The invention relates to a flat key profile for a lock and key system in which a key channel corresponding to the key profile is provided in the lock cylinder.
The term flat key is also understood to mean rib profile keys or locking rib profile keys, i.e., those profiles in which ribs protrude beyond the key side surface.
Keys are mimicked or copied for a variety of reasons, with a distinction being made between legal and illegal.
Copying is made more difficult by such key profiles or at least made more difficult by the fact that they are protected profiles, ie those which have been granted patent or utility model protection.
For such keys there is the possibility of reordering via the lock manufacturer or authorized locksmiths.
On the other hand, it is known that locksmiths are also able, through the use of copying machines, to produce duplicates having profiles protected on their own. However, there are profiles for which this is not so easy and therefore an approximation to the actual profile is attempted by simplifications. This includes, for example, the shape of the lateral profile grooves.
In commercial copying machines, namely, a thin circular saw blade is used, which can only make right-angled cuts in the key. If V-shaped cuts are required for the copy, only a rectangular cut can be made as a replacement.
The object of the invention is now to complicate the machine copying a key profile.
This object is achieved according to the invention by a flat key profile for a lock and key system, in which a key channel corresponding to the key profile is provided in the lock cylinder, thereby,
Preferably embodiments emerge from the subclaims.
Two opposing profile features are used, which are triangular (V-shaped). The profile features are symmetrical and have radii in their base.
If two opposing features are now arranged so that they are very close to each other with profiles milled right-angled, then the key would break in this area. The minimum overlap should be 0.2 mm and the maximum residual thickness 0.3 mm. In order to produce the triangular cuts (profile features) economically, the deeper notch should have an angle of a=110°.
There must be at least two incisions that are offset from each other. Starting from the deeper incision, either “above” or “below” this one further incision must be present.
Since, as mentioned above, the copying machine with a rectangular milling disc cannot produce a V-shaped profile groove, the profile groove must be milled rectangular as a replacement, whereby it is inevitably wider.
Since, however, according to the invention further arrangement relationships or features must be taken into account, this leads to the key shank becoming too thin at certain points, so that it breaks during the copying process or at the latest during use.
Thus, the disadvantage of mechanical profile copying machines is exploited, so that the copied key is not usable. Even copying with 3D filament printers is made much more difficult by the bevels, as here the bevels can only be generated stepwise.
The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to the drawings.
Showing:
The key shaft is labeled 1. From the key side surface, the deeper profile groove 2 goes out, which extends paracentrally over the median plane. The profile groove 2 is formed symmetrically and has the angle alpha (α). Likewise, the profile grooves are formed “over” and “under” the profile groove 2 on the other key side. These are marked 3 and 4 and have an angle beta (β). At the bottom of the incisions, there is a radius (R). To the three incisions each with dashed lines 5, 6, 7 is drawn a rectangle that represents the rectangular incisions by means of a mechanical profile copying machine.
In detail, the arrangement of the paracentric profile groove with respect to the opposite profile grooves is such that an imaginary line 7, perpendicular to the key plane from the intersection of the upper or lower leg of the paracentric profile groove with the key side surface to the opposite profile groove, to an imaginary line 5, which extends from the intersection of the upper or lower leg of the opposite profile groove with the key side surface to the paracentric profile groove, a vertical distance 9 has.
This results in horizontal and vertical distances. The horizontal distance 8 should be a maximum of 0.3 mm, the vertical coverage 9 minimum 0.2 mm. The angle alpha from the deeper incision should be 110°. The radius R should be 0.2 mm. The angle beta is freely selectable according to the distances 8 and 9. The incisions (profile features) should preferably lie in the “lower” area of the key, ie in which—starting from the key breast—is notched.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102018101438.4 | Jan 2018 | DE | national |
18197124 | Sep 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2019/100050 | 1/18/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/144990 | 8/1/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3499304 | Naujoks | Mar 1970 | A |
5797287 | Prunbauer | Aug 1998 | A |
5819567 | Eden, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
6851292 | Kruhn | Feb 2005 | B2 |
8931316 | Reine | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20040253067 | Bosch | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070295045 | Neumayer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3614222 | Jun 1987 | DE |
9302740 | Apr 1993 | DE |
4304604 | Aug 1994 | DE |
1217151 | Jun 2002 | EP |
03004806 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report PCT/DE2019/100050, dated May 21, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200354987 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |