This invention relates to a flexible catheter tube which is capable of transmitting rotary and axial motion to resolve blockages in a body lumen such as a blood vessel.
For well over fifty years, there has been a need to create a flexible tube from an otherwise stiff tube by cutting the tube along the length. There are many examples of this design approach for many instruments in medical devices including catheters and guidewires (U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,520), bone reamers (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,108,411 and 6,053,922) and other non-medical applications such flexible drill bores for well drilling (U.S. Pat. No. 2,515,365).
Flexible shafts and couplings are used to transmit rotary power between a power source and a driven part when a straight, unobstructed path is unavailable. A flexible shaft generally consists of rotating shaft with end fittings for attachment to mating parts which together construct a device. The power source is anything which can transmit the correct forces including a motor or a physician's hand. The shaft is envisioned to be used to transmit motion in a curvilinear manner such as a catheter shaft delivered through the iliac arch in the hip region, or for use as a bone reamer with flexible medullary canal reamers.
Historically, flexible shafts have been comprised of braided wire, slotted tubing, wound wire, or small diameter polymer tubing. Small diameter polymer tubing is not considered an ideal option for some applications due to a lack of pushability and high risk of kinking. This ability to transmit energy from one end of the shaft to the other is considered one of the most important characteristics when maneuvering through long, tortuous vessels. Hypotube-based shafts with a slotted or spiral cut pattern can extend the traditional limits of metal shafts, but continue to present limitations with flexibility and torque transmission. The traditional spiral cut pattern, for example, tends to wind up when torqued such that a one revolution turn at the torqued, or proximal end does not equal a one revolution turn at the non-torqued or distal end; in the worst cases, a one revolution turn results in a less than one-quarter of a revolution or less. The standard slotted pattern with no or limited male-female portion has better torqueability, but often limited bend radius along one or more planes.
Catheters and guidewires can include a full or portion of a shaft that is both flexible and torqueable or has a gradient of flexibility and torqueability along the length of the shaft. For optimal steerability and pushability, most catheter designs must have a maximum torsional rigidity while retaining a satisfactory kink-resistance and flexibility. These shafts can be used in many catheters and introducers including those for balloon angioplasty, stent delivery, electrophysiology applications, drug delivery or infusion, atherectomy, crossing catheters, or endovascular surgery. Depending on the application, the optimized and gradation of the flexibility and torqueability can be further modified by having a tube within a tube where the inside or outside tube or both can be comprised of a cut tube of this invention.
Chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains one of the most challenging pathologies encountered by surgeons and interventionalists alike. CTO is characterized by heavy atherosclerotic plaque burden resulting in complete, or near complete occlusion of a vessel for at least 1-3 months. CTO can occur in any part of the arterial vasculature, however, it is most common in the legs and other arteries near the heart. Chronic occlusions are present in up to 40% of patients who undergo treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) and have been cited as one of the primary reasons for procedural failures. PAD is a prevalent condition, affecting about 10 million individuals in the United States and over 27 million individuals worldwide. CTO is also prolific in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the number one cause of death in the U.S. in both men and women, killing over 400,000 each year. Approximately 30% of all coronary angiograms in patients with coronary artery disease will show a CTO.
Restoring blood flow to the affected area is essential for improving blood supply and tissue perfusion to prevent limb amputation, heart failure and other clinical symptoms associated with these diseases. There are presently two predominate treatment strategies for CTO: bypass surgery or percutaneous recanalization. Until recently, CTOs of the coronary arteries were almost entirely referred for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures, or many were left untreated because of the high risk and uncertainty regarding CABG success rates. With a failure rate of up to 30%, recanalization poses its own set of technical challenges. A tough, fibrous cap is often present at the proximal and distal ends of the CTO with softer material in between. The majority of recanalization failures are due to an inability to cross the occlusion with the guidewire and balloon technologies currently available. Despite these challenges percutaneous revascularization has been associated with reduced angina, improved left ventricular function, reduced arrhythmias, and reduced mortality. Further innovations and refinement of current crossing catheter technologies are essential to increase procedural success in crossing long, calcified CTOs. Although the worst case for crossing a blocked vessel may be crossing one with a CTO, the intent of the invention is also for use for partial occlusions or simply crossing tortuous anatomy since the given construction can enable optimal performance in many applications.
The invention provides a flexible, elongated catheter tube having distal and proximal ends and a laser cut section there between. The laser cut section makes up a majority of the catheter length and is cut in a continuous helical pattern forming interlocking teeth which can be sinusoidal, triangular, square or likes shapes, preferably sinusoidal, wherein: (i) the interlocking teeth have a diameter of about 0.005 to about 0.015 inch, preferably from about 0.007 to about 0.015 inch; (ii) the helical angle of the center-line of the laser cut is a constant angle between about 64° and about 75°; (iii) the pitch between adjacent rows of teeth is in the range of about 0.028 to about 0.057 inch; (iv) the diameter of said teeth, the helical angle and the pitch resulting in from 4 to 12 repetitions of the teeth around the circumference of the laser cut section; and (v) the outside diameter of the tube is in the range of about 0.010 to about 0.052 inch and the wall thickness is about 0.001 to about 0.005, preferably 0.0015 inch.
The interior of the catheter tube has a polymeric bi-layer of a nylon or like polymer at the interface of the tube interior and a Teflon or like polymer forms the interior lumen of the catheter. The exterior of the tube has a thin polymer coating of nylon or the like.
The proximal end of the catheter is uncut and configured for coupling to a luer connection. A short portion of the distal end is also uncut and is followed by a narrower terminal section about 0.149 inch or less in length which can be tapered for better blockage penetration.
In operation, the interlocking teeth disengage and reengage in a fish scale manner without undergoing significant plastic deformation and without substantial polymer separation when the catheter is flexed as it travels through a body lumen such as a blood vessel. The catheter is thus capable of transmitting an axial, push force against a vascular occlusion to cross same and allow the catheter to advance beyond the occlusion.
The invention also provides a process for resolving partial or total body lumen blockages or occlusions which includes inserting the catheter described above into body lumen having a blockage at a distal location and advancing the catheter through the body lumen until said distal end encounters the blockage. The interlocking teeth disengage and reengage in a fish scale manner without undergoing plastic deformation and without substantial polymer separation when the catheter is flexed during advancement thru the body lumen. An axial push force is transmitted from the proximal end of the catheter to the distal end to cross the blockage and allow the catheter to advance there beyond.
The invention further provides catheter tube which in cross section has an inside diameter of not less than about 0.010 inch, a polymeric bi-layer of a nylon polymer at the interface of the tube interior, a Teflon polymer forming the interior lumen of the catheter and a thin polymer exterior coating of a nylon or like polymer. The wall thickness of the catheter with inner layers and an outer coating is about 0.0015 to 0.010, preferably 0.007 inch.
The invention will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings wherein:
The catheter of the invention provides an unexpected and surprising combination of flexibility and the ability to deliver an axial push force greater than heretofore possible against an occlusion or total blockage to cross same and allow the catheter to advance there beyond. Flexibility allows an interventional radiologist using the inventive catheter to apply a twisting force or torque while pushing the catheter forward and follow a tortuous path in a body lumen (such as the iliac arch) without kinking. The distal section can be straight or angled as is known in the art.
Once kink-free delivery of the distal end to the point of a blockage or an occlusion is accomplished, the radiologist needs to apply axial pressure against the blockage to pass through or cross same to deliver a stent or other device to resolve the occlusion or blockage. For example, calcified lesions in an artery, known as chronic total occlusions (or CTOs) often have end caps that can be significantly harder to pierce or cross than the center of a CTO.
The catheter of the invention has demonstrated the ability to cross CTOs, even those with denser end caps, by exerting an axial push force in excess of 0.15 pounds and as high as one pound and more which is greater that heretofore possible with known catheters of comparable size. The inability to cross a CTO often leads to alternate and often riskier procedures (like open-heart surgery) to resolve a CTO.
The inventive catheter gives the radiologist several options for resolving a blockage. Once a guidewire locates a blockage, the inventive catheter can be inserted over the guidewire. A short section of the guidewire protruding from and supported by the catheter can challenge the CTO, or the distal end of the catheter and guidewire can be coextensive when pushed against a blockage or the guidewire can be withdrawn and the necked-down end of the catheter can be pushed through a CTO.
The structural parameters of the catheter of the invention are critical in achieving kink-free torquing and sufficient axial force to cross body lumen blockages. For example, the interlocking sinusoidal teeth must be able to disengage and reengage for flexibility without plastic deformation. Lesser values for teeth diameter and the pitch between rows of teeth can provide flexibility, and therefore better torque response around a bend, but at a cost of catheter buckling and decreased transmission of axial force. Exceeding the same values introduces undesirable stiffness and the inability to traverse tortuous body lumens. The use of interior and exterior polymer coatings (which may extend into, interface or blend with each other through the laser cut lines) aid in allowing the teeth to unlock (flex) and interlock without plastic deformation. Thus, smaller teeth may aid flexibility but easily deform; larger teeth resist unlocking and lead to undesirable stiffness.
Referring now to the drawings,
Tube 102 has distal and proximal ends 152 and 150 and a laser cut section 154 there between enabling the transmission of rotary and axial motion from the proximal end to the distal end. The laser cut section 154 comprises a majority, i.e., from about 90 to 95%, of the catheter length and is cut in a continuous helical pattern 103 forming interlocking sinusoidal shaped teeth 109 as shown in
As shown in
The pitch 110 between adjacent rows of teeth 103 is in the range of about 0.028 to about 0.057 inch. The diameter 108 of teeth 109, helical angle 105 and pitch 110 result in from 4 to 12 repetitions of teeth 109 around the circumference of laser cut section 154.
The outside diameter of tube 102 is in the range of about 0.010 to about 0.052 inch and the wall thickness is about 0.0015 to about 0.005 inch.
Proximal end 150 (
In operation, interlocking teeth 109 disengage and reengage in a fish scale manner without undergoing plastic deformation and without substantial polymer separation when the catheter is flexed. The catheter is thus capable of transmitting an axial push force against a vascular occlusion to cross same and allow the catheter to advance beyond the occlusion.
The distal portions of the catheter can have a cutting feature or features which can be part of the catheter or a separate cannula that goes either over the outside diameter of the catheter or inside the diameter of the catheter.
A perfusion feature can be added to the catheter which enable the physician to flow liquid from the proximal end (outside of the body) to the distal end or a location or locations along the length of the catheter (
Another embodiment is a cut pattern similar to that shown in
In all embodiments, the helical angle could decrease or more likely increase from the proximal end to the distal end, or portions thereof including a center section. The helical angle shown in most drawings is 105 degrees, strictly as an example. Another example, the helical angle could start as 70 degrees and finish more distally at 112 degrees where the rate of angle change can be constant along the length or is variable. In all embodiments, the catheter can be used for CTO, partially blocked vessels, or other vessels or channels within a mammalian body. CTO is used as a difficult example or worst case under which the invention could need to perform if put into practice.
An important aspect of polymeric layers 102′, 102″ and 404 (
A specific application of catheter 100 includes supporting a guidewire or catheter while crossing plaque buildup where the plaque creates a partial blockage or a total blockage also referred to as a chronic total inclusion (CTO).
Other applications which can use catheter 100 include bone reamers and shafts for many surgery devices requiring articulated segments.
Set of three catheters in the Table 1 were tested for flexibility and peak axial push force (lbf) and compared to commercially available catheters (described below) using simulation test apparatus shown in
Formula for Scaling a Design:
(D1/D2)(T1)=T2
Maintain cut angle
Follow the above when scaling down, but when scaling up:
Maintain tooth diameter and cut angle
Increase number of repetitions:
(D1/D2)(R1)=R2
Adjust pitch as necessary to create a continuous pattern.
Pushability Test Protocol
Commercial catheters, 3 of each design, were tested against the Table 1 catheters in the test apparatus of
Control 1: A Cook CXI catheter which is a braided steel catheter (2.6 French) described as the MinaFlex 18 Microcatheter in a 510 (k) premarket notification summary submitted to the FDA by Cook International on Nov. 9, 2007 and available online from the FDA database (Ref. K072724).
Control 2: A Spectranetics Quick-Cross Support Catheter (2.1 French) which is a braided steel catheter described in a 510 (k) premarket notification summary submitted to the FDA by Spectranetics Corporation on Nov. 3, 2003 and available online from the FDA database (Ref. K033678).
Control 3: A Medtronic Total Across catheter which is a spiral cut stainless steel catheter (2.3 French) described in a 510 (k) premarket notification summary submitted to the FDA by Medtronic Vascular on Nov. 15, 2013 and available online from the FDA database (Ref. K133539) and depicted in
Test results are summarized in the bar graph of
While this invention has been described as having preferred sequences, ranges, ratios, steps, order of steps, materials, structures, symbols, indicia, graphics, color scheme(s), shapes, configurations, features, components, or designs, it is understood that it is capable of further modifications, uses and/or adaptations of the invention following in general the principle of the invention, and including such departures from the present disclosure as those come within the known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains, and as may be applied to the central features hereinbefore set forth, and fall within the scope of the invention and of the limits of the claims appended hereto or presented later. The invention, therefore, is not limited to the preferred embodiment(s) shown/described herein.
The features of the invention include:
1. Flexible catheter comprising an elongated tube having distal and proximal ends and a laser cut section there between enabling the transmission of rotary and axial motion from the proximal end to the distal end, a. said laser cut section comprising a majority of the catheter length and being cut in a continuous helical pattern forming interlocking teeth wherein: i. the interlocking teeth have a diameter of about 0.005 to about 0.015 inch; ii. the helical angle of the center-line of the helical cut is a constant angle between about 64° and about 75°; iii. the pitch between adjacent rows of teeth is in the range of about 0.028 to about 0.057 inch, the diameter of said teeth, said helical angle and said pitch resulting in from 4 to 12 repetitions of said teeth around the circumference of the laser cut section; and iv. the outside diameter of said tube is in the range of about 0.010to about 0.052 inch and the wall thickness is about 0.0015 to about 0.005 inch; b. the interior of said tube having a polymeric bi-layer of a nylon or like polymer at the interface of the tube interior and a Teflon or like polymer forming the interior lumen of the catheter; c. the exterior of said tube having a thin nylon or like polymer coating; d. said proximal end comprising an uncut portion of the tube configured for coupling to a luer connection; e. said distal end comprising a solid, uncut section no longer than about 0.02 inch followed by a narrower terminal section no longer than about 0.149 inch in length; and f. whereby said interlocking teeth disengage and reengage in a fish scale manner without undergoing significant plastic deformation and without substantial polymer separation when the catheter is flexed, and whereby said catheter is capable of transmitting an axial, push force against a vascular occlusion to cross same and allow the catheter to advance beyond the occlusion.
2. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the sinusoidal teeth have a diameter of about 0.008 inch.
3. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the outside diameter of said tube is in the range of about 0.017to about 0.052 inch.
4. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the exterior polymer coating is from about 0.0015 to about 0.004 inch.
5. Flexible catheter of claim 4 wherein the thickness of said exterior polymer coating is about 0.003 inch.
6. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the exterior polymer coating blends with the interior nylon polymer through said helical cut.
7. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the laser cut section comprises from about 95 to about 99 percent of the catheter length.
8. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the helical angle of the center-line of the sinusoidal cut is a constant angle between about 68° and about 70°.
9. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the pitch between adjacent teeth is in the range of about 0.033 to about 0.039 inch.
10. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the interior nylon polymer and the exterior nylon polymer coating are a polyether block amide with a Durometer index between 35 and 72.
11. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the interior polymer bi-layer is about 0.0025 inch thick.
12. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the Teflon polymer forming the lumen of said catheter is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) having a static coefficient of friction in the range of 0.05 to 0.08.
13. Flexible catheter of claim 12 wherein the PTFE is about 0.0005 to about 0.001 inch thick.
14. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the catheter tube is full hard 304 stainless steel.
15. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein said proximal end is adapted to allow perfusion of the catheter.
16. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the tube is nitinol, steel or other biocompatible metal.
17. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the tube is a polymer or polymer derivative.
18. Flexible catheter of claim 1 which includes a biocompatible hydrophilic coating at least at said distal end.
19. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein said proximal end includes a fitting to facilitate guidewire access through the catheter.
20. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the catheter contains holes or slits near the distal end to allow perfusion of liquid.
21. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the narrower terminal section of the distal end includes one or more V-shaped cuts for tapering the terminal section.
22. Flexible catheter of claim 1 wherein the interlocking teeth are sinusoidal, triangular or square shaped.
23 Flexible catheter tube comprising an elongated tube having distal and proximal ends and a laser cut section there between, said catheter in cross section comprising: a. an inside tube diameter of not less than about 0.010 inch and a tube wall thickness of about 0.0015 to 0.005 inch; b. a polymeric bi-layer of a nylon polymer at the interface of the tube interior and a Teflon polymer forming the interior lumen of the catheter; and c. a thin nylon polymer exterior coating.
24. Flexible catheter of claim 23 wherein the exterior coating blends with the interior nylon polymer through said laser cut.
25. Flexible catheter of claim 23 wherein said wall thickness is about 0.0015 inch.
26. Flexible catheter of claim 23 wherein the exterior coating has a thickness from about 0.0015 to about 0.003 inch.
27. Flexible catheter of claim 23 wherein the interior nylon polymer and the exterior nylon polymer coating are a polyether block amide with a Durometer index between 35 and 72.
28. Flexible catheter of claim 23 wherein the Teflon polymer forming the lumen of said catheter is polytetrafluoroethylene having a static coefficient of friction in the range of 0.05 to 0.08.
29. Process for resolving total or partial body lumen blockages which comprises inserting a catheter into body lumen having a blockage at a distal location, said catheter comprising an elongated tube having distal and proximal ends and a laser cut section there between, a. said laser cut section comprising a majority of the catheter length and being cut in a continuous helical pattern forming interlocking sinusoidal shaped teeth wherein: i. the sinusoidal teeth have a diameter of about 0.007 to about 0.015 inch; ii. the helical angle of the center-line of the sinusoidal cut is a constant angle between about 64° and about 75°; iii. the pitch between adjacent teeth is in the range of about 0.028 to about 0.057 inch, the diameter of said teeth, said helical angle and said pitch resulting in from 4 to 12 repetitions of said teeth around the circumference of the laser cut section; and iv. the outside diameter of said tube is in the range of about 0.010 to about 0.052 inch and the wall thickness is about 0.0015 to about 0.005inch; b. the interior of said tube having a polymeric bi-layer of a nylon polymer at the interface of the tube interior and a Teflon polymer forming the interior lumen of the catheter; c. the exterior of said tube having a thin nylon polymer coating; d. said proximal end comprising an uncut portion of the tube configured for coupling to a luer connection; e. said distal end comprising a solid, uncut section no longer than about 0.02 inch followed by a narrower terminal section no longer than about 0.149 inch in length; f. advancing said catheter through said body lumen until said distal end encounters the blockage, said interlocking teeth disengaging and reengaging in a fish scale pattern without undergoing significant plastic deformation and without substantial polymer separation when the catheter is flexed during advancement through the body lumen, and g. transmitting an axial, push force from the proximal end of the catheter to the distal end to cross the blockage and allow the catheter to advance therebeyond.
The present application claims priority on prior U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/274,203, filed Jan. 1, 2016, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/068646 | 12/27/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/117092 | 7/6/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2515365 | Zublin | Jul 1950 | A |
5108411 | McKenzie, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5334145 | Lundquist et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5437288 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5573520 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5683640 | Miller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5747429 | Katoh et al. | May 1998 | A |
6053922 | Krause et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6447518 | Krause | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6652508 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656195 | Peters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6921397 | Corcoran | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7300430 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7389148 | Morgan | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7413563 | Corcoran et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7625364 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7708704 | Mitelberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7763012 | Petrik et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7879022 | Bonnette et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8206370 | von Oepen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206372 | Larson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8323241 | Salahieh et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8357140 | Majercak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366559 | Papenfuss et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376865 | Forster et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8439947 | Howard et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454535 | Majercak et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8632556 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8758231 | Bunch et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9060806 | Mallik et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078740 | Steiner et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9232954 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9233255 | Hebert | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9295807 | Chin et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20020038129 | Peters et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030032970 | Hiltebrandt | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050080400 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060064123 | Bonnette et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084839 | Lentz | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084939 | Lentz | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060142696 | Kumoyama et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070088323 | Campbell | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080147001 | Al-Marashi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090099554 | Forster et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100241154 | Larson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100331776 | Salahieh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110152880 | Alvarez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120265229 | Rottenberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120303005 | Forster et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140031843 | Rottenberg et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114288 | Beasley | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135736 | Hebert | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148787 | Forster et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140235361 | Forster et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277009 | Mallik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283355 | Chin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150094656 | Salahieh | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150374398 | Tobis | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160082225 | Kobayashi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2990070 | Dec 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Prashant, PU, “Current and emerging catheter technologies for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.” Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology 2014:5 213-226. |
Javed, U, and Laird, JR, “Specialty Crossing Devices: Understanding the Learning Curve,” Endovascular Today May 2012: 52-57. |
Banerjee, A, and Brilakis, ES,“Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions,” American College of Cardiology, Jun. 9, 2015, 11 pages, accessed Mar. 16, 2017 at http://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2015/06/09/13/31/coronary-chronic-total-occlusion-interventions. |
Sianos,G, Konstantinidis, N, Di Mario, C and Karvounis, H, “Theory and practical based approach to chronic total occlusions,” Cardiovascular Disorders (2016) 16:33, 1-11. |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary. K072724. Nov. 9, 2007. 5 pages. Searchable 510(k) Database. Web. Accessed Mar. 24, 2017. <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/K072724.pdf>. |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary. K033678. Feb. 23, 2004. 5 pages. Searchable 510(k) Database. Web. Accessed Mar. 24, 2017. <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/ K033678.pdf>. |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary. K133539. Mar. 26, 2014. 7 pages. Searchable 510(k) Database. Web. Accessed Mar. 24, 2017. <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/ K133539.pdf>. |
Thomas, International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2016/068646, 18 pages (dated Mar. 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180326178 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62274203 | Jan 2016 | US |