This application is a U.S. National Phase filing of International Application No. PCT/IB2016/051045 filed 25 Feb. 2016, which claims priority to EP Application No. 15157068.6 filed 27 Feb. 2015, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to, inter alia, improved replicons and replicon-encoding vectors for expression of heterologous proteins and related methods of using the same.
Self-replicating ribonucleic acids (RNAs), e.g., derived from viral replicons, are useful for expression of proteins, such as heterologous proteins, for a variety of purposes, such as expression of therapeutic proteins and expression of antigens for vaccines. A desirable property of such replicons is the ability for sustained expression of the protein.
WO 99/28487 A1 (Queensland Dept. Health) and Varnayski et al., Virology 255, 366-375 (1999) disclose a nucleic acid sequence encoding a(+) strand self-replicating RNA, which includes a Kunjin Virus replicase-coding sequence, a protein-coding sequence coding for a portion of a flavivirus core protein and a flavivirus 5′ untranslated region (UTR). The replicons could be packaged into viral replicon particles (VRPs) and used as vaccines.
Herd et al., “Recombinant Kunjin virus replicon vaccines induce protective T-cell immunity against human papillomavirus 16 E7-expressing tumour”, Virology 319: 237-248 (2004) discloses a nucleic acid sequence encoding a(+) strand self-replicating RNA, which includes a Kunjin Virus replicase-coding sequence and a protein-coding sequence coding for a human papilloma virus (HPV) epitope to be used as vaccine.
Alcaraz-Estrada et al., “Construction of self-replicating subgenomic West Nile virus replicons for screening antiviral compounds”, Methods Mol. Biol. 1030: 283-299 (2013) discloses a nucleic acid sequence encoding a(+) strand self-replicating RNA, which includes a West Nile Virus strain 956 replicase-coding sequence and a reporter gene.
WO 2006/086838 A1 (Queensland Inst. Med. Res.) discloses a (+) strand self-replicating RNA, which includes a Kunjin Virus replicase-coding sequence and a protein-coding sequence for a GM-CSF protein for use in tumor therapy. The '838 patent application also discloses the use of West Nile Virus and Yellow Fever Virus.
Queiroz et al., “Construction of yellow fever virus subgenomic replicons by yeast-based homologous recombination cloning technique”, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 85: 159-168 (2010) discloses a nucleic acid sequence encoding a(+) strand self-replicating RNA, which includes a Yellow Fever Virus strain 170 replicase-coding sequence and a reporter gene.
Jones et al., “Construction and applications of yellow fever virus replicons”, Virology 331: 247-259 (2005) discloses Yellow Fever Virus replicons encoding various reporter genes.
The invention provides, inter alia, improved replicons and vectors encoding them, where the replicons provide sustained expression of an encoded protein. These replicons comprise flavivirus replicases and heterologous protein coding sequences. The heterologous protein coding sequences are flanked by separation sequences for improved efficacy. These nucleic acids provided by the invention, including self-replicating RNAs provided by the invention, are useful in methods of protein expression, such as for vaccines (e.g., for methods of immunization), as well as expression of therapeutic proteins, such as antibodies (e.g., for methods of treatment).
This invention is further illustrated by the following examples, which should not be construed as limiting. The examples refer to the following figures:
In a first embodiment, the invention provides isolated nucleic acids comprising a sequence encoding a (+) strand self-replicating RNA, the self-replicating RNA comprising a flavivirus replicase-coding sequence and a heterologous protein-coding sequence, the heterologous protein coding sequence being disposed between at least two flanking separation sequences, the self-replicating RNA lacking coding sequence for viral structural proteins capable of forming viral particles.
A “flavivirus replicase” comprises the minimal machinery (e.g., protein and/or nucleotide factors) necessary for viral RNA replication in a suitable expression system, e.g., with transcriptional machinery, translational machinery, or transcriptional machinery and translational machinery. Exemplary expression systems include host cells, such as insect host cells or mammalian host cells. In some embodiments, the flavivirus replicase comprises NSPs (non-structural proteins; also called NSs) 3-5 (e.g., optionally including NS1, NS2 (including NS2A, NS2B, or both NS2A and NS2B), or NS1 and NS2) of one or more flaviviruses, including naturally occurring sequences, chimeric sequences, and synthetic derivatives.
In a second embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the first embodiment, wherein the flavivirus replicase is a West Nile Virus (WNV) replicase.
In a third embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the second embodiment, wherein the WNV is selected from WNV NY99, WN NY 2000-crow3356, HNY1999, NY99flamingo38299, IS98STD, goose-Hungary/03, Italy1998Equine, RO9750, VLG4, LEIV-VIg99-27889, PaH001, PaAn001, Eg101, Chin-01, Sarafend, B956 (WNFCG), goshawk-Hungary/04, LEIV-Krnd88-190, Nea Santa-Greece 2010, Goshawk-Hungary/04, Greece/2012/Kavala.39.1, Italy/2013/Rovigo/32.1, Austria/2008-gh, more particularly wherein the strain is selected from WNV NY99, WN NY 2000-crow3356, or HNY1999.
In a fourth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any of the previous embodiments, wherein the replicase comprises an amino acid sequence with at least 60% homology to SEQ ID NO: 2. In some other embodiments, the flavivirus replicase is at least about 60% (e.g., about: 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99.9%, or more) homologous to a YFV or WNV sequence given by, for example SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4, or portions thereof corresponding to NSs3-5, or more particularly, further including NS1, NS2 (including NS2A, NS2B, or both NS2A and NS2B), or NS1 and NS2 Additional sequences for flavivirus replicases are provided in NCBI reference accession no. ABU54838, which provides boundaries for the given NSP in the viral polyprotein. Corresponding sequences from other strains of WNV, YFV, or other flaviviruses (such as groups: Aroa, Dengue, Japanese encephalitis (which includes WNV), Kokobera, Ntaya, Spondweni, Yellow fever, Entebbe, Modic, and Rio Bravo) can be used in the invention and can be readily identified by annotations in publically-available sequences as well as by alignment to reference sequences provided herein (e.g., by BLAST). Additional strains are provided in Tables A and B. Further strains are described in Bakonyi et al. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12(4):618-23 (April 2006); Hernandez-Triana et al. Front. Public Health 2:271. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00271; Wang, et al., J. of General Virology 78:1349-1352 (1997); Wang et al. Virology 225: 274-281 (1996), each of which is incorporated by reference for these descriptions.
In a fifth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the first embodiment, wherein the flavivirus replicase is a Yellow Fever Virus (YFV) replicase.
In a sixth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the fifth embodiment, wherein the YFV is 17D vaccine strain, Asibi strain, Uganda481, Angola71, 17D-204, 17DD, 17D-213, Uganda2010, 88/1999; more particularly where the strain is 17D vaccine strain or Asibi strain.
In a seventh embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the fifth or sixth embodiment, wherein the replicase comprises an amino acid sequence with at least 60% homology to SEQ ID NO: 4. In some other embodiments, the replicase comprises an amino acid sequence with at least 60% homology (e.g., about 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99.9%, or more) to SEQ ID NO: 4.
In an eighth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the separation sequences are viral 2A sequences. Exemplary 2A sequences are provided in Table 1, infra, and can also readily be identified by the skilled artisan.
In a ninth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the eighth embodiment, wherein the two flanking separation sequences are selected from foot-and-mouth virus 2A, porcine teschovirus 2A, or a picornavirus 2A.
In a tenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the at least two flanking separation sequences do not recombine.
In an eleventh embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the self-replicating RNA retains a functional 5′ UTR corresponding to a natural starting sequence of viral isolates. A functional 5′ UTR comprises a minimal sequence necessary for the RNA to self-replicate in the presence of a suitable expression system. A natural starting sequence of a viral isolate corresponds to naturally occurring 5′ UTRs, and in some embodiments comprises the first about 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 or 70 nucleotides, or more, of 5′ viral sequence.
In a twelfth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the synthesis of the self-replicating RNA is driven by a promoter selected from T7, SPC6, CMV, or a functional fragment of any of the foregoing. In certain other embodiments, the self-replicating RNA is in operative association with (e.g., its expression is driven by) a promoter selected from T7, SPC6, CMV, or a functional fragment of any of the foregoing.
In a thirteenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the nucleic acid includes a sequence downstream of the self-replicating RNA for producing a functional 3′ UTR.
In a fourteenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the thirteenth embodiment, wherein the sequence for producing a functional 3′ UTR encodes a ribozyme. Ribozymes are RNA-cleaving RNA sequences. Ribozymes useful in the invention cleave the self-replicating RNAs provided by the invention to retain function of the self-replicating RNA, e.g., by retaining functional 3′ UTR sequences, i.e., sequence such cyclization sequences recognized by viral proteins and necessary for virus formation. In some particular embodiments, the invention provides a nucleic acid that encodes a ribozyme useful in producing naturally occurring 3′ UTRs.
In a fifteenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the fourteenth embodiment, wherein the ribozyme is a Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) ribozyme or a functional mutant thereof. A “functional mutant” of HDV ribozyme, or any other ribozyme useful in the invention, contains nucleotide substitutions, but retains functionality, e.g., by also mutating the nucleotide it base pairs with in the tertiary structure to preserve tertiary base pairings.
In a sixteenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the thirteenth embodiment, wherein the downstream sequence is a restriction enzyme recognition sequence, such as, e.g., a BspQI site.
In a seventeenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, the nucleic acid comprises a sequence at least about: 60, 65, 60, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 or 99.9% identical to SEQ ID NO: 1 or 3.
In an eighteenth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the nucleic acid is a plasmid, optionally wherein the plasmid is a low-copy number plasmid. Exemplary low-copy number plasmids include p15A origin of replication-containing plasmids (e.g., pACYC (from NEB), pACNR (derived from pACYC177 from NEB, see Bredenbeek et al., J. Gen. Virol. 84: 1261-68 (2003))), BR322 origin of replication-containing plasmids (e.g., pBR322, from SIGMA), SC101 origin of replication-containing plasmids (e.g., pSC101 (from ATCC)), and the like.
In a related aspect, the invention also provides a host cell comprising a nucleic acid provided by the invention.
Thus, in a nineteenth embodiment, the invention provides a host cell comprising the nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments; optionally wherein the host is selected from XL10Gold® ultracompetent cells (TetrΔ(mcrA)183 Δ(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac Hte [F′ proAB lacIqZΔM15 Tn10 (Tetr) Amy Camr] cells) and STELLAR cells (F-, endA1, supE44, thi-1, recA1, relA1, gyrA96, phoA, ϕ80d lacZΔ M15, Δ (lacZYA-argF) U169, Δ (mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC), ΔmcrA, λ-cells).
In another related aspect the invention provides self-replicating RNAs, e.g., as encoded by any of the nucleic acids provided by the invention or as may be expressed (e.g., transcribed) from any nucleic acid provided by the invention. In a twentieth embodiment, the invention provides a self-replicating RNA encoded by the nucleic acid of any one of the preceding embodiments. In some other embodiments, the invention provides a self-replicating RNA comprising a sequence encoding a flavivirus replicase and a heterologous protein-coding sequence, the heterologous protein coding sequence being disposed between at least two flanking separation sequences, the self-replicating RNA lacking viral structural proteins capable of forming viral particles.
In a twenty-first embodiment, the invention provides a self-replicating RNA comprising a sequence encoding a flavivirus replicase and a heterologous protein-coding sequence, the heterologous protein coding sequence being disposed between at least two flanking separation sequences, the self-replicating RNA lacking viral structural proteins capable of forming viral particles.
In a twenty-second embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the heterologous protein coding sequence is an antigenic protein.
In a twenty-third embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to the twenty-second embodiment, wherein the antigenic protein, when administered to a mammalian subject, raises an immune response to a pathogen, optionally wherein the pathogen is bacterial, viral, fungal, protozoan, or cancerous, optionally more particularly wherein the antigenic protein is expressed on the outer surface of the pathogen.
In a twenty-fourth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of first to twenty-first embodiments, wherein the heterologous protein coding sequence is a therapeutic protein, optionally wherein the therapeutic protein is selected from a growth factor, cytokine, antibody, or antigen-binding fragment of an antibody.
In a twenty-fifth embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid according to any one of previous embodiments, wherein the nucleic acid is complexed with a delivery system, optionally wherein the delivery system is selected from a viral replicon particle (VRP), a lipid nanoparticle (LNP), a cationic nanoemulsion, or a biodegradeable polymer.
In a twenty-sixth embodiment, the invention provides a composition comprising the nucleic acid of any one of the preceding embodiments.
In a twenty-seventh embodiment, the invention provides a composition according to the twenty-sixth embodiment, wherein the nucleic acid is the nucleic acid the twenty, further comprising an adjuvant; optionally wherein the adjuvant is a metal salt.
In a twenty-eighth embodiment, the invention provides a composition according to the twenty-sixth or twenty-seventh embodiment, further comprising a TLR agonist; optionally wherein the TLR agonist is a TLR7 agonist; further optionally wherein the TLR7 agonist is a benzonapthyridine compound.
In a twenty-ninth embodiment, the invention provides a method of expressing a protein of interest, or a nucleic acid encoding the protein of interest, comprising contacting a nucleic acid of any one of the preceding claims with an expression system comprising transcriptional machinery, translational machinery, or transcriptional machinery and translational machinery, wherein the heterologous protein-coding sequence of the nucleic acid is the protein of interest.
In a thirtieth embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the twenty-ninth embodiment, wherein the expression system is a cell-free in vitro transcription system; optionally wherein the nucleic acid is a DNA sequence encoding the self-replicating RNA.
In a thirty-first embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the twenty-ninth embodiment, wherein the expression system comprises a translation system, optionally wherein the nucleic acid is the self-replicating RNA.
In a thirty-second embodiment, the invention provides a method according to any one of twenty-ninth to thirty-first embodiments, wherein the expression system is a eukaryotic cell.
In a thirty-third embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the thirty-second embodiment, wherein the eukaryotic cell is an insect cell.
In a thirty-fourth embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the thirty-second embodiment, wherein the eukaryotic cell is a mammalian cell.
In a thirty-fifth embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the thirty-fourth embodiment, wherein the mammalian cell is a CHO or COS cell.
In a thirty-sixth embodiment, the invention provides a method of raising an immune response to an antigenic protein in a mammalian subject, comprising administering the nucleic acid of the twenty-second embodiment to the subject.
In a thirty-seventh embodiment, the invention provides a method of administering a therapeutic protein to a mammalian subject, comprising administering the nucleic acid to the subject.
In a thirty-eighth embodiment, the invention provides a method according to the thirty-sixth or thirty-seventh embodiments, wherein the mammalian subject is a human.
Programs useful for sequence alignments and comparisons include FASTA (Lipman and Pearson, Science, 227: 1435-41 (1985) and Lipman and Pearson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 2444-48), BLAST (McGinnis & Madden, Nucleic Acids Res., 32:W20-W25 (2004) (current BLAST reference, describing, inter alia, MegaBlast); Zhang et al., J. Comput. 7(1-2):203-14 (2000) (describing the “greedy algorithm” implemented in MegaBlast); Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410 (1990) (original BLAST publication)), Needleman-Wunsch (Needleman and Wunsch, J. Molec. Bio., 48 (3): 443-53(1970)), Sellers (Sellers, Bull. Math. Biol., 46:501-14 (1984), and Smith-Waterman (Smith and Waterman, J. Molec. Bio., 147: 195-197 (1981)), and other algorithms (including those described in Gerhard et Genome Res., 14(10b):2121-27 (2004)), which are incorporated by reference.
“Transcriptional machinery” will produce RNA transcripts in the presence of a suitable DNA sequence, e.g., promoter sequences, polymerase-binding sites, et cetera. Transcriptional machinery can include whole cells, organisms, or in vitro systems.
“Translational machinery” will produce polypeptides in the presence of a suitable RNA sequence, e.g., ribosome binding sites, et cetera. Translational machinery can include whole cells, organisms, or in vitro systems.
A “separation sequence(s)”: facilitates a single transcript forming two or more polypeptides. Exemplary separation sequences include viral 2A sequences, IRES (internal ribosomal entry sites), signal sequences, and protease recognition sites. Exemplary viral 2A sequences include (optionally with or without linker sequences, such as GSG linkers): P2A, F2A, E2A, T2A, described in Table 1, picornavirus or sequences described in Szymczak-Workman et al. Cold Spring Harbor Protoc, 2012(2): 199-204 (2012), which is incorporated by reference. Exemplary IRES sequences are given in Table 2.
A self-replicating RNA “lacking viral structural proteins capable of forming viral particles” cannot, in the absence of complementary helper sequences, form mature viral particles (e.g., as evaluated by various techniques, such as crystal structure or electron microscopy, e.g., may lack full capsid protein encoding sequences). As used herein, however, a self-replicating RNA “lacking viral structural proteins capable of forming viral particles” can retain elements required to replicate the RNA; e.g., cyclization and signal sequences. Exemplary cyclization and signal sequences are described in Tables 3 and 4, and are further described in Khromykh et al., J. Virol. 75: 6719-28 (2001) and Hahn et al., J. Mol. Biol. 198: 33-41 (1987), both of which are incorporated by reference. For example, for WNV the N-terminal coding region of protein C (nt. 97-189, referring to reference accession no. EF530047); the corresponding RNA sequence is an essential cis-acting element and may play a role in the regulation of minus-sense RNA synthesis. The C-terminal coding sequence of E protein (nt. 2380-2469 referring to reference accession no. EF530047) was preserved as this region acts as a signal sequence guiding the translocation and processing of non-structural protein 1 (NS1) and subsequently the remaining non-structural proteins NS2-NS5. These deletions render WNV non-infectious but replication competent. Similar deletions can be performed for other flavivirus replicons, such as a YFV replicon.
Heterologous Protein Coding Sequences
In a thirty-ninth embodiment, the invention provides a method of administration (e.g., to a host, such as a mammalian subject), whereby the self-replicating RNA is translated in vivo and the heterologous protein-coding sequence is expressed and, e.g., can elicit an immune response to the heterologous protein-coding sequence in the recipient or provide a therapeutic effect, where the heterologous protein-coding sequence is a therapeutic protein.
Immunogenic Proteins
In a fortieth embodiment, the invention provides a heterologous protein coding sequence of any of the preceding aspects and embodiments, wherein the heterologous protein coding sequence is an antigenic protein or immunogen, which terms will be used interchangeably.
In a forty-first embodiment, the antigenic protein of the fortieth embodiment, when administered to a mammalian subject, raises an immune response to a pathogen, optionally wherein the pathogen is bacterial, viral, fungal, protozoan, or cancerous. In some more particular embodiments, the antigenic protein is expressed on the outer surface of the pathogen; while in other more particular embodiments, the antigen may be a non-surface antigen, e.g., useful as a T-cell epitope. The immunogen may elicit an immune response against a pathogen (e.g. a bacterium, a virus, a fungus or a parasite) but, in some other embodiments, it elicits an immune response against an allergen or a tumor antigen. The immune response may comprise an antibody response (usually including IgG) and/or a cell mediated immune response. The polypeptide immunogen will typically elicit an immune response that recognises the corresponding pathogen (or allergen or tumor) polypeptide, but in some embodiments, the polypeptide may act as a mimotope to elicit an immune response that recognises a saccharide. The immunogen will typically be a surface polypeptide e.g. an adhesin, a hemagglutinin, an envelope glycoprotein, a spike glycoprotein, etc.
The RNA molecule can encode a single polypeptide immunogen or multiple polypeptides. Multiple immunogens can be presented as a single polypeptide immunogen (fusion polypeptide) or as separate polypeptides. If immunogens are expressed as separate polypeptides from a replicon then one or more of these may be provided with an upstream IRES or an additional viral promoter element. Alternatively, multiple immunogens may be expressed from a polyprotein that encodes individual immunogens fused to a short autocatalytic protease (e.g. foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A protein), or as inteins.
In a forty-second embodiment, polypeptide immunogens (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more immunogens) of the fortieth or forty-first embodiment may be used, either alone or together with a RNA molecule, such as a self-replicating RNA, encoding one or more immunogens (either the same or different as the polypeptide immunogens).
In a forty-third embodiment, the immunogen of the of the fortieth, forty-first or forty-second embodiment elicits an immune response against one of these bacteria:
Neisseria meningitidis: useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, membrane proteins such as adhesins, autotransporters, toxins, iron acquisition proteins, and factor H binding protein. A combination of three useful polypeptides is disclosed in Giuliani et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(29):10834-9 (2006).
Streptococcus pneumoniae: useful polypeptide immunogens are disclosed in WO2009/016515. These include, but are not limited to, the RrgB pilus subunit, the beta-N-acetyl-hexosaminidase precursor (spr0057), spr0096, General stress protein GSP-781 (spr2021, SP2216), serine/threonine kinase StkP (SP1732), and pneumococcal surface adhesin PsaA.
Streptococcus pyogenes: useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in WO02/34771 and WO2005/032582.
Moraxella catarrhalis.
Bordetella pertussis: Useful pertussis immunogens include, but are not limited to, pertussis toxin or toxoid (PT), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin, and agglutinogens 2 and 3.
Staphylococcus aureus: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in WO2010/119343, such as a haemolysin, esxA, esxB, ferrichrome-binding protein (sta006) and/or the sta011 lipoprotein.
Clostridium tetani: the typical immunogen is tetanus toxoid.
Cornynebacterium diphtheriae: the typical immunogen is diphtheria toxoid.
Haemophilus influenzae: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in WO2006/110413 and WO2005/111066.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Streptococcus agalactiae: useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in WO02/34771.
Chlamydia trachomatis: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, PepA, LcrE, ArtJ, DnaK, CT398, OmpH-like, L7/L12, OmcA, AtoS, CT547, Eno, HtrA and MurG (e.g. as disclosed in WO2005/002619). LcrE (WO2006/138004) and HtrA (WO2009/109860) are two preferred immunogens.
Chlamydia pneumoniae: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in WO02/02606.
Helicobacter pylori: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, CagA, VacA, NAP, and/or urease (WO03/018054).
Escherichia coli: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, immunogens derived from enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAggEC), diffusely adhering E. coli (DAEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and/or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). ExPEC strains include uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and meningitis/sepsis-associated E. coli (MNEC). Useful UPEC immunogens are disclosed in WO 2006/091517 (Chiron Corp.) and WO 2008/020330 (Novartis AG). Useful MNEC immunogens are disclosed in WO 2006/089264 (Chiron Corp.). A useful immunogen for several E. coli types is AcfD. See, WO 2009/104092 (Novartis AG).
Bacillus anthracis
Yersinia pestis: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited to, those disclosed in WO2007/049155 and WO2009/031043.
Staphylococcus epidermis
Clostridium perfringens or Clostridium botulinums
Legionella pneumophila
Coxiella burnetii
Brucella, such as B. abortus, B. canis, B. melitensis, B. neotomae, B. ovis, B. suis, B. pinnipediae.
Francisella, such as F. novicida, F. philomiragia, F. tularensis.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Treponema pallidum
Haemophilus ducreyi
Enterococcus faecalis or Enterococcus faecium
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Yersinia enterocolitica
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Rickettsia
Listeria monocytogenes
Vibrio cholerae
Salmonella typhi
Borrelia burgdorferi
Porphyromonas gingivalis
Klebsiella
In a forty-fourth embodiment, the immunogen elicits an immune response against one of these viruses:
Orthomyxovirus: Useful immunogens can be from an influenza A, B or C virus, such as the hemagglutinin, neuraminidase or matrix M2 proteins. Where the immunogen is an influenza A virus hemagglutinin it may be from any subtype e.g. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15 or H16.
Paramyxoviridae viruses: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Pneumoviruses (e.g. respiratory syncytial virus, RSV), Rubulaviruses (e.g. mumps virus), Paramyxoviruses (e.g. parainfluenza virus), Metapneumoviruses and Morbilliviruses (e.g. measles virus).
Poxviridae: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Orthopoxvirus such as Variola vera, including but not limited to, Variola major and Variola minor.
Picornavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Picornaviruses, such as Enteroviruses, Rhinoviruses, Heparnavirus, Cardioviruses and Aphthoviruses. In one embodiment, the enterovirus is a poliovirus e.g. a type 1, type 2 and/or type 3 poliovirus. In another embodiment, the enterovirus is an EV71 enterovirus. In another embodiment, the enterovirus is a coxsackie A or B virus.
Bunyavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from an Orthobunyavirus, such as California encephalitis virus, a Phlebovirus, such as Rift Valley Fever virus, or a Nairovirus, such as Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus.
Heparnavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Heparnavirus, such as hepatitis A virus (HAV).
Filovirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a filovirus, such as an Ebola virus (including a Zaire, Ivory Coast, Reston or Sudan ebolavirus) or a Marburg virus.
Togavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Togavirus, such as a Rubivirus, an Alphavirus, or an Arterivirus. This includes rubella virus.
Flavivirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Flavivirus, such as Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, Dengue (types 1, 2, 3 or 4) virus, Yellow Fever virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Kyasanur Forest Virus, West Nile encephalitis virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Russian spring-summer encephalitis virus, Powassan encephalitis virus.
Pestivirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Pestivirus, such as Bovine viral diarrhea (BVDV), Classical swine fever (CSFV) or Border disease (BDV).
Hepadnavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Hepadnavirus, such as Hepatitis B virus. A composition can include hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg).
Other hepatitis viruses: A composition can include an immunogen from a hepatitis C virus, delta hepatitis virus, hepatitis E virus, or hepatitis G virus.
Rhabdovirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a Rhabdovirus, such as a Lyssavirus (e.g. a Rabies virus) and Vesiculovirus (VSV).
Caliciviridae: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Calciviridae, such as Norwalk virus (Norovirus), and Norwalk-like Viruses, such as Hawaii Virus and Snow Mountain Virus.
Coronavirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a SARS coronavirus, avian infectious bronchitis (IBV), Mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), and Porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). The coronavirus immunogen may be a spike polypeptide.
Retrovirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from an Oncovirus, a Lentivirus (e.g. HIV-1 or HIV-2) or a Spumavirus.
Reovirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from an Orthoreovirus, a Rotavirus, an Orbivirus, or a Coltivirus.
Parvovirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Parvovirus B19.
Herpesvirus: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from a human herpesvirus, such as, by way of example only, Herpes Simplex Viruses (HSV) (e.g. HSV types 1 and 2), Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Human Herpesvirus 7 (HHV7), and Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV8).
Papovaviruses: immunogens include, but are not limited to, those derived from Papillomaviruses and Polyomaviruses. The (human) papillomavirus may be of serotype 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42, 47, 51, 57, 58, 63 or 65 e.g. from one or more of serotypes 6, 11, 16 and/or 18.
Adenovirus: immunogens include those derived from serotype 36 (Ad-36).
In some embodiments, the immunogen elicits an immune response against a virus which infects fish, such as: infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV), salmon pancreatic disease virus (SPDV), infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), channel catfish virus (CCV), fish lymphocystis disease virus (FLDV), infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV), koi herpesvirus, salmon picorna-like virus (also known as picorna-like virus of Atlantic salmon), landlocked salmon virus (LSV), Atlantic salmon rotavirus (ASR), trout strawberry disease virus (TSD), coho salmon tumor virus (CSTV), or viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV).
Fungal immunogens may be derived from Dermatophytres, including: Epidermophyton floccusum, Microsporum audouini, Microsporum canis, Microsporum distortum, Microsporum equinum, Microsporum gypsum, Microsporum nanum, Trichophyton concentricum, Trichophyton equinum, Trichophyton gallinae, Trichophyton gypseum, Trichophyton megnini, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton quinckeanum, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton schoenleini, Trichophyton tonsurans, Trichophyton verrucosum, T. verrucosum var. album, var. discoides, var. ochraceum, Trichophyton violaceum, and/or Trichophyton faviforme; or from Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus sydowii, Aspergillus flavatus, Aspergillus glaucus, Blastoschizomyces capitatus, Candida albicans, Candida enolase, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida stellatoidea, Candida kusei, Candida parakwsei, Candida lusitaniae, Candida pseudotropicalis, Candida guilliermondi, Cladosporium carrionii, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatidis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Geotrichum clavatum, Histoplasma capsulatum, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microsporidia, Encephalitozoon spp., Septata intestinalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi; the less common are Brachiola spp, Microsporidium spp., Nosema spp., Pleistophora spp., Trachipleistophora spp., Vittaforma spp Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Pneumocystis carinii, Pythiumn insidiosum, Pityrosporum ovale, Sacharomyces cerevisae, Saccharomyces boulardii, Saccharomyces pombe, Scedosporium apiosperum, Sporothrix schenckii, Trichosporon beigelii, Toxoplasma Penicillium marneffei, Malassezia spp., Fonsecaea spp., Wangiella spp., Sporothrix spp., Basidiobolus spp., Conidiobolus spp., Rhizopus spp, Mucor spp, Absidia spp, Mortierella spp, Cunninghamella spp, Saksenaea spp., Alternaria spp, Curvularia spp, Helminthosporium spp, Fusarium spp, Aspergillus spp, Penicillium spp, Monolinia spp, Rhizoctonia spp, Paecilomyces spp, Pithomyces spp, and Cladosporium spp.
In a forty-fifth embodiment, the immunogen elicits an immune response against a parasite from the Plasmodium genus, such as P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae or P. ovale. Thus, the invention may be used for immunising against malaria. In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immune response against a parasite from the Caligidae family, particularly those from the Lepeophtheirus and Caligus genera e.g. sea lice such as Lepeophtheirus salmonis or Caligus rogercresseyi.
In a forty-sixth embodiment, the immunogen elicits an immune response against: pollen allergens (tree-, herb, weed-, and grass pollen allergens); insect or arachnid allergens (inhalant, saliva and venom allergens, e.g. mite allergens, cockroach and midges allergens, hymenopthera venom allergens); animal hair and dandruff allergens (from e.g. dog, cat, horse, rat, mouse, etc.); and food allergens (e.g. a gliadin). Important pollen allergens from trees, grasses and herbs are such originating from the taxonomic orders of Fagales, Oleales, Pinales and platanaceae including, but not limited to, birch (Betula), alder (Alnus), hazel (Corylus), hornbeam (Carpinus) and olive (Olea), cedar (Cryptomeria and Juniperus), plane tree (Platanus), the order of Poales including grasses of the genera Lolium, Phleum, Poa, Cynodon, Dactylis, Holcus, Phalaris, Secale, and Sorghum, the orders of Asterales and Urticales including herbs of the genera Ambrosia, Artemisia, and Parietaria. Other important inhalation allergens are those from house dust mites of the genus Dermatophagoides and Euroglyphus, storage mite e.g. Lepidoglyphys, Glycyphagus and Tyrophagus, those from cockroaches, midges and fleas e.g. Blatella, Periplaneta, Chironomus and Ctenocepphalides, and those from mammals such as cat, dog and horse, venom allergens including such originating from stinging or biting insects such as those from the taxonomic order of Hymenoptera including bees (Apidae), wasps (Vespidea), and ants (Formicoidae).
In a forty-seventh embodiment, the immunogen is a tumor antigen selected from: (a) cancer-testis antigens such as NY-ESO-1, SSX2, SCP1 as well as RAGE, BAGE, GAGE and MAGE family polypeptides, for example, GAGE-1, GAGE-2, MAGE-1, MAGE-2, MAGE-3, MAGE-4, MAGE-5, MAGE-6, and MAGE-12 (which can be used, for example, to address melanoma, lung, head and neck, NSCLC, breast, gastrointestinal, and bladder tumors; (b) mutated antigens, for example, p53 (associated with various solid tumors, e.g., colorectal, lung, head and neck cancer), p21/Ras (associated with, e.g., melanoma, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer), CDK4 (associated with, e.g., melanoma), MUM1 (associated with, e.g., melanoma), caspase-8 (associated with, e.g., head and neck cancer), CIA 0205 (associated with, e.g., bladder cancer), HLA-A2-R1701, beta catenin (associated with, e.g., melanoma), TCR (associated with, e.g., T-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma), BCR-abl (associated with, e.g., chronic myelogenous leukemia), triosephosphate isomerase, KIA 0205, CDC-27, and LDLR-FUT; (c) over-expressed antigens, for example, Galectin 4 (associated with, e.g., colorectal cancer), Galectin 9 (associated with, e.g., Hodgkin's disease), proteinase 3 (associated with, e.g., chronic myelogenous leukemia), WT 1 (associated with, e.g., various leukemias), carbonic anhydrase (associated with, e.g., renal cancer), aldolase A (associated with, e.g., lung cancer), PRAME (associated with, e.g., melanoma), HER-2/neu (associated with, e.g., breast, colon, lung and ovarian cancer), mammaglobin, alpha-fetoprotein (associated with, e.g., hepatoma), KSA (associated with, e.g., colorectal cancer), gastrin (associated with, e.g., pancreatic and gastric cancer), telomerase catalytic protein, MUC-1 (associated with, e.g., breast and ovarian cancer), G-250 (associated with, e.g., renal cell carcinoma), p53 (associated with, e.g., breast, colon cancer), and carcinoembryonic antigen (associated with, e.g., breast cancer, lung cancer, and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract such as colorectal cancer); (d) shared antigens, for example, melanoma-melanocyte differentiation antigens such as MART-1/Melan A, gp100, MC1R, melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor, tyrosinase, tyrosinase related protein-1/TRP1 and tyrosinase related protein-2/TRP2 (associated with, e.g., melanoma); (e) prostate associated antigens such as PAP, PSA, PSMA, PSH-P1, PSM-P1, PSM-P2, associated with e.g., prostate cancer; (f) immunoglobulin idiotypes (associated with myeloma and B cell lymphomas, for example). In certain embodiments, tumor immunogens include, but are not limited to, p15, Hom/Mel-40, H-Ras, E2A-PRL, H4-RET, IGH-IGK, MYL-RAR, Epstein Barr virus antigens, EBNA, human papillomavirus (HPV) antigens, including E6 and E7, hepatitis B and C virus antigens, human T-cell lymphotropic virus antigens, TSP-180, p185erbB2, p180erbB-3, c-met, mn-23H1, TAG-72-4, CA 19-9, CA 72-4, CAM 17.1, NuMa, K-ras, p16, TAGE, PSCA, CT7, 43-9F, 5T4, 791 Tgp72, beta-HCG, BCA225, BTAA, CA 125, CA 15-3 (CA 27.29\BCAA), CA 195, CA 242, CA-50, CAM43, CD68\KP1, CO-029, FGF-5, Ga733 (EpCAM), HTgp-175, M344, MA-50, MG7-Ag, MOV18, NB/70K, NY-CO-1, RCAS1, SDCCAG16, TA-90 (Mac-2 binding protein/cyclophilin C-associated protein), TAAL6, TAG72, TLP, TPS, and the like.
Therapeutic Proteins
In a forty-eight embodiment, heterologous protein coding sequence of any of the preceding aspects and embodiments is a therapeutic protein, optionally wherein the therapeutic protein is selected from a growth factor, cytokine, antibody, or antigen-binding fragment of an antibody.
“Antibody,” as used herein, refers to an immunoglobulin or a part thereof, and encompasses any polypeptide comprising an antigen-binding site regardless of the source, species of origin, method of production, and characteristics. As a non-limiting example, the term “antibody” includes human, orangutan, mouse, rat, goat, sheep, and chicken antibodies. The term includes but is not limited to polyclonal, monoclonal, monospecific, polyspecific, non-specific, humanized, camelized, single-chain, chimeric, synthetic, recombinant, hybrid, mutated, and CDR-grafted antibodies. For the purposes of the present invention, it also includes, unless otherwise stated, antibody fragments such as Fab, F(ab′)2, Fv, scFv, Fd, dAb, VHH (also referred to as nanobodies), and other antibody fragments that retain the antigen-binding function. Antibodies also refers to antigen-binding molecules that are not based on immunoglobulins, as further described below.
Antibodies can be made, for example, via traditional hybridoma techniques (Kohler and Milstein, Nature 256: 495-499 (1975)), recombinant DNA methods (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567), or phage display techniques using antibody libraries (Clackson et al., Nature 352: 624-628 (1991); Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol. 222: 581-597 (1991)). For various other antibody production techniques, see Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, eds. Harlow et al., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1988.
The term “antigen-binding domain” refers to the part of an antibody molecule that comprises the area specifically binding to or complementary to a part or all of an antigen. Where an antigen is large, an antibody may only bind to a particular part of the antigen. The “epitope” or “antigenic determinant” is a portion of an antigen molecule that is responsible for specific interactions with the antigen-binding domain of an antibody. An antigen-binding domain may be provided by one or more antibody variable domains (e.g., a so-called Fd antibody fragment consisting of a VH domain). An antigen-binding domain can comprise an antibody light chain variable region (VL) and an antibody heavy chain variable region (VH). Antibodies from camels and llamas (Camelidae, camelids) include a unique kind of antibody, which is formed by heavy chains only and is devoid of light chains. The antigen-binding site of such antibodies is one single domain, referred to as VHH. These have been termed “camelized antibodies” or “nanobodies”. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,800,988 and 6,005,079 and International Application Publication Nos. WO 94/04678 and WO 94/25591, which are incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the “antibody” includes an antigen-binding molecule based on a scaffold other than an immunoglobulin. For example, non-immunoglobulin scaffolds known in the art include small modular immunopharmaceuticals (see, e.g., U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 20080181892 and 20080227958 published Jul. 31, 2008 and Sep. 18, 2008, respectively), tetranectins, fibronectin domains (e.g., AdNectins, see U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0082365, published Apr. 12, 2007), protein A, lipocalins (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,118,915), ankyrin repeats, and thioredoxin. Molecules based on non-immunoglobulin scaffolds are generally produced by in vitro selection of libraries by phage display (see, e.g., Hoogenboom, Method Mol. Biol. 178:1-37 (2002)), ribosome display (see, e.g., Hanes et al., FEBS Lett. 450:105-110 (1999) and He and Taussig, J. Immunol. Methods 297:73-82 (2005)), or other techniques known in the art (see also Binz et al., Nat. Biotech. 23:1257-68 (2005); Rothe et al., FASEB J. 20:1599-1610 (2006); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,270,950; 6,518,018; and 6,281,344) to identify high-affinity binding sequences.
Delivery Systems
Nucleic acids provided by the invention can be delivered by any suitable means. They may be delivered naked, in an aqueous solution (such as a buffer), or with a delivery system, such as an adjuvant delivery system. Accordingly, in another aspect, a nucleic acid provided by the invention may be complexed with a delivery system. Exemplary delivery systems include a viral replicon particle (VRP), a lipid nanoparticle (LNP), a cationic nanoemulsion (CNE), or a biodegradeable polymer. Useful delivery systems for the nucleic acids provided by the invention are described in, inter alia, for CNEs, published International patent applications WO 2012/006380, WO 2013/006837, WO 2013/006834. For LNPs, see WO 2012/006378, WO 2012/030901, WO 2012/031046, WO 2012/031043, WO 2013/033563, WO 2013/006825, WO 2011/076807, WO 2015/095340 (Novaais AG) and WO 2015/095346 (Novartis AG). For other modalities, see WO 2012/006359 or WO 2012/006376. All of the forgoing applications are incorporated by reference.
Compositions
In another aspect, the invention provides compositions comprising any nucleic acid provided by the invention, such as pharmaceutical compositions, e.g., suitable for administration to a subject, such as a human subject. Such pharmaceutical compositions may comprise suitable excipients known to the skilled artisan. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid is a self-replicating RNA provided by the invention. In some more particular embodiments, the composition further comprises an adjuvant, such as a metal salt.
In a forty-ninth embodiment, any of the compositions provided by the invention may further comprise a TLR agonist, such as a TLR7 agonist, such as a benzonapthyridine compound. TLR agonists, and formulations containing them are known in the art and are described in, inter alia, WO 2009/111337, WO 2011/049677, WO 2011/027222, WO 2011/084549, WO2012/031140, WO2013/131985, WO2012/103421, which are all incorporated by reference.
Methods of Use
In another aspect, the invention provides methods of expressing a protein of interest, or a nucleic acid encoding the protein of interest. These methods include the steps of contacting a nucleic acid provided by the invention with an expression system comprising transcriptional machinery, translational machinery, or transcriptional machinery and translational machinery, wherein the heterologous protein coding sequence of the nucleic acid is the protein of interest. In some embodiments, the expression system is a cell-free in vitro transcription system, optionally wherein the nucleic acid is a DNA sequence encoding the self-replicating RNA. In other embodiments, the expression system comprises a translation system, e.g., where the nucleic acid provided by the invention is a self-replicating RNA provided by the invention.
In a fiftieth embodiment, the expression system is a eukaryotic cell. In more particular embodiments, the eukaryotic cell is an insect cell. In other particular embodiments, the eukaryotic cell is a mammalian cell, such as a CHO cell or a COS cell.
In another aspect, the invention provides methods of raising an immune response to an antigenic protein in a mammalian subject, comprising administering a self-replicating RNA provided by the invention to the subject, where the self-replicating RNA encodes the immunogen.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides methods of administering a therapeutic protein to a mammalian subject, comprising administering a self-replicating RNA provided by the invention to the subject, wherein the self-replicating RNA encodes the therapeutic protein.
In certain particular embodiments of the methods provided by the invention, the mammalian subject is a human.
Initial Flavivirus Replicon Design and Evaluation
A first generation West Nile Virus (WNV) replicon was constructed from the sequence of WNV Strain 3356 (GenBank: AF404756.1). Shi P. Y., Tilgner M., Lo M., “Construction and Characterization of Subgenomic Replicons of New York Strain of West Nile Virus.” Virology 296: 213-233 (2002). The WNV sequence, including the nt. 90-2379 deletion, was ordered in three fragments from Genewiz and assembled into a low-copy, p15A origin of replication vector using traditional cloning methods with a traditional T7 promoter sequence upstream of the WNV replicon sequence yielding WNV001 (
A Yellow Fever vVrus (YFV) replicon was constructed using similar principles and based on the sequence of YFV 17D vaccine strain (GenBank: X15062.1) to yield replicon Y030. The YFV replicon contains structural gene deletions rendering it non-infectious but replication competent. The coding region corresponding to the 25 N-terminal amino acids of protein C and the 24 C-terminal amino acids of protein E were preserved to retain elements necessary for replicon function, similar to the WNV replicon. (
WNV001 replicon RNA was functionally evaluated via electroporation into baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells followed by staining for the presence of WNV antigen using immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Replicon RNA from a non-infectious, vaccine strain of Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE; see Geall, A. J. et. al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(36): 140604-14609 (2012)) expressing WNV-NS1 (A609) was used as a positive control. IHC was performed 48 hr post-electroporation using WNV hyperimmune mouse ascites fluid as the primary antibody (a gift from R.B. Tesh) and horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM (H+L) as a secondary antibody. Positive cells were identified by a blue residue left upon reacting with TrueBlue peroxidase substrate. As expected, cells electroporated with A609 demonstrated a strongly IHC positive signal, however, less than 1% of cells electroporated with WNV001 demonstrated an IHC positive signal (
Flow-cytometry was used to evaluate function of the yellow fever replicon via electroporation of 1 μg Y030 RNA into BHK cells followed by staining for the presence of YFV antigen. Cells were harvested 24 hr post-electroporation and stained using YFV hyperimmune mouse ascites fluid as the primary antibody (a gift from R.B. Tesh) and allophycocyanin (APC) conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a. Positive cells were identified by fluorescence using the APC channel during flow-cytometric analysis. (
Hepatitis Delta Virus Ribozymes Enhance WNV Replicon Potency but not YFV Replicon Potency
Results with the first generation WNV001 replicon demonstrated poor potency (defined as the percent of cells expressing antigen or a reporter gene post-electroporation or transfection). To improve the potency of the replicon, sense or anti-sense hepatitis delta virus sequences (S-HDVR or AS-HDVR respectively) were added immediately downstream of the 3′UTR of WNV001, yielding second-generation replicons WNV006 and WNV007 containing the S-HDVR or AS-HDVR, respectively (
Replicon RNA of WNV001, WNV006, and WNV007 was evaluated in BHK cells using flow-cytometry. A range of WNV001, WNV006, or WNV007 RNA (0.25 μg to 4 μg) was electroporated into BHK cells and 24 hr post electroporation, cells were stained with WNV hyperimmune mouse ascites fluid and allophycocyanin (APC) conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (
We tested whether YFV RNA potency was further improved with the addition of a HDV-R sequence following the 3′UTR based on the results obtained using WNV replicons. The ribozyme was added directly after the 3′ UTR of Y037 (based on Y030 with a GFP reporter) generating Y040. (
We tested whether the mechanism by which the addition of a ribozyme sequence improves potency of the WNV replicon is that it facilitates the development of a native 3′ UTR after in vitro transcription. This was evaluated this by comparing RNA generated from the following templates: (1) XbaI linearized and exonuclease polished WNV001, (2) PCR generated WNV001 template, and (3) Ribozyme containing XbaI linearized WNV006. Theoretically, all templates used to generate WNV replicon RNA yield the same sequence, however, the potency of RNA generated with the assistance of the ribozymes greatly outperformed that of RNA generated from the XbaI, exonuclease polished or PCR generated templates. See
In vitro transcription of WNV replicon RNA using XbaI linearized and exonuclease polished WNV001 or PCR generated WNV001 template may suffer from poor potency as many transcripts may contain non-native 3′ ends due to aberrant addition of non-templated nucleotides; transcripts without a native end may be functionally impaired or nonfunctional. The addition of a ribozyme facilitates the development of precisely defined, native 3′ ends perhaps explaining the superiority of WNV replicon RNA generated using this method.
The addition of HDV-R to yellow fever replicons did not have the same effect, however, the YFV replicon had a markedly high potency to begin with compared to WNV (e.g., 1 μg of YFV replicon RNA electroporated into BHK cells typically yields 60-70% YFV antigen positive cells compared to 4 μg of WNV001 or WNV006 replicon RNA yielding ˜1.5% to ˜9% WNV antigen positive cells respectively). Thus, the the 3′ UTR of YFV replicon RNA was already effectively optimized without additional modifications.
5′ ATP-Initiated Promoters Improve Flavivirus Replicon Potency
The results from the second-generation WNV replicons suggested that addition of the ribozyme aids in the generation of an authentic 3′ end of the replicon RNA during in vitro transcription. We tested whether the WNV replicon potency was further enhanced through modifications that would facilitate the development of authentic 5′ end of the replicon RNA. Thus far, a traditional T7 class III phi 6.5 promoter was used to drive transcription of WNV replicon RNA; this promoter is GTP-initiated, leading to the addition of one extra, non-viral guanosine to the 5′ end of the replicon RNA. It has been demonstrated that flavivirus virus recovery is low when genomic viral RNA containing the extra guanosine nucleotide from transcription using a traditional T7 class III phi 6.5 promoter was used. Furthermore, the 5′ end of replicon RNA is being corrected during its replication in cells to revert to the authentic sequence. See, e.g., Khromykh and Westaway, J Virol, 68(7): p. 4580-8 (1994).
To facilitate the production of WNV replicon RNA with a correct 5′ end, a series of alternative T7 promoters that drive ATP-initiated transcription was generated by modifying the promoter of WNV008 (based on WNV006 but with a silent mutation between C* and E* to develop an AflII cloning site), yielding WNV replicons WNV017, WNV026, WNV027, and WNV028 (
Promoter modifications were first tested to determine if they were detrimental to transcription efficiency compared to the previously used T7 promoter driving transcription of WNV008. phi 2.5 and phi 6.5 mutant promoters used in WNV017 and WNV026, respectively, severely reduced RNA yield in in vitro transcription, but phi 2.5 (OL) and phi 6.5 mut (OL) promoters used in WNV027 and WNV028, respectively, did not have a significant detrimental effect on RNA yield (
The effects of using ATP-initiated, modified promoters was also evaluated in the YFV replicon system by modifying the promoter of Y037 (based on Y030 with a GFP reporter flanked by F2A and GSGP2A self-cleaving peptide sites derived from foot and mouth disease virus and porcine teschovirus, respectively). As preformed with WNV, promoter modifications were first tested to determine if they were detrimental to transcription efficiency of YFV replicons. Alternative promoters yielded 60% as much RNA compared to the traditional promoter (
Optimization of Transgene Expression Site
Two different strategies of developing heterologous gene expressing flavivirus replicons were evaluated. One strategy consists of inserting an EMCV IRES driven reporter gene in an upstream region of the 3′ UTR. The second strategy focused on adding the reporter gene as an in-frame replacement within the structural deleted region. Attempts to add IRES-driven reporter genes into upstream regions of the 3′UTR of WNV or YFV replicons yielded replicons with poor potency and expression of the inserted transgene. In contrast, reporter genes which were inserted in-frame into the structural-deleted deleted region of the replicons yielded potent replicons with higher expression of the reporter. See
Transgenes such as GFP with FLAG tag (GFP′FLAG), firefly luciferase (FLUC), and anti-YFV antibody fragments (scFv-hFc) were inserted into the structural deleted gene region of optimized WNV or YFV base replicons flanked by F2A and GSGP2A self-cleaving peptides (
Flavivirus Replicons have Alternate Characteristics Compared to Alphavirus Replicons.
The properties of WNV, YFV, and TC83 based replicons across various metrics using GFP expressing replicons in multiple cell lines were evaluated.
Replicon potency, cytotoxicity, and expression was determined in BHK or HeLa cells using cationic transfection reagents to better standardize transfection conditions when working with different cell lines. Briefly, 250 ng of replicon RNA from GFP expressing TC83, WNV, or YFV replicons (A750, WNV029, or Y042) were transfected onto a 80% confluent layer of BHK or HeLa cells using MIRUS mRNA transfection reagents (Mirus) in 6-well format. Supernatants and cell layers from each well were harvested at 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr time points and were stained using a far-red live/dead staining reagent (Molecular Probes) which penetrates into compromised membranes of pre-apoptotic and apoptotic cells. Using flow-cytometric analysis, replicon potency was determined using the live-cell population and determining the percentage of GFP+ cells to total live cells (
The potency results using BHK cells indicated that at 24 hr, the TC83-based replicon A750 was approximately equivalent in potency compared to WNV029. Y042 had a much lower potency than the other replicons. The data suggests that potency is retained by all three replicons in comparing 24 hr to 48 hr potency. In comparing potency at 48 hr to 72 hr, there was a drastic drop in potency in cells transfected with either the A750 or WNV029 replicon, but Y042 appears to still maintain potency at this time. Potency results using HeLa cells demonstrated that the WNV replicon is as potent as the TC83-based replicon, while the YFV-based replicon suffers from poor potency in HeLa cells. Additionally, the potency was better retained by WNV replicon transfected cells than TC83 replicon cells at 48 hr, but the potency dropped to approximately equal levels at 72 hr.
In BHK cells, the GFP expressing TC83 replicon (A750) exhibited higher levels of cytotoxicity than the GFP expressing flavivirus replicons. However, the 72 hr time-point had indicated that cells harboring a WNV replicon had a greatly increased cell death percentage from ˜9% to ˜54%. There are many possible reasons for this, but one major reason is that the live/dead staining system can only detect cells with compromised membranes, but not cells which have completely lysed. Cells transfected with the A750 replicon may have experienced a much more drastic level of apoptosis at earlier time points and may have been too damaged to be detected by the live/dead staining assay at the 48 hr and 72 hr marks and thus, the apparent level of cytotoxicity may be underestimated in this test condition. In contrast, the milder cytotoxicity of the WNV replicon may have introduced many cells which were membrane compromised, but not completely destroyed. Thus, there would be an increased apparent cytotoxicity in the 72 hr sample. This can be further investigated, but the results thus far and the methods by which the live-dead stain functions may indicate that the TC83-based replicons are extremely cytotoxic compared to flaviviral replicons. Cytotoxicity data using HeLa indicated that the TC83 replicon was the most cytotoxic at all time-points as expected followed by the WNV replicon and the YFV replicon. Levels of cytotoxicity increased for all replicons throughout the duration of the experiment.
Expression data in BHK cells demonstrates that GFP expression from the TC83-replicon drop over time, most likely due to the cytotoxic effect. GFP expression from the WNV replicon was initially low but increases significantly at 48 hr followed by a drop again at 72 hr. Expression of GFP from the YFV replicon appeared to be stable. In HeLa cells, GFP expression from the TC83-replicon continued to drop as it did in BHK cells, however, expression of GFP from flaviviral replicons continues to increase throughout the duration of the experiment.
The results demonstrate the different properties of flavivirus replicons compared to the TC83 replicon platform and the potential for flavivirus replicons.
For
Data Demonstrating Optimization of Reporters
In
Three FLFPD.RSVF-FurinF2A-GFP expressing replicons were developed. Two contained the reporter cassette in the structural deleted region. Of the replicons expressing the cassette from the structural deleted region, one contained the viral pRM signal peptide to drive processing of RSVF while the other contained the native RSVF signal peptide; both of these constructs contained an additional GSGP2A autoproteolytic cleavage site following GFP (WNV010 or WNV011]). The third replicon contained the EMCV-IRES driven FLFPD.RSVF-FurinF2A-GFP reporter cassette in an upstream region of the 3′UTR which was added using the native NsiI site (WNV012). FLAG tags were also added to the C-terminus of both RSVF and GFP reporter constructs. (
RNA from these constructs was tested in vitro using BHK cells using a variety of methods (
The FLFPD.RSVF-FurinF2A-GFP reporter gene was also evaluated in YFV replicons (without the 5′ UTR optimization as was not yet discovered during these tests). Replicon Y032 contained the EMCV-IRES driven FLFPD.RSVF-FurinF2A-GFP reporter cassette in an upstream region of the 3′ UTR. Y033 contained the reporter cassette in the structural deleted region with the viral pRM signal peptide driving processing of reporter based on results with WNV. FLAG tags were also added to the C terminus of both RSVF and GFP reporter constructs. A separate replicon, Y037 contained only a F2A-GFP′FLAG-GSGP2A reporter cassette to determine single reporter gene efficacy (
Additional mono-reporter (
Testing of optimized replicon reporters is further described in
Materials and Methods
Construction and Propagation of Flavivirus Vectors:
All WNV or YFV replicon sequences described in this study were assembled into low-copy number (p15 ori) vectors with ampicillin resistance cassettes. Vectors were constructed using a variety of molecular biology tools such as general restriction digestion and ligation, PCR, site-directed mutagenesis, and in-fusion cloning. WNV vectors were propagated via transformation of XL-10 Gold Ultracompetent cells (Agilent). YFV vectors were propagated via transformation of Stellar competent cells (Clontech). Carbenicillin (25 μg/ml) was used as a selection marker on agar Luria broth plates (Teknova) or in Luria broth media during plasmid preparation and growth.
Generation of Flavivirus Templates for In Vitro Transcription:
Plasmids holding WNV replicon sequences were used to generate templates prior to in vitro transcription using a variety of methods: (i) XbaI Linearization and exonuclease treatment—for constructs such as WNV001, plasmid WNV001 was linearized via XbaI (New England Biolabs) digestion for 2 hr at 37° C. followed by treatment with Mung Bean Nuclease (New England Biolabs) to remove non-native nucleotides from the template strand. (ii) PCR template generation—for constructs such as WNV001, plasmid WNV001 was used as a PCR template to generate a WNV replicon template without the need for digestion or exonuclease treatment. (iii) XbaI linearization—for constructs containing ribozyme sequences plasmids were linearized via XbaI digestion for 2 hr at 37° C. Plasmids holding YFV replicon sequences were used to generate templates prior to in vitro transcription using a variety of methods. (i) PmeI Linearization—for constructs containing ribozyme sequences plasmids were linearized via PmeI digestion (New England Biolabs) digestion for 2 hr at 37° C. (ii) PCR template generation—PCR was used to generate YFV replicon template without the need for digestion (iii) BspQI linearization—YFV plasmids containing a BspQI linearization site were linearized via BspQI (New England Biolabs) digestion for 2 hr at 50° C. Reaction products for all types of template generation were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen)
Generation of Alphavirus Templates for In Vitro Transcription:
Plasmids containing TC83 replicon sequences, such as A750, were linearized via BspQI digestion for 2 hr at 50° C. followed by purification using QIAquick PCR purification kit.
In Vitro Transcription:
Approximately 1 μg-5 μg of prepared DNA template was added into 50 μl-100 μl of in vitro transcription mix with the following formulation: 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (SIGMA), MgCl2 (SIGMA), 6 mM ATP, 6 mM GTP, 6 mM CTP, 6 mM UTP (NEB), 10 mM dithiothreitol (SIGMA), 2 mM spermidine (SIGMA), 0.002 U/μl pyrophosphatase (NEB), 0.8 U/μl RNase inhibitor (NEB), 1 U/μl T7 RNA polymerase (NEB). The reaction was incubated for 2 hr at 30° C. RNA was capped via the addition of the following components to the final concentration indicated: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 5 mM KCl (SIGMA), 2.5 mM GTP, 0.1 mM S-Adenosyl methionine (NEB), 3.5 mM Dithiothreitol, 0.01 U/μl Turbo DNAse (Invitrogen), 0.95 U/μl RNAse inhibitor, 0.2 U/μl vaccinia capping system (NEB), water to increase volume of initial reaction by 4×. The capping reaction was incubated for 1 hr at 30° C. 7.5 M LiCl was added to the in vitro transcription reaction to a final concentration of 2.8 M and incubated at −20° C. for 30 min or overnight. RNA was pelleted via centrifugation. The pellet was washed once with 70% ethanol and allowed to air dry followed by resuspension in nuclease free water. For applications where uncapped RNA was required, vaccinia capping enzyme was not included as a component.
Baby Hamster Kidney or HeLa Cell Culture:
BHK cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modification of Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Hyclone) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Omega Scientific), 100 units of penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), and 2 mM L-Glutamine (Invitrogen). Cells were grown at 37° C. and 5% CO2. HeLa cells were grown using a similar media formulation except supplemented with 10% FBS.
Electroporation of BHK Cells:
Baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells were collected from T225 parent flask at 80%-90% confluency by aspirating media and washing with 10 ml 1×DPBS. Approximately 10 ml trypsin (0.25%, phenol red, Life Technologies) was added to the flask and aspirated. Cells were incubated at 37° C. for 5 min and flask was agitated to assist cell detachment. To stop trypsination, 10 ml of media was added to the flask. Cells were centrifuged at ˜460× g for 5 min and media was removed. Cells were resuspended in OPTI-MEM (Life Technologies) to a final concentration of 4×106 cells/ml. The desired amount of RNA was added to a 2 mm cuvette along with mouse thymus RNA (Hyclone) to bring total RNA to 4.2 μg, followed by 250 μl of OPTI-MEM resuspended cells (1×106 cells). Electroporation was performed with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser X-Cell using the Square Wave protocol with the following parameters: 120 V, 25 msec pulse, 0 pulse interval, 1 pulse. Electroporated cells were allowed to rest for 10 min before being transferred to a well in a 6-well plate containing 2 ml of media.
Cationic Transfection of mRNA
BHK or HeLa were seeded into a 6-well plate at 250 k/well and were grown until 80% confluency. RNA was transfected into cells using a TransIT-mRNA kit (MIRUS). The transfection protocol for one-well is as follows and can be scaled up appropriately: 250 ng of RNA was diluted in Opti-MEM to a total volume of 265 μl; 1 μl of mRNA boost reagent was immediately added and gently swirled followed by the addition of 1 μl of TransIT-mRNA reagent; the solution was gently swirled again and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 3 min; the transfection solution was diluted in complete growth medium (DMEM+5% FBS or DMEM+10% FBS for BHK or HeLa cells, respectively) to a final volume of 2.5 ml and gently mixed. Media from a well to be transfected was aspirated and replaced with transfection media. Cells were incubated for 4 hr at 37° C. 5% CO2, after which the transfection media was replaced with normal growth media.
Immunohistochemistry to Detect WNV Antigen Expressing Cells:
Wells (6-well format) containing electroporated cells were washed with 1×DPBS and fixed in −20° C. acetone:methanol (1:1 v/v) for 3 min. Fixation solution was aspirated and cell layers were washed with 1×DPBS followed by the addition of PBS+2% normal goat serum (NGS, SIGMA) blocking solution for 1 hr at room temp. Following blocking, cells were incubated with 1:1000 dilution of primary antibody solution of anti-WNV mouse hyperimmune ascitic fluid (MHIAF, a gift from R.B. Tesh) in PBS+2% NGS at room temp for 1 h. Primary antibody solution was removed and cells were washed 2 times with 1×DPBS. Secondary antibody solution of 1:1000 dilution horse radish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM (HAL, Rockland) in PBS+2% NGS was then added and incubated at room temp for 2 h. Secondary antibody solution was removed and washed 3× with 1×PBS. To visualize cells, True Blue Peroxidase Substrate (KPL) was added to cell layer and incubated at 5 min at RT until blue color developed.
Western Blot Analyses:
Western blots were performed on cell supernatants and/or cell lysates as follows. Supernatants were collected and centrifuged to pellet debris. Debris free supernatant was stored at −20° C. until analysis. Cell lysates were collected by aspirating media and washing cell layers with 1×DPBS. Wash was removed and cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (Boston BioProducts) with pipetting to facilitate cell lysis. Lysates were centrifuged to pellet debris. Lysates were stored at −20° C. until analysis. Supernatants or lysates were diluted in 4× NuPage LDS Buffer (Life Technologies); for applications requiring reduction, 1M DTT (Life Technologies) was added to a final concentration of 62.5 mM. Samples were heated at 95° C. for 5 min followed by loading onto NuPAGE Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris Protein Gel (Life Technologies) and ran in 1×MOPS Buffer (Life Technologies) at 150V for 1 hr. Gel was transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlot Gel Transfer device (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions. Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with 1×PBS+0.1% Tween+10% milk. Membranes were washed 3× with 1×PBS+0.1% Tween and stained for WNV antigen, YFV antigen, or FLAG tags depending on the application as follows. WNV antigen staining: Primary antibody solution (1:1000 dilution of anti-WNV MHIAF in 1×PBS+0.1% Tween) was added to membrane and incubated at room temp. for 2 h, washed 3× with PBS+0.1% Tween. Secondary antibody solution (1:10000 dilution Rockland HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM in 1×PBS+0.1% Tween) was then added to the blot and incubated at room temp for 1 hr. Sample was washed 3× with 1×PBS+0.1% Tween and 1×PBS for 5 min. ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare) was added to the blot, following the manufacturer's instructions. Western blot films were developed by exposure onto ECL hyperfilm (GE Healthcare) and processed using Konica Minolta SRX-101A X-Ray device. YFV antigen staining: same protocol as above except primary antibody solution (1:1000 dilution of anti-WNV MHIAF in 1×PBS+0.1% Tween) was used. FLAG-Tag antigen staining: same protocol as above except primary antibody solution (Mouse Monoclonal ANTI-FLAG M2 Antibody 1 μg/ml, clone M2, SIGMA F1804 SLBD6976 in 1×PBS-T) was used.
Luciferase Assay:
Media was removed from cells and cell layers were washed with 1×DPBS. Wash was removed and 1× Cell Culture Lysis Buffer (Promega) was added to wells followed by scraping to facilitate cell layer lysis. Debris was pelleted via centrifugation and discarded. Lysates were stored at −80° C. until analysis. To measure luciferase activity, samples were thawed and equilibriated at room temperature and 20 μl of each sample was added to a well in a 96-w flat bottom, opaque well plate (Costar). The plate was analyzed using a Centro LB960 luminometer and accompanying MikroWin2000 software using the following parameters: Inject 100 μl luciferase assay reagent (Promega); 2 sec pause; 1 sec read.
Antigenic Replicon Potency Via Flow Cytometry Analysis:
Media was removed from cells and cell layers were washed with 1×DPBS. Trypsin (0.25%) was added to cells and incubated at 37° C. until cells began to detach. Detachment was facilitated by pipetting and transferred into a 96-well round bottom plate. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at ˜462× g for 3 min. Typsin was decanted and cells were washed 1× with staining buffer (1×PBS+0.25% bovine serum albumin+0.2% NaN3) and pelleted as before. Pellets were resuspended in Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD) and incubated at 4 C for 20 min and re-pelleted. Cells were washed 2× in Perm/Wash buffer (Perm/Wash buffer, BD, diluted to 1× in 1×PBS) with pelleting between washes. Antigens from TC83, WNV, or YFV were detected as follows per sample. TC83 antigen detection: 0.75 μl of J2 monoclonal antibody mouse, IgG2a, kappa chain (Scicons) was diluted in 0.75 μl Zenon Allophycocyanin (APC) mouse IgG2a labeling kit component A (Invitrogen) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature followed by the addition of 0.75 μl Zenon Allophycocyanin (APC) mouse IgG2a labeling kit component B and incubated for 5 min at room temp. The stain was diluted with 57.5 μl of perm/wash solution and a cell pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of the diluted solution and incubated for 30 min at 4° C. Stained cells were repelleted and washed 2× with perm/wash buffer and 2× with staining buffer. Cells were run through BD FACsCalibur E-4647 Instrument and potency was determined using FlowJo analysis software by determining the number of antigen positive cells compared to the total cell population. WNV antigen detection: same protocol as above except anti-WNV MHIAF was diluted into component A. YFV antigen detection: same protocol as above except anti-YFV MHIAF was diluted into component A.
Potency, Cytotoxicity, and Expression Analysis Using GFP Expressing Replicons
Media from cells transfected with GFP expressing replicons was harvested to collect any dead or unadhered cells along with cell layers via treatment with 0.25% trypsin. Mock transfected cells were used as a negative control and cells treated with 10 μg/μl puromycin in media were used as a positive control. Media and trypsinized cells were combined and centrifuged together at ˜462×g for 3 min. Cell pellets were washed with 1×DPBS and transferred into one well in a 96-well round bottom plate. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 1:1000 dilution of Live/Dead Fixable Far Red Dead Cell Stain (Molecular Probes) in 1×DBPS and incubated at 4° C. for 30 min. Live/Dead stained cells were pelleted and washed with twice with 1×DPBS+1% bovine serum albumin. Samples were run through the BD FACsCalibur E-4647 Instrument and FlowJo analysis software was used to analyze the data. Cytotoxicity was determined by gating for GFP positive cells indicating the presence of the replicon followed by determining percentage of dead cells within the GFP positive population. Potency was determined by gating for live cells and the percentage of GFP positive cells within the live population. GFP expression was determined by analyzing the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of live, GFP expressing cells.
It should be understood that for all numerical bounds describing some parameter in this application, such as “about,” “at least,” “less than,” and “more than,” the description also necessarily encompasses any range bounded by the recited values. Accordingly, for example, the description “at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5” also describes, inter alia, the ranges 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 3-4, 3-5, and 4-5, et cetera.
For all patents, applications, or other reference cited herein, such as non-patent literature and reference sequence information, it should be understood that they are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes as well as for the proposition that is recited. Where any conflict exists between a document incorporated by reference and the present application, this application will control. All information associated with reference gene sequences disclosed in this application, such as GeneIDs or accession numbers (typically referencing NCBI accession numbers), including, for example, genomic loci, genomic sequences, functional annotations, allelic variants, and reference mRNA (including, e.g., exon boundaries or response elements) and protein sequences (such as conserved domain structures), as well as chemical references (e.g., PubChem compound, PubChem substance, or PubChem Bioassay entries, including the annotations therein, such as structures and assays, et cetera), are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Headings used in this application are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this application.
Preferred features of each of the aspects provided by the invention are applicable to all of the other aspects of the invention mutatis mutandis and, without limitation, are exemplified by the dependent claims and also encompass combinations and permutations of individual features (e.g., elements, including numerical ranges and exemplary embodiments) of particular embodiments and aspects of the invention, including the working examples. For example, particular experimental parameters exemplified in the working examples can be adapted for use in the claimed invention piecemeal without departing from the invention. For example, for materials that are disclosed, while specific reference of each of the various individual and collective combinations and permutations of these compounds may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein. Thus, if a class of elements A, B, and C are disclosed as well as a class of elements D, E, and F and an example of a combination of elements A-D is disclosed, then, even if each is not individually recited, each is individually and collectively contemplated. Thus, in this example, each of the combinations A-E, A-F, B-D, B-E, B-F, C-D, C-E, and C-F are specifically contemplated and should be considered disclosed from disclosure of A, B, and C; D, E, and F; and the example combination A-D. Likewise, any subset or combination of these is also specifically contemplated and disclosed. Thus, for example, the sub-groups of A-E, B-F, and C-E are specifically contemplated and should be considered disclosed from disclosure of A, B, and C; D, E, and F; and the example combination A-D. This concept applies to all aspects of this application, including elements of a composition of matter and steps of method of making or using the compositions.
The forgoing aspects of the invention, as recognized by the person having ordinary skill in the art following the teachings of the specification, can be claimed in any combination or permutation to the extent that they are novel and non-obvious over the prior art—thus, to the extent an element is described in one or more references known to the person having ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded from the claimed invention by, inter alia, a negative proviso or disclaimer of the feature or combination of features.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15157068 | Feb 2015 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2016/051045 | 2/25/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/135675 | 9/1/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8399423 | Kandimalla | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20060062806 | Barrett | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9928487 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 2004040263 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2006086838 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2011049677 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jones et al. “Construction and applications of yellow fever virus replicons” Virology, 2005; 331: 247-259. |
Schirrmacher et al. Intra-pinna anti-tumor vaccination with self-replicating infectious RNA or with DNA encoding a model tumor antigen and a cytokine, Gene Therapy, 2000; 7: 1137-1147. |
Varnavski et al. Stable High-Level Expression of Heterologous Genes In Vitro and In Vivo by Noncytopathic DNA-Based Kunjin Virus Replicon Vectors, J. Virol. 2000; 74(9) 4394-4403. |
Queiroz et al. “Construction of yellow fever virus subgenomic replicons by yeast-based homologous recombination cloning technique”, Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 2013; 85; 1: 159-168. |
Coleman et al..Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, vol. 32, No. 1 e14 (Year: 2004). |
Jerzak et al., Virology 360 (2007) 469-476 (Year: 2007). |
Queiroz et al. “Construction of yellow fever virus subgenomic replicons by yeast-based homologous recombination cloning technique”, Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 2013; 85; 1: 159-168 (Year: 2013). |
Pijlman et al., Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. (2006) 6(2):135-145 (Year: 2006). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/IB2016/051045 dated May 3, 2016. 14 pages. |
Alcaraz-Estrada, Sofia L. et al. “Construction of Self-Replicating Subgenomic West Nile Virus Replicons for Screening Antiviral Compounds.” Methods in Molecular Biology. vol. 1030, Jan. 1, 2013, pp. 283-299. XP009185841. |
Queiroz, Sabrina R.A. et al. “Construction of yellow fever virus subgenomic replicons by yeast-based homologous recombination cloning technique.” Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Cinecias. vol. 85, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2013, pp. 159-168. XP055209438. |
Jones, Christopher T. et al. “Construction and applications of yellow fever virus replicons.” Virology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL. vol. 331, No. 2, Jan. 20, 2005, pp. 247-259. XP004701402. |
Herd, Karen A. et al. “Recombinant Kunjin virus replicon vaccines induce protective T-cell immunity against human papillomavirus 16 E7-expressing tumour.” Virology. Elsevier, vol. 319, No. 2, Feb. 20, 2004, pp. 237-248. XP004491671. |
Varnavski, Andrei N. et al. “Noncytopathic Flavivirus Replicon RNA-Based System for Expression and Delivery of Heterologous Genes.” Virology. vol. 255, No. 2, Mar. 15, 1999, pp. 366-375. XP004440024. |
Anraku et al., “Kunjin Virus Replicon Vaccine Vectors Induce Protective CD8+ T Cell Immunity”, Journal of Virology, 2002, 76(8):3791-3799. |
Paul, et al., “Selection of a T7 promoter mutant with enhanced in vitro activity by a novel multo-copy bead display aproach for in vitro evolution”, Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41(1):e29, 1-11. |
Ray et al., “West Nile Virus 5′-Cap Structure is Formed by Sequencial Guanine N-7 and Ribose 2′-O Methylations by Nonstructural Protein 5”, Journal of Virology, 2006, 80(7): 8362-8370. |
Takasaki, “West Nile fever/encephalitis”, Virus, 2007, vol. 57, No. 2, p. 199-206. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180036398 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |