Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates generally to vascular grafts, particularly to vascular grafts for end-to-side anastomosis for purposes of bypassing an occluded or diseased section of a blood vessel. More particularly, the present invention is a polytetrafluoroethylene graft having an integral terminal polytetrafluoroethylene flanged cuff section which permits an end-to-side anastomosis with a blood vessel in which the terminal polytetrafluoroethylene flanged cuff section is sutured to the blood vessel and provides a polytetrafluoroethylene-tissue interface between the graft and the blood vessel. The present invention also provides a method and apparatus for forming the flanged polytetrafluoroethylene cuffed section from a tubular polytetrafluoroethylene graft.
The use of cuff grafts for bypassing peripheral vascular occlusive conditions, particularly femoro-crural patch prostheses, is well known in the art. To date, however, either autologous grafts or synthetic grafts with a terminal cuff fashioned from venous tissue at the anastomotic site have been used. Examples of conventional cuffed grafts are the Miller collar described in Miller, J. H., The Use of the Vein Cuff and PTFE, V
The present invention offers a new type of anastomosis for femoro-crural bypass in which the graft is fabricated in a flared, double-bulb configuration. The inventive graft configuration offers an optimal geometry for the anastomosis as a function of hemodynamic properties. By optimizing blood flow from the bypass prosthesis to the artery, formation of intimal hyperplasia may be reduced with a concomitant increase in graft patency and decreased morbidity.
The present invention also provides an apparatus and method for forming an integral polytetrafluoroethylene distal flange or cuff on an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft. The apparatus consists of an annular mold having a radially extending annular slot forming an expansion port. The inventive flanged cuff graft is made by first forming an unsintered tubular PTFE vascular graft by extruding a PTFE-lubricant mixture into a billet to form a tubular extrudate, placing the extrudate in the annular mold, and forming an annular cuff by either: 1) application of a negative pressure to the expansion port; or 2) application of positive pressure, as by a highly compliant angioplasty balloon, through the tubular extrudate lumen, to radially displace a section of the tubular extrudate, thereby forming a cuffed graft.
Various different approaches have been taken to fabricate branched grafts. As early as 1938, Bowen, U.S. Pat. No. 2,127,903, discloses a bio-absorbable surgically implantable graft made of animal tissue and a binder formed by wrapping strips of the treated animal tissue about a structural form. U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,979, issued Mar. 20, 1990 to Possis, discloses a method of shaping a human umbilical cord for use as a vascular graft. The method employs a mandrel to support and shape the umbilical cord during forming and curing of the cord. The forming and curing process provides a cord with a blood flow restrictor section. PTFE coatings are provide on the mandrel to facilitate mounting the umbilical cord onto the mandrel. A shaping section of the mandrel is provided with a plurality of vacuum openings in the mandrel.
The umbilical cord is treated with ethanol and a vacuum applied until the cord is dehydrated. The cord is then exposed to a curative and fixative solution and a vacuum applied until the umbilical cord is cured substantially airtight and circumferentially compressed and compacted around the mandrel forming section. U.S. Pat. No. 4,354,495, issued Oct. 19, 1982 to Bodicky, discloses a method of connecting a PTFE tube to a hub made of a moldable plastic, e.g., polyurethane, acrylics, polyethylene, polycarbonates, etc. The method involves selectively heating a portion of the PTFE tube to form a bulge or protrusion, then inserting the bulge into a mold and molding the moldable plastic hub about the bulge in the mold. Kaneko et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,957,508, issued Sep. 18, 1990), disclose an elastomeric medical tube having proximal and distal ends, outwardly flared. The outward flare of the ends is achieved by forming the inner and outer surfaces of the tube to exhibit inverse elastomeric properties, i.e., the inner surface exhibits a dilating force, while the outer surface exhibits a shrinking force. The tube is made of high molecular weight polymers, particularly, polyvinyl halide, polystyrene, polyolefin series polymers, polyester series condensates, cellulose series high polymers, polyurethane series high polymers, polysulfone series resins, polyamides, etc. along with copolymers or mixtures of these.
Noshiki et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,236, issued Feb. 7, 1995), disclose a vascular prosthesis and method of making a vascular prosthesis by providing a vascular prosthesis substrate made of PTFE or other microporous material, and depositing and capturing within the wall of the prosthesis substrate fragments of biological tissue. The biological tissue fragments may be vascular tissues, connective tissues, fat tissues and muscular tissues and/or vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblast cells. The impregnation process is conducted by depositing the cellular material on the inner wall of the graft and applying a pressure differential between the luminal and abluminal wall surfaces to drive the tissue fragments into the microporous matrix of the vascular prosthesis. Berry et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,883,453, issued Nov. 28, 1989), disclose an aorto-coronary bypass graft and a method of making the graft. The graft consists of a plate portion and at least one tube portion extending from the plate portion. The graft and plate are disclosed as being made of an electrostatically spun fibrous structure. The graft is adhered to the plate by mounting the graft onto a mandrel, applying adhesive to the surface of the plate surrounding an opening in the plate, passing the mandrel through an opening in the plate until the graft contacts the adhesive. The adhesive is any suitable adhesive for the materials forming the plate and the graft. According to the preferred embodiment described in this reference, the graft preferably has a tapered wall thickness, such that the graft wall thickness adjacent the plate is greater than that distant the plate.
Hayashi et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,526, issued May 5, 1992), disclose a process for producing molded PTFE articles. According to this process, unsintered PTFE extrudates are inserted into a sintering mold. The sintering mold has a diameter slightly larger than the outside diameter of the unsintered PTFE extrudate. Clearance between the outside diameter of the unsintered PTFE extrudate and the inside surface of the sintering mold is on the order of 2% of the diameter of the sintering mold. The extrudate is drawn into the sintering mold via a plug, inserted into the terminal lumen of the extrudate and a wire and take-up reel. The PTFE extrudate is cut to match the length of the sintering mold, and the sintering mold is sealed on the cut extrudate end. The assembly is transferred to a sintering oven, and sintered. During sintering, the extrudate expands in contact with the sintering mold and conforms to the shape of the sintering mold. After cooling, the sintered extrudate contracts away from the sintering mold and assumes an even shape corresponding to the sintering mold.
Ely, Jr., et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 3,196,194, issued Jul. 20, 1965), disclose an extrusion process for making FEP-fluorocarbon tubing. The extrusion process consists of screw extruding fluid FEP copolymer through a barrel extruder to form a tubular extrudate, placing the tubular extrudate into a heater, pressurizing the tubular extrudate to radially expand the FEP extrudate, and cooling the expanded extrudate to yield a heat shrinkable tube with memory function to the reduced diameter extrudate. U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,568, issued Mar. 12, 1985 to Madras, discloses an arterial bypass prosthesis for end-to-side anastomosis and reduction of anastomotic hyperplasia. The arterial bypass prosthesis consists generally of a connector element including a tubular entrance member, a tubular exit member and a heel member. The tubular entrance receives and provides an entrance passage for blood flow. The tubular exit member is coupled to and angularly offset from the tubular entrance and provides a passage for the blood from the entrance member. The heel member extends substantially coaxially from the exit member. The distal end of the heel member is inserted through the open arteriotomy and into the portion of the vessel upstream of the arteriotomy. The heel may be solid or may include a passage continuous with the entrance and exist members. A throat portion is located intermediate the tubular entrance and exit members and a circumferential skirt substantially surrounds the throat portion. The skirt heals into the advential tissue of the blood vessel.
With particular reference to the known method for shaping PTFE materials, the following are cited as examples of the state and scope of the art. U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,516, issued Nov. 13, 1984 discloses a process for producing high strength expanded PTFE products having a coarse microstructure. This is the Bowman, et al. patent, which discloses expansion rates up to 400%/sec. The resulting PTFE microstructure is then defined by a “coarseness” index which purports to consider node size, i.e., height and width and fibril length. Tu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,110, issued Dec. 27, 1994), disclose a method of making vascular grafts by collagen cross-linking conducted under the influence of alternating pressure across the graft wall. The alternating pressure aids in cross-linking the collagen fibers.
Campbell, et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,743,480, issued May 10, 1988), disclose a method for extruding and expanding tubular PTFE products in which a helical groove is machined into the extrusion barrel and/or the mandrel. Extrusion of a tubular PTFE product results in an extrudate having nodes angularly displaced between about 85-15 degrees from the longitudinal axis of the extrudate. Finally, Okita (U.S. Pat. No. 4,234,535, issued Nov. 18, 1980), discloses a process for forming expanded PTFE vascular grafts having fibers of smaller diameter at the inner surface of the tubing and fibers of at least two times diameter at the outer diameter of the tubing. The grafts are produced by a process in which PTFE tubular extrudates are formed, then onto drive and take-up capstans. The capstan drive system conveys the extrudate through a heater set at a temperature above 327° C., then into a vacuum case which causes radial expansion of the extrudate at a temperature above 327° C., then, after radial expansion, the vacuum case is cooled, by introduction of cooled air, to a temperature below sintering temperature thereby fixing the tube at the expanded diameter and in the longitudinal direction by tension from the drive and take-up capstans. This patent also discloses and claims the use of cooling air conveyed through the tube lumen during the radial expansion process. By conveying cooled air through the tube lumen, the temperature at the luminal surface is maintained below the PTFE sintering temperature. In this manner, differing fibril diameters at the luminal and abluminal surfaces are formed.
In current clinical practice, a peripheral anastomosis between a bypass prosthesis and a peripheral artery has been performed by either direct anastomosis, interposition of a venous segment at the anastomotic site, anastomosing the prosthesis with a long venous patch sutured into the artery (Linton Patch), enlargement of the prosthesis within the anastomotic region using a venous patch (Taylor Patch) or interposition of a venous cylinder between the prosthesis and the artery (Miller Collar). In femoro-distal bypass grafting, there is growing evidence that compliance mismatch between the graft and the recipient artery and hemodynamic factors are a major cause of thrombosis and the development of subintimal hyperplasia at the anastomotic site.
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide a new bypass graft for femoro-distal bypass grafting made of microporous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE).
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a femoro-distal bypass graft made of ePTFE having a distal flange suitable for femoro-crural bypass grafting.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a femoro-distal bypass graft made of ePTFE having a distal flange suitable for arterio-venous patch (AVP) grafting.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method for making the new bypass graft for femoro-distal bypass grafting.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method for making the new bypass graft for femoro-distal bypass grafting utilizing a tubular mold having an circumferential recess extending radially from the central axis of the tubular mold to form a distal flange on an tubular polytetrafluoroethylene graft.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent to those skilled in the art from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiments of invention taken with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are identically numbered. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected preferred embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The detailed description illustrates by way of example, not by way of limitation, the principles of the invention. This description will clearly enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives and uses of the invention, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the invention.
Graft patency for standard end-to-side ePTFE graft/arterial anastomoses has been reported between 21 and 60% for one year patency and between 14 and 38% for three year patency. One year patency using the Miller collar has been reported at 47% for ePTFE crural grafts, with three year patency being 52%. One year patency using the Taylor patch has been reported at 86%, with three year patency being reported at 61%. Chester, J. F., et al, “Interposition vein patches for vascular reconstruction,” Hospital Update, February 1993. Direct PTFE to artery anastomosis has been criticized because of mechanical distortion of the artery by the relatively rigid PTFE and formation of intimal hyperplasia between the PTFE and the recipient artery. These two factors have been implicated in the high occlusion rates and low graft patency characteristic of direct PTFE to artery anastomoses, Jamieson, C. W., et al, ed. Vascular Surgery, 5th Ed., pp. 330-340 (1994).
The preferred embodiments of the inventive flanged graft are illustrated in
The bifurcated flanges 12 and 14 may be symmetrical or asymmetrical relative to one another. The selection of symmetrical or asymmetrical bifurcated flanges 12, 14 is preferably determined by the vascular surgeon based upon the identity of the receiving artery 2, position of the arteriotomy on the receiving artery 2 and luminal diameter of the graft 11. The graft 11 is preferably anastomosed to the receiving artery 2 using continuous sutures 22 to join the arteriotomy to the peripheral edges 18, 20 of the bifurcated flanges 12, 14, the heel region 17 and the crotch angle 16.
A second graft has substantially symmetrical bifurcated flanges 34, 36, with the crotch angle 37 being substantially co-incident with the median line 31 of the graft 11. Both of flanges 34 and 36 extend substantially identical lengths laterally and in opposite directions relative to the graft 11 and the arcuate peripheral edges of the flanges 34, 36 extend circumferentially about the receiving artery 2 to a substantially equivalent extent. The second graft with symmetrical bifurcated flanges 34, 36 is particularly useful where the angular orientation of the end-to-side anastomosis between the graft 11 and the receiving artery 2 is substantially perpendicular.
The third graft, denoted by asymmetrical bifurcated flanges 38, 32, is substantially a mirror image of the first graft, denoted by asymmetrical bifurcated flanges 30, 40. In this third graft, the flange 32 projects laterally from and extends circumferentially about the graft 11 a greater extent than flange 38. The crotch angle 33 of the third graft is offset toward the shorter flange 38 relative to the median line 31 of the graft 11. The configuration of the third graft, having flanges 38, 32 is well suited to end-to-side anastomoses where the angular orientation between the graft 11 and the receiving artery 2 is acute on the side of the shorter flange 38 and obtuse on the side of the longer flange 32.
In each of the three preferred embodiments of the inventive bifurcated flange bypass graft 10, the bifurcated flanges are preferably made of ePTFE and formed as a continuous, integral, monolithic section of the ePTFE tubular graft 11, without intervening seams or overlap regions. The bifurcated flanges may be formed by any of a variety of methods of forming ePTFE, including molding a section of an ePTFE tube, selective expansion of sections of an ePTFE tube, cutting or trimming sections of an ePTFE tube, such as manual cutting or laser cutting or by using the inventive method described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,590, which is hereby incorporated by reference for purposes of illustrating one of many methods of making the inventive graft.
From the foregoing, those skilled in the art will understand that the use of asymmetrical bifurcated flanges on the inventive flanged graft 10 is particularly well suited to end-to-side anastomoses where the longitudinal axis of the inflow graft is positioned at an acute angle relative to the receiving artery 2, with the longer flange 12 being distally-oriented and the shorter flange 14 being proximally oriented relative to the direction of blood flow.
Dimensionally, it is preferable to fabricate each bifurcated flange to a length which is between 1 to 5 times the luminal diameter of the graft. Thus, for a 5 mm graft, the shorter flange should be no less than 5 mm in length measured from the outer surface of the graft to the furthest point on the toe region of the flange, and the longer flange should be no greater than 25 mm, measured from the outer surface of the graft to the furthest point on the toe region of the flange. Circumferentially, each bifurcated flange should extend no greater than 1 times the lumen diameter of the graft about the receiving artery. Thus, where a graft has a luminal diameter of 5 mm, the bifurcated flange should extend no further than 5 mm measured from the median line of the graft to a point on the arcuate peripheral edge of the flange which is circumferentially furthest from the median line of the graft. These dimensional constraints have been found to represent optimal parameters for an ePTFE femoro-infragenicular bypass graft which does not use a venous patch or collar at the ePTFE-arterial junction. The configuration of bifurcated flanged graft 10 has been found to have an optimal geometry and a reduced probability of developing subintimal hyperplasia as a cause of graft failure. The inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10 has shown minimal presence of zones of low flow velocity or vortex formation at the anastomotic site and exhibits an optimal hemodynamic flow pattern for an end-to-side anastomosis.
Conventional end-to-side anastomoses exhibit complex hemodynamic flow patterns at the anastomotic junction. Zones of low flow velocity, reversed flow velocity and vortex formation are found in virtually all types of known end-to-side anastomoses. Clearly, detailed hemodynamic measurements are difficult to obtain in vivo. A pulsatile flow model was developed to simulate hemodynamic conditions within the distal end-to-side anastomosis of the inventive femoro-infragenicular bypass graft. A closed flow loop system was made by connecting two reservoirs maintained at systolic and diastolic pressure. A magnetic valve was used to generate a pulsatile flow representative of that in the femoral arteries. A blood-analog fluid (7.5% Dextran by weight in distilled water) was used. To enhance sonographic visualization, the blood-analog fluid was seeded (1 g/L) with 40-120μ SEPHADEX particles (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Flow visualization and velocity field measurements were accomplished by direct dye injection and Doppler color flowometry using real-time ultrasonography (Acuson 128 XP/10) with a 5 MHZ linear array transducer having a Doppler frequency of 3.5 MHZ and an aperture size of 3.8 cm. Doppler color flowometry images were continuously recorded using an S-VHS video camera and an S-VHS high resolution video cassette recorder. Images were obtained at specific intervals within the pulsatile cycle using a peak capture techniques which map peak velocities at each pixel in the frame during successive one second intervals. Flow velocity measurements were detected using ultrasound beams transmitted at an angle of 70° to the face of the transducer in an upstream or downstream direction.
The inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10 was tested against the Linton patch and the Taylor patch using the dye injection and Doppler color flowometry flow visualization techniques under both low and high pulsatile flow rates. In both the Linton patch and the Taylor patch, the velocity profile was skewed toward the outer wall of each graft, independent of flow rates. An impingement of the flow stream on the outer wall produced circumferential flow motions in the high flow situation, while under low flow conditions, a region of flow stagnation was identified at the host vessel outer wall and in line with the inner wall of the graft. This point marked a flow split zone where one flow stream moved in the distal branch and one flow stream moved in the proximal branch of the recipient artery. In the inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10, the area of flow splitting was virtually eliminated. Flow vortexing was observed in the toe and heel regions of the Taylor patch and Linton patch. Minimal vortex formation was observed at the anastomotic site of the inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10. The flow profile through the inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10 is depicted in
Under Doppler color flowometry, both the Linton patch and the Taylor patch produced the following hemodynamic profiles: 1) flow splitting into reversed vortex flow in the upstream and forward flow in the downstream direction, 2) flow jetting and a non-homogeneous flow pattern downstream of the anastomotic site, and 3) low flow regions with zero flow or reverse flow. The primary location for each of these hemodynamic phenomenon were opposite to the graft inlet and along the inner wall of the artery from the toe of the anastomosis to downstream. Variation of flow patterns with deceleration of flow waveform from systole to diastole resulted in and increase of low flow regions in both the Linton patch and the Taylor patch. None of these hemodynamic phenomena were observed with any degree of statistical significance with the inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10, which exhibited a substantially laminar flow pattern illustrated in
In a clinical study, 65 infragenicular bypass grafts using the inventive bifurcated flanged graft 10 were performed on 62 patients. In 18 of the patients a temporary extracorporeal bypass was inserted between the proximal and distal anastomotic sites for measurement of blood flow and pressure to calculate the peripheral arterial resistance in each of the upstream and downstream directions. Patency of the inventive grafts was tracked. Prior to the bypass operation, all patients underwent Doppler ultrasonographic ankle artery pressure measurements and arteriography. Graft patency was tracked by clinical examination and Doppler ultrasonographic arterial pressure studies on all patients at three month intervals. The morphology of the anastomosis was examined postoperatively by angiography and at each three month interval with Doppler color flowometry. The one year primary patency rate was 60% which remained constant over the second year of follow up. The one year secondary patency rate was 68% while the second year patency rate fell only to 60%.
Turning now to
Flared skirt 56 has a toe section 67 which projects outwardly from the ePTFE tubular member 52 at toe angle 62. The length of toe section 67 may be predetermined during manufacture, or may be trimmed by a vascular surgeon during the implant procedure to accommodate the open arteriotomy at the anastomotic site. A heel section 69 projects outwardly from the ePTFE tubular member 52 at heel angle 60, and in an opposing direction from the toe section 67. A curved outer peripheral edge 58 of the flared skirt 56 subtends a 180° arc and forms a continuous surface interconnecting toe section 67 and heel section 69. Depending upon the desired length of toe section 67, the length of curved outer peripheral edge 58 and the extension distance 71 which the flared skirt 56 projects in the distal direction relative to the ePTFE tubular member 52 will vary. Phantom lines 64, 66 depict alternative curved outer peripheral edges 64, 66 of the flared skirt 56, each having a common beginning point 54 at heel section 69.
The flared skirt 56 is preferably made of ePTFE and is formed as a continuous, integral, monolithic part of the ePTFE tubular graft member 52, without any intervening seam or overlap. The flared skirt 56 may be formed by any of a variety of methods of forming ePTFE, including molding a section of an ePTFE tube, selective expansion of sections of an ePTFE tube, cutting or trimming sections of an ePTFE tube, such as manual cutting or laser cutting or by using the inventive method described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,590, which is hereby incorporated by reference for purposes of illustrating one of many methods of making the inventive graft.
As illustrated in
In accordance with the preferred embodiments of the AVP prosthesis 50, the toe region 67 will have a length greater than that of the heel region 69, with the toe region 67 projecting outwardly from the central longitudinal axis 53 of the tubular ePTFE graft member 52 in the direction of the blood flow. As noted above, the length of toe region 67 is variable, preferably within the range of 5 to 25 mm measured from an outer wall surface of the ePTFE tubular graft member 52 adjacent the toe region 67, to a furthest point on the outer peripheral edge 58 of the toe region 67. It has been found preferable, however, to maintain the length of heel region 69 to a fixed length of approximately 3 mm, measured from the outer wall surface of the ePTFE tubular graft member 52 adjacent the heel region 69, for femoro-distal bypass anastomoses.
While the present invention has been disclosed and described with reference to its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that modifications in material selection, dimension, and construction may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention, which is limited only by the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of the earlier filing date of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/842,582, filed 10 May 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,553,316, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/898,793, filed 3 Jul. 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,746,480, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/125,907, filed 8 Dec. 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,273,912, which is a national stage entry of Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US96/02714, filed 28 Feb. 1996, and all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/125,910, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,590, which is a national stage entry of Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US96/02715, which was filed 28 Feb. 1996, and both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2127903 | Bowen | Aug 1938 | A |
3196194 | Ely, Jr. et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3492994 | Field | Feb 1970 | A |
3683926 | Suzuki | Aug 1972 | A |
3713441 | Thomas | Jan 1973 | A |
3805301 | Liebig | Apr 1974 | A |
3815608 | Spinosa et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3816919 | Portnoy | Jun 1974 | A |
3818511 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3825257 | Palmer | Jul 1974 | A |
3826257 | Buselmeier | Jul 1974 | A |
3853462 | Smith | Dec 1974 | A |
3882862 | Berend | May 1975 | A |
3945052 | Liebig | Mar 1976 | A |
3986828 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4047252 | Liebig et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4098571 | Miyata et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4192312 | Wilson | Mar 1980 | A |
4234535 | Okita | Nov 1980 | A |
4279259 | Lee et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4309776 | Berguer | Jan 1982 | A |
4313231 | Koyamada | Feb 1982 | A |
4321914 | Begovac et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4345414 | Bornat et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4354495 | Bodicky | Oct 1982 | A |
4366819 | Kaster | Jan 1983 | A |
4387516 | Laux | Jun 1983 | A |
4416028 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4441215 | Kaster | Apr 1984 | A |
4482516 | Bowman et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4501263 | Harbuck | Feb 1985 | A |
4503568 | Madras | Mar 1985 | A |
4517687 | Liebig et al. | May 1985 | A |
4530113 | Matterson | Jul 1985 | A |
4561129 | Arpesella | Dec 1985 | A |
4601718 | Possis et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4630375 | Spolyar | Dec 1986 | A |
4712551 | Rayhanabad | Dec 1987 | A |
4714421 | D'Agostino | Dec 1987 | A |
4728328 | Hughes et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743480 | Campbell et al. | May 1988 | A |
4807622 | Ohkaka et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816028 | Kapadia et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4840940 | Sottiurai | Jun 1989 | A |
4872455 | Pinchuk et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4883453 | Berry et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4909979 | Possis et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4935190 | Tennerstedt | Jun 1990 | A |
4944737 | Bloom | Jul 1990 | A |
4957508 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4957669 | Primm | Sep 1990 | A |
5042161 | Hodge | Aug 1991 | A |
5078735 | Mobin-Uddin | Jan 1992 | A |
5100422 | Berguer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110526 | Hayashi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5156619 | Ehrenfeld | Oct 1992 | A |
5304340 | Downey | Apr 1994 | A |
D348618 | Leslie et al. | Jul 1994 | S |
5376110 | Tu et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387236 | Noishiki et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399352 | Hanson | Mar 1995 | A |
5443497 | Venbrux | Aug 1995 | A |
5456712 | Maginot | Oct 1995 | A |
5456714 | Owen | Oct 1995 | A |
5472404 | Volgushev | Dec 1995 | A |
5476506 | Lunn | Dec 1995 | A |
5496341 | Sauer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5575817 | Martin | Nov 1996 | A |
5591203 | Fahy | Jan 1997 | A |
5653743 | Martin | Aug 1997 | A |
5683449 | Marcade | Nov 1997 | A |
5695504 | Gifford, III et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713859 | Finch, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723005 | Herrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5752934 | Campbell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755779 | Horiguchi | May 1998 | A |
5755780 | Finch, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814005 | Barra et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824010 | McDonald | Oct 1998 | A |
5827327 | McHaney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843158 | Lenker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843165 | Plaia et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849036 | Zarate | Dec 1998 | A |
5861026 | Harris et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5893886 | Zegdi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902317 | Kleshinski et al. | May 1999 | A |
5950320 | Dorsey | Sep 1999 | A |
5976159 | Bolduc et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989287 | Yang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6019788 | Butteres et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039754 | Caro | Mar 2000 | A |
6048362 | Berg | Apr 2000 | A |
6056717 | Finch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086553 | Akbik | Jul 2000 | A |
6102884 | Squitieri | Aug 2000 | A |
6136022 | Nunez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187033 | Schmitt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190590 | Randall et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193746 | Strecker | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203735 | Edwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210430 | Solem | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221101 | Harris et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273912 | Scholz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6371981 | Yang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6436135 | Goldfarb | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458155 | Van Nguyen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6554856 | Doorly et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6582409 | Squitieri | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585762 | Stanish | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589278 | Harris et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613087 | Healy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626865 | Prisell | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6746480 | Scholz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767358 | Leonhardt et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6821295 | Farrar | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6857196 | Dalrymple | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858035 | Whayne | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7553316 | Scholz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020193872 | Trout et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014108 | Lauren | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051362 | Buckman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030182815 | Carlson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040039453 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064181 | Harris et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040210302 | Scholz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050055079 | Duran | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050272806 | Falotico et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030935 | Scholz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060210816 | Finley | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005128 | Scholz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070255400 | Parravicini et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100280598 | Fox | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 269 254 | Oct 1987 | EP |
63158052 | Jul 1988 | JP |
9509585 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO-9514442 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9534255 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9600103 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9731591 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9852495 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9852495 | Nov 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jun. 2, 2009 Office Action in Japanese application 2006-303732. |
Fillinger et al., “Beneficial Effects of Banding on Venous Intimal-Medial Hyperplasia in Arteriovenous Loop Grafts”, The American Journal of Surgery, Aug. 1989, pp. 87-94, vol. 158. |
Wells et al., “Effect of Carotid Artery Geometry on the Magnitude and distribution of Wall Shear Stress Gradients”, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Apr. 1996, pp. 667-678, vol. 23, No. 4. |
Crawshaw et al., “Flow Distribution ast the Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis”, Arch Surg, Nov. 1980, pp. 1280-1284, vol. 115. |
Fillinger et al., “Grat Geometry and Venous Intimal-Medial Hyperplasia in Arteriovenous Loop Grafts”, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Apr. 1990, pp. 556-566, vol. 11, No. 4. |
Dobrin et al., “Mechanical Factors Predisposing to Intimal Hyperplasia and Medial Thickening in Autogenous Vein Grafts”, Surgery, Mar. 1989, pp. 393-400, vol. 105, No. 3. |
Justin H. Miller et al., “The Use of the Vein Cuff and PTFE”, Vascular Surgical Techniques an Atlas, Second Edition, pp. 276-286. |
R.S. Taylor et al., “Improved Technique for Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results Using Anastomotic Vein Patches”, The British Journal of Surgery, 1992, pp. 348-354, vol. 79. |
J.F. Chester et al., “Interposition Vein Patches for Vascular Reconstruction”, pp. 1-3. |
John H.N. Wolfe, “Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Femorodistal Bypass”, Rob & Smith's Operative Surgery/Vascular Surgery Fifth Edition, pp. 330-340. |
Advertisement for FEP-Ringed GORE-TEX Vascular Graft, 1 page, prior to Jun. 21, 1989. |
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Venaflo Vascular Grafts Information for Use, Rev. 2, 10/104, 2004. |
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.; “Hemodynamics and Cuff Technology”, 2005. |
Batson, R.C., M.D. et al; “Linton Patch Angioplasty”, Ann. Surg., pp. 684-693, vol. 199, No. 6, Jun. 1984. |
Beard, J.D. et al, Haemodynamics of the Interposition Vein Cuff, Sr. J. Surg, vol. 73, No. 10, pp. 823-825, Oct. 1986. |
Da Silva, A.F. et al, “Stable Vortices Within Vein Cuffs Inhibit Anastomotic Myointimal Hyperplasia”, Eur J Vase Sura, vol. 14, pp. 157-163, 1997. |
EP 98921634.6 filed May 15, 2008 Office Action dated May 5, 2004. |
EP 98921634.6 filed May 15, 2008 Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2004. |
Escobar, Francisco S. III et al, “Comparison of a New Hooded Graft With a Conventional ePTFE Graft: A Preliminary Study”, Vascular Access for Hemodialysis VI, pp. 205-212, 1999. |
Fisher, R.K. et al, “Harnessing Haemodynamic Forces for the Suppression of Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: the Rationale for Precuffed Grafts”, Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg, vol. 21, pp. 520-528, 2001. |
Gagne, P. J. et al, “The Effect of a Venous Anastomosis Tyrell Vein Collar on the Primary Patency of Arteriovenous Grafts in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis”, J Vase Surg, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1149-1154, 2000. |
Green, R. M. et al, “Prosthetic Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafting: Five-Year Results of a Randomized Trial”, J Vasc Surg, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 417-425, Mar. 2000. |
Harris, Peter et al, “Haemodynamics of Cuffed Arterial Anastomoses”, Critical Ischaemia, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 20-26, 1999. |
How, T. V. et al, “Interposition Vein Cuff Anastomosis Alters Wall Shear Stress Distribution in the Recipient Artery”, J Vasc Surg, vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1008-1017, May 2000. |
Impra, Inc, “Suturing Technique for Venaflo ePTFE Vascular Graft & Venaflo Graft with Carbon”, 1998. |
Impra, Inc, “Tunneling Technique for Venaflo ePTFE Vascular Graft & Venaflo Graft with Carbon”, 1999. |
Jamieson, et al, “Vascular Surgery”, 5th Edition, ISBN 04 12586 304, pp. 330-340, 1994. |
Krueger et al, “Importance of Correct Trimming of Venaflo Grafts Proven by CFD”, 4th International Congress of the Vascular Access Society, Berlin, Germany, May 25, 2005. |
Lei, Ming et al, “Computational Design of a Bypass Graft That Minimizes Wall Shear Stress Gradients in the Region of the Distal Anastomosis”, Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 637-646, Apr. 1997. |
Lemson, M.S. et al, “Effects of a Venous Cuff at the Venous Anastomosis of Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts for Femodialysis Vascular Access”, J Vasc Surg, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1155-1163, Dec. 2000. |
Loh, A. et al, “PTFE Bypass Grafting to Isolated Popliteal Segments in Critical Limb Ischaemia”, Eur J Vasc Sur, vol. 7, pp. 26-30, Jan. 1993. |
Nyberg et al, “Preliminary Experience with a Cuffed ePTFE Graft for Hemodialysis Vascular Access”, Asaio Journel, vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 333-337, Jul./Aug. 2001. |
Panneton, J. M., MD., “Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing a Pre-Cuffed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft to a Vein Cuffed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Infragenicular Arterial Bypass”, Ann Vasc Sura, vol. 18, pp. 199-206, Mar. 15, 2004. |
PCT/GB1998/001418 filed May 15, 1998 International Preliminary Examination Report dated Aug. 25, 1999. |
PCT/GB1998/001418 filed May 15, 1998 International Search Report dated Sep. 2, 1998. |
PCT/GB1998/001418 filed May 15, 1998 Written Opinion dated Sep. 2, 1998. |
PCT/US2008/088312 filed Dec. 24, 2008 Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2009. |
PCT/US2008/088312 filed Dec. 24, 2008 Written Opinion dated Feb. 13, 2009. |
Queen Elisabeth Hospital Berlin, “Documentation of Comparative Flow Investigations of the Conventional Anastomosis and ‘Venaflo II’ Anastomosis by a Pulsatile Circulating Model”. |
Scholz, Hans M.D. et al, “Five Years' Experience With an Arteriovenous Patch Prosthesis as Access for Hemodialysis”, Vascular Access for Hemodialysis VI, pp. 241-254, 1999. |
Sivanesan, S. et al, “Flow Patterns in the Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistular: An In Intro Study”, J Biomech, vol. 32, pp. 915-925, 1999. |
Sorom, AJ. et al, “Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of a Cuffed Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Hemodialysis Vascular Access”, Surgery, vol. 132, No. 2, Aug. 2002. |
Stonebridge, P.A. et al, “Randomized Trial Comparing Infrainguinal Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass Grafting With and Without Vein Interpostion Cuff at the Distal Anastomosis”, J Vasc Sur, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 543-550, Oct. 1997. |
Tyrrell, M.R. et al, “New Prosthetic Venous Collar Anastomotic Technique: Combining the Best of Other Procedures”, British J Sur, vol. 78, pp. 1016-1017, Aug. 1991. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Advisory Action dated Dec. 3, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Advisory Action dated Jun. 8, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Advisory Action dated Sep. 4, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/842,582, filed May 10, 2004 Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/842,582, filed May 10, 2004 Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/842,582, filed May 10, 2004 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Advisory Action dated Nov. 23, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Final Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,822, filed Jun. 25, 2010 Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,822, filed Jun. 25, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Non-Final Office Action dated May 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Advisory Action dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Decision on Appeal dated Jan. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/603,952, filed Jun. 25, 2003 Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/408,330, filed Apr. 21, 2006 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060030935 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10842582 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11239416 | US | |
Parent | 09898793 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10842582 | US | |
Parent | 09125907 | US | |
Child | 09898793 | US |