 powder is added to a vessel that was previously charged with water, coalescing agent (e.g., to water/propylene glycol mixture, proportioned 3:1 to 1.2:1 by weight), and a dispersing agent. The wettability of magnesium hydroxide in water is fairly good, and therefore the presence of a wetting agent may not be necessary at this stage. A coalescing agent and a defoamer may also be incorporated into the water prior to the addition of the FR powders. To disperse these auxiliary additives in water (the dispersing, wetting, coalescing and defoaming agents), usually relatively low shear force is required, generated by a dissolver stirrer operating at <750 rpm. Incorporation of the magnesium hydroxide powder into the water can be achieved with the aid of a high-shear or ultrahigh shear disperser, for example, revolutions per minute (rpm) of the mixing shaft is not less than 10,000, e.g., operating in a range of rotor tip speeds between 3,000 and 5,000 ft/min. The Mg (OH) 2 powder is added gradually, under a first agitation rate, say, from 7,500 to 12,500 rpm. After the addition of the total amount of magnesium hydroxide is completed, the mixture is homogenized for some time, with the high-shear disperser operating at a higher speed range, e.g., from 15,000 to 25,000 rpm.
Next, BFR is incorporated into the FR suspension. For example, a powder with particle size distribution of d50<5 µm (e.g., d50<4 µm) and preferably also d90< 12 µm (e.g., d90<10 µm, d90<9 µm, d90 <7 µm) and even more preferably also d99< 40 µm (e.g., d99< 35 µm, d99<30 µm, d99<25 µm). Suitable pulverized forms may be produced by subjecting a BFR to particle size reduction with the aid of a jet mill (dry milling) to achieve particle size distribution as set out above (measured by Malvern Mastersizer 2000 in water (3 minutes ultrasonic treatment, 500 psi, 1250 rpm)). A suitable commercially available product is TexFRon® 4002 from ICL-IP (it is the BER of Formula Ia).
When the BFR has a low softening point (which is the case for the BER of Formula Ia), then its addition is not carried out under operation of a very high speed, high shear disperser as set out above for Mg (OH) 2. Rather, a lower speed instrument (e.g., low to medium, such as < 3,000 rpm, e.g., < 1,500 rpm) may be used to enable the formation of homogeneous FR dispersion. To improve its storage stability, a thickener may be added to the BFR/Mg (OH) 2 dispersion, to minimize the settling of FR’s with the passage of time. However, if little time is allowed to elapse before the BFR/Mg(OH)2 dispersion is mixed with the binder (e.g., acrylic or polyurethane) resin, then the presence of a thickener in the FR dispersion is not mandatory; the thickener can just be added to the finished coating formulation.
The weight ratios between the components of the FR suspension, namely, water, Mg (OH) 2 or Al(OH)3, BFR, coalescing agent, dispersing agent (sometimes a single component serves a dual function of dispersant/wetting agent) and a defoamer are preferably in the ranges of 100: 20-40: 90-120: 50-75: 5-10: 1-5, respectively.
In the next step, the FR suspension is combined with a water-based binder resin (e.g., water-based acrylic or polyurethane resin).
Acrylic resin for use in the present invention usually falls into two categories (the term “acrylic”, as used herein, is meant to include “methacrylic”):
In both categories, the acrylic monomers structural units of the resin can be selected from alkyl acrylate and alkyl methacrylate (alkyl esters of acrylic acids or methacrylic acid), where the alkyl group is preferably C1-C5 alkyl, e.g., methyl, ethyl, propyl (e.g., n-propyl) and butyl (e.g., n-butyl). The parent acid — acrylic acid or methacrylic acid —may also be used in small amounts to provide the resin. The acrylic monomers may be optionally functionalized.
The water-based acrylic resin for use in the present invention may be provided in different forms. Two major forms are: acrylic latex (which consists of an emulsion of acrylic resin particles in water; film is formed after application of the coating formulation onto the wood product upon water evaporation); and
cross-linking acrylic resin formulated in water, especially self-crosslinking acrylic resins, including ambient temperature self-crosslinking acrylic resins. Self-crosslinking functionality may be achieved in different ways known in the art.
The experimental results reported below indicate that self-crosslinking acrylic copolymer formulated in water (from 40 to 60% solid content, e.g., from 45 to 55%) in the form of slightly alkaline dispersion available, for example, from Alberdingk Boley, is compatible with the FR dispersion and the two mixtures can be combined to form an efficient flame retardant coating formulation.
Before it is mixed with the BFR/Mg(OH)2 dispersion to form the finished coating formulation, it is beneficial to add to the commercially available water-based acrylic resin one or more dispersing agents, a substrate wetting agent and a defoamer, e.g., in the following weight ratios 100: 1-5: 0.5-5 : 1-5 (100 parts by weight of a water-based acrylic resin include the water component of the commercial resin). These additives are readily incorporated into commercial water based acrylic resins, for example with the aid of a dissolver stirrer. A dispersing agent of choice for this part of the preparation (that is, to be incorporated into the water-based acrylic resin before the addition of the FR dispersion) is an anionic dispersant, especially a salt of polyacrylic acid, e.g., sodium polyacrylate.
The FR dispersion is added to the water-based acrylic resin dispersion described immediately hereinabove, usually in 3:7 to 7:3 weight ratio, e.g., 4:6 to 6:4, for example, roughly equal quantities of the FR dispersion and the water based acrylic resin are mixed to form a homogeneous formulation, followed by the addition of a rheology additive, e.g., which functions as a thickener and stabilizes the formulation. The density of the formulation of the invention varies from 1.10 to 1.20 kg/m3, e.g., from 1.15 to 1.17 kg/m3.
Accordingly, another aspect of the invention is a process for preparing a flame retardant coating formulation for wood, comprising incorporating magnesium hydroxide powder (or alumina trihydrate powder) and BFR powder into a water-based binder (e.g., acrylate, polyurethane) dispersion, wherein the coating formulation is substantially free of metal oxide synergist.
A specific process comprises the steps of:
The BFR/Mg(OH)2 or BFR/Al(OH)3 aqueous suspensions obtained in step 1b, comprising water, Mg (OH) 2 or Al (OH)3, BFR, a coalescing agent (e.g., propylene glycol), a dispersing agent (e.g., an agent serving a dual function of dispersant/wetting agent) and a defoamer, proportioned 100: 10-50 (e.g., 20-40) : 70-140 (e.g., 90-120): 50-90 (e.g., 50-75) : 5-10: 1-5, by weight, respectively, forms another aspect of the invention.
Dispersant(s) are present in the coating formulation at a concentration from 0.1 to 3.0 % by weight each, based on total formulation. The use of two or more dispersants is beneficial: a first dispersing agent (e.g., nonionic) is incorporated into the water before addition of the FR powders, and is also added to the water-based binder (e.g., acrylic) resin component, together with a second dispersing agent (anionic), before the binder is combined with the FR dispersion. Polymeric dispersants are preferred, e.g., nonionic acrylate copolymer can serve as the first dispersing agent (such as DISPERBYK®-2010, available in an emulsion form). A salt of polyacrylic acid (e.g., sodium polyacrylate, such as LOPON® 800 from ICL) or a salt of polyphosphoric acid (e.g., sodium polyphosphate, such as Calgon® N from ICL) can serve as the second dispersant (the anionic dispersant).
The good effect of a combination of nonionic and anionic surfactants as dispersing agent system on the storage stability of the formulations of the invention is shown in the experimental work reported below. Usually accelerated testing of paints/coating formulations is carried out at elevated temperature for a period of a few weeks and then the formulation is visually examined. The results indicate that in the absence of an anionic surfactant, the formulation transforms into a non-fluid mass (gel or solid). In the presence of an anionic surfactant, however, only little, temporary separation was observed at the end of the test period, as the formulation could be re-dispersed easily to restore its flowability and functionality. The ratio between the nonionic and anionic surfactants is usually in the range of 10:1 to 5:2 weight ratio, e.g., 5: 1 to 1:1.
Wetting agent(s) may be added to wet the particles of the flame retardants. Wetting agents are usually added at a concentration from 0.1 to 1.5 % by weight each based on total formulation, and include, for example nonionic surfactants such as alcohol alkoxylates and anionic surfactants such as alkyl aromatic sulfonates, e.g., sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate. When used, the wetting agents are incorporated into water before addition of the FR powders. However, some dispersing agents possess the necessary wetting properties and hence a single additive can be used, such as DISPERBYK-2010.
Coalescing agents (usually added at a concentration from 5.0 to 15.0 % by weight based on total formulation) may be, for example, hydrophilic coalescing agents, e.g., propylene glycol or water-soluble alkyl ethers of propylene glycols, such as di-propylene glycol monomethyl ether. Coalescing agents are usually incorporated into water before addition of the FR powders.
Defoaming agents (usually from 0.1 to 1.5 % by weight each) may be, for example, silicone-containing defoamers, or long chain decyne diols ethoxylated derivatives. Defoamers are incorporated into water before addition of the FR powders and can be separately added to the water-based binder before it is combined with the FR dispersion.
Substrate wetting agents, to improve the wettability of the wood substrate by the coating formulation (usually from 0.1 to 1.0 % by weight each) may be, for example, polyether-modified silicone surfactants, sometimes available in solution form in glycol and/or ether solvents. A substrate wetting agent is added to the water-based binder (e.g., acrylic resin), before it is mixed with the FR dispersion to form the coating formulation.
Rheology additive (usually from 0.1 to 3.0% by weight each), e.g., thickening and anti-settling agent, for example, liquid rheology additives such as a solution of modified urea (in N-methyl pyrrolidone), or other types, polyurethanes, polymer modified clays and acrylic emulsions. Thickeners are usually the last added component, i.e., they are incorporated into the finished formulation.
Other types of additives include preservatives, stabilizers, pH buffers, curing agents, sequestering agents, suspending agents, detergents, and of course dyes and pigments.
As mentioned above, water-based polyurethane dispersions can also benefit from the addition of the BFR/Mg(OH)2 dispersion to offer flame retardant polyurethane-based coatings. Examples of commercial polyurethane dispersions include ALBERDINGK® U9600 VP - Aliphatic polyester polyurethane dispersion and ALBERDINGK® PUR MATT 970 - (aliphatic) polyurethane dispersion. Another type of aqueous dispersions used in wood coating is based on vinyl acetate copolymer dispersions, such as ALBERDINGK® VA 294.
The composition of the invention can be applied to coat/paint wood (oak, pine, beech, cherry) or wood products (e.g., engineered wood) by conventional techniques, e.g., with the aid of a sprayer, a brush, a roller-coater, to achieve loading levels of about 70 g/m2 to 300 g/m2, e.g., from 100 g/m2 to 200 g/m2, to create one or more coating layers onto the wooden surface. Wood products include glulam, plywood, parallel strand lumber (PSL), oriented strand board (OSB), oriented strand lumber (OSL), laminated veneer lumber (LVL), laminated strand lumber (LSL), particleboard, medium density fiberboard (MDF), cross-laminated timber, and hardboard, as described in US 2015/0111052 and US 10,626,289. The experimental results reported below indicate that the flammability of coated MDF and pine wood was effectively reduced with the aid of the flame retardants described herein.
Preferred antimony-free coating formulations of the invention, which are flame retarded by incorporating BFR/MDH or BFR/ATH aqueous suspension into commercial water-based acrylic or polyurethane resins, and preferred additives present in such formulations, are set out in Table A.
A method of reducing the flammability of wood and wood products, comprising applying the flame retardant aqueous dispersion (i.e., the flame retardant coating formulation) of the invention to the surface of a wood or a wood product, to form a coating thereon, forms another aspect of the invention.
A coating created by the formulation of the invention may be transparent (i.e., the texture and/or the wooden color can still be easily observed in the final coated wooden substrate) or translucent, (i.e., the wooden color can be seen through the coating of the invention to some extent, while giving rise to a coated substrate having a mat finishing). The transparency of the film of the invention can be measured using DATACOLOR 650. The transparent film of the invention is characterized by having transparency values of between 30% and 90% as measured by DATACOLOR 650, e.g., 40%-80%, for example, 55%-80% as measured by DATACOLOR 650.
Although the invention is primarily directed to coatings based on brominated polymeric flame retardants, one nonpolymeric brominated flame retardant which could benefit from the replacement of antimony oxide by magnesium hydroxide in coating formulations is Tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine, represented by Formula V:
The preparation of tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine is generally based on the reaction of cyanuric chloride with 2,4,6-tribromophenolate under various conditions well known in the art (see, for example, US 5,907,040, 5,965,731 and 6,075,142). The flame retardant is also commercially available from ICL-IP under the name FR-245. The results reported below indicate that unlike the brominated nonpolymeric compound DPDPE, which depends strongly on the presence of antimony oxide synergist, coatings which are flame retarded by FR-245/Mg(OH)2 exhibit reduced flammability, akin to coatings which are flame retarded by FR-245/APO and FR-245/APO/Mg(OH)2.
Accordingly, another aspect of the invention is a flame retardant coating formulation, comprising: from 10 to 50 % by weight of water, e.g., 20 (or 25) to 45%; from 10 to 35 % by weight of binder, e.g., 15 (or 20) to 30%; from 5 to 25 % by weight of tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine; e.g., 8 (or 10) to 20%; and from 2 to 10 % by weight of Mg (OH) 2 or Al(OH)3 e.g., 3 to 7%.
A suspension which comprises water, Mg (OH) 2 or Al (OH)3, tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine, a coalescing agent (such as propylene glycol), a dispersing agent (sometimes a single component serves a dual function of dispersant/wetting agent) and a defoamer, proportioned 100: 20-40: 90-120: 50-75: 5-10: 1-5, by weight, respectively, forms aspect of the invention.
Materials used for preparing the coating formulations are tabulated in Table 1 (FR means flame retardant):
Water (1313.5 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (869.5 g) and DISPERBYK 2010 (107 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). BYK 093 (18.5 g) was slowly added. Next, TexFRon® 4002 (1369 g) was added slowly to the mixture, which was maintained under stirring to form homogeneous suspension. Lastly, BYK 420 (22.5 g) was added. Stirring was continued for an additional 30 minutes.
Water (1180.3 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (777.0 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (96.2 g) and BYK 093 (18.5 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, magnesium hydroxide (407.0 g of FR-20-100-S10 grade from ICL-IP) was introduced to the vessel under high shear rate at 10000 rpm. After the total amount of the magnesium hydroxide was added, the rate was increased to 20000 rpm for five minutes, to obtain a homogeneous suspension (high shear disperser was T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX instrument, equipped with S 25 KV - 25F dispersing tool, from IKA).
Lastly, TexFRon® 4002 (1221 g) was added slowly to the suspension, which was maintained under stirring (with the dissolver stirrer at 1000 rpm for twenty minutes) to afford the final suspension.
Alberdingk 2523 (3116.80 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (32 g), BYK 346 (9.60 g) and BYK 093 (25.60) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1300 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). After ten minutes, BYK 420 (16 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes.
Alberdingk 2523 (1644.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (32.0 g), BYK 346 (9.6 g) and BYK 093 (25.60) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1300 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER of Preparation 1 (1472 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (16 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes.
Alberdingk 2523 (1446.4 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (32.0 g), BYK 346 (9.6 g) and BYK 093 (25.6) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1300 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER of Preparation 1 (1472 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 198.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel and stirred for five minutes. Lastly, BYK 420 (16 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 minutes.
Alberdingk 2523 (1280.0 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (32.0 g), BYK 346 (9.6 g) and BYK 093 (25.60) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1300 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 2 (1638 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring (starting at 1300 rpm, later switching to 700 rpm) to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 198.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel and stirred for five minutes. Lastly, BYK 420 (16 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes.
Alberdingk 2523 (1468.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (32.0 g), BYK 346 (9.6 g), BYK 093 (25.60) and Lopon 800 (16 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1300 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 2 (1638.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (16 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 min.
The coating formulations of Examples 1 to 5 were evaluated according to the EN 13823 Single Burning Item (SBI) Test.
A coating formulation was applied to an assembly consisting of two vertically positioned rectangular fire-retarded MDF plates (1500 mm x 1000 mm x 18 mm, and 1500 mm x 500 mm x 18 mm, produced by QINGDAO EONCRED WOOD CO., LTD), joined along their equal side to create a 90° corner. The coating was applied by a brush. Three coats were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the wood assembly was dried for sixteen hours prior to testing.
Details of the SBI test can be found, for example, in http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/innofirewood/stateoftheart/datab ase/euroclass/euroclass.html. Briefly, the test was carried out in a small room (1=3 m × w=3 m × h=2.4 m), in which two vertical non-combustible boards served to hold the test specimen (the specimen holder consists of wings of sizes 1.0 m × 1.5 m and 0.5 m × 1.5 m positioned in a right-angled corner configuration, i.e., corresponding in shape and size to the test specimen). A propane gas burner was placed at the bottom of the 90° C. corner of the test specimen to produce heat output of 30 kW. Combustion gases generated during a test were collected by a hood and drawn to an exhaust duct equipped with sensors to measure the temperature, light attenuation, O2 and CO2 mole fractions and flow-induced pressure difference in the duct. The performance of the specimen was evaluated for an exposure period of 20 minutes. During the test, the heat release rate was measured by using oxygen consumption calorimetry. The smoke production rate was measured in the exhaust duct based on the attenuation of light. Falling of flaming droplets or particles was visually observed during the first 600 seconds of the heat exposure on the specimen.
The compositions of the five coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 2 below, together with the results of the SBI test:
To better illustrate trends observed in the study, the results of two test variables (Fire Growth Rate Index, FIGRA; and Smoke Growth Rate Index; SMOGRA) are presented graphically in the form of bar diagrams in
In
In
To investigate the effect of magnesium hydroxide on the optical properties of the coatings, the formulations of Example 1 (reference; FR-free formulation), Example 2 (comparative; BER-added formulation), and Example 5 (of the invention; BER/Mg (OH)2-added formulation) were applied on a glass surface using an applicator (byko-drive - BYK Gardner GmbH). The tested coating formulation was poured into a rectangular shallow receptable (Film Applicator with 4 Gaps, frame-style by BYK), which moved along the surface; the bottom and top bases of the receptable were open, such that the formulation was spread on the surface when the receptable moved, creating a wet film). After 24 h the dry film was removed from the glass. Haze and transparency were determined using DATACOLOR 650. Results are tabulated below.
It is seen that addition of magnesium hydroxide (MDH) to the coating, to aid the brominated flame retardant, does not impair the optical properties of the coating.
The coating formulations of Examples 2, 4 and 5 were applied om pine wood samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
10 mm thick, square shaped pine wood samples (100 mm x 100 mm) were coated by the formulations of Examples 2, 4 and 5. The coatings were applied by a brush - three coats (of the same formulation) were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the samples were dried for at least a week prior to testing.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated samples were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 4 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test.
Parameters related to the heat release rate (HRR) were given the main consideration. An effective flame-retardant system should show low values of peak and average HRR and a low MARHE (Maximum Average Rate of Heat Emission). HRR curves versus time are shown in
The results obtained for coated pine wood samples by the cone calorimeter test confirm the trend observed in the SBI test for MDF samples (reported in Example 6). That is, the antimony oxide-free coating of Example 5, based on BER/Mg(OH)2, showed the best performance, i.e., better than the coating which was flame retarded by the ternary, antimony oxide containing combination BER/APO/Mg(OH)2.
The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of different dispersing agents in maintaining the stability of the coating formulations at accelerated storage conditions. Three formulations were made by adding an aqueous suspension consisting of: 31.9 % water; 21 % propylene glycol; 2.6% BYK 2010; 0.5 % BYK 093; 33 % TexFRon® 4002 and 11% Mg(OH)2 (prepared by the Procedure of Preparation 2), to the acrylic resin in the manner described in Example 5, using the same formulation aids, but testing three types of dispersing agents:
Usually accelerated testing of paints/coating formulations is carried out at elevated temperature for a period of a few weeks and then the formulation is visually examined. The results tabulated in Table 5 indicate that long-term storage stability of the brominated flame retardant/Mg(OH)2 formulation was achieved owing to a combination of a nonionic dispersing agent and an anionic dispersing agent, e.g., one that is based on polyphosphate or polyacrylate, in the form of their sodium salts. In the absence of the anionic surfactant, the formulation transformed into a non-fluid mass (gel or solid). In the presence of an anionic surfactant, little separation was observed at the end of the test (the four and eight weeks of test periods correspond to one and two years of storage under normal conditions, respectively), but the formulation was re-dispersed easily to restore its flowability and functionality.
As seen in Table 5, a suspension exhibiting especially prolonged stability is achieved with the aid of anionic dispersant based on polyacrylate. This has been further confirmed by ~ one-year test under normal (room temperature) conditions.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 100 g of the BER/Al(OH)3 aqueous dispersion is as follows.
Water (31.3 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (21.0 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (2.6 g) and BYK 093 (0.5 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, alumina trihydrate (11 g of SB-432 from HUBER) was introduced to the vessel under high shear rate at 14000 rpm. After the total amount of the alumina trihydrate was added, TexFRon® 4002 (33 g) was added slowly to the suspension, which was maintained under stirring with the dissolver stirrer until homogeneous suspension was formed. Stirring continued for an additional 30 minutes to afford the final suspension.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 250 g of the BER/Al(OH)3 -containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (114.75 g) was added to a 5L plastic jar, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (2.5 g), BYK 346 (0.75 g), BYK 093 (2 g) and Lopon 800 (1.25 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER/Al(OH)3 of Preparation 3 (128 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.75 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring at 500 rpm for 30 min.
The coating formulations of Examples 1, 5 and 10 were applied on MDF samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK]] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated samples were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 6 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test.
The results show that coatings based on BER/MDH and BER/ATH show nearly comparable average HRR and MARHE, with an advantage of the former type of coating in relation to the peak HRR.
For 200 g formulation: Alberdingk PU 9600VP (194.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (2 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and BYK 093 (1.6 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). After ten minutes, BYK 420 (1 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes.
For 200 g formulation: Alberdingk PU 9600VP (102.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (2 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and BYK 093 (1.6) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER of Preparation 1 (92 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (1 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes.
For 200 g formulation: Alberdingk PU 9600VP (90.4 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (2 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and BYK 093 (1.6 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER of Preparation 1 (92 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 12.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel and stirred for five minutes. Lastly, BYK 420 (1 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 minutes.
For 200 g formulation: Alberdingk PU 9600VP (91.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of DISPERBYK 2010 (2 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), BYK 093 (1.6 g) and Lopon 800 (1 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). After ten minutes, the aqueous suspension of BER/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 2 (102.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 min.
The coating formulations of Examples 12, 13, 14 and 15 were applied on MDF samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
18 mm thick, square shaped MDF samples (100 mm × 100 mm) were coated by the formulation of Examples 12, 13, 14 and 15. The coatings were applied by a brush - three coats (of the same formulation) were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the samples were dried for at least a week prior to testing.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK]] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated samples were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 7 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test. HRR curves versus time are shown in
The results indicate that polyurethane coatings could benefit from the combination of the invention, BER/Mg(OH)2, which performed very well in retarding the flammability of coated MDF samples, exhibiting lower HRR parameters compared to the conventional BER/antimony oxide combination.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 400 g of the FR-122P aqueous dispersion is as follows.
Water (168.9 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (111.8 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (8.4 g), BYK 093 (1.6 g) and Supragil WP (2 g) under stirring at a rate of 400-900 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, FR-122P (106.2 g) was added slowly to the mixture, which was maintained under stirring to form homogeneous suspension. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.2 g) was added slowly. Stirring was continued for additional 30 minutes at 500 ppm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 400 g of the FR-122P/Mg(OH)2 aqueous dispersion is as follows.
Water (153.5 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (101.2 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (10.8 g) and BYK 093 (1.6 g) and Supragil WP (2.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 400-900 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, magnesium hydroxide (44 g of FR-20-100-S10 grade from ICL-IP) was introduced to the vessel under high shear rate at 14000 rpm. (high shear disperser was T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX instrument, equipped with S 25 KV - 25F dispersing tool, from IKA).
Lastly, FR-122P (86.9 g) was added slowly to the suspension, which was maintained under stirring (with the dissolver stirrer at 500 rpm) until homogeneous suspension was formed. Stirring continued for additional thirty minutes.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-122P-containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (111.1 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and DISPERBYK 2010 (1.4 g), under stirring at a rate of 400 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-122P of Preparation 4 (84.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.0 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-122P/APO-containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (98.7 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and DISPERBYK 2010 (1.4 g) under stirring at a rate of 400 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-122P of Preparation 4 (84.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 12.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel under stirring. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.0 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-122P/Mg(OH)2 containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (98.2 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (2.0 g) and Lopon 800 (1.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 400 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-122P/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 5 (96 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
The coating formulations of Examples 17, 18 and 19 were applied on MDF samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
18 mm thick, square shaped MDF samples (100 mm × 100 mm) were coated by the formulation of Examples 17, 18 and 19. The coatings were applied by a brush - three coats (of the same formulation) were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the samples were dried for at least a week prior to testing.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK]] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated plaques were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 8 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test. HRR curves versus time are shown in
The results indicate that in coatings which are flame retarded by brominated poly[styrene-co-butadiene], Mg(OH)2 could serve as a replacement for antimony oxide, generating antimony oxide-free coatings which show acceptable burning properties.
Water (126.7 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (83.8 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (6.3 g), BYK 093 (1.2 g) and Supragil WP (1.5 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, FR-803P (79.7 g) was added slowly to the mixture, which was maintained under stirring to form homogeneous suspension. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.9 g) was added slowly. Stirring was continued for additional 30 minutes at 500 ppm, to give 300 g of an aqueous dispersion of brominated polystyrene.
Water (114.5 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (75.9 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (8.1 g) and BYK 093 (1.2 g) and Supragil WP (1.5 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, magnesium hydroxide (33 g of FR-20-100-S10 grade from ICL-IP) was introduced to the vessel under high shear rate at 14000 rpm. (high shear disperser was T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX instrument, equipped with S 25 KV - 25F dispersing tool, from IKA).
FR-803P (65.2 g) was added slowly to the suspension, which was maintained under stirring (with the dissolver stirrer at 500 rpm) until homogeneous suspension was formed. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. Stirring continued for additional thirty minutes, to give 300 g of the formulation.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-803P containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (111.1 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and DISPERBYK 2010 (1.4 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-803P of Preparation 6 (84.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Then BYK 420 (1 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-803P/APO-containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (85.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (2.0 g) and Lopon 800 (1.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-803P/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 7 (96 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 12.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel under stirring. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-803P/Mg(OH)2 containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (98.2 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (2.0 g) and Lopon 800 (1.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-803P/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 7 (96 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
The coating formulations of Examples 21, 22 and 23 were applied om MDF wood samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
18 mm thick, square shaped MDF samples (100 mm x 100 mm) were coated by the formulation of Examples 21, 22 and 23. The coatings were applied by a brush - three coats were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the samples were dried for at least a week prior to testing.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated samples were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 9 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test.
The results indicate that the antimony oxide-free coating of Example 23, based on brominated polystyrene/Mg(OH)2, was comparable to the coating which was flame retarded by the ternary, antimony oxide containing combination consisting of brominated polystyrene/APO/Mg(OH)2 (Example 22).
Water (168.8 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (111.8 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (8.4 g), BYK 093 (1.6 g) and Supragil WP (2.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, FR-245 (106.3 g) was added slowly to the mixture, which was maintained under stirring to form homogeneous suspension. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.2 g) was added slowly. Stirring was continued for additional 30 minutes at 500 ppm, to give 400 g of an aqueous dispersion of FR-245.
Water (152.7 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by addition of propylene glycol (101.2 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (10.8 g) and BYK 093 (1.6 g) and Supragil WP (2.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA). Next, magnesium hydroxide (44 g of FR-20-100-S10 grade from ICL-IP) was introduced to the vessel under high shear rate at 14000 rpm. (high shear disperser was T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX instrument, equipped with S 25 KV - 25F dispersing tool, from IKA) .
FR-245 (86.9 g) was added slowly to the suspension, which was maintained under stirring (with the dissolver stirrer at 500 rpm) until homogeneous suspension was formed. Then BYK 420 (1.2 g) was added. Stirring continued for additional thirty minutes, to give 400 g of an aqueous dispersion of FR-245/Mg (OH)2.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-245 containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (111.1 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g) and DISPERBYK 2010 (1.4 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-245 of Preparation 8 (84.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.0 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring for 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-245/APO-containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (98.72 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (1.4 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-245 of Preparation 8 (84.4 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Next, a water-based dispersion of antimony pentoxide (APO; 12.4 g of 48% by weight aqueous dispersion of nano-sized Sb2O5; NYACOL A1550) was introduced to the vessel under stirring. Lastly, BYK 420 (1.0 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
An illustrative procedure for preparing 200 g of the FR-245/Mg(OH)2 containing acrylic coating formulation is as follows.
Alberdingk 2523 (98.2 g) was added to a mixing vessel, followed by the addition of BYK 093 (1.6 g), BYK 346 (0.6 g), DISPERBYK 2010 (2.0 g) and Lopon 800 (1.0 g) under stirring at a rate of 500 rpm (using R 1303 dissolver stirrer IKA with EUROSTAR power control-visc motor, IKA).
The rotational speed was increased to 600 rpm and the aqueous suspension of FR-245/Mg(OH)2 of Preparation 9 (96 g) was added. The mixture was maintained under stirring to form a homogeneous formulation. Lastly, BYK 420 (0.6 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for additional 30 minutes at 500 rpm.
The coating formulations of Examples 25, 26 and 27 were applied om MDF wood samples and evaluated in a cone calorimeter.
18 mm thick, square shaped MDF samples (100 mm × 100 mm) were coated by the formulation of Examples 25, 26 and 27. The coatings were applied by a brush - three coats (of the same formulation) were formed; each coat was dried at room temperature for at least four hours before the application of the next coat. Then the samples were dried for at least a week prior to testing.
Data was collected by a cone calorimeter [FTT iCone Classic Calorimeter manufactured by Fire Testing Technology, West Sussex, UK] under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 over 240 seconds. The specimens were tested without an edged frame sample holder exposing a surface area of 100 cm2. The FR treated samples were tested in the horizontal orientation 25 mm from the heat source. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent edge burning effects.
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 10 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test.
The results indicate that magnesium hydroxide can replace antimony oxide in FR-245 based coatings, to provide coatings showing comparable, and perhaps even reduced, flammability.
The goal of the study was to examine the efficiency of Mg(OH)2 as a replacement for APO in acrylic coatings which are flame retarded by a brominated compound, i.e., nonpolymeric flame retardant. The brominated compound chosen for the study was decabromodiphenyl ethane (DPDPE), a strong flame retardant with an exceptionally high (~80%) bromine content:
Aqueous suspensions of DPDPE and DPDPE/Mg(OH)2 were prepared using the procedures set out in Preparations 4 and 5. The compositions (% by weight) are set out below.
Next, coating formulations were prepared and tested in cone calorimeter (see preparation procedures described in Examples 17-19, and test protocol in Example 20).
The compositions of the coating formulations that were tested are tabulated in Table 12 below, together with the results of the cone calorimeter test.
APO and Mg(OH)2 both improve the action of DPDPE in the coating formulations, reducing HRR parameters. However, the combination of DPDPE/APO was shown to be slightly more efficient than DPDPE/Mg(OH)2.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IL2021/050972 | 8/9/2021 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63063440 | Aug 2020 | US |
