The present invention relates to flexible cables and, in particular, multi-conductor cables for use in a mechanical cable track.
Cables are made in various ways, using materials and processes suitable for the internal and external mechanical, environmental and Listing Agency standards and requirements. Combinations of conductors are also assembled, using various methods to produce constructions with unique properties and performance characteristics, including those necessary to survive flexing applications. This area of practice and these methods are all well documented.
The prior art includes mechanical cable tracks that house various electrical as well as hydraulic lines used to carry power from one point to another on construction equipment. Specifically, lift devices of the kind used to lift a worker to some height and allow specific tasks to be performed. These tasks, along with the control of the unit itself, require the use of various single and multi-conductor cables. Multiple electrical conductors under one protective jacket is an efficient means of bundling the number of wires needed in a compact design, as well as providing efficient means of connecting the cables. The flexible track space is minimized, for cost and space reasons, so efficient use of that space is important. Since the track provides the power and control of the unit, and the unit is run by one person from the basket, durability and reliability of the cables are critical.
Applicant has conducted extensive research and development as to the superior construction of a cable in such an environment as described herein.
In one prior art embodiment, the track application involves link type tracks which the industry refers to as “C” tracks.
During the contraction mode the cable is allowed to relax. However, no reversal of the forces implied on the cable occurs. Therefore, the stresses on the cable are only and always in one direction, e.g., the extension mode of the unit. Conventional wisdom would attempt to describe the force applied to the cable as torsional in nature. This false conclusion is suggested after observation of the cable. In particular, the cables take on a twisted or ropey appearance which occurs when cables experience excessive torsional load or forces. However, the applicant has discovered that the force applied is not torsional. The force can best be described as a wiping or “milking” force applied to the cables outer contact surface, such as seen in
The prior art includes multi-conductor cables produced with a conductor lay length to allow the cable to withstand repeated flexing. In particular, the conductor lay or spiral allows the conductor to avoid being stressed in the same place and in the same plane repetitively. However, if the conductor is subjected to a tightening of the lay, such that the conductor exhibits what the industry refers to as a “Z” kink, the conductors will be effectively locked in a position. As a result, the conductor will be subjected to damage. The damage is a result of the copper strands being subjected to flexing and stressing that causes the conductor to be work-hardened and to lose elongation. The loss of elongation and work hardening leads to conductor breakage and electrical failure.
Applicant conducted research into the impact of wiping upon a cable, with multiple conductors and made with a specific lay length. In particular, after track testing, the lay length can be re-measured and the effects recorded. What was found by Applicant was a lengthening of lay followed abruptly by a reduction in lay length. The effects are also visible on the outside of the cable. That is, the cable assumes a twisting or rope like appearance. This appearance is actually the result of a lengthening of lay length in one spot followed by a tightening or accumulating of lay length in an adjacent spot. These intervals of tightening and accumulating will repeat along the length of the cable that has experienced the track effect and will not occur where the same cable length has not experienced this contact. Where contra-helical conductor layers are utilized, the force (track wiping) can be transferred from the outer conductor layer to the layer just underneath it, since the layers are wound in opposite directions, the outer layer can force the inner layer conductors to buckle (this has been observed in actual track testing). In the most extreme circumstances of the “tightening” (or more accurately the accumulation or reduction) of the lay, the effect is so extreme as to create a bunching up of the conductors. Where no lay length is evident, the conductors cannot wipe down any further and the conductors can be the subject of damage as a result of this bend. The industry refers to this as a “Z” kink.
The present invention provides a flexible multi-conductor cable and a method of manufacturing a flexible multi-conductor cable, wherein the cable is adapted for use, particularly, in a mechanical cable track. The material of the cable is preferably selected so that the cable is capable of surviving the external physical requirements of a mechanical cable track, as well as to: prevent the transfer of the wiping effect onto the conductors; allow low friction intimate contact with insulated conductors and conductor layers; prevent compression of the inner conductor layers creating the opportunity for Z kinking by a single conductor or multiple conductors; and be suitable for smooth surface abrasion applications. In one embodiment, the cable includes 18 AWG or larger conductors for power and control applications. The cable is designed to withstand prolonged exposure to −40° C. temperatures with no movement of the cable followed by repeated extension and contraction cycles. Further, the cable is designed to withstand UV exposure, weather, dust and dirt, concrete, and the casual oil or grease contact.
As noted above,
The articulated boom 14 is shown in
The dual layer jacket 22 includes a material which resists track abrading on the outer layer 24 of the jacket 22 and a material which resists stretching on the inner layer 26 of the jacket 22. Both materials include a formula of thermoplastic elastomers (TPE). However, the properties of the inner layer 26 and the outer layer 24 differ in order to achieve the objective of the present invention. In particular, the material of the inner layer 26 is provided with a high tensile modulus to resist stretching forces externally applied to the cable. In comparison, the material of the outer layer 24 is provided with a low tensile modulus to avoid breakdown and cracking as the cable is wiped or rubbed against external surfaces. In one embodiment, the tensile modulus of the inner layer 26 is 1572 psi and the tensile modulus of the outer layer 24 is 1232 psi. It will be appreciated that in this just noted embodiment, the tensile modulus of the inner layer 26 is 27.6% greater in comparison to the outer layer 24.
The tensile and elongation properties of the inner layer 26 and outer layer 24 are chosen to withstand the environment of the noted application.
By co-extruding the two materials together, the finished cable 20 is able to withstand all subject forces and exposures. Since the materials are similar in base chemistry, no bonding agents or bonding layers are necessary. Since the materials are substantial in their specific properties, there is no need for additional layers of materials or other means required to obtain suitable cable performance. For instance, it is not necessary to include inner jacket layers, binders, braids or other mechanical components. Some binders or wraps may be used for holding one group together during the manufacturing process, or to reduce friction between members, but these additions are not required to improve the cables ability to withstand the wiping of the track. The combination of materials is so resistant that good cable geometry and design are not required. That is, the absence of spaces between components, contra-helical conductor layers and perfect conductor count are not required. For example, in the embodiment shown in
The following chart shows the properties of the inner layer 26 and outer layer 24 of the jacket 22, for one embodiment of the present invention.
It will be understood that modifications and variations may be effected without departing from the scope of the novel concepts of the present invention, but it is understood that this application is limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/156,675, filed Mar. 2, 2009.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/067330 | 12/9/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/23/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/104538 | 9/16/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2718544 | Shepp | Sep 1955 | A |
2744153 | Flood | May 1956 | A |
2856453 | Shepp | Oct 1958 | A |
3013109 | Gorman et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3209064 | Cutler | Sep 1965 | A |
3710007 | Hoeg et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3805218 | Voida | Apr 1974 | A |
3993860 | Snow et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4125741 | Wahl et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4196307 | Moore et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4443657 | Hill et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4486623 | Ploppa | Dec 1984 | A |
4538022 | Barnicol-Ottler et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4645298 | Gartside, III | Feb 1987 | A |
4654476 | Barnicol-Ottler et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4658089 | Guzy et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4675475 | Bortner et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4687294 | Angeles | Aug 1987 | A |
4732628 | Dienes | Mar 1988 | A |
4789589 | Baxter | Dec 1988 | A |
5043037 | Buckland | Aug 1991 | A |
5043530 | Davies | Aug 1991 | A |
5113040 | Hose et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114746 | O'Leary et al. | May 1992 | A |
5173960 | Dickinson | Dec 1992 | A |
5192834 | Yamanishi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210377 | Kennedy et al. | May 1993 | A |
5220130 | Walters | Jun 1993 | A |
5238328 | Adams et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5280137 | Ward | Jan 1994 | A |
5313020 | Sackett | May 1994 | A |
5669517 | Donaldson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5750931 | McGregor et al. | May 1998 | A |
6140587 | Sackett | Oct 2000 | A |
6160940 | Summers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180721 | Rogestedt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184473 | Reece et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6362432 | LaPidus et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6469251 | Dupuis | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6519396 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6528730 | Persson | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6573456 | Spruell et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6861143 | Castellani et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897382 | Hager et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7105749 | Belli et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123801 | Fitz | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132604 | Scheidecker et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7180000 | Hager et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7759580 | Park et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010040042 | Stipes | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020096356 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040050580 | Hager et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055771 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050077066 | Stipes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087360 | Speer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060021772 | Dellagala et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060237219 | Glew | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0751535 | Jan 1997 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110303487 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61156675 | Mar 2009 | US |