The present invention relates to reduction in aircraft noise, and in particular to aircraft noise generated by the airframe of the aircraft during operation.
One of the more important constraints to the continued growth of air traffic is the related concern regarding aircraft noise. This concern has resulted in increasingly stringent noise restrictions for airports. During aircraft take-off, the dominant aircraft noise source is generally the propulsion noise from the engines of the aircraft. During aircraft approach and landing, airframe noise becomes a prominent component on par with the engine noise. This airframe noise is caused by the interaction of the unsteady and typically turbulent airflow with the aircraft structures. The sound radiated from the side edge of a partial-span flap is one of the major contributors to airframe noise during aircraft approach and landing.
Acoustic liners have been used to absorb propulsion noise within aircraft engine nacelles. Acoustic liners with variable-depth chambers to achieve broadband noise attenuation have been known for some time.
One aspect of the present invention is a flap of the type that is movably connected to an aircraft wing to provide control of an aircraft in flight. The flap includes a flap structure defining inboard and outboard ends, and forward and rearward portions in the form of leading and trailing edges extending between the inboard and outboard ends. The flap structure may be elongated or it may comprise a relatively short structure such as a flaperon. The elongated flap structure defines an upper side extending between the inboard and outboard ends and between the forward and rearward portions of the elongated flap structure. The upper side of the elongated flap structure generally faces upwardly in use, and the lower side generally faces downwardly in use. The inboard end defines an inwardly-facing inboard end surface, and the outboard end defines an outwardly-facing outboard end surface. The upper and lower sides define inboard and outboard end portions adjacent the inboard and outboard ends, respectively, that tend to experience significant local hydrodynamic fluctuations associated with the scrubbing of unsteady flow over the inboard and outboard end surfaces. These fluctuations tend to generate noise to form a noise source.
At least a portion of the inboard and/or outboard end surfaces, and/or the inboard and outboard end portions of the upper or lower side of the flap includes a substantially porous surface that is acoustically connected to chambers (or passageways) that are disposed within the elongated flap structure. Noise generated by the noise source enters the internal chambers through the openings, and a portion of that noise is absorbed to thereby reduce the amount of noise that would otherwise be transmitted to the surrounding environment. If the chambers are sufficiently small in diameter, are terminated within the flap structure, and are not allowed to communicate with other internal chambers, the structure forms a local-reacting liner. If the chambers are large in diameter, or are interconnected, the structure forms an extended-reacting liner. Thus, noise absorption is achieved via all of the conventional acoustic liner mechanisms (e.g. viscothermal losses within the chamber, vortex shedding). The impedance boundary condition present at the surface of the porous surface also provides a pressure-release condition that may reduce the local hydrodynamic fluctuations, thereby inhibiting the noise generation process.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall be related to the invention as oriented in
An aircraft 1 (
Wing 3 may include upper and lower surfaces 11 and 12 extending between a leading edge 13 and a trailing edge 14. The aircraft may include an elongated flap structure 10 that is movably connected to the wing 3 adjacent rear edge 14. The flap 10 is movably interconnected with the wing 3 by connectors 15 to provide control of aircraft 1. In general, powered actuators (not shown) or the like may be utilized to provide movement of flap structure 10 relative to the wing 3. The connecting structures 15 and powered actuators may also be of a conventional type, and are not therefore described in detail herein.
The flap structure 10 includes inboard and outboard ends 20 and 22, respectively, and forward and rearward portions 24 and 26, respectively. The flap structure 10 further includes an upper side 2S having an upper surface 29 and a lower side 30 having a lower surface 31 (see also
Wing design for conventional transport aircraft is driven largely by cruise efficiency, i.e., the need to generate adequate lift with minimal drag for level flight at high speeds. Conventional high-lift systems (leading-edge slats and trailing-edge flaps) are designed to augment lift and improve stall characteristics at the low landing speeds required under many circumstances. These multi-element airfoil systems increase the effective chord (streamwise dimension) of the wing and thus its effective area. The major effect of the multi-element airfoil arrangement is to generate a much larger pressure difference (lift) between the upper (suction) and lower (pressure) surfaces than would be possible utilizing a single airfoil element. However, the multi-element implementation of the high-lift system presents many discontinuities and other unfavorable geometric characteristics to the flow. These geometric features cause considerable unsteadiness in the flow, which is the primary source of aeroacoustic noise.
The principal geometric features responsible for producing flow unsteadiness around flap 10, and thus noise, are the inboard and outboard edges 21 and 23, respectively, at the inboard and outboard ends 20 and 22, respectively. Computational results display strong suction peaks at the inboard and outboard edges 21 and 23, respectively of flap 10. The suction peaks are attributed to the presence of strong stream-wise vortices. Existence of a strong pressure differential between the bottom and top surfaces of the flap results in the formation of a complex dual-vortex system. Specifically, near the flap leading edge, the boundary layer on the bottom surface separates at the sharp corner and rolls up to form a stronger of the two vortices. Similarly, the thin boundary layer on the side edge separates at the sharp top corner and forms what is initially the weaker of the two vortices. Both vortices gain strength and size along the flap chord because of the sustained generation of vorticity. Downstream of the flap mid-chord, the side vortex begins to interact and merge with the vortex on the top surface. Eventually, a single dominant stream-wise vortex is formed.
Considerable flow unsteadiness (noise sources) is produced during the shear layer roll up, vortex formation and vortex merging process as well as by the interaction of the vortices with the sharp corners at the flap edge. The multi-element airfoil reverts to a smooth single-element profile during the cruise phase of flight to reduce wing drag. In current practice, the multiple airfoil elements are nested together in a retracted position.
The present invention includes a method and structure that reduces this source of airframe noise without compromising cruise efficiency, lift, and stall characteristics at landing. As discussed in more detail below, one aspect of the present invention is the use of acoustic liners that are imbedded within the flap structure 10 to target the propagation phase of acoustic disturbances generated elsewhere. It also targets the very process of noise generation via interaction of the unsteady flow with the flap side edges 21 and 23. By limiting the control action to fluctuations within the flow, the gross aerodynamic characteristics are left unaltered and, hence, the expected aerodynamic penalty is small or none at all. However, the limited volume within the flap edge creates a significant packaging challenge. In addition, the broad frequency range (potentially greater than 3.5 octaves) to be attenuated creates additional challenges.
Known technology used in current commercial aircraft to reduce noise generated at the flap side edges involves implementation of “clean” configurations. Prior concepts include the application of fences, continuous moldline link, porous treatment, and brushes at the flap side edges. Given the critical functionality of aircraft flaps in the control of the aircraft, reconfiguration of this system may be problematic. The known concepts offer a range of noise reduction potentials, but they also have disadvantages ranging from weight penalties, parasitic drag penalties during cruise, and/or a loss of aerodynamic efficiency.
With further reference to
The acoustic liner 34 comprises a thin sheet of material 46 having a plurality of perforations 47 arranged in a substantially uniform repeating pattern to thereby define a porous upper surface portion 48. The perforations 47 may also be arranged in a non-uniform pattern that may or may not be repeating. Porous upper surface 48 may be formed by a thin sheet of material having a plurality of perforations 51, or it may comprise a mesh, or it may be defined by the upper most surfaces of wing 3 adjacent to the openings of the internal chambers (or passageways) 60 (
Similarly, acoustic liner 36 at end 22 (or end 20) may comprise a sheet of material 50 having a plurality of perforations 51 defining a porous outer surface 58. Surface 58 may be substantially planar, or it may be curved. In general, surface 58 may have a shape/contour that is substantially identical to the shape/contour of the original end surface of flap 10 for a particular aircraft as originally designed by an aircraft manufacturer. Alternately, surface 58 may be specifically contoured to optimize aerodynamics and/or noise reduction taking into account changes to airflow resulting from the presence of one or more acoustic liners according to the present invention. Similarly, acoustic liner 38 on the bottom 30 of flap 10 may comprise a thin sheet of material 54 having a plurality of perforations 55 that permit sound to enter acoustic internal chambers 60 formed in body 18 of flap structure 10. The flap 10 may include only a top acoustic liner 34, or it may include only an end acoustic liner 36, or only a bottom acoustic liner 38, or it may include any combination of the liners 34, 36, and 38, depending upon the requirements of a particular application. Also, the acoustic liners 34, 36, and 38 may cover substantially all of the upper and lower surfaces at end portion 40, or they may extend over only a segment of end portion 40 of flap structure 10. Similarly, the end acoustic liner 36 may cover substantially all of the end 20 (or 21), or it may cover only a portion thereof. The acoustic liners 34 and/or 36 and/or 38 are designed to absorb sound having a specific acoustic frequency profile, and to provide optimum aerodynamic characteristics.
With further reference to
With further reference to
The internal chambers 60 (or the entire flap interior) can also be filled with foam or other acoustic filler material, which changes the manner in which sound is absorbed as it travels through the flap 10.
The flap 10 may include a single internal chamber 60, a plurality of substantially identical internal chambers 60, or a plurality of internal chambers 60 having different lengths and/or shapes. If a number of variable-depth chambers, separated by impervious partitions and terminated within the body of the flap, are imbedded within the flap side edge 21 (or 23), a local-reacting liner results. In the configuration shown in
With further reference to
The acoustic liners may also comprise extended-reaction liners. For example, the internal volume of the flap side edge 21 (or 23) may be filled with a bulk material such as foam, and allowing communication between the interior and exterior of the flap side edge via a porous surface such as a perforated face sheet, wire mesh, or the like.
Because of the porous nature of one or more segments of the flap surface near the side edge 21 (or 22), the aeroacoustic environment outside the flap 10 can communicate with the chamber or chambers 60 within the flap 10. As discussed above, the interior volume of the flap 10 contains one or more chambers 60, which may or may not be filled with sound-absorbent acoustic material such as a porous bulk material such as, but not limited to, foam or the like. The acoustic treatment imbedded within the volume of the flap 10 changes the boundary condition at the surface of the flap 10, such that the strength of the local hydrodynamic fluctuations associated with the scrubbing of the unsteady flow over the side edge surface is reduced. Furthermore, the change in the boundary condition also inhibits the conversion of hydrodynamic fluctuations into noise, and also inhibits near field propagation of this noise. The boundary condition presented at the porous surface is such that it inhibits sound from being generated by the flow interaction with this surface.
Software design tools are available to assist in the design of the interior chambers 60 of the flap 10. Known software previously utilized for design of acoustic liners in engine nacelles may be utilized to assist in the design of chambers 60. Such software may also be modified somewhat to thereby adapt it for use in designing chambers 60 in flap 10. The use of these design tools allows the efficient design of acoustic liners with multiple chambers, each of which can be designed with unique geometries. This design tool also allows a convenient evaluation of configurations designed to fit within a small volume, while exploring combinations of chambers that result in broadband noise reduction.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/417,349 and 13/417,351 filed on Mar. 12, 2012. This application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/451,727, filed on Mar. 11, 2011; No. 61/451,730 filed on Mar. 11, 2011; No. 61/451,735 filed on Mar. 11, 2011; and No. 61/597,282, filed on Feb. 10, 2012, the entire contents of all which are incorporated by reference.
The invention described herein was made in part by employees of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefore.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3612446 | Lebert | Oct 1971 | A |
3779338 | Hayden et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3821999 | Guess et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3853428 | Hayden et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4240250 | Harris | Dec 1980 | A |
6454219 | Moe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6948906 | Leishman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7484930 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7637462 | Pal | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8033510 | Shmilovich et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056850 | Lin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8096513 | Mau et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040197194 | Leishman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070020099 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090084905 | Mau et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100294883 | Trich s et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
D. Angland, et al., “Measurements of Flow around a Flap Side-Edge with Porous Edge Treatment,” AIAA 2006-213, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Jan. 9-12, 2006, pp. 1-22, Reno, Nevada. |
D. Angland, et al., “Measurements of Flow around a Flap Side Edge with Porous Edge Treatment,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 7, 2009, pp. 1660-1671, vol. 47, No. 7. |
Tony L. Parrott, et al., “Paraliel-element liner impedances for improved absorption of broadband sound in ducts,” Noise Control Engineering Journal, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 183-195, vol. 43(6). |
L. S. Wirt, “Analysis, Testing, and Design of Lined Ducts.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, May 1972, pp. 1448-1463, vol. 51(5), Part 1. |
Tony L Parrott, et al., “Effect of Resonator Axis Skew on Normal Incidence Impendance,” AIAA 2003-3307, 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 12-14, 2003, pp. 1-8, Hilton Head, South Carolina. |
Brian M. Howerton, et al., “Validation of an Acoustic Impendance Prediction Model for Skewed Resonators,” AIAA 2009-3143, May 2009, pp. 1-21. |
M. G. Jones, et al., “Assessment of Soft Vane and Metal Foam Engine Noise Reduction Concepts.” AIAA 2009-3142, May 2009, pp. 1-20. |
Mehdi R. Khorrami, et al., “Application of Passive Porous Treatment to Slat Trailing Edge Noise,” NASA/TM-2003-212416, May 2003, pp. 1-14. |
Mehdi R. Krorrami, et al., “Novel Approach for Reducing Rotor Tip-Clearance-Induced Noise in Turbofan Engines,” AIAA Journal, Aug. 2002, pp. 1518-1528, vol. 40, No. 8. |
Meelan Choudhari, et al., “Computational Study of Porous Treatment for Altering Flap Side-Edge Flowfieid,” AIAA 2003-3113, 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 12-14, 2003, pp. 1-15. Hilton Head, South Carolina. |
W. Clifton Horne, et al., “Measurements of 26%-scale 777 Airframe Noise in the NASA Ames 40-by 80 Foot Wind Tunnel,” AIAA, 2005-2810, 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (26th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), May 23-25, 2005, pp. 1-19, Monterey, California. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61451727 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61597282 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61451730 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61451735 | Mar 2011 | US |