This invention relates to a foldable boom, truss, or longeron member, collapsible truss structures and other similar structures made of such members and in particular, a flexible, rate damped deployable hinge for such structures and members.
Key optical components of large aperture, space based optical instruments may be deployed on orbit to provide an aperture large enough to increase the resolution and optical performance by several orders of magnitude. The performance of such instruments depends on maintaining the precision and stability of the deployed structural geometry to within nanometers of an ideal shape. Nonlinear contact mechanics and freedom in the components of deployed structures mean that deployed instruments will have the capacity to change shape at the micron and nanometer level of resolution. Eliminating such nonlinearities as load path friction and freeplay would enable a deployed structure to be as linear and precise as a monolithic block of material.
In most mechanically deployed structures, components are moved from their stored positions into their final operational positions by some type of actuator and then locked into place with a deployment latch. For high precision structures, it is critical that the load paths and load predictable for the reliable operation of the instrument.
Existing deployable structure joints have several limitations that either completely prevent them from being used in high precision deployable instruments or require complex analysis and additional launch mass to provide deployment actuation and post deployment locking. Hinge joints previously used in moderate precision structures have relied on high levels of preload and friction to eliminate freeplay and geometric ambiguity. These joints have been shown to be unstable at the micron level, causing the structure to “micro-lurch” or change shape and thus move the instrument's optics far out of alignment.
Existing joints for precision space structures relied on high levels of preload between the many components to eliminate gaps and free play that cause inaccuracies in the structure. Unfortunately, these high levels of preload introduce correspondingly high levels of friction both during the deployment and after deployment has been completed. Friction mechanisms are nonlinear and thus are more difficult to control and less predictable.
Other hinge designs such as latch and actuator type systems suffer from the same disadvantages.
Recently, foldable truss members have been developed so that a truss structure can be collapsed and compactly packaged to save space during delivery and then released to expand and return to its original shape in orbit. All of these mechanisms add to the mass, expense and complexity of the structure and to the difficulty and expense of transporting it. These foldable members reduce the mass (and the delivery cost) of the structure by replacing the hinge, latch and actuator mechanisms with one single device. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,334,391 incorporated herein by this reference.
Solid rods are joined on their ends forming a truss structure (a square frame for a solar panel array or a superstructure for a communications satellite antenna, for example) and pre-selected rods are cut in sections to form a hinge between the two sections. The rod sections are joined with spring steel elements similar to, if not actually, lengths of a carpenter's tape measure.
The rod sections can be folded with respect to each other by imparting a localized buckling force to one of the spring steel elements. Simply letting go of one rod section, returns the two rod sections to an end to end alignment due to the potential energy stored in the biased spring steel hinge elements.
In this way, a truss structure made up of several of these foldable rods can be designed on earth, collapsed for delivery to space, and then released once in position in space where the foldable rods flex back into position forming the truss structure designed and constructed on earth.
In use, this spring steel hinge design suffers from a number of shortcomings. First, hinges formed of spring steel elements require joining the ends of each spring steel element to a rod section. These joints and the spring steel elements themselves add significantly to the overall weight of the truss structure which is an undesired factor in space launch capability.
The spring steel elements also result in dimensionally unstable truss structures. The dimensional instability is caused by the relative motion of the internal components including the joints between the spring elements and the rod sections and permanent yielding of different areas of the spring elements themselves.
The result is that the shape of the truss structure may change when it is erected in space from the shape of the truss structure before it was collapsed on earth. This can have disastrous effects on instrument performance as even a ten nanometer to ten micrometer displacement can severely affect the performance of primary and secondary optics attached to the truss structure.
The inventors hereof have developed flexible material hinges or “strain-energy” hinges of various configurations which bend and fold and then, when released, automatically unfold. These types of hinges are used to fold and then deploy structures and structural system in which simplicity of operation and reliability of performance are greatly desired. Such systems have been used with great success in the deployment of spacecraft components such as solar arrays and antennae.
In traditional strain energy deployment, a flexible material such as a spring steel or thin fiber-reinforced plastic (composite) flexes to allow motion about a bending hinge line and is held in its stowed configuration until such time as deployment is desired. Once released, the stored strain energy in the flexed material provides the motive force to unfold the structure. In some systems, a lenticular or curved shape of flexing material is used so that once the flexing hinge straightens out, it locks into place with a curved shape that is significantly stronger in cross section than its bent, stowed shape.
Since the hinge is only flexing, there is no inherent friction to retard its deployment and, when such a folded hinge is released, the unfolding deployment action is very fast, almost violent.
Uncontrolled deployment of purely elastic systems results in extremely fast speeds at the end of deployment at latch-up that result in either excessive momentum loads being transferred into the structure, or an overload of the hinge as the momentum of the deployed article carries through to the latched hinge.
Existing solutions are either at the system level, providing mechanical restraint through a lanyard, or are at the material level, replacing the steel or composite hinge material with shape memory alloy or shape memory reinforced polymer. Both of these potential solutions have significant shortcomings that add to the overall weight and cost.
Mechanical restraint systems typically rely on a lanyard or linkage that connect the structure being deployed to an energy absorbing device such as an eddy current damper or visco-elastic damper. Devices such as these add to the mass and complexity of the overall system as well as complicating the kinematics of the deployment through the introduction of additional elements that must be managed and controlled.
Active materials such as shape memory alloys, shape memory plastics, and shape memory composites require the use of a heat source to raise their temperature above the phase change temperature. Once above the phase change temperature, the strain embedded in the material is released, causing actuation of the overall structure. However, the addition of the electrical components also adds to the cost and weight of the overall system and adds power, command and control requirements that previously did not exist. Additionally, active materials must make stiffness and density sacrifices in order to provide for the active material properties. The resulting mass and complexity additions reduce the advantages provided by the rate control inherent in the use of active materials.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a strain energy deployment hinge that is inherently passively damped so that its deployment rate is predictable and controlled.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a lightweight hinge that is of a single piece design.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a flexible hinge that has no residual strain upon deployment that would otherwise adversely affect the deployed precision.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a flexible hinge which eliminates the need for deployment control mechanisms and mechanical restraining devices.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a flexible hinge which is simple to manufacture and use.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a flexible hinge which can be used in connection with foldable booms, trusses, longeron members, collapsible truss structures, and other similar structures made of such members.
The invention results from the realization that by adding a damping material between the plies of the hinge material, the deployment of the hinge is more predictable and controlled.
The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
This invention features a flexible hinge comprising a first set of plies, a second set of plies, a hinge area where the first set of plies bend and the second set of plies bend, and a damping material disposed between plies of the first set and the second set at least at the hinge area thereof to control the deployment of the hinge.
In one embodiment, the first and second set of plies may be made of composite material. The first and second set of plies may be curved inwardly towards each other. The first and second set of plies may be curved away from each other. The first and second set of plies may be curved in the same direction. At least one of the first and second set of plies may be flat. The first and second set of plies may be attached together at portions thereof on opposite sides of the hinge area. The first and second set of plies may be formed in a member including opposing elongated slots therethrough. The slots may be diametrically opposed. There may be opposing elongated sets of slots. The damping material may be solid, and may be a rubberized elastomer. The damping material may be a liquid when applied. The damping material may be viscous or visco-elastic. The damping material may be an epoxy.
This invention further features a flexible hinge including a plurality of sets of plies, a hinge area where each of the plurality of sets of plies bend, and a damping material disposed between plies of the plurality of sets at least at the hinge area thereof to damp the rate of deployment of the hinge.
In one embodiment, the plurality of sets of plies may be made of composite material. The plurality of sets of plies may be attached together at portions thereof on opposite sides of the hinge area. The plurality of sets of plies may be formed in a member including opposing elongated slots therethrough. The slots may be diametrically opposed. There may be opposing elongated sets of slots. The damping material may be solid, and may be a rubberized elastomer. The damping material may be a liquid when applied. The damping material may be viscous. The damping material may be visco-elastic. The damping material may be an epoxy.
This invention further features a flexible hinge including a plurality of plies, a hinge area where the plurality of plies bend, and a damping material disposed between at least one pair of adjacent plies at least at the hinge area thereof to damp the rate of deployment of the hinge.
In one embodiment, the plurality of sets of plies may be made of composite material. The plurality of sets of plies may be formed in a member including opposing elongated slots therethrough. The slots may be diametrically opposed. There may be opposing elongated sets of slots. The damping material may be solid, and may be a rubberized elastomer. The damping material may be a liquid when applied. The damping material may be viscous. The damping material may be visco-elastic. The damping material may be an epoxy.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
Truss structure 10,
Depending on its specific design, hinge area 16 may fold downward, hinge area 20 may fold upward, and hinge area 18 may fold in the direction out of the plane of the drawing.
When collapsed as shown in
Upon deployment in outer space, however, truss structure 10 automatically expands as shown in
As shown in
In the prior art, hinges are formed in a truss member by cutting the truss members at the desired hinge area and attaching single clam shell shaped steel spring elements 40, 42, and 44,
The spring steel elements are similar to lengths of carpenter's tape from a tape measure. When a localized buckling force is imparted to one spring element as shown at 50 and the two truss member sections are subjected to a bending force, the spring elements readily bend, collapsing the truss member as shown in
However, these and other such truss members suffer from numerous shortcomings as discussed in the Background of the Invention above, including the fact that they are not thermally stable. Also, the joints between each spring steel element and the truss member sections can shift slightly and/or a spring steel element may yield while the truss structure is in the collapsed condition. When this truss structure is deployed in space it may not return to its original shape, resulting in dimensional instability which can severely affect the performance of sensitive equipment and optical devices. Other prior art devices added significantly to the overall weight of the system, were not dimensionally stable, and/or were complex, and/or costly.
In contrast, the subject invention solves these problems in part by a foldable member with a hinge preferably constructed of the same material as the member. In one example, foldable member 60,
Member 60 is dimensional stable and extremely reliable. In addition, by tailoring the material of tube 62, the thermal expansion and/or conductivity of member 60 can be precisely tailored to meet various performance requirements. At the same time, member 60 is sufficiently strong with respect to torsion, shear, and buckling for numerous applications.
Slots 66 and 67, as shown in
As shown in
Tube 62,
When structure 10,
In another embodiment, member 120,
In one embodiment, slot 126 is diametrically opposed from slot 132 and slot 128 is diametrically opposed from slot 134 although this is not a limitation of the present invention.
Also, stress relieving member 138 (e.g., a dowel) may be attached to each bridge element 130 and 136 on the inside of the tube for relieving the stress of each bridge member and to prevent them from tearing or cracking when the tube is folded.
The foldable member shown in
By including the hinges of this invention in a longeron twenty feet in length, it may be collapsed to a three foot long package, convenient for storage. A 3-4 inch diameter tube would typically have about a 1/16th inch wall thickness while a 1½ inch diameter tube would typically have a 0.020 inch wall thickness, although many different combinations of wall thickness and diameters are possible over a wide variety of tube lengths and tube materials for specific applications.
The result is a foldable truss member, or longeron, or tube with no moving parts or joints and thus a lighter and more dimensionally stable structure. The hinge means or elements are preferably made of the same material as the tube unlike the spring steel elements of the prior art.
The members shown in
In addition, the members shown in
Foldable member 300,
As with the other embodiments, slot 314 and an opposing slot (not seen in
In the embodiment shown in
There is yet another method of forming opposing elongated slots in accordance with this invention to achieve a configuration similar to that of
One set 404 of C-section member plies 408 and 410 is assembled and ply 408 is bonded or otherwise secured to ply 410 but typically only at the ends thereof. Set 406 of C-section member plies 412 and 414 is likewise assembled. Then, as shown in
This construction results in opposing elongated slots such as slot 420 (and a slot, not shown, opposite slot 420) separated by longitudinally running strips of material, i.e., the material of ply set 404 and 406 which fold when subjected to localized buckling forces (See
In
As with the designs discussed above with reference to
For example, as shown in
The design of
In accordance with the designs and method of
The curvature of the cross section of each member relative to its thickness is governed by the tensile and compression yield strength of the material. The maximum amount of stress is seen by the material at the surface of the cross section. For this reason, the surface of the cross section should be as free from defects as possible.
The amount of strain seen is given as:
where t is the thickness of the cross-section and R and the radius of curvature either of the curved cross-section that is to be flattened or of the cross-section to which a flat element is to be curved.
For completely elastic storage, the value of the strain may be selected to be below the yield strength of the material in the direction of the curvature.
In the case of shape memory or super-elastic materials, the strain value is selected so that the value
is below the limit of elongation and compression recovery of those materials.
For precision applications, these values of t and R should be selected so the strain
is sufficiently below the yield strain so that creep, stress relaxation and micro-yield are reduced to acceptable limits. The acceptable limits are defined by the material section and the specific needs of the application.
In
In
In
One flexible hinge in accordance with the subject invention includes a first set of plies 604 and a second set of plies 606 as shown in
The damping material 609, 611 may be solid such as a sheet of rubberized elastomer. In alternative embodiments, damping material 609 and 611 may be a liquid when applied. Typically, the damping material used is viscous and/or visco-elastic. Various releasable epoxy may be used for damping material 609 and 611. Further, adhesive layers may be disposed between the damping material and the adjacent plies.
As shown in
In one embodiment, it is possible to form ply sets 650 and 652 by forming a composite tube member made of multiple plies of composite material and damping material and forming elongated slots therethrough partially along the length thereof, especially at hinge area H. In
The damping material disposed between the individual plies at hinge area H results in a lighter and more dimensionally stable passively damped strain energy hinge. The viscous layers are typically inserted between the structural layers of the flexing hinge material of ply sets 650 and 652. The relative motion of the structural layers during folding shear the layers of visco-elastic material and over time the viscous material flows and reaches an equilibrium state. Once equilibrated, the viscous material resists the elastic motion back to the original structurally deployed state. When the restraints are released, the visco-elastic flow controls the rate of deployment by resisting the force of the strain energy hinge elements and then viscously flowing into position. The visco-elastic material provides the rate control for the deployment from the folded position shown in
Although the first and second ply sets of
Further, although the embodiments shown in
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of patent application Ser. No. 10/188,721 filed Jul. 2, 2002 entitled “Foldable Member” which is a continuation-in-part application of patent application Ser. No. 10/044,434 filed Jan. 11, 2002 now abandoned entitled “Foldable Member”, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/436,514 filed Nov. 9, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,565 entitled “Foldable Member” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,565. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,321,503.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
187078 | Adams | Feb 1877 | A |
280186 | Johnston | Jun 1883 | A |
940399 | Mueser | Nov 1909 | A |
1026801 | Haase | May 1912 | A |
1135809 | Jones | Apr 1915 | A |
1377101 | Sparling | May 1921 | A |
1486414 | Brier | Mar 1924 | A |
1769967 | Saurman et al. | Jul 1930 | A |
1925617 | Warren | Sep 1933 | A |
1971500 | Palmer | Aug 1934 | A |
1981938 | Anderson | Nov 1934 | A |
2071270 | Dellinger | Feb 1937 | A |
2210833 | Clough | Aug 1940 | A |
2266214 | Kellems | Dec 1941 | A |
2461916 | Omar | Feb 1949 | A |
2474431 | Lipman et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2491693 | Sivertsen | Dec 1949 | A |
2559951 | Dunbar et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
2695795 | Tamminga | Nov 1954 | A |
2836447 | Wright | May 1958 | A |
2905282 | Miller | Sep 1959 | A |
2960924 | Grott | Nov 1960 | A |
2986417 | Baker | May 1961 | A |
2989324 | O'Halloran | Jun 1961 | A |
3035708 | Freeman | May 1962 | A |
3166319 | Brilhart | Jan 1965 | A |
3277555 | Kutash | Oct 1966 | A |
3326497 | Michelson | Jun 1967 | A |
3353599 | Swift | Nov 1967 | A |
3357457 | Myer | Dec 1967 | A |
3367604 | Matteo | Feb 1968 | A |
3371647 | Shopbell | Mar 1968 | A |
3380097 | Pharris | Apr 1968 | A |
3381986 | Seelig | May 1968 | A |
3386128 | Vyvyan | Jun 1968 | A |
3459391 | Haynos | Aug 1969 | A |
3460992 | Avilov et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3473758 | Webb | Oct 1969 | A |
3474488 | Kruzich | Oct 1969 | A |
3477662 | Anderson | Nov 1969 | A |
3503164 | Berry et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3612287 | Maltese | Oct 1971 | A |
3652935 | Shaw | Mar 1972 | A |
3670358 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3677508 | Dillard et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3690080 | Dillard | Sep 1972 | A |
3691705 | Luckey | Sep 1972 | A |
3707304 | Gostling | Dec 1972 | A |
3730509 | Jorn | May 1973 | A |
3733758 | Maier et al. | May 1973 | A |
3749133 | Bochory | Jul 1973 | A |
3751748 | Roe et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3757476 | Schoen | Sep 1973 | A |
3776549 | Ganis | Dec 1973 | A |
3807029 | Troeger | Apr 1974 | A |
3818948 | Hedges | Jun 1974 | A |
3823747 | Dembiak et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3836979 | Kurland et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3873077 | Jorn | Mar 1975 | A |
3875711 | Palmer | Apr 1975 | A |
RE28672 | Wakeman | Jan 1976 | E |
4030102 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4032125 | Minakawa et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4032248 | Parduhn et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4068238 | Acker | Jan 1978 | A |
4078867 | Ronden | Mar 1978 | A |
4131701 | VanAuken | Dec 1978 | A |
4137686 | Kern | Feb 1979 | A |
4145765 | Malone | Mar 1979 | A |
4148163 | Chenin et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4162566 | Webb | Jul 1979 | A |
4163303 | Hanna | Aug 1979 | A |
4214932 | VanAuken | Jul 1980 | A |
4243075 | McPherson et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4250679 | Burg | Feb 1981 | A |
4259821 | Bush | Apr 1981 | A |
4266578 | Swain et al. | May 1981 | A |
4289553 | Nolf | Sep 1981 | A |
4334391 | Hedgepeth et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4365908 | Thiboutot | Dec 1982 | A |
4384163 | Rauschenbach et al. | May 1983 | A |
4417427 | Bschorr | Nov 1983 | A |
4446662 | Humphries | May 1984 | A |
4453353 | Killop et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4480415 | Truss | Nov 1984 | A |
4488282 | Chung | Dec 1984 | A |
4498938 | Moisson et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4532742 | Miura | Aug 1985 | A |
4543998 | Thomerson | Oct 1985 | A |
4558911 | Ruoff | Dec 1985 | A |
4574553 | Lisec | Mar 1986 | A |
4579302 | Schneider et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4587777 | Vasques et al. | May 1986 | A |
4599012 | Kugler et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603521 | Engelhart | Aug 1986 | A |
4603737 | Spikes | Aug 1986 | A |
4611946 | Gebelius | Sep 1986 | A |
4613870 | Stonier | Sep 1986 | A |
4614502 | Nelson | Sep 1986 | A |
4615543 | Cannon | Oct 1986 | A |
4655022 | Natori | Apr 1987 | A |
4662130 | Miura et al. | May 1987 | A |
4666107 | Berry | May 1987 | A |
4683610 | Richards et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4686134 | Ono | Aug 1987 | A |
4723579 | Hyodo et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729807 | Hede et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4778184 | Fleischer | Oct 1988 | A |
4798492 | Smith | Jan 1989 | A |
4848954 | Wiseman | Jul 1989 | A |
4867205 | Bournazel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4887397 | Peterson | Dec 1989 | A |
4955742 | Marks | Sep 1990 | A |
4958474 | Adams | Sep 1990 | A |
4960137 | Pott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4983242 | Reed | Jan 1991 | A |
5016374 | Engström | May 1991 | A |
5085018 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5094046 | Preiswerk | Mar 1992 | A |
5138806 | Marx et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163262 | Adams | Nov 1992 | A |
5167160 | Hall, II | Dec 1992 | A |
5213879 | Niwa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5228644 | Garriott et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235788 | Maimets | Aug 1993 | A |
5315795 | Chae et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319905 | Szirtes | Jun 1994 | A |
5328732 | Renna | Jul 1994 | A |
5355555 | Zarelius | Oct 1994 | A |
5366012 | Lohbeck | Nov 1994 | A |
5380131 | Crawford | Jan 1995 | A |
5381782 | DelaRama et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390463 | Sollner | Feb 1995 | A |
5402830 | Dortzbach | Apr 1995 | A |
5431508 | Kitamura | Jul 1995 | A |
5439311 | Hughes, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5494378 | Hanson | Feb 1996 | A |
5499661 | Odru et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520476 | Marks et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520747 | Marks | May 1996 | A |
5538769 | Sandman, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5556677 | Quigley et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5598598 | Sorenson | Feb 1997 | A |
5615968 | Verenski et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5664380 | Hsueh | Sep 1997 | A |
5680145 | Thomson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5720452 | Mutschler, Jr. | Feb 1998 | A |
5785280 | Baghdasarian | Jul 1998 | A |
5804277 | Ashbee | Sep 1998 | A |
5833176 | Rubin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857648 | Dailey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874133 | Cochran | Feb 1999 | A |
5895013 | Towfiq | Apr 1999 | A |
5921048 | Francom et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924745 | Campbell | Jul 1999 | A |
5977932 | Robinson | Nov 1999 | A |
5984568 | Lohbeck | Nov 1999 | A |
6004639 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012522 | Donnelly et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013890 | Hulsizer | Jan 2000 | A |
6016848 | Egres, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028570 | Gilger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065500 | Metcalfe | May 2000 | A |
6102339 | Wu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104358 | Parker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132882 | Landin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135030 | Besaw | Oct 2000 | A |
6168116 | Renshall et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175989 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178702 | Hand et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188168 | Han et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217975 | Daton-Lovett | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273634 | Lohbeck | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302277 | Resh | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321503 | Warren | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334235 | Duperray et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343442 | Marks | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6343511 | Lynnworth et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345482 | Warren | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374565 | Warren | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375385 | Kennedy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6453635 | Turner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475580 | Wright | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6547814 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560942 | Warren et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
20010010012 | Edwin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020056248 | Warren | May 2002 | A1 |
20030019180 | Warren et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030182878 | Warren | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030182879 | Warren | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61-43579 | Sep 1986 | JP |
2002-161650 | Jun 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050022465 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09436514 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 10044434 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10188721 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10891907 | US | |
Parent | 10044434 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 10188721 | US |