Patent Application
20150250210
The present invention relates to the use of one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones for increasing the palatability of a foodstuff to a companion animal. The invention also relates to a pet foodstuff or supplement comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones, and also to a method of increasing the palatability of a foodstuff to a companion animal.
It is well known that many feline and canine companion animals are fussy with their food. An animal will often refuse to eat a foodstuff that it has been accepting over some time, or refuse to eat any more than a minimal amount of a foodstuff. Part of this phenomenon can be driven by subtle changes in the sensory profile of the raw materials. These changes might not be perceived by the human consumer, but due to a difference in the olfactory and gustatory systems, feline and canine companion animals may well perceive these differences. These sensory differences can be due to natural variation of the raw materials used or when materials are in short supply and have to be substituted with alternatives. This can be very frustrating for the owner and can result in the owner perceiving that the animal is unhappy and not enjoying its food. An animal may also fail to ingest its required amount of essential nutrients if not consuming an adequate amount of food available to it. Therefore, it can clearly be seen that there exists a need for a way to encourage companion animals to eat the foodstuff with which it is provided. Many solutions have been suggested to overcome this problem. Most commercially available pet foods are provided in a range of different flavours and/or textures. However, the companion animal owner will know that often a companion animal will suddenly, for no clear reason, refuse the flavour that the owner perceives to be its most preferred. Much research has been carried out on the flavour preferences of companion animals, by offering them a choice of different foodstuffs. The present inventors have taken this research further by studying the key taste receptor in cat, the umami receptor, (umami flavour is also referred to as savoury or meat flavour) and identifying the associated taste mechanisms. They have looked at a range of compounds, volatile and non-volatile, that are found in naturally occurring foodstuffs and established the interactions of these compounds and therefore developed a combination for optimal taste. Of particular interest and importance has been a focus on compounds that interact with and are perceived via the umami receptor.
Surprisingly, the inventors have found that companion animals show a strong and consistent preference for certain combinations of compounds, whether presented to the animals in water, a gel or in a model foodstuff. The present invention therefore relates to a use of a combination of compounds that is highly desirable to a companion animal for increasing palatability of a foodstuff to a companion animal. The companion animal is preferably a mammalian companion animal.
When a companion animal eats its recommended amount of (main meal) foodstuff each day, the animal will receive its required level of vitamins and minerals, and thus is highly likely to remain healthy and happy. Furthermore, the owner is satisfied that the animal is eating well. The inventors have identified certain volatile and non-volatile compounds that are present in natural products that particularly appeal to companion animals in combination. Non-volatile compounds relate to taste, (i.e. they are detected on the tongue); volatile compounds relate to aroma, and are compounds that affect the smell of the food, (i.e. compounds detected in the nose); and some compounds fall within both categories. The combination of both taste and aroma give the food its flavour. Flavour, as used herein, therefore encompasses both the taste and aroma of a foodstuff.
The invention, therefore, provides as a first aspect the use of one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones for increasing the palatability of a foodstuff to a companion animal and, therefore, for use in ensuring an adequate intake of food stuff by a companion animal. The amino acid may be selected from the group consisting of histidine, alanine and glycine.
The nucleotide may be selected from the group consisting of adenosine monophosphate (AMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), inosine monophosphate (IMP), uridine monophosphate (UMP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), xanthosine monophosphate (XMP) or a mixture of two or more thereof. The nucleotide may be AMP, GMP, or IMP or a mixture thereof. The nucleotide may be GMP alone, or IMP alone, or a mixture of IMP and GMP. The nucleotide may be a mixture of GMP and IMP from about 1% to about 99% of GMP and of from about 1% to about 99% of IMP, more preferably, of from about 20% to about 80% of GMP and of from about 20% to about 80% of IMP or a mixture of about 50% GMP and about 50% IMP.
The amino acid is selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine or a mixture of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11 thereof. Suitably, the amino acid may be selected from the group consisting of histidine, glycine and alanine. The amino acid is preferably in the L-amino acid form.
The furanone is suitably as set out in formula I or formula II, below, optionally substituted by hydroxyl, C1-6 alkyl, C1-6 alkoxy.
Each R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen or C1-6 alkyl, preferably hydrogen, methyl or ethyl;
R3 is hydrogen, hydroxyl or C1-6 alkyl, preferably methyl;
R4 is hydrogen, hydroxyl or C1-6 alkyl, preferably hydroxyl;
R5 is hydrogen, hydroxyl, C1-6 alkyl, C1-6 alkoxy, 5 or 6 membered saturated heterocycle or —OC(O)R7, preferably hydroxyl, —OCH3, —OCH2CH3, —OC(O)CH3, methyl or pyrrolidine;
R6 is hydrogen or C1-6 alkyl, preferably hydrogen or methyl;
R7 is C1-6 alkyl, preferably methyl.
The furanone may be selected from the group consisting of the furanones set out in Table 1, or a mixture of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 thereof. Suitably, the furanone is furaneol, homofuraneol, sotolon, norfuraneol, abhexon, mesifuranone, dimethoxyfuranone, or norfuraneol, as defined in Table 1. Alternatively, the furanone may be selected from the group consisting of furaneol, sotolon and abhexon, as defined herein in Table 1.
Furaneol
Acetoxydimethylfuranone
(2R)-(+)-Homofuraneol I
Dimethylethoxyfuranone
Sotolon
DMPF
Norfuraneol
(2R)-(+)-Homofuraneol II
Abhexon
(2S)-(−)-Homofuraneol I
Dimethylmethoxyfuranone (Mesifuranone)
(2S)-(−)-Homofuraneol II
Optionally, the invention may also include the use of a pyrophosphate, such as tetra potassium pyrophosphate or a disodium pyrophosphate. Polyphosphates may be included in the composition also, such as sodium tripolyphosphate. The pyrophosphates and/or polyphosphates may be present in the composition at a concentration of 1 mM or above. Suitably, the concentration of pyrophosphate and/or polyphosphate may be 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM, 25 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 100 mM or 500 mM.
The invention includes a composition comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids and one or more furanones, as herein defined, for use in increasing the palatability of a foodstuff to a companion animal. The composition may also comprise a pyrophosphate and/or polyphosphate as herein defined.
The one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine may be present (individually or as a combination) in an amount of less than 1M, 1 mM to 1M, 250 mM to 1M, 5 mM to 500 mM, 10 mM to 100 mM, 10 mM to 50 mM or 20 mM to 50 mM. The amount of amino acid may be less than 200 mM, less than 100 mM, less than 20 mM or less than 10 mM. The amino acid(s) may be present in an amount of 25 mM.
The one or more nucleotides may be present (individually or as a combination) in an amount of less than 100 mM, 0.1 mM to 100 mM, 0.5 mM to 50 mM, 1 mM to 20 mM or 5 mM to 10 mM. The nucleotide may be present in an amount of greater than 1 mM or greater than 2.5 mM. The nucleotide may be present in an amount of less than 50 mM, less than 20 mM or less than 10 mM. Most preferably, the one or more nucleotides may be present in an amount of 1 mM to 100 mM, such as 5 mM, or 2 mM. The nucleotide(s) may be present in an amount of 5 mM.
The one or more furanones may be present (individually or as a combination) at a concentration of greater than 0.005 ppm, 0.001 ppm to 40 ppm, 0.005 ppm to 20 ppm, 0.001 ppm to 5 ppm, 1 ppm to 10 ppm or 2 ppm to 5 ppm. The furanone(s) may be present in an amount less than 40 ppm. The furanone(s) may be present in an amount of 4 ppm.
The one or more nucleotides, the one or more amino acids and the one or more furanones for use in the invention are in addition to those found naturally in meat, vegetable or dairy products that may form part of a food stuff. The nucleotide(s) amino acid(s) and furanone(s) may be added to a pet food during or after manufacture. The nucleotide(s), amino acid(s) and furanone(s) are added in order to enhance or optimise the flavour profile of the basic meat (or other macronutrient) ingredients of the pet food.
The companion animal is preferably a feline animal (cat), or a canine animal (dog) although it may also be a guinea pig, a rabbit, bird or a horse.
The invention also provides as a second aspect a pet foodstuff comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine, and one or more furanones. The foodstuff may be packaged, wherein the packaging carries written or graphic information indicating that the pet foodstuff is meant to be consumed by a cat or a dog, or a guinea pig, a rabbit, a bird or a horse. The suitable and preferred features of the first aspect also apply to the second aspect, mutatis mutandis.
The combination of nucleotide, amino acid and furanone may be any set out in Table 2. The mixture of GMP to IMP may be of from 1 to 99:99 to 1, preferably from 20 to 80:80 to 20, or about 50:50 in all combinations including GMP and IMP in Table 2, provided of course that the total amount of the combination is 100%. The preferred levels of alanine, histidine and/or glycine and GMP, IMP, GMP/IMP and AMP are as stated above.
It should be noted that taurine is not included as an amino acid in respect of the invention. In fact, taurine is an organic sulfonic acid and lacks the carboxyl group which is characteristic of amino acids i.e. there is no COOH group. However in the art, such as described in US 2006/0286276 and US 2006/286275, taurine is often described as an amino acid, which is incorrect. Since taurine does not contain a carboxyl group it is postulated that it does not fit in the same way into the binding site of the umami receptor as does an amino acid as defined by the invention.
The invention also relates to, as a third aspect, a composition comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones for use in increasing the acceptance and/or ensuring adequate intake of a foodstuff in a companion animal. Increasing the palatability leads to increased enjoyment and acceptance of the foodstuff to the animal. Increased acceptance and enjoyment helps to overcome the fussiness of a companion animal with regard to food. Since the animal accepts and enjoys the foodstuff in accordance with the invention, it is more likely to reach its required daily calorie and nutrient intake.
The composition may be for use in increasing the appetising appeal of a foodstuff to an animal in order to encourage an animal to eat a healthy amount of foodstuff. Thus, the use of a composition comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones in increasing the appetising appeal of a foodstuff; in encouraging a healthy intake of a foodstuff; in ensuring the required intake of nutrients and calories in a companion animal, is included in the present invention. By healthy level it is meant an amount that enables the animal to maintain or achieve an intake contributing to its overall general health in terms of micronutrients, macronutrients and calories. By this it is meant that an animal may eat sufficient calories and receive a nutritionally complete diet without needing to eat excess calories and thus maintaining a healthy balance, such as set out in the “Mars Petcare Essential Nutrient Standards”.
As mentioned above, the umami receptor has been studied as a target for flavour compounds. Many studies relating to the activation of the umami receptor focus on the human umami receptor. However, surprisingly the inventors have found that the umami receptor of humans differs in sequence to that of certain companion animals as shown in
In the human umami receptor, the key active site residues involved in glutamate and IMP binding have been identified by in silico modelling and by site-directed mutagenesis. These studies show that the key residues are at positions H71, T149, S172, D192, Y220, E301 S306 and S385 and the residues are highly conserved in other species. A comparison of the human, pig, mouse and cat sequences showed only two changes in these particular residues (pig L220 and mouse A385).
The high level of conservation in these active site residues does not fit well with the different amino acid specificity for the umami receptor in the species studied. A study on pig umami receptors identified other residues in the active site that were reported as being important in binding. The amino acids in these locations were conserved between humans and pigs (R277, R307 and H308). On the basis of this similarity, pig umami was proposed as a model for human umami. However, the pig umami receptor showed a wide amino acid specificity (glutamate, alanine, asparagine, glutamine, serine and threonine) compared to the usual glutamate and aspartate ligands that are associated with human umami receptor activation. A report that used some other amino acids (glycine, alanine, serine) at high concentrations (up to 1M) suggested that these compounds delivered a umami sensation in humans but the effect was only monitored using sensory analysis and no receptor studies were reported. Thus it seems that the range of amino acids that activate the human umami receptor are very limited compared to other species and that the residues identified so far do not satisfactorily explain the difference in amino acid specificity between the pig and human umami receptors.
The invention also provides a method of enhancing the umami flavour/taste of a foodstuff, the method comprising adding to or including in the foodstuff one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones.
By enhancing it is meant that the umami flavour is detected more strongly/more intensely by the animal. It is thought that the addition of an amino acid strengthens the binding of a nucleotide to the umami receptor or vice versa. The addition of a furanone synergistically increases the umami flavour potency.
The present invention also provides a method of increasing an animal's preference for a foodstuff, the method comprising the addition of a nucleotide, an amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and a furanone to the foodstuff
Also provided is a method of enhancing the umami flavour of a foodstuff, the method comprising the addition of a nucleotide, an amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and a furanone to the foodstuff. A method of increasing the meaty (savoury) flavour of a foodstuff is also achieved by the use of a nucleotide, an amino acid selected from the group consisting of (glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine) and a furanone as described herein. The combination of the three components enables them to work in synergy to enhance umami flavour perception.
As a further aspect, the invention relates to a process for producing a pet foodstuff comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones, the method comprising the steps of adding and mixing one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones with a pet foodstuff. The addition and/or mixing may be carried out prior to, during or after formulating, processing or packaging the foodstuff. The addition and/or mixing of the nucleotide, amino acid and furanone may be sequential or simultaneous.
All features of all aspects apply to all other aspects, mutatis mutandis.
The inventors have found that the addition of one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones to a pet food product significantly increases the preference of a companion animal for the foodstuff. The animals show a strong preference for a foodstuff or water comprising one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and one or more furanones over a foodstuff or water having none, or one or two of these compounds. This overcomes the difficulties associated with fussy animals and ensures an animal eats the entirety of the recommended daily amount of foodstuff provided to it, resulting in the health and wellbeing of the animal as well as the peace of mind of the owner.
The advantage, therefore, of a three component mixture for inclusion in a foodstuff is several-fold: an animal will be encouraged to eat the foodstuff on a consistent and long term basis; the synergistic effect means that a lower amount of each of the ingredients needs to be included in a foodstuff, meaning cost effective use of each of the nucleotide, amino acid and furanone.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, the present inventors believe that the umami taste receptor on the tongue of an animal can detect a nucleotide and an amino acid (importantly, selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine) at different binding sites and thus, the effect of combining both a nucleotide and such an amino acid in the composition provides more than an additive effect of each component individually to the animal. This effect is further amplified by the addition of a furanone. The umami receptor is a heterodimeric transmembrane protein receptor and is also referred to in the art as T1R1/T1R3.
The present application shows that through in silico modelling of a non-human umami receptor and in vitro assays using a non-human umami receptor the inventors have found that the amino acids of the present invention, namely glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine are each able to bind to and activate the umami receptor to different extents.
Further modelling of the cat umami receptor identified two other positions in the active site (170 and 302) that contained very different residues between human and other species and could potentially modify the access of amino acids to the binding site and also modify the binding behaviour of amino acids. It appears that the binding of one of the amino acids of the invention may change the conformation of the umami receptor allowing it more contact with a bound nucleotide. As can be seen in
The flytrap domain consists of two lobes, an upper lobe and a lower lobe that are connected by a region known as the hinge, (
In silico modelling and in vitro testing by the inventors has shown that the amino acid binds near to the hinge region of the flytrap and the nucleotide binds at a region more distal to the hinge, but still remains between the lobes of the jaws. Thus, it appears that the amino acid first binds allowing the nucleotide to have a stronger connection with the receptor. Without the presence of the amino acid, the nucleotide seems to bind within the flytrap jaws but further away from the hinge region of the receptor. In the absence of the amino acid, the nucleotide does not appear to fit as tightly into the jaws/binding site as when the amino acid (in accordance with the invention) is present.
Thus, the nucleotide and the amino acid (selected from those listed herein) appear to work together in a coordinated manner in order to assist each other in binding to the umami receptor and increasing the perception of both compounds by the animal on the taste receptor when they are delivered together in a composition. Again, without wishing to be bound by theory, it appears that the amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine, and the nucleotide encourage each other in binding to the umami receptor. The umami flavour perception created from the nucleotide and amino acid binding is further increased by the presence of a furanone which acts in a synergistic manner.
The amino acids selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine all have in common an uncharged side chain, and it should be noted that this list does not include cyclic amino acids, spyro amino acids or alpha disubstituted amino acids. Furthermore, the types of amino acids that interact in a complementary fashion with nucleotides in this way to increase the perception of such compounds by an animal, include aromatic, polar, lipohilic or small saturated ring amino acids.
As mentioned above, in addition to in silico modelling of the feline umami receptor, sequence alignments of the human, cat and dog receptors have been performed. Interestingly, the human sequence alignment shows that two amino acids at position 170 and 302 (numbered in relation to the human T1R1 receptor) are found as alanine residues in human, whereas these positions are glutamate and aspartate in the other species. Additionally, the feline umami receptor does not bind aspartate or glutamate, which are natural ligands for the human T1R1/T1R3 receptor. Therefore, due to these significant differences, it would not be expected by the skilled person that compounds that are known to bind to the human receptor would affect the umami receptor of other animals as described herein.
It is noted that Yoshi et al., (Synergistic Effects of 5′-Nucleotides on Rat Taste Responses to Various Amino Acids, Brain Research, 367 (1986) 45-51), conclude that a synergistic effect is seen between the amino acids and nucleotides. However, the experiments described were not carried out in vivo, but rather utilised in vitro nerve signalling. Notably, it was assumed that a nerve response was concluded to be a positive response. However, as it is well known in the art, a nerve response can also be a negative response for an animal i.e. in vivo a nerve response could be a negative taste perception. Further, it can be seen that the amino acids discovered to be most responsive are not those that correlate to the information provided by the present invention. This is almost certainly due to the ‘artificial’ environment in which the amino acids were tested by Yoshi et al.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,524,747 describes the addition of a minimum of seven amino acids to a foodstuff to impart a “meaty” flavour. However, although a combination of seven amino acids could be contemplated by the present invention, the knowledge obtained by the inventors (that certain amino acids with a nucleotide and a furanone enhances palatability) enables fewer than seven amino acids to be utilised to increase the palatability of a foodstuff.
It is notable that none of the prior art known to the inventors contemplates the use of a nucleotide and amino acid, (particularly, an amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine) together with a furanone for enhancing the flavour of a foodstuff for a companion animal. As mentioned, these particular amino acids are thought to enhance the nucleotide binding to umami receptor working in a synergistic way, whereas other amino acids do not appear to bind to the umami receptor.
The nucleotide, amino acid and furanone according to the present invention may be incorporated into any product which an animal, such as a dog or a cat, may consume in its diet. Thus, the invention covers standard food products, supplements, pet food, drinks, snacks and treats. The food product is preferably a cooked product. It may incorporate meat or animal derived material (such as beef, chicken, turkey, lamb, blood plasma, marrowbone etc. or two or more thereof). The food stuff alternatively may be meat free (preferably including a meat substitute such as soya, maize gluten or a soya product) in order to provide a protein source. The product may contain additional protein sources such as soya protein concentrate, milk proteins, gluten etc. The product may also contain a starch source, such as gelatinised starch, such as one or more grains (e.g. wheat, corn, rice, oats, barely etc) or may be starch free. A typical dry commercial cat and dog food contains about 10-70% crude protein, about 10-60% fat and the remainder being carbohydrate, including dietary fibre and ash. A typical wet, or moist product contains (on a dry matter basis) about 40% fat, 50% protein and the remainder being fibre and ash. The present invention is particularly relevant for a pet foodstuff as herein described which is sold as a diet, foodstuff or supplement for a cat or dog. In the present text the terms “domestic” dog and “domestic” cat mean dogs and cats, in particular Felis domesticus and Canis domesticus. Preferably, the pet foodstuff will meet the macronutrient requirements of an animal preferably a ratio of protein:fat:carbohydrate of approximately 50:40:10 for feline animals and 30:60:10 for a canine animal.
As can be seen from the examples, below, it has been surprisingly found that an amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine, a nucleotide and a furanone of the invention provide a greater than additive effect when presented to an animal. In other words, the preference of a companion animal for the combination of a nucleotide, an amino acid selected from the group consisting of glycine, asparagine, alanine, cysteine, histidine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan and tyrosine and a furanone is greater than an additive effect of the preference for any or each of the individual compounds. The addition of a furanone increases this preference to a greater extent. That is, inclusion of a furanone increases preference by more than the additive effect of the preference for the furanone alone.
Thus, the unexpected benefit of the combination of one or more nucleotides, one or more amino acids and one or more furanones is increased palatability. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the present inventors believe that this is due to the conformation and positioning of the binding sites of the umami receptor for a nucleotide, amino acid and the enhancing effect of furanone, as described above.
The invention will now be described in reference to the following Figures and Examples in which:
All amino acids used in the examples were of the L-form. Ajitide is a 50:50 mixture of GMP:IMP.
Cats were allowed access to water containing 25 mM histidine+2.5 mM IMP and to water containing 25 mM histidine.
The methodology used a 2-bottle choice test with 24 cats (the final number of cats for each test can vary due to data being discarded by spillage, etc.). Cats were housed individually during trial periods and had free access to water available between testing periods. The test involved a choice test between the tastant/mixture at a given concentration dissolved in deionised water versus deionised water only or another tastant/mixture. Control was made for positional bias (e.g. A/B exposure 1 and B/A exposure 2) and evaporation loss. The testing time was 36 hours (i.e. 18 hours per day, allowing a two-day crossover). Following two consecutive days of each testing, cats had two consecutive days of rest. Cats were offered a dry diet as a single meal at the start of the test period for one hour, calculated to meet the individual requirements for each cat.
The results are shown in the table below, and in
Intake of the combination of histidine+IMP, was on average 25.74 g more that the intake of histidine alone, and shows a clear preference for the combination over histidine alone.
Cats were allowed access to water containing 25 mM histidine+2.5 mM IMP and to water containing 2.5 mM IMP alone.
The results are shown in the table below, and in
Intake of the combination of histidine+IMP, was on average 38.81 g more that the intake of IMP alone, which is a significant difference and shows a clear preference for the combination over IMP alone. The results of examples 1 and 2 together show that a combination of histidine and IMP is preferable to either of the compounds alone.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 25 mM alanine+2.5 mM GMP with a composition containing 25 mM alanine only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of the combination of alanine+GMP was, on average, 55.62 g more than the intake of water containing alanine alone which is a significant difference. This shows that the animals prefer the combination of alanine+GMP to alanine alone.
The difference test was carried out as described in example 2; however the composition containing 25 mM alanine+2.5 mM GMP was compared with a composition containing 2.5 mM GMP only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of GMP+alanine was, on average, 56.16 g more than the intake of GMP alone, which is a significant difference, and shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of alanine+GMP to GMP alone.
The results of Example 3 and 4 together show that a combination of alanine+GMP is preferable to either of the compounds alone.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 25 mM glycine+2.5 mM AMP with a composition comprising 25 mM glycine only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of glycine+AMP was, on average, 23.79 g more than the intake of glycine alone. This shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of glycine+AMP to glycine alone.
The difference test was carried out as described in Example 4; however the composition containing 25 mM glycine+2.5 mM AMP, was compared with a composition containing 2.5 mM AMP only.
The results are shown in the table below, and in
It can be seen that the intake of glycine+AMP was, on average, 36.63 g more than the intake of AMP, and shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of glycine+AMP to AMP alone.
The results of Examples 5 and 6 together show that a combination of glycine+AMP is preferable to either of the compounds alone.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 25 mM histidine+2.5 mM IMP/GMP (Ajitide)+4 ppm furaneol, with a composition comprising 2.5 mM IMP/GMP (Ajitide)+4 ppm furaneol only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of histidine+IMP/GMP(Aji)+furaneol was, on average, 63.07 g more than the intake of IMP/GMP+furaneol, and shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of histidine+IMP/GMP+furaneol to IMP/GMP+furaneol.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 2.5 mM IMP/GMP (Ajitide)+4 ppm furaneol, with a composition comprising 2.5 mM IMP/GMP (Ajitide) only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of IMP/GMP(Aji)+furaneol was, on average, 69.29 g more than the intake of IMP/GMP (Aji) alone, and shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of IMP/GMP (Aji)+furaneol to IMP/GMP (Aji) alone.
A difference test was carried out as for Example 6, however, a composition containing 25 mM histidine+1.25 mM IMP/GMP(Aji)+4 ppm furaneol, with a composition comprising 25 mM histidine+1.25 mM IMP/GMP (Aji) only.
The results are shown below and in
It can be seen that the intake of histidine+IMP/GMP+furaneol was on average 34.29 g more than the intake of histidine+IMP/GMP, and thus shows that the animals significantly preferred the combination of histidine+IMP/GMP+furaneol to histidine+IMP/GMP.
Cats were allowed access to gelatine gel containing either 25 mM histidine+2 ppm furaneol or a gel comprising 25 mM histidine only). The methodology used a 2-bowl choice test with 30 cats (the final number of cats for each test can vary due to data being discarded by spillage, etc.). Cats were housed individually during trial periods and had free access to water available between testing periods. The test involved a choice test between the tastant/mixture at a given concentration dissolved in a gelatine gel versus another tastant/mixture. Control was made for positional bias (e.g. A/B exposure 1 and B/A exposure 2). The testing time was 1 hour (i.e. 30 minutes per day, allowing a two-day crossover). Following two consecutive days of each testing, cats had two consecutive days of rest. Cats were offered a dry diet as a single meal prior to the start of the test period for 30 minutes, calculated to meet the individual requirements for each cat.
The results are shown below and in
It can be seen that the intake of histidine+furaneol was an average 29.84 g more than the intake of histidine alone, and thus shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of histidine+furaneol to histidine alone. This example also shows that a preference effect can be seen whether the base composition is water or a gel matrix.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 25 mM histidine+2.5 mM GMP+4 ppm furaneol, with a composition comprising 2.5 mM GMP+25 mM histidine only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of histidine+GMP+furaneol was, on average, 31.61 g more than the intake of GMP+histidine, and shows that the animals significantly prefer the combination of histidine+GMP+furaneol to GMP+histidine.
A difference test was carried out as described in Example 1 to compare a composition containing 25 mM histidine+2.5 mM GMP+5 ppm sotolon, with a composition comprising 2.5 mM GMP+25 mM histidine only.
The results are shown in the table below and in
It can be seen that the intake of histidine+GMP+sotolon was, on average, 8.85 g more than the intake of GMP+histidine, and shows that the animals prefer the combination of histidine+GMP+sotolon to GMP+histidine.
A difference test was carried out as previously described; however the compositions were a wet cat food either comprising histidine+IMP/GMP (Ajitide)+furaneol or a conventional reaction flavour system. The pet food comprising histidine+IMP/GMP+furaneol was preferred by the cats. Results are shown in
In vitro screening was carried out in order to establish which amino acids bind and activate the umami receptor. Results are shown in
In vitro screening was carried out in order to establish which nucleotides bind and activate the umami receptor. Results are shown in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12190888.3 | Oct 2012 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2013/072789 | 10/31/2013 | WO | 00 |
