Flange for a roll

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6182921
  • Patent Number
    6,182,921
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 22, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 6, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Flange (20) that is inserted by pressing or screwing into a core (10), such that the flange (20) can be removed manually from the core (10), by exerting a pure torque upon the flange (20).
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the attachment of a flange to a core.




More specifically the invention is related to the attachment of a flange to a core on which a roll of material is wound.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Light-sensitive strip material, e.g. photographic film or paper, a polyester printing plate, or another light-sensitive strip material, can be packaged light-tightly by winding it as a coil on a hollow supporting core, and by attaching a rigid, opaque flange to each end of the core, thus forming a light-tightly packaged roll. The diameter of the flanges is preferably larger than the diameter of the coiled material. A flexible circumferential cover may be secured to the coiled strip material and may cover the coiled strip material by a few complete coils. Preferably, the circumferential cover has a width in excess of the coiled strip material. The side ends of the circumferential cover may slope slightly upwards where they touch the flanges. In this way, a few coils of the circumferential cover shield the light-sensitive strip material from light. It is not required to secure the circumferential cover to the flanges: the package as described above is reliably light-tight. Such a package is used e.g. for recording film marketed by Agfa-Gevaert N.V.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the flanges


20


in such a package have a slightly conical hub


23


having outside ribs


24


approximately parallel to the axis


26


of the flange


20


. The flanges


20


are pressed into the hollow core


10


and remain attached to the core


10


because of a press fit, i.e. the outside diameter of the hub


23


including the ribs


24


is larger than the inside diameter of the core


10


. The ribs


24


serve two purposes: keeping the flanges


20


attached to the core


10


on the one hand, and preventing the flanges


20


from rotating with respect to the core


10


on the other hand. The latter is required because the roll is driven via the flanges


20


in some cooperating apparatuses in which the roll is placed. Usually, these cooperating apparatuses dispense light-sensitive strip material from the roll.




The attachment of the flanges to the core described above, however, presents a problem of reliability. The attachment is not reliable because the dimensional tolerances of the flanges and the core are critical. A flange may become detached from the core due to shocks during shipping, or due to relaxation of the core (the core is usually made of cardboard) or by someone lifting the roll by one of its flanges, etc. If a flange becomes detached, the light-sensitive strip material is exposed, whereby the roll is wasted.




Patent FR-A-1 236 361 discloses a coupling part that supports a roll of strip material; the coupling part will be referred to as “flange” below. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the flange


20


has in the direction of its axis


26


a number of triangular protrusions


25


that are slightly inclined at the side of the centre of the roll and steeply inclined at the side of the end of the roll. In this way, the flange


20


can be inserted into the hollow, cardboard core


10


of the roll, and, once attached, cannot be removed from the core without damaging the core. Because of the protrusions


25


, the core


10


, and thus also the roll, cannot rotate with respect to the flange


20


.




While this attachment may solve the problem concerning reliability, and while it may also allow the roll to be driven via the flanges, it still presents a problem. The flanges cannot easily be removed from the roll; removal damages the core.




Usually, such flanges are made of plastic, e.g. of polystyrene. Because of environmental considerations, it is highly desirable that the flanges can be removed easily from the roll, so that they can be re-used or recycled after the use of the roll.




In document DE-U-73 26 402, flanges are disclosed that are used during shipping of rolls of e.g. textile fabric or material for carpets. First, the fabric is wound onto a core, that is made of cardboard. Then, two identical flanges are inserted, one flange into each end of the core. Subsequently, the roll is shipped; when the roll is handled, e.g. by a forklift truck or another machine, it can now be handled by means of the flanges, so that damage to the roll is avoided; this is the purpose of the flanges. Subsequently, before the roll is put onto the equipment on which it is to be used, the flanges must be removed from the core, since the core is put directly onto the equipment.





FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


show a flange


20


as disclosed in this document;

FIG. 3



a


is a side view, partially showing a section, and

FIG. 3



b


is a top view. The flange


20


has a disc portion


21


and a hub portion


23


. The hub portion


23


contains screw thread


30


in the hub area near the disc portion


21


; the screw thread has a steep slope (which corresponds to a small angle λ in

FIG. 4

) so that a very large force is required to pull a flange out of the core in which it is inserted. The end


27


of the hub portion


23


that is away from the disc portion


21


has a sharp chamfer. The disc portion has either protruding elements


28


or holes


29


.




A flange


20


is inserted into a core


10


(not shown in

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


) as follows. First, the chamfered end


27


of the hub portion


23


of the flange is pressed into the core and then the rest of the hub portion


23


, as far as the start of the screw thread


30


. Then, the remaining portion of the hub portion


23


, i.e. the portion containing the screw thread


30


, is screwed into the core by means of a tool. The tool includes a lever, so that a high torque can be applied; the tool either has holes that fit into the protruding elements


28


of the disc portion


21


or has protruding elements that fit into the holes


29


of the disc portion


21


. The core does not contain screw thread; when screwing the flange


20


into the core, a screw thread is cut or pressed into the core that corresponds to the screw thread


30


of the flange


20


.




To remove the flange


20


from the core, the same tool is used to screw the flange out of the core.




This system presents the disadvantages that large forces have to be applied and that a special tool is required to insert a flange into the core and to remove it from the core.




OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the present invention to provide flanges for a roll, that reliably remain attached to the core during shipping, handling and use of the roll.




It is a further object of the invention to provide flanges that can easily be removed from the core—preferably without damaging the core—after use of the roll.




It is another object of the invention to provide flanges that can be used to drive the roll in a cooperating apparatus.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The above mentioned objects are realised by a method for attaching a flange having a helical protrusion to a core having a smooth inner surface. The method includes inserting the flange into the core so that the inserted flange is manually removable from the core by exerting a pure torque upon the flange.




The above mentioned objects are realised by a composition having a core and a flange. The core has an inner diameter d, a smooth inner surface, a centre, and an end. The flange has a disc portion having a first outer diameter and a hub portion for fitting in the core. The hub portion has a second outer diameter D and a helical protrusion, which has a height h. The first outer diameter of the disc portion is larger than 40 mm and smaller than 200 mm. The inner diameter d of the core, the second outer diameter D of the hub portion, and the height h of the helical protrusion are such that the flange is manually removable from the core by exerting a pure torque upon the flange A specific feature of the method is that the flange is manually removable from the core by turning the flange by at most two complete revolutions.




Another method includes inserting first and second flanges into opposite ends of the core, each flange having a helical protrusion. The first flange can be removed manually from the core in a first removal direction, by exerting a pure torque upon the first flange in a first rotation sense. The combination of the first rotation sense and the first removal direction has a first sign according to the right-handed screw convention. The second flange can be removed manually from the core in a second removal direction, by exerting a pure torque upon the second flange in a second rotation sense. The combination of the second rotation sense and the second removal direction has a second sign according to the right-handed screw convention, this second sign being opposite to the first sign.




A feature of this method is that a roll of strip material can be coiled onto the core, the strip material preferably being radiation-sensitive. Preferably, a flexible circumferential cover can be secured to the strip material which covers the strip material by a few complete coils, so that the strip material is light-tightly packaged.




A feature of the composition is that it has a force efficiency η>1, where η is the ratio of the force required to pull the flange axially out of the core, divided by the force required to press the flange axially into the core. Another feature of the composition is that the helical protrusion can be characterised by angles α and β, with angle α being smaller than angle β. Angle α is the angle between the helical protrusion and the inner surface of core at the side of the centre of the core. Angle β is the angle between the helical protrusion and the inner surface of the core at the side of the end of the core.




Further advantages and embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description and drawings hereinafter.




DEFINITIONS





FIG. 4

shows a “helix”


32


. A helix is also known as a screw line; a corkscrew has a helical shape. Defined mathematically, a helix is a curve on a cylindrical surface or on a conical surface; on a cylindrical surface, a helix satisfies the mathematical relation:








x=r


*cos (ω


t


);


y=r


*sin (ω


t


);


z=r* ωt


*tan (λ),






wherein r is the radius of the cylinder, ω is a constant, t is a parameter ≧0, and λ is the helix angle. The helix angle λ as shown in

FIG. 4

, is the angle between the helix


32


and a plane perpendicular to the axis


26


of the cylinder; for a helix, this angle


80


is constant. Special cases—not real helices—occur for λ=0°, where the helix becomes a circle, and for λ=90°, where the helix becomes a straight line parallel to the axis of the cylinder. For a helix on a conical surface, the only difference from a helix on a cylindrical surface is that the radius r is no longer constant.




Instead,








r=c+d*z,








wherein c is a positive constant and d is a constant that may be positive or negative.




A “helical protrusion” is a protrusion or a plurality of protrusions substantially arranged on a helix; to exclude the special cases mentioned above, the helix angle λ is limited to 0.1°<λ<89.9° or −89.9°<λ<−0.1°. The protrusion may be long, spanning e.g. a complete revolution of the helix around the cylinder or cone (with ωt varying from 0° to 360° ). Such a helical protrusion is in fact a screw thread or a portion of screw thread (see also FIG.


4


). The protrusion may also be short, having a length of e.g. a few mm (see also FIG.


5


). Each protrusion may have any length, from a few mm or less, to a length corresponding to several revolutions of the helix.




To determine whether a protrusion or a plurality of protrusions are arranged substantially on a helix, first a curve S and an angle σ are associated with the protrusion (s) as follows. Curve S, shown in

FIG. 5

, is the curve on which the protrusion lies; it is defined as the curve on the cylinder or cone lying half-way between the curves S


1


and S


2


where the protrusion touches the cylinder or cone on which it lies, S


1


and S


2


being curves in the longitudinal direction of the protrusion. The angle a of curve S is defined in the same way as a helix angle


80


, i.e. σ is the angle between S and a plane perpendicular to the axis


26


of the cylinder or cone on which S lies. For a helix, however, λ is constant, whereas σ may vary.




A protrusion or a plurality of protrusions are arranged substantially on a helix H with helix angle λ, if the difference between σ and λ is smaller than 10°; e.g. if λ=25°, then a may vary between 15° and 35°. Moreover, σ should be 0°<σ<90° or −90°<σ<0°.




A “pure torque” is a torque without axial pulling or pushing force, i.e. without a force-component parallel to axis


26


in

FIGS. 4 and 5

. In another embodiment, removing a flange


20


from a core


10


by means of a “pure torque” means that upon the flange


20


first a torque is exerted without axial pulling or pushing force, followed by exerting a small axial pulling or pushing force upon the flange


20


; “small” means that the force is smaller than ten times the weight of the flange


20


, preferably smaller than five times the flange weight, more preferably smaller than twice the flange weight. The cause of this small axial force may be the following. If a core


10


is oriented vertically (as shown in FIG.


7


), after the flange


20


is turned out of the core by applying a torque without an axial force, the flange


20


still has to be lifted out of the core


10


, which means that a force at least equal to the flange weight has to be applied. In still another embodiment, an operator may remove a flange


20


from a core


10


by exerting a torque and an axial force at the same time upon the flange


20


, although a “pure torque” would be sufficient. As will be explained hereinafter, in an embodiment in accordance with the invention a flange


20


can be removed from a core


10


by exerting a “pure torque” upon the flange


20


, but of course the operator who removes the flange


20


may also exert an axial pulling or pushing force, although this axial force is not required. What is important for the invention is that the flange


20


may be removed by means of a pure torque; of course the operator can exert other forces upon the flange at the same time, even although these forces are not required to remove the flange.




By removing “manually” a flange from a core, is meant that the operator can remove the flange by contacting the flange directly with a hand, without using any tools such as e.g. a screwdriver. In another embodiment, removing a flange “manually” from a core means that the torque exerted upon the flange by the operator is not higher than 30 Nm, preferably lower than 20 Nm, more preferably lower than 15 Nm, still more preferably lower than 10 Nm and most preferably lower than 8 Nm.




The “right-handed screw convention” is the following convention in mathematics (see also “Webster's Third New International Dictionary”, 1993): if linear motion is produced perpendicular to a plane by a rotation in the plane in a given rotation sense, the direction of the linear motion will be that of the usual motion along its axis of a right-handed screw with axis perpendicular to the plane and with the given rotation sense in a resisting medium. To apply this convention to a composition of a flange inserted in a core, the flange can be replaced by a right-handed screw and the core by a resisting medium in which the screw is inserted. When removing the flange from the core in a given removal direction, by exerting upon the flange a torque having a given rotation sense, the combination of the given removal direction and the given rotation sense has a positive sign according to the right-handed screw convention, if a torque with the given rotation sense, when exerted upon a right-handed screw, removes the screw from the resisting medium in the same given removal direction. If, in order to produce the same removal direction, the flange has to be replaced by a left-handed screw, then the combination of torque rotation sense and removal direction is negative according to the right-handed screw convention.




The “force efficiency η” of a composition of a core and a flange is η=F


out


/F


in


, wherein F


in


is the force required to press the flange axially into the core, and F


out


is the force required to pull the flange axially out of the core. Thus, if η>1, a larger force is required to pull the flange out of the core than to press it into the core.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention is described hereinafter by way of example with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein:





FIG. 1

shows a prior art flange having ribs;





FIG. 2

shows a prior art flange having protrusions;





FIG. 3



a


and

FIG. 3



b


show different views of a prior art flange having screw thread and a chamfered end;





FIG. 4

shows an embodiment of a flange in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 5

shows another embodiment of a flange in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 6

shows embodiments of cross sections of helical protrusions in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 7

shows a schematical representation of a roll comprising two flanges.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIGS. 1

to


3


show prior art flanges that were extensively described hereinbefore. Flange


20


in

FIG. 1

is pressed into core


10


at a first end


11


of the core. Flange


20


has a disc portion


21


and a slightly conical hub portion


23


comprising outside ribs


24


in the direction of the axis


26


of the flange. Such a flange is used in packaging recording film marketed by Agfa-Gevaert N.V.

FIG. 2

shows a flange


20


that has a hub portion


23


comprising triangular protrusions


25


in the direction of the axis of the flange; the protrusions are steeply inclined at the side of the disc portion


21


and slightly inclined at the opposite side.

FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


show a prior art flange, having screw thread


30


and a chamfered end


27


, that must be inserted into a core (not shown) by means of a special tool.





FIG. 7

shows a schematical representation of a roll


80


, standing on the floor. Strip material


60


is coiled on core


10


; a circumferential cover


61


is secured to the coiled strip material


60


as explained hereinbefore. A first flange


20


, having a disc portion


21


and a hub portion


23


, is attached to the core


10


at a first core end


11


, and a second flange


40


, having a disc portion


41


and a hub portion


43


, is attached to the core


10


at the opposite end


12


of the core. The strip material


60


is light-tightly packaged, as explained hereinbefore.




FIG.


4


and

FIG. 5

show different embodiments of a flange


20


according to the current invention.





FIG. 4

shows a flange having a disc portion


21


and a hub portion


23


. According to this embodiment, the flange is hollow: the disc


21


has an inner diameter


22


. Two helical protrusions


30


and


31


are formed on hub


23


. Each helical protrusion is long and continuous, as opposed to the short, discrete protrusions in FIG.


5


. The helical protrusions in

FIG. 4

are in fact screw thread. Helical protrusion


30


is arranged on a first helix


32


having a helix angle λ and helical protrusion


31


is arranged on a second helix


33


. Core


10


preferably has a smooth inner surface, without protrusions or recesses: no internal screw thread in the core is required.





FIG. 5

shows a non-hollow flange


20


having discrete protrusions


30


arranged on a helix


32


. In fact, the discrete protrusions may be short portions of screw thread.




Different embodiments of cross sections of helical protrusions are shown in FIG.


6


and will be discussed hereinafter.




Because of the helical protrusions shown in FIG.


4


and

FIG. 5

, the flange can be inserted into the core by pressing or screwing and can be removed from the core by exerting a pure torque around the axis


26


upon the flange, i.e. a torque without extra pulling force in the direction of the axis


26


. The helical protrusions convert the torque—i.e. the forces applied in a rotational direction—into a translational movement of the flange, in the direction of the axis


26


. In case of discrete protrusions, as shown e.g. in

FIG. 5

, each discrete protrusion is preferably slightly chamfered in the unscrewing direction, to ease rotational removal of the flange.




In this way, the flange can easily be removed without damaging the core.




On the other hand, a large axial force parallel to the axis


26


is required to pull the flange out of the core. Values of the axial removal force can be found in the Examples hereinafter. Because of the high axial removal force, the flanges reliably remain attached to the core during shipping, handling and use of the roll.





FIG. 6

shows different embodiments of a cross section of a core and a flange inserted in the core; only a portion of the helical protrusion


30


and a portion of the core


10


are shown. The cross sections are obtained by cutting the helical protrusion and the core by a meridian plane, i.e. a plane through the axis


26


of the hub


23


of the flange


20


. The angle α is the angle between the helical protrusion


30


and the core


10


at the side of the centre of the core; β is the angle between the helical protrusion


30


and the core


10


at the side of the end


11


of the core. In a preferred embodiment, angle α<β, so that the helical protrusion functions as a barb, requiring a large force to pull the flange


20


axially out of the core


10


and only a small force to press the flange into the core. In another embodiment, angle α>β, and the helix angle λ is so small that a large force is required to pull the flange


20


axially out of the core


10


. In a preferred embodiment, the force efficiency η>1, so that a larger force is required to pull the flange out of the core than to press it into the core.




As described hereinbefore and shown in

FIG. 7

, a strip material


60


may be coiled on the core


10


. In a preferred embodiment, the strip material


60


is light-sensitive. In a still more preferred embodiment, a flexible circumferential cover


61


is secured to the strip material


60


and shields the strip material


60


from light, as explained hereinbefore.




A roll


80


as shown in

FIG. 7

is manufactured as follows. The flanges


20


,


40


are inserted into the core


10


by pressing—according to another method, the flanges are screwed into the core. The strip material is coiled upon the core. The circumferential cover is secured to the strip material and is coiled upon the strip material.




In a preferred embodiment, the core


10


is hollow over its complete length, as shown in FIG.


7


. In another embodiment, the core is solid inside and has a hollow portion near its end


11


(see also

FIG. 4

) so that the hub portion


23


of flange


20


fits into the core


10


.




In a preferred embodiment, flange


20


is hollow over its complete length, as shown in FIG.


4


. In another embodiment, shown in

FIG. 5

, flange


20


is solid. In yet another embodiment, the flange is solid but has a hollow portion at the side of its disc portion


21


.




A (partly) hollow flange can be driven more easily in a cooperating apparatus, because a driven hub can be inserted into the flange. For a roll having two flanges according to the present invention, if the roll is to be driven via the flanges, it is preferred that the first flange


20


has a helical protrusion on a right-hand turning helix and the second flange


40


has a helical protrusion on a left-hand turning helix, or vice versa; i.e. if the flanges are to be removed from the core by torques exerted upon the flanges, for the first flange


20


the combination of the removal direction of the flange and the rotation sense of the torque has a positive sign according to the right-handed screw convention, while for the second flange


40


the combination has a negative sign according to the right-handed screw convention, or vice versa. Thus, when driven in the apparatus, the flanges are pushed into the core by the torque applied by the driving motor. If both flanges had identically turning helices, one of the flanges could be unscrewed by the motor torque.




In one embodiment of the present invention, hub


23


comprises helical protrusions


30


on two or more helices.

FIG. 5

shows discrete, short helical protrusions located on a single helix


32


.

FIG. 4

shows a first helical protrusion


30


on a first helix


32


, and a second helical protrusion


31


on a second helix


33


. The helical protrusions may also lie on three or more helices. If a hub contains helical protrusions on two or more helices, preferably these helices have equal or substantially equal helix angles.




In another embodiment, hub


23


comprises a combination of discrete, short helical protrusions as shown e.g. in FIG.


5


and of long helical protrusions as shown e.g. in FIG.


4


. Such a combination of helical protrusions may lie on the same helix or it may lie on two or more helices; the latter case includes e.g. a combination of a long, continuous helical protrusion on a first helix and of discrete, short helical protrusions on a second helix.




In a preferred embodiment, hub


23


comprises only long, continuous helical protrusions—in fact screw thread—on one or more helices, and hub


23


does not comprise short, discrete helical protrusions.




Preferably, the pitch of the helical protrusion (s) is large enough so that a few turns are sufficient to remove the flange from the core. The pitch is the distance, measured in a meridian plane through the axis


26


of the flange


20


, between two adjoining cross sections of helical protrusion (s); the pitch is also the distance that the flange is turned out of the core, when turning the flange by a complete revolution. If the helical protrusion is a screw thread, the pitch of the helical protrusion is equal to the pitch of the screw thread as known in the art.




In a preferred embodiment, the pitch is so large with respect to the length of the flange, that two complete revolutions or less of the flange suffice to remove it from the core. Preferably, the helix angle λ is 2°<λ<85°, more preferably 5°<λ<60°, still more preferably 5°<λ<45°. For negative λ, preferably 2°<−λ<85°, more preferably 5°<−λ<60°, still more preferably 5°<−λ<45°.




In a preferred embodiment, the flange


20


is made of an opaque polymeric material. In a more preferred embodiment, the flange is made of opaque polystyrene. The flange may also be made of metal. The core


10


may be made of an opaque polymeric material. In a preferred embodiment, the core is made of cardboard. Preferably, the core is made of a material that is more resilient than the material the helical protrusion is made of. Preferably, the helical protrusion is made from the same material as the hub portion of the flange, while the core may be made from another material.




In an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the characteristics of the composition consisting of the flange


20


and the core


10


are such that the flange


20


can be removed manually from the core


10


. The characteristics that are important to allow manual removal are the material properties of both the flange


20


and the core


10


, their dimensions and the tolerances on these dimensions. In the Examples below, values are given of the characteristics of a composition of a flange and a core in accordance with the present invention, without the intention to limit the invention thereto; the value of the torque that is required to remove the flange from the core is given as well.




For manual removability, the most important characteristics are the materials that the core


10


and the helical protrusion on the hub portion


23


of the flange


20


are made from, the internal diameter of the core


10


, the external diameter of the hub portion


23


of the flange


20


, and the geometry and especially the height of the helical protrusion on the hub portion


23


. With:




d: the inner diameter of the core;




D


max


=D+


2


*h: the maximum diameter of the hub portion of a flange including its helical protrusions;




D: the outer diameter of the hub portion of the flange;




h: the height of the helical protrusions (which is measured in a plane perpendicular to axis


26


, so that if D


max


=d, a hub portion with helical protrusions exactly fits in the core);




in an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the maximum diameter D


max


is larger than the inner core diameter d, so that the difference D


max


−d is not larger than 2 mm, preferably smaller than 1 mm, more preferably smaller than 0.7 mm and most preferably smaller than 0.5 mm, for a flange made of a polymeric material and for a cardboard core having an inner diameter d=72 mm and a thickness between 2 and 3 mm; if the core diameter d is larger or smaller than 72 mm, the above limiting values for D


max


−d should be changed proportionally, e.g. for a core diameter d=144 mm, all limiting values should be doubled (which results in limiting values from 2*2=4 mm to 2*0.5=1 mm). In the Examples below, the maximum diameter D


max


=71+2*0.7=72.4 mm, while the core diameter d=72.0 mm. If the core is less resilient, because the core thickness is increased or because the core is made of a stronger material than cardboard, the above limiting values for D


max


−d should be decreased. The above limiting values also depend upon the exact geometry of the helical protrusion, which includes the angles λ, α and β (see also

FIG. 6

for some possible geometries). Because so many characteristics of the flange and the core influence the manual removability of the flange—the material properties of both the flange and the core, their dimensions and the tolerances on these dimensions—a few experiments may be necessary in order to determine the dimensions of the flange and the core. For a cardboard core with an inner diameter d between 60 and 80 mm, a good starting value for the maximum hub diameter is D


max


=d+0.5 mm. If, for this value, the torque required to remove the flange is too large, D


max


should be decreased (or d should be increased). Care should also be taken that the force F


out


remains large enough, i.e. the force that is required to pull the flange axially out of the core. The force F


out


may change considerably because of the tolerance on the inner core diameter d, if cardboard cores are used. Usually, at most three or four experiments will be sufficient to determine the dimensions of a composition of a flange and a core according to the present invention, once the materials are chosen of which the flange and the core are made.




In an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the outer diameter of the disc portion


21


of the flange


20


is large enough so that the flange


20


can be removed from the core manually, by turning. Preferably, the maximum diameter of the flange


20


is larger than 40 mm, more preferably larger than 50 mm, still more preferably larger than 60 mm, while the maximum diameter of the flange


20


always remains smaller than 200 mm.




The embodiments disclosed hereinbefore are preferred embodiments, but the present invention is not limited to these embodiments.




The strip material (


60


) that is coiled upon the core (


10


) need not be light-sensitive; it may e.g. be sensitive to infrared radiation. Preferably, the strip material (


60


) is radiation-sensitive, such as photographic or thermographic material.




Preferably, for a roll of light-sensitive strip material, the maximum diameter of the flanges


20


is larger than the diameter of the coiled strip material


60


and the circumferential cover


61


. The maximum flange diameter may however be equal to or smaller than the diameter of the coiled strip material; in this case the circumferential cover


61


may be secured to the outside of the flanges, i.e. the side of the disc portion opposite to the side that is turned towards the hub portion.




A hub having a conical or cylindrical shape is preferred, but the hub may also have another shape, e.g. a slightly hyperbolical shape, provided it may be inserted into the core by pressing or screwing and it may be removed from the core by exertion of a pure torque.




Preferably, the flange


20


is pressed into the core


10


, but it may also be screwed into the core, by exerting a torque on the flange


20


instead of a pushing force.




In a preferred embodiment, the flange


20


is directly attached to the core. In another embodiment, the flange


20


is attached to the core via another part, e.g. via a ring that is secured to the core at the core end.




In a preferred embodiment, the flange


20


comprises a disc portion


21


and a hub portion


23


having a helical protrusion


30


. In another embodiment, the flange


20


comprises a hub portion


23


having a helical protrusion


30


, and e.g. a rim. The rim secures a disc, or another part, to the core


10


.




Preferably, two flanges in accordance with the present invention are attached to the core. In another embodiment, a flange according to the present invention may be attached to the first end


11


of the core, and a flange according to prior art may be attached to the second end


12


of the core. In yet another embodiment, one flange may be is attached to the first end


11


of the core, and no flange is attached to the second end


12


of the core.




In a preferred embodiment, the two flanges that are attached to the core are in accordance with the present invention, and have the same features, with a preferred exception for the helix angle λ: as explained hereinbefore, preferably the first flange has a right-hand turning helix and the second flange a left-hand turning helix, or vice versa. In another embodiment, the two flanges have different features: the first flange has screw thread and the second flange has short, discrete protrusions; in yet another embodiment, the first flange has a helix angle λ=25° and the second flange has a helix angle λ=40°; etc.




Preferably, all helical protrusions on a hub have cross sections having the same features, in particular the same angles a and β. However, the helical protrusions may have cross sections with differing features.




A flange according to the present invention provides important advantages.




Existing rolls and cores may be used, only the flanges are modified.




Manufacturing the flanges is easy. The core does not have to comprise protrusions: a simple, inexpensive tube, e.g. made of cardboard, is sufficient. In a preferred embodiment σ>1, whereby the flanges remain so reliably attached to the core, that the dimensional tolerances on the core may be larger, which means a cheaper core may be used.




A light-sensitive strip material on a core with flanges according to the current invention can be packaged light-tightly, and the packaging process can easily be automated.




The flanges remain reliably attached to the core during shipping, handling and use of the roll.




The flanges can be used to drive the roll in a cooperating apparatus.




The flanges can easily be removed, which is an environmental advantage.




The flanges can be removed manually. No tool is required to remove the flanges. This is convenient for the user.




Removal of the flanges is fast.




EXAMPLES




We measured F


in


, i.e. the force required to press the flange axially into the core, and F


out


, i.e. the force required to pull the flange axially out of the core, for prior art flanges A and B having ribs (see

FIG. 1

) and for a flange according to the present invention, having the features described below.




The results of these measurements are found in the following table:




















F


in


[N]




F


out


[N]




η = F


out


/F


in































prior art flange (A)




600




300




0.5







prior art flange (B)




200




100




0.5







flange acc. invention




200




250




1.25















Forces were measured for two prior flanges, (A) and (B). Although these flanges have the same nominal dimensions, the forces are different because of the dimensional tolerances of the flanges and the core.




For a flange according to the present invention, η may be larger than 1 thanks to a good choice of the specific features of the flange, especially the dimension and the angles λ, α and β of the helical protrusion.




The flange according to the present invention, used for the measurement, was part of a roll; the roll and the flange have the following features:




roll: weight=1 kg per 100 mm roll length coiled strip material:




diameter=124 mm




contains 60 m of HeNe recording film,




having a thickness of 110 μm




core: material: cardboard




inner diameter=72.0 mm




thickness=2.5 mm




flange: material: ABS, i.e. acrylonitrile butadiene styrene




disc portion:




diameter=130 mm




thickness=3 mm




hub portion:




cylindrical




diameter=71 mm




length=47 mm




helical protrusion: (material: the same material as the flange)




continuous (=screw thread)




protrusion height=0.7 mm




λ=7°40′




α≡30°




β=90°




To remove the flange from the core, a torque of 7 Nm was exerted upon the flange.




Having described in detail preferred embodiments of the current invention, it will now be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appending claims.




parts list






10


core






11


,


12


core end






20


,


40


flange






21


,


41


disc portion






22


inner diameter of disc portion






23


,


43


hub portion






24


rib






25


protrusion






26


axis






27


hub end






28


protruding element






29


hole






30


,


31


helical protrusion






32


,


33


helix






60


strip material






61


circumferential cover






80


roll



Claims
  • 1. A composition spool comprising:a core having an inner diameter d, a smooth inner surface, a center and an end, said core being made of cardboard; and a flange comprised of polymeric material, said flange having: a disc portion having a first outer diameter; and a hub portion for fitting axially within the core, the hub portion having a second outer diameter D and a helical protrusion, the helical protrusion having a height h; wherein the first outer diameter of the disc portion is larger than 40 mm and smaller than 200 mm and the dimensions in millimeters of the inner diameter d of the core, the second outer diameter D of the hub portion and the height h of the helical protrusion are such that the value of Dmax-d≦d/72 (2.0 mm), where Dmax is the maximum permissible value of D.
  • 2. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the value of Dmax-d≦d/72 (1.0 mm).
  • 3. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the value of Dmax-d≦d/72 (0.7 mm).
  • 4. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the value of Dmax-d≦d/72 (0.5 mm).
  • 5. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the flange is manually removable from the core by exerting upon the flange a pure torque of no more than 30 Nm.
  • 6. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the flange is removable from the core by rotating the flange by at most two complete revolutions.
  • 7. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein the spool has a force efficiency η>1, η being the ratio of the force required to pull the flange axially out of the core, divided by the force required to press the flange axially into the core.
  • 8. The composition spool of claim 1, wherein an angle α, between the helical protrusion and the inner surface of core at the side of the center of the core, is smaller than an angle β, between the helical proutusion and the inner surface of the core at the side of the end of the core.
  • 9. The composition spool of claim 1, further comprising a strip of radiation-sensitive material wound on said core.
  • 10. The composition spool of claim 9, further comprising a flexible circumferential cover covering the strip material.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
97204077 Dec 1997 EP
Parent Case Info

The application claims the benefit of the U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/072,703 filed Jan. 27, 1998, now expired.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
1901737 Dunlap Mar 1933
1994118 Swanson Mar 1935
1999765 Laveau Apr 1935
2314749 Willner Mar 1943
2988283 Garfield Jun 1961
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
464623 Dec 1968 CH
1837013 Aug 1961 DE
7326402 Feb 1974 DE
0594928 May 1994 EP
9500418 Jan 1995 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/072703 Jan 1998 US