Ventricular catheters are typically used for monitoring pressure and draining fluid (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid) in mammalian bodies, an example of which is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,673,022, the contents of which are incorporated by reference. Hence, these catheters typically have one or more passages within them to allow for drainage, air communication, wires or other components.
The ventricular catheter for intracranial use is typically fixed in place with a bolt and compression fitting. One end of the bolt is screwed into or otherwise fixed in the skull of a patient and the other end of the bolt connects to the compression fitting. Once the catheter has been placed in the brain, the compression fitting is tightened to fix the location of the catheter relative to the bolt to prevent axial movement of the catheter within the patient. Since the compression fitting applies pressure to a portion of the catheter, an exoskeleton or similar rigid support structure must be placed over any portion of the catheter that may be contacted by the compression element. This exoskeleton or rigid support structure prevents the catheter's lumen (e.g., such as a drainage lumen) from collapsing.
Previous exoskeleton designs have employed a rigid sleeve or support tube fixed over that portion of the catheter that may be subjected to the force of the compression fitting. This rigid sleeve prevents collapse of the catheter lumens but also remains relatively unbendable. In this respect, the rigid tube maintains the orientation of the catheter in line with the axis of the passage through the bolt and compression fittings. Since the length that the catheter that must be advanced into the brain varies from person to person, the rigid tube must be long enough to accommodate these various catheter positions. Hence, the rigid tube causes at least a portion of the catheter to rigidly stick up from the bolt and compression fitting.
In some arrangements of this system, the bolt, fitting and catheter can rigidly extend away from the patient for some distance. For example, the bolt and fitting may extend above the scalp about 1.5 inches while the rigid tube extends above the bolt by another 1 inch.
This combined length of the bolt, the fitting and the rigid tube is problematic for at least two reasons. First, it increases the likelihood that the assembly will be inadvertently hit. For example, the catheter provides a longer and more rigid area for a nurse or agitated patient to contact.
Second, the length of the tube increases the length of the lever arm which conveys torque to the skull. In this respect, the force of contact from the rigid tube is much greater than it would be against the bolt alone. In some cases, the torque increase allows even a relatively minor force to pop out the bolt from the skull, causing serious complications.
In addition to torque forces, the increased area of the rigid tube may increase the likelihood of applying downward, axial force on the catheter. This force may overcome the holding force of the compression fitting, pushing the catheter into the patient's brain and likely causing damage.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an exoskeleton consisting of a thin-walled spiral-cut sleeve or series of rings is placed on a portion of a ventricular catheter that may be moved into the compression fitting (or similar securing mechanism) of a bolt in a patient. The exoskeleton prevents the compression fitting from collapsing the lumens (e.g., the drainage lumen) of the catheter. Spacing between the rigid areas (such as a spiral cut) allows the exoskeleton to flex axially so that the catheter can bend freely. The flexibility of the exoskeleton lowers the profile of the system and precludes the possibility that a downward force on the catheter will push the catheter into the brain.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of which embodiments of the invention are capable of will be apparent and elucidated from the following description of embodiments of the present invention, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
Preferably, the exoskeleton 102 can be an integral part of the catheter 100 by, for example, adhesive bonding.
As seen in the present example, a distal section 106 of the catheter 100 includes a plurality of drainage apertures which connect to a drainage passage within the catheter 100. The catheter 100 preferably includes a pressure sensor 104 for measuring a pressure within a patient. A tube 108 within which the pressure signal is conveyed, splits off from the catheter 100 at splitter 112. The proximal end of the catheter is terminated in a luer fitting 110. The luer fitting is connected to a standard drainage bag system (not shown).
As best seen in
As previously discussed, prior art exoskeletons are rigid, especially along the length that is squeezed or pressed on by the compression fitting 114. This leaves the prior art exoskeletons unable to bend. However, the exoskeleton 102 resists crushing while allowing flexibility (i.e., axial flexibility along a length of said exoskeleton 102) by preferably includes a plurality of rigid sections or areas that are interspersed with non-rigid areas or even no material. These rigid sections can be connected together as a unitary rigid element or can be distinct from each other. The rigid sections are arranged along the length of the exoskeleton 102 to withstand being crushed by a radial force typically generated by a compression fitting 114. Spaces between the rigid sections allow the exoskeleton 102 to flex as needed.
The width of the rigid material 102B can be varied to increase or decrease the crush resistance and flexibility of the exoskeleton 102. Generally, the flexibility can be increased and the crush resistance can be decreased by increasing the number of turns in the spiral cut 102A. Conversely, the crush resistance can be increased and the flexibility can be decreased by decreasing the number of turns in the spiral cut 102A. Preferably, the flexible section 102 sized to fit an 8 French catheter is composed of a rigid material such as polyimide with a thickness of about 0.006″. The spiral cut 102A is preferably about 0.01″ wide and forms about 10 turns per inch.
Preferably, the exoskeleton 102 can be formed by cutting the spiral cut 102A into the tube via a laser or mechanical cutting device. Alternately, this spiral shape can be preformed by molding techniques.
While a spiral cut 102A has been described, it should be understood that other cut shapes are contemplated within the present invention. For example, right angle cuts forming a stair pattern, a spiral wave pattern, a circumferential wave pattern, or similar variations on these patterns.
Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
This application claims priority to International patent Application No. PCT/US2010/023777, International Filing Date 10 Feb. 2010, entitled Flexible Anti-Collapsible Catheter Sleeve, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/431,631 filed Apr. 28, 2009 entitled Flexible Anti-Collapsible Catheter Sleeve (now abandoned), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/151,415 filed Feb. 10, 2009 entitled Flexible Anti-Collapse Catheter Sleeve, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/023777 | 2/10/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/14/2011 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61151415 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61151415 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12431631 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 13148944 | US |