This invention relates to a flexible assembly for connecting sprinklers to branch lines in a fire suppression system.
Fire suppression sprinkler systems used, for example, in structures such as office buildings, hotels, warehouses and private residences have a piping network comprising a riser pipe connected to a source of pressurized fire suppressing fluid, for example, a liquid, such as water, or a gas, such as halon. Branch pipe lines are connected to the riser pipe at each floor of the structure and extend throughout each floor so that fire suppressing fluid may be delivered through the branch lines to any location on each floor. The branch lines are usually suspended on hangers attached to the structural ceiling of each floor. Sprinklers, which serve to discharge the fluid in the event of a fire, are connected to the branch lines by flexible conduits. The use of flexible conduits provides a great advantage as it allows the position of the sprinklers to be easily adjusted, both laterally and vertically, in relation to the decorative ceiling which may be suspended beneath the structural ceiling of each floor. The flexible conduit saves time during installation, as it obviates the need for the technician to install a rigid pipe assembly, comprised of couplings and pipe segments, to connect the branch line to each sprinkler head on the floor. With a rigid pipe assembly even a minor miscalculation, either in the design or installation, can be aesthetically and functionally unacceptable, and require a redesign and reinstallation.
Although advantageous, flexible conduits used to connect sprinklers to branch lines of fire suppression systems have certain drawbacks. For example, one disadvantage which occurs when flexible conduits are used is the problem of over-torquing the conduit. The sprinklers may have threaded connections and torque is applied to connect them to the end of the flexible conduit. Torque inadvertently applied to the conduit during installation of the sprinkler may cause leaks to occur, for example, at the fitting where the conduit is connected to the branch line. Additionally, torque may be applied to the flexible conduit as a result of a seismic event such as an earthquake due to relative motion between the branch line and the sprinkler. If the applied torque damages the flexible conduit, causing it to leak, that may prevent fire suppressing fluid from reaching other parts of the system where a fire has broken out as a result of the event. It is advantageous to avoid applying torque to the flexible conduit to avoid damage. There is clearly a need for a flexible assembly which avoids the disadvantages associated with known flexible conduit.
The invention concerns an assembly for connecting a sprinkler to a branch line of a fire suppression system. In one example embodiment, the assembly comprises a flexible conduit having a first end connectable to the branch line, and a second end connectable to the sprinkler. The flexible conduit has a corrugated outer surface. The corrugated outer surface comprises a plurality of first crests and troughs extending circumferentially around and defining a central space. The flexible conduit provides fluid communication between the branch line and the sprinkler. An adapter is positioned between the sprinkler and the second end of the flexible conduit for effecting attachment of the sprinkler to the flexible conduit. A sleeve co-axially surrounds a portion of the flexible conduit proximate to the adapter. The sleeve has a corrugated inwardly facing surface comprising a plurality of second crests and troughs extending circumferentially and spaced so as to fit within the first crests and troughs and thereby prevent axial sliding motion of the sleeve relatively to the conduit. The sleeve and the flexible conduit are rotatable relatively to one another thereby preventing torque being applied to the flexible conduit through the sleeve.
In a particular example embodiment, the sleeve comprises a plurality of flat outwardly facing surfaces. In a specific example, the sleeve comprises six flat outwardly facing surfaces forming a hexagonal cross section. The sleeve may also comprise a unitary body having a first longitudinally extending edge and a second longitudinally extending edge in facing relation with the first longitudinally extending edge. The first longitudinally extending edge is positioned in spaced relation to the second longitudinally extending edge so as to define a gap therebetween.
In another example embodiment of an assembly for connecting a sprinkler to a branch line of a fire suppression system, the assembly comprises a flexible conduit having a first end connectable to the branch line, and a second end connectable to the sprinkler. The flexible conduit has a corrugated outer surface. The corrugated outer surface comprises a plurality of first crests and troughs extending helically around and defining a central space. The flexible conduit provides fluid communication between the branch line and the sprinkler. An adapter is positioned between the sprinkler and the second end of the flexible conduit for effecting attachment of the sprinkler to the flexible conduit. A sleeve co-axially surrounds a portion of the flexible conduit proximate to the adapter. The sleeve has a corrugated inwardly facing surface comprising a plurality of second crests and troughs extending helically and spaced so as to fit within the first crests and troughs and thereby prevent axial sliding motion of the sleeve relatively to the conduit. The sleeve and the flexible conduit are rotatable relatively to one another thereby preventing torque being applied to the flexible conduit through the sleeve.
In a particular example embodiment, the sleeve comprises a plurality of flat outwardly facing surfaces. In a specific example, the sleeve comprises six flat outwardly facing surfaces forming a hexagonal cross section. The sleeve may also comprise a unitary body having a first longitudinally extending edge and a second longitudinally extending edge in facing relation with the first longitudinally extending edge. The first longitudinally extending edge is positioned in spaced relation to the second longitudinally extending edge so as to define a gap therebetween.
With reference again to the exploded view of
Adapter portions 68 and 70 are rotatable relatively to one another about a longitudinal axis 74 concentric with the bore 66. By allowing the adapter portions to rotate relatively to one another, application of torque to the conduit 16 about axis 74 is prevented, for example, when attaching the sprinkler 14 to the adapter, or when mounting the adapter onto a bracket or other support (see also
As shown in detail in
In the embodiment shown in
In another assembly embodiment, shown in
The embodiments provided herein show union joints by way of example, it being understood that other types of connections, such as fixed NPT sprinkler outlets, swivel sprinkler outlets as well as NPT adapters are also feasible for use with the assembly according to the invention.
The assembly for connecting a sprinkler to a branch line of a fire suppression system according to the invention will provide numerous advantages over the prior art. The assembly is easy to install on a branch line and provides great adjustability of the final position of the sprinkler, thereby simplifying design and installation tasks. It is much more difficult to over-torque the assembly due to the rotational freedom afforded by the rotatable adapter or the sleeve, resulting in a significantly decreased potential for damage upon installation or during a seismic event. Additionally, the assembly can be pressure loss tested as a unit (with or without the sprinkler installed) thereby providing the system designer one equivalent length number indicative of head loss instead of resorting to calculating the equivalent length as the sum of equivalent lengths for each component of the assembly. This should improve the accuracy of hydraulic calculations. Furthermore, the entire assembly, including the sprinkler head, may be K-factor tested which will provide a single, simplified K-factor number of increased accuracy, the K-factor being a constant of proportionality used to determine the flow rate of a nozzle as a function of the square root of the pressure at the nozzle.
While the example assembly embodiments disclosed herein are described in the context of a fire suppression system, it is understood that the descriptions are examples and that the assembly embodiments disclosed herein may also be used with other systems, such as hydronic systems, where a fluid is conveyed by a flexible conduit which it is desired to isolate from unwanted and potentially damaging applied torques.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/709,313, filed Dec. 10, 2012, now abandoned, which is based upon and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/877,357, filed Sep. 8, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,336,920, which is based upon and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/241,615 filed Sep. 11, 2009 all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1349586 | Siegel | Aug 1920 | A |
2366067 | Smith | Dec 1944 | A |
2758612 | Holmgren | Jun 1965 | A |
3186438 | Holmgren | Jun 1965 | A |
3672705 | Rush | Jun 1972 | A |
3785682 | Schaller | Jan 1974 | A |
3924661 | Bornhoffer | Dec 1975 | A |
4243253 | Rogers | Jan 1981 | A |
4273365 | Hagar | Jun 1981 | A |
4273367 | Keeney et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4415389 | Medford | Nov 1983 | A |
4647074 | Pate et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4766662 | Bradshaw et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4783100 | Klein | Nov 1988 | A |
4785887 | Miller | Nov 1988 | A |
4964470 | Gaulin | Oct 1990 | A |
4998755 | Reeder | Mar 1991 | A |
5040729 | Carrozza | Aug 1991 | A |
5178422 | Sekerchak | Jan 1993 | A |
5201554 | Gagg et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5242112 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5277459 | Braun et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5316348 | Franklin | May 1994 | A |
5327976 | Hattori | Jul 1994 | A |
5396959 | MacDonald | Mar 1995 | A |
5553893 | Foti | Sep 1996 | A |
5816622 | Carter | Oct 1998 | A |
5842526 | Archer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857711 | Comin-Dunong et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6076608 | MacDonald, III et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6119784 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123154 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6158519 | Kretschmer | Dec 2000 | A |
6488097 | MacDonald, III et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6691790 | MacDonald, III et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6752218 | MacDonald, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6907938 | MacDonald, III et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7032680 | MacDonald, III et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7100947 | Freudinger | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7296634 | MacDonald, III et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7373720 | Jensen et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7735787 | Kafenshtok et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7784746 | Kafenshtok et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8205804 | Parker | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020195817 | Choi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030066658 | MacDonald, III et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040026533 | MacDonald, III et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040177976 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050194153 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070095548 | MacDonald, III et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080066932 | MacDonald, III et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080110518 | Hamilton | May 2008 | A1 |
20080230238 | Jackson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236847 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257567 | MacDonald et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86104733 | Jan 1987 | CN |
101520116 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2122057 | Aug 1972 | FR |
777749 | Jun 1957 | GB |
2178125 | Feb 1987 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Dauvergne, Bertrand; First Office Action from corresponding European patent application No. 10816002.9; Sep. 2, 2013; pp. 1-4; European Patent Office; Munich, Germany. |
(Copenheaver, Blaine R.); International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2010/048083; Nov. 12, 2010. |
Haiyan, Wen; Search Report from corresponding Chinese patent application No. 201310597564.3; pp. 1-2; Mar. 24, 2015; Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China. |
Dauvergne, Bertrand; European Search Report from corresponding European patent application No. 14168817.6; pp. 1-2; Sep. 4, 2014; European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. |
Dauvergne, Bertrand; Written Opinion from corresponding European patent application No. 14168817.6; pp. 1-3; Sep. 4, 2014; European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130233430 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61241615 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12877357 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13709313 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13709313 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13873505 | US |