The following disclosure relates to insulating windows and glazing products. More particularly, it relates to vacuum insulating glazing units with multiple transparent panes having an evacuated space therebetween.
Using vacuum to increase the insulating performance of window glazing components is not a new concept, and in fact many innovative approaches have been taught in the literature over the last 75 years. It is, however, readily observed by skilled practitioners of the art that the majority of the prior work relates to low- to medium-vacuum levels, i.e., vacuum levels within the range from about 760 torr to about 10−3 torr. Note, for purposes of this application, a “higher” level of vacuum is understood to correspond to a lower absolute pressure, e.g., a vacuum level of 10−4 torr is a higher vacuum than 10−3 torr. In a few cases the literature makes reference to the measured vacuum levels in glazing components, but in many cases the maintainable vacuum level must be interpreted from careful evaluation of the materials exposed to the vacuum enclosure, the methods used to create the vacuum seal and the methods used to produce the vacuum condition in the enclosed space.
While the literature describing vacuum insulating window glazing components may not rigorously define the vacuum levels, literature from other industries, such as the electronics industry, defines different vacuum levels and the types of materials and processing methods required to achieved and maintain those specified vacuum levels. The common distinction between medium- and high-vacuum devices is a vacuum level of 10−3 torr. In other words, the range of high-vacuum levels begins at about 10−3 torr and goes higher, i.e., in the direction toward and/or past 10−4 torr. In the case of vacuum insulating window glazing components, where it is desirable for the components to retain a prescribed minimum vacuum level for an extended operating lifetime (e.g., 25 years), a vacuum containment system capable of initially maintaining a higher level of vacuum (e.g., 10−5 torr), may be necessary. For the purposes of this application, vacuum insulating glazing units capable of maintaining vacuum levels of 10−3 torr or higher are termed high-vacuum insulating glazing units (HVIGU).
One purpose of HVIGUs is to provide lower levels (i.e., compared to units with low- or medium-vacuum levels) of conductive heat losses between temperature-controlled spaces and non-temperature-controlled spaces separated by the glazing unit. In such cases providing this desired lower level of conductive heat loss over a long period of time is desirable. Since the ambient conditions in the uncontrolled space, most commonly the external atmospheric environment, produce a variety of stresses, including thermal, pressure and mechanical vibration and since, to a lesser extent, this also happens also in the conditioned space, various embodiments of the HVIGU will be more or less capable of surviving the applied stresses while maintaining the desired minimum vacuum level. Thus, the design lifetime, i.e., the period of time that the HVIGU will maintain its level of performance, is one of the performance features of the HVIGU.
Generally speaking, HVIGUs are typically constructed using at least two spaced-apart panes of glass of some prescribed thickness. These panes are then sealed, typically along the edges, using some arrangement of sealing elements which are intended to isolate the evacuated volume from the surrounding atmospheric pressure. Since the primary objective of the HVIGU is to provide a low thermally-conductive barrier between environmental spaces, each of which may have a higher or lower temperature with respect to the other, it is obvious to skilled practitioners of the art that the two panes of glass may reach temperature levels which vary distinctly from each other. In fact, for a given space-to-space temperature differential, the pane-to-pane temperature differential will typically increase as a function of reduced thermal conductivity of the HVIGU. As a result of the temperature differential between the panes of glass, the panes may expand and contract differentially. This may introduce substantial strain at the edges of the HVIGU where the seal is attached. If the seal at the HVIGU edge is made to be rigid, pane-to-pane temperature differentials may produce significant stresses in the HVIGU, along with a number of expected deleterious effects, for example, large-scale deflections, bowing and other physical or optical changes of panes and/or shortened seal life for the HVIGU.
A need exists, therefore, for a flexible edge seal for a HVIGU or other insulated glazing unit that can accommodate the strains associated with the expanding and contracting glass panes. A need further exists, for a flexible edge seal that can withstand the mechanical forces imposed by atmospheric pressure on the seal. A need still further exists, for a flexible edge seal that can retain the prescribed vacuum levels within the evacuated space.
In one aspect, the invention comprises a flexible edge seal for a vacuum insulating glazing unit having a first glass pane and a second glass pane spaced-apart from the first. The edge seal comprises a seal member formed of a hermetically bondable material and having a first end, a second end and a center section disposed therebetween. The first end is hermetically bondable to a first glass pane. The second end is hermetically bondable to a second glass pane. The center section comprises a plurality of convolutes.
For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of flexible edge seals for vacuum insulating glazing units are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.
The invention describes a flexible edge seal which at the same time provides the required stress mitigation, atmospheric pressure resistance and vacuum containment functions, while allowing for high-volume manufacturing methods.
Referring now to
In one preferred embodiment, the single-sided flexible edge seal 100 is appropriately die-formed from a flat “picture frame,” produced by welding metal strips of appropriate lengths together. In an alternate embodiment, the flat “picture frame” is formed by cutting from a single sheet of material. Another embodiment involves shaping lineal and corner section pieces separately and then welding the corner pieces to the lineal pieces in a subsequent operation, to form the final single-sided flexible edge seal configuration.
Referring still to
In some embodiments, the lower peaks of the convolute portions 118 of the seal member 102 may touch the surface 110 of the adjacent glass pane 106, normal to the glass-to-metal bonding plane 116 when vacuum is applied. This facilitates resisting collapse of the flexible edge seal 100 under atmospheric pressure with material of minimum thickness, while at the same time allowing for flexing of the convolutes 118 to allow for inner and outer pane movements, caused by temperature differentials.
The portion of the single-sided flexible edge seal material that is bonded to the glass may be tapered in thickness, ranging in some embodiments from about 2 degrees to about 10 degrees to aid in achieving minimal stress in the glass-to-metal joint. The thinnest portion of the seal material on the smaller area glass pane is oriented toward the middle of the glass pane, increasing in thickness further towards the outside edge of the assembly. The thinnest portion of the seal material on the larger glass pane is oriented toward the outside of the glass pane, decreasing in thickness further towards the outside edge of the assembly.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The weld joint 210 or 210a may be oriented so that it is easily made capable of containing a high vacuum, using for example, but not limited to, one of the following methods: Laser welding; electron beam welding; seam welding (e.g., electrical resistance seam welding); solder joining; resistance welding; and/or TIG welding.
In one embodiment, the portion of the single-sided flexible edge seal that is to be welded may be located in a plane that is normal to the glass-to-metal joint. As such, it is configured in such a manner that risk of handling damage to the joint and to the single-sided flexible edge seal itself is minimized. In addition, this may facilitate “nesting” the two seal portions together.
The two panes of glass 104, 106 may be aligned and held in position prior to bonding or welding operations through the use of bent features on the single-sided flexible edge seal. This serves to simplify or eliminate complicated tooling which otherwise may be required to provide the same alignment and positioning functions.
Glass and/or metal surface pretreatments may be applied either before and/or after the forming of one or both metal seal portions, and may be applied before and/or after one or both metal seal portions is/are bonded to the associated glass pane(s). For example, to facilitate an excellent highly hermetic (i.e., vacuum-tight) weld, the metal seal material may be plated with one or more metals that improve or allow the weld process to occur. For example, nickel may be plated onto the base metal when electrical resistance seam welding is performed. The electrodes (of the seam welder) then melt the nickel and this nickel may become the welded material. In some cases, a very thin layer (sometimes referred to as a “strike”) of gold (e.g., having a thickness within the range from about 50 micro-inches to about 100 micro-inches) is plated onto the nickel soon after the nickel is plated onto the base material, metal or metal alloy. The gold may serve as an oxidation/corrosion barrier on the base metal until welding occurs.
In preferred embodiments, the flexible edge seal may have one or more layers of a material applied to its surface for one of the following purposes: a) to enhance or enable welding; b) to improve resistance to environmental-borne corrosives such as acids, salt water, humidity, sulfur compounds and/or galvanic activity; and/or c) to enhance or enable forming the glass-to-metal bond between the panes and the seal material.
Appropriate vacuum seal integrity testing can be performed on the shaped flexible edge seal, prior to subsequent assembly.
Glass, because it is brittle, requires careful handling during manufacturing and assembly operations. The addition of a fragile edge seal element, potentially protruding beyond the edges of the glass panes, may further complicate the handling issues. The single-sided flexible edge seal is configured so that the fabricated VIGU can be handled and stored vertically, by resting the assembly on the protruding pane of glass. This method of handling and storage is in common use today, so the implementation and changeover costs associated with the single-sided flexible edge seal may be mitigated through this feature.
The single-sided flexible edge seal corners are rounded as shown in
Referring now to
The edge cap 302 may be configured to provide cushioned support for the edge of the glass panes 104, 106 in such a manner that the stresses imposed on the edges of the protruding piece of glass are distributed, mitigating damage to the glass. Appropriate cushioning sealant material 304 may be employed including, but not limited to: silicone, urethane, polysulfide, hot-melts and others.
The edge cap may be further provided with surface seals 306 to facilitate sealing the gap between the edge cap and the glass surface. Liquids and other debris may thereby be excluded from the enclosed volume, providing further protection against the damage of the glass and single-sided flexible edge seal. Seals 306 may be formed from materials including, but are not limited to: silicone, urethane, rubber, polysulfide, hot-melts and others. In some embodiments, the edge cap assembly 302 may include “weep” holes (i.e., drainage holes) 308 on the designated lower edge or downward-facing side of the assembly.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring still to
Furthermore, the support element 402 is stabilized against atmospheric pressure and movement arising from glass expansion and contraction by its bearing against the smaller pane of glass 106. In the illustrated embodiment, it is further stabilized against atmospheric pressure and movement arising from glass expansion and contraction by its bearing on the vertical sides of a small groove 406 formed in the glass pane 106.
The hermetic, vacuum seal for the flexible edge seal 404 is provided through the use of a thin metal foil 404, which fits over the aforementioned structural support element 402 and is bonded to both panes of glass 104, 106 in bond areas 408, 410, respectively. In a preferred embodiment, the foil 404 may be bonded to the glass in a narrow band in the plane of the largest “X-Y” dimension in a prescribed fashion, around the periphery edge of each the inner and outer panes of glass. The width of the bonded areas 408, 410 may be in the range of about 0.1 inches to about 0.4 inches. The preferred embodiment for the bonded areas 408, 410 is about 0.150 inches wide. The foil 404 may be produced from materials including, but not limited to titanium, stainless steel, controlled expansion metal alloy, aluminum, copper, carbon steel, inconel, nickel. The preferred embodiment is stainless steel. The thickness of the vacuum seal foil 404 may be in the range of about 0.005 inches to about 0.015 inches. The preferred thickness is about 0.007 inches.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that these flexible edge seals for vacuum insulating glazing units provide glazing units having increased thermal barrier performance. It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application for Patent Ser. No. 61/145,095, filed on Jan. 15, 2009, and entitled FLEXIBLE EDGE SEAL FOR VACUUM INSULATING GLAZING UNIT, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This Invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-FC26-06NT42765 awarded by the Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49167 | Stetson | Aug 1865 | A |
| 988308 | Campbell | Apr 1911 | A |
| 1004257 | Higbee | Sep 1911 | A |
| 1127381 | Byrnes | Feb 1915 | A |
| 1388126 | Rohland | Aug 1921 | A |
| 1436197 | Rohland | Nov 1922 | A |
| 1560690 | Housekeeper | Nov 1925 | A |
| 2011557 | Anderegg | Aug 1935 | A |
| 2057969 | Payson | Aug 1935 | A |
| 2119009 | Elias | May 1938 | A |
| 2122453 | Clause | Jul 1938 | A |
| 2177001 | Owen | Oct 1939 | A |
| 2206558 | Bennet | Jul 1940 | A |
| 2220690 | Stupakoff | Nov 1940 | A |
| 2308918 | Hertel et al. | Jan 1943 | A |
| 2625717 | Wampler et al. | Jan 1953 | A |
| 2708774 | Seelen | May 1955 | A |
| 2730987 | Nelson | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2756467 | Etling | Jul 1956 | A |
| 3232732 | Wax | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3389522 | Hordis | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3611019 | Krembs | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3698878 | Hale et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3778127 | Langston | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3778244 | Nedelec | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3808115 | Manion | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3828960 | Walles | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3865567 | Klomp | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3901997 | Groth | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3902883 | Bayer | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3922705 | Yerman | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3940898 | Kaufman | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3971178 | Mazzoni | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3979668 | Samulowitz | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3990201 | Falbel | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4016644 | Kurtz | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4035539 | Luboshez | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4047351 | Derner | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4060660 | Carlson | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4063271 | Bean et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4089143 | Lapietra | May 1978 | A |
| 4099082 | Chodil et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4130452 | Indri | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4132218 | Bennett | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4186725 | Schwartz | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4204015 | Wardlaw et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4261086 | Giachino et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4274936 | Love | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4303732 | Torobin | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4355323 | Kock | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4357187 | Stanley | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4427123 | Komeda et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4444821 | Young | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4468423 | Hall | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4486482 | Kobayashi | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4531511 | Hochberg | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4536998 | Matteucci et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4547432 | Pitts | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4649085 | Landram | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4683154 | Benson | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4687687 | Terneu | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4737475 | Thomas | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4780164 | Ruckheim | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4798695 | Redel | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4928448 | Phillip | May 1990 | A |
| 5005557 | Bachli | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5009218 | Bachli | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5014466 | Winner | May 1991 | A |
| 5017252 | Aldrich | May 1991 | A |
| 5032439 | Glicksman | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5083058 | Nonomura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085926 | Iida | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5086729 | Katigiri | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5107649 | Benson | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5115299 | Wright | May 1992 | A |
| 5115612 | Newton et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5118924 | Mehra et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5124185 | Kerr | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5157893 | Benson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5175975 | Benson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5227206 | Bachli | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5270084 | Parker | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5302414 | Alkhimov et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5330816 | Rusek | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5370913 | Lin | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378527 | Nakanishi | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5423119 | Yang | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5433056 | Benson | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5489321 | Benson | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491953 | Lafond | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5508092 | Kimock | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5525430 | Chahroudi | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5582866 | White | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589239 | Tomono et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5610431 | Martin | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5625222 | Yoneda et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5643644 | Demars | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657607 | Collins et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5719979 | Furuyama | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5778629 | Howes | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789857 | Ymaura | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811926 | Novich | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5846638 | Meissner | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855638 | Demars | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5856914 | O'Boyle | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5891536 | Collins | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897927 | Tsai | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902652 | Collins et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5920463 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937611 | Howes | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945721 | Tatoh | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949655 | Glenn | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5950398 | Hubbard | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5982010 | Namba et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5983593 | Carbary et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007397 | Ju | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6020628 | Mravic et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6052965 | Florentin | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054195 | Collins | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6071575 | Collins | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083578 | Collins | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101783 | Howes | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114804 | Kawase | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131410 | Swierkowski | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139913 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141925 | Halvorson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6168040 | Sautner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191359 | Sengupta et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6291036 | Wang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6352749 | Aggas | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365242 | Veerasamy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372312 | Aggas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383580 | Aggas | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387460 | Shukuri | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399169 | Wang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416375 | Cho | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420002 | Aggas et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6436492 | Landa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444281 | Wang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6468610 | Morimoto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478911 | Wang | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6479112 | Shukuri | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6497931 | Aggas | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503583 | Nalepka et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6506272 | Aggas | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6521988 | Hauser et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6537121 | Baret | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538312 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541083 | Landa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6541084 | Wang | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6548895 | Benavides et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558494 | Wang | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571580 | Lodge | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6627814 | Stark | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6635321 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6637644 | Bachli | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6639313 | Martin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6641689 | Aggas | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6653724 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6656768 | Thomas | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6668500 | Lamberts | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6692600 | Veerasamy | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6696849 | Ban et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6701749 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6723379 | Stark | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6736295 | Lin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6759590 | Stark | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6763638 | Berger, Jr. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6789362 | Hessabi | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6793990 | Sakaguchi | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6860075 | Bachli | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6897125 | Morrow et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6924974 | Stark | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928776 | Hornung | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6946171 | Aggas | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6955026 | Misonou | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6962834 | Stark | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966208 | Collins | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6974518 | Hornung | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6974622 | Wade | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7045181 | Yoshizawa | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7081178 | Collins | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7100343 | France | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7114306 | Minaai | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141130 | Minaai | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7238546 | Stark | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7517712 | Stark | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7832177 | Stark | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 20010020738 | Iizima et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020041424 | Lynam | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020043046 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020113296 | Cho et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030188881 | Stark | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040020676 | Stark | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104460 | Stark | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111986 | Zurhaar | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040161530 | Stark | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187437 | Stark | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188124 | Stark | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067179 | Stark | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138892 | Misinou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050217319 | Yoshizawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257877 | Stark | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275079 | Stark | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060157274 | Stark | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187608 | Stark | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060191215 | Stark | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207218 | Minaai et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20090032924 | Stark | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074997 | Stark | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324858 | Jaeger | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100034996 | Mott | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100068561 | Rohwer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100119740 | Bettger | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175347 | Bettger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100178439 | Bettger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0240584 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 0983974 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1544180 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 10-297944 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 10-330134 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 2006121954 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2010019484 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100178439 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61145095 | Jan 2009 | US |