The present invention relates to a flat panel display having multiple, and independent, display areas integrated on one glass backplane. The flat panel display of the present invention provides a continguous, large image, or independent video scenes. In addition to the features mentioned above, objects and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent upon a reading of the following description.
In one embodiment, the flat panel display of the present invention, having a front display area and a back portion, is comprised of:
Novel features and advantages of the present invention, in addition to those mentioned above, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein similar reference characters refer to similar parts and in which:
The preferred system herein described is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. They are chosen and described to explain the principles of the invention, and the application of the method to practical uses, so that others skilled in the art may practice the invention.
The present invention relates to a single display, using a single motherglass substrate and, preferably a single color filter passive plate, that is divided into multiple, preferably electrically isolated, functional sections. Accordingly, there will be no seal between sections. A few advantages of dividing the screen into multiple screens is:
With the present invention there is no visible “seam” between the sections. With synchronized graphics processors the viewer could see one continuous, large image, or totally independent video scenes, from independent video sources/processors, which could be viewed on each section.
In the embodiment of
In a typical normal mode, the display may operate as a single wide screen panoramic (e.g., 2 section) or large display (e.g., 4 section). One display could replace multiple (e.g., 2-4) independent displays providing equal or greater image area in less space, at lower cost, with no mullions or visible interruptions between adjacent sections.
The present invention provides built-in redundancy. For example, each section is preferably electrically independent from the other sections (e.g., AMLCD, backlight, heater, video/graphic input, graphic/video processor, and power supply) so that if one section fails the other(s) keep(s) operating.
The present invention also reduces the burden of the graphics processor. For example, in the preferred embodiments, each graphics processor drives a portion of the image (e.g., ½ the load per processor on a 2 section AMLCD backplane and ¼ the load on a 4 section AMLCD backplane). Therefore, the present invention has 2-4 times the image update rate for a given graphics processor, or the same image update rate using a less expensive graphics processor.
The present invention also provides a low EMI and/or image noise. For example, the image pixel clock preferably runs at ½ (2 section) or ¼ (4 section) the rate required for “normal” AMLCD of the same physical size and resolution, respectively for the embodiments of
The examples below illustrate specific example embodiments of the present invention.
2 Independent AMLCDs on 1 Glass Backplane:
As an example, replace three 8.00″v×6.00″ 1024×768 AMLCDs (requires 9.00″×21.00″ of panel space & provides 144 in2 of image area), with one 8.00″×20.00″ 1024×1280×2 on one backplane (requires same ˜9.00″×21.00″ of panel space & but provides 11% larger 160 in2 of image area). Replace the 3 chassis, 3 power supplies, 3 AMLCDs, 3 backlights, 3 GPs, etc. with 1 AMLCD, 1 chassis, 2 power supplies, 2 backlights, 2 GPs, etc.
For example, two 42″ 16:9 aspect ratio AMLCDs may be installed on a 1.0×1.2 meter mother glass (or another alternative is one 60″ diagonal on this motherglass). Other examples include a 1.10×1.25 meter mother glass; or 1.50×1.85 meter mother glass (capable of two 67″ diagonal or one 92″ diagonal display from one motherglass).
Having shown and described a preferred embodiment of the invention, those skilled in the art will realize that many variations and modifications may be made to affect the described invention and still be within the scope of the claimed invention. Thus, many of the elements indicated above may be altered or replaced by different elements which will provide the same result and fall within the spirit of the claimed invention. It is the intention, therefore, to limit the invention only as indicated by the scope of the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4740786 | Smith | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4878086 | Isohata et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 5617113 | Prince | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5805117 | Mazurek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5889568 | Seraphim et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6249329 | Dabral et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6259497 | McDonnell et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6341879 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6825829 | Albert et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 20040008155 | Cok | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075623 | Hartman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040150582 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |