The present embodiments relate to baffles for a flameless thermal oxidizer (FTO), and a method of increasing capacity with the FTO.
Known FTOs have been used to maintain an oxidation reaction of gaseous waste stream(s) within a matrix of the FTO. However, such arrangements result in a limited flow capacity and limited reaction stability within the FTO. This is because the overcapacity reaction envelope or “reaction bubble” produced from the FTO diptube permits the incomplete oxidation reaction products to flow rapidly upward to and break or pierce through the top surface of the FTO matrix.
An example of a known FTO is shown in
In operation, the known FTO 10 receives the reactable process stream 20 in the diptube 18 whereupon the stream is exhausted from an outlet 26 of the diptube 18 into the porous matrix thereby creating a reaction bubble or reaction envelope 28.
However, the reaction bubble or reaction envelope 28 resulting from the stream will move vertically upward in the porous matrix 16 and along the diptube 18 and break or pierce the surface 24 of the matrix as turbulence shown generally at 30. This vertical movement or “short circuiting” occurs because there is no structure or method to impede or prevent such vertical movement.
What is therefore needed is an FTO that provides for a greater volume of the porous matrix 16 to be used which would result in a more stable reaction bubble or reaction envelope being created resulting in an increased capacity of the reactable process stream 20.
There is therefore provided a flameless thermal oxidizer (FTO) embodiment having at least one baffle constructed and arranged in the reactive chamber of the FTO to coact with a diptube of the FTO to radially expand the resulting reaction bubble or reaction envelope from the diptube into the porous matrix.
A flameless thermal oxidizer (FTO) apparatus is provided and includes at least one baffle constructed and arranged in a reactive chamber of the FTO apparatus to coact with a diptube of the FTO apparatus to radially expand a resulting reaction envelope outward into a porous matrix of the FTO apparatus.
A related method to radially expand the reaction bubble in the porous matrix is also provided. A method of controlling a reaction envelope or reaction bubble in a porous matrix of an FTO, includes positioning at least one baffle in the porous matrix coacting with a diptube of the FTO, and interrupting upward flow of the reaction envelope or reaction bubble with the at least one baffle for radially expanding said reaction envelope or reaction bubble in said porous matrix.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference may be had to the following description of exemplary embodiments considered in connection with the accompanying drawing Figures, of which:
Before explaining the inventive embodiments in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and arrangement of parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings, if any, since the invention is capable of other embodiments and being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
In the following description, terms such as a horizontal, upright, vertical, above, below, beneath and the like, are to be used solely for the purpose of clarity, illustrating the invention and should not be taken as words of limitation. The drawings are for the purpose of illustrating the invention and are not intended to be to scale.
In general, and in an FTO of the present embodiments beginning at
Referring to
Two other exemplary embodiments of an FTO constructed in accordance with the present invention are illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
By inhibiting the immediate vertical movement of the gases and combustion products from the reaction bubbles 128, 228328, the flow from the diptubes 120, 220, 320 is forced to move radially outwards and expand, as well as move downward. Such an expanding flow field not only avoids the “short circuiting” discussed above, but also i) causes a greater volume of the porous matrix 116, 216, 316 to be utilized, and ii) provides a more stable reaction bubble 128, 228, 328 to form at higher flow capacities within the matrix.
The justification for providing a more stable reaction bubble at higher volumes of reactable process streams being provided to the FTOs 100, 200, 300 is as follows.
Referring to the embodiment of
The local oxidation reaction occurs where the local reaction speed (the speed at which the reaction would propagate into a quiescent mixture of the same composition, pressure and temperature) matches the local flow velocities, i.e. the speed of the gas moving through the matrix. When these two speeds (the reaction speed and the gas velocity) match, the location of the combustion reaction is fixed in position and therefore, a stable reaction envelope or “reaction bubble” is formed.
Forcing the flow from the diptube outlet (e.g. 226) outwards in a radial/downward direction causes the flow to decelerate in a direction away from the diptube, and the reaction envelope or reaction bubble will form at a certain distance from the diptube. Furthermore, with an increasing flow rate the “reaction bubble” may be expected to move radially outwards until the velocity is reduced to again match the reaction speed.
The absence of a submerged baffle 203, 303 proximate an outlet of the submerged diptube 218, 318 results in the combustion gases being distributed into a flow path that minimizes the pressure drop through the porous matrix. A significant portion of the combustion gas therefore flows in the shortest path immediately up and around the diptube. This means that the gases do not all flow significantly radially/downward and accordingly, there is the propensity for the uncombusted gases to well-up around the diptube prior to the reaction bubble or reaction envelope growing to occupy a significant portion of the vessel or bed diameter. Use of the baffles 203, 303 prevents such occurrence.
The placement of a baffle above and also surrounding the discharge outlet of the diptube forces the gases to move radially outwards, also to disperse downwards to form the three-dimensional (“3-D”) curved surface without moving vertically. This allows the reaction bubble to form at greater radii prior to breakthrough at the bed surface. The effect on stability and capacity is magnified as the local flow velocity will vary inversely proportionally to the square of the radial distance from the diptube. Thus, a change in overall flow or composition at high flow rates can be accommodated by only a small movement in the reaction bubble.
In the current embodiments of
The impact on capacity was not a concern and therefore not quantified or accounted for. During CFD study examples to determine baffle placement in the reaction chamber, alternate baffle placement was considered only as related to minimizing breakthrough. Examples included a 12′ diameter FTO, with no baffle, an upper baffle (two different diameters) and a lower baffle. The upper baffle achieved the same results as with the current operating unit with respect to restricting the reaction within the matrix. The lower baffle also accomplished the same result, but provided an additional advantage of increasing the capacity on the order of 250% to 300%, ie. 6 MM Btu/hr as taught by the current embodiment to 15 MM Btu/hr.
It will be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely exemplary, and that a person skilled in the art may make variations and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. All such variations and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as provided and claimed herein. It should be understood that the embodiments described above are not only in the alternative, but can be combined.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62359270 | Jul 2016 | US |