Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6574347
-
Patent Number
6,574,347
-
Date Filed
Friday, November 17, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 3, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 381 431
- 381 423
- 381 413
- 381 398
- 381 353
- 381 354
- 381 371
- 381 373
- 381 348
- 381 430
- 381 152
- 181 166
- 181 171
- 181 172
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
An economical and compact flat panel loudspeaker is disclosed that effectively dampens undesirable standing waves that form in the diaphragm without adversely affecting the frequency response. The diaphragm is preferably anisotropic, and has at least one compliant compressed dampening member transposed between it and a substantially planar support. The dampening member is preferably positioned at or near at least one mode of constructive or destructive interference on the diaphragm, and urges the diaphragm away from the planar support, thereby placing as light bending force on the diaphragm, and a slight compression force on the dampening member. Accordingly, the dampening member serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support. In a preferred embodiment, the dampening member is an elongated strip of compliant foam rigidly secured to the diaphragm and planar support and extending through a plurality of modes on the diaphragm. The loudspeaker can include a plurality of dampeners with each dampener having different compliance characteristics. Alternatively, one or more dampeners can have layers of different compliance.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to loudspeakers and, in particular, to a flat-panel loudspeaker, preferably used as a compact speaker in a multimedia computer speaker system.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The use of broadband loudspeaker systems with personal computers is gaining popularity. For example, high fidelity sound is desirable with many multimedia computer applications, such as presentations, games, DVD movies and the like. Moreover, as the applications for using a personal computer expand, the need for high fidelity sound with these applications will also increase.
The typical personal computer rests on a desk, and customers expect computer-related peripherals to be relatively inexpensive. Accordingly, it is desirable to make multimedia computer-related loudspeaker systems as compact and economical as possible, but without compromising sound quality.
Thin loudspeakers, commonly referred to as flat panel loudspeakers, have a small profile and can be manufactured inexpensively. One example of such a loudspeaker is found in published PCT patent application serial number WO 99/67974 to Lock et al. (“Lock et al.”) and titled “Loudspeakers.”
In general, the typical flat panel loudspeaker, such as that disclosed in Lock et al., includes at least one substantially planar diaphragm having different flex, or bending strength, characteristics in each of its major axes. The technical term for this characteristic is anisotropic. The diaphragm is secured to a substantially rigid frame defining a narrow chamber therein. A driver, usually centrally aligned with the diaphragm, is operably secured to the diaphragm within the chamber such that upon activation causes the diaphragm to vibrate at desired frequencies, thereby radiating sound therefrom.
In particular, the driver causes various desirable frequency wave patterns to originate in the center of the diaphragm and radiate outward toward the edges of the diaphragm. However, because of the interaction between the diaphragm and frame, upon reaching the substantially rigid frame supporting the diaphragm, many of the wave patterns are reflected back toward the driver along the diaphragm. The reflected waves interfere with the desirable waves emanating from the center of the diaphragm, forming a standing wave of constructive or destructive interference at particular frequencies along the diaphragm. Such interference compromises the quality of sound produced by the loudspeaker. For example, it can amplify the particular frequencies being subjected to the constructive interference by as much as 30 decibels above the other frequency sounds being emitted by the loudspeaker, distorting the overall sound quality of the loudspeaker. This characteristic is especially pronounced when the particular frequencies being subjected to constructive interference are high frequency sounds.
Efforts to reduce undesirable standing waves in flat panel loudspeakers have had limited success. For example, Lock et al. teaches that a dampening cloth may be secured adjacent to the edges to the diaphragm where it contacts the frame. Such a dampener reduces the likelihood of wave patterns from the diaphragm adversely conducting to the frame. However, such materials and their orientation do little to dampen the reflection of high frequency energy back along the diaphragm. Moreover, traditional devices for dampening limited frequency wave patterns, such as using devices to restrict a particular frequency movement of the diaphragm, tend to adversely limit the movement of the diaphragm for both desirable frequency wave patterns within that range and the undesirable reflected wave patterns of the same frequency. Accordingly, such devices adversely compromise the quality of sound generated by the loudspeaker.
The present invention overcomes these and other problems with known flat panel loudspeakers. It is an economical flat panel loudspeaker that has a small profile, but also effectively dampens undesirable standing waves that form in the diaphragm without adversely dampening the frequency response of the diaphragm, thereby providing superior sound quality.
In a preferred embodiment, a substantially planar anisotropic diaphragm and a substantially parallel, spaced-apart planar support are secured to a substantially rigid frame defining a narrow chamber therein. A driver is preferably centrally aligned with the diaphragm and is operably secured between the diaphragm and planar support within the chamber such that activation of the driver causes the diaphragm to vibrate at desired frequencies. At least one compliant dampening member is transposed between the diaphragm and planar support, preferably at or near at least one mode of constructive or destructive interference. The dampening member urges the diaphragm away from the planar support, thereby placing a slight bending force on the diaphragm, and a slight compression force on the dampening member. Accordingly, the dampening member serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support.
More preferably, the dampening member is an elongated strip of compliant foam rigidly secured to the diaphragm and planar support and extending through a plurality of modes of constructive or destructive interference on the diaphragm. In one preferred embodiment, the diaphragm is generally rectangular shaped, and there are a plurality of dampening members forming at least three elongated strips of compliant foam. A first strip of foam is positioned between the driver and the upper edge of the diaphragm, and aligned substantially parallel to the upper edge of the diaphragm. A second strip of foam is positioned between the driver and one of the side edges of the diaphragm and aligned substantially perpendicular to the first strip, and a third strip of foam is positioned between the driver and the opposite side edge of the diaphragm and aligned substantially parallel to the second strip.
In a first alternative preferred embodiment, the first strip has a different compliance than the second and third strips. In a second alternative preferred embodiment, each dampening member has portions of different compliance aligned such that the less compliant (i.e., stiffer) portion is aligned adjacent to the planar support, and the more compliant portion is aligned adjacent to the diaphragm.
Additional objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description of the preferred embodiment thereof, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is an isometric front view of a flat panel speaker in accordance with a first preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2
is an isometric back view of the flat panel speaker of FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
is a cross-sectional view of the flat panel speaker of
FIG. 1
, taken along line
3
—
3
of FIG.
2
.
FIG. 4
is an exploded isometric view of the flat panel speaker of
FIG. 1
, showing a first detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5
is a back view of a diaphragm the flat panel speaker of
FIG. 1
showing a possible orientation of a compressed dampener in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6A
is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of an uncompressed monolithic dampener taken along line
6
A—
6
A of
FIG. 5
in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6B
is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of an uncompressed dual-density dampener taken along line
6
B—
6
B of
FIG. 5
in accordance with an alternative preferred.embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7
is an isometric view of the flat panel speaker in accordance with
FIG. 1
showing a second detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8
is an isometric view of a third detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
An economical and compact flat panel loudspeaker
10
having superior sound quality is shown in
FIGS. 1-8
.
Referring specifically to
FIGS. 1-4
, and
7
-
8
, the loudspeaker
10
includes a conventional housing
12
, preferably molded of plastic, having a front portion
14
secured to a rear portion
16
and supported by a base
20
. More preferably, the base
20
is detachably secured to the housing
12
and includes either a stand (
22
a
,
FIG. 4
) for allowing the housing
12
to rest on a substantially horizontal flat surface such as a desktop, a wall mounting bracket (
22
b
,
FIG. 8
) for allowing the housing
12
to be detachably secured to a wall
24
or other substantially vertical surface, or a computer monitor mounting bracket (
22
c
,
FIG. 7
) for detachably securing the housing
12
to a computer monitor
26
or other substantially cube-shaped object as shown.
As best shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4
, the housing
12
includes a substantially planar support
30
encircled by a raised lip
32
having a substantially uniform height
34
, thereby defining a chamber
36
therein. Preferably, the lip
32
has a substantially planar outer surface
38
aligned substantially parallel with the planar support
30
.
The substantially planar support
30
preferably includes openings
40
, which serve as conventional vents, placing the chamber
36
in pneumatic communication with the outside environment. More preferably, these openings
40
are covered by a thin layer, or sheet, of a gas permeable material, such as a screen
42
. Such material serves to prevent inadvertent material from entering the chamber
36
, thereby protecting the internal components of the loudspeaker
10
. Moreover, the mesh of the screen
42
can be sized to restrict the flow rate of air passing through the openings
40
, thereby allowing the loudspeaker
10
to be properly fine tuned.
A substantially planar diaphragm
44
extends over the chamber
36
and is secured to the lip
32
of the housing
12
at the outer edge
46
a-d
of the diaphragm
44
, preferably with adhesive (not shown), thereby aligning the substantially planar diaphragm
44
so that it is spaced apart from, and generally parallel to, the substantially planar support
30
. Preferably, a screen
48
or cover extends over the diaphragm
44
to protect it and make it appear more aesthetically pleasing.
The diaphragm
44
is preferably made with an anisotropic material, with a bending strength in a first direction of the plane of the material being greater than the bending strength along a line along the plane of the material and substantially perpendicular to the first direction. More preferably, the diaphragm
44
is an elongated structure with a longitudinal bending strength being about twice its transverse bending strength. Even more preferably, the material is constructed of a polypropylene copolymer, fluted, has a tensile strength of about 28 MPs or more, a shore hardness of 67 or more, is approximately 3 millimeters thick and has a mass of approximately 500 grams per square meter or less. One known material having these properties is a sheet of corrugated polypropylene copolymer, which is commonly known as “core flute” material, because of its internal longitudinal “flutes”
49
or corrugations. Alternatively, the material can compromise a laminate having a core formed of ribs, tubes, corrugations, or the like.
A driver
50
is positioned adjacent to the inner surface
52
a
of the diaphragm
44
, and preferably centrally aligned with the center of the diaphragm
44
as best shown in FIG.
4
. Preferably, the driver
50
includes a voice coil
54
rigidly secured to one of the diaphragm
44
or substantially planar support
30
with the other of the diaphragm
44
or substantially planar support
30
receiving a magnet
56
aligned with the voice coil as shown in FIG.
4
. In
FIG. 4
the voice coil
54
is secured to the diaphragm
44
and the magnet
56
is secured to the substantially planar support
30
. However, the reverse orientation will operate equally effectively.
Preferably, the voice coil
54
has a conventional wire winding
59
secured around a former
58
. The winding
59
is connected by leads
60
to terminals (not shown) on the loudspeaker
10
, or an extension wire (not shown) leading to a conventional loudspeaker power and control system (not shown). Preferably, the magnet
56
is constructed with neodymium and secured at one end to a cylindrical portion
62
, which is preferably steel. A preferably steel top plate
64
is secured to the opposite end of magnet
56
defining a gap
66
between the cylindrical portion
62
and the magnet
56
and top plate
64
as best shown in FIG.
3
. One end of the cylindrical portion
62
is rigidly secured within a recess
68
in the substantially planar support
30
. The opposite end of the cylindrical portion
62
is spaced apart, but encircles a portion of the voice coil
54
. In particular, the magnet
56
and top plate
64
are spaced apart from the cylindrical portion
62
, but received within the cylindrical portion
62
, such that a portion of the winding
59
and former
58
of the voice coil
54
moves within the gap
66
without contacting the cylindrical portion
62
, the magnet
56
, or the top plate
64
.
The driver
50
operates by varying the electric current leading to it, causing the voice coil
54
to move with respect to the magnet
56
, and thereby moving the diaphragm
44
at desired frequencies for producing sound. In particular, the driver
50
causes various desirable frequency wave patterns to originate in the center of the diaphragm
44
and radiate outward toward the outer edge
46
a-d
of the diaphragm
44
. However, upon interacting with the substantially rigid lip
32
of the housing
12
, many of the wave patterns are reflected back toward the driver
50
along the diaphragm
44
. Some of the reflected waves interfere with the desirable waves emanating from the center of the diaphragm
44
, forming acoustically undesirable modes of constructive or destructive interference
69
(referred to collectively as “modes of interference” herein), at particular locations along the diaphragm
44
. The particular frequencies and locations of these undesirable modes of interference
69
are related to the size and shape of the diaphragm
44
and chamber
36
, and the type of materials used in constructing the various components of the loudspeaker
10
. However, for a given set of loudspeaker design parameters, the particular frequencies and locations of the modes of interference, which are also commonly known as undesirable standing waves, are identifiable and generally fixed.
One known method for determining the location of the modes of interference
69
is to remove the protective screen
48
from over the diaphragm
44
and position the loudspeaker
10
such that diaphragm's
44
outer surface
52
b
is substantially horizontal. A powder, or other granulated material is spread evenly over the outer surface
52
b
of the diaphragm
44
, and the loudspeaker
10
is activated. Areas of peak constructive interference will tend to push the powder away from those areas, thereby identifying the modes of constructive or destructive interference
69
of operation for that particular design.
These undesirable standing waves adversely affect the sound quality of the loudspeaker
10
. However, they can be eliminated without adversely affecting the desirable movements of the diaphragm
44
, by extending a compressed dampener
70
between the diaphragm
44
and planar support
30
at or near each of the modes of interference
69
. In particular, the compressed dampener
70
urges the diaphragm
44
away from the planar support
30
, thereby placing a slight bending force on the diaphragm
44
, and a slight compression force on the dampener
70
. Accordingly, the dampener
70
serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm
44
to the planar support
30
.
Preferably, the dampener
70
is a compliant material that is displaced in direct proportion to the force applied to it, and it is compressed between the diaphragm
44
and planar support
30
. Materials having such properties include common open or closed cell foam. One such foam that appears to work particularly well in this application is low density polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) foam. One such known foam is sold in tape form by Scapa Tapes North America of Windsor, Conn., USA under the brand name P3097. This foam has a typical density of 7 lb./ft.
3
(115 Kg/m
3
), a typical Shore Hardness of 20 (OO scale), and a compression deflection of 0.8 N/cm
2
. It typically requires a force of 1.7 N/cm
2
to compress it by 30%, and a force of 2.43 lb./in.
2
(0.17 Kg/cm
2
) to compress it by 50%. Other foams or compliant materials having different specific physical properties will also work in this application.
Preferably, the dampener
70
includes one or more strips
72
a
,
72
b
,
72
c
(shown in
FIG. 5
) of compliant foam, each strip
72
a
,
72
b
,
72
c
having a length
74
, a first surface
76
, an opposite second surface
78
, and a thickness
80
(FIG.
6
A). More preferably, the strips
72
a
,
72
b
,
72
c
are rigidly secured to the diaphragm
44
and planar support
30
along their respective first and second surfaces
76
,
78
respectively. As best shown in
FIG. 6A
, the thickness
80
of the dampener is slightly larger than the distance
82
between the diaphragm
44
and planar support member
30
such that the dampener
70
is slightly compressed when the loudspeaker
10
is assembled. Each strip
72
a
,
72
b
,
72
c
, is aligned along the inner surface
52
a
of the diaphragm
44
such that each strip is over or near a plurality of modes of interference
69
as shown in FIG.
5
. Moreover, the dimensions of the foam and its density are selected to optimize the absorption of the undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support.
Where the desired shape of the loudspeaker
10
is substantially rectangular as shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
, the diaphragm
44
is generally rectangular shaped, and there are at least three elongated strips
72
a
,
72
b
,
72
c
of compliant foam, all of which are preferably monolithic as shown in FIG.
6
A and have the same compliance characteristics. A first strip
72
a
of foam is positioned between the driver
50
and the upper edge
46
a
of the diaphragm
44
, and aligned substantially parallel to the upper edge
46
a
of the diaphragm
44
. A second strip
72
b
of foam is positioned between the driver
50
and one of the side edges
46
b
of the diaphragm
44
and aligned substantially perpendicular to the first strip
72
a
, and a third strip
72
c
of foam is positioned between the driver
50
and the opposite side edge
46
c
of the diaphragm
44
and aligned substantially parallel to the second strip
72
b.
In a first alternative preferred embodiment, the first strip
72
a
is more compliant than the second and third strips
72
b
,
72
c
, respectively. In a second alternative preferred embodiment, each strip
72
a
,
72
b
, and
72
c
has portions of different compliance preferably aligned such that the less compliant (i.e., stiffer) portion
92
is aligned adjacent to the planar support
30
, and the more compliant portion
94
is aligned adjacent to the diaphragm
44
as shown in FIG.
6
B.
Having described and illustrated the principles of our invention with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be apparent that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. For example, the loudspeaker
10
or its diaphragm
44
can assume any desirable shape, such as circular, oval, oblong, or the like. With each shape, the frequency and location of its modes of interference
69
can be determined, and an appropriately sized dampener
70
having appropriately determined compliance characteristics can be selected and positioned at or near one or more modes of operation. Similarly, the particular location of the modes of interference
69
shown in
FIG. 5
are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the claimed invention.
Moreover, the chamber
36
could be pneumatically sealed from the outside environment, or alternatively, venting could be provided through any side or sides of the loudspeaker, including the front of the loudspeaker. Also, the housing
12
can be constructed of any suitable material, including conventional fiberboard or wood. In addition, more than one driver
50
may be operably secured within the chamber, and the substantially planar support could be a second, or alternative, diaphragm.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles may be put, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiment is illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of our invention. Accordingly, we claim as our invention all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Claims
- 1. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support; a driver operably secured between said diaphragm and said support; a compliant dampener having layers of different compliance secured within said gap and extending between said diaphragm and said support; and, wherein said support includes openings for placing said chamber in pneumatic and acoustic communication with an outside environment.
- 2. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber, said support having openings for placing said acoustic chamber in pneumatic and acoustic communication with an outside environment and a screen extending over said openings; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support; a driver operably secured between said diaphragm and said support; and, a compliant dampener secured within said gap and extending between said diaphragm and said support.
- 3. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is substantially planar, and said diaphragm is spaced apart and aligned substantially parallel to said support.
- 4. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said compliant dampener is an elongated strip of material.
- 5. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 4, wherein said strip of material is substantially rectangular and has a thickness greater than said gap such that said material is compressed between said diaphragm and said support.
- 6. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 5, wherein said strip of material is foam.
- 7. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said foam is open cell foam.
- 8. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said foam is closed cell foam.
- 9. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is substantially rigid.
- 10. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is a substantially planar.
- 11. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said dampener is a monolithic structure having a uniform compliance.
- 12. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a substantially rectangular shaped housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support.said diaphragm being in pneumatic and acoustic communication with said chamber and having a plurality of modes of interference during operation of the loudspeaker; said diaphragm is substantially rectangular shaped defining an upper edge, a lower edge, and two sides; a driver operably secured adjacent to a center of said diaphragm and between said diaphragm and said support; and, a plurality of compliant dampeners defining a first, second, and third elongated dampeners, said plurality of compliant dampeners extending between said diaphragm and said support; said first dampener positioned between said driver and said upper edge of said diaphragm and aligned substantially parallel to said upper edge of said diaphragm such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference; said second dampener positioned between said driver and one of said sides of said diaphragm substantially perpendicular to said first dampener such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference; and said third dampener position between said driver and the other of said sides of said diaphragm substantially parallel to said second dampener such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference.
- 13. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 12, wherein said first dampener has a different compliance than said second and third dampeners.
US Referenced Citations (9)