The present invention relates to improvements to stapling. More precisely, the present invention relates to a mechanism for flat clinched staple legs.
In desktop or other office and related type staplers, an anvil operates below a stack of papers to bend staple legs behind the paper. Such clinching binds the papers together. A typical anvil is made of a hard steel plate including two adjacent arcuate depressions. During the stapling process, the staple legs enter an outer portion of the depressions and slide within the depressions to form a rounded or looped clinch. The legs are formed at the same time that the staple is being ejected from the stapler. This system is simple and normally effective for binding papers. However, the looped legs protrude from the face of the backside of the paper stack. As a result, the stack becomes thicker at the location of the staple. When multiple stapled paper stacks are stored together, as in a file cabinet, folder, or binder, the corners with the looped staples fan out whereby the adjacent stack is pushed away by the staple loop at the corner. The capacity of document storage thus becomes reduced.
Forming the loop also uses excess extra energy since the wire is bent upon an extended portion of its length. Further, the maximum thickness of a paper stack is limited since a very short leg segment cannot be looped. For example, a loop type form with a standard 26/6 staple may be limited to about 30 sheets of 20 lb. paper in a best case.
Another type of clinch is of a flat configuration. The staple leg remains relatively straight as it is bent behind the stack. An advantage of this design is a more compact assembly of stacks. The staple legs are substantially parallel and adjacent to the backside paper face whereby adjacent stacks can rest very near to each other at the staple location. An assembly of flat clinched stacks thus is more compact in storage than that of looped staple stacks. The straight segment may allow binding up to 40 sheets with a high quality standard size staple. Further, to some consumers, a flat clinch is of better appearance than a loop type.
A typical flat clinch design operates in two distinct stages. In a first step the staple is ejected from the stapling device. The staple legs are pushed through the papers to extend from the backside straight out or partially pre-bent by an element of the anvil. A second step has the legs being fully bent against the stack backside by an externally powered component. According to this procedure, the bending step must be timed in relation to the first ejection step through a timing action external to the base. Therefore, the staple ejecting mechanism, for example, in the main body portion of a desktop stapler, must be operatively linked to the base portion that includes the anvil. In the case of a manually-operated stapler, for example, the second step starts at a predetermined position of the handle with a conspicuous clunk. Further, this linkage is mechanically complex. Such connection also normally precludes an option to open the base away from the body for use as a tacker since the body and base are tied together by this flat clinch linkage. An electric powered stapler similarly requires complex linkages in typical flat clinch designs to link the motor to the secondary clinching action. It is therefore desired to have a flat clinch stapler with a simplified design wherein the clinching action is enabled primarily or entirely within the base.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a stapler includes a simplified flat clinch mechanism. The sequence of clinching actions including bending the staple legs is enabled or triggered by the position or motion of those staple legs. In this respect the action is similar to a basic loop type anvil where the movement of the staple legs inherently causes the legs to bend. However, in the preferred embodiment, there are separately movable elements in the anvil that act sequentially upon the legs as a direct result of the leg motion.
In the preferred embodiments, the anvil includes a slot or equivalent structure to receive staple legs. In preferred embodiments reciprocating arms are pivotally mounted at each end of the slot, extending within the slot toward the center of the slot. The arms are resiliently biased, as by a spring, toward the top of the slot with the arms having a normal rest position flush or nearly so with the top of the slot. The nearly flush condition may include the arms being above or below the top of the slot or equivalent structure. An ejected staple impacts and deflects the arms momentarily downward. The arms then return toward their rest position to flick the staple legs up against the paper face. The staple legs thus may effectively create a temporary anvil cavity where there normally is not one. This feature contrasts with conventional flat clinch designs where the anvil cavity is normally present before the staple legs enter it. In such prior designs, the legs enter with minimal or no contact with structures of the anvil; although slight initial bending may occur. The legs are next fully bent up to be clinched by way of actions external to the anvil area.
As described above according to one aspect of the invention, the arms or other movable structure that deflect the staple legs are directly moved and/or energized by the staple legs rather than by further linkages or structures external to the anvil area, although such connections may be used if desired. For example, there is no need for a connection to a stapler body, handle, motor or other such elements to move and energize the deflecting structure.
For effective operation of the flat clinch anvil, the staple should preferably be ejected at high speed. For example, a spring-energized stapler will provide such high-speed action. Optionally, a solenoid powered electric stapler may also provide suitable high-speed action. For the deflecting arms to operate efficiently the structure thereof should be, in the preferred embodiment, lightweight in relation to the staple wire. For example, a wire or thin metal strip that fits within the slot will be lightweight. High-speed motion combined with lightweight or low inertia arms allows the arms to deflect primarily or exclusively from the energy of the moving staple. Preferably the reciprocating mass of a toggle arm and linked moving parts are not great in comparison to the staple mass that actuates the system, for example a multiple of less than 5 or 10 times the staple weight.
In various embodiments, the arms may be constructed directly from the arms of a torsion spring. Preferably a square or rectangular wire is used to provide a flat upper surface to engage the staple leg point. Spring wire is naturally of a hard steel type that resists wear from the staple legs. In a further alternative embodiment, the arms may be constructed from rigid hardened steel parts and biased by a separately mounted spring. The rigid steel parts can be separately hardened to withstand harder staple wires such as those used in high capacity staplers if such extra hardness is desired. In any case, the structures of the preferred embodiments allow minimal reciprocating mass, and thus inertia, so the momentum of a staple can create useful motion and effects upon the working parts of the anvil assembly. In this manner there is no need for external linkages beyond the ejecting staple to actuate the system. For the torsion wire spring, it is preferred that the weight of the reciprocating arm is comparable to that of a staple—for example, within a similar order of magnitude, although other weight ratios may be used.
The flat clinch assembly according to one embodiment of the invention may be contained entirely within a forward portion or other suitable area of the stapler base. There need be no external links from the anvil assembly to internal or other operative parts of the stapling device. Among the benefits of this feature is the base can be rotated away from the body in a familiar way. For example the only substantially required link between the anvil area and the stapler body is the normal pivoting or equivalent link to the base while the toggle arms of the anvil assembly may operate independently from any motion at the base to body pivot. This link in the normal way serves primarily to position the body above the base. The stapler can then be used as a tacker. In contrast, conventional flat clinch staplers cannot be opened this way since the link between the body and the base that actuates the secondary clinching action ties the base to a limited movement in relation to the body. Further, the independent assembly of the preferred embodiment anvil assembly may be inexpensively fitted to a variety of conventional staplers with no substantial modification to such staplers.
Stapler 100 may be spring energized, electrically powered, or direct driven, and the like known in the art. In a typical spring energized stapler, striker 101 (
In
In
The present illustrated anvil assembly preferably includes only three components: frame 10 and two springs 20. Rivets (not shown) may be used at recesses 15 to bond the frame. As seen in
During the clinching action, the coil of spring 20 encounters a downward force from the staple leg 401 and an inward force from the reaction to end hook 24 against edge 13. So tab 11 biases the coil 20 upward while the frame edge 13 biases the coil 20 outward. Chamfer 18 corresponds to the local helical angle of the coil wire so that the wire does not press a sharp edge. This minimizes excessive wear and potential cyclical malfunction or failure. The structure described here allows for arm 21 to move generally freely and to extend within and be guided by the slot up to the coil position. Further, this illustrated embodiment frame assembly requires no additional components beyond the two springs 20 the frame 10 and optional rivets. Tab 12 confines coil 20 from the outside of frame 10. For assembly during production, spring 20 is installed from above and one or both of end hook 24 and arm 21 are snapped into their respective positions. Alternatively, a post attached to frame 10 may support coil 20 as shown below.
The slot of frame 10 is preferably open at the top between coils 20 or equivalent pivot locations of arms 21. For example, there is no tab crossing the top of the slot. This prevents jamming in the case of a stapler misfire where, for example, a staple leg extends outward. If there were a bridge such as a tab atop arm 21, staple leg 401 may become trapped by arm 21 under the tab. This has in fact been observed in such a model. However, if a gap is maintained between a bridge across the slot and spring 20, not shown, by for example a suitable spring rest position that does not press such a bridge then staple leg 401 can remain free to pull out.
To provide the open top structure, the preferred embodiment frame 10 may be formed as illustrated. A sheet metal form is bent at a bottom with recessed embosses 15 defining the gap distance of the slot. Embosses 15 may be spot-welded, riveted or otherwise bonded to hold the shape of frame 10. Bonding is performed preferably before heat treatment so that the frame maintains its shape during that process. Alternative types of spacers, shims, or shouldered rivets may be used in place of or in addition to embosses 15 to hold the shape of frame 10. Likewise, frame 10 may be of two opposed halves that are bonded as shown in
From empirical observations, the slot is preferably between about one to three times the width of an applicable staple wire, or between about 0.02 inch to about 0.07 inch for a standard staple; slot dimensions inclusive of the end limits and all widths in between the end limits are contemplated. In an exemplary working model, the slot is more preferably about two to three times the staple wire diameter or width. Other widths may be used when suited. Embosses 15 should preferably be positioned as close as possible to the staple entry area, shown at chamfer 16, to rigidly hold the size of the gap of the slot. However, embosses 15 or their equivalent structures should be positioned to clear all operative positions of arm 21.
It is desirable that there be some preload in spring arm 21 when it is in the pressed position at the level of the working surface as in
As seen in
Frame 10 may include protruding emboss 17 on one or both sides at least partly corresponding to the positions of bent spring legs 22a. This allows for some tolerance for slight misalignments in the bend. Likewise, the inside of the spring wire bend will thicken during fabrication from normal metal flow, and emboss 17 allows clearance for that as needed.
As seen in the drawing figures, the wire of spring 20 is preferably of a square or rectangular cross-section, referred to here as square for brevity. Rectangular cross-section further includes flat type springs in this example. The square cross-section includes a flat face oriented upward in the slot as seen in
The flat clinch systems disclosed herein operate best and reliably when friction is reduced. This best preserves the energy of the driven staple to operate arms 21 or equivalent structures and the energy for the rebound. Therefore, preferably hooked end 24 crosses past the frame slot so that lower arm 23 of spring 20 presses frame 10 at a plane aligned with arm 21 and the slot. When so aligned, pressing down on arm 21 creates an opposed reaction at hooked end 24 that is substantially directly aligned, or planar, with the slot. There are minimal sideways forces, up and down in
A further feature to reduce friction is to provide an optional coating to the elements of the assembly. For example, the spring arms or other toggle elements may be plated with nickel, chrome, or similar low friction coating or material. Then the staple legs may better slide upon the toggle to more easily fold. Similarly, the frame structure may be plated or coated to reduce friction from supported moving parts. The hard surface plating also reduces wear of the components. Plating further improves the appearance of the assembly. Coatings contemplated here include suitable lubricants such as grease or dry film.
As seen in
Frame 10 preferably includes open bottom portion 14. This provides edge 13 for holding lower arm 23. Such an opening may also help clear any staple jam. For example, if staple 400 is caught under spring arms 21, 23, it can be forcibly pushed out through opening 14. However, it is not anticipated that this condition or required action would be common.
In the present embodiment, toggle 70 may be hardened to the practical limit of the constituent steel. For typical carbon steel, this will be, for example, between 50 to 60 Rc hardness inclusive of the end limits and all values in between, with certain alloy steels allowing higher hardness values. In the case of arm 21 of spring 20, the limit may be defined by that of the spring wire from which it is made, where certain constraints on hardness may be present. The potentially harder discrete toggle 70 may be useful for harder high carbon staples as are used in high capacity staplers or other applications. Toggle 70 may be of stamped form or of a bent wire form, where such wire may be hardened after it is formed. Toggle 70 may be of higher mass than arm 21 in some conditions if desired since the toggle may be a taller sheet metal structure compared to a drawn wire arm.
As illustrated, frame 40 is formed in a similar manner as frame 10 above. Outer located crimps 45 may be spot welded, riveted or otherwise bonded to hold the folded metal form in the proper shape. Frame 40 is preferably then heat-treated. In a following step, rivet posts 60 are swaged into place by forming end 61. Other assembly sequences may be used, and as for frame 10 above, the present frame may optionally be formed from two separate halves. Optional chamfers 46 help provide a lead-in for an entering staple leg 401 as shown in
The method of operation for the present embodiment is similar to that for the first embodiment with frame 10 and springs 20. A staple 400 as shown on
For either the first embodiment of frame 10 or the second of frame 40, features of stapler base 120 may help to hold bias springs 20, 50 or other elements in position. In the instance of where arms 21 or toggles 70 have a rest position above the working surface, cover plate 150 (
Further alternative embodiments of the present invention are shown in
In
Mandrel tab 111,
As best seen in
The present exemplary embodiment further includes positive stop 116 for the spring arm. As illustrated, the stop 116 includes an inward crimp in the frame (
There remains a small gap at the crimp as seen in
In
Frame 140 includes tab 146 and recess 147 which mate to hold the elements in the assembly of
In the exemplary embodiments, the momentum or inertia of a quickly ejecting staple or equivalent fastener deflects moving parts of a flat clinch anvil to an energized position of the parts. The moving parts then re-set or rebound toward the rest position under the restorative force of a resilient bias. During the re-set action, the staple legs are folded upward to become at or near the level of the working surface. According to this action, a downward motion of a staple need not occur at the same moment as the legs are bent, but rather may be at least partly a sequential action. In the preferred embodiments, the staple leg folding process is enabled or controlled by elements entirely or substantially entirely within an anvil assembly with the energy for clinching being provided entirely or primarily by motion of the ejected staple. The moving staple forcibly creates the clearance recess to fit the staple legs where the recess is not normally present. No mechanical link to external actions is needed. Preferred embodiments of the present invention flat clinch anvil assembly are thus much simpler to manufacture by eliminating parts and reducing labor. The flat clinch anvil assembly is also a lot less bulky and can be easily adapted to use in staplers presently on the market without excessive modification and redesign.
Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention are described in a context of a flat clinch configuration, other shapes or bent states for staple legs may be achieved by the present invention. For example, a loop type clinch may be desired where use of the present invention provides improved efficiency. Further, the forming arms may be configured to provide more than a single bend in a staple leg, for example, a short bent segment at an end of a staple leg. In these instances, the pivoting spring arm or toggle may be arcuate or multi-segmented with respect to the side elevation views. Furthermore, as shown in the preceding descriptions, the staple legs may be bent in a bypass manner whereby one leg angles forward on the back of the paper stack while the other angles rearward. This configuration may be useful when a long legged staple is used on a short paper stack so that the two staple legs do not collide when clinched.
In another alternative embodiment (not shown), an external link may be provided for part of a leg folding process. For example, motion of a stapler handle in relation to a body, base or other component, or motion of the stapler body in relation to a base, or other action of the stapler may be linked to the anvil assembly. Such link may cause the resilient features of the anvil assembly to become deflected and energized. In this example, the legs of the ejecting staple may trigger the restorative motion in the anvil assembly to bend the legs. Or a further external action may trigger the restorative bias.
While particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is contemplated that components from one embodiment may be combined with components from another embodiment.
This non-provisional patent application claims benefit of priority from U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/755,894, filed on Jan. 23, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
389661 | Mandel et al. | Sep 1888 | A |
970461 | Briggs et al. | Sep 1910 | A |
1169339 | Maynard | Jan 1916 | A |
1252011 | Maynard | Jan 1918 | A |
1612870 | Leschhorn | Jan 1927 | A |
1773823 | Polzer | Aug 1930 | A |
1810528 | Peterson | Jun 1931 | A |
1852060 | Peterson | Apr 1932 | A |
1859951 | Blevney | May 1932 | A |
2267185 | Bauwens | Dec 1941 | A |
2320703 | Maynard | Jun 1943 | A |
2987729 | Taynton | Jun 1961 | A |
4194666 | Spehrley, Jr. et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4449661 | Spehrley, Jr. et al. | May 1984 | A |
4593847 | Hagemann | Jun 1986 | A |
4716813 | Prudencio | Jan 1988 | A |
4844319 | Kurosawa | Jul 1989 | A |
5004142 | Olesen | Apr 1991 | A |
5029745 | Akizawa et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038992 | Shiang et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5098002 | Hansch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5516025 | Eriksson | May 1996 | A |
5586710 | Golicz | Dec 1996 | A |
5678745 | Yoshie | Oct 1997 | A |
5758813 | Kikuchi | Jun 1998 | A |
6036074 | Manabe | Mar 2000 | A |
6056183 | Tanabe | May 2000 | A |
6164513 | Yoshie | Dec 2000 | A |
6193126 | Lee | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6371352 | Mochizuki | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6637635 | Borjesson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6820790 | Ura | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6981626 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6981627 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7044349 | Adams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7108165 | Tsai | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111378 | Aldana | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124925 | Ishizaki | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124926 | Tsai | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7228999 | Oide et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7334716 | Tsai | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7621433 | Ivarsson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644851 | Sugihara et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665645 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7832609 | Matsukawa | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7938306 | Sugihara et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
9114518 | Aoki | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030000992 | Borjesson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040262363 | Elonsson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050077338 | Ishizaki | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050269380 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060273134 | Smith et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070023474 | Smith | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070210135 | Ivarsson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210136 | Sugihara | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090072003 | Matsukawa | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090152318 | Matsukawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100096430 | Sugihara | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110062210 | Leung | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130001269 | Aoki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1394721 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1948022 | Apr 2007 | CN |
201257810 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101722502 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101811296 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102848353 | Jan 2013 | CN |
4434513 | Aug 1995 | DE |
0597782 | May 1994 | EP |
10-2010-0043021 | Apr 2010 | KR |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US14/12456, mailed May 14, 2014. |
http://www.bostitchoffice.com/news/detail.php?id=29. |
TW, 103102294 Official Letter, Jul. 11, 2016. |
TW, 103102294 Search Report, Jul. 11, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140203060 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61755894 | Jan 2013 | US |