Flat diffraction grating light valve

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5841579
  • Patent Number
    5,841,579
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 7, 1995
    29 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 24, 1998
    26 years ago
Abstract
A diffraction grating light valve modulates an incident beam of light. A plurality of elongated elements each have a reflective surface. The elongated elements are suspended with their respective ends substantially coplanar. Alternate ones of the elongated elements are electrically coupled for receiving a first bias voltage. The interdigitated elongated elements are electrically coupled for receiving a second bias voltage. By applying a appropriate first and second biasing voltages, all the reflective surfaces can be maintained in a first plane. When all the elongated elements are in the first plane, the diffraction grating light valve reflects the beam of light. A predetermined group of the elongated elements, preferably alternate ones, are deformable to be substantially coplanar in a second plane which is parallel to the first plane. When the predetermined group of elements is in the second plane, the diffraction grating light valve diffracts the beam of light.
Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method of and an apparatus for modulation of a beam of light. More particularly, this invention is for a substantially flat reflective surface having selectively deformable portions for providing a diffraction grating.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Designers and inventors have sought to develop a light modulator which can operate alone or together with other modulators. Such modulators should provide high resolution, high operating speeds (KHz frame rates), multiple gray scale levels, eg., 100 levels or be compatible with the generation of color, a high contrast ratio or modulation depth, have optical flatness, be compatible with VLSI processing techniques, be easy to handle and be relatively low in cost. In attempting to develop just such a system, one of the present inventors co-invented the method and apparatus of U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,360 which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
According to the teachings of the '360 patent, a diffraction grating is formed of a multiple mirrored-ribbon structure such as shown in FIG. 1. A pattern of a plurality of deformable ribbon structures 100 are formed in a spaced relationship over a substrate 102. Both the ribbons and the substrate between the ribbons are coated with a light reflective material 104 such as an aluminum film. The height difference that is designed between the surface of the reflective material 104 on the ribbons 100 and those on the substrate 102 is .lambda./2 when the ribbons are in a relaxed, up state. If light at a wavelength .lambda. impinges on this structure perpendicularly to the surface of the substrate 102, the reflected light from the surface of the ribbons 100 will be in phase with the reflected light from the substrate 102. This is because the light which strikes the substrate travels .lambda./2 further than the light striking the ribbons and then returns .lambda./2, for a total of one complete wavelength .lambda.. Thus, the structure appears as a flat mirror when a beam of light having a wavelength of .lambda. impinges thereon.
By applying appropriate voltages to the ribbons 100 and the substrate 102, the ribbons 100 can be made to bend toward and contact the substrate 102 as shown in FIG. 2. The thickness of the ribbons is designed to be .lambda./4. If light at a wavelength .lambda. impinges on this structure perpendicularly to the surface of the substrate 102, the reflected light from the surface of the ribbons 100 will be completely out of phase with the reflected light from the substrate 102. This will cause interference between the light from the ribbons and light from the substrate and thus, the structure will diffract the light. Because of the diffraction, the reflected light will come from the surface of the structure at an angle .THETA. from perpendicular.
In formulating a display device, one very important criteria is the contrast ratio between a dark pixel and a lighted pixel. The best way to provide a relatively large contrast ratio is to ensure that a dark pixel has no light. One technique for forming a display device using the structure described above, is to have a source of light configured to provide light with a wavelength .lambda. which impinges the surface of the structure from the perpendicular. A light collection device, e.g., optical lenses, can be positioned to collect light at the angle .THETA.. If the ribbons for one pixel are in the up position, all the light will be reflected back to the source and the collection device will receive none of the light. That pixel will appear black. If the ribbons for the pixel are in the down position, the light will be diffracted to the collection device and the pixel will appear bright.
If a wavelength of other than .lambda. impinges thereon, there will only be partial reflectivity when the ribbons are in the up state. Similarly, the light will only be partially diffracted to the angle .THETA. when the ribbons are in the down state. Thus, the so-called dark pixel will display some light and the so-called bright pixel will not display all the light if the wavelength of the light is not exactly at .lambda.. It is very expensive to utilize a light source that has only a single wavelength. Commercially viable light sources typically provide light over a range of wavelengths. Because single wavelength light is impractical to provide, the contrast ratio available from a real-world display device that relies on the above principles is much poorer than theoretically possible.
Assume for the sake of argument that single wavelength light were available and commercially viable. For the above described device to function in a way that provides an acceptable contrast ratio requires the heights and thickness of the ribbons and reflecting layers to provide structures that are precisely .lambda./2 when up and .lambda./4 when down. Because of variances in manufacturing processing, the contrast ratios between any two devices can vary dramatically. Because the likelihood is small that the relative heights will be precisely .lambda./2 when up and .lambda./4 when down, the contrast ratio will be much poorer than theoretically possible.
Another difficulty with the above described structure results from an artifact of the physical construction. In particular, the inventors have discovered that once in the down position, the ribbons tend to adhere to the substrate. The inventors have learned that texturing the surface of the substrate aids in overcoming this adhesion. Unfortunately, the textured surface substantially degrades the reflective properties of the surface. This degrades the performance of the light valve.
Finally, to achieve color using the above structure, the inventors of the '360 patent envisioned using three distinct valve structures having distinct periodicity of spacings between the ribbons. This structure thereby requires a larger number of ribbons to achieve color. Further, a light source that includes red, green and blue components impinges on these structures to diffract the light to the desired receptors. Accordingly, the intensity of the light is reduced for color.
The '360 patent teaches an alternate structure as shown in FIG. 3. According to this prior art structure, a plurality of elongated elements are disposed over a substrate 200. A first plurality of the elongated elements 202 are suspended by their respective ends (not shown) over an air gap 204 as in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2. A second plurality of the elongated elements 206 are mounted to the substrate 200 via a rigid support member 208. The height of the support members 208 is designed to be .lambda./4. A reflective material 210 is formed over the surface of all the elongated elements 202 and 206.
In theory, the elongated elements 202 and 206 are designed to be at the same height when at rest. Thus, when all the elongated elements are up and at the same height there will be no diffraction. (In fact there may be some modest amount of diffraction due to the periodic discontinuities of the gaps between elongated elements. However, this period is half the period of the grating so that it diffracts at twice the angle of the desired diffracted light. Because the optics are configured to pick up diffracted light from only the desired angle, this unwanted diffraction is not captured and does not degrade the contrast ratio.) Indeed, there will be no dependence upon the wavelength of the impinging light for forming a dark pixel if the elongated elements are at the same height.
In order build a structure such as shown in FIG. 3, a layer must be formed of a first material having a predetermined susceptibility to a known etchant. Portions of that layer are removed through known techniques such as photolithography and etching. A second material is then formed in the voids of the removed material such as by deposition. This second material has a known susceptibility to the etchant which is different than the first material. The layer is formed of the elongated element material. This structure is etched to form ribbons of the elongated elements. Finally, the second material is removed by etching to form the suspended elongated elements 202. It is difficult to consistently manufacture the device such that the first material and the second material are coplanar. Thus, the two sets of elongated elements are not likely to be perfectly coplanar. Further, most conventional techniques for forming the selectively removable layers of the first and second materials will provide a support member 208 that will swell (or shrink) during processing. This will further exacerbate the problem because such discontinuities will be at precisely the same period as the desired grating and as such the optics will capture this unwanted diffracted light.
Though there are no drawings, the '360 patent suggests that structure can be built with all the elements suspended. The '360 patent teaches that this is an advantage for controlling amplitude and phase. Unfortunately, there is no teaching as to addressing, biasing or structure to such devices.
What is needed is a flat diffraction grating system that positively maintains a planar relationship between adjacent elongated elements. Further, a system is desired that does not rely upon a predetermined wavelength of light. Additionally, a system is needed that does not required precise manufacturing process tolerances to support predetermined light wavelengths.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A diffraction grating light valve modulates an incident beam of light. A plurality of elongated elements each have a reflective surface. The elongated elements are suspended with their respective ends substantially coplanar. Alternate ones of the elongated elements are electrically coupled for receiving a first bias voltage. The other elongated elements are electrically coupled for receiving a second bias voltage. By applying an appropriate biasing voltage, all the reflective surfaces can be maintained in a predetermined plane. It will be understood that in fact, the reflective surfaces are not precisely within a single plane due to the fact that a modest sag is induced along the elongated element. Nevertheless, all corresponding points along adjacent elongated elements will be biased to an essentially identical height which effectively prevents diffraction. When all the elongated elements are in the first plane, the diffraction grating light valve reflects the beam of light. A predetermined group of the elongated elements, preferably alternate ones, are deformable to be substantially coplanar in a second plane which is parallel to the first plane. When the predetermined group of elements is in the second plane, the diffraction grating light valve diffracts the beam of light.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a cross section view of a prior art diffraction grating light valve wherein ribbon elements are in an up position.
FIG. 2 shows a cross section view of the prior art diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 1 wherein the ribbon elements are in a down position.
FIG. 3 shows a cross section view of an alternate embodiment prior art diffraction grating light valve having a plurality of planarly arrayed elongated elements, a portion of which are supported by support members.
FIG. 4 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve in the non-diffracting/up mode according to the preferred embodiment.
FIG. 5 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 in the diffracting/down mode according to the preferred embodiment.
FIG. 6 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 taken through 90.degree. and across two pixels.
FIG. 7 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 5 taken through 90.degree. and across two pixels.
FIG. 8 shows a plan view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 and adjacent pixels.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the intensity of light from one of the elongated elements of FIG. 4 relative to a voltage applied between the elongated element and the substrate in the case where no bias voltage is applied.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 4 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve in the non-diffracting/up mode according to the preferred embodiment. The details of a manufacturing process are disclosed in a co-owned, co-filed, co-pending U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 08/480,459, entitled A METHOD OF MAKING AND AN APPARATUS FOR A FLAT DIFFRACTION GRATING LIGHT VALVE, and filed concurrently on Jun. 7, 1995 by at least one of the same inventors. Only representative materials are disclosed herein and are not deemed to be in any way limiting.
A substrate 300 is provided and can be any convenient material such as a grown silicon. A passivating layer 302 such as silicon nitride Si.sub.3 N.sub.4 is formed over the substrate. Next, a conducting layer 304 is formed over the passivating layer 302. Preferably the conducting layer 304 is formed of a material that is resistant to subsequent processing steps, for example tungsten or a tungsten alloy.
A suspended element is formed next and includes layers collectively known as a ribbon 318. The suspended element includes a ribbon layer 306 formed above and spaced from the conducting layer 304. The ribbon layer 306 material is preferably silicon nitride. A reflecting layer 308 is formed on the ribbon layer 306 and is preferably formed of aluminum. Finally, a thin protection layer 310 is formed over the reflecting layer 308 an is preferably a PECVD oxide. An air gap 312 is left between the conducting layer 304 and the ribbon layer 306.
In this up state, because the elongated elements can be driven by appropriate voltages to be precisely the same height, incident light is not diffracted. This provides a true dark pixel when the elongated elements are coplanar. This provides the distinct advantage that the dark state of the pixels is wavelength independent. Recall that there will be a modest amount of diffraction due to the periodic nature of the gaps between adjacent elongated elements. However, the period of this diffraction is half that of the diffraction grating and thus can be eliminated optically.
FIG. 5 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 in the diffracting/down mode according to the preferred embodiment. The same reference numerals will be used where appropriate to identify the same structures when shown in different drawings to avoid confusion. By applying appropriate voltages between predetermined ones of the suspended elements and the conducting layer, electrostatic attractive forces cause those predetermined suspended elements to deform and contact the conducting layer 304. In FIG. 5, the two of the four suspended elements are shown in the down position. This causes diffraction of light reflected from adjacent elements.
Here there is only a modest wavelength dependence for the diffraction grating light valve. It is preferable that the distance between the heights of the adjacent elongated elements is .lambda./4. However, if the throw is optimized for green light, the losses due to changing the wavelength to red or blue is on the order of 5%. This is partly due to the fact that the intensity of collected light varies as a sine-squared function of the wavelength. Thus, small changes in wavelength will only have small changes in received intensity. Additionally, the ability to make a device that moves .lambda./4 is easier than in the prior art. There, the .lambda./4 difference comprises a combination of the spacer thickness and the elongated element thickness. This required very tight manufacturing tolerances for two layers. Here, the thickness of the air gap determines the wavelength conformance of the design; the elongated element can be any thickness. The air gap is preferably formed by removing a sacrificial oxide. Because oxide formation is well characterized under many easily controllable conditions, it is a routine matter to manufacture spacers of the correct dimension. It will be understood that the thickness of the air gap will be adjusted and controlled by the application of voltages to the ribbon or underlying conductor during normal operation of the device.
It is also possible to include a light sensor in an apparatus incorporating the diffraction grating light valve of the present invention. The sensor measures the diffracted light and adjusts the bias voltage (described below) in to maximize the sensed diffracted light. In this way the sensor and bias voltage adjusting circuit can drive the elongated elements that are still in the up position to maintain a precise .lambda./4 relationship even though the wavelength of the light source is changed.
Because the losses for such modest wavelength changes are small there will only be a small impact on the contrast ratio because in the dark state, the optical system collects essentially zero light. In an ideal system, where 100% of the light is collected in the on state and zero light is collected in the off state the contrast ratio is .infin. (indeed, any number divided by zero is .infin.). Even modest degradation in the dark state dramatically effects the contrast ratio. For example, if only 5% of unwanted light is collected in the dark state while still 100% of the light is collected in the on state reduces the contrast ratio from .infin. to about 20. If on the other hand, the dark state continues to collect zero light but the on state collects 95%, the contrast ratio continues to be .infin.. Note that the intensity of the display degrades in this example but the contrast ratio remains good.
Because of the relative wavelength independence of the diffraction grating light valve of the present invention, it is possible to build a system that utilizes a single structure to formulate color images. For example, three light sources, including red green and blue, can illuminate a pixel of interest. To formulate red, only the red source is activated. The same is true for green or blue. To make other colors, the pixel can be time multiplexed with the light sources. In other words, first the red source is illuminated and the pixels diffract or not as desired, then the blue and finally the green. The order of illumination is not important. The viewer's eye integrates the colors of the display to perceive the desired color.
FIG. 6 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 in the non-diffracting/up mode taken through 90.degree. and across two pixels. FIG. 6 only shows schematically the approximate geometries of the various structures. The various shapes and bending angles can change with process variations, selection of materials, thickness of layers and environmental conditions. A pixel 314 is formed along the suspended region and between anchorages 316. The pixels 314 are suspended to allow for deformation to provide selective diffraction as discussed herein. The anchorages allow separation between pixels 314 and also provide a mechanical support on the substrate 300 for the pixel structure.
FIG. 7 shows a cross section view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 5 in the diffracting/down mode taken through 90.degree. and across two pixels. By applying an appropriate voltage potential between the conducting layer 304 and the reflecting layer 308, an electrostatic attractive force bends the pixel into contact with the substrate. It will be appreciated that the conducting layer 304 extends into and out of the page and passes under many pixels. Similarly, the ribbon 318 from which the pixel is formed passes beyond both borders of the drawing and cross over many conducting layers. This interrelatedness between the pixel ribbons and the conducting layers provides for a unique addressing technique which will be described in more detail in reference to the drawing of FIGS. 8 and 9.
FIG. 8 shows a plan view of the diffraction grating light valve of FIG. 4 and adjacent pixels. Six pixels 320 are shown in the drawing of FIG. 8. It will be appreciated that this limited number of pixels is schematic only. A diffraction grating light valve according to the present invention for a commercially viable display will include at least the number of pixels presently available with other types of display technologies. Thus, for a commercial diffraction grating light valve there will be many more than two conducting layers 304 and many more ribbons 318 than are shown. For example, one commercially available display includes 1024 rows and 1280 columns of pixels. In addition to the pixels, I/O port bonding pads 326 for coupling electric signals to the ribbons 318 are also shown.
Each pixel 320 includes four adjacent ribbons 318. One set 322 of alternating ribbons 318 are coupled to a biasing bus 324. Indeed, two alternating ribbons for each one of the pixels are coupled to the biasing bus 324. The other two ribbons in the pixel 320 are coupled to receive a control voltage from the bond pad 326A. Preferably the biasing bus 324 is formed at the same time as the conducting layer 304.
The angle the light is deflected is determined by the width of the ribbons 318 and the spacing between adjacent ribbons. Because alternate ribbons are toggled in the preferred embodiment, the period is defined by two adjacent ribbons. In the preferred embodiment, the ribbons are 3.5 microns wide and the space between adjacent ribbons is 1.5 microns. Thus, the period of the structure is 10 microns. It will be appreciated that the space between the ribbons causes light to be lost. It is preferable that the space be minimized relative to the width of the ribbons.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the intensity of light from a display structure of two pairs of elongated elements of FIG. 4 relative to a voltage applied between an elongated element and the substrate in the case where alternate lines are not biased. The elongated elements exhibit a hysteresis. The elongated element begins to bend slightly as the voltage is increased as exhibited by an increase in light intensity. At a bend threshold V.sub.D, the elongated element snaps down into contact with the conductive layer. The voltage can then be reduced below that level and the elongated element will remain in the down position. At some lower voltage V.sub.U, the elongated element will relax and return to the up position.
The voltage V.sub.D necessary to cause an elongated element to snap into the down position is in the range of 20 volts DC. Depending upon the manufacturing processes, materials and layer thicknesses used to build such devices it is possible that this voltage could range significantly above and below that value. In the preferred embodiment, the elongated elements are biased at a midrange voltage V.sub.B between the bend voltage V.sub.D and the lower voltage V.sub.U. In this way, a considerably smaller voltage excursion is required to cause an elongated element to snap or relax.
It is apparent from studying the graph of FIG. 9 that the bias voltage V.sub.B will cause some modest flexing of the elongated elements. Consider the voltages necessary to switch the pixel 320. For this discussion, reference will be made to both FIGS. 8 and 9. In one addressing scheme, the bias voltage V.sub.B is applied to all the ribbons of the pixel by applying V.sub.B to the bond pad 326A and to the conductor 324. All the ribbons in the pixel 320 will flex slightly and remain planar so that the dark state remains dark. In the preferred embodiment, every other ribbon is permanently coupled to the bias voltage V.sub.B. The voltage on the respective interdigitated ribbons is changed up or down to cause those ribbons to snap down or relax up.
The incremental voltage necessary to switch the ribbon is .DELTA.V.sub.S as shown in FIG. 9. If at least .DELTA.V.sub.S were added to the voltage applied to the bond pad 326A, all the pixels in the row connected to that bond pad would toggle down to the diffracting state. Alternatively, if .DELTA.V.sub.S were subtracted from the voltage applied to the conducting layer 328 (also labeled 304 to show the correspondence to FIGS. 4-7), all the ribbons of all the pixels in column above this conducting layer would also toggle down. Under these conditions, the ribbons would all be in the down state so that these pixels would remain dark. To provide addressing of the pixel 320, the voltage .DELTA.V.sub.S /2 is added to the bond pad 326A and the voltage .DELTA.V.sub.S /2 is subtracted from the conducting layer 328. Any other voltage combination can be used so long as neither voltage alone will cause the ribbons to toggle down but the combination of both do cause the ribbons to toggle down.
Once the +.DELTA.V.sub.S /2 and -.DELTA.V.sub.S /2 are removed, the ribbons that were toggled into the down position will remain down due to the inherent hysteresis of the ribbons until .DELTA.V.sub.S of the opposite polarity is applied across the same elements. To avoid erasing an entire row or column at once, a single pixel 320 can be erased by appropriately applying .+-..DELTA.V.sub.S /2 to the row and column with the opposite polarity used to toggle the pixel 320 down. As described above, other combinations of voltages can be used to erase a pixel 320.
In the preferred embodiment, a row of data is set up and then toggled into the row. If the conducting layers 304 comprise the columns, the data is placed onto the columns by appropriately coupling -.DELTA.V.sub.S /2 to all the columns wherein the pixels are desired to be bright. Even though all the ribbons for all the pixels in each such columns will move slightly as a result of this change in voltage, there will be no change in the image displayed because these ribbons remain coplanar. Thus, the ribbons move common mode so there is common mode rejection of any such changes. In other words, because the electrostatic attractive force is equally applied to all the elongated elements in a row those ribbons move together and unwanted diffraction is prevented. It will be understood that in fact, the reflective surfaces are not precisely within a single plane due to the fact that a modest sag is induced along the elongated element. Nevertheless, all corresponding points along adjacent elongated elements will be biased to an essentially identical height which effectively prevents diffraction. The voltage on the bond pads coupled to ribbons that move in the desired row is then raised from V.sub.B to (V.sub.B +.DELTA.V.sub.S /2) and all the appropriate pixels will be toggled. If on the other hand, the data were set up on the ribbons and then toggled in with the underlying conducting layer, the display would twinkle in response to the .DELTA.V.sub.S /2 being selectively applied to predetermined ones of the ribbons.
The present invention has been described relative to a preferred embodiment. Improvements or modifications that become apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art only after reading this disclosure are deemed within the spirit and scope of the application.
Claims
  • 1. A modulator for modulating an incident beam of light comprising:
  • a. a plurality of elongated elements, each element having a first end and a second end and a light reflective planar surface, wherein the elements are grouped into a first group and a second group such that the elements of the first group are interdigitated with the elements of the second group, the elements being arranged parallel to each other;
  • b. means for suspending the elements of the first group and the second group by their ends;
  • c. means for electrically coupling all the elongated elements of the first group in each row together;
  • d. means for electrically coupling all the elongated elements of the second group in each row together;
  • e. means for applying a first bias voltage to the first group and means for applying a second bias voltage to the second group such that the reflective surfaces are substantially coplanar and in a first plane such that the incident beam of light is reflected; and
  • f. means for selectively deflecting the elements of the first group perpendicular to the first plane toward a second plane which is parallel to the first plane such that the incident beam of light is diffracted.
  • 2. The modulator according to claim 1 further comprising means for adjusting a position of the second group perpendicular to the first plane, independently of the first group.
  • 3. The modulator according to claim 1 wherein adjacent elements are spaced from one another by a gap such that the extent of each reflective surface is larger than each gap.
  • 4. The modulator according to claim 1 wherein the second plane is approximately .lambda./4 from the first plane, where .lambda. is the wavelength of the bean of light.
  • 5. The modulator according to claim 1 wherein the elements do not lie in the first plane when the first bias voltage is removed.
  • 6. The modulator according to claim 1 wherein an electrostatic attraction is formed by applying the first bias voltage and the second bias voltage as an electrical potential across the elements and an underlying conductor.
  • 7. The modulator according to claim 1 further comprising a means for sensing a diffracted light and for automatically adjusting the electrical bias in response thereto.
  • 8. The modulator according to claim 1 wherein the elements reflect light when in the second plane regardless of wavelength.
  • 9. A digital display system for displaying an image comprising:
  • a. a plurality of pixels, each pixel for displaying a portion of the image, wherein the pixels are arranged in an array having a plurality of rows and plurality of columns, and further wherein each pixel comprises:
  • (1) a plurality of elongated elements, each element having a first end and a second end and a light reflective planar surface, wherein the elements are grouped into a first group and a second group such that the elements of the first group are interdigitated with the elements of the second group, the elements being arranged parallel to each other; and
  • (2) means for suspending the elements of the first group and the second group over a substrate by their ends;
  • b. means for electrically coupling all the elongated elements of the first group in each row together;
  • c. means for electrically coupling all the elongated elements of the second group in each row together;
  • d. means for applying a first bias voltage to the first group and means for applying a second bias voltage to the second group such that the reflective surfaces are substantially coplanar and in a first plane such that the incident beam of light is reflected; and
  • e. means for selectively deflecting the elements of the first group perpendicular to the plane to a second plane which is parallel to the first plane such that the incident beam of light is diffracted.
  • 10. The apparatus according to claim 9 wherein the means for selectively deflecting the elements of the first group comprises a conductive layer mounted to the substrate and under all the elongated elements in a column.
US Referenced Citations (307)
Number Name Date Kind
RE16767 Jenkins Oct 1927
1525550 Jenkins Feb 1925
1548262 Freedman Aug 1925
1814701 Ives Jul 1931
2415226 Sziklai Feb 1947
2783406 Vanderhooft Feb 1957
2991690 Grey et al. Jul 1961
3553364 Lee Jan 1971
3576394 Lee Apr 1971
3600798 Lee Aug 1971
3656837 Sandbank Apr 1972
3802796 Rotz et al. Apr 1974
3886310 Guldberg et al. May 1975
3896338 Nathanson et al. Jul 1975
3935499 Oess Jan 1976
3935500 Oess et al. Jan 1976
3947105 Smith Mar 1976
3969611 Fonteneau Jul 1976
4001663 Bray Jan 1977
4009939 Okano Mar 1977
4012116 Yevick Mar 1977
4017158 Booth Apr 1977
4020381 Oess et al. Apr 1977
4067129 Abramson et al. Jan 1978
4084437 Finnegan Apr 1978
4093346 Nishino et al. Jun 1978
4093921 Buss Jun 1978
4093922 Buss Jun 1978
4127322 Jacobson et al. Nov 1978
4135502 Peck Jan 1979
4139257 Matsumoto Feb 1979
4163570 Greenaway Aug 1979
4184700 Greenaway Jan 1980
4211918 Nyfeler et al. Jul 1980
4223050 Nyfeler et al. Sep 1980
4225913 Bray Sep 1980
4250217 Greenaway Feb 1981
4250393 Greenaway Feb 1981
4327411 Turner Apr 1982
4327966 Bloom May 1982
4338660 Kelley et al. Jul 1982
4408884 Kleinknecht et al. Oct 1983
4418397 Brantingham et al. Nov 1983
4420717 Wallace et al. Dec 1983
4430584 Someshwar et al. Feb 1984
4440839 Mottier Apr 1984
4443819 Funada et al. Apr 1984
4443845 Hamilton et al. Apr 1984
4447881 Brantingham et al. May 1984
4454591 Lou Jun 1984
4468725 Venturii Aug 1984
4484188 Ott Nov 1984
4492435 Banton et al. Jan 1985
4503494 Hamilton et al. Mar 1985
4556378 Nyfeler et al. Dec 1985
4561044 Ogura et al. Dec 1985
4566935 Hornbeck Jan 1986
4571041 Gaudyn Feb 1986
4571603 Hornbeck et al. Feb 1986
4590548 Maytum May 1986
4594501 Culley et al. Jun 1986
4596992 Hornbeck Jun 1986
4615595 Hornbeck Oct 1986
4623219 Trias Nov 1986
4645881 LeToumelin et al. Feb 1987
4646158 Ohno et al. Feb 1987
4652932 Miyajima et al. Mar 1987
4655539 Caulfield et al. Apr 1987
4662746 Hornbeck May 1987
4663670 Ito et al. May 1987
4710732 Hornbeck Dec 1987
4714326 Usui et al. Dec 1987
4719507 Bos Jan 1988
4722593 Shimazaki Feb 1988
4728185 Thomas Mar 1988
4744633 Sheiman May 1988
4751509 Kubota et al. Jun 1988
4761253 Antes Aug 1988
4772094 Sheiman Sep 1988
4803560 Matsunaga et al. Feb 1989
4807965 Garakani Feb 1989
4809078 Yabe et al. Feb 1989
4811210 McAulay Mar 1989
4814759 Gombrich et al. Mar 1989
4827391 Sills May 1989
4829365 Eichenlaub May 1989
4856863 Sampsell et al. Aug 1989
4856869 Sakata et al. Aug 1989
4859012 Cohn Aug 1989
4866488 Frensley Sep 1989
4915463 Barbee, Jr. Apr 1990
4915479 Clarke Apr 1990
4952925 Haastert Aug 1990
4954789 Sampsell Sep 1990
4956619 Hornbeck Sep 1990
4978202 Yang Dec 1990
4982184 Kirkwood Jan 1991
4984824 Antes et al. Jan 1991
5018256 Hornbeck May 1991
5022750 Flasck Jun 1991
5024494 Williams et al. Jun 1991
5028939 Hornbeck et al. Jul 1991
5035473 Kuwayama et al. Jul 1991
5037173 Sampsell et al. Aug 1991
5041851 Nelson Aug 1991
5058992 Takahashi Oct 1991
5060058 Goldenberg et al. Oct 1991
5061049 Hornbeck Oct 1991
5072239 Mitcham et al. Dec 1991
5072418 Boutaud et al. Dec 1991
5079544 DeMond et al. Jan 1992
5083857 Hornbeck Jan 1992
5089903 Kuwayama et al. Feb 1992
5096279 Hornbeck et al. Mar 1992
5099353 Hornbeck Mar 1992
5101184 Antes Mar 1992
5101236 Nelson et al. Mar 1992
5105207 Nelson Apr 1992
5105299 Anderson et al. Apr 1992
5105369 Nelson Apr 1992
5113285 Franklin et al. May 1992
5119204 Hashimoto et al. Jun 1992
5121343 Faris Jun 1992
5128660 DeMond et al. Jul 1992
5129716 Holakovsky et al. Jul 1992
5132812 Takahashi et al. Jul 1992
5142303 Nelson Aug 1992
5142405 Hornbeck Aug 1992
5142677 Ehlig et al. Aug 1992
5148157 Florence Sep 1992
5148506 McDonald Sep 1992
5151718 Nelson Sep 1992
5155604 Miekka et al. Oct 1992
5155778 Magel et al. Oct 1992
5155812 Ehlig et al. Oct 1992
5159485 Nelson Oct 1992
5161042 Hamada Nov 1992
5162787 Thompson et al. Nov 1992
5165013 Faris Nov 1992
5168406 Nelson Dec 1992
5170156 DeMond et al. Dec 1992
5170269 Lin et al. Dec 1992
5170283 O'Brien et al. Dec 1992
5172161 Nelson Dec 1992
5172262 Hornbeck Dec 1992
5178728 Boysel et al. Jan 1993
5179274 Sampsell Jan 1993
5179367 Shimizu Jan 1993
5181231 Parikh et al. Jan 1993
5192946 Thompson et al. Mar 1993
5202785 Nelson Apr 1993
5206629 DeMond et al. Apr 1993
5212555 Stoltz May 1993
5212582 Nelson May 1993
5214419 DeMond et al. May 1993
5214420 Thompson et al. May 1993
5216537 Hornbeck Jun 1993
5221982 Faris Jun 1993
5226099 Mignardi et al. Jul 1993
5231363 Sano et al. Jul 1993
5231388 Stoltz Jul 1993
5233456 Nelson Aug 1993
5237340 Nelson Aug 1993
5237435 Kurematsu et al. Aug 1993
5240818 Mignardi et al. Aug 1993
5245686 Faris et al. Sep 1993
5247180 Mitcham et al. Sep 1993
5247593 Lin et al. Sep 1993
5254980 Hendrix et al. Oct 1993
5255100 Urbanus Oct 1993
5256869 Lin et al Oct 1993
5262000 Wellbourn et al. Nov 1993
5272473 Thompson et al. Dec 1993
5278652 Urbanus et al. Jan 1994
5278925 Boysel et al. Jan 1994
5280277 Hornbeck Jan 1994
5281957 Schoolman Jan 1994
5285196 Gale, Jr. Feb 1994
5285407 Gale et al. Feb 1994
5287096 Thompson et al. Feb 1994
5287215 Warde et al. Feb 1994
5289172 Gale, Jr. et al. Feb 1994
5291317 Newswanger Mar 1994
5291473 Pauli Mar 1994
5293511 Poradish et al. Mar 1994
5296950 Lin et al. Mar 1994
5299037 Sakata Mar 1994
5301062 Takahashi et al. Apr 1994
5303055 Hendrix et al. Apr 1994
5307056 Urbanus Apr 1994
5307185 Jones et al. Apr 1994
5311349 Anderson et al. May 1994
5311360 Bloom et al. May 1994
5312513 Florence et al. May 1994
5313479 Florence May 1994
5313648 Ehlig et al. May 1994
5315418 Sprague et al. May 1994
5319214 Gregory et al. Jun 1994
5319789 Ehlig et al. Jun 1994
5319792 Ehlig et al. Jun 1994
5323002 Sampsell et al. Jun 1994
5325116 Sampsell Jun 1994
5327286 Sampsell et al. Jul 1994
5330878 Nelson Jul 1994
5331454 Hornbeck Jul 1994
5339116 Urbanus et al. Aug 1994
5345521 McDonald et al. Sep 1994
5347321 Gove Sep 1994
5347433 Sedlmayr Sep 1994
5348619 Bohannon et al. Sep 1994
5349687 Ehlig et al. Sep 1994
5351052 D'Hout et al. Sep 1994
5357369 Pilling et al. Oct 1994
5359349 Jambor et al. Oct 1994
5363220 Kuwayama et al. Nov 1994
5365283 Doherty et al. Nov 1994
5367585 Ghezzo et al. Nov 1994
5371543 Anderson Dec 1994
5382961 Gale, Jr. Jan 1995
5387924 Gale, Jr. et al. Feb 1995
5389182 Mignardi Feb 1995
5392140 Ezra et al. Feb 1995
5392151 Nelson Feb 1995
5398071 Gove et al. Mar 1995
5410315 Huber Apr 1995
5411769 Hornbeck May 1995
5412186 Gale May 1995
5418584 Larson May 1995
5420655 Shimizu May 1995
5430524 Nelson Jul 1995
5435876 Alfaro et al. Jul 1995
5442411 Urbanus et al. Aug 1995
5442414 Janssen et al. Aug 1995
5444566 Gale et al. Aug 1995
5445559 Gale et al. Aug 1995
5446479 Thompson et al. Aug 1995
5447600 Webb Sep 1995
5448314 Heimbuch et al. Sep 1995
5448546 Pauli Sep 1995
5450088 Meier et al. Sep 1995
5450219 Gold et al. Sep 1995
5451103 Hatanaka et al. Sep 1995
5452024 Sampsell Sep 1995
5452138 Mignardi et al. Sep 1995
5453747 D'Hont et al. Sep 1995
5453778 Venkateswar et al. Sep 1995
5453803 Shapiro et al. Sep 1995
5454906 Baker et al. Oct 1995
5455602 Tew Oct 1995
5457493 Leddy et al. Oct 1995
5457566 Sampsell et al. Oct 1995
5458716 Alfaro et al. Oct 1995
5459492 Venkateswar Oct 1995
5459528 Pettitt Oct 1995
5459592 Shibatani et al. Oct 1995
5459610 Bloom et al. Oct 1995
5461410 Venkateswar et al. Oct 1995
5461411 Florence et al. Oct 1995
5461547 Ciupke et al. Oct 1995
5463347 Jones et al. Oct 1995
5465175 Woodgate et al. Nov 1995
5467106 Salomon Nov 1995
5467138 Gove Nov 1995
5467146 Huang et al. Nov 1995
5469302 Lim Nov 1995
5481118 Tew Jan 1996
5482564 Douglas et al. Jan 1996
5482818 Nelson Jan 1996
5483307 Anderson Jan 1996
5485304 Kaeriyama Jan 1996
5485354 Ciupke et al. Jan 1996
5486698 Hanson et al. Jan 1996
5486841 Hara et al. Jan 1996
5488431 Gove et al. Jan 1996
5489952 Gove et al. Feb 1996
5490009 Venkateswar et al. Feb 1996
5491510 Gove Feb 1996
5491715 Flaxl Feb 1996
5497172 Doherty et al. Mar 1996
5497197 Gove et al. Mar 1996
5497262 Kaeriyama Mar 1996
5499060 Gove et al. Mar 1996
5499062 Urbanus Mar 1996
5500761 Goossen et al. Mar 1996
5502481 Dentinger et al. Mar 1996
5504504 Markandey et al. Apr 1996
5504514 Nelson Apr 1996
5504575 Stafford Apr 1996
5504614 Webb et al. Apr 1996
5506171 Leonard et al. Apr 1996
5506597 Thompson et al. Apr 1996
5506720 Yoon Apr 1996
5508750 Hewlett et al. Apr 1996
5508840 Vogel et al. Apr 1996
5508841 Lin et al. Apr 1996
5510824 Nelson Apr 1996
5512374 Wallace et al. Apr 1996
5512748 Hanson Apr 1996
5515076 Thompson et al. May 1996
5516125 McKenna May 1996
5517340 Doany et al. May 1996
5517347 Sampsell May 1996
5519450 Urbanus et al. May 1996
5523803 Urbanus et al. Jun 1996
5523878 Wallace et al. Jun 1996
5523881 Florence et al. Jun 1996
5524155 Weaver Jun 1996
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 417 039 A1 Mar 1991 EPX