The present disclosure relates to a flat key for a locking cylinder, in particular of locking systems, with substantially flat and approximately parallel flat sides, a key rear section and a key front section opposite thereto, toothed on the end face, for positioning tumbler pins divided into core pins and housing pins, which are spring-loaded in corresponding key channels of cylinder cores against the key front section in the direction of the key rear section, with grooves in the form of profiled variation elements and profiled guiding elements being provided in the flat sides of the flat key, with at least two grooves of one flat side of the flat key overlapping and being undercut in opposite directions. It further relates to a blank suitable for producing such a flat key, a method for producing such a blank and a locking cylinder for such a flat key.
There should be a clear assignment between key and lock. For simple locks that are not part of a locking system, each key should only lock “its” assigned lock. With locking systems, however, the assignment is not clear, as there are hierarchies: for example, the entrance gate should usually be able to be locked with all keys, but a room can often only be locked with a single key. On the other hand, the cleaning staff should have a key that locks all locks so that they can clean all rooms. This assignment of keys and locks or the exclusion of certain keys from certain locks is achieved, among other things, by the cross-sectional profile of the keys and the cross-section of the key channels. The key will only fit into the lock if the contour of a key channel cross-section corresponds to or encloses a flat key cross-section. As soon as the contour of the flat key cross-section intersects that of the key channel cross-section, the key has no locking authorization with regard to the aforementioned locking cylinder.
Basically, such flat keys have a guide profile and a variation profile. The guide profile is always the same for a series of keys and is manufactured with very small tolerances so that the key is guided precisely in the key channel. The variation profile differs from key to key and is intended to prevent an unauthorized key from being introduced into a key channel. The tolerances can be larger here.
This assignment between key and locking cylinder via the profile applies to the individual cylinder and the individual key, which is not directly part of a locking system, as well as to locking systems.
A blank for a flat key only has the grooves of the guide profile; the variation profile and the serration of the key front section are subsequently milled into such a blank. As mentioned, the guide profile should only have very small tolerances, which is why it should not be milled on the copy milling machine, but rather a correspondingly precise, prefabricated blank should be used. The less precise copy milling machine should only be used for milling the serration of the key front section and the variation profile.
The need for security is met if a key cannot be easily copied. The authorized person can obtain a replacement key from the original manufacturer using security certificates and strict identity checks. If key blanks are commercially available, a locksmith with a copy milling device can easily produce a replacement key by creating a serration on the key front section. If a copy milling device is also able to scan a cross-sectional profile on the flat sides of an original key and appropriate milling tools are available, a replacement key can also be machined out of a metal plate. So if the production of replacement keys for blocked key profiles was previously not possible due to the lack of a corresponding blank due to the restriction of free access on the market, the technical possibilities for locksmiths have been available for a long time to produce copies of a key both in terms of the serration and in terms of the profile. The scanning of a key profile is done mechanically or optically from the side. The result of this lateral scanning is followed by the grooving or feeding of one or a plurality of milling cutters to produce U-shaped, V-shaped or rectangular grooves. By tilting the key blank, grooves can also be produced at an angle to the longitudinal center plane of the profile cross-section, for example as undercut grooves. As mentioned, such keys are inferior due to their lower precision, but they usually still lock.
A flat key of the type mentioned above is known from WO 2012/088562 A2. According to this document, two overlapping, oppositely undercut grooves were provided, with the center of the groove base, viewed in the direction normal to the longitudinal center plane of the key, being concealed by these undercuts in at least one groove. The idea behind it was this: If the groove base is at least partially concealed, it is particularly difficult to determine the exact data of the groove (depth, width, angle, position). The edge resulting from the intersection of the two grooves can be scanned in the locking cylinder. However, this edge cannot be created directly by the locksmith, but is created by the intersection of the two grooves. If the data of at least one groove cannot be accurately captured, this edge is not located in the intended position and the key will not lock.
There are now laser scanners, and using these it is easy to capture the exact contour even of undercut grooves such that such keys are now relatively easy to copy.
Complicated grooves can now be devised, as shown, for example, in FIG. 15 of US 2011/0056258 A1. The problem, however, is that such keys cannot be produced by milling; such profiles must be broached, and broaching is considerably more complex and therefore more expensive than milling. In addition, keys with such a profile must be considerably thicker than is currently common in Central Europe, i.e. considerably thicker than the maximum of 2.8 mm that is common in Central Europe.
The present disclosure improves a flat key of the type mentioned at the outset such that the cross-sectional profile cannot be completely captured even when using a laser scanner, with the key still being able to be produced by milling, i.e. relatively inexpensively, and it also being possible to implement the profile in a key of the conventional thickness of 2.8 mm.
This is achieved by providing a flat key of the type mentioned at the outset or by a blank for such a flat key according to the disclosure in that a depression is provided in the outer flank of at least one of the two grooves and that at least one region of the depression is not visible from the side. In order that a key copy cannot be inserted into the locking cylinder without such a depression, a locking cylinder according to the disclosure provides that an elevation is provided in the outer flank of at least one of the two ribs.
While at the priority date of WO 2012/088562 A2 it was still sufficient that the groove base of at least one groove was not visible when viewed in a direction normal to the longitudinal center plane, in order to make copying so complex that most locksmiths did not even attempt it, this is no longer sufficient due to the laser scanners that are readily available today. It is necessary that at least one point of the groove base is not visible at all from the side. Therefore, an additional depression is provided.
It is favorable if the two grooves including the depression(s) are already provided in the blank, i.e. are part of the guide profile, because then they have to be copied with high precision if it is desired to produce a problem-free locking key. As explained above, a guide profile has very small tolerances. If the key is now copied in such manner that the area around the grooves is simply milled away to make it larger, without paying attention to the exact contour, the key will no longer be guided precisely; it will “jam”. Such inferior keys reflect poorly on the locking cylinder or the entire locking system, and according to the highest court rulings, this represents unfair competition. For reasons of competition law, the guide profile must be copied exactly so as not to devalue the entire locking system.
In accordance with WO 2012/088562 A2, it is expedient if, in addition to the two oppositely undercut grooves, a further groove is provided on the opposite flat side, which overlaps with at least one of the two oppositely undercut grooves, with the two undercut grooves and the further groove preferably being arranged in the central region of the two flat sides. On the one hand, the overlap makes it more difficult to insert lock picking tools, and on the other hand, it causes the key to lose its mechanical stability if the guide profile is milled larger than intended by the key manufacturer. Apart from the fact that such a key gets stuck, it also bends easily and thus becomes completely unusable. In the associated locking cylinder, it is therefore provided that in addition to the two oppositely undercut ribs, a further rib is provided on the opposite flat side, which overlaps with at least one of the two oppositely undercut ribs, with the two undercut ribs and the further rib preferably being arranged in the central region of the two flat sides, where the head ends of the core pins lie. When the ribs are arranged in the central region, they cover the core pins in the key channel on the head side, making scanning with lock picking tools more difficult.
Such a flat key is particularly difficult to copy if the two undercut angles of the undercut grooves are different sizes. In this way, a conclusion cannot be drawn from one undercut groove to the other.
It is particularly favorable if a depression is provided in the outer flank of both grooves, with the two depressions preferably being symmetrical, with the axis of symmetry lying in the open area of the two overlapping grooves, in particular in such manner that they can be produced with a T-slot milling cutter.
In this embodiment, it is further provided that the two depressions are symmetrical to one another and the axis of symmetry (corresponding to the shaft of the T-slot milling cutter) lies in the open area of the two overlapping grooves.
Accordingly, the associated locking cylinder is provided with an elevation on the outer flank of both ribs, with the two elevations preferably being symmetrical.
It is thereby expedient that the axis of symmetry of the two depressions is at an oblique angle to the longitudinal center plane of the flat key or the blank. In this way, a conclusion cannot be drawn from one depression to the other. Accordingly, it is provided for the associated locking cylinder that the axis of symmetry is at an oblique angle to the longitudinal center plane of the key channel.
Lastly, it is favorable if the depression or depressions are designed like grooves with a round base. This makes it even more difficult to recognize the exact contour. The corresponding locking cylinder then has the elevation or elevations rounded on the outside.
In order to produce a key blank for such flat keys, it is expedient to first produce the two undercut grooves and then mill a depression into at least one of the two undercut grooves using a T-slot milling cutter. In this way, no broaching tools are necessary to produce the depression.
It is thereby particularly expedient to mill a depression simultaneously in each of the undercut grooves using the T-slot milling cutter. This not only saves a work step, but also reduces the radial forces on the T-slot milling cutter.
Lastly, it is expedient if the T-slot milling cutter is guided at an acute or obtuse angle to the longitudinal center plane of the blank. This creates an additional “degree of freedom” that must be determined when copying the key. If the T-slot milling cutter were positioned exactly at right angles to the longitudinal center plane of the blank, determining the geometry of the grooves would be easier.
The present disclosure is explained in more detail using the accompanying drawings, in which is shown:
The intersection of the two grooves 11′, 12′ results in an edge B which can be scanned with a tumbler pin. Thus, a key copy which, instead of the two grooves 11′, 12′, has a large rectangular groove enclosing both grooves 11′, 12′ does not lock, although it can be inserted into the key channel. Point A can also be scanned with a tumbler pin. This is known from the above-mentioned WO 2012/088562 A2, and these options are retained in the flat key according to the disclosure.
A further groove 13′ is provided on the opposite flat side 2′ on the left in
According to the disclosure, two additional depressions 15′ and 16′ are now provided in this blank 1b, which is known in principle, namely in the outer flanks 11a′ and 12a′ of the grooves 11′ and 12′. They can be milled with a T-slot milling cutter 60 (see
The theoretical lines of sight 15a and 16a are also shown in
A T-slot milling cutter with a relatively thin shaft (e.g. 1 mm) has a shorter tool life than a milling cutter 60 (see
A flat key 1 produced from such a blank (see
Furthermore, the flat keys 1 (see
An associated locking cylinder 100 can be seen in perspective view in
In
In
In particular, for all grooves of the guide profile of the flat key, corresponding ribs 11, 12, 13 and 14 (see
An advantage of these new keys 1 is that they can also be inserted into locking cylinders where the elevations 15, 16 are missing. That is to say that in the case of an existing locking system according to the prior art, it is sufficient to provide all existing flat keys with the additional depressions 15′, 16′ and, for example, to only equip the entrance doors with new locking cylinders, which have the elevations 15, 16 at the points corresponding to the depressions 15′, 16′ to prevent the new keys from being copied. The old flat keys or poor copies of the new flat keys cannot then be inserted into the key channel 103 of the new locking cylinders 100 of the entrance doors and are therefore worthless.
So-called tumbler pins are provided so that not just any flat key that fits into the key channel 103 (see
As can be further seen from
As can be seen from
If a suitable flat key 1 is now inserted (see
If even one serration cutout were too deep or not deep enough, the housing pin 111 or the core pin 112 would prevent rotation.
An exception is the second tumbler pin with the intermediate piece 115. As a result of the intermediate piece 115, flat keys with two different serrations lock in the case of the locking cylinder 100 represented here: if the second serration cutout is deeper by the height of the intermediate piece 115 than in the example represented, instead of the pitch plane between the core pin 112′ and the intermediate piece 115, the pitch plane between the intermediate piece 115 and housing pin 111′ comes to lie on the boundary between cylinder core 102 and housing 101, and this flat key also locks. This is used in locking systems where, for example, a locking cylinder is to be locked by a key that only matches this locking cylinder and by a master key. In more complicated locking systems, such intermediate pieces 115 can of course be provided for a plurality of tumbler pins or even for all tumbler pins.
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
GM50232/2021 | Nov 2021 | AU | national |
This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Stage patent application of PCT/EP2022/081619, filed on 11 Nov. 2022, which claims the benefit of Austrian patent application no. GM50232/2021, filed on 15 Nov. 2021, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2022/081619 | 11/11/2022 | WO |