The object of the invention is a flat tube for a heat exchanger and a heat exchanger.
There are known in the art tubes for heat exchangers, for example condensers, which are used to guide a fluid and enable its cooling.
Such heat exchangers can be implemented in vehicles, e.g. cars. These vehicles are directly exposed to debris such as stones or other objects, either when they are moving or when they are stationary. The stones can travel at significant speed and can impact the heat exchanger, which in most cases is situated in front of the car and is at least partly exposed or can be reached after passing through the radiator grill. Impact of such objects can cause damage to the elements of the heat exchanger, which may lead to leaks of the fluid flowing through them and/or to deterioration of their performance.
It is thus desirable to provide an improved tube for a heat exchanger, which would be more resistant to debris and consequently which would reduce a chance of leakage and/or decrease in performance.
The object of invention is a flat tube for a heat exchanger, with two open ends defining its longitudinal direction, comprising a first wall and a second wall which are flat and parallel to each other, thereby delimiting the inner space of the tube, and further comprising an inner fin located between the first and the second walls, wherein one of the lateral sides of the first wall comprises a main fold running along the longitudinal direction, wherein arms of the main fold form a slit facing the inner space of the tube, and the lateral side of the second wall is bent to cover the main fold.
Preferably, the lateral side of the fin adjacent to the main fold leans on the slit of the main fold.
Preferably, the lateral side of the fin adjacent to the main fold is placed inside the slit of the main fold.
Preferably, the lateral side of the fin adjacent to the main fold, placed inside the slit, is a single layer of that fin.
Preferably, the lateral side of the fin adjacent to the main fold, placed inside the slit, is compressed by the arms of the main fold.
Preferably, plane of the slit is parallel to planes of the first wall and the second wall.
Preferably, the slit is located in the middle of the distance between the first wall and the second wall.
Preferably, the slit of the main fold is displaced towards the plane of the first wall or the second wall.
Preferably, the lateral side of the first wall comprises a secondary fold, adjacent to one of the arms of the main fold.
Preferably, the lateral side of the first wall comprises two secondary folds, adjacent to both arms of the main fold.
Preferably, the lateral side of the second wall, bent over the main fold, is folded along this main fold.
Preferably, the main fold is a double-walled nose, the walls of said double-walled nose contacting each other along a contact section, wherein walls of the nose have equal lateral length.
Preferably, the contact section of the walls of the double-walled nose runs in parallel to planes of the first wall and the second wall.
Preferably, the lateral side of the second wall, bent over the double walled nose, is bent so that it contacts both walls of the double walled nose.
Preferably, the lateral side of the second wall, bent over the double walled nose, is also double walled.
Preferably, the lateral side of the second wall, bent over the double walled nose, consists of one layer.
Preferably, the thickness of the reinforced tube nose in lateral direction is in the range [0.5×tube height; 1.5×tube height] and preferentially in the range [0.5×tube height; tube height].
Another object of the invention is a heat exchanger comprising a tube as described.
The object of the invention has been presented by means of a drawing, in which:
The main fold 4 can be formed in the middle between the first wall 1 and the second wall 2, so that the slit 5 will also be in the middle between the first wall 1 and the second wall 2. This facilitates a substantially identical resistance from both sides of the tube, i.e. the resistance will be improved substantially identically with respect to stones impacting from the side of the first wall 1 and from the side of the second wall 2, as illustrated in
It is also envisaged to position the main fold 4 (and consequently the slit 5) at another distance with respect to the first or second walls. For example, the main fold 4 located closer to the first wall 1 will contribute more to its resistance from the side of said first wall 1. Similarly, the main fold 4 located nearer the second wall 2 will contribute more to its resistance from the side of said second wall 2. In other words, the slit 5 (plane of the slit) of the main fold 4 can be displaced towards the plane of the first or second wall 1, 2. By term “plane” it is meant a general plane of the flat portion. Such feature may be advantageous in case of an unorthodox arrangement of the tubes, e.g. oriented an angle with respect to driving direction or at angle corresponding to statistically more probable angle of stone impact.
Preferably, the lateral side of the fin 3 adjacent to the main fold 4, placed inside the slit 5, is a single layer of that fin 3. This simplifies the manufacturing process and saves material.
Preferably, the slit 5 is substantially parallel to the first and second walls, and to the general lateral direction of the fin 3. In other words, plane of the slit 5 is parallel to planes of the first wall 1 and the second wall 2. Consequently, the fragment of the fin 3 placed inside the slit 5 effectively enhances the rigidity of the tube at minimal cost of both production and material. At the same time, such orientation ensures a substantially identical resistance from both sides of the tube, as illustrated in
The respective end of the second wall 2 is bent around the main fold 4 so that it encompasses it. In other words, the lateral end of the second wall 2 forms a side wall 6, which covers the main fold 4 of the first wall 1. This further strengthens the tube. At the same time it protects the main fold 4 and enables the tube to have a unitary, unobtrusive shape.
The embodiments present a slit 5 of certain lateral length. The lateral length of slit 5 of the main fold 4 is dependent on the lateral length of the arms of the main fold 4. The longer the slit 5, the more resistant the nose of the tube, as the thicknesses of the main fold 4 and the side of the second wall 6 compound at longer distance. As the side of the fin 4 runs deeper in the slit 5, the resistance is further improved.
The main fold 4 may form a double-walled nose along the longitudinal direction. In such case, the slit 5 can be a contact section facing the delimited space inside the flat tube. This contact section is constituted by two substantially parallel walls of the double-walled nose.
The tube according to the invention may be a tube made of a single sheet of material. It can also be made of two sheets of material, constituting for example separately its first and second walls. Consequently, the disclosed nose of the tube can be present on one lateral side of the tube, or both lateral sides of the tube. The thickness of the reinforced tube nose can be in the range [0.5×tube height; 1.5×tube height] and preferentially in the range [0.5×tube height; tube height]. The tube height here is defined along an axis perpendicular to longitudinal and lateral directions.
These tubes can be produced by roll forming, similar to the process for currently known tubes with bends or folds.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17169134 | May 2017 | EP | regional |
17169138 | May 2017 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/061049 | 4/30/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/202630 | 11/8/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2912749 | Huggins | Nov 1959 | A |
6213158 | Rhodes | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6666265 | Kato | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7921559 | Zobel | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8091621 | Zobel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8438728 | Zobel | May 2013 | B2 |
10267572 | Kaestle | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10677537 | Kitou | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20050173100 | Takai | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070119581 | Kato | May 2007 | A1 |
20090019695 | Zobel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20120031602 | Eisele | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101450355 | Jun 2009 | CN |
106556279 | Apr 2017 | CN |
197 53 724 | Jun 1999 | DE |
10 2006 016711 | Oct 2007 | DE |
10 2007 004993 | Aug 2008 | DE |
0283937 | Sep 1988 | EP |
1 702 710 | Sep 2006 | EP |
H07-158999 | Jun 1995 | JP |
0149443 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2013150766 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201880029472.6, dated Nov. 3, 2020 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2018/061049, dated Jul. 25, 2018 (9 pages). |
Communication from the Examining Division in corresponding European Application No. 17 169 134.8, dated Feb. 17, 2022 (5 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200072558 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |