Patent Grant
6929539
The present invention relates generally to flexible abrasive articles, such as abrasive sponges. More particularly, the present invention relates to a flexible abrasive product comprised of a foam backing and a shaped abrasive coating.
The use of abrasive products to finish the painted surface of a repaired portion of an automobile is well known. The original painted exterior surfaces of automobiles have a unique “orange peel” surface that is desirably duplicated when repairs are made. While prior coated abrasive products and abrasive slurries, either alone or in combination, typically in the presence of a liquid medium such as water, have been used to finish such surfaces, finishing techniques that use these products have produced less than optimal results.
Various patents disclose products and/or processes which are said to be useful for finishing painted automotive surfaces. See for example, EP 0 771 613 B1, published Apr. 5, 2000, WO 00/03840, published 27 Jan. 2000 based on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/116,038 filed Jul. 15, 1998, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,634.
Several problems are encountered by use of finishing products and/or techniques that are known in the art. These include the inability to provide a finished orange peel surface that duplicates the original surface. Additionally, some products encounter unwanted sticking to or grabbing between the moistened painted surface being finished and the surface of the abrasive product as it is rotated, for example on a “dual action” sander, or otherwise moved against the surface being finished. Other products are difficult to use. Some are thin with a pressure-sensitive adhesive attachment system and are difficult to remove from a release liner and, when attached to a support pad, are not easily deployed wrinkle-free.
A need exists for a flexible abrasive product which will refine a painted exterior automotive surface to provide a surface finish which, after a subsequent glazing step, substantially duplicates the original painted surface substantially without disturbing the orange peel. A need also exists for a flexible abrasive product which, when used under wet conditions with a dual action sander, will not grab the surface being finished.
This invention provides a flexible abrasive product, a method of making the same and a method of using the same. The novel abrasive product, when used under wet conditions to refine a painted exterior automotive surface which, after a subsequent glazing step, provides a surface finish which substantially duplicates the original painted surface without substantially disturbing the orange peel. In use with a dual action sander under conventional wet conditions, the novel flexible abrasive product will not grab or stick to the surface being finished.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a flexible abrasive article comprising:
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a flexible abrasive article which comprises:
The open cell foam preferable is in sheet form with planar major surfaces, but other surface-configurations are also useful. For example, the second major surface may be planar to facilitate attachment and the first major surface, i.e., the surface to which the abrasive coating will be applied, may be other than planar, such as an undulated or convoluted surface. Such convoluted foams are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,007,128, incorporated herein by reference.
While the flexible abrasive product according to the invention may be used by hand without an attachment system, it typically includes an attachment system on the second surface for attaching the abrasive article to a support pad. Such attachment system may include, for example, one part of a hook and loop fastening system with the other part of the hook or loop being on the support pad of the sander or abrasive tool which will be utilized to move the flexible abrasive product. Other types of fastening systems may include a coating of pressure-sensitive adhesive of a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition which is attachable to a smooth surface on the support pad of the tool.
In one embodiment the flexible abrasive article is made by a method which comprises the following steps:
The flexible abrasive article of the invention in a further embodiment, is made by a method which comprises the following steps:
Alternatively, the flexible abrasive product may be made by the following method:
The invention further provides a method of finishing a surface of a substrate, the method comprising the following steps:
Throughout this application, the following definitions apply:
A “flexible” abrasive article refers to an abrasive article that is sufficiently flexible that it may be folded upon itself, yet on release will redeploy without permanent structural alterations to its original configuration.
A “foraminous” barrier coating is a barrier coating that is characterized by having porosity sufficient to permit liquid passage therethough.
A “shaped” abrasive coating refers to an abrasive coating comprised of abrasive particles in a binder that has other than the typical topographic surface as may be encountered in conventional coated abrasive products, but instead would have a textured surface having raised portions and recessed portions which may be in an ordered or a random pattern.
A shaped “foraminous” abrasive coating is a shaped abrasive coating that is characterized by having porosity sufficient to permit liquid passage throughout its area.
An “impervious” coating refers to a coating that has properties which are the opposite of those of a foraminous coating, i.e., it has substantially no porosity which will permit liquid passage.
The various aspects of the invention will be better understood from the following description of figures and the preferred embodiments of the invention.
The flexible abrasive product of the invention may be prepared by coating an open cell foam backing with a barrier coating composition, e.g., by roll coating, spray coating or curtain coating, curing the barrier coating composition, e.g., in a forced air oven heated at the curing temperature of the barrier coating composition to provide the coated backing bearing a foraminous barrier coating.
The barrier coated backing may be coated with an abrasive coating according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,541, incorporated herein by reference.
After the abrasive article is formed, it can be flexed and/or humidified prior to converting. The abrasive article can be converted into any desired form such as a cone, endless belt, sheet, disc, etc. before use.
Referring now to
Foam Backing
In general, any open cell foam resilient backing with coatable surfaces on at least one surface may be used in the abrasive articles of the invention. Such foams preferably have a sheet-like configuration with planar major surfaces, although foams with one or both major surfaces being other than planar are also useful. Such surfaces may include a plurality of depressions or a plurality of projections which respectively may vary widely in depth, height, spacing, diameter and shape. Useful foam substrates have an elongation ranging from about 85 to about 150% (i.e., the stretched length of the foam minus the unstretched length of the foam all divided by the unstretched length of the foam and then multiplied by 100 equals 85 to 150%.). Specific embodiments of the invention include open cell foam substrates having elongation values of approximately 100 to 150%. The thickness of the foam substrate is only limited by the desired end use of the abrasive article. Preferred foam substrates have a thickness in the range of about 1 mm to about 50 mm, although substrates having a greater thickness can also be used.
The major surfaces of the open cell foam resilient backing may be either planar or ordered nonplanar, i.e., they may be contoured into a regular array of projecting portions and recessed portions as shown in FIG. 16. Such ordered nonplanar foams may be prepared by, e.g., the process depicted in
The dimensions of a rectangular array of projecting portions and recessed portions are somewhat dependent on the method by which the array is produced. Preferably, the distance between adjacent projecting and recessed features is 0.03 to 40 mm, more preferably 1 mm to 25 mm, and most preferably 2 to 12 mm. Preferably, the distance between adjacent projecting portions is between 1.5 mm and 50 mm, more preferably between 3 mm and 25 mm, and most preferably between 5 mm and 15 mm.
The open cell foam backing of the flexible abrasive product of the invention typically is in a sheet-like form most preferably with a minimum thickness of at least about 2 mm and preferably with a bulk density as determined by ASTM D-3574 of greater than about 0.03 gram per cm3 (2 lbs per ft3). Useful embodiments of open cell foam backings have bulk densities of about 0.03 to about 0.10 grams per cm3 (1.8-6 lbs per ft3). While thinner and/or lighter open cell foams may be useful, they may require special handling because they are somewhat more difficult to process on conventional coating equipment. The open cell foam backing preferably is formed of a foam having sufficient porosity to permit the entry of liquid water. The nature of the openings in the open cell foam backing may be appreciated by referring to
The materials generally found to be useful to be made into the open cell foam are organic polymers that are foamed or blown to produce porous organic structures, which are typically referred to as foams. Such foams may be prepared from natural or synthetic rubber or other thermoplastic elastomers such as polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polyurethanes, and copolymers thereof, for example. Suitable synthetic thermoplastic elastomers include, but are not limited to, chloroprene rubbers, ethylene/propylene rubbers, butyl rubbers, polybutadienes, polyisoprenes, EPDM polymers, polyvinyl chlorides, polychloroprenes, or styrene/butadiene copolymers. Particular examples of useful open cell foams are polyester polyurethane foams, commercially available from illbruck, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. under the illbruck, Inc. trade designations R 200U, R 400U, R 600U and EF3-700C. Particular examples of convoluted open cell foams are polyester polyurethane foams, commercially available from illbruck, Inc. under the trade designation MINI-STANDARD CONVOLUTES.
Barrier Coating
Preferred barrier coating compositions comprise a suitable coatable material such as a polymer dissolved or dispersed as a latex, for example, in a suitable liquid carrier material such as a solvent. Such compositions preferably are easily coated onto one major surface of the open cell foam substrate and, once coated, cured to provide a foraminous coating or a nonforaminous barrier coating that will later be perforated. Suitable materials for forming the foraminous barrier coating are acrylic latex emulsions that will coat the surface of the open cell foam backing without blocking the pores so that porosity remains after curing. A preferred composition for forming the foraminous barrier coating is an acrylic emulsion available from BF Goodrich, Cleveland, Ohio under the trade designation HyCar™ 2679 latex. The dry coating weight of barrier coating applied to the open cell foam preferably is at least 50 grams per square meter (gsm) and typically may vary between 65 gsm and 180 gsm.
Useful barrier coats which cure to provide an impervious coating which is later perforated to make it foraminous include an acrylic latex (e.g., HyCar™ 2679) which has been thickened to provide a coating composition that will not readily penetrate the open cell foam backing but instead will remain a surface layer which will cure to provide the impervious barrier coating. The acrylic emulsion is thickened by the addition of a thickening agent such as solution of a polyacrylic acid available under the trade designation Carbopol™ EZ-1 from BF Goodrich which has been thickened by the addition of an aqueous ammonium hydroxide solution which serves as an activator for the Carbopol™ EZ-1 polyacrylic acid solution. The dry coat weight of the barrier coating which will cure to provide an impervious coating is preferably at least 150 gsm and typically may vary between about 160 to 190 gsm. After curing, the impervious barrier coating is overcoated with a shaped coating comprised of curable binder and abrasive particles, which is then cured. Such coatings may be made foraminous by perforating the cured coatings preferably from the abrasive side with a staggered 20×20 array of needles (Foster™ 15×18×25×3.5 RB) deployed in a standard needle board with rows and columns being spaced ½ inch (1 cm) apart and operated at 37 strokes per 10 inch (25 cm) length to provide about 148 penetrations per square inch (about 6.5 cm2). Such needles and a needle board may be obtained from Foster Needle Company, Inc., Manitowoc, Wis.
Shaped Abrasive Coating
The shaped foraminous abrasive coating is formed by providing a slurry of fine abrasive particles in a curable binder system.
As previously mentioned, the shaped foraminous abrasive coating is preferably made according to the method described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 (Spurgeon, et al.). Any of a variety of methods of forming a shaped coated abrasive coating may be employed to be applied to the impervious barrier coating. Such methods include, for example, that disclosed in Spurgeon, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816, that disclosed in Christianson, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,910,471, that disclosed in Bruxvoort, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,794, that disclosed in Pieper, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 and that disclosed in Ravipati, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,014,468, each of these patents being incorporated herein by reference.
In the event that ordered nonplanar open cell foam backings having projecting and recessed portions on a first major surface (“front” surface), the coating conditions are maintained such that when the production tool is applied to the projecting and recessed areas they are momentarily compressed into a planar configuration. Upon subsequent release of the compression, the projecting and recessed portions recover. Such momentary compression results in uniform coatings and shaped abrasive coatings having shaped features that are oriented normal to the surfaces of the various projecting and recessed areas.
The coatable composition which is curable to provide a shaped abrasive coating is then applied to the impervious barrier coating by a technique which imparts a texture to the abrasive layer to provide the shaped abrasive coating on curing. The shaped abrasive coating and impervious barrier coating over the open cell foam backing are then perforated by use of a suitable needle board to provide the necessary porosity through the abrasive article. Perforation is preferably from front (the abrasive side) to back to avoid discontinuities in the abrasive coating. The openings in a perforated shaped foraminous abrasive coating are characterized by being in a regular pattern, i.e., corresponding to the pattern of the needle board and web traverse which was used to form them, although the openings themselves are somewhat irregular in shape due to the fracturing of the abrasive coating as it is penetrated by the needles.
The mixture to be used to form the shaped abrasive coating, in either case, for application to a foraminous barrier coated open cell foam or to an impervious barrier coated open cell foam, comprises a plurality of abrasive particles dispersed in a binder precursor sometimes referred to as a curable binder. As used herein, the term “mixture” means any composition comprising a plurality of abrasive particles dispersed in a binder precursor. It is preferred that the mixture be flowable. However, if the mixture is not flowable, it can be extruded or forced by other means, e.g. heat or pressure or both, onto the contacting surface of the production tool or onto the front surface of the backing. The mixture can be characterized as being conformable, that is, it can be forced to take on the same shape, outline, or contour as the contacting surface of the production tool and the front surface of the open cell foam backing.
The abrasive particles typically have an average particle size ranging from about 0.1 to 1500 micrometers, usually from about 1 to 400 micrometers. It is preferred that the abrasive particles have a Mohs' hardness of at least about 8, more preferably above 9. However, the particles may have a Mohs' hardness value lower than 8 depending on intended use. Examples of abrasive particles suitable for use in this invention include fused aluminum oxide, ceramic aluminum oxide, heat treated aluminum oxide, white aluminum oxide, green silicon carbide, silicon carbide, alumina zirconia, diamond, ceria, cubic boron nitride, garnet, and combinations thereof The phrase “abrasive particles” includes both individual abrasive grits and a plurality of individual abrasive grits bonded together to form an agglomerate. Abrasive agglomerates are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,311,489; 4,652,275; and 4,799,939, incorporated herein by reference.
The binder precursor is capable of being cured by energy, preferably radiation energy, more preferably, radiation energy from ultraviolet light, visible light, or electron beam sources. Other sources of energy include infrared, thermal, and microwave. It is preferred that the energy not adversely affect the production tool used in the method of the invention, so that the tool can be reused. The binder precursor can polymerize via a free radical mechanism or a cationic mechanism. Examples of binder precursors that are capable of being polymerized by exposure to radiation energy include acrylated urethanes, acrylated epoxies, ethylenically unsaturated compounds, aminoplast derivatives having pendant unsaturated carbonyl groups, isocyanurate derivatives having at least one pendant acrylate group, isocyanate derivatives having at least one pendant acrylate group, vinyl ethers, epoxy resins, and combinations thereof. The term “acrylate” includes acrylates and methacrylates.
Acrylated urethanes are diacrylate esters of hydroxy terminated NCO extended polyesters or polyethers. Examples of commercially available acrylated urethanes include that available under the trade name “UVITHANE™ 782,” from Morton Thiokol Chemical, and those available under the trade designations “CMD 6600,” “CMD 8400,” and “CMD 8805,” from Radcure Specialties.
Acrylated epoxies are diacrylate esters of epoxy resins, such as the diacrylate esters of bisphenol A epoxy resin. Examples of commercially available acrylated epoxies include those available under the trade designations “CMD 3500,” “CMD 3600,” and “CMD 3700,” from Radcure Specialties.
Ethylenically unsaturated compounds include both monomeric and polymeric compounds that contain atoms of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and optionally, nitrogen and the halogens. Oxygen or nitrogen atoms or both are generally present in ether, ester, urethane, amide, and urea groups. Ethylenically unsaturated compounds preferably have a molecular weight of less than about 4,000. The preferred ethylenically unsaturated compounds are esters made from the reaction of compounds containing aliphatic monohydroxy groups or aliphatic polyhydroxy groups and unsaturated carboxylic acids, such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, itaconic acid, crotonic acid, isocrotonic acid, maleic acid, and the like. Representative examples of ethylenically unsaturated compounds include methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, styrene, divinylbenzene, vinyl toluene, ethylene glycol diacrylate, ethylene glycol methacrylate, hexanediol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, trimethylopropane triacrylate, glycerol triacrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, pentaerythritol methacrylate, and pentaerythritol tetraacrylate. Other ethylenically unsaturated compounds include monoallyl, polyallyl, and polymethallyl esters and amides of carboxylic acids, such as diallyl phthalate, diallyl adipate, and N,N-diallyladipamide. Still other nitrogen-containing ethylenically unsaturated compounds include tris (2-acryloyloxyethyl)isocyanurate, 1,3,5-tri(2-methyacryloxyethy)-s-triazine, acrylamide, methylacrylamide, N-methylacrylamide, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, N-vinylpyrrolidone, and N-vinylpiperidone.
Aminoplast resins suitable for this invention have at least one pendant α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group per molecule or oligomer. These materials are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,903,440 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,472, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Isocyanurate derivatives having at least one pendant acrylate group and isocyanate derivatives having at least one pendant acrylate group are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,652,275, incorporated herein by reference. The preferred isocyanurate derivative is a tri-acrylate of tris(hydroxy ethyl)isocyanurate.
Epoxy resins have an oxirane ring and are polymerized by opening of the ring. Epoxy resins suitable for this invention include monomeric epoxy resins and oligomeric epoxy resins. Representative examples of epoxy resins preferred for this invention include 2,2-bis[4-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)phenylpropane](diglycidyl ether of bisphenol) and commercially available materials under the trade designation “Epon™ 828,” “Epon™ 1004,” and “Epon™ 1001F,” available from Shell Chemical Co., under the trade designations “DER™-331,” “DER™-332,” and “DER™-334,” available from Dow Chemical Co. Other epoxy resins suitable for this invention include glycidyl ethers of phenol formaldehyde novolac (e.g., under the trade designations “DEN™-431” and “DEN™-428,” available from Dow Chemical Co.). Epoxy resins useful in this invention can polymerize via a cationic mechanism in the presence of one or more appropriate photoinitiators. These resins are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,318,766, incorporated herein by reference.
If either ultraviolet radiation or visible radiation is to be used, it is preferred that the binder precursor further comprise a photoinitiator. Examples of photoinitiators that generate a free radical source include, but are not limited to, organic peroxides, azo compounds, quinones, benzophenones, nitroso compounds, acyl halides, hydrazones, mercapto compounds, pyrylium compounds, triacrylimidazoles, bisimidazoles, phosphene oxides, chloroalkyltriazines, benzoin ethers, benzil ketals, thioxanthones, acetophenone derivatives, and combinations thereof
Cationic photoinitiators generate an acid source to initiate the polymerization of an epoxy resin. Cationic photoinitiators can include a salt having an onium cation and a halogen containing a complex anion of a metal or metalloid. Other cationic photoinitiators include a salt having an organometallic complex cation and a halogen containing complex anion of a metal or metalloid. These are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,138, incorporated herein by reference. Another example of a cationic photoinitiator is an organometallic salt and an onium salt described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,985,340; European Patent Applications 306,161; 306,162; all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Still other cationic photoinitiators include an ionic salt of an organometallic complex in which the metal is selected from the elements of Periodic Group IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB and VIIIB.
In addition to the radiation curable resins, the binder precursor may further comprise resins that are curable by sources of energy other than radiation energy, such as condensation curable resins. Examples of such condensation curable resins include phenolic resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, and urea-formaldehyde resins.
The binder precursor can further comprise optional additives, such as, for example, fillers (including grinding aids), fibers, lubricants, wetting agents, surfactants, pigments, dyes, coupling agents, plasticizers, and suspending agents. An example of an additive to aid in flow properties has the trade designation “OX-50,” commercially available from DeGussa. The amounts of these materials can be adjusted to provide the properties desired. Examples of fillers include calcium carbonate, silica, quartz, aluminum sulfate, clay, dolomite, calcium metasilicate, and combinations thereof Examples of grinding aids include potassium tetrafluoroborate, cryolite, sulfur, iron pyrites, graphite, sodium chloride, and combinations thereof The mixture can contain up-to 70% by weight filler or grinding aid, typically up to 40% by weight, and preferably from 1 to 10% by weight, most preferably from 1 to 5% by weight.
A preferred mixture for making the abrasive coating for the products of the present invention comprises 19.47 parts by weight trimethylolpropane triacrylate available under the trade designation SR 351 from Sartomer Company, Exton, Pa., 12.94 parts by weight 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate available under the trade designation SR 339 from Sartomer Company, 3.08 parts by weight dispersant available under the trade name Zephrym™ PD 9000, 1.08 part by weight ethyl 2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoylphenyl-phosphinate available under the former trade designation Lucirin™ LR 8893 (now under the trade designation Lucirin™ TPO-L) from BASF as a photoinitiator, 1.93 part by weight gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane available under the trade designation Silquest™ A-174™ Silane from Witco, Corp., Greenwich, Conn., as a resin modifier and 61.50 parts by weight grade GC 3000 green silicon carbide abrasive particles having an average particle size of 4.0 μm available from Fujimi Abrasives Company, based on 100.00 parts by weight total.
The mixture can be prepared by mixing the ingredients, preferably by a low shear mixer. A high shear mixer can also be used. Typically, the abrasive particles are gradually added into the binder precursor. Additionally, it is possible to minimize the amount of air bubbles in the mixture. This can be accomplished by pulling a vacuum during the mixing step.
During the manufacture of the shaped, handleable structure, radiation energy is transmitted through the production tool and into the mixture to at least partially cure the binder precursor. The phrase “partial cure” means that the binder precursor is polymerized to such a state that the resulting mixture releases from the production tool. The binder precursor can be fully cured once it is removed from the production tool by any energy source, such as, for example, thermal energy or radiation energy. The binder precursor can also be fully cured before the shaped, handleable structure is removed from the production tool.
Sources of radiation energy preferred for this invention include electron beam, ultraviolet light, and visible light. Other sources of radiation energy include infrared and microwave. Thermal energy can also be used. Electron beam radiation, which is also known as ionizing radiation, can be used at a dosage of about 0.1 to about 10 Mrad, preferably at a dosage of about 1 to about 10 Mrad. Ultraviolet radiation refers to non-particulate radiation having a wavelength, within the range of about 200 to 400 nanometers, preferably within the range of about 250 to 400 nanometers. It is preferred that ultraviolet radiation be provided by ultraviolet lamps operating in a range of 100 to 300 Watts/cm. Visible radiation refers to non-particulate radiation having a wavelength within the range of about 400 to about 800 nanometers, preferably within the range of about 400 to about 550 nanometers.
In the method of this invention, the radiation energy is transmitted through the production tool and directly into the mixture. It is preferred that the material from which the production tool is made not absorb an appreciable amount of radiation energy or be degraded by radiation energy. For example, if electron beam energy is used, it is preferred that the production tool not be made from a cellulosic material, because the electrons will degrade the cellulose. If ultraviolet radiation or visible radiation is used, the production tool material should transmit sufficient ultraviolet or visible radiation, respectively, to bring about the desired level of cure.
The production tool should be operated at a velocity that is sufficient to avoid degradation by the source of radiation. Production tools that have relatively high resistance to degradation by the source of radiation can be operated at relatively lower velocities; production tools that have relatively low resistance to degradation by the source of radiation can be operated at relatively higher velocities. In short, the appropriate velocity for the production tool depends on the material from which the production tool is made.
The production tool can be in the form of a belt, e.g., an endless belt, a sheet, a continuous sheet or web, a coating roll, a sleeve mounted on a coating roll, or die. The surface of the production tool that will come into contact with the mixture has a topography or pattern. This surface is referred to herein as the “contacting surface.” If the production tool is in the form of a belt, sheet, web, or sleeve, it will have a contacting surface and a non-contacting surface. If the production tool is in the form of a coating roll, it will have a contacting surface only. The topography of the abrasive article formed by the method of this invention will have the inverse of the pattern of the contacting surface of the production tool. The pattern of the contacting surface of the production tool will generally be characterized by a plurality of cavities or recesses. The opening of these cavities can have any shape, regular or irregular, such as a rectangle, semicircle, circle, triangle, square, hexagon, octagon, etc. The walls of the cavities can be vertical or tapered. The pattern formed by the cavities can be arranged according to a specified plan or can be random. The cavities can butt up against one another.
Thermoplastic materials that can be used to construct the production tool include polyesters, polycarbonates, poly(ether sulfone), poly(methyl methacrylate), polyurethanes, polyvinylchloride, polyolefins, polystyrene, or combinations thereof Thermoplastic materials can include additives such as plasticizers, free radical scavengers or stabilizers, thermal stabilizers, antioxicants, and ultraviolet radiation absorbers. These materials are substantially transparent to ultraviolet and visible radiation. One type of production tool is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816. Examples of materials forming the production tool include polycarbonate and polyester. The material forming the production tool should exhibit low surface energy. The material of low surface energy improves ease of release of the abrasive article from the production tool. Examples of materials suitable include polypropylene and polyethylene. In some production tools made of thermoplastic material, the operating conditions for making the abrasive article should be set such that excessive heat is not generated. If excessive heat is generated, this may distort or melt the thermoplastic tooling. In some instances, ultraviolet light generates heat. It should also be noted that a tool consisting of a single layer is also acceptable, and is the tool of choice in many instances. A thermoplastic production tool can be made according to the procedure described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816.
Roller 40 was used to make a production tool of the type described above to impart a shaped surface to the abrasive articles depicted in
An alternative roller 50 is depicted in
Roller 50 is also useful for producing a preferred production tool for use in the process depicted in FIG. 1.
The flexible abrasive product of the present invention is typically used in surface finishing applications with a sanding device such as a dual action sander. A useful dual action sander is that sold by Dynabrade Inc. of Clarence, N.Y. under the trade designation Dynorbital™ sander model number 56964. Such a sander typically requires a sanding pad having a surface to which the flexible abrasive product of the invention will be mounted. A preferred pad surface typically includes one part of a two part attachment surface such as a looped fabric to which a backing bearing hooks or flattened stems on the backside of the abrasive product will engage. A preferred backing for this purpose is known under the trade designation Hookit™ II laminating backing made available in abrasive products sold, for example, under the trade designation 3M™ Hookit™ II Finishing Film Discs by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minn.
Workpiece
The workpiece can be any of a variety of types of material such as painted surfaces (clear coat, base (color) coat, primer or e-primer) coated surfaces (polyurethane, lacquer, etc), plastics (thermoplastic, thermosetting), reinforced plastics, metal, (carbon steel, brass, copper, mild steel, stainless steel, titanium and the like) metal alloys, ceramics, glass, wood, wood-like materials, composites, stones (including gem stones), stone-like materials, and combinations thereof The workpiece may be flat or may have a shape or contour associated with it. Examples of common workpieces that may be polished by the abrasive article of the invention include painted automotive surfaces (car doors, hoods, trunks, etc.), plastic automotive components (headlamp covers, tail-lamp covers, other lamp covers, arm rests, instrument panels, bumpers, etc.), flooring (vinyl, stone, wood and wood-like materials), counter tops, other plastic components and the like.
Depending upon the application, the force load at the polishing interface may range from about 0.01 kg to over 25 kg. Generally, this range is between 1 kg to 15 kg of force load at the polishing interface. Also, it is preferred to have a liquid present during polishing. The liquid may be water and/or an organic compound. These liquids may also contain other additives such as defoamers, degreasers, lubricants, soaps, corrosion inhibitors, or the like. The abrasive article may oscillate at the abrading interface during use.
At least one or both of the abrasive article and the workpiece is moved relative to the other. The abrasive disc may range from about 50 mm to 1,000 mm in diameter. Typically, abrasive discs are secured to a back-up pad by an attachment means. The attachment means may be a hook and loop type attachment, where the hooks may be on the back side of the abrasive article and the loops on the support pad or vice versa. Alternatively, the attachment system may be a pressure sensitive adhesive. The abrasive discs typically rotate between 100 to 20,000 revolutions per minute, usually between 1,000 to 10,000 revolutions per minute. The back up pad may rotate in a circular fashion, orbital fashion or random orbital fashion. Alternatively, the abrasive article of the invention may be used by hand.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples wherein all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
Identification of Ingredients
“HyCar™ 2679” is an acrylic latex obtained from BF Goodrich Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio containing about 50% by weight acrylic polymer solids in an aqueous medium which includes trace quantities of formaldehyde.
“Carbopol™ EZ-1” is an acrylic resin powder comprised of crosslinked acrylic acid polymer used as a thickener obtained from BF Goodrich Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio.
“Ammonium Hydroxide Solution” is an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide containing 29.5% by weight NH3.
“3M Fluorad™ Fluorosurfactant FC-129” is an anionic surfactant consisting of 50% by weight potassium fluoroalkyl carboxylates dissolved in 14% by weight 2-butoxyethanol, 4% by weight ethyl alcohol and 32% by weight water obtained from Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) of St. Paul, Minn.
“Hookit™ II Laminating Backing” is one part of a 2-part fastening system comprising sheet material bearing on one side a multiplicity of erect stems that have flattened distal ends that is made according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,540 and manufactured by 3M Company of St. Paul, Minn. The flattened stems are engageable in a fabric material which provides the other part of 2-part fastening system, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,102. The Hookit™ II laminating backing is mounted on the backside of an abrasive pad by an adhesive coating on its backside which is brought into contact with the backside of the abrasive pad.
“SR 351” is trimethylolpropane triacrylate monomer having a molecular weight of 296 and functionality of 3 available under the designation SR-351 from Sartomer Company, Exton, Pa.
“SR 339” is 2-Phenoxyethyl acrylate aromatic monomer having a molecular weight of 192 and functionality of 1 available under the designation SR-339 from Sartomer Company, Exton, Pa.
“PD 9000” is a polymeric disperant available under the trade designation Zephrym™ PD 9000 (formerly known as Hypermer PS-4) from Uniqema an international business of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC.
“A -174™” is gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane resin modifier available under the trade designation SILQUES™ A-174™ silane from Witco Corporation, Greenwich, Conn.
“TPO-L” is ethyl 2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoylphenylphosphinate photoinitiator available under the trade designation LUCIRINM TPO-L (formerly known as LUCIRIN™ LR 8893) from BASF Corp., Charlotte, N.C.
“Green SiC” is green silicon carbide abrasive particles having a grade size of GC 3000 and an average particle size of 4.0 μm as determined by Coulter™ Counter available under the trade designation FUJIMI GC 3000 from Fujimi Abrasives Company, Elmhurst, Ill.
Table 1 shows the trade designations for open cell polyester polyurethane foams obtained from illbruck, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.:
“EF3-700C” is the trade designation of illbruck, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. for a felted, polyether foam felted at a ratio of 3:1 to its thickness. The EF3-700C foam has a bulk density of 1.65-1.9 lb/ft3 (26-30 kg/m3), a tensile strength of 12 psi (0.8 kg/cm2), an elongation of 85%.
The air permeability values of various open cell foam samples, both uncoated and coated with a barrier coat, were determined by use of the Frazier™ air permeability measuring instrument described above. These values are set forth in Table 2.
1The test sample was 4 inches by 6 inches (about 5 cm by 7.5 cm).
2Open cell foam was coated with an impervious barrier coat.
Examples 1-6 and Comparative Examples A-C demonstrate the advantages of the inventive abrasive articles when employed to refine the surface of painted automotive panels. The compositions of Examples 1-6 and Comparative Example A are shown in Table 3.
A barrier coating composition consisting of 100% HYCAR™ 2679 was employed in the roll coating and spray coating processes to make foraminous barrier coatings. When the knife coating process was employed, a thickened barrier coating composition further consisting of 91.120% HYCAR™ 2679, 5.304% water, 0.152% FLUORAD™ FC 129, 3.152% CARBOPOL™ EZ-1 (4% in water), and 0.273% ammonium hydroxide solution was used to apply an impervious barrier coating. The selected barrier coating composition was applied to each foam backing by either a roll coating process, a spray coating process, or a knife coating process as indicated in Table 3.
The roll coating process was used to generate a foraminous barrier coat and employed 7.6 cm diameter rolls (one with a rubber surface and one with a steel surface) gapped to about 0.38 mm less than the thickness of the foam to be coated. The coating pan was filled with the barrier coating composition and the coater set to operate at 3 to 4.5 m/min. The various foam backing sheets (1 m×0.3 m) were then introduced into the nip. Upon exiting the nip area, each coated backing was impinged by an air flow to break any bubbles resulting from the coater. The sheets were then placed in an oven set at 120-150° C. for about 6 minutes.
The spray coating process was used to generate a foraminous barrier coat and employed a conveyor belt traversing under a reciprocating spray nozzle and subsequent radiant heater sufficient to achieve a temperature at the backing surface of about 120° C. The conveyor speed was controlled to provide the required add-on as reported in Table 3.
The knife coating process was used to generate impervious barrier coatings on selected backings. The 1 m×0.3 m foam backing specimens were drawn by hand at about 10 m/minute through a knife coater having the coating knife adjusted to barely touch the backing surface. An approximate 50 ml aliquot of thickened barrier coating composition was placed before the leading edge of the knife. The knife position was adjusted to achieve the required add-on. The coated backing was then placed in an oven set at 150° C. for about 6 minutes.
After the appropriate barrier coating was applied, an abrasive slurry formed by mixing 19.47 parts SR 351, 12.94 parts SR 339, 3.08 parts PD 9000, 1.93 part A-174™, 1.08 part TPO-L, and 61.50 parts Green SiC was applied. The slurry was applied via knife coating to a polypropylene tool having a patterned surface, the patterned surface being the reverse pattern of that desired for the shaped abrasive surface, and being made by use of a pattern roll depicted in
Example 6 was further needle tacked to render foraminous the otherwise impervious barrier coated article. The abrasive composition was needled from the abrasive side with a staggered 20×20 array of needles (Foster 15×18×25×3.5 RB) deployed in a standard needle board with rows and columns being spaced ½ inch (1 cm) apart and operated at 37 strokes per 10 inch (25 cm) length (1.46 stroke per cm) to provide about 148 penetrations per square inch (23 penetrations per cm2). Such needles and needle board may be obtained from Foster Needle Company, Inc., Manitowoc, Wis. Needle tacking provided the requisite porosity for the successful employment of the otherwise unacceptable abrasive article, as indicated by comparison with Comparative Example A, that is identical to Example 6, but without the needling step.
The resulting abrasive products were then ready for conversion to six inch (15 cm) diameter discs for comparative testing.
Examples 7-9 demonstrate the preparation and efficacious performance of abrasive articles of the present invention when made using convoluted open cell foam backings.
Examples 7-9 were made according to the procedure described for Examples 1-6 employing roll coating to provide the barrier coating except for the use of a production tool having a different geometry from that of the previous examples. Example 7 used a polyester polyurethane open cell foam backing with planar major surfaces available from illbruck, Inc. as “R600U-090.” Examples 8 and 9 used a convoluted polyester polyurethane open cell foams “PPF8” and “R400U,” respectively, having an array of 20 mm base diameter, 2 mm high projecting portions on the first major surface spaced 25 mm apart, and a thickness measured from the distal ends of the projection on the first major surface to the second major surface of 5 mm. The second major surface was essentially planar. The convoluted foam for Examples 8 and 9 was obtained from illbruck under the illbruck designation “Mini-Standard.” Examples 7-9 are further described in Table 3. Comparative test results are reported in Table 4.
Comparative Example B was a 6 inch diameter (15 cm) abrasive finishing disc available under the trade designation Abralon™ 2000 from Mirka Abrasives Incorporated, Twinsburg, Ohio.
Comparative Example C was a 6 inch diameter (15 cm) abrasive finishing disc available under the trade designation BUFLEX™ PN 192-1501 from Eagle Abrasives Incorporated, Norcross, Ga.
Material
AOEM clear coated black painted cold roll steel test panels obtained from Advanced Coating Technologies Laboratories, Inc., Hillsdale, Mich. having dimensions of 18 inches (45.7 cm by 61 cm).
Fine finish orbital sander available from Dynabrade, Inc. of Clarence, N.Y. under the trade designation Dynorbital™ Model No. 56964 equipped with a 3M™ Hookit™ II 6 inch (15.2 cm) diameter backup pad. spray bottle.
Water spray bottle.
Stopwatch
Profilometer available from Federal Products Corporation an Esterline Company of Providence, R.I under the trade designation Pocket Surf™ profilometer.
Panel Preparation
The painted panels deployed horizontally in their long dimension were first prepared by sanding their surfaces using the fine finish sander and 3M™ Hookit™ II Finishing Film Discs, grade P1500, available from 3M Company under the trade designation 3M™ Hookit™ II Finishing Film Discs. The orbital sander was operated at a line pressure of 50 psi (3.52 kg/cm2) using moderate but consistent downward pressure. Each sweep of the sander was overlapped by 50% with the pad half off the panel on the first and last sweep. Sanding was started in the upper left hand corner of the test panel and the sanding pad was moved back and forth across the panel, moving from top to bottom, ending at the lower right corner after a total of seven sweeps. The sander was then moved in a reverse pattern, back up the panel in seven sweeps, ending at the starting point. The same sanding disc was then moved in a vertical path from the upper left corner, sweeping vertically, moving from left to right ending, after nine sweeps, at the lower right hand panel corner. The sander was then moved in a reverse pattern, back across the panel in nine sweeps, ending at the starting point. A new P1500 abrasive disc was then used, starting at the lower right panel corner and finishing at the upper left corner after seven horizontal sweeps. The sander was moved from the upper left corner horizontally moving back down the panel, ending at the lower right corner after seven sweeps. Sanding then proceeded from the lower right corner vertically across the panel, ending at the upper left corner after nine sweeps. Finally, sanding was continued vertically, starting at the upper left corner, moving from left to right, ending at the lower right in nine sweeps.
Initial Finish of Prepared Panel
Using the profilometer, the Rz in the vertical center of each vertical one-third of the panel was read. Five readings were taken in each one-third of a panel at 3 inches (7.6 cm) above and below the vertical center and at the vertical center. The average of these readings was the initial Rz for the prepared test panel.
Abrasive Product Evaluation
The test abrasive products were converted into a six inch (15.2 cm) diameter pads to which applied the 3M Hookit™ II attachment part that was engageable to its mating part on the support pad of the fine finish sander. The test pad was mounted on the support pad of the sander and was used to finish the prepared panel. The panel was considered to have 3 equal sized vertical portions. Water was sprayed over the panel in a sufficient amount to prevent chattering or sticking of the product to the panel. One test disc was used on each panel. Sanding was in a vertical direction in each one-third panel part under an applied constant hand pressure. The left most one-third portion was sanded for 10 seconds, the middle portion for 20 seconds and the right portion for 30 seconds. Three panels were sanded for each test product. The Rz of each sanded portion was measured in each vertical portion at 5 points, at the vertical center, 1.5 inch (3.8 cm) above and below the vertical center and 3.0 inches (7.6 cm) above and below the vertical center. The average Rz for each sanding time is then reported with the initial Rz. The results are shown in Table 4.
It can be seen that the abrasive products of the present invention provide a lower Rz faster than comparatives B and C. The products of the invention are also easier to handle during use.
The present invention has now been described with reference to several embodiments thereof It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes can be made in the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the structures described herein, but rather by the structures described by the language of the claims, and the equivalents of those structures.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/706,033, filed Nov. 3, 2000 now abandoned and Ser. No. 09/850,661, filed May 7, 2001 now abandoned, incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4055029 | Kalbow | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4311489 | Kressner | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4318766 | Smith | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4652275 | Bloecher et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4751138 | Tumey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4799939 | Bloecher et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4903440 | Kirk et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4985340 | Palazzotto et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5014468 | Ravipati et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5152917 | Pieper et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5236472 | Kirk et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5396737 | Englund et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5435816 | Spurgeon et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5667541 | Klun et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5849051 | Beardsley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5910471 | Christianson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5958794 | Bruxvoort et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6007590 | Sanders, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6024634 | Hoglund et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6059850 | Lise et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6375559 | James et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6769969 | Duescher | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| G 94 07 622.7 | Aug 1994 | DE |
| 0 306 162 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0 316 161 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0 771 613 | Oct 1996 | EP |
| WO9742004 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 0003840 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0242034 | May 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030049995 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09706033 | Nov 2000 | US |
| Child | 10137134 | US | |
| Parent | 09850661 | May 2001 | US |
| Child | 09706033 | US |
