The present invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and, more specifically, to turbine blades therein.
In a gas turbine engine, air is pressurized in a compressor and mixed with fuel for generating combustion gases in a combustor. Various turbine stages extract energy from the combustion gases to power the engine and produce work.
A high pressure turbine (HPT) immediately follows the combustor and extracts energy from the hottest combustion gases to power the upstream compressor through one drive shaft. A low pressure turbine (LPT) follows the HPT and extracts additional energy from the combustion gases for powering another drive shaft. The LPT powers an upstream fan in a turbofan aircraft engine application, or powers an external shaft for marine and industrial applications.
Engine efficiency and specific fuel consumption (SFC) are paramount design objectives in modern gas turbine engines. The various turbine rotor blades and their corresponding nozzle vanes have precisely configured aerodynamic surfaces for controlling the velocity and pressure distributions thereover for maximizing aerodynamic efficiency.
The corresponding airfoils of the blades and vanes have generally concave pressure sides and generally convex suction sides extending axially in chord between opposite leading and trailing edges. The airfoil has a crescent profile in radial section, increasing rapidly in width from the leading edge to a maximum width region, and then decreasing in width gradually to the trailing edge.
The circumferentially or transversely opposite sides of the airfoils also extend radially in span from root to tip. The airfoils typically have thin sidewalls formed by casting of superalloy metals, with internal cooling circuits having various embodiments all specifically tailored for efficiently cooling the airfoils during operation while maximizing efficiency.
However, aerodynamic design of turbine airfoils is remarkably complex in view of the three dimensional (3D) configurations of the individual airfoils in complete rows thereof, and the correspondingly complex flow streams of the combustion gases channeled between the airfoils during operation. Adding to this complexity of design and environment are the special flow fields around the radially outer tips of the turbine blades which rotate at high speed inside a surrounding stationary shroud during operation.
The operating clearance or gap between the blade tips and the turbine shrouds should be as small as practical for minimizing leakage of the combustion gas flow therethrough while also permitting thermal expansion and contraction of the blades and shrouds without undesirable rubbing between the rotating tips and stationary shroud.
During operation, the blades in a turbine row drive the supporting rotor disk in rotation with the airfoil suction side leading the opposite airfoil pressure side. The airfoils typically twist from root to tip in the radial direction from the perimeter of the rotor disk, and the leading edges face upstream obliquely with the engine axial centerline axis to match the oblique discharge swirl angle of the cooperating nozzle vanes. The combustion gases flow generally in the axial downstream direction, with a circumferential or tangential component first engaging the airfoil leading edges in one flow direction, and then leaving the airfoils over the trailing edges thereof in a different flow direction.
The pressure and suction sides of the airfoils have correspondingly different 3D profiles for maximizing differential pressure therebetween and energy extraction from the hot combustion gases. The concave pressure side and the convex suction side effect different velocity and pressure distributions thereover which correspondingly vary between the leading and trailing edges, and from root to tip. However, the combustion gases which leak over the airfoil tips in the required tip clearance perform little, if any, useful work.
Further complicating turbine blade design is the exposed blade tips which are therefore bathed in the combustion gases which leak thereover during operation, and require suitable cooling thereof for ensuring a long useful life of the turbine blades during operation.
Modern turbine blade design typically incorporates squealer tip ribs which are small radial extensions of the pressure and suction sides of the airfoil from leading to trailing edge. The tip ribs are typically rectangular in cross section and spaced transversely or circumferentially apart to define an open tip cavity atop the airfoil which has an integral tip floor that encloses the typically hollow airfoil and the internal cooling circuit therein.
The small tip ribs provide sacrificial material in the event of a tip rub to protect the tip floor and internal cooling circuit from undesirable damage. The tip ribs increase the complexity of the combustion gas flow field introducing local secondary fields which affect turbine efficiency, flow leakage, and tip cooling.
The primary flow direction of the combustion gases is in the axially downstream direction in the flow passages defined between adjacent blades. The axial flow stream also varies along the radial direction from root to tip of each airfoil. And, these axial and radial flow variations are further compounded over the airfoil tip where the combustion gases leak between the pressure and suction sides of each airfoil.
Accordingly, the prior art is replete with various configurations of turbine blade tips addressing different problems and performance considerations including turbine efficiency, tip leakage, and tip cooling. These three important considerations are interdependent at least in part, but the complex 3D flow fields over the different pressure and suction sides at the airfoil tip and between the leading and trailing edges renders quite complex the evaluation thereof.
However, modern computational fluid dynamics (CFD) includes powerful software that improves the ability to mathematically analyze complex 3D flow streams in gas turbine engines and provides a mechanism from which further improvements in turbine blade design may be realized.
For example, it is desired to improve turbine blade tip design by reducing tip flow leakage, or increasing turbine efficiency, or improving tip cooling, or any combination of these factors either separately or together.
A turbine blade includes an airfoil terminating in a tip. The tip includes a first rib conforming with a concave pressure side of the airfoil, and a second rib conforming with a convex suction side of the airfoil. The second rib is flared outwardly from the suction side.
The invention, in accordance with preferred and exemplary embodiments, together with further objects and advantages thereof, is more particularly described in the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The dovetail 16 may have any conventional form, such as the axial-entry dovetail illustrated in
During operation, combustion gases 18 are generated in the combustor of the engine (not shown) and suitably channeled downstream over the corresponding turbine blades 10 which extract energy therefrom for powering the supporting rotor disk. The individual platform 14 provides a radially inner boundary for the combustion gases and adjoins adjacent platforms in the full row of turbine blades.
The airfoil 12 illustrated in
The external surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 20,22 of the airfoil have the typical crescent shape or profile conventionally configured for effecting corresponding velocity and pressure distributions of the combustion gases thereover during operation for maximizing energy extraction from the gases.
The airfoil 12 is typically hollow and includes an internal cooling circuit 32 which may have any conventional configuration, such as the illustrated two three-pass serpentine circuits that terminate in corresponding flow passages behind the leading edge and in front of the trailing edge. The cooling circuit extends through the platform and dovetail with corresponding inlets in the base of the dovetail for receiving pressurized cooling air 34 from the compressor of the engine (not shown) in any conventional manner.
In this way, the blade is internally cooled from root to tip and between the leading and trailing edges by the internal cooling air which then may be discharged through the thin airfoil sidewalls in various rows of film cooling holes of conventional size and configuration.
Since the leading edge of the airfoil is typically subject to the hottest incoming combustion gases, dedicated cooling thereof is provided in any suitable manner. And, the thin trailing edge region of the airfoil typically includes a row of pressure side trailing edge cooling slots for discharging a portion of the spent cooling air.
As described above, the turbine airfoil 12 shown initially in
Furthermore, the relative pressure of the combustion gases on the pressure side 20 of the airfoil is higher than the pressure along the suction side of the airfoil, and along with the corresponding rotation of the blade during operation introduces further secondary or tertiary affects in the combustion gas flow field as it flows radially up and over the exposed airfoil tip 30 during operation.
The turbine rotor blade described above may be conventional in configuration and operation for use in a gas turbine engine, including for example the first stage of the HPT. The conventional blade may then be modified as described hereinbelow at the airfoil tip 30 to include first and second squealer tip ribs 36,38 which are radially integral extensions of the airfoil pressure and suction sides, or sidewalls, 20,22, respectively, and conform in profile or curvature therewith.
The first or pressure side rib 36 conforms chordally with the shape or profile of the concave pressure side 20 of the airfoil, and correspondingly, the second or suction side rib 38 conforms in chordal profile with the convex suction side 22 of the airfoil.
As best shown in
The tip cavity includes a tip floor 42 which bridges the opposite pressure and suction sidewalls of the airfoil to enclose the radially outer end of the airfoil and the internal cooling circuit 32. The tip floor 42 is typically solid, but may have small cooling holes or dust holes (not shown) for discharging some of the spent air from the internal cooling circuit in any conventional manner.
As described above, the two ribs 36,38 provide short radial extensions of the corresponding pressure and suction sidewalls of the airfoil and introduce the recessed tip cavity for improving performance and longevity of the turbine blade. The small ribs may accommodate occasional tip rubbing in the turbine and protect the internal cooling circuit 32 therefrom. However, the tip cavity also provides a local region over which the combustion gases flow during operation as they leak over the tip between the pressure and suction sides of the blade.
In order to further improve performance of the turbine blade initially illustrated in
On the airfoil suction side, the flare 44 commences at and extends from the airfoil leading edge 24 and extends along the second rib 38 continuously therewith in the downstream direction toward the trailing edge.
The flare 44 continues along the second rib 38 to terminate near the airfoil maximum width at the tip 30 as illustrated in
Whereas the second rib 38 itself extends continuously from the leading edge 24 to the trailing edge 26 where it joins the first rib 36, the flare 44 blends away or terminates into the airfoil suction side 22 immediately aft of the airfoil maximum width at the tip. For example, the flared second rib 38 may extend aft to about 10%-30% of the chord length of the airfoil between the leading and trailing edges. The remaining 70%-90% of the chord length over the aft end of the suction side may be flareless, with a coplanar continuation of the external surface of the suction side 22 over the full outboard surface of the second rib 38 aft of the terminated flare 44.
Accordingly, by introducing the flare 44 on the suction side second rib 38 an additional overhang restriction is provided in opposition to the free flow of the local streamlines.
The flared second rib 38 along the suction side of the airfoil introduces an effective flow restriction for the combustion gases as they flow radially outwardly over the leading edge region of the airfoil as shown schematically in
To complement performance of the flared second rib around the leading edge 24, the pressure side first rib 36 illustrated in
The flared first rib 36 as shown in
The width or extent of the overhanging flares 44 may vary as desired over the varying contours of the airfoil suction and pressure sides. For example, the width of the suction side flare 44 may be substantially constant from its end termination with the suction side forward to its commencement around the airfoil leading edge 24.
The width of the flare around the leading edge may then increase to maximum width on the pressure side immediately aft of the leading edge as illustrated in
Due to the differential pressure distribution between the opposite pressure and suction sides 20,22 shown in
However, the predominant direction of the combustion gas streamlines at the airfoil leading edge 24 illustrated in
The flared first and second ribs 36,38 illustrated in
Since the flares 44 introduce local interruptions in the aerodynamic contours of the opposite pressure and suction sides 20,22, their size should be as small as possible or as small as practical for resisting tip leakage without decreasing turbine efficiency attributable to the flares themselves.
The flares 44 are preferably concave outwardly from the opposite sidewalls of the airfoil and blend tangentially therewith in the radial transverse sections shown in
The flared ribs 36,38 illustrated in
For example, various cooling holes (not shown) may be provided through the tip floor 42 for discharging spent cooling air from the internal cooling circuit 32 into the tip cavity 40 for cooling the inboard surfaces of the two ribs. Also, film cooling holes may be provided through the sidewalls 20,22 just below the flares for external film cooling thereof.
The inboard surfaces of the two ribs may be radially straight extensions of the inner surfaces of the two sidewalls 20,22, in which case the flares 44 add additional mass to the blade.
However, the inboard surfaces of the two ribs 36,38 may have convex flares, shown in dashed line in
CFD analysis has been conducted for exemplary designs of the turbine blade disclosed above. The baseline blade (not shown) is without flares and has the typical rectangular cross-sectioned pressure and suction side tip ribs. The analysis indicates that the introduction of the pressure side flare 44 alone between the leading and trailing edges 24,26 can significantly improve aerodynamic efficiency of the turbine blade while also significantly reducing leakage of the combustion gases over the airfoil tip.
The analysis also predicts that the introduction of the suction side flare 44 while not necessarily further increasing efficiency of the blade can nevertheless further reduce, quite substantially, leakage of the combustion gases over the airfoil tip.
The introduction of the suction side flare 44 preferentially located as described above therefore has the ability to significantly reduce airfoil tip leakage during operation irrespective of any effect on aerodynamic efficiency, and quite significantly not adversely affecting turbine efficiency.
As indicated above, turbine efficiency, tip leakage, and tip cooling are significant design objectives in gas turbines and may be interdependent in accordance with the complex 3D flow field. Analysis confirms that the pressure and suction side flares described above perform differently on the opposite sides of the airfoil. The pressure side tip flare is effective for substantially increasing turbine efficiency while secondarily decreasing tip leakage.
In contrast, the suction side tip flare is effective for decreasing tip leakage due to its local affect on the incident combustion streamlines, with little, if any, affect on efficiency.
Accordingly, the suction side tip flare may be used independently of and without the pressure side tip flare in alternate embodiments. And, either side flare may be used with other features as desired for improving performance of HPT rotor blades.
While there have been described herein what are considered to be preferred and exemplary embodiments of the present invention, other modifications of the invention shall be apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein, and it is, therefore, desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3012709 | Schnell | Dec 1961 | A |
3635585 | Metzler | Jan 1972 | A |
3781129 | Aspinwall | Dec 1973 | A |
4010531 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4142824 | Anderson | Mar 1979 | A |
4390320 | Eiswerth | Jun 1983 | A |
4424001 | North et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4606701 | McClay et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4893987 | Lee et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4940388 | Lilleker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4992025 | Stroud et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5261789 | Butts et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282721 | Kildea | Feb 1994 | A |
5476364 | Kildea | Dec 1995 | A |
5503527 | Lee et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5564902 | Tomita | Oct 1996 | A |
5660523 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
5720431 | Sellers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6039531 | Suenaga et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059530 | Lee | May 2000 | A |
6086328 | Lee | Jul 2000 | A |
6164914 | Correia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6224336 | Kercher | May 2001 | B1 |
6527514 | Rueloffs | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554575 | Leeke et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6595749 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6672829 | Cherry et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6790005 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7029235 | Liang | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030170120 | Grunke et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050244270 | Liang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1428165 | Feb 1969 | DE |
53077319 | Jul 1978 | JP |
2004124813 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005106207 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mischo, B., “Flow Physics and Profiling of Recessed Blade Tips: Impact on Performance and Heat Load,” ASME GT2006-91074, May 8-11, 2006, pp. 1-11. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/162,433, “Turbine Airfoil with Curved Squealer Tip,” filed Sep. 9, 2005, M.E. Stegemiller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/162,434, “Turbine Airfoil Curved Squealer Tip with Tip Shelf,” filed Sep. 9, 2005, M.E. Stegemiller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,116, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,120, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,121, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,132, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by Ching-Pang Lee et al. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 22, 2012 for EP application 07114370.5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100221122 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |