Flat-panel loudspeaker with compressed dampeners

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6574347
  • Patent Number
    6,574,347
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 17, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 3, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
An economical and compact flat panel loudspeaker is disclosed that effectively dampens undesirable standing waves that form in the diaphragm without adversely affecting the frequency response. The diaphragm is preferably anisotropic, and has at least one compliant compressed dampening member transposed between it and a substantially planar support. The dampening member is preferably positioned at or near at least one mode of constructive or destructive interference on the diaphragm, and urges the diaphragm away from the planar support, thereby placing as light bending force on the diaphragm, and a slight compression force on the dampening member. Accordingly, the dampening member serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support. In a preferred embodiment, the dampening member is an elongated strip of compliant foam rigidly secured to the diaphragm and planar support and extending through a plurality of modes on the diaphragm. The loudspeaker can include a plurality of dampeners with each dampener having different compliance characteristics. Alternatively, one or more dampeners can have layers of different compliance.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to loudspeakers and, in particular, to a flat-panel loudspeaker, preferably used as a compact speaker in a multimedia computer speaker system.




BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The use of broadband loudspeaker systems with personal computers is gaining popularity. For example, high fidelity sound is desirable with many multimedia computer applications, such as presentations, games, DVD movies and the like. Moreover, as the applications for using a personal computer expand, the need for high fidelity sound with these applications will also increase.




The typical personal computer rests on a desk, and customers expect computer-related peripherals to be relatively inexpensive. Accordingly, it is desirable to make multimedia computer-related loudspeaker systems as compact and economical as possible, but without compromising sound quality.




Thin loudspeakers, commonly referred to as flat panel loudspeakers, have a small profile and can be manufactured inexpensively. One example of such a loudspeaker is found in published PCT patent application serial number WO 99/67974 to Lock et al. (“Lock et al.”) and titled “Loudspeakers.”




In general, the typical flat panel loudspeaker, such as that disclosed in Lock et al., includes at least one substantially planar diaphragm having different flex, or bending strength, characteristics in each of its major axes. The technical term for this characteristic is anisotropic. The diaphragm is secured to a substantially rigid frame defining a narrow chamber therein. A driver, usually centrally aligned with the diaphragm, is operably secured to the diaphragm within the chamber such that upon activation causes the diaphragm to vibrate at desired frequencies, thereby radiating sound therefrom.




In particular, the driver causes various desirable frequency wave patterns to originate in the center of the diaphragm and radiate outward toward the edges of the diaphragm. However, because of the interaction between the diaphragm and frame, upon reaching the substantially rigid frame supporting the diaphragm, many of the wave patterns are reflected back toward the driver along the diaphragm. The reflected waves interfere with the desirable waves emanating from the center of the diaphragm, forming a standing wave of constructive or destructive interference at particular frequencies along the diaphragm. Such interference compromises the quality of sound produced by the loudspeaker. For example, it can amplify the particular frequencies being subjected to the constructive interference by as much as 30 decibels above the other frequency sounds being emitted by the loudspeaker, distorting the overall sound quality of the loudspeaker. This characteristic is especially pronounced when the particular frequencies being subjected to constructive interference are high frequency sounds.




Efforts to reduce undesirable standing waves in flat panel loudspeakers have had limited success. For example, Lock et al. teaches that a dampening cloth may be secured adjacent to the edges to the diaphragm where it contacts the frame. Such a dampener reduces the likelihood of wave patterns from the diaphragm adversely conducting to the frame. However, such materials and their orientation do little to dampen the reflection of high frequency energy back along the diaphragm. Moreover, traditional devices for dampening limited frequency wave patterns, such as using devices to restrict a particular frequency movement of the diaphragm, tend to adversely limit the movement of the diaphragm for both desirable frequency wave patterns within that range and the undesirable reflected wave patterns of the same frequency. Accordingly, such devices adversely compromise the quality of sound generated by the loudspeaker.




The present invention overcomes these and other problems with known flat panel loudspeakers. It is an economical flat panel loudspeaker that has a small profile, but also effectively dampens undesirable standing waves that form in the diaphragm without adversely dampening the frequency response of the diaphragm, thereby providing superior sound quality.




In a preferred embodiment, a substantially planar anisotropic diaphragm and a substantially parallel, spaced-apart planar support are secured to a substantially rigid frame defining a narrow chamber therein. A driver is preferably centrally aligned with the diaphragm and is operably secured between the diaphragm and planar support within the chamber such that activation of the driver causes the diaphragm to vibrate at desired frequencies. At least one compliant dampening member is transposed between the diaphragm and planar support, preferably at or near at least one mode of constructive or destructive interference. The dampening member urges the diaphragm away from the planar support, thereby placing a slight bending force on the diaphragm, and a slight compression force on the dampening member. Accordingly, the dampening member serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support.




More preferably, the dampening member is an elongated strip of compliant foam rigidly secured to the diaphragm and planar support and extending through a plurality of modes of constructive or destructive interference on the diaphragm. In one preferred embodiment, the diaphragm is generally rectangular shaped, and there are a plurality of dampening members forming at least three elongated strips of compliant foam. A first strip of foam is positioned between the driver and the upper edge of the diaphragm, and aligned substantially parallel to the upper edge of the diaphragm. A second strip of foam is positioned between the driver and one of the side edges of the diaphragm and aligned substantially perpendicular to the first strip, and a third strip of foam is positioned between the driver and the opposite side edge of the diaphragm and aligned substantially parallel to the second strip.




In a first alternative preferred embodiment, the first strip has a different compliance than the second and third strips. In a second alternative preferred embodiment, each dampening member has portions of different compliance aligned such that the less compliant (i.e., stiffer) portion is aligned adjacent to the planar support, and the more compliant portion is aligned adjacent to the diaphragm.




Additional objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description of the preferred embodiment thereof, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an isometric front view of a flat panel speaker in accordance with a first preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is an isometric back view of the flat panel speaker of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of the flat panel speaker of

FIG. 1

, taken along line


3





3


of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is an exploded isometric view of the flat panel speaker of

FIG. 1

, showing a first detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a back view of a diaphragm the flat panel speaker of

FIG. 1

showing a possible orientation of a compressed dampener in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6A

is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of an uncompressed monolithic dampener taken along line


6


A—


6


A of

FIG. 5

in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6B

is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of an uncompressed dual-density dampener taken along line


6


B—


6


B of

FIG. 5

in accordance with an alternative preferred.embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 7

is an isometric view of the flat panel speaker in accordance with

FIG. 1

showing a second detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is an isometric view of a third detachable mounting base in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




An economical and compact flat panel loudspeaker


10


having superior sound quality is shown in

FIGS. 1-8

.




Referring specifically to

FIGS. 1-4

, and


7


-


8


, the loudspeaker


10


includes a conventional housing


12


, preferably molded of plastic, having a front portion


14


secured to a rear portion


16


and supported by a base


20


. More preferably, the base


20


is detachably secured to the housing


12


and includes either a stand (


22




a


,

FIG. 4

) for allowing the housing


12


to rest on a substantially horizontal flat surface such as a desktop, a wall mounting bracket (


22




b


,

FIG. 8

) for allowing the housing


12


to be detachably secured to a wall


24


or other substantially vertical surface, or a computer monitor mounting bracket (


22




c


,

FIG. 7

) for detachably securing the housing


12


to a computer monitor


26


or other substantially cube-shaped object as shown.




As best shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, the housing


12


includes a substantially planar support


30


encircled by a raised lip


32


having a substantially uniform height


34


, thereby defining a chamber


36


therein. Preferably, the lip


32


has a substantially planar outer surface


38


aligned substantially parallel with the planar support


30


.




The substantially planar support


30


preferably includes openings


40


, which serve as conventional vents, placing the chamber


36


in pneumatic communication with the outside environment. More preferably, these openings


40


are covered by a thin layer, or sheet, of a gas permeable material, such as a screen


42


. Such material serves to prevent inadvertent material from entering the chamber


36


, thereby protecting the internal components of the loudspeaker


10


. Moreover, the mesh of the screen


42


can be sized to restrict the flow rate of air passing through the openings


40


, thereby allowing the loudspeaker


10


to be properly fine tuned.




A substantially planar diaphragm


44


extends over the chamber


36


and is secured to the lip


32


of the housing


12


at the outer edge


46




a-d


of the diaphragm


44


, preferably with adhesive (not shown), thereby aligning the substantially planar diaphragm


44


so that it is spaced apart from, and generally parallel to, the substantially planar support


30


. Preferably, a screen


48


or cover extends over the diaphragm


44


to protect it and make it appear more aesthetically pleasing.




The diaphragm


44


is preferably made with an anisotropic material, with a bending strength in a first direction of the plane of the material being greater than the bending strength along a line along the plane of the material and substantially perpendicular to the first direction. More preferably, the diaphragm


44


is an elongated structure with a longitudinal bending strength being about twice its transverse bending strength. Even more preferably, the material is constructed of a polypropylene copolymer, fluted, has a tensile strength of about 28 MPs or more, a shore hardness of 67 or more, is approximately 3 millimeters thick and has a mass of approximately 500 grams per square meter or less. One known material having these properties is a sheet of corrugated polypropylene copolymer, which is commonly known as “core flute” material, because of its internal longitudinal “flutes”


49


or corrugations. Alternatively, the material can compromise a laminate having a core formed of ribs, tubes, corrugations, or the like.




A driver


50


is positioned adjacent to the inner surface


52




a


of the diaphragm


44


, and preferably centrally aligned with the center of the diaphragm


44


as best shown in FIG.


4


. Preferably, the driver


50


includes a voice coil


54


rigidly secured to one of the diaphragm


44


or substantially planar support


30


with the other of the diaphragm


44


or substantially planar support


30


receiving a magnet


56


aligned with the voice coil as shown in FIG.


4


. In

FIG. 4

the voice coil


54


is secured to the diaphragm


44


and the magnet


56


is secured to the substantially planar support


30


. However, the reverse orientation will operate equally effectively.




Preferably, the voice coil


54


has a conventional wire winding


59


secured around a former


58


. The winding


59


is connected by leads


60


to terminals (not shown) on the loudspeaker


10


, or an extension wire (not shown) leading to a conventional loudspeaker power and control system (not shown). Preferably, the magnet


56


is constructed with neodymium and secured at one end to a cylindrical portion


62


, which is preferably steel. A preferably steel top plate


64


is secured to the opposite end of magnet


56


defining a gap


66


between the cylindrical portion


62


and the magnet


56


and top plate


64


as best shown in FIG.


3


. One end of the cylindrical portion


62


is rigidly secured within a recess


68


in the substantially planar support


30


. The opposite end of the cylindrical portion


62


is spaced apart, but encircles a portion of the voice coil


54


. In particular, the magnet


56


and top plate


64


are spaced apart from the cylindrical portion


62


, but received within the cylindrical portion


62


, such that a portion of the winding


59


and former


58


of the voice coil


54


moves within the gap


66


without contacting the cylindrical portion


62


, the magnet


56


, or the top plate


64


.




The driver


50


operates by varying the electric current leading to it, causing the voice coil


54


to move with respect to the magnet


56


, and thereby moving the diaphragm


44


at desired frequencies for producing sound. In particular, the driver


50


causes various desirable frequency wave patterns to originate in the center of the diaphragm


44


and radiate outward toward the outer edge


46




a-d


of the diaphragm


44


. However, upon interacting with the substantially rigid lip


32


of the housing


12


, many of the wave patterns are reflected back toward the driver


50


along the diaphragm


44


. Some of the reflected waves interfere with the desirable waves emanating from the center of the diaphragm


44


, forming acoustically undesirable modes of constructive or destructive interference


69


(referred to collectively as “modes of interference” herein), at particular locations along the diaphragm


44


. The particular frequencies and locations of these undesirable modes of interference


69


are related to the size and shape of the diaphragm


44


and chamber


36


, and the type of materials used in constructing the various components of the loudspeaker


10


. However, for a given set of loudspeaker design parameters, the particular frequencies and locations of the modes of interference, which are also commonly known as undesirable standing waves, are identifiable and generally fixed.




One known method for determining the location of the modes of interference


69


is to remove the protective screen


48


from over the diaphragm


44


and position the loudspeaker


10


such that diaphragm's


44


outer surface


52




b


is substantially horizontal. A powder, or other granulated material is spread evenly over the outer surface


52




b


of the diaphragm


44


, and the loudspeaker


10


is activated. Areas of peak constructive interference will tend to push the powder away from those areas, thereby identifying the modes of constructive or destructive interference


69


of operation for that particular design.




These undesirable standing waves adversely affect the sound quality of the loudspeaker


10


. However, they can be eliminated without adversely affecting the desirable movements of the diaphragm


44


, by extending a compressed dampener


70


between the diaphragm


44


and planar support


30


at or near each of the modes of interference


69


. In particular, the compressed dampener


70


urges the diaphragm


44


away from the planar support


30


, thereby placing a slight bending force on the diaphragm


44


, and a slight compression force on the dampener


70


. Accordingly, the dampener


70


serves as a sink for transferring undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm


44


to the planar support


30


.




Preferably, the dampener


70


is a compliant material that is displaced in direct proportion to the force applied to it, and it is compressed between the diaphragm


44


and planar support


30


. Materials having such properties include common open or closed cell foam. One such foam that appears to work particularly well in this application is low density polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) foam. One such known foam is sold in tape form by Scapa Tapes North America of Windsor, Conn., USA under the brand name P3097. This foam has a typical density of 7 lb./ft.


3


(115 Kg/m


3


), a typical Shore Hardness of 20 (OO scale), and a compression deflection of 0.8 N/cm


2


. It typically requires a force of 1.7 N/cm


2


to compress it by 30%, and a force of 2.43 lb./in.


2


(0.17 Kg/cm


2


) to compress it by 50%. Other foams or compliant materials having different specific physical properties will also work in this application.




Preferably, the dampener


70


includes one or more strips


72




a


,


72




b


,


72




c


(shown in

FIG. 5

) of compliant foam, each strip


72




a


,


72




b


,


72




c


having a length


74


, a first surface


76


, an opposite second surface


78


, and a thickness


80


(FIG.


6


A). More preferably, the strips


72




a


,


72




b


,


72




c


are rigidly secured to the diaphragm


44


and planar support


30


along their respective first and second surfaces


76


,


78


respectively. As best shown in

FIG. 6A

, the thickness


80


of the dampener is slightly larger than the distance


82


between the diaphragm


44


and planar support member


30


such that the dampener


70


is slightly compressed when the loudspeaker


10


is assembled. Each strip


72




a


,


72




b


,


72




c


, is aligned along the inner surface


52




a


of the diaphragm


44


such that each strip is over or near a plurality of modes of interference


69


as shown in FIG.


5


. Moreover, the dimensions of the foam and its density are selected to optimize the absorption of the undesirable standing waves from the diaphragm to the planar support.




Where the desired shape of the loudspeaker


10


is substantially rectangular as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the diaphragm


44


is generally rectangular shaped, and there are at least three elongated strips


72




a


,


72




b


,


72




c


of compliant foam, all of which are preferably monolithic as shown in FIG.


6


A and have the same compliance characteristics. A first strip


72




a


of foam is positioned between the driver


50


and the upper edge


46




a


of the diaphragm


44


, and aligned substantially parallel to the upper edge


46




a


of the diaphragm


44


. A second strip


72




b


of foam is positioned between the driver


50


and one of the side edges


46




b


of the diaphragm


44


and aligned substantially perpendicular to the first strip


72




a


, and a third strip


72




c


of foam is positioned between the driver


50


and the opposite side edge


46




c


of the diaphragm


44


and aligned substantially parallel to the second strip


72




b.






In a first alternative preferred embodiment, the first strip


72




a


is more compliant than the second and third strips


72




b


,


72




c


, respectively. In a second alternative preferred embodiment, each strip


72




a


,


72




b


, and


72




c


has portions of different compliance preferably aligned such that the less compliant (i.e., stiffer) portion


92


is aligned adjacent to the planar support


30


, and the more compliant portion


94


is aligned adjacent to the diaphragm


44


as shown in FIG.


6


B.




Having described and illustrated the principles of our invention with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be apparent that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. For example, the loudspeaker


10


or its diaphragm


44


can assume any desirable shape, such as circular, oval, oblong, or the like. With each shape, the frequency and location of its modes of interference


69


can be determined, and an appropriately sized dampener


70


having appropriately determined compliance characteristics can be selected and positioned at or near one or more modes of operation. Similarly, the particular location of the modes of interference


69


shown in

FIG. 5

are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the claimed invention.




Moreover, the chamber


36


could be pneumatically sealed from the outside environment, or alternatively, venting could be provided through any side or sides of the loudspeaker, including the front of the loudspeaker. Also, the housing


12


can be constructed of any suitable material, including conventional fiberboard or wood. In addition, more than one driver


50


may be operably secured within the chamber, and the substantially planar support could be a second, or alternative, diaphragm.




In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles may be put, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiment is illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of our invention. Accordingly, we claim as our invention all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.



Claims
  • 1. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support; a driver operably secured between said diaphragm and said support; a compliant dampener having layers of different compliance secured within said gap and extending between said diaphragm and said support; and, wherein said support includes openings for placing said chamber in pneumatic and acoustic communication with an outside environment.
  • 2. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber, said support having openings for placing said acoustic chamber in pneumatic and acoustic communication with an outside environment and a screen extending over said openings; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support; a driver operably secured between said diaphragm and said support; and, a compliant dampener secured within said gap and extending between said diaphragm and said support.
  • 3. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is substantially planar, and said diaphragm is spaced apart and aligned substantially parallel to said support.
  • 4. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said compliant dampener is an elongated strip of material.
  • 5. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 4, wherein said strip of material is substantially rectangular and has a thickness greater than said gap such that said material is compressed between said diaphragm and said support.
  • 6. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 5, wherein said strip of material is foam.
  • 7. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said foam is open cell foam.
  • 8. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said foam is closed cell foam.
  • 9. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is substantially rigid.
  • 10. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said support is a substantially planar.
  • 11. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 2, wherein said dampener is a monolithic structure having a uniform compliance.
  • 12. A flat-panel loudspeaker including:a substantially rectangular shaped housing having an acoustic chamber and a support adjacent to said acoustic chamber; a substantially planar diaphragm secured to the housing and extending over the chamber defining a gap between said diaphragm and said support.said diaphragm being in pneumatic and acoustic communication with said chamber and having a plurality of modes of interference during operation of the loudspeaker; said diaphragm is substantially rectangular shaped defining an upper edge, a lower edge, and two sides; a driver operably secured adjacent to a center of said diaphragm and between said diaphragm and said support; and, a plurality of compliant dampeners defining a first, second, and third elongated dampeners, said plurality of compliant dampeners extending between said diaphragm and said support; said first dampener positioned between said driver and said upper edge of said diaphragm and aligned substantially parallel to said upper edge of said diaphragm such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference; said second dampener positioned between said driver and one of said sides of said diaphragm substantially perpendicular to said first dampener such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference; and said third dampener position between said driver and the other of said sides of said diaphragm substantially parallel to said second dampener such that it extends over at least two of said plurality of modes of interference.
  • 13. The flat-panel loudspeaker of claim 12, wherein said first dampener has a different compliance than said second and third dampeners.
US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
3801943 Bertagni Apr 1974 A
3997023 White Dec 1976 A
4003449 Bertagni Jan 1977 A
4426556 Saiki et al. Jan 1984 A
4517416 Goossens May 1985 A
4803733 Carver et al. Feb 1989 A
6035052 Fujihira et al. Mar 2000 A
6282298 Azima et al. Aug 2001 B1
6422337 Tseng Jul 2002 B1