My invention relates to a flexible dry fire protection sprinkler. In particular, my invention relates to a flexible dry fire protection sprinkler for use in an area that is exposed to freezing conditions. In addition, my invention relates to a flexible dry fire protection sprinkler that may be adjusted during installation to avoid obstructions.
Dry sprinklers are used in areas that are exposed to freezing conditions, such as in freezers or outdoor walkways. In some dry-pipe systems, fluid supply conduits are positioned in a space in which the fluid in the supply conduit is not subject to freezing. A dry sprinkler is attached to the fluid supply conduit and extends into a space in which the fluid would otherwise be subject to freezing.
A typical dry sprinkler comprises a sprinkler head, a tube, a pipe connector at an inlet end of the tube that connects the inlet end to supply conduits, or a pipe network, of the fire suppression system, a plug seal at the inlet end to prevent water from entering the tube until it is necessary to actuate the dry sprinkler, and an actuating mechanism to maintain the plug seal at the inlet end until actuation of the dry sprinkler. Typically, the sprinkler head is attached to an end of the tube that is opposite to the inlet end of the tube. Also, the tube is conventionally vented to the atmosphere to allow drainage of any condensate that may form in the tube.
Examples of dry sprinklers are generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,431, to Ondracek, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,240, also to Ondracek. As shown generally in these patents, the actuating mechanism of a dry sprinkler can be a rod or other similar structure that extends through the tube between the sprinkler head and the inlet end to maintain the plug seal at the inlet end. The actuating mechanism includes a thermally responsive support element at the sprinkler head that supports the rod and, therefore, the plug seal at the inlet end. In some dry sprinklers, the tube is also sealed at the sprinkler head end of the tube and the actuating mechanism is supported at the sprinkler head end by a seal cap that is supported by the thermally responsive support element. In such arrangements, the space in the tube between the seal cap and the plug seal can be filled with a pressurized gas, such as dry air or nitrogen, or with a liquid, such as an antifreeze solution. When an elevated temperature occurs, the thermally responsive support element fails, releasing the plug seal (and also any lower seal at the sprinkler head end of the tube) to allow water from the fluid supply conduit to flow into and through the tube to the sprinkler head, whereupon the fluid is distributed by the sprinkler head.
Conventional dry sprinklers are fabricated using a rigid tube having a seal at the inlet that is separated from the thermally responsive support element of the sprinkler that is intended to be positioned in an area exposed to freezing conditions, such as an area that is not heated. The rigid tube extends into the unheated area from a wet pipe system (located in a heated area) and must be precisely aligned and installed while avoiding various architectural, structural and mechanical obstructions typically found in commercial or industrial buildings.
To remedy the problems and difficulties noted above, a dry sprinkler is provided that has a flexible tube. The dry sprinkler includes an inlet having an inlet orifice sealed by an inlet seal assembly, an outlet, and a release mechanism for selectively releasing the inlet seal assembly. A first end of the flexible tube is attached to the inlet. The dry sprinkler also includes a flexible linkage extending longitudinally within the flexible tube, between the inlet and outlet, the flexible linkage constructed to operate the release mechanism in response to axial translation of the flexible linkage. The outlet is attached to the flexible tube, and includes a fire sprinkler portion having a thermally responsive element constructed to support an outlet seal assembly in an unresponsive state. In a case in which the thermally responsive element is in a responsive state, the outlet seal assembly is released, and the flexible linkage translates in an outlet direction at least an inlet stroke distance to activate the release mechanism to release the inlet seal assembly.
My invention relates to a flexible dry fire protection sprinkler (dry sprinkler). One embodiment of such a dry sprinkler 100 is shown in
The following description relates to an embodiment with reference to the appended drawings and refers to directions including “inlet” and “outlet”. As used herein, the phrase “inlet direction” refers to a generally axial direction that is from the outlet 2 and toward the inlet 1 of the dry sprinkler 100, while the phrase “outlet direction” refers to a generally axial direction that is from the inlet 1 toward the outlet 2 of the dry sprinkler 100.
In one embodiment, the flexible tube 3 is formed as a corrugated metal hose constructed similarly to that of a conventional corrugated natural gas appliance hose. The flexible tube 3 has a nominal hose diameter between 0.8 inch and one inch. The flexible tube 3 can be bent into two opposing sections 90, i.e., folded in a shallow Z-shape or a shallow S-shape.
As shown in greater detail in
The internal surface of the fitting 30 has a stepped cross-sectional profile. Beginning at an inlet end, the fitting 30 has a frustoconical surface 21 that tapers radially inward toward an inlet orifice 12. In one embodiment, the angle of the frustoconical surface 21 with respect to the axis Y-Y is about forty degrees. Adjacent to the frustoconical surface 21 in the outlet direction is a first cylindrical surface 22 that surrounds the inlet orifice 12. Adjacent to the first cylindrical surface 22 is a second cylindrical surface 23 and a cap assembly sealing flange 15. The second cylindrical surface 23 has a diameter that is at least as large as the diameter of an annular spring washer 17, described below, when the spring washer 17 is in a compressed state. The second cylindrical surface 23 extends to a yoke connection section 27 that has internal threads for mating with external threads of a threaded yoke support ring 8b. The internal threads of the yoke connection section 27 extend about 0.3 inch axially and the nominal diameter of the threads is one inch.
Adjacent to the yoke connection section 27 in the outlet direction is a first biasing portion connection section 28 that has a diameter that is larger than that of the yoke connection section 27. The first biasing portion connection section 28 extends axially about 0.5 inch to the outlet end of the inlet connection portion 9. The first biasing portion connection section 28 has internal threads for mating with external threads of the first biasing portion 4 of the inlet 1.
As shown in
With reference to
In the inactive state of the dry sprinkler 100, the inlet sealing cap 16 supports the annular spring washer 17 against the fitting 30. The inlet sealing cap assembly 13 is supported in a sealed position by the glass bulb 11 that is interposed between the inlet sealing cap assembly 13 and a multi-legged yoke 8a that is supported by the fitting 30 via the yoke support ring 8b threadably connected to the fitting 30.
The glass bulb 11 can be empty or filled with a thermally responsive fluid, and, in one embodiment, the glass bulb 11 has a nominal length of twenty mm. The glass bulb 11 is oriented substantially longitudinally and coaxially with the fitting 30 and the inlet biasing portion 4. The glass bulb 11 has an outlet pipe end 11a that is seated in a seat 14 formed in the multi-legged yoke 8a. At an inlet end, the glass bulb 11 has a rounded end 11b, also referred to as the “pivot point”. The inlet sealing cap assembly 13 has a conical groove 35 formed in the center of the inlet sealing cap 16 in which the pivot point 11b of the glass bulb 11 is seated.
When the dry sprinkler 100 is in the inactive state, the annular spring washer 17 is compressed against the cap assembly sealing flange 15 by threading the yoke support ring 8b into the fitting 30, thereby sealing the flow path of fluid through the inlet orifice 12. The annular spring washer 17 is compressed by the glass bulb 11 to a sufficient deflection capable of surviving a hydrostatic test pressure between six hundred pounds per square inch and seven hundred pounds per square inch. Thus, it is possible to assemble the fitting 30, the inlet sealing cap assembly 13, the multi-legged yoke 8a, the yoke support ring 8b, and the glass bulb 11 together as a modular assembly comprising the inlet connection portion 9 of the inlet 1.
The multi-legged yoke 8a is supported by yoke support ring 8b that is threaded into and retained by an inner wall of the fitting 30.
At an inlet end, the multi-legged yoke 8a has an angled edge 32 that is angled with respect to the axis Y-Y and a horizontal axis X-X. In one embodiment, the angled edge 32 is angled by about forty degrees with respect to the horizontal axis X-X. The seat 14 for the glass bulb 11 is coaxial with the multi-legged yoke 8a, and is intersected by the angled edge 32. The diameter of the multi-legged yoke 8a is about 0.934 inch and the diameter of the seat 14 is about 0.156 inch. The overall axial dimension of the multi-legged yoke 8a is about one inch.
Referring again to
As shown in
The first spacer 40 has an outer annular flange 40a and an inner annular flange 40b that are axially spaced from each other by a frustoconical web 40c. The inlet compression spring 39 is retained between an annular flange 41a proximate the outlet end of the first threaded tube 41 and the outer annular flange 40a of the first spacer 40. The first spacer 40 is biased axially by the inlet compression spring 39 towards the yoke support ring 8b. The frustoconical web 40c has openings to permit fluid to pass therethrough. The inner annular flange 40b includes an opening though which the collar rod 37 passes.
The optimum spring force is established when the first threaded tube 41 is fully threaded into the fitting 30 to set a desired distance between the inner annular flange 40b of the first spacer 40 and the stop 38 of the collar rod 37. The desired distance “Z” set is termed the “inlet stroke”, and, in one embodiment, is set to be greater than the axial deflection of the end of the flexible linkage 10 when the flexible tube 3 and the flexible linkage 10 are bent into two opposing ninety degrees, i.e., folded in a shallow Z-shape or a shallow S-shape. In one embodiment, the inlet stroke Z is approximately 0.60 inch.
The flexible linkage 10 can be formed of wire or cable, such as braided stainless steel cable. In the preferred embodiment, the flexible linkage 10 is formed of a 0.125 inch diameter braided stainless steel cable. Collars 10a (
Referring again to
As shown in greater detail in
In one embodiment, the outlet compression spring 44 is retained between an annular retaining ring 47 and the outer annular flange 45a of the second spacer 45. The retaining ring 47 is retained in a notch 48 formed in an inner wall of the second threaded tube 43. In another embodiment, the outlet compression spring 44 is retained by an annular flange similar to the annular flange 41a of first threaded tube 41, shown in
The sprinkler portion 42 of the outlet 2 is a conventional fire sprinkler and includes a threaded sprinkler body 50 constructed to mate with threads of the outlet of the second threaded tube 43 of the outlet biasing portion 5, a frame 51 extending from the sprinkler body 50 in the output direction, and a deflector 52 supported by a hub 51 of the frame 51. The deflector 52 distributes fluid that passes through the orifice venturi 46 and through the outlet 2. The sprinkler body 50 retains an orifice plug 53 that communicates with an outlet orifice 54 in an outlet end of the orifice venturi 46. The orifice plug 53 is retained in a seated position in an annular flange 50a of the sprinkler body 50, as shown in
When the dry sprinkler 100 is assembled, the orifice venturi 46 exerts a biasing force against the orifice plug 53. A distance “ZZ” between the outer flange 46a of the orifice venturi 46 and the inlet end of the body 50 of the sprinkler portion 42 is termed the “outlet stroke” ZZ, and is set by threading the body 50 with the second threaded tube 43 of the outlet biasing portion 5. In one embodiment, the outlet stroke ZZ is set to be about 0.80 inch and the inlet stroke Z is set, as discussed above, to be about 0.60 inch.
The second threaded tube 43 has external threads at an inlet end for mating with internal threads of the flexible tube 3. The second threaded tube 43 also has internal threads for mating with the external threads of the sprinkler portion 42. The outlet 2 can be pre-assembled and attached as one modular unit to the outlet end 7 of the flexible tube 3.
When the flexible tube 3 bends, the flexible linkage 10 within the flexible tube 3 will deflect. Due to internal diametrical and radial clearances of the flexible tube 3, however, when the flexible tube 3 is bent from a straight configuration, for example, in which the inlet stroke Z and outlet stroke ZZ distance are set, and in which the inlet 1, the outlet 2, and the flexible tube 3 are substantially in axial alignment, the ends of the flexible linkage 10 within the flexible tube 3 will change positions relative to the ends of the flexible tube 3. For example, the ends of the flexible linkage 10 will move longitudinally inward from the ends of the flexible tube 3 as the angular deflection of the flexible tube 3 increases. For example, if a flexible tube 3 having a length of twenty inches and a flexible linkage 10 having approximately the same length are bent into two opposing ninety degrees, i.e., folded into a shallow Z-shape or a shallow S-shape, the length of the flexible linkage 10 and the flexible tube 3 remain the same, but the ends of the flexible linkage 10 shift further inwardly by approximately 0.5 inch relative to the ends of the flexible tube 3. By virtue of the foregoing arrangement of the dry sprinkler 100, each of the inlet compression spring 39 and the outlet compression spring 44 will tolerate changes in the relative movement between the flexible linkage 10 and the flexible tube 3 without affecting the tautness of the flexible linkage 10 due to field induced bending of the flexible tube 3. Accordingly, the inlet stroke Z is set to be sufficiently large to avoid fracture of the glass bulb 11 due to bending of the flexible tube 3.
The outlet compression spring 44 is constructed to be at least 1.5 times stronger than the opposing inlet compression spring 39 so that, as the flexible tube 3 is bent at a larger angle, the deflection of the ends of the flexible linkage 10 is compensated for by the inlet compression spring 39 and not by the outlet compression spring 44.
In operation, in the event of a fire condition, heat from the fire will cause the thermally responsive element 56 (i.e., the glass bulb 56) of the sprinkler portion 42 to break. In the case in which the thermally responsive element 56 is a glass bulb filled with a thermally responsive fluid, as shown in
As the second spacer 45 moves to the second position, it pulls on the crimp 10b that, in turn, pulls on the first spacer 40. The first spacer 40 then compresses the inlet compression spring 39, and as the first spacer 40 continues to translate axially in the output direction, the first spacer 40 pulls on the collar rod 37. When the collar rod 37 is pulled by the first spacer 40, the collar rod 37 pulls on the collar 36 in a direction down and along the angled edge 32 of the multi-legged yoke 8a and causes the collar 36 to snap into the glass bulb 11, thereby breaking the glass bulb 11.
When the glass bulb 11 breaks, axial support for the inlet sealing cap assembly 13 is removed. Water pressure on the inlet side of the inlet sealing cap assembly 13 unseats the inlet sealing cap assembly 13 and initiates fluid flow through the inlet orifice 12. In one embodiment, the collar rod 37 is constructed to engage the first spacer 40 when the first spacer 40 is displaced axially the inlet stroke distance Z of 0.60 inch and the second spacer 45 is displaced axially the outlet stroke distance ZZ of 0.80 inch. The 0.20 inch difference between the inlet stroke distance Z and the outlet stroke distance ZZ represents a safety margin over the 0.60 inch shift that the taut flexible linkage 10 would experience merely by being bent during field installation. As a result of this arrangement, the glass bulb 11 seated in the multi-legged yoke 8a will not break, and the inlet seal cap assembly 13 will not be unseated, unless the second spacer 45 is displaced the outlet stroke distance ZZ that is greater than the inlet stroke distance Z. Thus, inadvertent activation of the dry sprinkler 100 due to substantially large flexing of the flexible tube 3 can be avoided.
When the sprinkler 100 is activated, the inlet seal cap assembly 13 moves axially in the output direction, pivots on the pivot point 11b, slides down the angled edge 32 of the multi-legged yoke 8a, and is retained by the flutes 31 of the multi-legged yoke 8a. Fluid from the sprinkler system flows through the inlet orifice 12, around the retained inlet seal cap assembly 13, through the interior of the flexible tube 3, and out the outlet orifice 54 of the outlet 2 to the deflector 52 that distributes the fluid from the dry sprinkler 100.
While a dry sprinkler incorporating various combinations of the foregoing features provides the desired fast operation with full rated flow under at least some operating conditions, adopting the above-described features in combination results in a dry sprinkler that provides the desired fast operation with full rated flow under a very wide range of rated flows (commonly expressed in the art in terms of the K-factor) and across a variety of fluid pressures in the fluid supply conduit, i.e., from 7 psi to 175 psi.
The invention also relates to a fire protection system utilizing one or more such dry sprinklers. The fire protection system includes a fluid supply in communication with at least one dry sprinkler. At least one of the dry sprinklers of the fire protection system is constructed as a flexible dry sprinkler in accordance with the foregoing description.
The attached drawings should be understood as being not to scale. Those drawings illustrate portions of embodiments of a dry sprinkler according to the present invention, and form part of the present application.
By virtue of the flexibility in the flexible tube 3 of the dry sprinkler 100, installation of the sprinkler system, and, in particular, of the dry sprinkler 100, is facilitated because the dry sprinkler 100 can be moved around building obstructions that would ordinarily require additional rigid plumbing. Moreover, by virtue of the flexibility of the flexible tube 3, installers of the fluid supply can more easily accommodate variability or errors in the location of sprinkler drops in the ceiling of structures, since the flexible tube 3 can be bent to move the sprinkler portion 42 of the dry sprinkler 100 to a desired position.
While the present invention has been described with respect to what are, at present, considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
My invention can be used to provide fire protection, particularly in areas subject to freezing conditions. Thus, the invention is applicable to the fire protection industry.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/149,178, filed Jan. 14, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,596,822, issued Mar. 7, 2023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/515,600, filed Jul. 18, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,933,267, issued Mar. 2, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/044,837, filed Jul. 25, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,493,307, issued Dec. 3, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/534,881, filed Nov. 6, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,265,560, issued Apr. 23, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/486,904, filed Jun. 1, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,887,822, issued Nov. 18, 2014, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3007528 | Gloeckler | Jul 1959 | A |
3135331 | Lee | Jun 1964 | A |
3857277 | Moore | Dec 1974 | A |
4177862 | Bray | Dec 1979 | A |
4217961 | Wotton | Aug 1980 | A |
4570719 | Wilk | Feb 1986 | A |
4854388 | Wyatt | Aug 1989 | A |
4930579 | George | Jun 1990 | A |
4964470 | Gaulin | Oct 1990 | A |
4991655 | McHugh | Feb 1991 | A |
5154232 | McHugh | Oct 1992 | A |
5297635 | McHugh | Mar 1994 | A |
5327976 | Hattori | Jul 1994 | A |
5390744 | McHugh | Feb 1995 | A |
5415239 | Kotter et al. | May 1995 | A |
5570745 | MacDonald, III | Nov 1996 | A |
5743337 | MacDonald, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5775431 | Ondracek | Jul 1998 | A |
5842526 | Archer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5967240 | Ondracek | Oct 1999 | A |
6119784 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123154 | MacDonald, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6158519 | Kretschmer | Dec 2000 | A |
6164324 | Gradle | Dec 2000 | A |
6336509 | Polan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6488097 | MacDonald, III et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491109 | Christenson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6526907 | Donehue | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6752218 | MacDonald, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6851482 | Dolan | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860331 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871660 | Hampsch | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6907938 | MacDonald, III et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6960638 | Quis et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7032680 | MacDonald, III et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7143834 | Dolan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7213319 | Silva, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7293576 | Royse | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296634 | MacDonald, III et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7373720 | Jensen et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7516800 | Silva, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7559376 | Silva, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7699117 | Johnston et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7766252 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7841418 | Pahila et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845599 | Jackson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7921928 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8191647 | Cordell et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212615 | Silcox et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8336920 | Stempo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8607888 | Nusbaum | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8740158 | Silcox | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8887822 | Polan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9159598 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9339673 | Shipman | May 2016 | B2 |
9358411 | Shipman | Jun 2016 | B2 |
10143872 | Shipman | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10265560 | Polan | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10391343 | Polan | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10493307 | Polan | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20020003042 | Reilly | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030075343 | Ballard | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050090604 | Quis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121206 | Dolan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050284644 | MacDonald, III et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060113094 | Silva, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070039743 | MacDonald, III et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070095548 | MacDonald III et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169946 | Cordell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070272319 | Bittenbender et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080196906 | Nusbaum | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080277124 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100038099 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120031630 | Stephens | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120132444 | Buzdum et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120298382 | Shipman | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298383 | Shipman | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20160228734 | Shipman | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160250507 | Shipman | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160271432 | Shipman | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20180326238 | Polan | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2837316 | Dec 2012 | CA |
101291706 | Oct 2008 | CN |
201356932 | Dec 2009 | CN |
103826754 | May 2014 | CN |
3919638 | Nov 1990 | DE |
19914022 | Sep 2000 | DE |
102007062668 | Jun 2009 | DE |
2123689 | Feb 1984 | GB |
05-137810 | Jun 1993 | JP |
06-170008 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2005027769 | Feb 2005 | JP |
3852056 | Nov 2006 | JP |
4872054 | Dec 2011 | JP |
200217901 | Feb 2000 | KR |
200191235 | May 2000 | KR |
200285117 | Aug 2002 | KR |
200384965 | May 2005 | KR |
20070059890 | Jun 2007 | KR |
101114864 | Mar 2012 | KR |
101128257 | Mar 2012 | KR |
101130578 | Apr 2012 | KR |
0154772 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2012166636 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 2, 2014, issued in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/043298. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated Jan. 16, 2015, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. 12797211.3. |
Communication including extended European search report dated Jan. 18, 2016, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. 12797211.3. |
Canadian Official Action dated Feb. 1, 2016, issued in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,122. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jun. 28, 2016, issued in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267363. |
Australian Notice of Acceptance dated Jul. 5, 2016, issued in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267363. |
Chinese Official Action dated Jul. 11, 2016, issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380037288.3, with an English translation. |
Canadian Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2017, issued in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,122. |
Chinese Notification of Intent to Grant dated Feb. 4, 2017, issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380037288.3. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2017, issued in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,122. |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Nov. 28, 2017, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. 12797211.3. |
Mexican Official Action dated Jun. 6, 2017, issued in corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/014591. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Jun. 15, 2017, issued in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267363. |
United Arab Emirates Search Report, provided by the Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jul. 18, 2017, issued in corresponding United Arab Emirates Patent Application No. UAE/P/1321/2014. |
Mexican Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2017, issued in corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/014591. |
Snijder, A.H. et al., “The glass swing: a vector active structure made of glass struts and 3D-printed steel nodes,” Glass Struct. Eng. (2020) vol. 5, pp. 99 to 116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00110-9 (18 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230181953 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17149178 | Jan 2021 | US |
Child | 18166042 | US | |
Parent | 16515600 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 17149178 | US | |
Parent | 16044837 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16515600 | US | |
Parent | 14534881 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 16044837 | US | |
Parent | 13486904 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14534881 | US |